Comey of the FBI

And The Dark Government

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Since Pres. Trump’s election a ‘Dark Government’ has become a topic of conversation.  There may indeed be a dark government, perhaps several.  Ex-Pres. Obama is making a fool of himself by leading one as he interferes with Pres. Trump’s administration.  Dark Government?   Indeed, maybe more than one.

The government of the US is a vast sprawling project where many duchies ruled by ‘warlords’ may exist.

Comey of the FBI in his congressional testimony may have inadvertently uncovered one, to which he belongs, the IC Community.  Intelligence Community of different agencies.  As Comey of the FBI describes it an IC agency had possible information of a salacious but unconfirmed nature about then Citizen Trump that occurred or may not have occurred, after all this was an unconfirmed rumor, many years ago.

The salacious, as we all know salacious means smutty, dirty, nasty, titillating, rumor was that Trump as a private citizen, completely unrelated to his present position, peed on a Russian prostitute in Moscow, Russia.  In the annals of perversity how horrible is peeing on someone?  American clowns gather on a hotel balcony beer in one hand and dick in the other and pee on a crowd below while laughing uproariously. 

As a sign of contempt in concert with fellow conspirators some guy gets behind a victim and pees on his pantleg.  That’s a big joke of the practical kind where only the perps are laughing.  There must be numerous more examples in the annals of peeing.  For all I know the government may at some time have spent a quarter million dollars to commission a study on the subject.

Nevertheless, the assembled chiefs of the IC Community gathered to discuss what to do about this unconfirmed rumor.  The IC could possibly have leather bound volumes numbering a hundred or more of unconfirmed rumors.  Who runs major investigations of unconfirmed rumors?  Apparently no one but the assembled IC chiefs of which Comey of the FBI was one.

Probably giggling wildly the assembled Chiefs have to determine who is going to carry the news from Langley to the White House.  Perhaps they spun a bottle to determine who but in any event the lot fell to Comey of the FBI.

Whether Comey ever gave the Pres. the news of the unverified rumor or not isn’t clear.  Comey in his testimony gives no indication of what the rest of his conversation with the Pres. was about because the Pres. out of the blue struck him dumb by asking where his loyalty lay.  Why did the Pres. ask him that?

Is it possible that Comey of the FBI had just relayed this salacious but unverified rumor to the Pres.?  Wouldn’t this cast some doubt about Comey’s loyalty in the Pres.’ mind?  Would it be unusual to ask:  Why are you telling me this?  How important can an unverified rumor be?

Let us suppose, I don’t know how he obtained the rumor, some Trump hating journalist learned of this, had this unverified rumor published.  Wouldn’t the word of the assembled Chiefs of IC calling it nonsense be enough to discredit the journalist and quash the rumor?  I think so.  There must be something deeper going on here.  In my opinion the reputation of Comey of the FBI is destroyed, not Pres. Trump’s.