Immigration, Damon Runyon, And New York City

Immigration, Damon Runyon,

And New York City

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In the 2019 March-April issue of Foreign Affairs devoted to discussion of the idea of New Nationalism, Jill Lepore a Harvard Professor of History opens the discussion with an article entitled:  The New Americanism.  No, she isn’t talking about Pres. Donald Trump.  Her proposition is this:  Why a Nation Needs a National Story.

Apparently Liberals have given up on the idea that there is no such thing as a nation.  Even a social construct needs a reason to exist.  I quote here first two paragraphs:

Quote:

In 1986, the Pulitzer Prize-winning, bowtie-wearing Stanford historian Carl Degler delivered something other than the usual pipe-smoking, scotch-on-the-rocks, after-dinner disquisition that had plagued the evening program of the annual meeting of the American Historical Association for nearly all of its centurylong history.  Instead, Degler, a gentle and quietly heroic man, accused his colleagues of nothing short of dereliction of duty: appalled by nationalism, they had abandoned the study of the nation.

“We can write history that implicitly denies or ignores the nation-state, but it would be a history that flew in the face of what people who live in a nation-state require and demand,” Degler said that night in Chicago.  He issued a warning: “If we historians fail to provide a nationally defined history, others less critical and less informed will take over the job for us.”

Unquote.

I empathize with Prof. Degler’s concerns, however ‘nationally defined history’ already exists and has existed for some time, it is called the Immigrant Narrative of American History.  According to it ‘Americans’ are good people, indeed, the very best but only because we have opened our hearts, minds and national home to immigrants from wherever and whatever condition provided only that they be colored, POC (People of Color); that is, not White.  We know by this narrative that Whites have caused all the ills of the world while not deserving to live.

In the nineteenth century, it’s true that after the country became a nation in 1793 the immigrants, much to our shame today, were White, with the exception of African Negroes who were needed for work that White people wouldn’t do.  That immigration would have the direst consequences even though the Negroes are good hearted POC who wouldn’t never do nobody no harm.

The principle port of entry was NYC, first at a facility called Castle Gardens and then the fabled sacred site of the Immigrant Narrative, Ellis Island.  It was there that the ‘wretched refuse’ of ‘Europe’s teeming shore’ as Emma Lazarus’ poem quaintly expressed it and she pasted it on the base of the Statue of Liberty.  Thus the Immigrant National Narrative was enshrined.

They were coming to America as the Jewish poet Neil Diamond sang in the twentieth century from every country in Europe and a great many of them stuck in New York City giving that town its peculiar character.

Immigration was cut off at the knees by Conservative bigots beginning in the 1920s coinciding with that abominable experiment, Prohibition.  This was a license to steal for the immigrants.  Whoo, boy howdy, was that a combination- immigration and prohibition.  A third ingredient was the introduction of women’s suffrage.  The ladies obtained the vote.  And somewhen at this time the Hero of our national narrative also arrived in NYC, Damon Runyon.  He was the redoubtable historian with the national narrative much longed for by Carl Degler.

Damon Runyon sat in his favorite hangout of Mindy’s Deli in the heart of NYC’s Satan’s Square Mile and surveyed the scene.  Of course, his history is fictionalized but no matter it is accurate, playfully accurate.

Some will say his history is too one sided but then so are all national narratives, they’re all fictional too, cut to measure from the whole fabric.  It’s something like Einstein’s ‘fabric of space and time’ which no one has ever seen or touched but is still an article of faith.

For those who don’t know Damon Runyon, perhaps America’s least known historian, who wrote about ninety years ago, you may have seen an even more fictional representation of the work in the movie Guys And Dolls starring Marlon Brando and Frank Sinatra, two legendary characters that were once flesh and blood, if you follow them, in 1955 nearly seventy years ago if you’re still too young to remember.

So, Damon Runyon sat studying the immigrant type for that is what he portrays.  The key nationalities that he describes are the Irish, the Sicilians and the Jews.  The main Irish influx arrived in the 1840 and hence were the most assimilated, but only partially so, while the Jews and Sicilians were in the gold rush to America from 1890 to 1914.  Those two groups were all only partially assimilated, the Sicilians least of all.

In Runyon’s stories they are all criminals.  Like, who else hangs around in Satan’s Square Mile?  Runyon really romanticizes these criminal types.  Without knowledge of the situation they were all a bunch of lovable guys and dolls.  Who could not like the Butch of Butch Mind’s The Baby.  The only problem is that Butch is a killer wherein the humor of a thug minding a baby.

I first became acquainted with Runyon’s stories when I was sixteen.  Perhaps my attention was called to him by the movie Guys and Dolls that was released at that time.  Not being familiar with the context I was entranced by Runyon’s undeniable Flash.  I was knocked off my feet and remained so until the last several years.  Over time I reread the stories with a fair amount of regularity, each time gaining in worldly experience and a deepening sense of reality as to the deeper meaning of the stories content.

I still read the stories with some regularity having acquired original copies of the collections and a number of collections from a few stories to omnibus comprehensive collections.  However when I now read it is with a sickening realization of their underlying brutality.  For instance, the story, The Old Doll’s House, that particularly enchanted me, that involves a thug evading a shoot out in the process of which he jumps a wall and seeks refuge in the Old Doll’s house.

The Old Doll, we’re talking Guys and Dolls here and all women are Dolls, is a lady of advanced years.  As she is blind she can’t see the thug waving his gun around and pleased to have company invites him to tea.  Orienting himself the thug sees a clock that reads 12:30 which is the approximately correct hour.  A half hour later it still reads 12:30 and that clues him in to the fact that the Old Doll is blind. Now he won’t have to kill her because she can’t identify him.

The story stops being funny on the third or fourth reading, twenty or thirty years later.

And so with all the stories.  Dream Street Rose for instance.  On a first reading Dream Street has a figurative meaning but in fact, Dream St. is a couple of blocks in Satan’s Square Mile.  When they designate the square mile as Satan’s they aren’t just whistling Dixie either.  That square mile was the criminal sink of NYC, the US, the world and without doubt the universe and beyond.  The Metropole Hotel was there.

If you start researching Runyon’s characters you find people like the Jewish newspaper columnist Walter Winchell.  If you want a fictional portrayal of Walter Winchell view the movie The Sweet Smell Of Success.  And then there is the Jewish criminal mastermind called the Brain by Runyon who was Arnold Rothstein.  The Brain Goes Home is pretty much a true story.  The stories in their own way are real and out of the clothing of ‘poetry’, true.

At this time and experience in my life I find the stories blood curdling, even the Lily of St. Pierre, one of my favorites.  You need a little background to understand Lily.  St. Pierre is an island in the North Atlantic fishing grounds, back when the cod were plentiful.  During Prohibition the Mob moved in and used the island as a way station for booze.  St. Pierre et Miquelon was a French administrative unit.  So, the world was corrupted by Prohibition and ‘American’ immigrant criminals.

Of course, as ‘Americans’, these partially assimilated Immigrants blackened the eye of native Americans who were tarred with the same brush as these ‘American’ criminals.  And in the United States according to the Immigrant National Narrative those natives were styled ‘bigots’ and racists for declining to accept responsibility for what were actually native Europeans activities.

So, Miss Lepore and her hero Carl Degler, the ‘American’ historian may find no national narrative lacking; they’re just not looking in the right place.  The national narrative may not be very attractive but then it’s not very American either.   Immigration has consequences.

Foreign Affairs And The CFR Discuss Nationalism

Foreign Affairs

And The CFR Discuss

Nationalism

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The March-April 1919 edition of Foreign Affairs so its cover proclaims, is a discussion of nationalism resulting it hopes in a New Nationalism.  I wasn’t too impressed.  The contributors are one step ahead of high school papers.  The issue might better have been called the New Globalism but put that aside and let us just interpret the image of the cover.  Perhaps subconsciously the CFR indicates its true mission.

The cover is a black and white composograph of a mass of forearms giving the Communist power salute.  You know how symbols go.  The Jews for instance co-opted the Star of David as a symbol of the Jewish nation in the Middle Ages.  As every organization needs a symbol to represent them, in answer to the Jewish symbol the German National Socialists adopted the ancient symbol of the Swastika in the twentieth century.  The National Socialists borrowed the Open Palm stiff armed salute from the Italian Fascists who in turn had borrowed it from the ancient Romans.

This left the Communists with a yellow hammer and sickle on a red flag for a symbol but no hand symbol.  Well, there were clever Communists too and they came up with the clenched fist and bent elbow salute.  Very attractive in a rough and ready way.  So, after, 1917, that salute represented the look out world, we’re taking over, defiant power salute.

Whether consciously or unconsciously the CFR globalists have adopted the aggressive Communist power salute.  That sign basically means get in line or we’ll kill you and this is verified by numerous incredible holocausts.

Above the raised fists emblazoned on the cover are the words:  The New Nationalism.  Communism is a one world universal or global ideology so one is led to think that New Nationalism is globalism under a disguise that, so to speak, leaves unbelievers without a country, or nation without a leg to stand on, outside the pale of Communist civilization and hence disposable.  The threat is palpable.

And then on page 42, one Richard Sopolsky, a Professor of Biology, Neurosurgery and Neurology and Neurological Sciences at Stanford University relates this parable under the title of The Biology of Us and Them:

He never stood a chance.  His first mistake was looking for food alone; perhaps things would have turned out differently if he’d been with someone else.  The second, bigger mistake was wandering too far up the valley into a dangerous wooded area.  This was where he risked running into the Others, the ones from the ridge above the valley.  At first, there were two of them, and he tried to fight, but another four crept up behind him and he was surrounded.  They left him there to bleed to death and later returned to mutilate his body.  Eventually, nearly 20 such killings took place, until there was no one left, and the Others took over the whole valley.

The protagonists in this tale of blood and conquest, first told by the primatologist John Mitani, are not people; they are chimpanzees in a national park in Uganda.  Over the course of a decade, the male chimps in one group systematically killed every neighboring male, kidnapped the surviving females, and expanded their territory.  Similar attacks occur in chimp populations elsewhere; a 2014 study found that chimps are about 30 times as likely to kill a chimp from a neighboring group as to kill one of their own.  On average eight males gang up on the victim.

 

If one compares this parable with the cover symbol one might be led to believe that what we have is an instructional tale.  In fact isn’t this what, more or less, the Antifa Fascisti are doing.  Isn’t this what Hillary Clinton was hinting at when she called opponents Deplorables.

As the Red hero, Victor Hugo, said about the Chouans, that they would never accept the Liberal Dispensation and hence they must be destroyed, eliminated, and in fact that’s what the French Revolution did, the French Revolution was the first great modern holocaust.  And then came another and another and yet another.  Is there any reason to imagine that we have reached the end of the great holocausts.  It may be too soon to tell and then…once again.

There is more of interest in the issue so I’ll tackle it a little further in another post.

Pt. 2b-4 Mysteries of the Second Thirty Years' War

Eugenics and Dysgenics Pt. 2b-4

Mysteries of the Second Thirty Years’ War

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Continued from Pt. 2b-3

-III-

If you remember the myth of Cadmus in Boeotia, who created a civil war the same can be said about the Jews and the Europeans beginning in 1914.  There was no compelling reason for WWI.  Austria and Serbia was an internal situation used by some anarchist shooting an Austrian prince.  Why Russia mobilized against Austria over some slipshod notion of Pan-Slavism isn’t clear.  Once Russia mobilized against Austria Germany felt compelled to mobilize against Russia in support of German ruled Austria.  England and France had no dog in the fight but attacked Germany.  Once a war begins there are unintended consequences, however the intended consequence was happening per Cadmus’ plan; the Europeans were in a civil war and slaughtering each other in droves.

In order to stop the slaughter the Germans attempted a peace initiative in 1916.  In the same year the US industrialist, Henry Ford, rented the ship the Oscar II, dubbed the peace ship, sailing to Europe in the hopes of stopping the war by Christmas.  Neither Ford nor the Germans were successful as the British and French, who had already lost the cream of their manhood, chose to continue the incredible slaughter, a mass suicide of Lemmings.  While the European nations were slaughtering their own, what was the semi-autonomous Jewish nation doing? 

The first Russian Revolution driven by the Jews was unsuccessful.  But, if at first you don’t succeed, try, try, again.  The Jewish hatred of Russia and the Czar was increased by the 1905 failure.

So long as the Czar and Russia were allies of France and England the Jews refused to aid them.  They backed Germany that was at war with Russia.  The February Revolution of 1917 led by the Jews and headed by the Jew Kerensky, kept Russia in the war.  But, the October Bolshevik Revolution eclipsing the one of February took Russia out of the war removing them from the Allies and leaving the Germans in control of South Russia.

The Zionists, always trying to make the best of any disaster, negotiated with the British to give them  Palestine as a Jewish State.  They succeeded and the British published the Balfour Declaration empowering and embolding them shortly after the Red October Revolution.  At that time the Jews threw whatever support they had behind the Allies.  Having removed the Czar they now aimed to remove the Kaiser.   Absolute rulers had to be removed; democracies were easier to dominate and manage than monarchies.

The US had entered the war after the February Revolution and would now provide France and England with victory.  The US entry into the war would change the US overnight.  It is thought that Mussolini invented Fascism but the US beat him to it in 1917-18.  The US set the organizational method for Fascism, National Socialism and Communism,  and that was done by a Democratic president.  All three systems studied the astonishing US model and adapted their systems to it.

One almost thinks that the Euroamerican mentality was reordered at that time.  It would appear that the US led the way.  It was also true that Fascism, National Socialism and Communism are different variations of Judaism and at this point in history amidst the Jewish Revolution engulfing the US, Europe and Russia it is probably no coincidence.  Both the US and Russia at that time became Jewish dominated States while all the various national Communist parties were predominantly Jewish.

It was at this time then that Wilson made the arch Jew, Bernard Baruch the Czar of the War Industries Board and actually a co-president with himself.  To call Bernard Baruch a Czar is not exaggeration, he had true autocratic powers granted by Wilson and he wielded them.  The WIB under Baruch made the US vertically integrated.  All individuality disappeared, subsumed under his unlimited power.

You may smile at what you might consider an extreme exaggeration but read.  Baruch was in charge of the whole industrial life of the nation.  He could order who made what and when and how.  Under the emergency powers of the war he was in charge of all commodities.  Using the excuse of the war he did form a deal with the shoe manufacturers under the impress of conserving leather to reduce all shoe styles to three. 

His powers existed from March to the armistice in November of 1918.  He was in the process of limiting women’s apparel to six different dress styles.  And men’s clothing also.  This would have realized a Socialist concept of equality.  Steel corset stays had been dis-continued to conserve the medal.  This seemingly reasonable thing was to change sexual mores, following Freud.

Now, Baruch worked closely with George Creel who ran the CPI, Committee for Public Information.  Creel was thoroughly regimenting the American mind.  It was the most extraordinarily conceived effort at mind control ever made by any State and it was successful.  If you will examine the period you will readily see why the Fascists, National Socialists and Communists were aghast in admiration.  Fortunately for the US the war was ended before Baruch could complete his plans although the lessons learned from his actions and those of Creel would influence the future and the US never has recovered the freedom of the Gilded Age.  Those freedoms were quickly labeled laissez-faire and laissez-faire was condemned as something immoral.

Baruch’s reign as Czar began in March of 1918 and mercifully ended in November of the same year.  But, in those few months he changed the direction of US society lasting to this day with no real letup in sight.  He was severely criticized post-war.  Neither he nor Creel were allowed the same powers during WWII, kept at a distance.

On p. 27 of American Industry In The War Baruch himself says this:

The Board has been criticized as an institution with tremendous power and no responsibilities; that democracy created a tyrant with power to shatter ordinary rules of business practice even to the extent of undoing contract obligations.  A fuller study of what was done will modify this conception.  That the powers of the Board were of a quality easily susceptible to abuse and of a kind that should be entrusted only to men of extraordinary integrity and talent cannot be denied.

While not actually denying the charges, only modifying them, Czar Bernard then portrays himself as a man of extraordinary integrity and talent who could be trusted.  However as the Jews denied these qualities to Czar Nicholas, while his loyal subjects accorded such attributes to him, it is much more likely that Baruch’s detractor’s were right.  Certainly Henry Ford and the Dodge brothers might disagree with Baruch’s opinion of himself.  On p. 406 Baruch goes a little further:

During the World War, government had the power to commandeer factories and to operate them under bureaucratic direction.  I do not recall a single important industrial enterprise that was thus taken over.  This does not mean that the use of the power was never advocated.  On the contrary, it was seriously urged in respect of a great industrial plant which was thought by some not to be giving full cooperation to the government.  The proposal was split on the rock of this argument:

“Who will run it?  Do you know another manufacturer fit to take over its administration?  Would you replace a proved expert manager by a problematical mediocrity?  After you had taken it over and installed your government employee as manager what greater control would you have then than now?  NOW you can choke it to death, deprive it of transportation, fuel, and power, divert its business, strengthen its rivals.  Could any disciplinary means be more effective?  If you take it over, you can give orders to an employee backed by threat of dismissal  and with far less effect than you give them now.  Let the management run the plant and you run the management.

 

It is quite clear who this manufacturer was, it was Henry Ford he was talking about.  Be clear, Baruch was violating every tenet Americans believed of themselves.  Baruch was putting an end to the individualist mindset and replacing it with a Jewish collectivist mindset.  Note the controls that Baruch already had and was using.  These means were the same that the Order of B’nai B’rith was employing through its Anti-Defamation League.  This was clear to any right thinking person.  Under this phony emergency of war Americans were obedient in a way they would never have been otherwise.  In Freudian terms the whole corpus of the US was being hypnotized through a traumatic mind set to accept direction from Baruch the Magician, i.e. the hypnotist.  This acceptance of his sole direction, a dictatorship, an authoritarian mode, would have post-war post-hypnotic consequences.  Of course not all the people would accept the hypnotic suggestion and Henry Ford was one of them along with the Dodge brothers of Dodge Motors.  Now, both the Dodges and Henry Ford strenuously objected to Baruch’s methods, and that to the point where members of the WIB were advocating taking Ford Motors away from Ford.  Ford’s so-called unexplainable anti-Semitism is becoming more explainable. 

Baruch trembled at the thought because there was no one else in the world capable of coming in cold to run the great River Rouge plant; the most vertically integrated plant in the world.  Ford owned forests, iron mines, the whole works including a glass factory to mass produce his windows.  Before Ford it was impossible to mass produce the millions and millions of glass panes that he needed nearly on a daily basis.

Baruch’ plan wasn’t as good as he thought even though he believed himself that man of destiny of extraordinary integrity and talent.

Here’s an insight from James Grant’s Bernard Baruch: The Adventures Of A Wall Street Legend pp. 178-80:

Just as Baruch reached his financial maturity in the early Bull market, so he hit his political stride in the First World War.  In both cases his timing was impeccable.  In the first instance he moved stocks in a rising market.  In the second he was present at the creation of the twentieth-century American state.

Having made a fortune in Wall Street under a system of low taxes and limited government, Baruch entered public life to help install a regime of relatively high taxes and intrusive government.  When he arrived in Washington the public debt was less than $3 billion, personal income taxes were trifling, and national economic planning was alien to the American experience.  On his departure in 1919, the public debt totaled $25 billion, tax rates in the top bracket had climbed more than ten fold to 73%, and federal control of economic life was firmly established.

War is a dragooning proposition, and in America, as in other belligerent powers, the divergence between the professed liberal aims of the fight and its wartime conduct was ironically wide.  In the name of liberty, the United States government conscripted troops, censured the mails, took over the railroads and telegraph lines and fixed the price of wheat.

Bitter arguments ensued in which the Dodge brothers made ready reference to his ethnicity.  It wouldn’t have taken a genius to recognize the Jewishness of Baruch’s plans.  According to Baruch Ford made no ethnic references but denounced the plan as totally unnecessary, which it certainly was.

As I say, Baruch’s job lasted only a few months and so he was talented enough to realize Ford’s great River Rouge plant would quickly go to pieces under a mediocrity, he had to make the best of an undesirable situation.

However as an extraordinary and talented person in the Jewish tradition he took the opposition as an insult and never forgave it with consequences, although he boasted that he never bore grudges.  So he wasn’t quite the man to wield such total power.  Circumstances returned him to ordinary citizenship but with a huge reputation although he had incurred the distrust of others.

After the war came the realization that the Jews were up to something and a worldwide reaction, especially to the takeover of Russia that was rightly seen as a Jewish operation, was begun.  And they were, and it was, but the Jews were compelled to deny it and go to some lengths to defuse that reaction.  The post-war reaction was a critical point in the Jewish program.

In point of fact after the October Revolution Jews were in control of the Russian State.  In the US they poised to seize the government and a state of incipient revolution existed through 1920-21 with many incendiary acts.  Civil war raged in Germany and Central Europe with the threat of Jewish takeovers.  In France and England the Jews through the Rothschilds influenced those governments.  Had the Jews succeeded in Russia and the US the two mega-States bookending Europe would have been unassailable and the whole of Europe would have had to capitulate.  The Jewish revolution was within a hair’s breadth of succeeding.

The US plan went wrong when Wilson had an incapacitating stroke allowing the rump of the post-Civil War Gilded Age GOP regime to retake office for twelve years.  The German troops returned from the Western Front, defeated the Jews in Germany preventing a complete takeover while the rest of Central Europe kept the Jewish Communists at bay, sometimes at great cost.

Jewish damage controlmen went into operation gearing up the propaganda machine, calling all and sundry anti-Semites and denying all charges.  And they succeeded in defaming any objectors.  And their activities were obvious to an alarmed Europe and US.

At this time in the US the President of the American Jewish Committee, founded in 1906, Louis Marshall came into prominence backing up Baruch and others, especially the chief terrorist arm the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith.

While Henry Ford formed the front line of action taking the brunt of abuse the country itself rose up to demand compliance to 110% Americanism, now that the war was over and dissenting voice were allowed to be heard again.  The days of the Committee of Public Information were over.  These people alarmed by what they felt was less than enthusiasm for war aims demanded that the immigrants proclaim not one hundred percent Americanism but one hundred ten percent.  One may consider them counter-revolutionaries denouncing Communist influence.

One must remember that the Communists appeared like a bolt from the blue forcing their vision on the whole of society, and this violently.  When Wilson’s Attorney General, A. Mitchell Palmer rounded up batches of revolutionary Communists imprisoning some and sending some back to Russia, including Leon Trotsky, the high percentage of Jews was evident.  The rising Jewish influence in Wilson’s government, his main support, was noticed.  Taken by surprise, if that seems possible, non-Jews didn’t know what to do about it except for Henry Ford.

Ford set about to expose Jewish machinations.  He had the ways and means and the determination.  It was a two decades battle that he ultimately lost.  Some, many, considered it incomprehensible that Ford became what Jewish propaganda defined as the arch-anti-Semite, the US Great Satan of the inter-war period.

That seems odd, not so much that the general population found it incomprehensible but all so-called scholars from then to the present day found and find his activities inexplicable.  Of course, they do have to keep their jobs and any opinion the Jews find offensive will put the offender on the street.  This is the most blatant censorship but the Pavlovian conditioning to fear being called an anti-Semite is so powerful as to be almost a law.  What could be more obvious?  The War Industries Board and Bernard Baruch.  Ford had his own ideas, different from those of Baruch.  As noted above Baruch found Ford a real thorn in his side and would have liked to have nationalized Ford Motors but to do so would have meant botching the country’s manufacturing abilities.

Ford was the state of the art in industrial production.  His centrality to the period has faded away in time now but as the chief developer of mass production Ford was the most famous person in the US through the teens, twenties and thirties.  Repeatedly he had done the seemingly impossible, revolutionizing production from top to bottom.  When it comes to the WIB Ford was the industrialist while Baruch was more a Wall Street manipulator and speculator.  Not to say he wasn’t a good organizer and intelligent man but the gloss of the speculator was all over him.

As a Jew it was psychologically impossible for him to not organize according to Jewish methods and those favor the Jews.  As part of his requirements he wanted every manufacturer in the country to provide their fiscal data and operating and manufacturing methods.  Ford quickly divined that all that information in the hands of the Jews would be used to manipulate American business in their favor.  He objected vociferously causing Baruch to wish he could nationalize Ford.  Between the Dodge brothers and Ford Baruch felt greatly insulted, injured and although he claimed to never hold a grudge he was a very vengeful man.  And he didn’t necessarily stop at murder.

In 1920 both the Dodge brothers died under mysterious circumstances.  Baruch himself  in his auto-biography tells the story of the death of John Dodge.  In 1920 after the beginning of Prohibition Baruch ‘accidentally’ met John Dodge in the lobby of a New York City hotel.  John Dodge apologized for the harsh negotiations during war time and invited Baruch up for some bootleg liquor.  Baruch self-righteously declined while noting the Dodge died from cheap bootleg liquor that night.  And then Horace Dodge died. And then an attempt was made on Henry Ford’s life when he was forced off the road at night.

He survived but the Jewish defamation and propaganda squad went to work suggesting Ford staged the accident himself as a publicity stunt.  You may be sure that the most famous man in America didn’t need publicity stunts.  So, Ford had plenty of good reasons to denounce the Jews unrelated to any irrational anti-Semitism.  Nevertheless his reaction touched off a full fledged Jewish-Ford war that would last for more than two decades ending in the total defeat of Ford.  One can sense Baruch’s hand behind the scenes all the way.

 

Continued in Pt. 2b-5

Election Strategies

Election Strategies

by

R.E. Prindle

 

It is time to develop election strategies here on the grass roots level.  There is no reason to leave matters up to the RNC which has proven itself singularly incapable.  Obviously the key issue is immigration.  The key point there is that we have more ‘new citizens’ than we can assimilate.  The ‘new people’ have been elected.  All our resources both human and material are fully stressed.  Stressed to the breaking point.

While the Wall is important and should still be pressed it is also useful to present other talking points.  One might be the example of a balloon that can only hold so much air before it bursts.  We being at the point where one more puff of immigrants will burst the balloon.

Another might be that of a cake that when baked to perfection must be removed from the oven lest it burn and shrivel.  The lesson being that immigration has reached that level where more baking will be destructive.

And then there’s that good one- think of the children and their future.  What sort of conditions are we creating for them?

Any such point can be introduced without jeopardizing your job or standing- or worse.  One says merely that while one has no quarrel with immigration per se, one is worried because….  That will keep you on the safe side.

Doubt must be sown among the least dogmatic of the Libs.

Write your Congressman, local TV newscasters or even national newscasters.  Submit them to a barrage.  Make your opinion known; use different names and addresses.  Maybe the ‘Russians’ will pitch in and help.  Who knows?

Now is the time to act.

Global Warming And Immigration

Global Warming And Immigration

by

R.E. Prindle

 

A fear of global warming and an affection for unlimited immigration are two positions in what ought to be called the demented Holocaustian religion of the West.  The two positions are contradictory.  At the same time that the Holocaustians, or Liberals to shorten the name, want to increase immigration to catastrophic levels the land area of the US is decreasing as the sea rises to cover it.

The rising waters will force an internal migration that will shift tens of millions of people from soon to be inundated locations while the remaining land surface will be unable to support the huge population. Tens of millions will die.  This is especially troubling as the Eastern Seaboard which will be most severely affected by the rising waters is the most heavily populated.  Cities such as New York, Boston, DC itself will be uninhabitable while vast stretches of arable land will disappear beneath the waters.

Major population centers such as the Houston/Corpus Christi and the whole Texas/Louisiana coast will disappear including New Orleans.  Southern Louisiana is already disappearing.  Florida especially is threatened.  The whole peninsula is barely above water.  Already areas are being flooded.  Perhaps the whole peninsula will be inundated.   Where will these tens of millions of internal migrants relocate as they compete for space with the tens upon tens of millions of external migrants being brought into the country by the Liberals?

While the Liberals quake in fear of global warming they continue to call for an ever-increasing population on an ever shrinking land surface.  Are they actually thinking about the future or are they reactionaries living in a dreamy past in which ‘immigrants built this country?’  While immigration may have been beneficial in 1900, mainly to the immigrants themselves, it has no place in today’s overcrowded US.  We abolished slavery, now let’s abolish immigration.

As the waters continue rising the resources of the US disappear.  The ability for the country to subsist with the present day population can’t be maintained.  The West of the US is a dry area from California to Washington and from Oregon to the borders of Missouri.  The West cannot accommodate millions of immigrants.  Already our quality of life is declining.   Rivers have been dammed, water has been sucked out of the earth making devastating forest fires inevitable.  The last twenty years have seen the devastation increasing yearly.  Less land surface and more people isn’t going to help.

One can only hope that our President can put an end to senseless immigration.  One applauds his decision to recognize the futility of ‘fighting’ global warming by pulling out of the Paris Accords.  Now, let us hope that he has the equal courage to stop immigration in its tracks.  None, not one, is the solution.  To create incalculable misery down the road for hundreds of millions is not the ‘humanitarian’ result immigrationists should be shooting for.  Sometimes humane intentions produce inhumane results.  Use your clout, Mr. President, brush the objectors aside.  They’re losers.

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The website 23&Me ran a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal today. (6/20/17) titled Everyone Deserves A Place In The World.

The ad posits this possible fact:

Over 65 million.  That is the amount of people who have been forced from their homes worldwide.  Continuing conflicts and political instability…continue to displace more and more people each day.

 

I’m sure the above is trueish.  The implication is that someone, obviously in more stable areas, should take them in because,

…we still have a tendency to focus on differences when we talk about humanity

I’m not sure that the conclusion drawn from the premise follows.  This is known as fuzzy thinking.

We see otherness when we should see kinship.

We see “them” not “us”.

 

But on a genetic level, human beings are 99.5% identical.

 

This is pure scientific fact.

 

I don’t know how pure that science is or even if it’s a fact, but I do know this:  I can’t run as fast as Usain Bolt.  Something tells me that there’s more than .5% difference between us.

The ad goes on to implicitly call for the more politically stable US and Europe to take in all 65 million.  There is a basis to compare the facts of taking in just a few million to taking in 65 million.  I’m not just talking the logistics.

Europe, Canada and the US have taken in several million Moslem displaced human beings who according to 23&Me are nearly exactly like us, but do they think the same.  Only .5% difference but we are all 100% human beings.

Just a few million displaced persons have created constant turmoil in the once stable European countries of Sweden, Germany, England France and Italy.  Our fellow human beings have colonized cities and large areas from which they exclude “us”.  These areas are called no go zones for “us”.

Our fellow human beings (99.5% identical) have murdered innumerable “usses” in terrorist attacks, they have raped countless women and blamed the rape on them because they were inappropriately dressed.  In other words they wore European clothes rather than Moslem clothes.  That’s all it took to justify rape in Moslem minds. (99.5%)  They have bullied thousands of men who are forbidden defend themselves lest they be jailed as Islamophobes.

Yes, 23&Me they share 99.5% DNA but are they 100% grateful human beings?  Did I mention that among their crimes they coerced thousands of underage English girls into prostitution?  Does that affect you at all?

Are there 65 million displaced persons in the world?  Are you aware, 23&Me, that in a couple decades, by 2050, when the world population increases by a billion or so that there may be over 200 million or more displaced persons?

I don’t think your heart will be big enough to contain them.

Thanks for the lovely sentiments.

President Trump Vs. The New York Times

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The press continues to represent President Trump as a fool.  The New York Times, one of the most unbalanced of the President’s critics ran an article by Peter Baker titled ‘Will Trump Take Brutally Forthright Advice From General McMaster?’

The Times seems to think the President and McMaster are equals rather than superior and subordinate.  Trump is not only the Chief Executive of the US but he is also the Commander In Chief of the military.  That means he has a higher rank than any General or Admiral of the armed forces.  Each and everyone including McMaster, a Liberal plant, owes the President not only obedience but the respect due to a higher rank.

General McMaster does not speak brutally to his Commander In Chief.  Hopefully all his advice as a subordinate will be given in a forthright manner so as to leave no room for misunderstanding but respectfully.  If what Mr. Baker of the Times means by his title is whether President Trump could take in new information or a different representation of facts, I think the answer is a resounding ‘Yes.’

Consider that as a builder Mr. Trump had to rely on a number of specialists to construct his buildings who knew much more of their specialty than Mr. Trump did.   For instance, if Mr. Trump wanted a feature that was impossible it was the architect’s duty to say whether or not the request could be done and suggest an alternative if it couldn’t.  There is no reason to suppose the President would be less reasonable in dealing with General McMaster’s suggestions not based on alternative politics.

However, if, as the Times’ Mr. Baker suggests, McMaster disagrees with President Trump’s ideas on immigration that is outside the field of a military man’s competence and becomes a mere different political opinion.  I hope Mr. Baker can tolerate my own blunt disagreement with his own opinion.  However, as always the Times prints opinion pieces and calls them news.  Always the pieces are not only critical of the President but demeaning to him.

Mr. Baker goes on to quote a Max Boot of the CFR, obviously Mr. Baker considers him an ultimate authority:

The difficulty is that Trump has a lot of crazy ideas in his head- like we should steal Iraq’s oil or we should kill the relatives of terrorists or we will ban Muslims coming here.’

 

One asks Mr. Baker, crazy to whom?  The President did not say we should steal Iraq’s oil, he said we should have appropriated it after we had gone to the expense and trouble of ‘liberating’ the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussain.  In fact, as I recall, preparations were being made to build pipelines when that small part of the population that didn’t ‘love’ us, the US ardently believed that the Iraqi people loved America and Americans, erupted into guerilla warfare and not so guerilla as all that.  Another war gone wrong.

Was President Trump responsible for that, or were the Iraqi people crazy too?

As far as killing your enemy’s relatives, historically this is more or less de riguer while ISIS seems to practice it along with other medieval barbarities.  The logic being those seeking revenge are eliminated.  While I personally do not endorse the practice along with Mr. Baker does he mean to call Moslems crazy too?

That makes his third crazy idea difficult to grasp.  Mr. Boot of the CFR thinks President Trump is crazy for wanting to ban Muslims.  As various surveys point out a strong majority of Americans agree with the President and disagree with Mr. Boot of the CFR and Mr. Baker of the NYT.  Are they, or we rather, crazy too?

Mr. Baker approvingly says that Mr. McMaster ‘brutally’ disagrees with the President on this issue, which is beyond his competence.  This is strange, need I say very strange because Moslem paramilitaries, commonly referred to as terrorists by those of Baker and Boot stripe are a danger everywhere.  As paramilitaries these Moslems are busily at work in most countries of Europe and the US causing discord and civil strife.

For some inexplicable reason, Messrs. Baker, Boot and McMaster and Liberals in general refuse not only to acknowledge Moslem asymmetrical warfare but deny it and that makes them accomplices.  Not to be snide, but one wonders how much they are being subsidized to deny the reality.  Is the New York Times on the take?

America First Is Globalism

America First Is Globalism

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Wall Street Journal continues to amaze.  Tuesday, May 3, 2016, p. A11, Bret Stephens posted to his column Global View what I imagine he considers a scathing denunciation of Donald Trump.  What Brett doesn’t seem to understand is that there is no particular virtue in globalism.  It is merely a state of affairs.  Donald Trump is a globalist, I am a globalist, we are all globalists.  We have to be, globalism is here and now.

If Bret believes that the Chinese don’t place China First, Africans don’t place Africa First and Moslems Moslems First he is dreaming fantastic dreams.  Trump says what everyone else is saying about their peoples; he is saying that yes globalism is here and in that context we have to place America’s interests before everyone else’s interests.  The White Man’s Burden has been laid down Bret; let that monkey ride someone else’s back.  In a dog eat dog’s world, Mondo Cane, one has to bark loud and bite hard not roll over and expose one’s tummy.  Those who roll over are called pussys, Bret.  No one respects them.  That is the situation our current leadership, so-called, has placed us.

The problem with you Bret is that you think your interpretation of globalism is the gold standard and there is no other interpretation.  Trump has bluntly stated the China First position:  they are raping America.  With impunity they hack our computers, take whatever information they want, as part of the cyber war.  We grouse but make no retaliation even though we have the means to shut their computers down.  To defend ourselves, if I interpret you correctly Bret would be a violation of globalism.

Further, China has no more respect for our borders than Mexico.  Chinese flood our country with illegals.  Bert apparently considers open borders ‘a reasonable immigration policy’.  Your opinion and your opinion alone Bert.  The better opinion is that no immigration at all is the most reasonable policy.  Your opinion is not sacred just because it is your opinion.   You are not the arbiter on immigration.

Bret insultingly says of Trump’s America First position:

Either Mr. Trump stumbled upon his worldview through a dense fog of historical ignorance.  Or he is seriously attempting to resurrect the most disastrous and discreditable strain of American foreign policy for a new generation of American ignoramuses.

You willfully misinterpret the phrase America First.  First does not mean only.  First means to look at international or global affairs considering one’s own welfare as paramount.  To impoverish ourselves to enrich others is the height of foolishness.  To use your example of England in WWII, the English if they had considered their own welfare first, would never have entered into WWII.  That war bankrupted them completely, impoverished them for a whole decade or more, left them a no-rate power and stripped them of their colonial empire and that with the connivance of FDR.

FDR himself stripped the US of its ‘inexhaustible resources’ in the short period of seven years, 1938-45.  He gave those resources away for free to enemies like the Soviet Union.  Stalin didn’t even say:  Thanks, Suckers; he said:  You got anything left? as he annexed the whole of Central Europe.

Neither England nor the US had any dog in the Nazi-Communist struggle so how were American Firsters disastrous and by whom were they discredited or, actually, defamed?  They couldn’t have been more disastrous then that fool FDR and they were discredited by those who wished the US ill.

Donald Trump probably knows his history better than you do Bret.  Better bone up on current scholarship; your understanding is outdated not Trump’s.

America Strikes Back

America Strikes Back

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The offensiveness of the Insider Party- that is, in the US, both the Democrat and Republican leadership if not Parties- has become intolerable.  Their disdain for the electorate has passed into the hostile.  While they may believe that their policies are above debate, we don’t.  In fact we reject them outright.

Recently the only sane voice in American politics, Donald Trump, quite rightly called for a cease in Moslem immigration.  This is necessary.  His call was denounced by the elite Insider Party as beyond belief.

No demand could be more reasonable.  While the previous three administrations have taken a high hand in Middle Eastern affairs their actions were not seconded by the American people.  Nevertheless the Moslems were and are guilty of extreme provocation.  They need to turn their damper down.  People who behead victims in public are not yet ready for civilization; certainly not for admission to the US.

Trump’s call for cessation of Moslem immigration was greeted by the American people, that is 80% of the population with a sigh of relief.  Trump’s further call for a forced exit of Moslems from the country was also justified.  Saving that, every Imam or religious leader within our reach should be placed in the concentration camps we read about for an intensive sensitivity course.  You know how many White boys have had those.  It might take years for the Imams to get it, if you know what I mean.

Many mosques should be razed and civil disabilities should be placed on Moslems not unlike the civil disabilities placed on White men in this country commonly called ‘hate’ laws.  Moslems gunning down celebrants at a Christmas party apparently don’t qualify as hate while throwing a pig’s head at a mosque does.

Further people pushing the Moslem agenda- Obama, Merkel, Hollande, Cameron, et al. should be tried for crimes against humanity of the magnitude of the Nazi war criminals.

Every one of the murders and casualties at San Bernardino should be charged to Obama who elicited and abetted them no less than Charles Manson in the Tate-La Bianca murders, now serving a life sentence in prison. 

Manson murdered no one himself, like Obama, but was convicted for enabling those who did also like Obama.  Obama is guilty on the same basis including the Marathon bombing with all its victims.  He not only encouraged the crimes but then threatened to severely punish anyone who retaliated against the Moslems.  ‘We are not that kind of people.’  Barry hypocritically intoned.

Oh yes we are, Barry.  Oh yes we are.  Yes, we can.

Obama and his fellow elitists should be arrested now, tried and executed.  We are not the kind of people who tolerate serial killers in office or out.