Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The website 23&Me ran a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal today. (6/20/17) titled Everyone Deserves A Place In The World.

The ad posits this possible fact:

Over 65 million.  That is the amount of people who have been forced from their homes worldwide.  Continuing conflicts and political instability…continue to displace more and more people each day.

 

I’m sure the above is trueish.  The implication is that someone, obviously in more stable areas, should take them in because,

…we still have a tendency to focus on differences when we talk about humanity

I’m not sure that the conclusion drawn from the premise follows.  This is known as fuzzy thinking.

We see otherness when we should see kinship.

We see “them” not “us”.

 

But on a genetic level, human beings are 99.5% identical.

 

This is pure scientific fact.

 

I don’t know how pure that science is or even if it’s a fact, but I do know this:  I can’t run as fast as Usain Bolt.  Something tells me that there’s more than .5% difference between us.

The ad goes on to implicitly call for the more politically stable US and Europe to take in all 65 million.  There is a basis to compare the facts of taking in just a few million to taking in 65 million.  I’m not just talking the logistics.

Europe, Canada and the US have taken in several million Moslem displaced human beings who according to 23&Me are nearly exactly like us, but do they think the same.  Only .5% difference but we are all 100% human beings.

Just a few million displaced persons have created constant turmoil in the once stable European countries of Sweden, Germany, England France and Italy.  Our fellow human beings have colonized cities and large areas from which they exclude “us”.  These areas are called no go zones for “us”.

Our fellow human beings (99.5% identical) have murdered innumerable “usses” in terrorist attacks, they have raped countless women and blamed the rape on them because they were inappropriately dressed.  In other words they wore European clothes rather than Moslem clothes.  That’s all it took to justify rape in Moslem minds. (99.5%)  They have bullied thousands of men who are forbidden defend themselves lest they be jailed as Islamophobes.

Yes, 23&Me they share 99.5% DNA but are they 100% grateful human beings?  Did I mention that among their crimes they coerced thousands of underage English girls into prostitution?  Does that affect you at all?

Are there 65 million displaced persons in the world?  Are you aware, 23&Me, that in a couple decades, by 2050, when the world population increases by a billion or so that there may be over 200 million or more displaced persons?

I don’t think your heart will be big enough to contain them.

Thanks for the lovely sentiments.

Comey of the FBI

And The Dark Government

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Since Pres. Trump’s election a ‘Dark Government’ has become a topic of conversation.  There may indeed be a dark government, perhaps several.  Ex-Pres. Obama is making a fool of himself by leading one as he interferes with Pres. Trump’s administration.  Dark Government?   Indeed, maybe more than one.

The government of the US is a vast sprawling project where many duchies ruled by ‘warlords’ may exist.

Comey of the FBI in his congressional testimony may have inadvertently uncovered one, to which he belongs, the IC Community.  Intelligence Community of different agencies.  As Comey of the FBI describes it an IC agency had possible information of a salacious but unconfirmed nature about then Citizen Trump that occurred or may not have occurred, after all this was an unconfirmed rumor, many years ago.

The salacious, as we all know salacious means smutty, dirty, nasty, titillating, rumor was that Trump as a private citizen, completely unrelated to his present position, peed on a Russian prostitute in Moscow, Russia.  In the annals of perversity how horrible is peeing on someone?  American clowns gather on a hotel balcony beer in one hand and dick in the other and pee on a crowd below while laughing uproariously. 

As a sign of contempt in concert with fellow conspirators some guy gets behind a victim and pees on his pantleg.  That’s a big joke of the practical kind where only the perps are laughing.  There must be numerous more examples in the annals of peeing.  For all I know the government may at some time have spent a quarter million dollars to commission a study on the subject.

Nevertheless, the assembled chiefs of the IC Community gathered to discuss what to do about this unconfirmed rumor.  The IC could possibly have leather bound volumes numbering a hundred or more of unconfirmed rumors.  Who runs major investigations of unconfirmed rumors?  Apparently no one but the assembled IC chiefs of which Comey of the FBI was one.

Probably giggling wildly the assembled Chiefs have to determine who is going to carry the news from Langley to the White House.  Perhaps they spun a bottle to determine who but in any event the lot fell to Comey of the FBI.

Whether Comey ever gave the Pres. the news of the unverified rumor or not isn’t clear.  Comey in his testimony gives no indication of what the rest of his conversation with the Pres. was about because the Pres. out of the blue struck him dumb by asking where his loyalty lay.  Why did the Pres. ask him that?

Is it possible that Comey of the FBI had just relayed this salacious but unverified rumor to the Pres.?  Wouldn’t this cast some doubt about Comey’s loyalty in the Pres.’ mind?  Would it be unusual to ask:  Why are you telling me this?  How important can an unverified rumor be?

Let us suppose, I don’t know how he obtained the rumor, some Trump hating journalist learned of this, had this unverified rumor published.  Wouldn’t the word of the assembled Chiefs of IC calling it nonsense be enough to discredit the journalist and quash the rumor?  I think so.  There must be something deeper going on here.  In my opinion the reputation of Comey of the FBI is destroyed, not Pres. Trump’s.

A Review: Peggy Noonan: What Comey Told Us About Donald Trump

A Review:

Peggy Noonan,

What Comey Told Us About Donald Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

This is a review of the Comey/Trump Affair around Peggy Noonan’s WSJ article in the Wall Street Journal of 6/10-11/17.

 

First let’s put the Comey Affair into its set and setting.  The current Pres., Donald Trump has caused the greatest political uproar since the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  Roosevelt too was hated and vilified by what he called the ‘economic royalists’ that now hate Trump; different faces but same class.  Former Pres. Obama prior to the election stated that Donald Trump would never be president.  Trump’s political adversary, Hillary Clinton, thought her election in the bag only to find that the triumph went to her rival.

The news was crushing for these people who considered themselves an elite appointed by God to do His work.  Looking down on Trump’s base that they had given many derogative names such as the Deplorables, ignoramuses and whatever they now found themselves led by a man they despised personally who was the leader of this despicable mob of unwashed peasants, to use an antique term.

Their disappointed rage was so terrible that many government employees quit their jobs  while there was a near universal refusal by the remaining to cooperate in any way with the new President.  They put on their pussy hats and through a snit in the very streets.

Comey himself had a very questionable role in the election releasing potentially damaging information concerning Hillary Clinton.  The timing was suspicious.  Clinton was accused of much more damning activities than Trump is being accused of but that has been swept under the rug.  She is a Liberal.

So, while investigations have been going on for months and months now with absolutely no show of conclusive evidence, or indeed, any evidence at all, Congress chose to call a hearing at which the star witness was the FBI head who had already come up with nothing hence had nothing to report and in fact reported nothing.

So, really, what we have here is a show trial after the Soviet fashion.  Also what we have here are essentially fictional narratives meant to amuse and entertain.    Just before his appearance, Mr. Comey released publicly a seven page propaganda paper he titled:  Statement For The Record:  Senate Select Committee On Intelligence. 

Mr. Comey opens his short story, for that’s what it is,  with the words:

I was asked to testify today to describe to you of interactions with President-elect and President Trump on subjects that I understand are of interest to you.  I have not included every detail from my conversations with the President, but to the best of my recollections I have tried to include information that may be relevant to the Committee.

Reading this one comes to the conclusion that this meeting has no other relevance than perhaps a discussion of the Pres.’ personal habits.  Trumpian curiosities.  In other words, the Committee is frivolous.  Isn’t the real intent of the hearing to see if the Pres. is somehow criminally lacking.  Comey is the man who is conducting this investigation to find Trump criminally liable for something, anything; the Committee doesn’t care what just so long as they can get rid of him.  They think his election is a fluke and therefore doesn’t count.

And then Comey advises that he has carefully edited his testimony.  To give his edits credibility, apparently knowing that one day he was to be called to testify something about the Pres. he ‘took notes.’ Apparently Comey’s conversation with the Pres. was so far beyond Comey’s experience, and he is a man who should have seen everything, that:

To ensure accuracy I began to type (the conversation) up on a laptop in an FBI vehicle outside Trump Tower the moment I walked out of the meeting.

Hmm. An FBI vehicle outside Trump Tower?  Was Comey wired?  Was the FBI vehicle a surveillance truck?  Hmm.  Does the FBI have tapes of this meeting.  That might be illegal.

Sure, there are enough weasel words in those comments that mean Comey has effectively said nothing.  He has determined what the Committee wants to hear and presumably selected  the most juicy passages throwing the rest of the edits on the cutting room floor.  I wonder if Mr. Comey has ever been to law school where he would learn to talk in circles?

Now, Mr. Comey works direct for Mr. Jeff Sessions, Trump’s personally selected Attorney General and Mr. Sessions reports directly to Pres. Trump.  Whatever information that Mr. Comey uncovers should have been made aware to AG Sessions.  Was it?  And, if not, why not?  Sessions in his turn should have reported to the Pres.

But Mr. Comey does not speak through his boss Sessions.  No.  He says instead:

The IC (Intelligence Community) thought it important for a variety of reasons, to alert the incoming President to the existence  of this material, even though it was salacious and unverified.

Unquote.

I see, what we have is water cooler talk, a rumor jest and smirk.  In fact, the story that Trump pissed on a prostitute in Moscow several years ago.  One imagines the Committee members smiling inwardly at their recollection of the rumor.

As morally reprehensible as pissing on prostitutes may be, as a sexual perversion it is fairly common, even has a name:  Golder Shower.  And when it comes to minor sexual perversions, let the innocent stand up.

Wow, isn’t the country overjoyed by Trump’s exposure. (smirk, smirk, allusion intended.)

Now, perhaps I’m wrong but the FBI’s jurisdiction doesn’t extend to Russia.  CIA maybe, but not the FBI.  Yet, Mr. Comey was asked, not by AG Sessions but the Director of National Intelligence to deliver these remarks to the Pres.  ‘because the material implicated the FBI’s counter-intelligence responsibilities.  Oh.

And Mr. Comey said, holding up his right hand, this is the carefully edited selective truth, so help me God.

So, then, Peggy Noonan of the WSJ examines Mr. Comey’s selected and edited testimony.  Now, remember, Comey is no callow youth.  As Peggy describes him:

Whatever Mr. Comey’s reputation, and it’s mixed- an intelligent accomplished professional  who is plenty slick; state-of-the-art Beltway operator with an image of integrity, yet trailed with suspicions of slight smarm- he’s a careful man.

 

Then Peg quotes Comey’s relation of the face to face meeting on January 27, 2017 a week into Trump’s term of office when it might be said he is feeling his way in his new surroundings.  Already under extreme attack, rioting in the streets, hateful MSM media coverage,  Trump knows it’s going to be a tough haul.  Comey has had a questionable record prior to the election.  Sitting on this side of the screen I had to ask myself what Comey was doing?  What was his agenda?  Which side was he on?  His own?

Wouldn’t it be reasonable then for Trump to want to get a feel for where Comey was coming from?  We have Comey’s version of what he’s seeing in Trump but we don’t have Trump’s idea of what he’s seeing in Comey’s behavior.  The other side always gives balance.  What Trump does already know is that the civil service is up in arms against him, rabid Democratic Senators and Congressmen are obstructing every move he makes, if he jaywalks the MSM reports it as a major crime.  So is Comey working for him or against him?

The Pres. levels with Comey, according to Comey’s notes written down later when he has time to compose a narrative, the Pres. says:  ‘I need loyalty, I expect loyalty.’  Right!  Who doesn’t?  Damn right, he doesn’t need a smiling back-stabber; which is Comey, he wants to know, staring at him intently to capture his reaction.

This man of the world, Comey, this state-of-the-art Beltway operator, is struck dumb by Trump’s desire to know if he is going to back stab him or not.  Well, my God, Comey is speaking to Trump, the Liberals idea of the reincarnation of  Adolf Hitler.  Why wouldn’t Comey come to the conclusion that Trump was asking for a Hitlerian loyalty oath, hey?  It doesn’t seem he was to me, but what was Comey’s reaction to the simple statement of fact.  Why, Comey this Beltway operator was struck dumb.  This so far exceeded anything Comey had seen or heard deep in the Swamp of DC:  ‘I didn’t move, speak, or change my facial expression (No! He was a deer caught in the headlights)  in any way during the awkward silence (getting a little purple here) that followed.  We simply looked at each other in silence.’

Does anyone with experience and sense believe Comey’s reaction?  I don’t.  Trump didn’t ask for criminal collusion as Comey implies, he wanted to know if Comey was a back stabber.  All Comey had to say was I do my job without fear or favor from anyone.  I will deal with you with integrity.  I will not be influenced by the hatred that I know surrounds you.  I am not your man but I will protect your administration from any unlawful assaults.  You will have no reason to find fault with me.’

Bingo! That’s it.  What does Comey do, he says and I mean I do not believe him, that he froze in the headlights.  Some Beltway operator.

Peggy runs through the right or wrong arguments through the rest of the article.  Then gives away the farm.  She says:

Then again, a conservative intellectual with small town roots wrote, during the testimony, that he thought this might be a break point, a moment when Trump’s supporters would listen close and think he’s not so much like them, and not so different from the swamp he means to drain.  I myself don’t know.

Let me help you, Peg, didn’t you describe Comey as smarmy and slick at the beginning of your article?  Didn’t you say he was a state-of-the-art Beltway operator?  Do you not think us small town rubes saw that immediately?  Trump is doing his best against terrific odds and that is clear to everyone but Trump’s enemies.  No, we are not breaking, the deal hasn’t gone down, he may not survive the beatdown but he would still be a better man than all the people in the Swamp for all that.

How To Solve The Moslem Problem

How To Solve The Moslem Problem

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Europe and the US have no one to blame for their Moslem problem but themselves.  They developed a social system like no other social system that had ever existed on the planet.  Completely foreign to human psychology and then they expected the world to embrace it on first sight.  As might be expected, other more traditional social systems being confronted by what they considered a monstrosity considered the Western system to be an existential threat.  It had to be destroyed.

The most virulent of this opposition was aroused in the mind of the Moslem world.  But what was the method to be to destroy the West?  It was obvious that the pure military destructive power of the West could not be equaled by any effort of the Moslems.  Since military warfare was out of the question they resorted to an asymmetrical warfare taking advantage of Western psychology that they had thoroughly analyzed.

The Moslems learned the rules of Western society and how to violate them with impunity.  As I say the West has caused its own problem confident in their military superiority they bombed Moslem countries virtually into oblivion.  This created vast numbers of displaced persons who migrated into the countries that had just destroyed theirs.  These countries failed to see that they came as avengers intent still on destroying the Western social system and replacing it with theirs.

Once in place they began to put their asymmetrical methods into practice.  Their warfare methods were treated as crimes no matter how horrendous they were.  A perfect example is the bombing of the World Trade Center in the US, NYC.  This sensationally successful operation cost them nothing other than 19 dead operators.  Their explosives were two hijacked commercial airliners loaded with jet fuel which were flown into the towers.  The result was not only that the two towers crashed to the ground but several ancillary buildings also, the total value was billions of dollars, three thousand dead civilians and the disruption of NYC for months while people as far away from NYC as Portland, Oregon feared an attack on its lone tower.  The not very bright US president, George Bush, shut down the entire US for four days costing billions and fatally weakening  the economic structure of the US.  Bush’s further response was to spend trillions of dollars in a knee jerk reaction bombing the crap out of Iraq and Afghanistan.  This ran the national debt deep into the trillions of dollars.  Altogether this action that cost the Moslems nothing was perhaps the most successful military operation ever.

Not bad results for very little investment.

 In addition the Western reaction was masochistic. They treated this horrendous act of war as a mere crime, rounded up some hapless Moslems who may or may not have had anything to do with the assault and put them on trial in a court of law.  All the perpetrators died in the assault.  If it was a mere crime this situation ended with their deaths.  The Moslems must have thought:  These guys are suckers! We can take them!

Then began a peaceful invasion of the West aided by Western politicians whose motives are still unclear.  They’ve never been analyzed.  Thus, now going on decades, Moslems have been committing every type of act of war with impunity while colonizing whole cities including London, Paris and NYC.  In England, they recruited hundred’s perhaps thousands of young English girls to work as prostitutes, sanctioned by the government lest stopping it might be called, get this, racist.  No kidding.  Can’t you see the Moslems laughing their asses off around their hookah making obscene jokes.

They bombed the Boston Marathon injuring hundreds, the American masochistic response was:  Don’t go off the deep end here.  Not all Moslems are bad; these were terrorists.  Well, OK, then what?  The Moslems have been terrorizing Paris for a decade where dozens of cars are burned every night.  If what I read is true, Saturday June 10, 2017 Moslems are going to begin a terror campaign of suicide bombers, armed assaults with AK 47s, bombings and whatever that will continue until Paris is destroyed.  And France dithers.

In England the Moslems bomb a concert filled with children and all is forgiven. The West looks at a picture of a little Moslem child injured and goes off the deep end.  But, masochistically accepts the bombing of English children?  The Moslems get another big laugh.

Something must be done, the Moslems are about to conquer the West, but what?  Military operations are out of the question, we would merely be destroying ourselves.  OK.  Why not take a page out of the Moslem book?  What do the Moslems do when they conquer countries?  What will they do when they conquer the West?

Quite simply, they will impose civil disabilities.  Read your Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon.  I’m serious.  Go out and get a copy now if you don’t have one.

As Gibbon tells it, when the Moslems conquer a country they impose civil disabilities on the non-Moslem population.  Thus, even though the Moslems were a small part of the population they were able to control the much larger majority.  Among the disabilities the natives were forbidden to ride horses being restricted to asses and donkeys.  Those they had to ride facing backwards inculcating a feeling of inferiority and humiliation.  There was an extra non-Moslem poll tax and other humiliations.  Of course, one could escape these disabilities by converting to Moslemism.  Thus, the non-Moslem majority was turned into a Moslem majority.

In today’s struggle the Moslem minority, while having more chutzpah than a whole tribe of Jews, is attempting to seize control of the narrative by ceaseless atrocities that the silly West continues to treat as crimes thinking, I presume, to solve the problem by removing the perps from the streets.  Of course there is no bottom to the number of fanatics willing to be imprisoned or die.

The only possible solution to the problem that is viable is to impose onerous disabilities on the Moslems including a heavy poll tax.  The option of renouncing Moslemism is available otherwise Moslems would have to endure the humiliation of civil disabilities or leave for Moslemland.

I’m sure that those who haven’t realized that the old democracy disappeared with the Twin Towers, as the Moslems intended, will object.  They have to be overridden or we might as well turn Moslem now.  There is simply no other viable option.  Impose disabilities now.  Sent the Imams back to Arabia and make the rest shave their beards.

This must be done if the West is to survive and done now.  Let us hope President Trump has the courage to do the necessary.

First Thoughts On M'sieu Macron And His Granny

First Thoughts On

M’sieu Macron And His Granny

by

R.E. Prindle

 

He stuck a feather in his cap and called it macaroni.

 

One of the most remarkable and laughable political performances of the century took place on the stage of France recently.  It was almost unbelievable straight face stand up comedy.

This cute little guy who married his high school teacher twenty years older than himself has been elected by the French to represent them on the world stage in competition with big boys like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.  He self admits that he has no culture and neither do the French although I know of some perverts who are deep into French Culture so tell it to them.

Now, this little guy, cute as hell, M’sieu Emmy MacRoni who as far I know isn’t installed in office yet, stood up on the world stage and threatened Russia with dire harm from France then, turning from the East to the West he threatened the US, although this time he did invoke the EU.  Apparently he doesn’t know that the EU is a toothless tiger without an army.

He seems to be relying on the President’s vocal critics in the US as his support.

Even though his Granny was a teacher, she appears to have been a little light on geography.  Let me school M’sieu MacRoni in modern geography:  France is this tiny little country on the Western end of the European promontory; China at the Eastern end of Asia  could incorporate France into its empire off into some obscure corner and never trip over it;  India makes France look like an off shore island as it is also much larger while growing rapidly into an economic power.  These two Asian giants together rule world commerce while China is still organizing.

China is in the process of laying down a superslab highway along the route of the old Silk Road with ancillary highways.  This will tie together all of central Asia and with luck extend all the way to the French coast.  China will make the Mongol invasion a reality.

The world laughs at M’sieu MacRoni’s posturing.  He seems something of a bad farce to us.

The Russia that M’sieu MacRoni is threatening is incomparably richer than France; for instance, it has oil and gas reserves and France has none.  Think heating oil.  Tell you anything M’sieu MacRoni?

The US that M’sieu MacRoni is mocking has pulled France’s chestnuts out of the fire twice, 1914-18 and 1940-45.  US money set France back on its feet after WWII.  OK, let the dead past bury its dead.  Emmy MacRoni, who has no culture, has forgotten it so why shouldn’t the US.

The fact remains that the US also dwarfs France and the US and Russia combined are so large that France barely shows up on maps.  With a minimum of luck the US and Russia are going to combine.  This will leave the EU between the jaws of the anvil.  You know what that means.  The Eastern States of the EU, Poland, Hungary, Austria, Switzerland are already secession minded so the old EU is toast.  A new EU will be formed along rational lines.

So, really M’sieu MacRoni, keep your threats to yourself.  Be meek and mild, like you are to Granny, before your betters and cooperate fully.

We still honor the French culture you despise and say doesn’t exist but unfortunately it is going to be swept away in the course of events so it is irrelevant whether it exists or not except as a historical relic.

Accept the role of France in the near future.  France can be only a facilitator and not a leader.  On stage you act like you’re still in school before your teacher.  Those high school essays are cute but they have no place in the real world.  It takes more than strut to exist on the world stage.