Monday, November 28, 2016

Trump The Globalist


Trump The Globalist

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In this great big happy global community it is always pleasant to hear from our correspondent from Peru, Mr. Hernando De Soto, in the 11/28/16 Wall Street Journal in a piece he entitles The Real Enemy for Trump Is Mercantilism, Not Globalism.  Mr. De Soto addresses this as Trump’s real problem.

In his role of incoming president Trump represents the problems facing the US and I respectfully demur from Mr. De Soto’s opinion that our problem is mercantilism.  It definitely is not.  The problem is globalism as Trump has repeatedly pointed out.  Few people seem to hear him.

The problem as Trump addresses it is the differential in the cost of producing goods in the US and the rest of the world, most specifically China and Mexico.  A secondary problem is the exclusion of American made goods and the equal right of investing globally; that is, China specifically excludes the right to invest in China that that country enjoys in investing in the US and the third problem is the artificial maintenance of the currency exchange right by China and possibly Mr. De Soto’s Peru although I am not familiar with Peruvian attitudes.  In other words Trump’s position is that the playing field has to be leveled.  Mercantilism has nothing to do with it.

In order then, for the global economy to go forward some sort of global equity should be speedily arranged and I am sure Trump will obtain this equity by any means necessary if the various participants refuse to see reason.

As far as the US part in the global economy one may say the gold rush is over.  We’ve set the global economy on its feet.  It is now time for reciprocation.  There is nothing more absurd than that US military supplies be made in China.  I’m sure Mr. De Soto sees the point.  Our people need jobs too.  Mr. Trump will bring the US economy back home.   China having been taught how can then exploit its one and a half billion population for decades without any need for the US.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016


Trump’s New Era:

Look Out, There’s A Monster Coming

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The election is over.  It has Taken President-elect Trump but little time to signal that his coming is a New Era.  The hot house incestuous Left took even less time to throw a hissy fit, rioting in the streets while physically abusing Trump voters as they shouted about how democratic they are.

The media reacted to the Trump peril in their typical way bemoaning the fact that the Left’s era was over, at least temporarily.  After distorting Trump’s proposed policies to nonsense pre-election the media isn’t now prepared to deal with the fact that Trump is actually putting those policies into effect now.

The ever obtuse editor of the Wall Street Journal, Bret Stephens, either pretends not to understand or is too thick to understand what Trump means by putting US interests first.  Mr. Stephens asked what I presume is the rhetorical question: [WSJ 11/11/16] “What real American, after all, wouldn’t put “American first” in his political priorities?”   Mr. Stephens is apparently ignorant that our outgoing president, Barack Obama, put every country’s interests before the US.  Not being overly familiar with US history Mr. Stephens is also unaware that Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who one might describe as a ‘real American’, put British and Jewish interests first before ours by driving us into the most destructive war in the history of the world.  Obviously you don’t have to be a ‘Domestic Terrorist’ knuckledragger to subordinate US interests to others, you can be a ‘real American.’

Therefore Mr. Stephens is hysterically vocal in his opposition to Trump’s appointment as counsel of Stephen Bannon.  Mr. Stephens snidely says quote:  “Mr. Bannon also says his “America first” which- see if you can spot the difference- either is or isn’t “America First.”

In my opinion there is no difference, small f or capital F.  The idea is that we not look to others’ interests in preference to our own as Obama and FDR did.  A crime in Mr. Stephens’ eyes.  Mr. Stephens apparently applauds that China and Mexico are being made rich at the expense of the US working stiff.

As incestuous as the Left is Mr. Stephens then not so closely associates one he detests with one he hates.  He says:

As my colleague Bari Weiss pointed out in a recent article in Tablet, the foremost figure in today’s alt-right, Richard Spencer, dreams of “a new society, an ethno-state that would be a gathering point for all Europeans. It would be a new society based on very different ideals than, say, the Declaration of Independence.” [Mr. Stephens gives no indication of where he obtained the quote.  Sloppy journalism WSJ.]


Mr. Spencer’s vision may not be Mr. Bannon’s.  But the new found political power of the latter will inevitably open channels for the former.

 

That’s an interesting quote.  For those not aware Tablet Ezine is a rabid anti-Trump orthodox Jewish site that promotes the ethno-State of Israel that has very different ideals than, say, The Declaration of Independence.  So Mr. Stephens isn’t against ethno-States in principle he merely opposes a European ethno-State.  Such bigotry on the page of the WSJ!!!!

He ends his quote with the paranoid fear that Mr. Bannon is ‘inevitably opening channels’ for a European ethno-State.  G-d forbid.  Watch out! There’s an anti-Semite coming.  Or even more fearsome creatures, the Godzilla of all monsters:

 

In “The Second Coming” Yeats asked, “What rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Bethlehem to be born?”  The answer may yet turn out to be the likes of Steve Bannon and his ugly little litter of neo-nationalists.


Look again Mr. Stephens, re-read Poe’s The System Of Dr. Tarr And Professor Fether.  Those aren’t monsters coming Mr. Stephens, those are the asylum keepers escaped to put the hot house loonies back in their bins.  Worse luck still, hey?

Thursday, November 17, 2016

The Constitution Vs. Foreign Invasion


The Constitution Vs. Foreign Invasion

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Wonder of all wonders.  The Trump presidency may be the first in history to do what it promised.  Kris Kobach of the administration is reported by the hostile press to suggest that the Trump administration may require Moslems to register with the government as foreign agents.

Naturally the Liberals are agog that such a thing could happen rushing precipitously to the Constitution which they believe requires the protection of enemy operatives within US borders.  My supposition is that they don’t read well while having the weakest intellectual faculties.  Why do they suppose that any government, Constitution or no, must allow enemy paramilitaries to operate freely in its territory?

One expects nothing from Liberals, and gets it, but this attitude boggles the imagination.  On what grounds are we to tolerate the bombing of a marathon race, the murder of fifty people at a nightclub or the shooting up of a Christmas party?

On what grounds are we to dismiss the ranting of a Moslem ‘scholar’ who says that the Moslems are going to take over the country and impose the jizya tax on Christians and if they won’t pay it, fight them?  In Moslem terminology you can read  ‘Christian’ for non-Moslem.

Thank god we have a President who isn’t going to sit idly by or encourage this to happen while Liberals dither over whether it is Constitutional  to allow invaders to occupy the country.

It seems only yesterday that these same Liberals were screaming that the Constitution was antiquated and should have no force.

First and Second Amendments?  What First and Second Amendments?  They shrilled.

Obama may have been a Moslem who wished for a Moslem State with Sharia law but the US has ejected him and his acolyte Clinton.  It’s a New Day, a New Hope and Change that We can believe in.  Send the Moslems packing.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

You Can't Always Get What You Want


You Can’t Always Get What You Want,

(But if you try sometimes, you might

Find what you need.)

by

A Crude Sort Of Nationalist

 

Oh, yes.  The results of the election took the Left by surprise.  It didn’t take the Right by surprise.  I knew from day one that Trump would win and never wavered.  Back then around day one when the race began I was what Obama, taking the high road, called a ‘Domestic Terrorist’.  Just today I learned that according to  High Road Barry I’m  ‘a crude sort of Nationalist.’  Keep an eye on me, I like the attention.  Personally, I’m not so sure I’m one or the other.  In my vanity I would consider myself a clear sighted globalist.  But then, what do I know.

When I say globalist I don’t mean in the narrow, constricted, constipated sense that High Road uses;  I mean in the expansive way that realizes that it doesn’t mean surrendering the country to fatuous trade organizations; I mean it in the sense that low cost producers are corrected from taking advantage of- I almost said exploiting- more advanced economies with higher wage and benefit structures.  Note that word benefits.  The low cost producers don’t provide their workers with any, a terrific advantage.  Those benefits are what make it so easy for citizens of low cost or no cost countries to migrate to where the bennies are.

So, like Trump, I believe in tariffs that balance out the production costs.  Probably what the High Road means by being a crude sort of Nationalist.  Well, if High Road is actually leaving I say God Speed at exit levels and have a nice journey and take your wife with you.  God, I’m tired of the sorority gal image.  I liked her better in the pictures of the high life girl visiting Spain.  Those jungle prints were revealing.  Then she came back to the US and got into her sorority drag again.  Queen of the hop.  Boppity bop be bop.

Which brings us to that other vile defamation going around- misogynist.  God, what a negative sexist term.  What does it mean in the mouths of Liberals- a man who won’t bow and scrape before the eternal feminine?  Talk about being afraid of ‘strong’ women, those crazy feminists are afraid of strong men.  Masculinity is at a premium these days and why?  I don’t apologize for it.  Walk like a man my son.  Trump beats that femmy High Road and somehow he managed to snare a snappy wife, then another and then yet another.  That man knows women.  Obama?  Well, there are those persistent rumors.

Then our friend over at the Wall Street Journal, Peg Noonan, is all a-tremble at the Trump triumph.  She apparently thinks something startling is going to happen; it isn’t.  Oh, there will be a shift in attitude, that will be beneficial, a slight move to the Right, but after being a New York Liberal for seventy years I don’t expect anything major from Trump, no 8.1 on the Richter scale.

I hope that Trump honors his Chinese and immigration stances but we will have to see.  He’s already said the sexist crap is settled law so the tranny population should sky rocket; our kindergartners will continue to be trained to perverted sexual practices.  That ought to solve the late term abortion problem.  No conception, no problem.

I could easily go on a ramble, but I’m going to call it here.  If High Road is really going to check out I’d like to give him a heartfelt so long, it’s been good to know you.   Let me recommend a good parallel universe.

But then, I remember he categorically said that Donald Trump will never serve as President of the United States.  What’s the trick?

Monday, November 14, 2016

A Review: Lion Feuchtwanger, Jud Suss, Book And Movie


 

A Review:  Lion Feuchtwanger, Jud Suss-book, Jew Suss-movie And The German Movies Jud Suss And The Rothschilds In The Context Of The Times.

by

R.E. Prindle

Lion Feuchtwanger 

This is a review of the novel Jew Suss by Lion Feuchtwanger.  The review will place Feuctwanger’s novel in the context of the times it was written, that is the twenties and thirties of the twentieth century with a view of the author’s intent.
 
 

While the novel is of great importance to the period in question perhaps the name Lion Feuchtwanger is unfamiliar to most.   As an historian, prior to reading Jud Suss I had seen the name mentioned frequently but I knew nothing further of him.  Feuchtwanger while not logorrhaeic wrote a corpus. Most of it is historical concerning the greatness of the Jews.  He wrote a trilogy- 1500 pages- around the character of Josephus and the Jewish-Roman war of the first and second centuries AD.

Perhaps it was the times and the Jewish propaganda machine that credits Feuchtwanger with the mantle of the greatest historical novelist.  He isn’t close to that or even a contender, he makes laborious reading at best.  As his reputation has disappeared that speaks for itself.  Nevertheless, Jud Suss was a best seller both in Germany and abroad.  My copy from the English reprint publisher Hutchinson bills itself as of the 158th thousand.  One wonders.

The book was published in Germany in 1925.  It tells in a sort of fantasia of the career of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer who was the court Jew to the Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg, the companion State of Bavaria in the South of Germany.  I am sure that few people today know anything of Suss Oppenheimer if they have even heard of him.  He is little known outside Germany while I have found no study of Suss in English.
 
Joseph Suss Oppenheimer

The book revived an interest in Germany so that it was notorious from 1925 to the German defeat in 1945.

Suss Oppenheimer was the man who reorganized Jewry in the eighteenth century giving them a sense of direction in the evolution of modern Europe.  The contrast between the emerging Jew of Suss and the traditional Jew as represented by a Rabbi Landauer is one of themes Feuchtwanger develops.    This theme applies to the contemporary Germany of the period.

I don’t want this essay to be too disjointed but as the past is ever present in the present, for a proper understanding one has to meld the present with the past.  Feuchtwanger is well versed in Jewish history and lore.  He knows and understands the Jewish program.  In Jewish thinking the Jews are always distinct from and superior to the host people.  Thus, the Jew Suss Oppenheimer although essentially an employee of the Duke of Wurttemberg, Karl Alexander, he considers himself equal to and indeed preeminent over his employer.

At the end of the story when Suss has put the State into turmoil and the Duke lay dying Suss whispers into his ear, we could have been friends but you felt yourself preeminent when I was superior to you in every way.  Together what we may have accomplished with myself representing the aristocracy of money and you as the aristocrat of the soil.

Here Feuchtwanger gives away the Jewish conspiracy.  By commandeering the banking system they became not only equal to but superior to the landed nobility.  Who has money controls destiny.

Suss was the organizer of modern Jewry, he paved the way for the Rothschilds, ne Bauer, to be the near absolute lords of money beginning only a few year after Suss’ hanging.  Of course the Rothschild rise was made possible by the theft of the fortune of the Landgrave of Hesse Cassel during Napoleonic times.

As is common knowledge Nathan Rothschild was sent to England to exploit the textile manufacturing industry.  According to the current historian Niall Ferguson in his history of the Rothschilds using Rothschild archives, Nathan had a struggle to stay solvent resorting to a variety of devious practices including smuggling.  Then the Landgrave entrusted either his fortune or a large part of it to Mayer Rothschild the patriarch of the family who sent substantial sums to Nathan making him a banker and richest stock broker in the City.  From there within a very few years the Rothschilds became the lords of money gaining patents of nobility wherever they lived thus realizing Suss’ dream.  The Jews had become equal or superior to the European nobility.

In the interim between Suss’ and Feuchtwanger’s time the Jews had taken control of European and American currency through the Central banks, the Federal Reserve System in the United States.  Thus, as I interpret it in the sly conclusion of the Jew Suss Feuchtwanger  is celebrating what in 1926 looked like the triumph of the Jews over Germany and Euroamerica.  Essentially the Stateless Jews were the State from Russia across Europe to the United States.   Money had displaced both European nobility and statehood while Europe was in turmoil soon to be virtually destroyed by warfare.

Once again at the risk of confusing the issue it is necessary to go back in time again.  This time to 1666 in Europe.  As always the Jews were welcome nowhere by host countries.  In eleventh century Mesopotamia the Jews had been expelled.  The bulk of them migrated to Spain.  Then in the thirteenth century they were expelled from England, in the fourteenth century from France and in the fifteenth from Spain.  The Spanish migration had been to Africa, the Turkish Empire in the Middle East and increasingly into the Eastern European area that was to be called the Pale of Settlement.  They had been banned from the Muscovite land much earlier.  The German States now expelling them, letting them back in, banning again, etc.

In the seventeenth century in the extended Polish empire in the Ukraine where they made themselves pests the Ukrainians rebelled against the Poles and their Jewish allies causing mass destructions.  The Jews fled in numbers into Germany and Holland carrying their medieval vision of religion with them.  This was just prior to the career of Suss and the establishment of Court Jews.  Thus the German lands were in turmoil as the Jews struggled to establish themselves.

Becoming increasingly exasperated while blaming their woes on anti-Semitism rather than their own actions a Messiah arose in the seventeenth century Turkic states by the name of Sabbatai Zevi.  As the Jewish messiah is preeminently a military redeemer a great buzz of excitement was aroused amongst worldwide Jewry.  (The US does not yet figure in world politics).  Especially in Europe where the Jews were struggling to find a place.

History knows the Jews as violent brutal revolutionists, a people that nurses grievances and never forgets them.   Thus remembering the Amalekites, in the second century the Jews of Alexandria and Rhodes on a signal turned on their unsuspecting neighbors murdering about 250 K in each location committing horrid atrocities.  This set off a bloody reprisal in which Rome terminated the Jewish State.

Now in the seventeenth century just as European events were setting the Jews in turmoil Zevi’s messiahship was rising to a climax in 1666, that year was determined as the year of the redemption.  Thus as in Rhodes and Alexandria the Jews prepared to turn on their European neighbors murdering them wholesale, a genocide in hopes.  This is history and one suspects the history has survived into our times as well as Germany and Europe of the twenties and thirties.

The signal was to have been Zevi declaring the millennium in an audience with the Sultan in Turkey.  Instead of declaring himself the Messiah Zevi converted to Moslemism.  The revolution fizzled much to the dismay of the Jews.  Remember this occurred from say, 1660 to 1680.  Suss enjoyed his heyday in the four years from 1730-34 in the eighteenth century.  That is a mere fifty years from Zevi’s apostasy.  There must have living people who remembered those tumultuous times as Suss grew up.  Although Feuchtwanger doesn’t mention it, perhaps even his characters Isaac Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel.

Nor were those intervening five decades years of repose for the Jews.  The disappointment caused a movement toward a whole reorganization of Judaism.  On the Western edge of the Pale the Jewish visionary the BaalShemTov created the Hasidic sect that challenged Rabbinic Judaism while a disciple of Zevi, Jacob Frank, created the freak sect of Frankists or Sabbatians whose belief system taught that the Millennium would never come until the Jews had indulged all their evil impulses thus clearing their psyches of nothing but good impulses thus preparing them to receive their redemption.

At the same time the Elders put their heads together to come up with a plan in which the people themselves would be their own messiah renouncing individual messiahs.  So that the above was the Jewish background in which Suss arose and flourished.  Feuchtwanger was aware of it as there are descriptive references to it.

So, now, Feuchtwanger wrote his story in 1921-2 and published it in 1925.  Things in the Jewish world had progressed.  As Feuchtwanger describes it in his novel Suss, Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel have been working to get together the Jewish network from the four corners of Europe.  Suss represented the future of an open display of Jewish financial power while Landauer represent the traditional sub rosa power of money.  Rabbi Gabriel was a strange one.  He was a Jew who migrated to Holland where his prime identity lay but for his networking purposes he went in disguise as Ahasuerus, the Wandering Jew.  He actively claimed to be several hundred years old and the actual Jew who insulted Jesus.  The disguise amused the gentiles gaining their tolerance as he moved from place to place organizing. 

At Suss’ death in 1734 it was only about fifty years to the proclamation of Jewish emancipation by the French Revolution.  It was in 1806 that Napoleon overran Hesse-Cassell that the Landgrave made the Bauer/Rothschilds by entrusting his wealth to them.  From then to the 1897 Jewish Zionist convention in Vienna was only another ninety years.  It was then but sixteen years to 1913.

According to the American Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver the Elders had determined that the years 1913-28 were to be the years of the redemption as the Jewish Revolution at which time the Jews would kill their European neighbors and unlike 115 and 1666 succeed.  Six years after the Vienna Zionist convention the first Russian Revolution was attempted but failed.  Out of the convention and the first Revolution came the document known as The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion that outlined the Revolution that would succeed in Russia in 1917.

As a result of the European War of 1914-18  Europe was totally devastated and in turmoil.  The war that had engulfed Europe from Russian to England had destroyed the flower of European manhood.  The aftermath in Central and Eastern Europe consumed even more.  Once in power in Russia as Dostoyevsky predicted the Jews began killing the Russians.  Of course historians speak of Russian activities against the Jews while ignoring Jewish crimes.

When the news of Jewish atrocities reached Western Europe they became alarmed.  The Manchester Morning Post published a book, The World’s Problem that sounded the alarm.  The Jews were prepared.  It took relatively small effort to discredit the Protocols while having their opponents discredited as anti-Semites.

However, even though the German Communist Revolution failed Jews had thoroughly infiltrated the government while controlling German and international banking and the press while obtaining a significant number of university posts.  The Weimar Republic is remembered by Jews as almost realizing the hopes of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer and it is that that Lion Feuchtwanger is celebrating in his novel.

Feuchtwanger, in the Jewish manner, took himself very very seriously.  He believed he was a great, perhaps the greatest novelist, while being at the same time a seer or prophet.  In an interview of 1930 he asserted positively that things were under control and there would be no revolution in Germany.  Of course, in 1933 he learned differently.   Just as the Wurttembergers had turned on Suss so in 1933 the Germans turned on the Jewish people.  In a way then, Feuchtwanger was a prophet.

In the novel as well as in history Suss assumed the role of the dark, even black, eminence of the Duke Karl Alexander.  All his counsels were evil while given on the basis of three for him and one for the Duke.  Like Colonel Parker and Elvis the great lion’s share of the money earned by Elvis went into the Colonel’s pocket and the remainder into Elvis’.  So with Suss.  When Wurttembergers remonstrated with him Suss haughtily informed them they couldn’t hang him higher than the gallows.  As it turned out they could.  They had a special seldom used gallows thirty feet higher than the usual gallows.  Plus Suss was shut into an iron cage in which his body was exposed to the elements for years.  He had ably earned that level of hatred by his actions.

So Feuchtwanger pointed the way to the anger of Germany in which having no other recourse the Germans set about systematically exterminating them.  A gallows high indeed.  But, remember, the years 1913-28 were the years of redemption.  Just as the Jews in the immediate years following 1918 slaughtered millions in Russia and Hungary and would have in Germany had the revolution succeeded so the Germans were in peril as a people and it had nothing to do with any holocaust.  In 1940 a Jew from Newark, New Jersey, Theodore Kaufmann published a book called Germany Must Die.  In it he proposed to castrate all German males, thus Germans would disappear within a generation.  Genocide in another word.   This notion of castration reappeared in FDR’s talk as it became evident that the Germans would be defeated.  The Jews then were no less guilty in intent than the Germans.

Having no territories or armies the Jewish offensive had to be asymmetrical, that is psychological warfare.  They had the gifted Sigmund Freud to guide them.  Sigmund Freud’s role in guiding the destiny of the Jewish Revolution is suppressed but as my studies advance he assumes a much more central role.

As part of the asymmetrical warfare propaganda, of course, took first place.  Psycho-analysis itself was controlled by the Jews, almost a closed club although it had to represent itself as a universal science.  A science is universal so that Judaism already active in all countries from the Soviet Union to the Americas enjoying the advantage of the Trojan Horse of Communism also thrust themselves into science as a Trojan Horse perverting scientific disciplines into subjective Jewish propaganda.

Already in control of the print media in the Pan-Judaic superstate of Europe and America either by direct ownership or psychological control through the charge of anti-Semitism it only remained to gain control of emerging technologies such as movies and radio.  This was easily accomplished, the theater and movies certainly began as Jewish monopolies which, at least in the US, all radio networks were in their control from the beginning.

Thus by the twenties the Jews were in a position to direct the social and intellectual mores of society.  One no longer hears mores discussed as they once were even though mores control society even more than laws.  For instance there was no law against criticizing Jews, one can’t be punished for criticizing Jews in Court while Jews have established as a more that criticism of Jews is an unforgivable social faux pas so that any individual will be ostracized by his own people, blacklisted, deprived of employment having his entire future ruined.  A penalty no Court could inflict.  People have lost careers amounting to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars by the single accusation, that is accusation, no proof or trial required, and with no recourse to law.   Simple mechanics, street sweepers, had been rendered unemployable for life.

Using this immunity from criticism the Jews began an attack on the mores of the people of Pan-Judea.  They began defaming the heroes of the various cultures defaming them into ridiculous caricatures.  In the US the character of Thomas Jefferson, for instance, has been demolished, Washington also.  Having gotten the wedge in the whole of the American past has been reduced to one huge crime for which living White people are held wholly responsible and must be punished.

At the same time the media elevated insignificant Jews to positions of not only importance but extreme virtue.  It matters not that they were important out of all proportion in the slave trade or as slave owners.  They were Jews and all their crimes could be justified.

Thus when Feuchtwanger’s Jud Suss appeared in 1925 alert Germans immediately recognized its import, its attack on Germans and German mores.

While I am not familiar with the whole body of European Jewish writing it was also at this time that Emil Ludwig began writing derogatory biographies of Bismarck and Napoleon that drew the ire of European readers.  Feuchtwanger himself continued his sarcastic derogatory style in his next novel of 1930, Success, that ridiculed and mocked the society of his native Munich in much the same manner as Jud Suss.  He displayed  a contempt for European mores much as his contemporary Sigmund Freud was doing in his psychological treatises.  In films, the two Dr. Mabuse movies of Fritz Lang are worth noting.  I am unfamiliar with US and French efforts but in the US Gustavus Myers was turning out a long series of books denigrating American mores and customs from finance to the Supreme Court finally ending his career in 1942 with his History Of Bigotry In The United States.

So from the Soviet Union West to the Americas the asymmetrical war on the West was being very successfully waged.  The back of Western confidence and self-respect was broken.  In the great German book burning in which Jewish texts were destroyed Feuchtwanger’s earned prominence.

The war accelerated when the Nazis Party gained power in 1933.  Perhaps in support of that event Feuchtwanger began the movie script for Jud Suss that was released in that year in England under the title Jew Suss and in the US under the title Power.  Closely adhering to the book the movie was a vicious propaganda piece.

A number of propaganda movies celebrating Judaism in the lead up to the attempted Jewish seizure of power were such films as Erlich’s Magic Bullet, The Rothschilds, The Story Of Emile Zola and several B level anti-Nazi movies of the late thirties and early forties.  The chief irritant to the Nazis after Jud Suss was the US production of The Rothschilds.  While nearly everything noted here is currently available American The Rothschilds is not.  The movie apparently covered the Napoleonic period involving the Rothschild shipment of gold through France to aid Wellington in the Peninsular War.

When the Germans got around to answering these two propaganda films in the early forties with their own propaganda versions they were demeaned as, naturally, anti-Semitic.  The directors of the German Rothschild film covering the same events of the Jewish version was vilified after the war and the vilification continues to today.   The vilification of Veit Harlan, the director of this brilliant film, is carried to extremes although perhaps a tribute to his skill.

The Napoleonic episode is apparently still sensitive to the Rothschild family since the massive biography by Niall Ferguson only reaches to 1905 then pussy foots around the incident.  After pages of verbiage Ferguson refuses to come to any definite conclusion and he was given access to the family records and papers.

As these two films are key to Jewish the war I will attempt to deal with them in extenso.

The Jewish versions appeared first.  The Jew Suss was released simultaneously in England under that title and in the US titled Power.  The Rothschilds was released in the US under that name in 1934; whether it was distributed in England I don’t know but suspect so.  It must be remembered that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933 so that these two films have to be seen as acts of war, part of an extensive ongoing campaign.  For instance in 1937 the Dreyfus Affair in France of the 1890s was revived in the US film The Life Of Emile Zola.  Zola was a French novelist who championed the cause of Dreyfus.  Alfred Dreyfus was a Jew serving as a French military officer.  He was tried and found guilty of spying.  He was certainly guilty although probably not for spying for the Germans.  Like Johnathan Pollard in the US he was turning documents over to his fellow Jews.  He spent a number of years on Devil’s Island until with the help of Zola his conviction was overturned.  The affair was a serious issue that convulsed France and apparently still does as Roman Polanski is scheduled to direct another film sometime soon.  Apparently along with slavery we should all feel guilty of the indignity that Dreyfus suffered even though he was guilty.

For the Germans the two most galling films were Jud Suss and the Rothschilds.  They answered the former in 1940 and the latter in 1943.  As films both are superior to the Jewish versions although my opinion will be objected to as anti-Semitic, but facts are facts.  The English-American Jew Suss was written by Feuchtwanger thus closely following the outline of his book.  The German film presents the story from the perspective of the Germans who were afflicted with Suss’ policies.

Both films follow the general outlines of Suss’ actions and policies.  There is no real conflict between the two versions.  In both, as well as in fact, the Duke Karl Alexander gave Suss what seems to be in our terms a Power of Attorney giving him the full authority of the Duke to do as he pleased.  His will was the Duke’s will.  Seems rather extraordinary that a ruler would give such a thing but there you have it.  It is an inexplicable action of the Duke.  One can even imagine it as his essential abdication.  Certainly the Power Of Attorney gave him the right to depose the Duke.

In any case the Money  Power as represented by Suss was placed in a superior position over the temporal power of the Duke.

After the Duke’s death this presented a legal problem for the Wurttembergers because in fact Suss was acting in the Duke’s name.  Thus Suss was absolved of all responsibility.  Unlike Feuchtwanger’s two versions, book and movie, in the German version the Wurttembergers were driven into open rebellion.  In the German version there is no indication that the Duke was murdered by Suss but the Duke had some strange degeneration losing his will.  He surrendered his own will to Suss while the Duke’s wife and his advisors all seem to have been accomplices of Suss.  Perhaps he was a master hypnotist or else how explain it.  At the end of the German version the Duke is a drunk who when confronted by the rebels flies into a rage and has a stroke or heart attack.  Goes apoplectic as they used to say.

With his death Suss’ Power of Attorney loses its validity.  He is arrested and tried.  As stated, legally he was acting as the will of the Duke having no personal responsibility.  It is interesting to note though that German soldiers under orders, therefore having no will of their own, were held responsible by the Jews for following orders in the camps.  The law is the law until it isn’t.

The German problem then is that they are bound by the rule of law and cannot violate it so as they ponder it appears that Suss must go free.

However there is a law on the books making it illegal for a Jews to have intercourse with a German girl.  While in the book and Feuchtwanger’s movie Suss had mingled with many German women including the Duke’s wife in the German version he violates the daughter of the Privy Counselor the girl then drowning herself.  The law is the law and the penalty is death.  The Privy Counselor gets his due back (law is not vengeance) by exacting the prescribed death penalty.

In Feuchtwanger’s versions Suss’ daughter committed suicide to escape the attentions of the Duke.  Thus the Germans neatly reverse the situation.

Now, the German version released in 1940 was roundly condemned by the Jews as ragingly anti-Semitic; this is strange as neither the Jewish or German versions contest the facts of Suss’ activities.  The Jews happily admit Suss’ crimes.

Both movies were released before there was a hint of a holocaust so one is at a loss to explain the Jewish sensitivity, especially so as in the US in 1940 the book The Germans Must Die by Theodore Kaufmann called for the genocide of Germans.  The Germans were thoroughly outraged by the book and its positive reception in the US causing Goebbels to exclaim that the Germans would see who died first.  Perhaps the seeds of the holocaust were planted in German minds at that time.

Jud Suss then, was the reply to the English/American production of Jew Suss.  That left the equally galling movie from the German viewpoint of The Rothschilds to answer; this was done in 1943 when the Germans replied in kind dealing with the transport of gold to Wellington in Spain during the Peninsular War against Napoleon.  The event has been kept shrouded in mystery so the Jewish guilt must be enormous.

As noted the American film to which the Germans were responding is being kept off the market as of 10/12/16 so the only conclusion is that even by Jewish standards the incident is indefensible.  We will have to infer from the German film.

As there may be readers who are not familiar with the historical account it may be appropriate to give that briefly.

When Suss had organized the Jews into a functioning unit, the ‘united’ Jews continued to develop along with the emerging new money based economy of Europe.  Excluded from the old land based wealth the Jews were uniquely positioned to seize the money based economy.

As is shown in the German Rothschild film the peasantry and even the nobility had little familiarity with numbers and were easily bamboozled by fast talking Jews who had been usurers for centuries.  This is demonstrated in both the Jewish and German versions.

The French Revolution occurred forty-nine years after Suss’ death freeing the Jews from medieval restrictions; this was called the emancipation.  The Europeans expected the Jews to abandon their parochial ways and become one people with the Europeans.

As Feuchtwanger said the Jews expected to become a sovereign entity as the Lords of Cash.

There were hurdles before them but they were swept aside when Napoleon in 1806 annexed the German principality of Hesse-Cassell.  The Landgrave of Hesse-Cassell had amassed the largest fortune in Europe by renting out his male subjects as soldiers to other States.  In the book Suss’ advises Duke Karl to hire soldiers to suppress the Duke’s subjects.  These most likely would have come from Hesse-Cassell.

The Landgrave then used the receipts to loan money to the other States and people amassing mortgages all over Europe.  Napoleon wanted the money; to avoid his getting it the Landgrave enlisted the aid of his Court Jew, Mayer Rothschild ne Bauer who secreted the fortune.  Some believe the Landgrave entrusted the whole of his fortune to Rothschild.  Niall Ferguson in his history is ambiguous waltzing around the issue.

In the German movie the Landgrave entrusts Rothschild with 650K in negotiable bills.  Changing the issues from the Landgrave to the English Jew Montifiore Mayer sent them to his son Nathan who was stationed in England.

A few years earlier Mayer had sent his ‘five arrows’ of legend to various capitals: Nathan to England, James to Paris and the three others to Berlin, Vienna and Naples.

Nathan began in the textile business in Manchester which apparently was too hard for him so he resorted to the criminal means of smuggling and other subterfuges.  The smuggling experience would stand him in good stead.  Nathan had also positioned himself in the City.  The London district known as the City is equivalent to Wall Street in the US.

When Napoleon invaded Spain the English countered by sending Wellington and an army to Spain to counter the invasion.  Operating from England the provisioning of the army was difficult.  To fund Wellington it was necessary to send gold.  The sea route was considered too precarious so an overland route was deemed necessary.  Overland meant passing through Napoleon’s citadel of France.

England was short of gold but a shipment arrived from India that was sold at auction.  The English financiers were a sort of cartel so they expected to obtain the gold.  However with the 650K in paper securities from his father (according to the German film) Nathan was in a position to outbid the cartel which he did.

He then had the only gold available to send to Wellington.  He agreed to do this for a handsome fee.  Napoleon who was retreating from Russia was defeated and sent to Elbe.  From there he would soon return to France assemble an army and meet Wellington at Waterloo.

This was a second opportunity for the Rothschilds that far surpassed the gold purchase and its transport to Spain.  This stunt would be worth in excess of ten million pounds making the Rothschilds the wealthiest family in Europe while setting the stage for the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

The price of government securities in England would depend on the results of Waterloo.  A loss, stocks down, a win stocks up.  A window of opportunity would exist between the time of the outcome and the time the news reached England.  No phones, no telegraph, no internet.  Nathan Rothschild saw his chance to cheat the people of England and he took it.  He had his agents at Waterloo to record the outcome, some say he used passenger pigeons, some say not. In any event his agents got the news of Napoleon’s defeat to him first.   Nathan created a panic by circulating the story that Wellington had been defeated.  Then when prices were at their lowest, apparently fire sale prices, he bought as much as he could.  When the news of victory arrived it was too late for the cartel.   Nathan had become the richest man in England.

Perhaps that is why as of 11/5/16 the US version of the Rothschilds is unavailable.  The facts coincide with the German version too closely.  In any event if the US version is released you may be sure it will be heavily edited, quite unlike the original.

Of course the cry is that the German versions of both movies are anti-Semitic rather than historical.  At least in the case of the Rothschilds the facts are incontrovertible.  The smuggling of the gold through France was actually known by the French authorities at the time.  The police under the direction of Fouche were not fools.  Fouche himself is credited as being brilliant.  Nor are German historians fools.  They are more than competent.  Before the two world wars German universities were considered tops in the world.  German scholars stood out as the most brilliant stars in the firmament.  German music and literature was unsurpassed.

Beginning with the Weimar Republic and Jewish dominance standards slipped while German hatred in the West led by the Jews libeled everything Germans did.  The point being there is no reason to doubt the scholarship on which the German Rothschild film is based.  The Germans are speaking from intimate knowledge of the Jews as indeed the controversy from Suss to 1950 indicates.  You need only to read Jewish-German literature to see the contempt with which Jews treat the Germans.  But if you control the propaganda as the Jews do, black may be made white and vice versa.

Hitler in his Mein Kampf clearly delineates the problem.  As he wrote, that if he and the Volkists failed their heads would roll in the sand.  This prediction was proven in the years following the defeat.  The war did not end with the allied victory but continued to rage one sidedly over the prostrate Germany for at least five years.

During 1943 the year the German Rothschild was released the extermination of the Jews was reaching maximum efficiency.  Now, we must take the Jewish threat to exterminate the Germans through castration seriously.  Had FDR not died in ’45 before hostilities ceased it is quite possible he might have ordered such an action.  He was surrounded by Jewish advisors who certainly would have encouraged him most notably his Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr., who had already usurped significant Executive powers not unlike Suss himself from the Duke.

To put the matter into perspective then, the German extermination of the Jews may be seen as a preemptive strike.  The Jews have always favored preemptive strikes.  So while in 1943 the Germans had the upper hand a short time later the Jews would gain the upper hand over a completely bombed over destroyed Germany flattened by tens of thousands of bomb raids.

Fortunately there were saner heads in Washington who were aghast at the lunacy of what was now the Morgenthau plan, Kaufmann having been forgotten.  Thus, when Truman replaced FDR Morgenthau found he could no longer give orders to him as he could FDR.  When Morgenthau haughtily told Truman the he would do what Morgenthau said or Morgenthau would quit Truman merely held his hand out to accept the resignation.  At that point a great deal of the Jewish influence prominent under FDR evaporated.

But the Jewish influence had been cultivated since 1933 and was so embedded that its actions persisted.  As is not too well known Bernard Baruch, an arch-Jewish villain in this period, had cultivated his acquaintance with Eisenhower from the days of the Bonus March in 1934.  Eisenhower revered Baruch saying he had sat at his feet for twenty-six years while considering him the wisest man he knew.  The influence was so incredibly effective that Eisenhower initially ordered the extermination of the surrendered German troops.  During the winter of 1946 one of the coldest on record he left entire German armies in the open with no cover and the scantiest of rations.  He ordered that any German civilian who tried to pass food through the fence be shot dead.

The allies also perpetrated enormous crimes against the German people.  The French and Americans turned hordes of African troops and American Negroes loose to rape German women at will, not unlike Mama Merkel and the Moslems today.  The French took tens of thousands of German troops as slave labor and worked them to death.

Perhaps you say the Germans did the same but even if they did were we, the children of light, that kind of people?  Well, yes we were although it was never reported in the papers.  I grew up believing Americans were sainted people who went into battle with a holy fervor bearing the banner of a righteous Lord before us.  I grew up believing no American soldier would commit an act of injustice or cruelty.  I was lied to.

The truth has taken decades to reach me.  I should have known better because as great or greater crimes have been committed on American soil by Americans.  I was raised to believe that Sherman’s March from Atlanta to the Sea was a great military feat.  The actions of General Sheridan in the Shenandoah Valley or the evacuation of half a dozen counties around Kansas City were never mentioned but all three were horrendous crimes.  General Grant’s demand for an unconditional surrender was just that, a turning over of American minds and bodies to do with as the North liked; hence the horrors of Reconstruction.  The Southern Whites were essentially reduced to slavery.  We are that kind of people.

Thus when Roosevelt demanded unconditional surrender from the Germans it was his intent to murder the entire nation if he chose;  we are that kind of people.

Despite Obama’s assurances to the contrary he himself has declared opposition to his rule to come from Domestic Terrorists, his acolyte, Hillary Clinton has disparaged dissidents as a Basket of Deplorables, really having no right to exist.  Sorry, Barry, we are that kind of people.  Opposition to them is irredeemably bad.  The Jew, Noel Ignatiev, and various Negro leaders have demanded the extermination of the White race; therefore setting the staging in place for the extermination of half of the White population.  We are that kind of people.  We’ve done it before.

The slaughter of Germans by the allies and Soviets in the East, US, Brits and French in the West was incredible, far exceeding any German war crimes.  The post-war assault was led by the Jews.  While a small percentage of the allied peoples, the so-called war crimes trials were staffed disproportionately with Jews.  Even though the Jews first declared war against the Germans, and even though the Jews first called for the extermination of the Germans backed by the full power of the Soviet Union and the US, France and England, as in WWI the Germans were declared the aggressor nation.

Even though the Jews were murdering their so-called British allies throughout the Middle East at the exact same time the war crimes trials were held, even though the Jews in the US sent out teams of man-hunters to track down innocent men and women they deemed anti-Semites in an extra-legal manner the Jews called themselves the victims.

Even though the Jews were punishing Germans they set their man-hunters to punish the US for the ‘crime against humanity’ of not demanding a cessation of hostilities until the entire Jewish population of Europe had been removed from the hostilities to the safety of the US.  Their determination to exterminate Whites today is based on this perceived injustice.

As unremitting as ever the Jews deeply resented the German version of the Jud Suss movie.  The key Germans were tried and found guilty, some committed suicide, some were hanged outright, somewhat reminiscently of Suss, while some were subjected to cruel and unusual punishments.  The children of the German leaders were treated like animals deprived of all humanity, they were not allowed education or the right to live their lives.

Over the decades Jewish man-hunters tracked down totally insignificant German soldiers to be imprisoned or killed by judicial murders.  The man-hunters violated all international law and the rights of countries such as Argentina professing themselves to be a holy people above human laws.

Veit Harlan, the director of the superb film Jud Suss was deprived of work and hounded from pillar to post.  He had committed no crime for which he could be tried or convicted.  The movie Jud Suss was a historical film based on real incidents, in its general outline it differed in no substantial way from the Jews’ own version.  History is history and cannot be denied.  The Jewish version lauded Suss as a great Jewish hero; the German version condemned him as a great criminal.  There was no anti-Semitism so -called.

The Jews merely consider it a crime to criticize them in any way.  It is time for the dead past to bury its dead.  It is time for the Jews to leave their so-called grievances behind.  There are no innocents.  The Jews are their own problem.  They merit no special handling.