Pt. X, Time Traveling With R.E. Prindle: GWM Reynolds' The Necromancer

Part X, Time Traveling With R.E. Prindle

A Review

Geo. W.M. Reynolds’ The Necromancer

by

R.E. Prindle

Reynolds’ writing system was such that he could write each installment of the Mysteries of the Court of London in seven hours leaving the rest of the week open.  Thus he had a seven hour work week leaving time to do a myriad other things including writing other books.  He says his mind was bursting with ideas.  He had a powerful compartmentalized mind so that he could keep two or three novels going at the same time so that in the year of 1851 he wrote his installments for the Court of London and The Seamstress, Pope Joan, Kenneth and the Necromancer,  the last two extending into 1852.  We are going to examine here his very fine novel, The Necromancer, or perhaps one might rename it the Magician.

If as seems evident that every novelist is writing his own life whether consciously or unconsciously, it is also true that the novelist reflects his own time.  Ostensibly the Necromancer takes place in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries but I think we can abstract a story about what was happening currently in his day.  This will require much background work.

As is uppermost in every twenty-first century White mind the question of is the author in any way anti-Semitic, non, Feminist, a racist, and as it is expressed a Homophobe.  We are going to explain the Necromancer as an explanation of Semitism in the England of Reynolds and ignore the other bete noirs.  You have been forewarned.

Whether you consider Semites, that is Jews, as a religion, a nation, a people or whatever they are an economic, political and social force working solely for Jewish interests to the exclusion of all others.  Jews consider themselves a nation and a people.  The period from 1814 through the nineteenth century saw the rise of the Jewish people as the pre-eminent people of Great Britain.  The rise was especially prominent from 1815 to 1860, the period most important of Reynolds novelist life.

It is not possible that he didn’t note the situation and if he didn’t mention it directly, which he doesn’t, then there must be a reason.  Why would he have to resort to a parable such as The Necromancer?  The answer was that even at that time there were penalties to writing ethnographical studies such as Reynolds’ that did not show Jews to critical advantage.

If one found it necessary to include Jewish characters they must be portrayed in the most benevolent light.  Reynolds does mention Jewish characters but in a peculiar way.  He lauds them as long suffering, unfairly victimized as a people but then he invariably displays them as what are called anti-Semitic stereotypes.  Thus the pawn broker in Wagner, the Wehr Wolf.

He is depicted as a totally inoffensive person, obsequious to the extreme as a persecuted member of the bedeviled people.  After these laudatory comments Reynolds then pictures a character bearing all the so-called Semitic tropes.  He changes the stones on the pawned diamonds to paste, which Reynolds justifies by his peoples ages long persecution, as well as other criminal acts.  It would seem that Reynolds knew the score.

The odd thing, since Jewish activity was at a height is that Reynolds makes no reference to Jewish economic or banking activities.  Let us do a brief survey of where matters stood at the time.  In 1815 Nathan Rothschild seized control of English currency and the Bank of England.

  To explain:

A famous European and Jewish canard is that of father Mayer Amschel Rothschild and his five arrows, that is, his five sons.  They were dispatched to European capitals to form a powerful network covering the continent and England.  Nathan Rothschild was sent to Manchester to engage in the booming textile industry.  Nathan was no businessman and could not succeed in textiles.  He therefore turned to crime becoming a smuggler which would turn out to fortuitously make his fortune.

In 1806 Napoleon was conquering the German States, moving in on the Margrave of Hesse-Cassel.  The Margrave was fabulously wealthy.  He wanted to conceal his wealth from Napoleon who was more than eager to appropriate it.  The Margrave then employed his Court Jew, Mayer Amschel Rothshild, to conceal it.  Mayer sent a substantial portion of it to Nathan who by this time was floundering around as a banker.  The money immediately established Nathan as a financial force.  At that time the British were engaging Napoleon in the Iberian Peninsular War.  Wellington the British general in the Peninsula needed cash desperately but the usually inventive English didn’t know of a secure way to get the money to him.  Nathan was then used to transport the money.  Using his, by this time, well developed smuggling skills in conjunction with his brother arrow, James, in Paris, they delivered the mail.

This was known to the French authorities as Fouche, the very clever Minister of Police, was aware of exactly how it had been done.  The method is well demonstrated in the German Movie, The Rothschilds.  So Nathan and his fellow Jews scored a bundle on that caper.

Nathan’s most outstanding feat that brought England to its knees was his capture of the currency after Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo.  He spread the rumor that Napoleon had won Waterloo causing a stupendous sell off that drove prices far down.  While others sold Nathan bought.  Then his special couriers raced to London to carry news of the English, or allied, victory.  Prices bounced back but by then using the fabulous wealth of the Margrave of Hesse Nathan owned huge amounts of securities that he sold at magnificent profit thus securing the base of the Rothschild dynasty, still going strong eight generations on.

To report this astonishing feat in history tends to mitigate the reaction of the Brits when they learned how they had been diddled out of the ruling of their country for Rothschild had pulled an astonishing cheat.  Reynolds who was very well informed across the board must have known this but was constrained from portraying it for fear of Jewish retaliation which even was formidable.

We are now moving to the 1840s and Nathan who had passed was succeeded by Lionel Rothschild as the scion of the family.  A most formidable and dangerous antagonist.

At this time young Benjamin Disraeli (1804-81) was attempting to establish himself as a literary wizard before entering politics.  He had already written many novels when in 1844 he wrote Coningsby, Sybil in 1845 and Tancred in 1847.  In Coningsby he laid bare the Jewish influence in European affairs when he wrote that the world was actually governed by different people behind the scenes than the public imagined.  Thus he led the reading public to believe that the apparent rulers were mere operatives of others, that is, the Jews.

These three political novels made more of a stir than his earlier romances had so that it seems reasonable that Disraeli, Coningsby at least, had been read by Reynolds by 1851.  In Coningsby Disreali lauds his Jewish mastermind as the most astounding human being since Adam.  The character was based on the real life Right Honourable Lionel Freiherr Rothschild.  (1808-1879) Named Sidonia in the novel.

Lionel, Lion-el means Lion of the Lord or God, what we might say, Defender of the Faith in Christian terms.

The Jews since Nathan had owned the State of England but they as a different religion from the Anglicans suffered political and religious disabilities.  It was Lionel’s mission to remove them in which mission he was successful.

In 1847 he was the first Jew to be elected to Parliament.  This was success but it would also have absorbed Lionel as just another member.  He wanted more.  He in essence did not want to be absorbed as an English member of the House of Commons but as an autonomous Jew.  To be sworn in he had to take an oath of Christian formulation.  This he refused to do wishing to be sworn in as a Jew.

In order to accommodate him this would have required a changing of the rules with long term consequences.  Accordingly Lord Russell introduced a Jewish Disabilities Act to change the rules.  In 1849 when the Act failed the German-Jewish Baron Lionel Rothschild resigned his seat.  But still determined he won a bye election to keep his campaign going.  Returning he still refused to swear on the New Testament demanding the Jewish or Old Testament.  The oath still required him to say:  ‘Upon the true faith of a Christian.’  He refused to do so on the grounds that Christianity was not the true faith, Judaism was.  Once again he was compelled to resign his seat.

In 1852 he tried to bull his way through but once again was denied.  Finally in 1858 Lionel Rothschild forced through the oath changes.  Refusing to be bareheaded as required by English custom he demanded to wear his yarmulke  or skull cap and instead of saying ‘on the true faith of a Christian’ he was allowed to say ‘so help me Jehovah.’

Thus he became the first Jewish member of the House of Commons but the first Jew in the House rather than an English member of the Jewish faith.  Thus in this long battle to be seated Lionel changed the nature of the country into a country of Englishmen and nearly autonomous Jews.  Already in control of English currency the Jews would now aspire to political power while moving freely through society ostensibly equal but actually superior having all English rights as well as autonomous Jewish rights that were denied the English.

Thus Disraeli’s astonishing Sidonia/Lionel cleared the way for Disraeli to serve in the Commons but also to become the Prime Minister; the intermediary between the English people and their Sovereign.

These activities were not carried on in a vacuum or beneath the observance of interested parties of which Reynolds was one.  While he was only observing the struggle up to 1851-52 when he wrote the Necromancer the writing was on the wall.  No doubt Reynolds had read Disraeli’s Coningsby and had watched Lionel Rothschild’s maneuvering.  Being a novelist it was easy for him to shadow forth the denouement that occurred in 1858.

My reading of the Necromancer reflects Reynolds’ version of what was happening.  Thus his protagonist Lionel Danvers is Lionel Rothschild.  As an historical novelist he then creates a fictional history of the Danvers/Rothschild story.  He combines the five arrows into one.  As was commonly thought at the time the Jews were Satanic thus Danvers had sold his soul to Satan for a period of a hundred fifty years so and with the due date imminent it was necessary for Danvers to honor his commitment to Satan to redeem his soul.

Danvers existed under several names and guises as he was able to shape shift to any age at any time.  Thus at various periods he was the middle aged Walter, a mature Lionel Danvers and a boyish Reginald or Conrad. 

Even though he had sold his soul to the devil, Satan had given him an escape clause in that if he could find six virgins who would do anything for him, even die, he would take those six souls in exchange for Danvers’.  For some reason I always read Danvers in the French form of D’enfer.  Thus Danvers becomes The Lion Of the Lord of Hell.  Whether correct or not it certainly fits.

Now, Lionel Danvers to use that name of his existence, had all the wealth of Europe at his command.  While ostensibly an English Lord he spent all his time on the continent where he had the greatest concentrations of wealth in addition to his very large holdings in England.  For him money had no other meaning than to buy power in whatever form it took by any means necessary.

In his Walter incarnation, his first, as the clearest example, Walter shows up in Genoa where he befriends the scion of the Landini trading family.  He then bestows, not as a loan but for safe keeping interest free, an incredible fortune that Landini can use without any restrictions for his own benefit on the condition that whenever Danvers appears the Landinis are to return his money in full on demand or they become his slaves.

Naturally the Landinis being astute traders enjoy enormous success for several generations.  Even though Danvers has never returned they still maintain his fortune.  Each successor has been made aware of his obligation so that not only the trust is available ready to honor at any time but also interest.  However suddenly the worst fortune descends on them and all their deals begin to sour, whole argosies are lost at sea.  Danvers chooses this moment to return and demand his money.  The demand can’t be honored.

But, the Landinis have a beautiful virgin daughter, Bianca.  Danvers courts her, wins her heart and they set a date to be married.  In the meantime, as debtors to Danvers, the Landinis have become his slaves.  They are ordered to go to London and start a jewelry house, which they do.

Before leaving the marriage is arranged between Walter and Bianca.  Before the marriage Danvers carries Bianca off to no one knows where.  They both just vanish.  Bianca becomes the first of the virgins sacrificed to Satan by Danvers.  But, of course, the details that can be revealed here are mysteries to the reader.

Bianca had been abducted to Danvers ruined castle on the Isle of Wight.  In the secret chamber where Danvers murders the women a score card is on the wall in fiery letters, thus Bianca becomes virgin soul #1, five more to go.

As the story opens Lionel Danvers is sacrificing his fifth, Clara Manners.

One of the deepest mysteries in this astonishingly deep book is the problem of Musidora Sinclair who Lionel has selected as his sixth victim.  He seems to have had a singular attachment to the girl.  Musidora had been a charming girl but at the age of seventeen  she became of a very icy temperament unmoved by anyone or anything.  As it turns out Lionel had attempted to lead her to his secret chamber, she lived on the Isle of Wight, but she got cold feet on the way to the chamber and fled.  This event turned her heart cold.  Now, after having despatched Clara Manners he decides to try again to make Musidora his final victim.

I take Musidora to mean Golden Song or music. Whether right or wrong, she is.

Lionel now has a problem because Musidora won’t allow him near her.  Fortunately Lionel has a plan B.  He will impersonate King Henry VIII, during whose reign the story takes place at this point, and wed her.  Unfortunately her beauty overwhelms him and he impregnates her (another mystery) thus destroying her virginity.  Even Lionel Danvers was not so stupid that he didn’t know that it was impossible to diddle Satan.

For Reynolds the story of the impersonation of Henry III is the central point of the story.  Between Nathan and Lionel Rothschild a shadow government had been forming in England.  While Queen Victoria was the apparent ruler at this time the actual rulers were, as Disraeli had written, other than the seeming rulers.  Lionel lived till 1879 when he died at the age of seventy.

Granting that Disraeli was accurate then whatever power the shadow rulers had at the time, their power has gone on increasing to the present day when Evelyn Rothschild wields the power behind the throne.  Prior to the Communist Revolution of 1917 Rasputin was deemed the power behind the Russian throne.  He was also thought to be conspiring with the Germans.  As it happened Rasputin had a Jewish secretary and we must suppose that the secretary had ties to other Jewish revolutionaries so that he was able to pass information to them much as Dreyfus had done in France in the 1890s.

In all probability the German agents Rasputin was thought to be conspiring with was actually being done by his Jewish secretary.  The secretary would have been very intimate with Rasputin and would have had strong control over what information Rasputin received while having access to all or most of Rasputin’s info and plans.  Thus Through Rasputin the Jews would have been able to influence the Czarina and through the Czarina the Czar.

In the US during the same period, the Wall Street speculator Bernard Baruch would become the actual co-president of Woodrow Wilson free to issue commands on his own authority subject only to correction by Wilson himself and he and Wilson were of like minds.  So, at the crucial time of the Revolution both Russia and the US were subject to Jewish discipline.

Be that as it may, is it any coincidence that Lionel Danvers and Lionel Rothschild bore the same Christian name?  I think not.  Reynolds is trying to tell us something.  So Lionel Danvers having circulated rumors that he was dead or on the continent set about to realize his lust on the body of Musidora Sinclair while posing as Henry VIII.

It will be remembered that at this time Henry was seeking a divorce from his Spanish wife Catherine, but it had not yet been achieved.  Danvers has to fool Musidora into believing he, impersonating Henry, had succeeded in obtaining that divorce.  First Danvers has to lure Musidora from her retreat on the Isle of Wight.  He has a relative couple of Musidora living in the royal city of Greenwich invite Musidora to come for and extended visit to their castle.  Then he finds a probable excuse for Henry to be a guest of the Earl and Countess Grantham, Musidora’s relatives.

There is some hint that Danvers magically transformed himself into a duplicate form of Henry.  I don’t think that was necessary.  At this point in history but few people would have seen Henry.  So, all that Danvers would have had to have done is bought some clothes royalty would have worn and developed the persona.  Of course Musidora knew Danvers well as a young girl and ought to have been able to identify his voice.  But, this is Reynolds’ story and the disguise was complete although their was some uncertainty accepting face values.

Nevertheless Henry/Danvers showered Musidora with expensive gifts including a set of very expensive diamonds.  It will be remembered that the Landinis from Genoa had been running a jewelry shop in London for about a hundred years.

Eventually, with continued prodding from the Granthams, who were completely fooled, Danvers/Henry break Musidora down and she agrees to marry the faux monarch.  However suspicions remain and the strictest safeguards are taken.  Musidora demands to see the papal bull nullifying Henry’s marriage to Catherine which matter was not resolved at the time. 

Danvers has one forged.  As three papal seals are needed Danvers obtains authentic seals.

As a political operative he has suborned numerous members of Henry’s household putting them on the payroll and so has one obtain seals from an authentic papal communication.  The officiating priest is fooled and really has no choice but to marry Musidora and Danvers/Henry.  Danvers cannot allow Musidora to circulate or talk about her marriage so he swears her to secrecy about the whole affair.

Nevertheless Henry learns of the fraud and swears his informers to secrecy because he doesn’t want the public to know that a shadow King Henry is loose in the kingdom.  Reynolds here is describing the actual political condition in England that a second monarch is running the kingdom by secretive measures.  This answers to Disraeli’s claim that others than the seeming rulers are directing affairs.

In fact Disraeli himself will become Prime Minister and facetiously and destructively make Victoria the Empress of India.  Disraeli was ostensibly a Christian having changed from Judaism to Anglican at the age of thirteen.  Thirteen is when a Jewish lad takes his Bar Mitzvah becoming a young man with a man’s prerogatives.  It is very likely the change to Anglicanism was deceitfully made with political motives in mind.  Disraeli became a Jew disguised as a Christian.

While there may be some objectors to my analysis one should note that Sir Piers Dunhaven the father of the second female victim had once had an extensive property in Cumberland but he had lost most of his property to usury.  As Christians were forbidden usury it follows that Jews using their monopoly in usury had stripped Sir Piers of his property.  There are subtle hints such as this to Lionel Danvers nationality.

What we have here then is an allegory of the subjection of England by the Jews according to Reynolds.  On that level this is the shadow meaning of the novel.

On another level this is a near perfect Gothic novel.  One is reminded of The Mysteries of Udolpho by Mrs. Radcliffe.  As he was an old admirer of Mrs. Radcliffe I’m sure that Reynolds had Udolpho in mind as he wrote this.  The story is also first class mystery and would beat out Willkie Collins for longest mystery story.  And, Reynolds keeps the mystery going to the very end.  Who could have guessed that Marian Bradley, Danvers last possible chance to beat the devil was his and Musidora’s daughter?  Didn’t see that one coming did we?

The story is plotted out perfectly.   When we are shown the glowing signboard with the illuminated names and the blank spaces we have to wonder.  That was the first mystery and the finest first mystery explained.  This list of victims also gave Reynolds his opportunity to tell six tales and he loves to tell those tales.

Then there is the mystery of Danvers and where he gets his inexhaustible supply of money.  His fortunes, not just a fortune but fortunes, come from over all Europe and England.  An historical question often asked is how do Jews when expropriated and expelled out of one locality show up in a new one and immediately, as it seems, regain their wealth.  The solution to that one is easy—usury.  Aware that they may be expelled on short notice they kept jewels and portable wealth sewn into garments so that they could leave on amoment’s notice to resurface as wealthy elsewhere.

The Catholic Church and its opinion on money making money, that is usury, which is the objection to loaning on interest, penalized its own adherents and enfranchised the Jews who it politically disenfranchised.  Interest in those days wasn’t six or seven percent either.  Usury laws only came into existence much later.  In those days interest was as much as fifty percent compounded daily or more so you can see how the money lenders, Jews, cornered the money supply wherever they were.  The Danvers unlimited, renewed wealth must have come from usury, that is, legalized theft.

And Danvers applied his wealth artfully.  The ruse of entrusting money to someone to be reclaimed whenever on no notice is a sure way to entrap the party.  Reynolds was no dummy when it came to understanding ruses and ploys.  He studied hard. The ploy that the Marquis of Leveson used to entrap Venetia Trelawney was classic.

The Marquis wanted sex from Venetia that she didn’t want to give.  Not unlike Danvers, Leveson had unlimited funds that he didn’t mind losing so long as he obtained his desire.  So he presented Venetia with a magnificent string of pearls.  He told her he would redeem one or all at a time at a thousand pounds each on demand and with the last pearl she was his.  Venetia then accepted what she thought was a guarantee that she would never be in want and never have to succumb.

However the wily Marquis set a series of matters in motion to compel Venetia to redeem the pearls.  Borrowing from Eugene Sue’s Wandering Jew he has accomplices debauch the formerly steady husband of Venetia so that he turns to dissipation and gambling thus having to be bailed out frequently.  Venetia soon has to bed the Marquis.  The mysteries are usually tragic stories if you compassionate with the characters.

In this novel, while none of the characters has the memorability of the Resurrection Man from Mysteries of London, the whole ensemble of characters all work well together to create a memorable story.

The Necromancer is one of series of Satanic novels that Reynolds wrote from 1847 to 52.  The first being Wagner the Wehr Wolf, 1846-47, Faust in 1847, The Bronze Statue in 1849-50 and then the Necromancer in 1851-52.  Each is a beat the devil attempt on the part of the protagonist.  Satan is a tough customer and none succeed.

The end of Danvers is a classic much exploited in novels and movies.  Lionel (Walter, Reginald and Conrad) has lived for a hundred fifty years.  When his attempt on the sixth maiden fails and Satan comes to receive his due, Danvers shrivels from a handsome young man into a withered old man bursts into flames and disappears.

I don’t know whether Reynolds was the first to use this dodge or not, but it becomes a classic dodge thereafter.

The estimable critic Dick Collins considers the Necromancer to be his favorite Reynolds.  While I have now read twenty-five volumes of Reynolds I can’t place the volume ahead of the massive novels of The Mysteries of London, The Mysteries of the Court of London, nor, for that matter, The Mysteries of Old London.  The last has a special place in my esteem; yet, as I have said, The Necromancer as a super-natural Gothic novel I think it may be near perfection.  I’m sure that Mrs. Radcliffe would have been pleased with George’s effort.

Par XI of Time Travels With R.E Prindle follows.

A Review: Lion Feuchtwanger, Jud Suss, Book And Movie

 

A Review:  Lion Feuchtwanger, Jud Suss-book, Jew Suss-movie And The German Movies Jud Suss And The Rothschilds In The Context Of The Times.

by

R.E. Prindle

Lion Feuchtwanger 

This is a review of the novel Jew Suss by Lion Feuchtwanger.  The review will place Feuctwanger’s novel in the context of the times it was written, that is the twenties and thirties of the twentieth century with a view of the author’s intent.

 

 

While the novel is of great importance to the period in question perhaps the name Lion Feuchtwanger is unfamiliar to most.   As an historian, prior to reading Jud Suss I had seen the name mentioned frequently but I knew nothing further of him.  Feuchtwanger while not logorrhaeic wrote a corpus. Most of it is historical concerning the greatness of the Jews.  He wrote a trilogy- 1500 pages- around the character of Josephus and the Jewish-Roman war of the first and second centuries AD.

Perhaps it was the times and the Jewish propaganda machine that credits Feuchtwanger with the mantle of the greatest historical novelist.  He isn’t close to that or even a contender, he makes laborious reading at best.  As his reputation has disappeared that speaks for itself.  Nevertheless, Jud Suss was a best seller both in Germany and abroad.  My copy from the English reprint publisher Hutchinson bills itself as of the 158^th thousand.  One wonders.

The book was published in Germany in 1925.  It tells in a sort of fantasia of the career of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer who was the court Jew to the Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg, the companion State of Bavaria in the South of Germany.  I am sure that few people today know anything of Suss Oppenheimer if they have even heard of him.  He is little known outside Germany while I have found no study of Suss in English.

 

Joseph Suss Oppenheimer

The book revived an interest in Germany so that it was notorious from 1925 to the German defeat in 1945.

Suss Oppenheimer was the man who reorganized Jewry in the eighteenth century giving them a sense of direction in the evolution of modern Europe.  The contrast between the emerging Jew of Suss and the traditional Jew as represented by a Rabbi Landauer is one of themes Feuchtwanger develops.    This theme applies to the contemporary Germany of the period.

I don’t want this essay to be too disjointed but as the past is ever present in the present, for a proper understanding one has to meld the present with the past.  Feuchtwanger is well versed in Jewish history and lore.  He knows and understands the Jewish program.  In Jewish thinking the Jews are always distinct from and superior to the host people.  Thus, the Jew Suss Oppenheimer although essentially an employee of the Duke of Wurttemberg, Karl Alexander, he considers himself equal to and indeed preeminent over his employer.

At the end of the story when Suss has put the State into turmoil and the Duke lay dying Suss whispers into his ear, we could have been friends but you felt yourself preeminent when I was superior to you in every way.  Together what we may have accomplished with myself representing the aristocracy of money and you as the aristocrat of the soil.

Here Feuchtwanger gives away the Jewish conspiracy.  By commandeering the banking system they became not only equal to but superior to the landed nobility.  Who has money controls destiny.

Suss was the organizer of modern Jewry, he paved the way for the Rothschilds, ne Bauer, to be the near absolute lords of money beginning only a few year after Suss’ hanging.  Of course the Rothschild rise was made possible by the theft of the fortune of the Landgrave of Hesse Cassel during Napoleonic times.

As is common knowledge Nathan Rothschild was sent to England to exploit the textile manufacturing industry.  According to the current historian Niall Ferguson in his history of the Rothschilds using Rothschild archives, Nathan had a struggle to stay solvent resorting to a variety of devious practices including smuggling.  Then the Landgrave entrusted either his fortune or a large part of it to Mayer Rothschild the patriarch of the family who sent substantial sums to Nathan making him a banker and richest stock broker in the City.  From there within a very few years the Rothschilds became the lords of money gaining patents of nobility wherever they lived thus realizing Suss’ dream.  The Jews had become equal or superior to the European nobility.

In the interim between Suss’ and Feuchtwanger’s time the Jews had taken control of European and American currency through the Central banks, the Federal Reserve System in the United States.  Thus, as I interpret it in the sly conclusion of the Jew Suss Feuchtwanger  is celebrating what in 1926 looked like the triumph of the Jews over Germany and Euroamerica.  Essentially the Stateless Jews were the State from Russia across Europe to the United States.   Money had displaced both European nobility and statehood while Europe was in turmoil soon to be virtually destroyed by warfare.

Once again at the risk of confusing the issue it is necessary to go back in time again.  This time to 1666 in Europe.  As always the Jews were welcome nowhere by host countries.  In eleventh century Mesopotamia the Jews had been expelled.  The bulk of them migrated to Spain.  Then in the thirteenth century they were expelled from England, in the fourteenth century from France and in the fifteenth from Spain.  The Spanish migration had been to Africa, the Turkish Empire in the Middle East and increasingly into the Eastern European area that was to be called the Pale of Settlement.  They had been banned from the Muscovite land much earlier.  The German States now expelling them, letting them back in, banning again, etc.

In the seventeenth century in the extended Polish empire in the Ukraine where they made themselves pests the Ukrainians rebelled against the Poles and their Jewish allies causing mass destructions.  The Jews fled in numbers into Germany and Holland carrying their medieval vision of religion with them.  This was just prior to the career of Suss and the establishment of Court Jews.  Thus the German lands were in turmoil as the Jews struggled to establish themselves.

Becoming increasingly exasperated while blaming their woes on anti-Semitism rather than their own actions a Messiah arose in the seventeenth century Turkic states by the name of Sabbatai Zevi.  As the Jewish messiah is preeminently a military redeemer a great buzz of excitement was aroused amongst worldwide Jewry.  (The US does not yet figure in world politics).  Especially in Europe where the Jews were struggling to find a place.

History knows the Jews as violent brutal revolutionists, a people that nurses grievances and never forgets them.   Thus remembering the Amalekites, in the second century the Jews of Alexandria and Rhodes on a signal turned on their unsuspecting neighbors murdering about 250 K in each location committing horrid atrocities.  This set off a bloody reprisal in which Rome terminated the Jewish State.

Now in the seventeenth century just as European events were setting the Jews in turmoil Zevi’s messiahship was rising to a climax in 1666, that year was determined as the year of the redemption.  Thus as in Rhodes and Alexandria the Jews prepared to turn on their European neighbors murdering them wholesale, a genocide in hopes.  This is history and one suspects the history has survived into our times as well as Germany and Europe of the twenties and thirties.

The signal was to have been Zevi declaring the millennium in an audience with the Sultan in Turkey.  Instead of declaring himself the Messiah Zevi converted to Moslemism.  The revolution fizzled much to the dismay of the Jews.  Remember this occurred from say, 1660 to 1680.  Suss enjoyed his heyday in the four years from 1730-34 in the eighteenth century.  That is a mere fifty years from Zevi’s apostasy.  There must have living people who remembered those tumultuous times as Suss grew up.  Although Feuchtwanger doesn’t mention it, perhaps even his characters Isaac Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel.

Nor were those intervening five decades years of repose for the Jews.  The disappointment caused a movement toward a whole reorganization of Judaism.  On the Western edge of the Pale the Jewish visionary the BaalShemTov created the Hasidic sect that challenged Rabbinic Judaism while a disciple of Zevi, Jacob Frank, created the freak sect of Frankists or Sabbatians whose belief system taught that the Millennium would never come until the Jews had indulged all their evil impulses thus clearing their psyches of nothing but good impulses thus preparing them to receive their redemption.

At the same time the Elders put their heads together to come up with a plan in which the people themselves would be their own messiah renouncing individual messiahs.  So that the above was the Jewish background in which Suss arose and flourished.  Feuchtwanger was aware of it as there are descriptive references to it.

So, now, Feuchtwanger wrote his story in 1921-2 and published it in 1925.  Things in the Jewish world had progressed.  As Feuchtwanger describes it in his novel Suss, Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel have been working to get together the Jewish network from the four corners of Europe.  Suss represented the future of an open display of Jewish financial power while Landauer represent the traditional sub rosa power of money.  Rabbi Gabriel was a strange one.  He was a Jew who migrated to Holland where his prime identity lay but for his networking purposes he went in disguise as Ahasuerus, the Wandering Jew.  He actively claimed to be several hundred years old and the actual Jew who insulted Jesus.  The disguise amused the gentiles gaining their tolerance as he moved from place to place organizing. 

At Suss’ death in 1734 it was only about fifty years to the proclamation of Jewish emancipation by the French Revolution.  It was in 1806 that Napoleon overran Hesse-Cassell that the Landgrave made the Bauer/Rothschilds by entrusting his wealth to them.  From then to the 1897 Jewish Zionist convention in Vienna was only another ninety years.  It was then but sixteen years to 1913.

According to the American Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver the Elders had determined that the years 1913-28 were to be the years of the redemption as the Jewish Revolution at which time the Jews would kill their European neighbors and unlike 115 and 1666 succeed.  Six years after the Vienna Zionist convention the first Russian Revolution was attempted but failed.  Out of the convention and the first Revolution came the document known as The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion that outlined the Revolution that would succeed in Russia in 1917.

As a result of the European War of 1914-18  Europe was totally devastated and in turmoil.  The war that had engulfed Europe from Russian to England had destroyed the flower of European manhood.  The aftermath in Central and Eastern Europe consumed even more.  Once in power in Russia as Dostoyevsky predicted the Jews began killing the Russians.  Of course historians speak of Russian activities against the Jews while ignoring Jewish crimes.

When the news of Jewish atrocities reached Western Europe they became alarmed.  The Manchester Morning Post published a book, The World’s Problem that sounded the alarm.  The Jews were prepared.  It took relatively small effort to discredit the Protocols while having their opponents discredited as anti-Semites.

However, even though the German Communist Revolution failed Jews had thoroughly infiltrated the government while controlling German and international banking and the press while obtaining a significant number of university posts.  The Weimar Republic is remembered by Jews as almost realizing the hopes of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer and it is that that Lion Feuchtwanger is celebrating in his novel.

Feuchtwanger, in the Jewish manner, took himself very very seriously.  He believed he was a great, perhaps the greatest novelist, while being at the same time a seer or prophet.  In an interview of 1930 he asserted positively that things were under control and there would be no revolution in Germany.  Of course, in 1933 he learned differently.   Just as the Wurttembergers had turned on Suss so in 1933 the Germans turned on the Jewish people.  In a way then, Feuchtwanger was a prophet.

In the novel as well as in history Suss assumed the role of the dark, even black, eminence of the Duke Karl Alexander.  All his counsels were evil while given on the basis of three for him and one for the Duke.  Like Colonel Parker and Elvis the great lion’s share of the money earned by Elvis went into the Colonel’s pocket and the remainder into Elvis’.  So with Suss.  When Wurttembergers remonstrated with him Suss haughtily informed them they couldn’t hang him higher than the gallows.  As it turned out they could.  They had a special seldom used gallows thirty feet higher than the usual gallows.  Plus Suss was shut into an iron cage in which his body was exposed to the elements for years.  He had ably earned that level of hatred by his actions.

So Feuchtwanger pointed the way to the anger of Germany in which having no other recourse the Germans set about systematically exterminating them.  A gallows high indeed.  But, remember, the years 1913-28 were the years of redemption.  Just as the Jews in the immediate years following 1918 slaughtered millions in Russia and Hungary and would have in Germany had the revolution succeeded so the Germans were in peril as a people and it had nothing to do with any holocaust.  In 1940 a Jew from Newark, New Jersey, Theodore Kaufmann published a book called Germany Must Die.  In it he proposed to castrate all German males, thus Germans would disappear within a generation.  Genocide in another word.   This notion of castration reappeared in FDR’s talk as it became evident that the Germans would be defeated.  The Jews then were no less guilty in intent than the Germans.

Having no territories or armies the Jewish offensive had to be asymmetrical, that is psychological warfare.  They had the gifted Sigmund Freud to guide them.  Sigmund Freud’s role in guiding the destiny of the Jewish Revolution is suppressed but as my studies advance he assumes a much more central role.

As part of the asymmetrical warfare propaganda, of course, took first place.  Psycho-analysis itself was controlled by the Jews, almost a closed club although it had to represent itself as a universal science.  A science is universal so that Judaism already active in all countries from the Soviet Union to the Americas enjoying the advantage of the Trojan Horse of Communism also thrust themselves into science as a Trojan Horse perverting scientific disciplines into subjective Jewish propaganda.

Already in control of the print media in the Pan-Judaic superstate of Europe and America either by direct ownership or psychological control through the charge of anti-Semitism it only remained to gain control of emerging technologies such as movies and radio.  This was easily accomplished, the theater and movies certainly began as Jewish monopolies which, at least in the US, all radio networks were in their control from the beginning.

Thus by the twenties the Jews were in a position to direct the social and intellectual mores of society.  One no longer hears mores discussed as they once were even though mores control society even more than laws.  For instance there was no law against criticizing Jews, one can’t be punished for criticizing Jews in Court while Jews have established as a more that criticism of Jews is an unforgivable social faux pas so that any individual will be ostracized by his own people, blacklisted, deprived of employment having his entire future ruined.  A penalty no Court could inflict.  People have lost careers amounting to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars by the single accusation, that is accusation, no proof or trial required, and with no recourse to law.   Simple mechanics, street sweepers, had been rendered unemployable for life.

Using this immunity from criticism the Jews began an attack on the mores of the people of Pan-Judea.  They began defaming the heroes of the various cultures defaming them into ridiculous caricatures.  In the US the character of Thomas Jefferson, for instance, has been demolished, Washington also.  Having gotten the wedge in the whole of the American past has been reduced to one huge crime for which living White people are held wholly responsible and must be punished.

At the same time the media elevated insignificant Jews to positions of not only importance but extreme virtue.  It matters not that they were important out of all proportion in the slave trade or as slave owners.  They were Jews and all their crimes could be justified.

Thus when Feuchtwanger’s Jud Suss appeared in 1925 alert Germans immediately recognized its import, its attack on Germans and German mores.

While I am not familiar with the whole body of European Jewish writing it was also at this time that Emil Ludwig began writing derogatory biographies of Bismarck and Napoleon that drew the ire of European readers.  Feuchtwanger himself continued his sarcastic derogatory style in his next novel of 1930, Success, that ridiculed and mocked the society of his native Munich in much the same manner as Jud Suss.  He displayed  a contempt for European mores much as his contemporary Sigmund Freud was doing in his psychological treatises.  In films, the two Dr. Mabuse movies of Fritz Lang are worth noting.  I am unfamiliar with US and French efforts but in the US Gustavus Myers was turning out a long series of books denigrating American mores and customs from finance to the Supreme Court finally ending his career in 1942 with his History Of Bigotry In The United States.

So from the Soviet Union West to the Americas the asymmetrical war on the West was being very successfully waged.  The back of Western confidence and self-respect was broken.  In the great German book burning in which Jewish texts were destroyed Feuchtwanger’s earned prominence.

The war accelerated when the Nazis Party gained power in 1933.  Perhaps in support of that event Feuchtwanger began the movie script for Jud Suss that was released in that year in England under the title Jew Suss and in the US under the title Power.  Closely adhering to the book the movie was a vicious propaganda piece.

A number of propaganda movies celebrating Judaism in the lead up to the attempted Jewish seizure of power were such films as Erlich’s Magic Bullet, The Rothschilds, The Story Of Emile Zola and several B level anti-Nazi movies of the late thirties and early forties.  The chief irritant to the Nazis after Jud Suss was the US production of The Rothschilds.  While nearly everything noted here is currently available American The Rothschilds is not.  The movie apparently covered the Napoleonic period involving the Rothschild shipment of gold through France to aid Wellington in the Peninsular War.

When the Germans got around to answering these two propaganda films in the early forties with their own propaganda versions they were demeaned as, naturally, anti-Semitic.  The directors of the German Rothschild film covering the same events of the Jewish version was vilified after the war and the vilification continues to today.   The vilification of Veit Harlan, the director of this brilliant film, is carried to extremes although perhaps a tribute to his skill.

The Napoleonic episode is apparently still sensitive to the Rothschild family since the massive biography by Niall Ferguson only reaches to 1905 then pussy foots around the incident.  After pages of verbiage Ferguson refuses to come to any definite conclusion and he was given access to the family records and papers.

As these two films are key to Jewish the war I will attempt to deal with them in extenso.

The Jewish versions appeared first.  The Jew Suss was released simultaneously in England under that title and in the US titled Power.  The Rothschilds was released in the US under that name in 1934; whether it was distributed in England I don’t know but suspect so.  It must be remembered that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933 so that these two films have to be seen as acts of war, part of an extensive ongoing campaign.  For instance in 1937 the Dreyfus Affair in France of the 1890s was revived in the US film The Life Of Emile Zola.  Zola was a French novelist who championed the cause of Dreyfus.  Alfred Dreyfus was a Jew serving as a French military officer.  He was tried and found guilty of spying.  He was certainly guilty although probably not for spying for the Germans.  Like Johnathan Pollard in the US he was turning documents over to his fellow Jews.  He spent a number of years on Devil’s Island until with the help of Zola his conviction was overturned.  The affair was a serious issue that convulsed France and apparently still does as Roman Polanski is scheduled to direct another film sometime soon.  Apparently along with slavery we should all feel guilty of the indignity that Dreyfus suffered even though he was guilty.

For the Germans the two most galling films were Jud Suss and the Rothschilds.  They answered the former in 1940 and the latter in 1943.  As films both are superior to the Jewish versions although my opinion will be objected to as anti-Semitic, but facts are facts.  The English-American Jew Suss was written by Feuchtwanger thus closely following the outline of his book.  The German film presents the story from the perspective of the Germans who were afflicted with Suss’ policies.

Both films follow the general outlines of Suss’ actions and policies.  There is no real conflict between the two versions.  In both, as well as in fact, the Duke Karl Alexander gave Suss what seems to be in our terms a Power of Attorney giving him the full authority of the Duke to do as he pleased.  His will was the Duke’s will.  Seems rather extraordinary that a ruler would give such a thing but there you have it.  It is an inexplicable action of the Duke.  One can even imagine it as his essential abdication.  Certainly the Power Of Attorney gave him the right to depose the Duke.

In any case the Money  Power as represented by Suss was placed in a superior position over the temporal power of the Duke.

After the Duke’s death this presented a legal problem for the Wurttembergers because in fact Suss was acting in the Duke’s name.  Thus Suss was absolved of all responsibility.  Unlike Feuchtwanger’s two versions, book and movie, in the German version the Wurttembergers were driven into open rebellion.  In the German version there is no indication that the Duke was murdered by Suss but the Duke had some strange degeneration losing his will.  He surrendered his own will to Suss while the Duke’s wife and his advisors all seem to have been accomplices of Suss.  Perhaps he was a master hypnotist or else how explain it.  At the end of the German version the Duke is a drunk who when confronted by the rebels flies into a rage and has a stroke or heart attack.  Goes apoplectic as they used to say.

With his death Suss’ Power of Attorney loses its validity.  He is arrested and tried.  As stated, legally he was acting as the will of the Duke having no personal responsibility.  It is interesting to note though that German soldiers under orders, therefore having no will of their own, were held responsible by the Jews for following orders in the camps.  The law is the law until it isn’t.

The German problem then is that they are bound by the rule of law and cannot violate it so as they ponder it appears that Suss must go free.

However there is a law on the books making it illegal for a Jews to have intercourse with a German girl.  While in the book and Feuchtwanger’s movie Suss had mingled with many German women including the Duke’s wife in the German version he violates the daughter of the Privy Counselor the girl then drowning herself.  The law is the law and the penalty is death.  The Privy Counselor gets his due back (law is not vengeance) by exacting the prescribed death penalty.

In Feuchtwanger’s versions Suss’ daughter committed suicide to escape the attentions of the Duke.  Thus the Germans neatly reverse the situation.

Now, the German version released in 1940 was roundly condemned by the Jews as ragingly anti-Semitic; this is strange as neither the Jewish or German versions contest the facts of Suss’ activities.  The Jews happily admit Suss’ crimes.

Both movies were released before there was a hint of a holocaust so one is at a loss to explain the Jewish sensitivity, especially so as in the US in 1940 the book The Germans Must Die by Theodore Kaufmann called for the genocide of Germans.  The Germans were thoroughly outraged by the book and its positive reception in the US causing Goebbels to exclaim that the Germans would see who died first.  Perhaps the seeds of the holocaust were planted in German minds at that time.

Jud Suss then, was the reply to the English/American production of Jew Suss.  That left the equally galling movie from the German viewpoint of The Rothschilds to answer; this was done in 1943 when the Germans replied in kind dealing with the transport of gold to Wellington in Spain during the Peninsular War against Napoleon.  The event has been kept shrouded in mystery so the Jewish guilt must be enormous.

As noted the American film to which the Germans were responding is being kept off the market as of 10/12/16 so the only conclusion is that even by Jewish standards the incident is indefensible.  We will have to infer from the German film.

As there may be readers who are not familiar with the historical account it may be appropriate to give that briefly.

When Suss had organized the Jews into a functioning unit, the ‘united’ Jews continued to develop along with the emerging new money based economy of Europe.  Excluded from the old land based wealth the Jews were uniquely positioned to seize the money based economy.

As is shown in the German Rothschild film the peasantry and even the nobility had little familiarity with numbers and were easily bamboozled by fast talking Jews who had been usurers for centuries.  This is demonstrated in both the Jewish and German versions.

The French Revolution occurred forty-nine years after Suss’ death freeing the Jews from medieval restrictions; this was called the emancipation.  The Europeans expected the Jews to abandon their parochial ways and become one people with the Europeans.

As Feuchtwanger said the Jews expected to become a sovereign entity as the Lords of Cash.

There were hurdles before them but they were swept aside when Napoleon in 1806 annexed the German principality of Hesse-Cassell.  The Landgrave of Hesse-Cassell had amassed the largest fortune in Europe by renting out his male subjects as soldiers to other States.  In the book Suss’ advises Duke Karl to hire soldiers to suppress the Duke’s subjects.  These most likely would have come from Hesse-Cassell.

The Landgrave then used the receipts to loan money to the other States and people amassing mortgages all over Europe.  Napoleon wanted the money; to avoid his getting it the Landgrave enlisted the aid of his Court Jew, Mayer Rothschild ne Bauer who secreted the fortune.  Some believe the Landgrave entrusted the whole of his fortune to Rothschild.  Niall Ferguson in his history is ambiguous waltzing around the issue.

In the German movie the Landgrave entrusts Rothschild with 650K in negotiable bills.  Changing the issues from the Landgrave to the English Jew Montifiore Mayer sent them to his son Nathan who was stationed in England.

A few years earlier Mayer had sent his ‘five arrows’ of legend to various capitals: Nathan to England, James to Paris and the three others to Berlin, Vienna and Naples.

Nathan began in the textile business in Manchester which apparently was too hard for him so he resorted to the criminal means of smuggling and other subterfuges.  The smuggling experience would stand him in good stead.  Nathan had also positioned himself in the City.  The London district known as the City is equivalent to Wall Street in the US.

When Napoleon invaded Spain the English countered by sending Wellington and an army to Spain to counter the invasion.  Operating from England the provisioning of the army was difficult.  To fund Wellington it was necessary to send gold.  The sea route was considered too precarious so an overland route was deemed necessary.  Overland meant passing through Napoleon’s citadel of France.

England was short of gold but a shipment arrived from India that was sold at auction.  The English financiers were a sort of cartel so they expected to obtain the gold.  However with the 650K in paper securities from his father (according to the German film) Nathan was in a position to outbid the cartel which he did.

He then had the only gold available to send to Wellington.  He agreed to do this for a handsome fee.  Napoleon who was retreating from Russia was defeated and sent to Elbe.  From there he would soon return to France assemble an army and meet Wellington at Waterloo.

This was a second opportunity for the Rothschilds that far surpassed the gold purchase and its transport to Spain.  This stunt would be worth in excess of ten million pounds making the Rothschilds the wealthiest family in Europe while setting the stage for the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

The price of government securities in England would depend on the results of Waterloo.  A loss, stocks down, a win stocks up.  A window of opportunity would exist between the time of the outcome and the time the news reached England.  No phones, no telegraph, no internet.  Nathan Rothschild saw his chance to cheat the people of England and he took it.  He had his agents at Waterloo to record the outcome, some say he used passenger pigeons, some say not. In any event his agents got the news of Napoleon’s defeat to him first.   Nathan created a panic by circulating the story that Wellington had been defeated.  Then when prices were at their lowest, apparently fire sale prices, he bought as much as he could.  When the news of victory arrived it was too late for the cartel.   Nathan had become the richest man in England.

Perhaps that is why as of 11/5/16 the US version of the Rothschilds is unavailable.  The facts coincide with the German version too closely.  In any event if the US version is released you may be sure it will be heavily edited, quite unlike the original.

Of course the cry is that the German versions of both movies are anti-Semitic rather than historical.  At least in the case of the Rothschilds the facts are incontrovertible.  The smuggling of the gold through France was actually known by the French authorities at the time.  The police under the direction of Fouche were not fools.  Fouche himself is credited as being brilliant.  Nor are German historians fools.  They are more than competent.  Before the two world wars German universities were considered tops in the world.  German scholars stood out as the most brilliant stars in the firmament.  German music and literature was unsurpassed.

Beginning with the Weimar Republic and Jewish dominance standards slipped while German hatred in the West led by the Jews libeled everything Germans did.  The point being there is no reason to doubt the scholarship on which the German Rothschild film is based.  The Germans are speaking from intimate knowledge of the Jews as indeed the controversy from Suss to 1950 indicates.  You need only to read Jewish-German literature to see the contempt with which Jews treat the Germans.  But if you control the propaganda as the Jews do, black may be made white and vice versa.

Hitler in his Mein Kampf clearly delineates the problem.  As he wrote, that if he and the Volkists failed their heads would roll in the sand.  This prediction was proven in the years following the defeat.  The war did not end with the allied victory but continued to rage one sidedly over the prostrate Germany for at least five years.

During 1943 the year the German Rothschild was released the extermination of the Jews was reaching maximum efficiency.  Now, we must take the Jewish threat to exterminate the Germans through castration seriously.  Had FDR not died in ’45 before hostilities ceased it is quite possible he might have ordered such an action.  He was surrounded by Jewish advisors who certainly would have encouraged him most notably his Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr., who had already usurped significant Executive powers not unlike Suss himself from the Duke.

To put the matter into perspective then, the German extermination of the Jews may be seen as a preemptive strike.  The Jews have always favored preemptive strikes.  So while in 1943 the Germans had the upper hand a short time later the Jews would gain the upper hand over a completely bombed over destroyed Germany flattened by tens of thousands of bomb raids.

Fortunately there were saner heads in Washington who were aghast at the lunacy of what was now the Morgenthau plan, Kaufmann having been forgotten.  Thus, when Truman replaced FDR Morgenthau found he could no longer give orders to him as he could FDR.  When Morgenthau haughtily told Truman the he would do what Morgenthau said or Morgenthau would quit Truman merely held his hand out to accept the resignation.  At that point a great deal of the Jewish influence prominent under FDR evaporated.

But the Jewish influence had been cultivated since 1933 and was so embedded that its actions persisted.  As is not too well known Bernard Baruch, an arch-Jewish villain in this period, had cultivated his acquaintance with Eisenhower from the days of the Bonus March in 1934.  Eisenhower revered Baruch saying he had sat at his feet for twenty-six years while considering him the wisest man he knew.  The influence was so incredibly effective that Eisenhower initially ordered the extermination of the surrendered German troops.  During the winter of 1946 one of the coldest on record he left entire German armies in the open with no cover and the scantiest of rations.  He ordered that any German civilian who tried to pass food through the fence be shot dead.

The allies also perpetrated enormous crimes against the German people.  The French and Americans turned hordes of African troops and American Negroes loose to rape German women at will, not unlike Mama Merkel and the Moslems today.  The French took tens of thousands of German troops as slave labor and worked them to death.

Perhaps you say the Germans did the same but even if they did were we, the children of light, that kind of people?  Well, yes we were although it was never reported in the papers.  I grew up believing Americans were sainted people who went into battle with a holy fervor bearing the banner of a righteous Lord before us.  I grew up believing no American soldier would commit an act of injustice or cruelty.  I was lied to.

The truth has taken decades to reach me.  I should have known better because as great or greater crimes have been committed on American soil by Americans.  I was raised to believe that Sherman’s March from Atlanta to the Sea was a great military feat.  The actions of General Sheridan in the Shenandoah Valley or the evacuation of half a dozen counties around Kansas City were never mentioned but all three were horrendous crimes.  General Grant’s demand for an unconditional surrender was just that, a turning over of American minds and bodies to do with as the North liked; hence the horrors of Reconstruction.  The Southern Whites were essentially reduced to slavery.  We are that kind of people.

Thus when Roosevelt demanded unconditional surrender from the Germans it was his intent to murder the entire nation if he chose;  we are that kind of people.

Despite Obama’s assurances to the contrary he himself has declared opposition to his rule to come from Domestic Terrorists, his acolyte, Hillary Clinton has disparaged dissidents as a Basket of Deplorables, really having no right to exist.  Sorry, Barry, we are that kind of people.  Opposition to them is irredeemably bad.  The Jew, Noel Ignatiev, and various Negro leaders have demanded the extermination of the White race; therefore setting the staging in place for the extermination of half of the White population.  We are that kind of people.  We’ve done it before.

The slaughter of Germans by the allies and Soviets in the East, US, Brits and French in the West was incredible, far exceeding any German war crimes.  The post-war assault was led by the Jews.  While a small percentage of the allied peoples, the so-called war crimes trials were staffed disproportionately with Jews.  Even though the Jews first declared war against the Germans, and even though the Jews first called for the extermination of the Germans backed by the full power of the Soviet Union and the US, France and England, as in WWI the Germans were declared the aggressor nation.

Even though the Jews were murdering their so-called British allies throughout the Middle East at the exact same time the war crimes trials were held, even though the Jews in the US sent out teams of man-hunters to track down innocent men and women they deemed anti-Semites in an extra-legal manner the Jews called themselves the victims.

Even though the Jews were punishing Germans they set their man-hunters to punish the US for the ‘crime against humanity’ of not demanding a cessation of hostilities until the entire Jewish population of Europe had been removed from the hostilities to the safety of the US.  Their determination to exterminate Whites today is based on this perceived injustice.

As unremitting as ever the Jews deeply resented the German version of the Jud Suss movie.  The key Germans were tried and found guilty, some committed suicide, some were hanged outright, somewhat reminiscently of Suss, while some were subjected to cruel and unusual punishments.  The children of the German leaders were treated like animals deprived of all humanity, they were not allowed education or the right to live their lives.

Over the decades Jewish man-hunters tracked down totally insignificant German soldiers to be imprisoned or killed by judicial murders.  The man-hunters violated all international law and the rights of countries such as Argentina professing themselves to be a holy people above human laws.

Veit Harlan, the director of the superb film Jud Suss was deprived of work and hounded from pillar to post.  He had committed no crime for which he could be tried or convicted.  The movie Jud Suss was a historical film based on real incidents, in its general outline it differed in no substantial way from the Jews’ own version.  History is history and cannot be denied.  The Jewish version lauded Suss as a great Jewish hero; the German version condemned him as a great criminal.  There was no anti-Semitism so -called.

The Jews merely consider it a crime to criticize them in any way.  It is time for the dead past to bury its dead.  It is time for the Jews to leave their so-called grievances behind.  There are no innocents.  The Jews are their own problem.  They merit no special handling.