Making Facts Fit The Narrative

Making Facts Fit The Narrative

A Review of Fareed Zakaria In Foreign Affairs

by

R.E. Prindle

Zakaria, Fareed: The New China Scare, Foreign Affairs, Jan-Feb 2020

Mr. Zakaria subtitles his screed:  Why America Shouldn’t Panic About Its Latest Challenger, that is, China.  My objection to Foreign Affairs, Mr. Zakaria and the whole Leftist-Liberal Establishment is that while professing to be far in advance than the Conservatives they cling to the whole post-WWII fantasy of American hegemony or supremacy.  That time is gone.  We are now living in a new Global era which is inter-locked economically while national sovereignty is taking a much diminished role.

Because of the shifting of whole national populations into the United States it is no longer possible, if it ever was, to speak of a unit called America.  America was a dream of the past.  Because of the extreme diversity of the US there is not one but several ethnic Americas.  The Chinese themselves already have a significant presence in the US and are inundating our neighbor to the North, Canada.  These domestic Chinese identify more with China than the US so it is not appropriate to speak of a China while disregarding its ex-pats in the rest of the world.  It is more or a Chinese diaspora and has to be dealt with as such.

Mr. Zakaria is himself a Moslem and in speaking of his ‘chosen’ country he speaks of it as an other and not as his own.  Thus in his subtitle he speaks that ‘America shouldn’t Panic.’  We, who have been born here, perhaps several generations ago, don’t recognize the China problem as panic, we recognize China as a competitor on the world stage that is seeking world dominance or, put another way, it wants to be the Top Country.  China being 90 some percent of the same ethnic group, Han Chinese doesn’t have the identity problem that the US does.  China does not cater to its minority peoples they dominate and subordinate them as with the Uigurs on its Eastern frontier.  Nor are they polite; they round the Uigurs up, put them in concentration camps and ‘indoctrinate’ them out of their ways, which are Moslem, into Chinese ways.  If Europe or the US would attempt that the world, including the Chinese, would put up a howl.  Yet if the West wants to maintain its culture it must ‘indoctrinate’ its minorities as the Chinese do.  Even the Hindus of India have belatedly become aware that their culture is under threat from the Moslems and repressive measures are being taken.

Let us be clear there is no China Scare in the US contrary to Mr. Zakarias assertion.  We are dealing with the new Global situation on a calm rational basis.

By a New China Scare Mr. Zakaria does not mean to refer to a second China scare, he is referencing the defensive measures taken against the Communist threat after WWI and WWII.  By ‘scare’ he means an irrational response to an imaginary threat.  Thus he tries to force the facts to fit his narrative. 

In point of fact there was a Communist threat that had to be quelled.  After WWI the alert and astute Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer rose to the occasion rounding the Communists up and actually deporting a few hundred to the Socialist Homeland, the Soviet Union.  His efforts were compromised by the Domestic Reds in prominent positions.

After WWII HUAC rose to the occasion abetted by 1950 with the activities of the courageous Senator Joseph McCarthy who also were defeated by internal Communist forces, but the Communist momentum was derailed after both wars and forced to reorganize.

Now, Zakaria follows the official CIA line in which ignorant American fears dominate their actions.  Thus they say that in both the aftermath of WWI and WWII there were no Communist threats and the effective responses to defuse those threats were merely panic attacks.  While our great generals had won the wars and our brave American soldiers had outfought their terrible enemies immediately on arriving home they had panic attacks rather than recognizing enemy tactics.  In WWI Mitchell Palmer who acted so magnificently has been defamed as a paranoid dodo.

After WWII Pres. Truman’s actions are characterized this way by Zakaria following the CFR playbook:

In February 1947, US President Harry Truman huddled with his most senior policy advisors, George Marshall, and Dean Acheson and a handful of Congressional leaders.  The topic was the administration’s plan to aid the Greek government in the fight (scary response in Mr. Zakaria’s thought processes) against a Communist insurgency.  Marshall and Acheson presented their case for the plan.  Arthur Vandenberg, chair of the Senate Committee On Foreign Relations, listened closely and then offered his support with a caveat.  “The only way you are going to get what you want,” he reportedly told the president, “is to make a speech and scare the hell out of the country.”

Now, one might say that Pres. Truman, acting in his capacity and duty as the President, presented his speech to alert the country to the threat of World Communist domination which was real and imminent at the time having been encouraged by the Communist sympathizer former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt who Vice President Truman succeeded after having been purposely kept ignorant of the world situation even though Roosevelt was obviously a sick and dying man.

Zakaria says that Pres. Truman was not rational but an irrational scare tactician manipulating the country to get what he wanted.  Zakaria could have co-written Howard Zinn’s trashy history.  This is the way that the Left discredits by insinuation and defamatory characterization ignoring the facts.

Mr. Zakaria continues:

Over the next few months, Truman did just that.  He turned the civil war in Greece into a test of the United States ability to confront international communism.

You see how Zakaria turns the situation from an internationally communist backed insurgency into a civil war, and instead of an international defense against the spread of communism into an ego test of the United States ability to confront international communism.  Obviously Truman and the US was at fault and not Joseph Stalin and international communism.  Thus we go from a communist insurgency to a civil war, to a ‘test’ against international communism.  This says something as to why the CFR would allow such trash in their magazine.

Quote:  (note the language)

Reflecting on Truman’s expansive rhetoric about aiding democracies anywhere, anytime, Acheson confessed in his memoirs that the administration had made an argument “clearer than truth.”  Something similar is happening today in the American debate about China.

Unquote.

Not the negative characterization of the phrase ‘Truman’s expansive rhetoric about aiding democracies anytime, anywhere’ and Acheson ‘confessed.’  Did he really confess or merely state what might have been an obvious truth to him.  And his ‘clearer than truth’ may be meant positively rather than negatively.  It can possibly be read both ways but Zakaria make Acheson ‘confess’ which is negative.  This is the Leftist way.

Perhaps English is Mr. Zakaria’s second language while Arabic is his first. Oh, I know, I know, even though Mr. Zakaria is a Moslem he is as ‘American’ as apple pie.  He may even have been born here, right?

Mr. Zakaria says that similar to the ‘Red Scares’ is happening today  in the American debate about China.  Not true, there is nothing similar at all.  This is a different time, different circumstances and a different grope for power.  What Americans should panic about is Mr. Zakaria’s being given space to spin his anti-American vitriol.  Would it be out of line to ask from which university Mr. Zakaria received his degree in history?

Pt. VIII: Time Traveling With R.E. Prindle

Pt. VIII:  Time Traveling With R.E. Prindle

by

R.E. Prindle

A Dialogue Between George Reynolds and John Dicks with asides from R.E. Prindle.

 

Let us imagine George Reynolds and John Dicks sitting over lunch and a nice glass of Lafite, as George spelled it, reminiscing in early 1860 about the good old days.  At this point in time George had ended, or was about to, his novelistic career.  He would now devote himself to journalistic matters with his very successful newspaper and magazine.  John Dicks who began his association with George in late 1847 had run a tight printing shop always keeping up with developments in printing.  An employee of George at this time he will soon be made a full partner and go on to an illustrious later career of publishing cheap literary editions for the masses.

Merely getting by back in ’47 they are now well-to-do men with money in the bank and more rolling in with every publication.  They have every reason to think well of themselves.

John asks George how he came up with the idea or the first two Mysteries of London series about the Markham Brothers and the astonishing Resurrection Man.

 

George:  That’s kind of an interesting story John.  As you know my last couple of books, damn good books too, had flopped.  My whole early career was kind of a waste.  My apprenticeship one might call it.   Personally I thought the Steam Packet and Master Timothy’s Bookcase were great, but, the fickle public, you know…

There I was approaching thirty supporting my family with odd jobs,  looking desperately into the future with great fear, a failure without an idea, when George Stiff approached me and said he had a novel idea, serial, that he was calling the Mysteries of London, same general notion as Eugene Sue’s Mysteries of Paris.  There was also another Mysteres de Londres by this other French fellow by the name of Paul Feval who had actually published his Mysteres de Londres that was alright.  I had this notion of two brothers who chose different paths in life, Richard Markham, virtue, and his brother Eugene, vice.

John:  Did that have anything to do with Ainsworth’s two brothers in Rookwood?

George:  I remembered that and then there’s Cain and Able of course and Romulus and Remus of Rome but, more importantly I could never get De Sade’s two novels Justine and Juliette out of my mind with De Sade’s notions about the rewards of virtue and vice.  So, I changed the sexes to men and reversed the roles and made virtuous Richard more successful than vicious Eugene.  I think I’m right too.

John:  Did Eugene have any reference to Sue, his first name?

George:  Probably.  A little joke.  I leaned pretty heavily on Sue during my career.  A lot more from his Wandering Jew than The Mysteres de Paris, and then his later work.  Sue just died you know, young man.  Worked himself to death.  Terrific prolific writer.  I borrowed a lot but don’t lets talk about that.

John:  I hadn’t heard about Sue’s death.  Interesting fellow.  You didn’t by any chance use him as a model for the Marquis of Holmesford in the second series of Mysteries of London by any chance did you George?             

George:  You got that, did you John?

John:  I know your devious mind, George.  I remembered how fascinated you were that Sue kept a harem of women of many different nationalities and races in his castle.  Then when Holmesford did the same thing I did associate the two.  Of course you made Holmesford an old man for your literary purposes but the similarities were there.

George:  The truth is stranger than fiction, John  but fiction makes it more interesting.  Do you know that many of those women were actually Sue’s slave girls?  He owned them.

John:  No, I didn’t know that.  Most of them were white women, how could he own those?  Where did he buy them?

George:  Slavery hasn’t disappeared John, it’s true that we English outlawed the African slave trade back in ’02 or whenever but slavery is still going strong in America and the Brazils and the middle East.  That fellow Livingston reports that the barbaric Arab slave trade from East Africa to the Middle East is tremendous.

The Ottomans control the Balkans and parts of the Caucasus so that slave marts selling whites is still Strong.  Samuel Baker, the fellow that is organizing his African expedition actually bought his wife in Hungary at a slave mart in Budapest.  Wonderful story.  So, there were many sources for Sue to buy his women.  Of course, I put in a sly joke with Holmesford  in which, rather than die in bed, he struggles to his feet to stagger to the arms of his favorite and dies on her capacious bosom.

Everyone takes a negative view of it when it’s supposed to be a tender moment if humorous.  Good way to die don’t you think John?  Hated to see Sue die, there goes my inspiration.  Dumas’ still alive but my intuition tells me he’s finished.  Boy, what productively, exhausted his brain.  I’m learning how that feels.

John:  You mean the inspiration of the Mysteries series with Sue?

George:  No.  That was Stiff.  Right before my nose but I couldn’t see it.  Once I got into it though and finished with George IV, I borrowed his stuff for things like Joseph Wilmot, Mary Price and that sort of thing, his Matilda, or The Misfortunes Of Virtue for instance.  You can see the de Sade reference. Sue plotted out the stories for me,  I mean I used them,  something like Maquet did for Dumas.  And then I rewrote them according to my own sensibilities.

Back to Stiff.  Nobody had any idea of how astonishingly successful the Mysteries would be.  I wasn’t even sure I wanted to do it, but Stiff promised a five quid note a week and always came through.  Two hundred sixty quid a year.  This seemed like a good deal to me for only a few thousand words a week. Coupled with what I could make on the side.  I had a of words in me and they were free to me.  Of course, as I came to realize I was making him a heck of a lot more than I was getting.  The end result was that he bought himself a damn good income and lifestyle for next to nothing.  Look how we’re living.

By the time I got into the second series though, I began to think that there’s something wrong here.  If my writing could make their fortunes, my writing could do a lot better for me, I thought.

In ’46 then, still under contract for Mysteries, I began my Reynold’s Miscellany that has been fairly successful as you know.  Somehow that brought us together.  I realized your genius from the beginning—no, no, I’m serious John, no need for false modesty with me, your integrity, the whole works.  So, when the second series was coming to the end, and the expiration of my contract, I had worked up the general outline for the George IV fifth and sixth series so were we’re ready to go as soon as I turned in my last clip to Stiff and refused to sign a new contract.

John:  They weren’t too happy with that, were they?

George:  I should think not.  Of course, I had foolishly talked about the George IV series, so they thought they were going to have that too.  That would have put them on Easy Street with me getting five pounds a week.  They owned the rights to the Mysteries of London, lock, stock and copyright. Owned the title.  If Stiff could have found a writer the Mysteries might have gone on forever.

Finding another writer wasn’t that easy.  They should have come to terms with me and shared the income more equitably but, as they said, a contract is a contract.  They apparently didn’t understand that contracts are written with a fixed term.  They got lucky with me but although I think Tom Miller who they signed next is a fine person and a very adequate writer neither he nor Blanchard who succeeded him understood the audience.  I, in association with you John, continued the success.

John:  Stiff and Vickers came unglued then in ’48 and forced you into bankruptcy proceedings?

George:  Damn ‘em.  That was more Vickers who lost a lot of printing business so the clod uses my name to try to make up for my loss.  Attacked the Miscellany, putting out a vile rag called the Reynolds something or other because he had some obscure typesetter with the name of Reynolds.  Got his though.  I know how they got me into that bankruptcy mess.  I only owed two thousand and by ’48 that was nothing what with the Miscellany and the beginning of George IV.  We were already bringing in that much each month.  Vickers was just being vicious, humiliated me and got nothing out of it.  Hope the villain is happy and rots in hell.

But that was then and this is now.  Look where Vickers is at and look where we’re at.

John:  I think your politics had something to do with that too, George.  Remember what year that was?  ’48?  Ring any bells?

George:  (laughing immoderately)  I thought that Revolution of ’48 was the real thing; an ’89 that worked.  Was I ever wrong.  Marx put that manifesto out in ’47, alerting the reactionaries as to what was coming and were they ever ready for us.  We were all riddled with spies.  Put the government is a tizzie though.  A little better leadership and it might have been done.  I wasn’t keen on the Communist stuff though.  Our Chartist idea was the best.  No violence.

John:  I was always of the opinion that revolutions mean violence.  Anyway, they smashed the revolution and the revolutionaries scattered like leaves in the wind.  Hope the Americans know what to do with them because they got a lot and the worst of them.

I always wondered, George, to change the subject a bit, of all your characters which was your favorite?

George:  The Resurrection Man of course.  Boy, did he really come from the depths of my subconscious.  Terrified myself more than he did my readers.  You know something though, John?  I think I had stumbled on to something but I didn’t know what to do with it.

John:  What might that have been?

George:  Remember Larry Sampson the leading detective of the Bow Street Runners?  And the hangman, Daniel Coffin?

John:  Yes.  That was strong, very effective.  But…?

George:  Better than strong, John.  I don’t know if you’ve read this American Edgar Allen Poe, he’s dead now, tragic story, collapsed and died on the streets of Baltimore.  Tragic death, tragic.  Great artist.  He wrote a story called The Murders In The Rue Morgue.  Wonderful imaginative tale.  He has an intellectual sort of detective, C. August Dupin.  Initials spell CAD.  Good joke, what?  Poe was very intellectual keen on acumen.  He thought he was a genius, probably was.  Dupin solves the crime in the Rue Morgue, an impossible closed door mystery, sitting in his armchair.  Acumen you see.  I appreciated the acumen but I thought a true detective would keep records and biographies and with the information would be able to lead him more quickly and accurately to probable perpetrators.  Thus, I introduced Lawrence ‘Larry’ Sampson of the Metropolitan Police, chief of the Bow Street Runners.

John:  Your old friend Paul Feval has written a book, John Devil, in which he introduces  a master detective from Scotland Yard by the name of Gregory Temple.  Have you read that?

George:  No, not yet.  Have you read any of Feval’s Black Coat series?  The crime network he portrays reminds me of our Johnathan Wild who had criminal London pretty well organized in the last century.  Wild in turn reminds of Vidocq, the head of the Paris Surete.  Francois Vidocq, who died a couple years ago by the way.  Vidocq was a nasty criminal and obviously the greatest of con men.  Imagine hiring a master criminal to be he head of police!  There was a scandal.  Just like Wild he was amazingly able to recover stolen goods without having to arrest a thief?  Same routine Wild was running.  The thieves stole and got a commission from the money Wild received for returning the stolen merchandise.

 

Prindle:  Reynolds was of course right that the detective novel would become, or perhaps, was already becoming at the time he wrote a new genre.  For the origin of the detective story most people nominate Poe and then trace it through a series of French writers leading up to Emile Gaboriau who has supposed to have been the inspiration for Conan Doyle’s great Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson.  From there it was off to the races.

Reynolds seems to have been overlooked as an early source.  I’m sure that Doyle would have read Mysteries of the Court and have noted Sampson.  Doyle used both acumen and a thorough record system.  It can’t be proven, of course, but Reynolds was a staple for nineteenth century proto-pulp fiction, especially before the adventure novel of the Rider Haggard type and the detective stories of Conan Doyle and his epigone.

Certainly, during Doyle’s boyhood and youth Reynolds would have been essential reading along with W.H. Ainsworth, Bulwer Lytton and James Malcom Rymer.  These writers were very popular throughout the nineteenth century while becoming passe at the beginning of WWI.  They were old fashioned and didn’t fit into the post-war world.  Thus they dropped out of literary history, if the Penny Dreadful, pulp writers, were ever a part of it.  Back to George and John.

 

George:  Speaking of criminals, that reminds me of those criminal Americans who respect no writer’s rights.  It’s bad enough that they pirate my own works but they have the audacity to hire writers and then publish their stuff under my own name.

John: (laughing)  You must be very popular in the United State.

George:  I should hope so and maybe you laugh.  Maybe I could sue over appropriating my name but I don’t think there’s a chance of success.

It’s not just a book either, listen to these titles:  Ciprina or, the Secrets of the Picture Gallery, Lord Saxondale, Count Christoval, Lucrigia Marano, The Child of Waterloo or, the Horrors of the Battle Field. And there are more.  I must be an entire industry over there.  There might be dozens more under my name.  People must think I’m a super-man, turning out not only my own works but these other people under my name.  My god, don’t they have sense of decency?  What’s a poor writer to do?

John:  Speaking of that, I’m thinking of beginning a series called Dicks’ English Novels.  I’ll have twenty or so of your novels plus your favorites by Dickens, Ainsworth, Bulwer-Lytton along with your favorites Notre Dame de Paris and Dumas’ Queen Margot.  All your major influences except Byron.  What do you think?

George:  Any money in it?

John:  Should be.  All of it’s still popular and we’ll get it out at prices that will shock the industry.

George:  Interesting.  That sounds very good John and I’m sure that it will be a great success.  We’ve worked together for ten years or more now, and a very successful partnership it’s been.  Now that I’m about finished as a novelist and going to work for the newspaper perhaps with your plans we should make our relationship a full partnership.  Does that sound feasible to you John?

John:  Very satisfactory George.  It would make me proud.  Together I think we can make John Dicks the most successful publishing house in England while educating those the most that afford it the least.  We can change the face of England and make it a better place.  I want to get the prices down as low as possible.  Without the paper tax we should be able to cut costs.

George:  If you get the type any smaller John and keep our readership you may obtain both goals.  I don’t know how those type setters can set such small type.

John:  Quite a skill, I can assure you.  I’d like to be able to invent a type setting machine where there are keys for the alphabet and punctuation marks so that the type setter can punch keys and the letters fall into place.

George:  I’m sure someone is working on it.  The steam press itself is a modern miracle.  It would be impossible to get out the tens of thousands of papers and books we get out every week without them.

John:  Yes.  We’d be making a lot less money than we are now anyway.  Quite a machine.  By the way, George, I’ve got a suggestion.

George:  Yes…

John:  Well, as you know the government’s pretty unhappy with the Miscellany.

George:  Yes…

John:  It think we could get rid of some pressure by discontinuing it.

George: (unhappy but aware of the problem)   Discontinuing the Reynolds Miscellany?

John:  Not exactly getting rid of it but changing the name anyway.  I’ve got an idea for a magazine I’d call Bow Bells.  We could fold the Miscellany into it, under my editorship.  It would be the same program but a little less…uh…er…aggressive, to keep the hounds off us.  Doesn’t have to be done right now but something to think about, maybe.  I’d really like to do it George.  They haven’t forgotten ’48.  That still rankles them.

George:  How would that affect the newspaper?

John:  Not at all, not at all.   That would continue under your editorship and I would edit the combined Bow Bells and Miscellany.  Just a thought.  We can keep it in the back our minds  I’ve got some newer writers in mind.

George:  Hmm, newer writers.  I know your concern, John, and it is something to consider.  I’ll consider it.  I am getting pretty tired and fourteen years of turning out a zillion words a week has taken its toll.  My brain doesn’t have the elasticity and vitality that it used to have.  You see, I know how Dumas feels.  Things don’t come as easily anymore.  That would be a load off me.  Let me think about it.

John:  Let me say that I really admire your energy George.  The ten years or so I’ve been working with you have been amazing.  I wish we had The Mysteries of London from Stiff and Vickers.  What a catalog that would make; Mysteries of London and Mysteries of the Court.  I’d even throw in Mysteries of Old London, the Days of Hogarth.  Underappreciated but it has one of the greatest tales I have ever read.  My land, what an outstanding three works.

George:  Oh, flattery…flattery.  Keep it up. (laughing)

John:  Just the truth, George, just the truth.

 

Part IX of Time Traveling With R.E Prindle continues.

WWII: The Greatest Crime Of The Ages.

WWII:  The Greatest Crime Of The Ages

by

R.E. Prindle

German Must Perish! and The War Goal of World Plutocracy by Theodore Kaufman and Wolfgang Dieverge,  reprint of the two 1941 editions by Ostara Publications, no date.

The history of the Second World War of 1939-45 is not as the orthodox version describes.  That history has been molded and shaped to conform with the desires of some interested parties.  In other words, it has been falsified.  The skewed history is more than merely one of interpretation.  Whole swaths of incidents have been suppressed, obscured or forced into a false narrative.  While your attention has been directed to a certain narrative, the real story lies exposed like geological strata.

I offer concrete undeniable facts to bring your attention to what was really going on.  The demonstration will focus on a book published in 1941 by one Theodore Nathan Kaufman.  Kaufman was an operative of the American Jewish Committee, the AJC.  For those not familiar with the AJC it is the directing governmental body of Jews in the United States.  It is essentially an espionage unit spying on the American people dedicated to rooting out what they are pleased to call ‘anti-Semites.’  They were also behind the effort to lead the United States into the war with Germany.  Their whole goal was to destroy Germany physically and to commit the genocide of 80 million Germans.

I know you are shocked and in total belief that 80 million people could be murdered but you shouldn’t be.  After all, the Chinese autocrat Mao Ze Dong murdered thirty million or more of his fellow Chinese and the world said nothing.  Not that much of stretch from 30 to 80 million.

Consider the facts: In 1933 the AJC executive, lawyer Samuel Untermyer declared irrevocable hatred of the Germans and war on the Germans.  Then began a whole series of boycotts and sanctions against Germany from the United States, a nominally neutral country by law.  This was done by its newly elected Democratic president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, FDR.  FDR as he is familiarly known was in the pocket of the Jewish governing body, the American Jewish Committee.

There were six key nations fighting this proposed war:  England, Russia, France, Germany, the United States and the Jewish Nation, the last spread out through Europe and the Americas.  The Jewish Nation was very carefully screened so that there would be minimal appearance of their maximum role.  They made themselves appear innocent victims while they stoked the fires of war.

We should be clear: there was no chance that Germany could win the war and this was against the combined might of the Soviet Union in the East and the United States to Germany’s West.  Zero chance and this was recognized by the warmakers at the time.

We now get to Theodore Kaufman.  Remember as he was writing his screed it was acknowledged that Germany could not win the war.  At the time Germany Must Perish, Kaufman’s book, was published England, France and the USSR were one block.  Germany Must Perish was published in March of 1941 before Germany had invaded the USSR and nine months before the US declared war on Germany.  So neither the US or USSR was at war with Germany of the time of publication.  Yet Kaufman was calling for the extermination of the Germany.  By whom then?

The agitation for US entry was conducted by England, Roosevelt and the American Jewish people.  England because it could not defend itself after being the first people to declare war on Germany in 1939.  England, because the country could not defend itself needed the US to fight the war for them.  England had neither the men nor the resources to even think of getting into the war on its own.

The Jewish Nation because the Jews wanted the whole German nation exterminated.  Kaufman explains:

Quote:

Today’s war is not a war against Hitler.  Nor is it a war against the Nazis.  It is a war of peoples against peoples….  This war is being waged by the German people.  It is they who are responsible.  It is they who must be made to pay for the war.

Unquote.

Remember that in 1933 the Jews declared war on Germany with no response from Germany.

So then, who is this Theodore Nathan Kaufman?

He was an AJC operative.  He is portrayed in the US as an insignificant shopkeeper from the Jewish colony of Newark, New Jersey.  A mere voice in the wilderness, perhaps a crazy Jewish prophet.  But, as a crazy Jewish prophet he publishes from the remote Newark Jewish colony a screed like Germany Must Perish calling for their total erasure from the Earth.  This book was not ignored, instead it was given maximum countrywide attention.  No such crank would have had access to the President of the United States but Kaufman did, no penniless shop keeper from Newark can launch a multi-million dollar campaign to publicize his book.  That just doesn’t happen.  He was a member of the AJC and the AJC was spending millions and millions on espionage, publishing books by the score while Jewish attorneys were filing lawsuits on every side.

Now, these deeds, these books, these acts have at the very least been disregarded or obscured, if it were possible to erase such a public campaign all evidence would have been scrubbed.  But, Kaufman and his book are inescapable evidence, not only fact, but concrete evidence of the activities of this Jewish Nation to draw the US and its resources into their, not the US’s, but their fight against the German people.  The war was between the Jewish Nation and the German Nation with the Jews as the aggressors.

The American People had no dog in this war but the Jewish People as Kaufman said, did.  What dog did Roosevelt have in the fight?  Why was he anxious to sacrifice the lives of tens of thousands of men in the prime of their lives?  Why was he so willing to strip America of its tremendous resources to badger a country that was no threat to the US?  Forget all that today Europe, tomorrow the world stuff.  Even if the Germans fancied it, had they conquered the whole of Europe including the Soviet Union, they would have been exhausted and unable to keep what they had.  That’s right, the Germans would never have been a threat to the US.

The Soviet Union unaided and without immense US supplies would have defeated Germany, it might have taken longer but as Stalin knew when he declared:  God is on the side of the big battalions.  Germany could not have won the war.  FDR certainly knew this.  Why was he subservient to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics? No contradiction there.  Because he was a socialist if not a Communist.  His old World War I master, Woodrow Wilson was a socialist.  FDR’s administration was a continuation of Wilson’s.  FDR even faked the League of Nation under the name of the United Nations through thus completing Wilson’s heritage.

Ah, I hear voices saying, you can’t genocide eighty million people.  The AJC and Kaufman thought you could.  It was simple.  You’ve heard of Eugenics haven’t you?  Of course you have.  Kaufman’s plan was simple.  You simply sterilize all Germans of child bearing age and children.  As Kaufman said, who was probably frightened by the word castration, sterilization doesn’t mean castration.  Sterilization for men is a simple operation, a little more complex for women.  I see no reason to examine the techniques of such a plan but if you have seen pictures of Germany bombed flat, Germans carving dwellings out the ruins,  ‘honorable allied soldiers’, American soldiers, turning German women into prostitutes with Hershey bars, you will realize how easy it would have been.  The plan only lacked will and it became within an ace of happening.  By Americans.

The Jews of course were ready.  The hitch came when Americans, less the Jews, were horrified at the notion.  The plan had the tentative backing of FDR and it was only his death on the eve of the end of the war that blocked the plan.

If we remember Kaufman’s book was published in 1941 before Germany had invaded the Soviet Union or the US had entered the war.  Kaufman’s was a pre-emptive plan.  Thus the representatives of the Jewish Nation had the system of genocide in place, Total War, before the Final Solution of the German Jewish problem was put into effect.

The Germans naturally were aware of Kaufman’s book shortly after publication, so it follows that the Final Solution was a variant of what Kaufman called the Total Solution of the Jewish Nation’s German problem.  Therefore, much of the Final Solution is mitigated by the Total Solution.

As to whether the whole Jewish People was responsible, Kaufman said that this was a war between peoples—the Jewish Nation versus the German Nation.  The Jews initiated its Total War, the desired end of which would be the total extermination, genocide, of the German People, that is a holocaust.  So, how can the German People be found guilty of attempting the genocide of the Jewish People except as an act of self-defense?  The slaughter was of course terrible, but so was the murderous war against Germany.  And that war was conducted with the full overwhelming power of the USSR and the USA against them.  Fleets of nightly bombers from the West and relentless artillery barrages from the East.  Germany had no chance of winning such a war; its doom was clear.

In March-April of 1941, then, the Germans learned of the Jewish menace.  They were horrified.  Copyright laws prevented the book from being published in Germany.  For whatever reason the law abiding Germans honored the copyright law.  The Germans were sticklers for the law and thus observed it refusing to print the book and alerting the German People of this threat from the Jewish People.  This side of story has never been told.

However, the Germans did print reviews of the book using extensive quotations which were ‘legal’ under copyright laws. A pamphlet was published by the German government titled The War Goal of World Plutocracy  by one Wolfgang Diewerge.

What Dieverge called the World Plutocracy meant the Jewish led coalition against Germany.  The title failed to indicate the urgency of the real issue, that of the declared war of the Jewish Nation against the German Nation.  Perhaps the Germans meant to implicate England, the US and Russia as well as the Jews which was a mistake.  Four nations were involved but only three countries.

There is more than one legal system with its laws and customs involved here.  On has the English and American variations of the Common Law, Soviet law, German law and Jewish law.  Today all countries are using a variant of Jewish law.  Under Jewish law the defendant is considered guilty and can only mitigate the charges.  Thus we have the situation in the US today of the Judeo-Liberal party that alleges that the accused is guilty, or he or she wouldn’t be accused would they?  Thus, the crime can only be resolved by accepting the guilt of being ‘wrong’ and accepting the judgment of the Party.  Bear in mind that in this so-called democracy the Jewish-Liberal party isn’t even the majority.  They are a minority that has appropriated the government regardless of who is president.  Thus, it is false to think we live in a democracy when we live in a Jewish flavored theocracy.

2.

Given that the Jews can manage the writing of history and the dissemination on knowledge and control discussion of the narrative it should come as no surprise that the German side of the story is suppressed.  The narrative is cast in the form of The Children Of Light vs. The Children Of Darkness.  All right then resides with the former and all fault with the latter.

As it is clear that the Jews first broached the notion of genocide when they were managing the overwhelming power of the US and USSR it follows that to avoid a German holocaust that the Germans were justified in a pre-emptive Jewish holocaust.  Both holocausts were to be managed in a scientific manner.  Thus, the Germans have no more cause for guilt than the Jews.

As might be supposed, since the plan for German genocide was trumpeted loudly throughout America, free copies were sent to influential people, Time-Magazine gave an approving review, newspapers nationwide disseminated the plan in an approving manner.  It should have been one of those things read with incredulity.

At the time the America First Committee was lobbying very actively, very actively, to prevent the US from entering another European war.  The American public was decidedly against any involvement in the war.  In March of ’41 a war with Japan seemed a remote possibility.  Roosevelt touted democracy and freedom yet he disregarded the vast majority and put US soldiers on the front lines both in the Pacific and the Atlantic.

And then we have a Jewish appeal for a German holocaust.  Without the US having yet no sinews of war, no will to war, what were the Jews thinking in making such a strange proclamation?  As Charles Lindbergh pointed out in his Des Moines speech, the Jews were finagling the US into a criminal war against Germany.  Forget any notion of a good war.

The Germans quickly obtained copies of the book or pamphlet that had been distributed to millions in the US with a copy sent free to every influential American.  The Germans were aghast.  Had the death of eighty million people ever been proclaimed before?  By a nation that refused to call itself that publicly?  Pretending to be Englishmen, Frenchmen, Russians, Americans, whatever.  The disguise was total and the danger was real.

The Jewish government presented Kaufman as an anonymous loner, something like Lee Harvey Oswald who may have fired at President Kennedy.  But was he? He was no fanatic rejected by World Jewry, no insane creature, but rather a leading and widely known Jewish figure in the United States.

The Germans published their answer to Kaufman in a pamphlet by Wolfgang Diewerge titled The War Goal of World Plutocracy.  He did a little research and came up with this:

Quote:

The Jewish president Kaufman is no anonymous loner, no fanatic rejected by World Jewry, no insane creature but rather a leader and widely-known Jewish figure in the United States.

Unquote:

Diewerge then says that Kaufman was a member of Roosevelt’s Brain Trust.  I’ve never read that before but then one can’t be sure that orthodox histories are ‘definitive.’  Diewerge goes on:

Quote:

He belongs to Roosevelt’s so-called “Brain Trust”, the staff of intellectuals and political advisors to the American President.  This circle provides the material for the hateful speeches against National Socialist Germany that President Roosevelt like to give…

The half-Jewish mayor (mother was Jewish) of New York, La Guardia, along with Roosevelt’s close confidante and friend, Bernard Baruch (“the unofficial president of the USA) also belongs to this group, which maintains closest ties to the leading men of the Soviet Union.

Unquote.

Baruch wasn’t so much a confidante and friend of FDR as a Grey Eminence giving direction to FDR.  As the war progressed and Kaufman’s proposal was tentatively accepted by Roosevelt, Kaufman’s plan was adapted by Secretary of the Treasury, the Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr. who did bill himself co-president with FDR.  Thus while Baruch was actually co-president with Woodrow Wilson during WWI, Morgenthau filled that role with Roosevelt.

Diewerge goes on:

Quote:

The book Germany Must Perish is the background music to the major policy deception that the leaders of the world plutocracy, President Roosevelt and his business partner in international warmongering, Winston Churchill, have launched to support their ally, Stalin.

Unquote.

That was an accurate description.  Stalin, by the way, was the brilliant mastermind pulling the strings of Churchill, Roosevelt and, actually, Hitler.  All three were duped by Stalin.

While Roosevelt preached Total War against the ‘aggressor nations’, unconditional surrender,  while the US was neutral after a fashion, Diewerge gives the German side of who the aggressors were:

Quote:

A digression is in order here.  Who declared war on 3 September 1939?  England and France used the local conflict over Dantzig and the Corridor, where justice was indisputedly on the side of Germany, to declare war on Germany and thus cause a world conflagration.

Unquote.

This was true.  Germany saw itself as rectifying the injuries it endured by the one-sided Treaty of Versailles.  It was also true as Diewerge was right when he next records:

Quote:

And the United States has been trying to “get into the business” for months with repeated provocations.  It prays daily for another “Lusitania” and regrets the case of the “Athenia” German attentiveness ruined their finely spun plans.

Unquote.

So, who were the aggressor nations?  First in order is the Jewish Nation with its proclaimed war of peoples.  Second was Stalin and the Third International, then Churchill and England and tied with Churchill was Roosevelt.  The Versailles Treaty that was designed by England and France in 1918 guaranteed another war in twenty years as was recognized at the time and as it happened.

Now, as to the Jewish desire to exterminate the Germans, consider how the war was fought:  there were actually two operations going on at the same time.  One was the war of land battles fought with armies and one was merely a series of bombing raids to destroy German cities, that is Germany, bomb it out of existence and bombing civilians to kill racial Germans.  In other words, aerial genocide.

During the war only the Anglo-American group had heavy bombers; the others had only tactical support bombers to support the ground troops.  The English developed the Landcaster with the capability of carrying twenty-thousand pound bombs along with incendiaries.  The Americans provided huge fleets of the smaller B-17s and then the bigger B-29s.  In a one of a kind situation that won’t be seen again the huge flotillas  of these behemoths dropping long strings of bombs, you’ve seen this in movies, with no other purpose than killing civilian Germans and destroying Germany.

The crowning achievement was Churchill’s decision to bomb the city of Dresden which at that time was packed with German people, women and children, displaced by the war.  Purely murderous.  There was no war industry there and not a single anti-aircraft gun.  Flotillas of bombers flying over low unloading everything from ten ton blockbusters to scads of incendiaries creating a fire storm.  This was purely a raid against unarmed civilians.  A holocaust pure and simple.  And if one horror wasn’t enough, they came back the next day to bomb the ruins.

As will be remembered, Kaufman and the AJC said that this was a war against a people- the Jews vs. the Germans.  Certainly the terrific bombing campaigns leveling German cities and killing millions was no less a crime than the Germans killing their avowed Jewish enemies in extermination camps like Auschwitz.  One might say tit for tat.  Also remember that the English was the aggressor, declaring war first.  Also, the bombing began long before the death camps were put into operation so one cannot say that the camps were not retaliatory.

Dresden was not like the end of horrors for the Germans but merely the beginning.  While the English and Americas were bombing the hell out of the civilians, the Eastern front against the Germans had been collapsing in an orderly fashion but tens of thousands of German troops had been captured and were never seen alive again.  They died in the Gulags where the camp commandants were with one exception were Jewish.

Once again, the fate of the German immigrants in Russia had little or nothing to do with the war.  Prior to the unification of the Germans under Bismarck, the Russian Czars had invited German colonists to settle in the Ukraine and the Volga Delta.  Always orderly and industrious the Germans prospered farming the Ukraine making that underpopulated desert bloom.  The contrast between the Jewish, the Russian and the German farmers was sharp and distinct.  Germans quickly moved to prominence in the government.

Then, when Germany consolidated all the petty principalities that the West found amusing,  into a unified State, and began functioning on modern Western methods they became a threat being more capable than the English and French, while the Czars began to view their German citizens although thoroughly Russified as a potential Fifth Column and persecuted them.  Thus German hatred began to grow.  Disabilities were placed on the Ukrainian and Volga Germans.  They were discriminated against.  When the Soviets replaced the Russians and Stalin replaced Lenin, the former minister of minorities collected the Volga Germans en masse and sent them to Siberia for extermination.  Thus, combined against the Germans in WWII were the Soviets in the East and Americans in the West and the Jewish Nation distributed throughout in influential, directing positions.  If you think the Germans could not see what was going on you should question your analytical abilities.  Actually, Germany was fighting for survival.

As the Soviet armies breached the German border, the ever clever Stalin who had thought this moment out thoroughly drove the civilian German population before him.  This horrific rout is described as a population transfer by orthodox historians.  One must question their analytical abilities.  The East Germans then murdered and raped by the advance troops were driven pell mell westward in the depths of winter.

The entire East German population of twelve to fifteen million people were displaced in a moment, driven West.  Such intense and concentrated suffering had never been seen in the world and this includes the child’s play of Auschwitz.

The Soviet armies consisted of primitives who had never seen a wrist watch before and were entranced.  They had never tasted real wine.  They had never had their way with beautiful White women.  Now they tortured and raped to their hearts’ content.  Women were gang raped like the flotillas that bombed Dresden.  You have to be heartless not to understand and sympathize.  Auschwitz?  Phooey!

In the dead of winter, ill clad and ill fed, at risk every moment these millions upon millions of wretched people fled just in advance of the total destruction of their destination.  They arrived in Berlin just in time for the most fearful artillery bombardment ever. The Soviets made up for their lack of bombers with terrific and devastating artillery bombardments.  Now remember, the Soviets had only been enabled with these abilities because Roosevelt stripped America of its resources and was supplying Russia with the sinews of war.  Thus the Americans. In effect, were giving it to the Germans both East and West, materially.

Berlin was completely destroyed blown into bits of rubble.  That anyone survived this terrible onslaught both from the air and from the land is a miracle

Now, I was brought up to believe that American soldiers where saints who though brave were never brutal.  And I believed what I had been told.  I didn’t question the propaganda.  And then, my elders made a mistake- they taught me how to read.  And I resent how terribly I was misled.

The Americans were hardly less brutal than the Soviets under the direction of Dwight David Eisenhower.

Kaufman said that the war had nothing to do with Hitler but that it was a war between the Jewish and German peoples.  As such the shooting war ended in 1945; the war of the Jewish people on the German people didn’t.

The Americans and Soviets drove the Germans down but now the Jewish people wanted to finish the job, enforce their plan.  As the Anglo-American and Soviet troops entered Germany for the Jews then, don’t forget Dresden, the horrible truth of the extermination camps was revealed.  The Jews were appalled and now in power over the Germans could get on with exterminating them.  But there was a hitch, Roosevelt died.

In the US the Kaufman Plan had morphed into the Morgenthau Plan of the Secretary of State, Henry Morgenthau Jr.  Roosevelt would have carried out the plan except that he passed in April of ’45 a month before the shooting war ended.  His replacement, Vice President Harry S. Truman was completely ignorant of the plans of the FDR cabal.  Truman entered office with no knowledge of the State of the Union.  Even though FDR was sitting with his feet dangling in the grave he didn’t think it expedient to inform his obvious successor of the state of affairs.  Did he think that his cabal was so evil that Truman would be repulsed?  Let me put it this way, Truman was repulsed when he learned what was going on.  Among other things on his mind was his discovery of the Manhattan Project and its Atom Bomb.  Blindsided by Rooseveltian politics.

However Truman was not so sympathetic to Jewish machinations as FDR had been.  Thus their power was broken.  As members of what might be called FDR’s shadow government they faded away.  Samuel Rosenman, perhaps the closest to FDR no longer had any place in DC.  Sidney Hillman was gone.  Henry Morgenthau himself tendered his resignation unable to work with Truman.  Truman gladly accepted it.  The tyranny of FDR fairly quickly evaporated.  A weight was lifted from the American people.  Don’t think there wasn’t rejoicing either.

While Truman was being quickly briefed on the actual state of affairs, the mopping up operations in German continued more or less according to the Kaufman/Morgenthau Plan.  The Supreme Commander in Europe was Dwight D. Eisenhower.  His advisor and confidant was Bernard Baruch, a man who wanted to be the greatest Jew of all time, and who was, indeed, a very large ranking member of the Jewish World Government. 

As mentioned, he had actually been co-president with Woodrow Wilson during what could now be called WWI.  He had meddled with Republican politics during the interim of 1921-33 and came into power again with the Roosevelt Administration in 1933.  Diewerge described him as co-president with FDR which is not exactly true but may have seemed so to outside observers.  The relationship was more adversarial, but face to face Baruch was able to intimidate FDR.

 Dwight Eisenhower had been disciple of Baruch’s for twenty-five years.  Eisenhower considered him the wisest man alive.  There was a tremendous furor at the time as to how to treat the Germans.  The Jewish faction wanted to dismember the German State completely parceling out the German territories to the surrounding countries.  The dividing of Germany into Allied administrative units perpetually occupied was decided upon.  The German people were to be kept impoverished and starved to death with no relief.

Eisenhower had under his control several German armies.  Although the shooting war was over and there was absolutely no chance of Germany conducting any resistance these men were not released nor, were they treated humanely according the Geneva conventions.  Eisenhower mean to destroy as many as he could.  Remember that Bernard Baruch had direct connections to him and wanted to further the murder of the Germans.  Hence Eisenhower unilaterally declassified them as soldiers and reclassified them as enemy combatants who were not covered by the Geneva Conventions.  The men were crowded together in open fields with no covering and no amenities, ill clothed and ill fed.  Civilians were forbidden on pain of death for comforting them in anyway.  Women trying to pass food through the barbed wire were shot down without compunction.

Nor did this criminal conduct end quickly but was continued until 1950 when the Americans, England and France realized that they needed a buffer state between themselves and the Soviet Union.  And so, the war in the West came to its grudging end.  The Soviets were much more brutal, so much so that there was a continuing drain from the East German Sector of the USSR as Germans fled to the West necessitating the building of the Berlin wall.

As may easily be seen the orthodox version, the academic version, of the period is so distorted as to be a fantasy of the reality.  The root of the war as per Kaufman’s plan was the Jewish Nation’s hatred of the German Nation.  That hatred went back many centuries and was fully developed.  Having essentially captured the US, England and USSR governments the Jewish Nation was able to direct their energies toward a Total Solution of their German Problem which was the total genocide of the German people.  WWII was the greatest crime ever perpetrated.

All this has been obscured and ignored and hidden if not nearly erased.  The world is so conditioned to view the period from the Jewish point of view that they find the truth incomprehensible.  To expose that truth is to expose one’s self to many hazards.  Many such people now have permanent homes in prisons.  Laws in nearly all countries have been passed to make even the objective discussion of the period a criminal offence, France and Germany being the worst offenders with England close behind.  They must protect their narrative at all costs.

And so, nearly a hundred years after the war goes on unabated.  Circumstances have changed but the situation hasn’t.