Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Everyone Knows The Truth About Politics


 Everyone Knows The Truth About Politics

by

R.E. Prindle

 
Peggy Noonan
 

Peg Noonan bloviates her way through another weekend article in the 9/14-15/19 issue of the Wall Street Journal.  Don’t get me wrong, believe me I don’t mean bloviate in its negative sense but, since it doesn’t have a positive sense, I mean in a more neutral sense—she’s just talking and I like a good talker.  Peg is the best.

I nearly fell off my chair when in her first paragraph she mentions James Burnham.  That’s going back quite aways to an obscure figure.  Of course her photo is probably touched up but she doesn’t look old enough to know James Burnham except from his books and history.  If you catch my good side, which is a toss up, in a photo I look younger than Peg.

Burnham was your usual Commie who turned whatever post-WWII when the 1917 generation felt that Stalinism failed them, which is to say his crimes could no longer be concealed, so they chose a different boring from within strategy and called themselves born again conservatives.  Burnham, Peg says, was a founder of the magazine National Review.  Good title, it sounds definitely right-wing.  It took me about two issues in the Sixties when I launched into what has passed for an adult life to realize that the Review was a magazine run by born-again Reds.  Christ, Whittaker Chambers said he ‘abandoned’ Communism and immediately became a senior editor of Time Magazine, a so-called conservative rag.  Time and Newsweek both were suspect outfits.  Newsweek marketed a book because it weighed five pounds.  I still have my copy.  Still weighs five pounds.   I have since moved higher and recently bought a twenty pounder.  I’m heavy into self-improvement.

Anyway, Burnham wrote books. Just before 9/11, to leap ahead a moment, it was announced that 2.3 trillion dollars couldn’t be accounted for, just disappeared.  Went away.  Can anyone really wrap their mind around 2.3 trillion.  Incomprehensible.  Without asking yourself how much 2.3 trillion dollars weighs which can be represented in comprehensible numbers, do you how much 2.3 trillion dollars is?  Nobody does.  Incomprehensible.

What this has to do with Burnham?  Along about 1951 an atom bomb disappeared from the stockpile.  Do you know how big an atom bomb was, how much it weighed?  One can’t even consider it in relation to Newsweek’s five pound book.  But that’s not the important part.  Burnham though he knew where it was, in a general sense. It was in the basement of a house in the South Side of Chicago—in the Black Belt, Chicago.  Yowsuh, Negroland.  How do you get a bomb that big into the basement of a house in the Black Belt.  Obviously you disguise it as a five thousand pound book going by at five miles an hour on a flatbed.  What and how else?  It must have easier to build the Great Pyramid.

So, here’s Peg, quoting this guy Burnham who sagely said:  If there’s no alternative there is no problem.  OK, I can dig that.  I used to be a beatnik a few decades back and we could talk like that all day long.  Once you get the swing of it it’s easy.  Viz. ‘the greatest minds of their generation’ Jack Kerouac, Allen Ginsburg and geniuses of that stamp.

So, having made her point Peg goes off on a blizzard of ‘everyone knowses’.    Everyone knows the Democratic candidates are dildoes.  But everyone knows that Pres. Trump is a nutcake so I suppose that means dildoes to the left of me, nutcakes to the right, Sane people in the middle.  There is no alternative so there is no problem to follow Burnham and Peg’s logic.

As much as I like Peg’s stuff, she could develop a more subtle understanding.  Trump is the alternative and Democrats find that a problem.  Everybody knows that, and, she says everyone knows Trump makes a fool of himself with his tweets as though that were an unforgiveable sin.  She doesn’t ask why Trump turned to making tweet storms with winds up to 180 miles per hours.  I can answer that question.  Because from the moment he announced his candidacy the United Media of America made the greatest noise of denunciation America has ever heard.  Even H.L. Mencken who was always prepared for the worst in politics would have been stunned into breathlessness.

How else was Trump to breach this wall of vitriol?  Every reasonable remark he made was turned into something ridiculous by the media.  As President of the United States he was openly mocked by ignorant TV commentators during interviews.   No, Lemon, no, put your hand down, you’ve got your own forum.  Trump’s only way to make a point as everyone knows was to tweet it out.  And then Twitter intimated it was going to ban him for, get this, hate speech.  Nevertheless his tweeting has worked and breached the offensive of the media.

So my point is that until Left and Right acknowledge  how unfairly the President has been treated I have to dismiss every single criticism of the Pres. as mere bigotry.

Peg writes:  By my observation something is going on with Trump supporters.  They now concede much more about him in private than they did in the past.

In other words Peg is insulting Trump’s supporters as total nutcakes who now realize Trump is dropping below even their nuttiness.  Nonsense, we Trump supporters have always served as apologists for his seeming faux pas and gaffes.  Now they’re beginning to make sense.  Everyone knows….

There is no middle Peg and if there were they would have the alternative of voting for delusional Leftists or intelligent Rightists.  In the same issue of the WSJ containing your ruminations Peg the Journal records that China has just blinked in Trump’s ‘crazy’ trade war.  They are removing the ‘punitive’ tariffs on food stuffs- that is principally pork and soybeans. Why?  Not as a concession to encourage Trump but because they can’t feed their people.  They need us more than we need them. 

Trump wins if he knows how to weaponize food and doesn’t get into any Democratic sentimental maunderings.  You see, it is easy to win trade wars when you can starve the other guy out.  Everybody knows that and I believe the Pres. does too.  Just takes a little time but then that is what negotiations do, isn’t it?  You may learn Peg, that the Pres. isn’t nutty, just crazy like a fox.

Saturday, September 14, 2019

Humor In The News


Humor In The News

by

R.E. Prindle

 

This is the funniest news paragraph I’ve read in a very long time.  From The WSJ 9/14/19 headline:  China Waives Tariffs On U.S. Farm Goods.
 

China will exempt purchases on U.S. soybeans, pork and other agricultural products from punitive tariffs, in a move that appears aimed at addressing one of President Trump’s demands during the protracted trade war
Oops.  China can’t feed itself.  They require US soybeans, pork and other essentials that they can’t provide for themselves.  Oops.  They think they’re doing the US a favor by removing ‘punitive’ tariffs. Not at all.  What they are doing is demanding that the US provide them with food essentials. Begging even.   How hilarious this is.

What President Trump should say is that no, no, if you want us to feed you then you must provide us with an incentive and that is this and this and this and this.  Then, no problem, we are shaking hands.  The very idea that the Chinese are caving to US demands!  How can I or anyone else stop laughing.  Concede or starve China.  What about those other sources from whom you were going to buy?  Well, what about them?

And my message to leeching US farmers is this.  The Pres. Has put you in the driver’s seat.  You can expect no more problems from the Chinese.  Now that you can recoup every dime you temporarily lost from China you can repay the American people every goddamn billion you extorted from us in your anguish.  Give that money back.  We need it.  You have been compensated and how.

Monday, August 26, 2019

Support Our President


Support Our President

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Personal status is a very important matter when heads of State have conferences such as a G20 or the current G7.

Status has to do first off with the strength of the country.  The momentum currently is with China and the US is slipping to second, no longer first.  The US should automatically sit at the head of the table because all other countries of any consequence, even China, are sucking off us in one way or another.  They have all been tremendous beneficiaries of the United State for over a hundred years now.

We are the big consumer that have kept and keep their economies running.  All other countries have favorable trade balances with us to our loss.  That the means the US if giving more than it is getting as the Pres. so accurately maintains.

When the heads of State gather, such as at this G7 the men and women themselves are not equals.  The most talented and skillful will assume a dominant position.  There is a battle for preeminence.  The leaders’ role in their own countries may be compared to the quarterback of a football team.  As capable as he may be he has little or no power unless the rest of the team perform their roles.  It therefore follows that for maximum effect the leader’s country should be offering him its full support.  This isn’t hard to understand.

If a country is cutting the legs off its leader he cannot be fully effective while his people are cutting their own throats, mine and yours are included.

President Trump is therefore undermined when a significant portion of his country are cheering for his harassment as loudly as they can.  These people are traitors and fools.  This affects myself and yourself and everyone else.  Whether one agrees with the President or not the Pres. is correct in the trade contest with China.  Europe- England, France, Germany etc. are wrong.

But, as the Pres. is being diminished by traitors his ability to be the preeminent leader of the G7 is being sabotaged.  Thus he may be shoved down the table below such useless trash as Macrone and Merkel.  If these countries, any country, in Europe think of themselves as viable they are mistaken.  They are already dependents of China.  Their only hope is to unite with the US or Russia, both preferably, to maintain any semblance of independence or sovereignty at all.

The Pres. needs maximum support at home for maximum performance at the G7.  For those who understand, shout louder than the detractors. Give the impression that the traitors are insignificant.  Have open contempt for them.

Be indignant of these European losers trying to lessen the Pres. preeminence as in Macrone’s unilateral invitation to the Iranian representative to attend and his snubbing of the Pres.  These proceedings are not jokes.  Our future is being determined by them.  Everything we have sacrificed for Europe over the last more than a century now is forgotten by our European ‘friends.’ 

Liberals stand down.

Sunday, August 25, 2019


Are America And China

Trading Friends Or Enemies?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

We’ve got a new flap concerning old grievances.  The Sunday (7/25/19) New York Times, our arbiter on which news is fit to print and which isn’t, has published a front page article condemning Pres. Trump’s recent tweet encouraging US companies to move back to the US.  The Times is outraged that anyone would consider China an enemy, that is pursuing purely Chinese goals at everyone else’s expense.  In some circles such self-centeredness would be considered aggression but not the NYT.

For decades now Americans have been complaining about the lack of transparency in governmental decisions.  Heck, Obama even ran as a transparent candidate but then reneged immediately on election.  We have it now.  Pres. Trump is so transparent that he tweets his goals and objectives on a daily basis in the what the NYT derogatively designates as ‘tweet storms.’

I guess there’s transparency and then there’s transparency.  There’s a good transparency and a bad transparency.  We’ve never seen the former and now that we have the latter we’ll have to accept that as a step forward.

At any rate, what is clear to everyone not a Liberal is that China has been taking advantage of America’s good will for decades and the Pres. wants to stop it.  Hence, he has ‘ordered’ US companies to begin laying the foundations for a return to America’s ‘welcoming shores.’

The NYT disagrees with this affirmative action as it is so wedded to the China First policies of the last seventy years.  It would be too costly and impossible for such a return to take place, they say.  They point out the Chinese plants would have to be abandoned and that would be an outrageous financial burden. (It would also be the first time they considered the welfare of businesses.)  One tires of pointing out the contradictions of Liberal thought but one must ask why abandoning vast US factories to establish themselves in China was not an intolerable financial burden on companies?  Why are these millions of vacated acres and rusting plants in the US not a symbol of something?  One also has to ask what dog does the NYT have in this matter?  We all know that Mexican money is propping up the NYT propaganda factory; how much are they getting from China?

The Pres. does have the authority, if for nothing else, to encourage the companies to re-establish  in the US.  In any event building the infra structure would take some time, longer or shorter depending on the industry, reestablishing pipelines etc.

But that fabulous propaganda machine, the NYT, that can’t do advocate, says it can’t be done.  Transferring businesses only works from West to East but the earth’s rotation, apparently, precludes East to West.

One is reminded of that old saw of Louis XIV or Jack Kennedy, take your choice, about planting the tree that takes a hundred years to mature.  To  overrule the gardener, one the other or both are said to have excitedly ejaculated:  My goodness, get it in the ground right away we have no time to lose.

Same situation here.  Get moving.

Friday, August 23, 2019

How A Global Trading System Dies


How A Global Trading System Dies

by

R. E. Prindle

 

My title is one of the two slogans on the cover of the September/October issue of the CFR’s Foreign Affairs magazine.  As it is the CFR that can only mean the Council is lamenting the termination of the Chinese uncontested domination of manufacturing and distribution in both Europe and North America.

Of course nothing is more natural or desirable than change.  During the Obama administration when the whole of American mores were forcefully being changed change was good.  Now that President Trump is reorganizing the CFR trading system out of favoring China change is lamentable.  The unfair Chinese system was thought perfect by the CFR.

Strangely, in reading the articles in Foreign Affairs there seems to be a cognitive disconnect about what happened.  The Chinese did not originate the Chinese Trading System to which the CFR alludes, the US did.  The Chinese didn’t have an inkling of an idea of establishing a global trading system.  The country was quite insular and seemingly content to stay that way.

Then in 1971 Nixon and Kissinger traveled to China, groveling before Mao in his nighties and changed the successful old system of Chinese containment releasing the genie from the bottle.

Then Americans, always ready to sell their birthright for a mess of pottage, saw that the Chinese would work hard for virtually nothing so they took their expertise and exported it to China free of any charges to show them how to make gidgets and gadgets for simple minded Americans and so to be able to eventually conquer the world without munitions or armies of any sort but by simply manufacturing gidgets and gadgets.

Not being complete idiots the Chinese studied American history during the nineteenth century and learn that by merely using intellectual properties without paying for them was a royal road to riches and by excluding competition from American goods and restricting outside investments to exclude the very corporation who were exploiting cheap Chinese labor, stealing trade and manufacturing secrets that all the apples on the tree would fall in China.

Speaking of apples, here is an example of the peculiar trading system the CFR so adores.  At one time Washington State was shipping whole crops of apples to China and prospering mightily.  The bureaucrats in DC, mostly CFR members considerately thought this matter over and, apparently thinking it unfair that American growers should be prospering they ordered the Washington State growers to go to China and teach them how to grow apples commercially themselves.  You see, the Chinese couldn’t figure that one out themselves.  Consequently Washington State growers lost that lucrative market.

And in that vein the CFR bureaucrats organized their amazing global trading system whose demise they now deplore.  The opinion of the apple growers hasn’t been solicited.

This incredibly unfair, even criminal, approach to global trade is now dying a natural death.  No, correct that, President Trump is blowing it apart.  As Chinese intransigence hardens into a total refusal to give up their advantages conferred on them by the CFR, President Trump, who’d rather win than lose, is hardening the US approach.  In the latest development he is apparently assuming an autocratic stance more consonant with global political trends and has or is about to order US corporations to abandon China and bring their manufacturing back to the US.

Such a ukase would be the worst thing that could happen to China that, after all, has built its prosperity by exploiting the people of the US and Europe.

Not only is a global trading system dying but the whole post-French Revolution democratic political system is dying.  Democracy is dead as autocracy rises from the ruins of the pre-Soviet Revolution Czarist autocratic system.  Today, change is now.  Rather than resist the current, let’s go with the flow.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

The End Of Democracy


The End Of Democracy

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The September/October issue of Foreign Affairs, the mouthpiece of the Council On Foreign Relations arrived in the mail.  The cover told me the whole story of the contents.  The cover displays two slogans: the first is ‘Autocracy Now’ and the second is ‘How A Global Trading System Dies.’

For this piece let us tackle the slogan: ‘Autocracy Now.’  The CFR notes the multiplying of autocrats.  Xi, Putin, Duterte, Ergonon etc.  It pictures five while omitting the head of the EU, an autocrat if there ever was one, and the Presidency of the US.  Note I do not specify Trump.  The autocracy of the United States began with Bush Sr. continuing through Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama and now President Trump.  Democracy is dead and has been since at least 9/11/01.

The majority of the US is opposed to everything that is being foisted on it by a Liberal minority opposed to the majority. A Liberal minority rules the majority regardless what the majority wants or, indeed, votes for.  A compliant judiciary declares all majority votes unconstitutional.  That’s autocracy friends.  The majority is impotent, the minority rules.  Any dissenting head is smashed down.

Currently in Hong Kong, Xi has ordered that any employee of the airport who participated in the revolution is to be fired.  The White administrator has complied.  Nor is this complacency limited toward the Chinese autocrat.  In the US anyone, for decades now, of prominence refusing to tow the Liberal line has been fired on trumped up charges amounting to nothing.  No on can get or keep a job unless he’s a simpering idiot like Anderson Cooper.  It took a few decades to assimilate Faux News but it has been done just recently.

We are, in fact experiencing a sea change not only in Western Civilization but in global civilization.  The apparent democracy established by the French Revolution has passed.  It is no more.  Democracy has died, the passing was signaled by 9/11/01 and HomeLand Security.  Autonomy has reemerged as the governing force.  The Russian Czars were just a few centuries ahead of their time.

The time of crisis is now hitting the US.  President Trump aborted the establishment of the Liberal autocracy by unbelievably defeating its candidate, Hillary Clinton, who defrauded the Democratic popular candidate Bernie Sanders.  She’s CFR, is it clear?

The exact point of the crisis in the US then, is the election of 2020.  If the Left wins in the US, as it most assuredly will, the US will be placed under the iron heel of an incompetent Leftist boob, whoever that Democratic candidate may be.  It therefore behooves President Trump to establish an official autocracy of the Right, suspend the election, or at least count the ballots as the Dems have been doing for decades to get the desired result.  The results of the election can be announced beforehand to relieve the ‘suspense.’

Now, Xi is clearly is taking actions to destroy personal initiative in Chinese territories that are steadily expanding.  Obama was doing the same in the US.  It is to be believed then that all the autocrats save possibly Trump will act to suppress any freedom of thought or expression thus ensuring the collapse of civilization.

The time has come to steel ourselves to act in our own self-interest.  If any fragment of civilization is to survive, let it be us.  Act now or wear the yoke forever.

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

New Birthers


New Birthers

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In an apparent effort to redeem itself. in the 8/13/19 issue the Wall Street Journal published a Barton Swain article called The New Birthers of which I will publish a few paragraphs.  After decades of ridiculous accusation of Nazism, Hitlerism and Fascism the Left has now in addition to racism begun overusing terms such as White Supremacist.  Swaim compares White Supremacism to the Conservative Birther controversy.  While not exactly comparable there may be some relationship.  After all Obama was born in Kenya, Africa while Trump is not a White Supremacist; in fact he seems to be openly favoring POC much more than Obama ever thought of doing.  Obama was much more sneaky about it.  Here is Swaims argument in his own words:

One of the great annoyances of the 2000s was how Democratic office-holders and media personalities constantly obliged conservatives to defend George W. Bush when we weren’t inclined to.  It felt churlish to criticize a man for signing a terrible budget deal when his enemies were accusing him of invading a foreign country to line the pockets of his friends in the oil industry.

Here we are again, only it’s much worse this time.  You want to fulminate against Donald trump for his cruel tweets and childish behavior or his madcap non-policies on trade and North Korea.  But then the president’s meanest adversaries on the left will level a charge so dishonorable, so wantonly unfair, that you feel almost bound to defend him.

The most common of these charges is that Mr. Trump is a racist.  And lately, the charge having failed to stick the way his despisers thought it would, the charge has been intensified to ‘white supremacist.’

The idea of describing Mr. Trump with any word ending in “ist” has always struck me as risible.  The suffix connotes the conscious holding of a principle or doctrine, whether good or evil—socialist, Dadaist, impressionist, Platonist, meliorist.  But Mr. Trump doesn’t do principles and doctrines.  The only “ist” word that can tenably describe him is “nationalist”, and that fits loosely and only sometimes.  A racist or a white supremacist must at some level consciously hold definably racist or white supremacist beliefs: otherwise the terms are useless.  Mr. Trump may have a neurosis that makes it impossible for him to abide by social conventions, but that does not make him a racist.  His attention span is too short, his eye too firmly fixed on momentary advantage to adopt a creed more complex than “Make America Great Again.”

Yet Mr. Trump’s fiercest adversaries couldn’t be more certain that he is a racist.  They parse his tweets and his spoken words and quote them to each other in versions deliberately stripped of context.  They speak of “dog whistles” and “code language,” as if he were capable of verbal subtlety.  They accuse him of saying what he hasn’t said:  I wonder how many commentators on CNN and MSNBC have stated, as if reporting fact, that Mr. Trump thinks Mexicans are rapists and neo-Nazis “good people”?  If he were an actual racist or white supremacist, Mr. Trump’s verbal incontinence would have made this fully apparent by now.  There would be no need to debate the question.

While not exactly complimentary to the President the essay does show up the ridiculousness of Liberal discourse.  The simply do not listen to themselves or they wouldn’t emote such twaddle.  However, defensiveness is not going to deliver the election.  Only attack after attack displaying the ineptness of the Democrats and whoever their candidate may be is the only method.  Don’t pull punches. The Right must totally disregard these puerile accusations, and attack, undermine, destroy each and every Liberal offensive.

The Left is firmly entrenched in the States they won last election and they are making gains in key States such as Texas and Florida that were tenuous back in ’16.  So-called independents much be convinced that their future lies with Trump.  If these can be won there may be chance for Trump to win.  Quality Republican Congressional candidates have to be found.  That is essential.  Most essential is to realize that this is trench warfare and not some Super Bowl Game.  And that goes for China too.  Xi is probably holding out hoping to ‘influence an American election’ and it may work.  Losing will be catastrophic.  Buckle down, this is serious.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

Thoughts On Mr. Bezos Pecker Problem


Thoughts On Mr. Bezos’ Pecker Problem

by

R.E. Prindle

https://medium.com/@jeffreypbezos/no-thank-you-mr-pecker-146e3922310f

Let’s keep the ball rolling on this issue that Mr. Bezos has brought to our attention.   We have little idea of the behind the senses activity so we can only deal with what is public.

It seems that the Mr. Bezos owned Washington Post has been attacking Mr. David Pecker’s publication the National Enquirer, itself owned by a corporation calling itself AMI.

The sin of the NE as identified  by Mr. Bezos is being in contact with Saudi Arabia.  This seems strange as the Saudis are publicized as one of our stalwart allies, second only to Israel.  It is difficult to see the offence  even if it relates somehow to Pres. Trump.  Yet this seems to be the basis of Mr. Bezos’ and the WP’s complaint.

There does seem to be some involvement with government investigators between Mr. Bezos, the WP and the Mueller outfit.

Mr. Bezos make this incomprehensible statement:

Quote:

Federal investigators and legitimate media…suspected and proved that Mr. Pecker has used the Enquirer and AMI for political reasons.

Unquote:

I have always held Mr. Bezos in high regard for his unbelievable commercial success but here he makes the incomprehensible statement that it is wrong that newspapers have political reasons in publishing.  Has Mr. Bezos never heard of the Editorial page?  Are not stories and their characterizations used for political purposes?  Do not newspapers endorse and recommend their favorite candidates?  Good Lord, doesn’t Mr. Bezos own the Washington Post and use it for defaming Pres. Trump.

Actually, he does know it.  (One wonders if Mr. Bezos doesn’t also own the Medium site,  the site on which he chooses to expose himself.)  Mr. Bezos calls his ownership of the WP a ‘complexifier’.  In other words it compromises him.

Quote:

Even though the Post is a complexifier for me, I do not regret my investment.  (The Post loses tens of millions of dollars a year; some investment.  More a vanity and/or political project.)

The Post is a critical institution with a critical mission.  My stewardship (note the word) of the Post and my support of its mission, which will be unswerving (and) remain unswerving…

Unquote.

Very well, but can’t Mr. Pecker say the same about his relationship with the National Enquirer.  Is the NE really any less legitimate than the WP?  Is Mr. Bezos mouthpiece any less reprehensible in its political ‘mission’ to discredit Pres. Trump?

Mr. Bezos then says:

Quote:

Back to the story:  Several days ago, an AMI leader, (Editor I presume Mr. Bezos means) advised us (us being whom?) that Mr. Pecker went  “apoplectic” about our investigation.  For reasons still to be better understood, the Saudi angle seems to be a particularly sensitive nerve.

Unquote.

Why should it?  Didn’t Pres. Obama make an obsequious bow from the hip while place his hand in the Saudi king’s hand as a sign of fealty?

There we have the crux of the matter.  Mr. Pecker’s counter attack.  Apparently fighting back is not kosher to Mr. Bezos.

After having been married to a lovely lady for twenty-five years, and building the most successful gigantic business on the planet Mr. Bezos decided he needs a hot babe and so he went out and bought one (for lack of a better word) not only that he bought a married one.

In this romance Mr. Bezos, who is perhaps one of the top ten tech wizards in the world inexplicably sent and exchanged pornographic photos with his Hot Tamale.  These emails and photos were then given or sold to the NE.

Mr. Bezos believes that the Pres. somehow hacked them.  Where they came from is beside the point but the NE categorically denies they got them by hacking.  Using Occam’s Razor the most obvious suspect is the Hot Tamale.  After all if you had bagged a guy worth 150 billion dollars wouldn’t you want the world to know?  What Hot Tamale wouldn’t?  Anent that we have heard no objections from the husband and no filing for divorce.

In frustration the NE tried to negotiate with  Mr. Bezos offering to squelch publication if he gave up his unwarranted persecution of them on the WP.

Mr. Bezos chooses to call this offer extortion and blackmail.  Mr. Bezos will hopefully pardon a knowing smile on our part.

One wonders at what strategic moment Mr. Bezos will choose to announce his candidacy for President of the United States.  I think you just killed your chances, Sir.

Sunday, July 22, 2018

Standup Comedy At The New York Times


Stand up Comedy At The New York Times

by

R. E. Prindle

 

Whether intentional or not the times has published the funniest sketch ever entitled:  Inquiry Focuses On Publisher’s Support For Trump.  It seems it is or should be illegal for any newspaper, and I might add the National Enquirer has never before been called a newspaper, to support our Pres.
Federal authorities examining the work President Trump’s former lawyer did to squelch embarrassing stories before the 2016 election have come to believe that an important ally in the effort, the tabloid company American Media, Inc. (National Enquirer) at times acted more as a political supporter than as a news organization, according to people briefed on the investigation.
I hope that they aren’t going to waste a lot of our money over this.  I read the paper and I have to state unequivocally that the National Enquirer was the only publication (the NE is more of a magazine than a newspaper) that had a good word for the future Pres.

The smear pieces that filled the pages of the Times, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, New York Mag, Harper’s, Atlantic and every other publication without exception, did I forget to mention Rolling Stone, was unconscionable.  It was pure anti-Trump propaganda.  ‘You cannot elect this man.’  they all screamed.  The Times itself shilled for Hillary while shamelessly violating all journalistic standards to publish pure propaganda, fake news, against Trump.
It could also spell trouble for the company which publishes The National Enquirer, raising thorny questions about when coverage that is favorable to a candidate strays into overt political activity and when First Amendment protections should apply.
 

If that isn’t the height of hypocrisy I don’t know what is.  This hit comedy piece was written by two guys with obvious noms de plume, Jim Rutenberg and Ben Profess, apparently the subject was too tough for just one writer, who apparently learned nothing about the history of journalism at Harvard.  I don’t know whether the duo went to Harvard but their writing is on the level of what Harvard has become.  Had they learned their history they would be aware that publishers have always influenced elections by endorsing one candidate over another.  In other words they explicitly said vote for Brown because we don’t like Blonde.

The Times, then, is imploring Congress to investigate whether Hillary’s First Amendment rights were violated when the National Enquirer endorsed Trump.  Doesn’t the Times know that the NE has been sued so many times that in self-protection each story is closely fact checked and that includes anything about Trump?   Who is calling the shots at the Times?  Not Rutenberg or Profess, they’re contract writers doing what they’re told.

Nor was the story confined to the back pages where any apologies go but is in the exact center of the front page of the 7/22/18 Sunday edition.  Sunday, the day the paper gets maximum exposure.  I wouldn’t have seen it otherwise and when I did I fell out of my chair laughing, spilled coffee all over myself.
The Times is spilling its reputation all over the place.

Monday, May 7, 2018

China's Agricultural Dream


 

China’s Agricultural Dream

by

R.E. Prindle

 

I have read where some people condemn Pres. Trump’s Chinese tariffs because China ‘retaliated’ by placing a 50% tariff on sorghum causing a few ships bearing a sorghum cargo to return to port.  This was supposed to be disastrous for American farmers. 

In the 5/7/18 issue of the Wall Street Journal there appears this article:  Syngenta Pushes Plant Research in China.  It is of some interest.  I quote the first four paragraphs:
China is seeking a lead in editing plant genes, potentially shifting the epicenter of the emerging agricultural technology toward the East.

Syngenta AG, the seed and chemical giant now owned by state-owned China National Chemical Corp., is building up a Beijing hub for developing new gene-editing technologies like Crispr-Cas9, which enable new ways to alter DNA.

The company also intends to piggyback off research being pursued by Chinese universities and access a broader talent pool than rivals like Monsanto Co. and DowDuPont Inc.  compete for in the U.S.

“The government is very supportive of this technology in China,” said Erik Fyrwald, Syngenta’s chief executive, who said the company is investing tens of millions of dollars to develop gene editing.  “It’s just natural for us to build it up there for China, and for the world.”

That is helping to stoke long-running worries among U.S. farmers, academics and companies that the forefront of agricultural science could swing from the U.S. Farm Belt to China, where the government has encouraged the development of large-scale Western-style farming operations to boost domestic food production and rely less on imports.
As you can see China does not have the talent to develop the technology on their own so they bought a European research ‘giant’ to acquire the latest technology and Aryan talent thus starting from a higher level and hopefully build from that.  We’ll see.

It seems clear that China is hoping to become self-sufficient agriculturally as well as industrially.  Thus whatever else happens we can expect them to reduce their agricultural imports from the US.  We can expect them to grow crops for all their needs including sorghum.  It is only a question of how long it will take them to become self-sufficient thus destroying whatever agricultural business is being done with the US.  These sorghum shipments are only the tip of the iceberg.

Free Trade obviously means nothing to China, it only means something to the dunces of the West.  China does not intend to trade, they intend to become self-sufficient and sell only, not part of any world trade organization but being the world trade organization and masters of the world.

Why the US and Europe are so thick that they can’t perceive this is probably the result of four hundred years of Aryan success and an unadmitted feeling of comfortable superiority over the ‘little yellow man.’  At one time this feeling of superiority may have been justified and Kingdom. real but now the race lacks the will to maintain it.  We will watch the world sink into the ancient lethargy of the Middle

Sunday, April 29, 2018

Election Strategies


Election Strategies

by

R.E. Prindle

 

It is time to develop election strategies here on the grass roots level.  There is no reason to leave matters up to the RNC which has proven itself singularly incapable.  Obviously the key issue is immigration.  The key point there is that we have more ‘new citizens’ than we can assimilate.  The ‘new people’ have been elected.  All our resources both human and material are fully stressed.  Stressed to the breaking point.

While the Wall is important and should still be pressed it is also useful to present other talking points.  One might be the example of a balloon that can only hold so much air before it bursts.  We being at the point where one more puff of immigrants will burst the balloon.

Another might be that of a cake that when baked to perfection must be removed from the oven lest it burn and shrivel.  The lesson being that immigration has reached that level where more baking will be destructive.

And then there’s that good one- think of the children and their future.  What sort of conditions are we creating for them?

Any such point can be introduced without jeopardizing your job or standing- or worse.  One says merely that while one has no quarrel with immigration per se, one is worried because….  That will keep you on the safe side.

Doubt must be sown among the least dogmatic of the Libs.

Write your Congressman, local TV newscasters or even national newscasters.  Submit them to a barrage.  Make your opinion known; use different names and addresses.  Maybe the ‘Russians’ will pitch in and help.  Who knows?

Now is the time to act.

Saturday, April 28, 2018

A November 2018 Election Prediction


A November 2018 Election Prediction

by

R.E. Prindle

Disregard the strange format, computer acting up. 

I find the Arizona special congressional election interesting.  On its basis I am ready to make my prediction for the November elections.

The Liberal narrative is that Pres. Trump carried such Congressional districts by 20% and since the congressional candidates, who bear little relationship to the Pres. don’t carry the Pres. supposed vast margins that means  the House and Senate will go Democratic  in November.  I don’t believe any such thing is indicated.

The Arizona district is adjacent to Phoenix and swings away from the city center.  With that in mind the further from the center precincts of the district the larger the Republican margins are. Thus in those further out the Republican candidate did carry those precincts by 20% or more.  Thus 65-35 Republican in some precincts.

The margin narrowed the closer the precincts got to Phoenix; the inner precincts went Democratic but by much smaller margins giving the district vote to the Republicans.  It seems a safe conjecture then that the core Phoenix districts would go Democratic.  However, the number of votes cast in any congressional district has no bearing outside the district.  If a district went 100% either way it would not affect the other districts.  So, if we refer to the Presidential map which is totally red except for a few blue big city islands the composition of Congress will depend on how many congressmen represent those city districts and how many represent the larger red areas.  I am of the opinion that the red areas will return Republicans while only the blue cities will return Democrats.  The composition of congress will depend on how many congressmen represent those cities and how many represent the larger red area.

On that basis I am predicting that the composition of Congress will be either unchanged or will swing +10% Republican to possibly a 5% gain for the Democrats.

It doesn’t matter how large the majorities are because whether a fraction or a landslide the winner is still the winner and heads for Washington.

Trump effect or no Trump effect a Republican win, as in Arizona is a Republican win.  Much will depend on how the Pres.’ policies work.  The Korean success, which has boggled the Democratic mind, should weigh heavily in the voters’ mind and any improvement in the economy is also going to strengthen the Republicans which may create a Trump effect and gain more districts.  If the Pres. remains successful Republican  gains may be 10%+.  That means, or should mean, that Pres. Trump can run the board any way he likes thus ending the CFR/Democratic hegemony.

Work to make sure every Republican votes while encouraging Democrats to vote Republican too.  Certain votes, immigrants, Blacks and Jews are completely out of reach as they block vote Democratic, don’t waste time trying to convert them.

Sunday, March 25, 2018

Magic, The Land Of Faerie, And The Liberal Mind


Magic, The Land of Faerie

And The Liberal Mind

The March-April Issue Of Foreign Affairs:

A Discussion

by

R.E. Prindle

-1-

The March-April issue of Foreign Affairs arrived and once again it is dedicated to the denunciation of President Trump.   As is well known Foreign Affairs is the propaganda arm of the Council On Foreign Relations.  The CFR is not merely an informational service, it is also a potent influence within the government of the United States.  Many members have even served as President of the United States.  In fact, the last four presidents covering twenty-four consecutive years, that is Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama and had Hillary Clinton been placed a full twenty-eight, possible thirty-two years.  Time enough to indoctrinate two and half generations.

Thus it was a bitter disappointment for them when Donald Trump made a run around end to win the White House.  His mere candidacy had unleashed an unceasing barrage of hatred and since he has been under siege defending himself against innumerable CFR sappers.  The March-April issue continues the assault.  The five themed articles under the heading Letting Go are:  Trump’s Lucky Year, Why the Chaos Can’t Last, The World After Trump, How The System Can Endure,  The Rise Of Illiberal Hegemony:  Trump’s Surprising Grand Strategy, The Post-American World Economy:  Globalization In The Trump Era and Giving Up The High Ground: America’s Retreat On Human Rights.

As is evident the Liberal ‘system’ that the CFR presidents were putting in place and which would have been completed by the election of Hillary Clinton has been disrupted by the election of Donald Trump who is, in fact, dismantling the whole Liberal CFR system.  Hence, an article on how the system can endure, one imagines, behind the scene:  the so-called Dark Government.

This raises the question of what beyond specific goals as outlined in Foreign Affairs is the Liberal mind set.  In the larger scope of human history to what psychological reality, Weltanschauung motivates the Liberal mind.

Many theories have been advanced about the motivating forces that direct human activity.  The Hegelian/Marxist view is of course based on economics.  But underlying theories such as Marxism is the fundamental dichotomy of the spiritual vs. the material.  The fantasy of life vs. the reality.  The Liberal utopian based ‘spirituality’ vs. the Conservative naturalistic based view of reality.  The soft-headed vs. the hard-headed.

In many ways the Liberal mind is magical in nature.  The Liberal desires and magically creates a reality that assumes that the desire is fact.

Thus Adam S. Posen who wrote the article The Post-American World Economy:  Globalization in the Trump Era projects on the one hand the desire of the Liberal post-WWII system while on the other unconsciously contrasts the reality.  The very title The Post-American World Economy contradicts the assumption that the Post-WWII US world order is still in operation. So, possibly, Trump is merely destroying the Liberal mental fantasy.  Negating the magic.  Post-American posits an end to the US domination and, indeed, under Obama the CFR destroyed the dominant role of the US with the result that a number of more or less equals are now jockeying for position.

Mr. Posen begins his article with the illusory view of this so-called seventy year post-war Liberal world order.
 

In the aftermath of World War II the United States set about building a global, rules base economic order.  At the heart of the order it put the Liberal values of free trade backed up by U.S. power and bolstered by its growing legitimacy among other countries, prevented most economic disputes from escalating into mutually destructive trade wars, let alone military conflict.  That allowed even the smallest and poorest countries to develop their social and economic potential without having to worry about predation by strange neighbors.  By taking much of the fear out of the global economy, the U.S. led order allowed market decisions to be driven by business not bullying.

Adam S. Posen, The Post-American World

Economy:  Globalization in the Trump

Era, pp 28-38
 

Having been present at the creation and having lived through the whole period in varying degrees of cognizance,  I can tell you that the above view of the seventy years is contradicted fully by my own experience and understanding.

The problems of our times have become more difficult.  The fantasy of the American Century has passed.  It is no longer about ‘things’ but one of attitudes of which most that are held are not realistic.  There is at the base of the matter still the conflict between the ‘spiritual’ and the materialist views; that is, the longing for the magical supernatural Land of Faerie vs. Science , or the reality of matter, or put another way religion vs. science.  Let us review the evolution of human consciousness.

-2-

One must assume that early man was as unconscious as are wild animals today.  In other words, early man had no rational explanation for external reality.  And this extends back into hundreds of thousands, millions, of years of pre-Homo Sapiens existence.  Presumably the more recent nomenclature homo sapiens, wise or knowledgeable man, indicates the beginning of consciousness of the world outside the mind.  As it took until the twentieth century before psychologists began to significantly understand the working of the human mind it can be easily seen that the learning process  was long and slow.  Man was barely conscious of either his own mind or the world outside his mind, working with very little true knowledge he came up with some pretty bizarre explanations of how things functioned.

He invested all animate and inanimate objects with life and sensation.  Thus he created the supernatural and the natural.  The world was filled with invisible beings both good and bad.  Gods and Devils, Faeries, Elves, Gnomes, Elementals.  The air was packed with demons and angels and what have you.  This was true down to and including the beginning of history and well beyond, even into the nineteenth century.  Gods came and went, old gods died, gods who failed in their duties were discarded or transformed.  Each people had their own gods.  In the clash of peoples and therefore gods, peoples went under and with them their gods.

In this mental context I would like to examine the period in European history from 1100 to 1300, a very critical and rich period in Europe and the Middle East that would eventually affect the world when the European diaspora took place from c. 1400 to the beginning of the twentieth century.

By1300 the Catholic, that is the Universal, Church was the dominant supernaturally based force in Europe and the ME- Middle East.  In order to confirm its position it had to eliminate all other supernatural belief systems.  This was no easy task as other supernatural beliefs systems had the same credibility as the Christian and the Catholic Church was never completely successful.  This was a wonderful period and I hope I can successfully display it with some justice. 

There were many competing supernatural belief systems competing at this time, many remnants of old decayed and dying gods as well as their successors trying to establish themselves against the dominant Catholic Church.

The old Greco-Roman systems still survived in out the way places and pockets and even in the popular mind.  The old Egyptian systems had been mutating since the Assyrian invasions of the seventh century BC.  No longer with a national State to support the religion it had infiltrated Christianity to a degree and went on mutating over the centuries but was still a potent force as an element of the Catholic faith.

Of course the backbone of Catholicism came from the Jewish religious system through Christianity.  The Catholic Church took over Jewish religious sites wholesale.  Thus the erstwhile Jewish capital of Jerusalem became the holiest site of Christianity in Europe.  With the founding of the Mohammedan religion of Arabia the so-called Holy City fell into non-Jewish-Christian hands.

As Europe reorganized  and became somewhat unified under the Carolingian kings of France, the idea of the Holy City in Moslem hands became intolerable in Church eyes and so just prior to 1100 the Church instigated the idea of liberating Jerusalem giving the period under consideration the name of the Crusades.

This was done for supernatural reasons.  On the European side one was under God and on the Moslem side one was under their deity who went by the name of Allah.  Thus one had the War of the Gods.

The ME had always been a hotbed of competing supernatural religious ideas.  Innumerable Gods and Goddesses.  Some intriguing mental projections in the bargain.  Generally speaking few if any had completely disappeared.  If the actual religion has been suppressed the guiding ideas lived on.

The human mind has continued to evolve, that is consciousness, so that the internal unconscious mind has been enlightened toward a correct appreciation of the external world.  That is, as Freud expressed it, the personality or mind is integrated when consciousness has illuminated the unconscious.  The period under consideration was an important period in the evolution of consciousness.  It should be remembered that any of these imaginary beings had equal validity in the consciousness of people of the times.  God or Faerie, same thing.

The Aryan Land of Faerie has as much a claim to reality as did the God of the Jews, Isis of the Egyptians, Cybele, the God of the Christians, however as Jews and Christians were dominant the other imaginary deities were not disproved but ridiculed and suppressed.  Thus, in this tremendous period of the Christian crusades to recapture the religious capital of Jerusalem there were many unintended consequences.  The Crusades opened the gates to admit ideas from the other suppressed belief systems.  Thus, the Cathar religion of Manichean sympathies had migrated West from Iran through the Balkans to gain a firm foothold in Southern France, also known as the Occitan. 

This was a large trans-Alpine area including the Aquitaine.  This area fostered the romances of King Arthur and the Round Table which was a Faerie kingdom.  A land of magic and enchantment both anathema to Judeo-Christianity.  The wonderful romances, far outshining the dull Jewish bible, were developed during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries.

Thus the Catholic Church was confronted by a number of competing belief systems.  The Cathar problem was solved in the midst of the Middle Eastern crusades by a crusade against the Cathars.  A genocidal war against the unfortunate Cathars was conducted by the French at the instigation of the Church.  This involved an actual man hunt to destroy the Cathars root and branch.  Apparently the Church remembered the Amalekites.

That solution was really easy for the Church but the Arthurian romances that involved England, France, Germany and associated peoples could not be dealt with so easily.  Indeed, when the main assault came against the Church it would come from the three countries mentioned. They required boring from within, co-opting the ideology.  Catholic writers thus chose to change the direction of the romances from a warrior cult to one of a quest for spiritual perfection.  This was achieved through the introduction of the character of Galahad, the son of the nearly perfect but flawed knight, Lancelot of the Lake.

At the same time a French series of works called the Chansons de Geste- Songs of Adventure- were written to discredit the Land of Faerie.  A key text along this line was an amazing story titled Huon of Bordeaux.  Bordeaux was a key Cathar city, sort of the Faerie capital, bordering the the key Cathar stronghold of Mont Segur.  Galahad ascended to heaven from that stronghold along with the Holy Grail to lay the Arthurian threat to rest.

Huon of Bordeaux introduces the king of the Faerie Land, Oberon.  Oberon and God are in a contest to see which would most successfully aid Huon in his quest to exonerate himself from a punishment imposed by the ninth century king of France, Charlemagne.  Bear in mind this was a contest between two imaginarily real gods, God and Oberon, king of the Faeries.

Huon, had violated chivalric protocol by successfully defending himself against Charlemagne’s evil son, killing him in the process.  Charlemagne then banishes Huon, allowing him back only if he succeeds in a number of seemingly impossible feats in the Holy Land against a Moslem king.  Huon doesn’t have a prayer, however passing through a forbidden forest in the Holy Land he is confronted by Oberon, king of the Faeries.  This is equivalent to running into the Catholic God.  Oberon, after extracting a number of vows, gives Huon a horn which if blown in dire straits Oberon will appear with a hundred thousand troops to rescue him.  Huon is cautioned to never use it unless his situation is beyond redemption otherwise.

Huon is the light-headed sort so he blows the horn to test it.  Oberon appears with his 100K troops but is miffed because Huon didn’t follow instructions.  In any event Huon through Oberon’s aid performs the impossible tasks Charlemagne set him and returns to Bordeaux before returning to Paris and  the king’s court as instructed.  Another boo-boo in a long string of boo-boos.  Huon could have been the prototype of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan.

While absent from his home his brother Gerard had usurped his role and now refuses to give it up.  Further adventures intervene but Charlemagne in the end comes to Bordeaux to receive evidences of Huon’s successes.  Huon is unable to produce them as his brother has stolen them from him.  At this time Oberon appears and magically exonerates Huon.  As God had done nothing to help Huon one would think Oberon to be judged the greater than God but Huon irrationally chooses the ineffective God over Oberon even after Huon abdicates his kingship, and renounces Faerieland appointing Huon his successor.  Right.  Even though now King of Faerie Land Huon chooses to live happily ever after in his domain of Bordeaux while God is declared he victor in the contest with Oberon.

Meanwhile the Church was capturing the Arthurian Faerie Land so that as the fourteenth century began the Cathars, Faeries and the real life Knights Templar who had been associated with the Cathars had been disposed of.  The Jews were suppressed and the Church and God were seemingly in control.  However in the fifteenth century Constantinople, today’s Istanbul, was to fall to the Moslems releasing even more heretical ideas against the Catholic ideology that would result in the Enlightenment during which the European mind matured to the point where the scientific assumed prominence and scientific investigation began to reveal the true state of Nature.  This development destroyed the basis of supernatural thinking placing all forms of the fantastic into defensive positions or beyond into fiction.

The Jews abandoned the idea of God, the Catholics refused to accept reality and Europeans who cherished the Faerie forced to blend the Faerie with science.  That is to say, turn Faerie lands into fiction.  Thus the Romantic Age took form in the wreck of the French Revolution.  The First Romantic period was a wonderful time of discovery producing astonishingly beautiful literary products.

Science continued to remove the Veil of Isis revealing nature to the human mind.  The next big test was Darwin’s formulation of Evolution.  The concept had been discussed for a hundred years previously but Darwin wrote the words that condensed evolutionary theory into fact.  Romantics who had been holding on were now forced to adapt further.  This adaptation produced the Second or Neo-Romantic who struggled in the face of scientific realities.

An interesting development occurred.  Mankind refused to give up the supernatural.  It would appear that the terrors of the real world required an imaginary refuge in which things could be controlled.  Thus a transition from an imagined heaven or Faerie land began a conversion to an other world (parallel  universe) that while equally unrealizable was equally comforting.  The Pre-Raphaelites reached back into the past to idealize the world before the artist Raphael.  From that beginning it blossomed into late nineteenth and early twentieth century novels.  Among many others were the reactionary works of William Morris and the futuristic novels of the near great George Du Maurier.  Du Maurier brought forward the Faerie projected into the future in a sort of science fiction.

In the US, L. Frank Baum created a modern fairy tale in his Land of Oz stories.  This also meshed with the English Ruritanian novels of Anthony Hope and the US interpreter George Barr McCutcheon.

All these threads including Rider Haggard’s romantic African fantasies were brought together in the novels of the American Edgar Rice Burroughs.  While not thought of as a Neo-Romantic, Burroughs was probably the greatest of the lot.

As a result of a brain injury as a young man Burroughs was capable of disappearing into his brain world to create amazing fictional realities.

His scientific background and romantic projections are nearly perfect blends.  In his Tarzan series he employs Africa as a geographic reality but then transforms it into a romantic fairyland that could never exist.  In his own way Burroughs character Tarzan is a reinvention of Oberon.  This confused a lot of readers who insisted that the real Africa differed from Burroughs’ imaginary Africa.  No contest.

For instance, Burroughs wanted to have tigers in Africa so he wrote them in to his Faerie Land.  The magazine version of Tarzan of the Apes had tigers and made the story truly fabulous.  However readers, being literal when their imaginations failed to embrace the flights of Burroughs’ fancy forced the writer to change the tigers to lions thereby wrecking the Faerie land Africa, this alternate reality that Burroughs wished to create.  Burroughs himself was heavily influenced by the fairy tales of L. Frank Baum, with whom he became great friends, so that if  you’ve read Baum and keep Oz in mind while reading Burroughs the stories take on an added dimension.

Burroughs didn’t stop with Tarzan and Africa but out of the same mind during the same period created another fairly land on Mars and another at the Earth’s core honoring the fabulous hollow Earth notion.  Thus three complete Faerie lands.

Of course, there was already a fairly large body of Mars and space travel stories in existence but they took a fairly clumsy approach and turned it into a whole something else, sensational, perhaps, for the moment but without enduring appeal.

At the same time, early teens of the twentieth century, a man named Hugo Gernbach was taking science fiction to a whole new level beyond Burroughs that would result in the fantastic blossoming of sci-fi in the nineteen-fifties.

This was truly a romantic recreation of Faerie Land.  Worlds beyond comprehension; the transformation of the Little Folk into space aliens of every description with their human counterparts.  The true nature of sci-fi has been little appreciated.

The neo-Romantics of the second period also created the horror and fantasy genres that would dominate literature along with sci-fi.  The two greatest and most enduring creations were the Frankenstein of Mary Bysshe Shelley of the first Romantic period and the greatest of the monsters, Bram Stoker’s vampire Dracula.  Vampire stories had been around since Shelley’s friend Dr. Polidori wrote his short vampire piece.  Varney the Vampire had made his appearance in mid-century England, attributed to Rymer but Stoker’s sensational novel formed the template for all future vampire stories including those of Anne Rice who was or is totally obsessed by the genre.  Thus the supernatural transformed into quasi-scientific reality has survived to the present.

The Liberal mind evolved out of the Judeo-Catholic religious sphere, more specifically influenced by the Jewish aspects of the Old Testament, most especially by the notion of a people elected by god to rule mankind in his name.  The notion is essentially amoral.

As the Jews are supposed to be creating God’s will on Earth, bringing his rule to all people they believe that means by any means necessary. That notion includes the elimination of whole peoples who may stand in the way of that realization.  Thus the great Liberal novelist Victor Hugo would explain in his novel 1793 the advent of the new perfect Liberal world can never be achieved so long as ‘obstructionists’ live so that Liberals are justified in killing tens or hundreds of million or even a billion in what would be a vain attempt to eliminate differences of opinion.

Thus, today, we have the Liberals hoping, praying for the deaths of ‘old’ people who they fancy stand in the way of the realization of their utopia, while they imagine all people under say fifty are guided one mindedly by their utopian ideal.

On the other hand, Jews, Negroes and others believe that the whole White population of a billion people must be eliminated before their dreams can be realized.  It was believed by them that their dream was approaching realization in this 2016 election.

This hope was upset by the maverick Donald Trump.  Trump’s election set the Liberals off on a disappointed frenzy.  Hence, Foreign Affairs issue Volume 97 no. 2 is devoted to expressing their disappointment by denouncing now President Trump.

Thus of the five articles under the collective Letting Go, three are definitely written by Jews, Eliot A. Cohen,  Barry R. Posen and Adam S. Posen.  The female contributor Sarah Margon is also Jewish.  The only possible non-Jewish contributor is Jacob Sullivan, possibly of Irish derivation.  As these articles are all assigned, that is written on hire, Sullivan may be assumed to be compliant.

It is evident therefore that the Jews are behind the extreme anti-Trump movement.  While Trump seems to be obligated and subservient to the Jews for financial reasons their extreme opposition can only be based on the fact that Trump has taken a course independent of Jewish hopes and dreams.

The Jews, then, forming the core beliefs and fantasies of the Liberals give full and open access to the Liberal mind.  The Liberals consider themselves to be justified sinners, the elect chosen by god to bring his heaven, his perfection to Earth as in heaven.  There is no dissuading them, no ameliorating their extreme beliefs.  They can only be quarantined or suppressed much as they hope to murder all opposition.

There is no room for discussion or compromises.  Either they win or non-believers win.  There is no other option.