Monday, February 27, 2017


President Trump Vs. The New York Times

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The press continues to represent President Trump as a fool.  The New York Times, one of the most unbalanced of the President’s critics ran an article by Peter Baker titled ‘Will Trump Take Brutally Forthright Advice From General McMaster?’

The Times seems to think the President and McMaster are equals rather than superior and subordinate.  Trump is not only the Chief Executive of the US but he is also the Commander In Chief of the military.  That means he has a higher rank than any General or Admiral of the armed forces.  Each and everyone including McMaster, a Liberal plant, owes the President not only obedience but the respect due to a higher rank.

General McMaster does not speak brutally to his Commander In Chief.  Hopefully all his advice as a subordinate will be given in a forthright manner so as to leave no room for misunderstanding but respectfully.  If what Mr. Baker of the Times means by his title is whether President Trump could take in new information or a different representation of facts, I think the answer is a resounding ‘Yes.’

Consider that as a builder Mr. Trump had to rely on a number of specialists to construct his buildings who knew much more of their specialty than Mr. Trump did.   For instance, if Mr. Trump wanted a feature that was impossible it was the architect’s duty to say whether or not the request could be done and suggest an alternative if it couldn’t.  There is no reason to suppose the President would be less reasonable in dealing with General McMaster’s suggestions not based on alternative politics.

However, if, as the Times’ Mr. Baker suggests, McMaster disagrees with President Trump’s ideas on immigration that is outside the field of a military man’s competence and becomes a mere different political opinion.  I hope Mr. Baker can tolerate my own blunt disagreement with his own opinion.  However, as always the Times prints opinion pieces and calls them news.  Always the pieces are not only critical of the President but demeaning to him.

Mr. Baker goes on to quote a Max Boot of the CFR, obviously Mr. Baker considers him an ultimate authority:
The difficulty is that Trump has a lot of crazy ideas in his head- like we should steal Iraq’s oil or we should kill the relatives of terrorists or we will ban Muslims coming here.’
 
One asks Mr. Baker, crazy to whom?  The President did not say we should steal Iraq’s oil, he said we should have appropriated it after we had gone to the expense and trouble of ‘liberating’ the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussain.  In fact, as I recall, preparations were being made to build pipelines when that small part of the population that didn’t ‘love’ us, the US ardently believed that the Iraqi people loved America and Americans, erupted into guerilla warfare and not so guerilla as all that.  Another war gone wrong.

Was President Trump responsible for that, or were the Iraqi people crazy too?

As far as killing your enemy’s relatives, historically this is more or less de riguer while ISIS seems to practice it along with other medieval barbarities.  The logic being those seeking revenge are eliminated.  While I personally do not endorse the practice along with Mr. Baker does he mean to call Moslems crazy too?

That makes his third crazy idea difficult to grasp.  Mr. Boot of the CFR thinks President Trump is crazy for wanting to ban Muslims.  As various surveys point out a strong majority of Americans agree with the President and disagree with Mr. Boot of the CFR and Mr. Baker of the NYT.  Are they, or we rather, crazy too?

Mr. Baker approvingly says that Mr. McMaster ‘brutally’ disagrees with the President on this issue, which is beyond his competence.  This is strange, need I say very strange because Moslem paramilitaries, commonly referred to as terrorists by those of Baker and Boot stripe are a danger everywhere.  As paramilitaries these Moslems are busily at work in most countries of Europe and the US causing discord and civil strife.

For some inexplicable reason, Messrs. Baker, Boot and McMaster and Liberals in general refuse not only to acknowledge Moslem asymmetrical warfare but deny it and that makes them accomplices.  Not to be snide, but one wonders how much they are being subsidized to deny the reality.  Is the New York Times on the take?

Saturday, February 18, 2017

President Trump And The Press


President Trump And The Press

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Just recently I took my wife downtown for an eye exam.  While waiting I sat in a chair looking at a TV screen tuned to a national news channel.  The two heads, one female and one male were discussing the appearance of that Russian warship thirty miles off the East Coast in international water.  Bear in mind the ship was in international waters, free to any ship in the world.  In this day and age when ships are actual anachronisms from an earlier age, the ship was no threat to the United States, but the young woman was irate because the President wasn’t doing anything about it.  The President has no jurisdiction on the open seas.  There was nothing he could legally do about it.

The President earlier had said:  ‘I know what you want me to do, blow it out of the water.  I’m not going to do that.’  So much for the hysterical Liberal fear that if Trump was elected he was going to immediately get us into war.  Not that Obama hadn’t had us there for eight of his eight year term.

The President was right, even aggrieved that pressure was being placed on him to take extreme action.   In his place I would have invited the ship into New York harbor to give the sailors a little R&R.  Wouldn’t that be mature?  I know when I was a sailor that I would have liked that a lot.  Show the men a little of NYC.  Russian sailors would have been gaga.  Let them see the thousands of women and not a few men milling around wearing their pussies on their heads.  That would be something to talk about back home.  Then after a week of glorious shore leave I would have given them each a little bag of cookies, bigger for the Captain, and sent them on their way.

What with satellite  surveillance keeping watch from the sky what additional would there have been for them to see that couldn’t be seen except a bunch of looney rioters.

Heck, with satellites we can virtually be on the ship’s deck at sea and even listen in on their conversations.  Satellites! Wow!

It’s a new global world folks.

But then, as I sat watching this female head demanding the President do something about it, I realized that this dippy girl, fresh from some hothouse college like Vassar, no real experience in the real world, had no means to evaluate the situation.  Hell, in 1957 my little Destroyer Escort, 306 feet long, steel from stem to stern, with 180 men of steel aboard was sent alone through the Straits of Formosa.

At that time Taiwan and China were in a shooting war and our presence was supposed to terrorize the Chinese, keep them in their place.  Sure, no fear, but we did it.  Carefully staying in international waters twenty-five miles from shore we passed Quemoy and Matsu islands that were only a few miles from the shore, maybe fifteen miles from us and we could see the cannon blazing away from both sides.  These guys were at this all day long every day.  Nothing would have been easier than to blow us out of the water but apparently we had so terrorized them, not unlike the girl on TV, that they didn’t dare.  So, in a way as far as the Russian ship goes I’d been there and done that.

But, watching the dippy girl and equally dippy guy I realized that they and probably most of the press aren’t qualified for their jobs.  Nor can they be replaced by qualified people.  At least not that young.

Many of the press that torment the President are old enough but the women don’t have the requisite experience and the men probably evaded the maturing experience of the military by carrying those student deferments to the limit  signing up for grad school, post grad school and permanent school.

They don’t have a clue.  This President is just going to have to put up with them as though they are little kids, take them by the hand and lead them through the maze of politics.

Stay cool, don’t get frustrated, treat them like the applicants on your Apprentice reality TV show.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Trump At The Helm


Trump At The Helm

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Let’s first consider the powers of the presidency.  The powers are supposed to be limited by the Constitution however the legislature can vote full dictatorial powers to the President or he can assume the such power on his own by a willing and unobjecting legislature or he can do so on his own to protect the country.

At one time in 1932 President Herbert Hoover suggested that if the legislature gave him dictatorial power he would pull the country out of the Depression in no time.  The Democratically controlled Legislature refused him, however two years later in 1934 they did voluntarily grant Franklin Roosevelt dictatorial powers that he retained throughout his tenure.  Thus as with Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin,  Roosevelt made a quartet of dictators.  That he chose to use his powers discriminately changes nothing.  He was a dictator. 

Thus the Republicans and Truman pushed through the law that limited the President to two terms.  Presidents have kicked against the two term limit but it was not until Obama that the legislature allowed him to act as a virtual dictator voluntarily.  The two term law thus prevented Obama from becoming a life time dictator.

Hillary Clinton was his designated successor, through her he would have been able to rule until 2020 when hopefully Michelle would have been groomed so that he could rule through her.

This was all in accord with the wishes of the Council On Foreign Affairs.  Caught totally off guard the CFR found itself in the embarrassing position of having to deal with a totally unvetted outsider, Donald Trump.  Their plan then was to make it impossible for Trump to govern.  Thus the intelligence agencies refuse to give President Trump critical information because ‘they don’t trust him.’

The whole weight of the establishment has been dropped on the new president’s head. Trouble in front from the Left, trouble behind from the Republican establishment.  The President has advised us that everything that will be written about him will be fake news.  Yea, verily, I believe him.

What then is Trump to do?  Wait to be crushed and discarded?  He is the legally elected President.  I voted for him.  Is my vote and the rest of the country to be negated by a disappointed Left establishing their own dictatorship.  President Trump has no choice but to assume full dictatorial powers; they won’t be granted as with Roosevelt and they won’t then assumed as with Obama with the tacit consent of the legislature; President Trump will not unlike Napoleon have to crown himself; he will have to declare himself the emergency dictator for the welfare of the country.  We who elected Donald Trump do not want to see the crazy Liberals back in power.  We disposed of them; let them be gone.  The President will have to do it now, before he is ridden to the ground.  Senator McConnell has bleated that the Republicans have a 200 day plan for dealing with Obamacare.  That may possibly mean that they have a 200 day plan to dispose of President Trump, that is stage a coup.  Jump to it, President Trump, jump to it.  More than half the country will second you.

The President will then have to do what he didn’t want to do as the candidate, that is dispose of the troublemakers Democratic and Republican.  Give them twenty-four hours to leave North America , that is Canada, the US and Mexico or face more unpleasant consequences.  Exile them.  He has no choice.  Once the troublemakers are quelled then we can return to normalcy.

These are unquiet disturbed times which must be dealt with by quiet undisturbed minds.  Be on the right side of history- back President Trump.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

America's Rendezvous With Fate And Destiny


America’s Rendezvous With

Fate And Destiny

by

R.E. Prindle

 

America’s rendezvous with Fate and Destiny are upon us.  American history is roughly composed of four epochs: The first from Colonial times to the Civil War, the second the Gilded Age from the Civil War to the end of the Hoover Administration, the third from Franklin Delano Roosevelt to the end of Obama with the Fourth Epoch beginning with the Trump Administration.  The epochal transitions have been traumatic and this one bodes to be no less so.  The so-called democracy will end but hopefully the Republic will survive.

It takes a universe of tiny raindrops to form a great river so my little example here of the ending of the Third Epoch should be taken with the amusement that is its intent.  Time Magazine, perhaps one of the greatest symbols of the Third Epoch has fallen on hard times, the end is near.  Once the arbiter of America’ cultural affairs now its death rattle can be heard throughout the land.  

On February 11th, I received a solicitation from Time in the mail offering me a ‘Senior’s’ subscription.  They must have bought the mailing list from AARP.  The solicitation is a direct appeal to its last surviving constituency.  It offered me for 20.00 fifty-three weekly issues, an Ultronic Weather Station clock, to tick off my last days apparently, and an additional six month extension, all for twenty dollars.  That’s a money loser, the magazine has virtually no advertising so someone must be keeping the magazine alive.  When it goes it will be an epitaph for the epoch.

But what of the future?  What of America’s ultimate destiny?  Obama left office with the US in virtual ruins, his legacy I suppose, literally divided, fractured, in many ways.  Any sense of sanity has evaporated.  People march for the sake of marching using pink symbols of the female vulva on their heads, marches by voters demanding the voter’s rights they have just exercised.   Sure, they lost but there is no guarantee you’ve got a winner’s vote.

Even Obama who got used to the accoutrements of power is unhappy.  No longer able to take multi-million dollar vacations at the voter’s expense in Air Force One or helicopter rides here and there, he is essentially refusing to give up power setting up an alternate government in New York in the hopes of making Trump’s presidency a two year affair.  Yes, he’s giving Trump two years and out.  By constant political agitation he hopes to drive Trump from office in 1918, expecting a huge Congressional surge in 2018 toward the Democrats that he hopes to use to set aside the Constitutional Amendment limiting a President to two terms, clearing the way for his reelection in 2020.

Never very bright, Obama fails to see looming on the horizon a candidate of formidable ability- Jeff Bezos.  Bezos now the virtual arbiter of retail America with fingers deep into many aspects of commerce he has his eye set on the 2020 election for himself.  A couple years ago he bought the Washington Post newspaper.  Paid the asking price without a qualm.

The Post was losing money bigly.  One wondered what its use was intended to be.  Apparently to further Jeff’s political objectives.  Perhaps it gives him an incomparable listening post in the Capital.  He used his paper to defame now President Trump during the election.  One assumes that that will be its purpose during Trump’s administration as well as to build up his own candidacy.  He will have to unmask himself sometime in 2019 if that is his intent.

Just now he has taken full credit for thwarting the President’s  immigration order suspending entry from certain countries.  We hear that Amazon’s corporate legal staff prepared the whole objection giving it to the Ninth Circuit’s Seattle judge who declared the executive order unconstitutional.  I would think this places the Amazon Corporation in a difficult position.  Do its Articles of Incorporation include political activities?  Well, Bezos, an obvious genius, knows his business, one supposes.

Thus, at the commencement of the Fourth Epoch we have the Constitutional President, a disgruntled ex-president and a businessman of unexampled power in physical combat for the 2020 election.  Has anyone read of the same sort of contest in Roman history?

Of course other threats may unreel but to be an effective president Trump has to neutralize both Obama and Bezos.  He cannot effectively govern while defending himself from if not criminal, near criminal activities from them.

As regards Obama, I would just exile him; give him twenty-four hours to leave on his own or he would be put on a commercial flight back home to Kenya.  Probably his associates in crime should be exiled too.

As for Bezos, there are the anti-trust laws to break up his various enterprises under the Amazon umbrella.  That should keep him busy.  Amazon itself has violated something by interjecting themselves into governmental affairs.  That might also fall under anti-trust provisions.

The point being that the President cannot sit idly and allow these two men to operated openly against him. The so-called democracy is over.  Left with the Third Epoch.  Both Obama and Bezos are authoritarian personalities with extreme delusions of grandeur, Narcissism, acting as autocrats.  This cannot be allowed in the Republic.  The institution of exile must be revived to deal with this dangerous situation.

The President is the President, he must do what he must to protect the country from enemies from without and more importantly within.  Obama and Bezos could drive the country to civil war and no one wants that.  An ounce of prevention…  It is the President’s Constitutional duty to remedy.  There would be no violation of law.  Exile is certainly within his options.

Act now, quickly and firmly deal with revolutionary dissidents as a president must.

Saturday, February 11, 2017


Time Must Have A Stop

by

R.E. Prindle

 

President Trump is really changing our lives.  I’m doing all kinds of things I haven’t done for years.  I bought a copy of the National Review with a cover story about President Trump and that sour grape Obama.  Now, after forty years on I actually bought a copy of Time Magazine because the cover story promotes a revolution against the President.  ‘The Resistance Rises (in pink, indicating a female resistance).  How  A March Becomes A Movement.  The picture portrays the pink bonnet of the revolting ladies.  A symbol of the vulva makes the front cover of Time.  Pornography in disguise.  The whole issue of only 60 pages drums up a revolution. 

Sixty pages, and Time calls that a magazine.  I remember when they were thick, a hundred twenty pages or more,  maybe two hundred, with a hundred pages of prime advertising.  This pitiful thing has ads from Kelloggs and Chevy and a bunch of medical stuff, White guy with hepatitis.

Time-Life used to be the life blood of intellectual America then they were merged with Warner Bros. of Hollywood and it was all downhill from there.  The mag was founded about 1923  by Henry Luce and others and quickly became a success, then they bought the Life name for mega bucks from its publisher.  The first Life was a humor magazine of the early century that fell on hard times when the country lost its sense of humor, hasn’t found it yet.

Founded in New York City, Time posed as a conservative mag.  But as NYC was 25% Jewish and another 25% Communist or left leaning the staff reflected the demographics of the city which meant it was boring from within staffed mainly with Reds.  Henry Luce married Clare Booth which made her the famous Clare Booth Luce.  She had been an NYC party girl of liberated morals.  At one time the mistress of the notorious Bernard Baruch, the advisor of presidents.  She never lost her attachment after marrying Henry.  She even bought a house next door to Bernie, presumably so she wouldn’t have to walk too far. 

That was in the early forties at the same time Whittaker Chambers began his rise to editorship of the mag.  While hiring a notorious Communist like Chambers may have seemed a folly to more balanced minds, Chambers claimed he had renounced Communism a few months before assuming the job.

Possibly, but isn’t that a Communist ploy to insinuate operatives inside the Capitalist horse so they can bore from within?  Sometime later infamous Red, Max Eastman, who also supposedly saw the light, rose to prominence at Reader’s Digest.  After having thought and lived as Communists for decades did they suddenly learn to think like seasoned Capitalists?  Does anyone believe that?  Send 9.99 and a stamped return envelope  and I’ll return a deed to the Brooklyn Bridge.  I said ‘a’ deed not ‘the’ deed.  Read the fine print.

Whittaker Chambers made big money at Time through the forties until he suddenly quit his lucrative job for a non-lucrative job exposing Communists in government.  Exposing Communists is OK but proving it is another thing.  How many dedicated conservatives made themselves look like fools chasing Reds?  Is it possible that Whittaker was maybe a lure to destroy the Right?  If Alger Hiss hadn’t lied Nixon would never have redeemed his name, and to this day there are people to defend Hiss even though subsequent information has proven that he not only lied but was a Communist agent of the deepest dye.  My thought is that while Chambers may have turned in his card did he ever sever his loyalty to the Party?

So, with all of the Time-Life publications there was a Red tinge to them.  Kind of like when you feel like throwing up but never do.

We all read Time, I began shortly after graduation from high school after I joined the Navy.  At home the closest we got to intellectual matters was a subscription to the National Geographic.  I was a fairly avid reader then from 1957 to 1965 when I realized that the mag was not only pink underneath but totally dishonest.  Many of their news stories, maybe all for what anyone knows,  were total fiction.  What spurred me to leave was Time’s reporting of Howard Hughes departure from Las Vegas. The guy, or woman, who wrote the ‘eye witness’ report wasn’t even there and it didn’t happen as it was reported.

During the period I was reading the magazine though, Time-Life was instrumental in creating the culture of the early Sixties.  The two magazines made the art scene of New York.  That’s where they published.  While billed as a national magazine it was essentially New York in its outlook not much different from the New Yorker in that respect.   Andy Warhol might have lived and died a cypher without the fabulous exposure, or advertising if you will, of Time-Life.  Life even put Ed Sanders of the Fugs on their cover.  How’s that for diving deep into the barrel?  Life even gave a photo essay to Edie Sedgwick, one of Warhol’s drama queens.  Unknown beyond the Hudson but making the scene in New York City.

And Now, Vol. 189 #4, 2017 this pitiful relic fighting for its life attempts to make an exhibition of snit a movement.  Given that the mag was fiction in 1965 what is its coverage of the President likely to be?

I’ll let you know as soon as I read a couple articles.  I’ve already looked over the Chevy and Kellogg’s ads.  Never bought either and now I never will. Boycott everything that smells of the other half.  A pity though that after a hundred years it is a small distance from now until Time must have a stop.

A Review: The National Enquirer- Impeach Trump


A Review:  The National Enquirer-

Impeach Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

American politics have been shattered by the election of the new direction candidate Donald Trump.  The hateful hysterical reaction of the Left is unparalleled.  Although many tempests and hate campaigns have disfigured many elections- one thinks of Hoover’s presidency, Roosevelts long years in office, the unpopularity of Truman, the hate campaign against Johnson, and the actual  driving from office of Nixon they are nothing compared to the seething campaign of hatred against President Trump.

The President himself seems to have prepared himself for it and indeed is giving back everything he is getting.  One wonder how one can top grandmothers and mothers embarrassing their sons by parading the streets in caps symbolic of their vulvas but there they are.  I shudder to think of my meres  wearing their vulvas on their heads in private, no less than in public.  Thankfully I was spared  such distress by their both having parting ways with the living.  Good decision on their part.

The press also has gone to pieces not flinching from publishing defamatory pieces in an orgy of licentiousness along with much fake news.  This elicited the protestations from the President to pay no attention to any MSM news about him because it was fake.  Misinformation, disinformation, directed information or what have you, but fake.  I well believe it.

With all this fake news where is one to turn.  Standing in line at the grocery store the cover story on the originator, so to speak, of fake news, The National Enquirer, caught my attention.  I’d already passed over all the Oprah titles.  The Enquirer was coming to the President’s defense.  

OBAMA’S SECRET PLOT TO IMPEACH TRUMP the headline shrieked.  In a little medallion to the right:  Constitutional Crisis Explodes.

And then two bullets:  EXPOSED: Plan to SABOTAGE Muslim ban & dramatic executive orders.

REVEALED:  How Donald WILL FOIL TREASONOUS power grab.’

I have to confess I was seeing those headlines unfolding in the daily news so I could hardly resist buying the mag for the inside story.  Sometimes, you  know, the Enquirer is right on.  Was it all stuff and nonsense as I expected?  Well, no.  The story seems to mesh with what I was seeing and hearing.

NEWS, the article proclaimed:  Obama is behind the scenes attempting to sabotage Trump’s presidency.  Well, that was obvious.  The President had no sooner taken office than Obama and Clinton published a picture with the caption:  Miss us yet?  Quite clearly Obama was missing Air Force One and those wonderful helicopter rides with a bunch of White boys standing to attention and saluting him.  Enough to turn anyone’s head, especially a boy working the streets of Chicago as a community organizer.  What an elevation.

Then the headline in one inch letters:  Obama’s Back Room Plot To Impeach Trump.

That wasn’t too hard to believe as thousands of disgruntled Liberals were rioting while shouting the same thing.  Apparently they thought it was enough of a crime that all we Deplorable knuckledraggers elected Trump.

The snappy leading phrase of the article is enough to open anyone’s eyes wide, wide, wide.  This followed:  Treasonous puppet master Barack Obama is pulling the strings on a coordinated conspiracy across multiple agencies to sabotage the Trump administration.  That’s not too hard to believe, obvious even, what with four top State Department officials resigning just after the President took office.

The whole plot is apparently going to hinge on the 25th Amendment to the Constitution.  I didn’t know there were twenty-five.  I thought it was fake,  National Enquirer and all, but it wasn’t, it exists and a lot of people were logging on to the site.

The Amendment is basically a formula for unseating a sitting president without going to the trouble of impeaching.  All you need is a conspiracy within the Cabinet and other key officials to say the President is incapable of filling the office.  Sort of an elite recall provision.  I wonder who thought that one up and why.

Such a thing is unlikely to happen in the first two years and if the Republicans returned a larger majority in the two houses in 2018 it might be impossible.

At any rate supposing the Obama coup succeeds, according to the article, Obama and his henchmen would reverse the Constitutional amendment limiting a president to two terms allowing him to be elected in 2020.  Seems a little fanciful but stranger things have happened however without a Democratic majority in both houses I don’t think it would be possible.

The mid-term elections may be crucial.

But, imagine, the only intelligent news happening, real news, is coming from the National Enquirer  while he MSM is generating fake news.  Oh well, the Enquirer bills itself as:  The only publication with guts to tell it like it is.   That may be true standing the media world on its head.

Monday, February 6, 2017

The Rise Of The Conservative Ideology Pt. II


The Rise Of The Conservative Ideology Pt. II

by

R.E. Prindle

 

A continuation of the quote from Joslin in Part I

 

The incontrovertible fact is that never before in the history of our country has a more thoroughly organized , definite campaign been inaugurated  by any political agency against the person of the President of the United States, whoever he happened to be, than the “Smear Hoover” campaign.  Backed by the expenditure of great sums of money, its sponsors persistently and consistently pursued the purposes of embarrassing, distorting, and misrepresenting Mr. Hoover so he would be destroyed politically.

The whole strategy was organized on the premise that if Mr. Hoover could be discredited before the public, the Democratic party would win the 1932 election.  Notwithstanding that the Democratic National Committee had a large deficit, it disbursed vast amounts of money provided by Chairman Raskob personally and through his banking friends in New York to defame Mr. Hoover and thus regain control of the Federal Government.  It succeeded in each purpose.

Mr. Michelson, who wielded a trenchant pen and had a keen understanding of politics, was placed in charge of the so-called Educational Bureau of the committee.  Every act of Mr. Hoover, great or small, was made the object of attack.  Through his term, literally thousands of press releases, communications, speeches, [tweets} etc. were made public.  Each and every one was derogatory of the President and his works.  The retrospective examination of them would require volumes.

The above quote is from Joslin’s Hoover Off The Record as begun in Part I.

Hoover was in the unfortunate position that he had to be destroyed, humiliated and deemed an absolute failure so that the Democrats’ Man On A White Horse, FDR, could be elected.  If Hoover had been allowed to succeed as he was on the way of doing then it would have been a long, long time before the Dems could regain the presidency.

The Dems then pulled out all the stops and waged a campaign of total defamation as Joslin says.  The same is true today with President Trump.  His successes  will be labeled failures and any failures will be depicted as catastrophes.  If he succeeds it is over for the Dems for the foreseeable future so they must sabotage anything he does.  They will.  Attack whatever they say as they will attack whatever we say.

Their propaganda will be of defamation of the President and defamation of anyone who openly supports him including physical violence.  Intimidation.  They are an amoral lot playing Machiavellian politics.  Brady and Billichick have been defamed for even speaking to the President.  These people are vicious.  Constant support and counter-defamation is necessary to counter this.  Stop trying to argue rationally with the Dems.  Scorn them, within accepted forms and limitations so that one appears  virtuous, but show no mercy and never spare them.

Boycotts are a weapon both sides will use.  Pick our targets and boycott them.  Boycott Hollywood.  Never go to the theatre, their main source of income, the crap is going to show up on TV anyway.  Get yourself a subscription service like Netflix if you must watch the crap, but non-attendance at theatres will bring Hollywood crashing to the ground.  See what Streep and Cooney shout then. 

Boycott SNL.  Destroy their ratings.  Let them preach to the choir.  Who cares.  Don’t even mention them.  That is easy to do with only a modicum of self-control.

This is a fight to the finish.  Are we not men or women?  What is impossible to us?  Nothing.  The war on Hoover shows how the Dems operate.  There will be no surprises.  It will be the same with President Trump.  Go for the jugular, show no mercy, and cast them down.

Sunday, February 5, 2017

The Rise Of The Conservative Ideology


The Rise Of The Conservative Ideology

by

R.E. Prindle

Battle lines are being drawn:  Stop children, what's that sound' 

A voice from the past:  Things never change. This was the Stop Hoover movement of Roosevelt and the Democrats.

The “SMEAR HOOVER” CAMPAIGN was launched as the President urged unity of effort, he never got, to combat the depression.  The opposition made forays upon him under the guidance of Democratic leaders and through the writing of Charles Michelson, a skilled publicist who was recruited from the New York World by the chairman of the Democratic National Committee.  Mr. Michelson’s services were retained to do a particular job.  He discharged that duty.  It marked the beginning of almost ceaseless criticism of Mr. Hoover, personally as well as officially, that persisted throughout his term.  It hampered the President’s work.  It made him resentful.  He regarded some of it as unpatriotic.
I deplore the necessity of referring to the subject.  I do so only because, unhappily, it is an integral part of any account of the Administration.  The activity launched against the President influenced congressional action and public reaction at a critical time when cooperation was a vital necessity.  Any President must have the confidence of the body of the people if he is to succeed inn his tasks.  The extent to which that confidence is undermined gives the direct ratio of the limitation of his activities.


Hoover Off The Record, Theodore G. Joslin, Secretary to the President, 1931 to 1933, p.34.

 The above quote amply demonstrates the conditions under which President Trump is and undoubtedly will have to function during his terms.  It matters little how successful he may be, indeed, any such success will merely enrage demented Liberals.

The times have changed, this is no longer 1933,  and we are now in a global situation in which borders are dissolving.  In the near future, excluding any retrograde countries such as Korea and China, people will be united by global ideologies rather than country borders.  This will necessitate a change in consciousness and quickly.  I call on those of the Conservative ideology to join ranks with our fellows in Russia, Poland, Germany, France and the Globe to challenge and defeat the Liberal fantasy.

Support Marine Pen in France, Putin in Russia and other leaders of the ideology around the world.  Tolerate no negative propaganda.  Extend freedom around the world while defeating the Orwellian Liberal Autocracy.

Friday, February 3, 2017

The Lunacy Of Our Political Situation


The Lunacy Of Our Political Situation

by

R.E. Prindle

 

For anyone who expected differently our political situation should be clarifying.  It is clear that President Trump has aborted the Post ’45 Liberal Agenda.  His approach follows a different narrative.  Always fanatical the Liberal reaction has intensified.  Like all reactionaries they wish to destroy the new order.

The street reactionaries are obvious but while noisy they should be able to be subverted and cauterized.  The only question is how quickly the President can build up his own street organization.  Yes, this gets more reminiscent of Weimar Germany.  More important is the resistance embedded in governmental departments.

They have been staffed and led by members of the Council On Foreign Affairs for decades.  As such they are committed to the ideology of the Post ’45 agenda that President Trump’s ideology cuts across.  It should come as no surprise that all his appointments have come from outside the CFR framework.  It should also come as no surprise that four leading members of the State Department quit in an attempt to sabotage the President’s administration.  Undoubtedly more key civil servants will depart in the attempt to paralyze that administration.  If one checks they will probably be CFR or connected to it.

Most people probably are unaware of the what and who the CFR is.  The CFR arose out of the wreckage of the League of Nations fight.  Having lost that battle the CFR was established in 1921 to gain control of the electoral process.  Every candidate for president beginning in 1924 has been vetted to conform with CFR ideology.  After ’45, of course, it became the political agenda until the President’s election.

Today, you can read the CFR magazine, Foreign Affairs, for the official line.  On the internet you can call up a list or a partial list of the CFR membership.  Not only have all the presidents been CFR vetted but a very large proportion of key governmental post have been filled by CFR members.  Johnson’s administration was the high point at 57%

Thus, President Trump who is the first elected president since 1921 who is not CFR has to free himself from CFR sabotage.  It was a gift to him when those four key State Department employees quit.

As a quick read to verify this account I recommend Curtis B. Dall’s F.D.R. My Exploited Father-In-Law:  An Intimate Account Of The Man, The Regime, And The Legacy.  Dall was a close eye witness to these early proceedings from 1921 to 1941.  As a member of the Wall Street fraternity he was also privy from that side as well as Roosevelt’s.

The Trump administration is going to be a battle for the soul of America, so bone up.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

When Is A Religion Not A Religion?


When Is A Religion Not A Religion?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The key issue of the Trump Administration is what to do about the Moslems.  This is a very problematic issue fraught with deep and divisive difficulties.  It hits at the heart of the Ellis Island Syndrome- immigration in America.  It transcends reason to brush against an ingrained religious conviction.

The bulk of the US population is impervious to reason and unwilling to listen to argument concerning the issue.  For instance in a recent photograph taken at Dallas/Fort Worth where the airport’s Director offered Moslems sanctuary in the wake of President Trump’s ban on people from seven Moslem countries, the Moslems immediately formed an impromptu demonstration.  The Director is a kind hearted but foolish man.  Among Moslems a man held aloft a sign that read:  Tolerance is an American virtue, or words to that effect.

While it may be true that Americans pride themselves on a foolish tolerance it is also true that Moslemism is a determinedly intolerant religion.  It will accept no  other religion or ideology.  They are gaming the system.  It’s goal is to impose its legal system as the only legal system worldwide, globally.  This includes the United States.

Americans apparently cannot grasp this simple fact.  The Moslems will accept no other result than that the entire world is converted to Moslemism and sharia law.  If one cannot accept that fact then one must choose between conversion or subordination.  There can be no compromise.  I would bring up the whole of their history but that would be to no avail.  It’s been done with no results.

Perhaps, in an effort to get a wedge in President Trump has banned the citizens from seven Moslem countries entry into the United States.  It doesn’t matter which countries the effect would be the same.

A hue and cry was immediately raised that such a ban violated the Constitutional protection of freedom of religion.  Once again this may be an American ideal but the Moslem ideal is complete rejection of freedom of religion.  For those slow on the pickup if Moslemism triumphed there would be no freedom of religion and no Constitution.  Heck, during the Obama Administration the Left argued that the Constitution was obsolete.  So, why are they arguing it’s valid now?

President Trump tried to soften the ban by claiming that the ban was political and not religious.  But, Islam is a theocracy.   There is no separation of religion and State; politics and religion are the same.  The head of ISIS is a political and religious figure, the Caliph, hence the Caliphate.

We are in the midst of a religious war to end all religious wars, a war without compromise, no prisoners taken.

The problem is to convince those US citizens who think immigration is a civic virtue.  That it is not.  Dozens of good arguments have been produced to show the negative effects of allowing unrestricted, unlimited immigration but it is to no avail unless US citizens can be taught and made to believe the nature of immigration.  There is no virtue in sacrificing your own people and civilization for the benefit of others.

While Trump defends his actions against the seven Moslem theocracies as political that is evading the facts.  Perhaps he knows better and is trying to whiff a fast curve by slow witted voters who will look back at the catcher and ask:  How’d you get the ball?

It can’t help but be a religious issue and the President is justified as promulgating it as one.

If Moslems pretend to be tolerant of other religions they know full well they are lying but their religion permits it against infidels.  If you as an American haven’t learned that you are an infidel then let me give it to straight from the shoulder: You are an infidel and don’t count in the eyes of Allah.

So start acting like an infidel and join the Crusade.

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

It's A Voter's Question


It’s A Voter’s Question

by

R.E. Prindle

It’s a voter’s question

Is he in or is he out.

 

While this election has been volatile it is probably not more volatile that many previous elections.  Elections are contentious.  Charges of vote manipulation form part of the fabric of American politics.  It has not been a rare occurrence.  Cries of conspiracy went up by conspiracy theorists of the Left, who decry conspiracy theorists of the Right as absurd. 

The Right is laughing at the Left for their claims that Trump was elected  through interference by the Russian Putin.  When you need a devil there’s always one around.  Lacking any evidence the Left professes the notion that Putin put fake news sites on the internet and used paid trolls to disrupt Leftwing sites.  But, of course, they fail to notice that the Right detected Left wing trolls in profusion.

As we all know Trump overwhelmingly won the electoral college and while when we went to bed on election night he led in the popular vote by a million, when we woke up in the morning Hillary was a couple million ahead by the votes of one State, the secessionist State of California.  Ultimately California’s vote is claimed to have swung the popular vote by four and one half million.  Some found it hard to believe.

Trumpists not to be outdone in any conspiracy theory darkly countered that the Dems had stuffed the ballot boxes pointing out the interference of Mexican consuls and messages emanating for the presidential office of Mexico.  Undaunted the Left whose own conspiracy theory charges lacked credibility charged that that of the Trumpists lacked credibility.  One might call this a Mexican standoff.

Oh yes,the Mexicans.  Leftists who seem to operate best from a tabula rasa managed to wipe the slate clean of all circumstances before the election; not only didn’t they happen, they say, but the whole previous year and a half didn’t happen except for their version of Trump’ malefactions.

So the Mexican consuls attempts to steer the Mexican vote to Hillary didn’t happen except on the record.  The flooding of Mexicans immigrants into California by Obama’s refusal to enforce the border didn’t happen.  The frantic effort to enfranchise the Mexican and immigrant vote didn’t happen.  Indeed, the preponderant Mexican population from the San Diego border up to and including Los Angeles apparently doesn’t exist.  Nor the Las Vegas Mexican population which was also essentially extending California borders around Vegas, as it were.

As ex-president Obama, still referred to as President Obama by the left in defiance of election laws who deny the reality of the ballot also, once said, an election cannot be rigged and he’s from Chicago where every Chicagoan knows better.  Certainly Mexican California would never stuff ballot boxes anywhere except in their native Mexico.

So, the Liberals continue to howl that despite California with a sufficiency of balloteers but an insufficiency of electoral votes had the election stolen.  While they profess to despise conspiracy theory they have created a whopper of their own.

Now, Californians who are very happy that their size, one out eight Americans live in the State, are even more disgruntled than the Left in general.  Governor Moonbeam Brown is so displeased by the failure of the rest of the country to bow to the 12% that he is leading a secessionist movement adding the name ‘Secesh’ between Moonbeam and Brown.

Perhaps ‘Secesh’ doesn’t realize that secession would guarantee Mexican success in recapturing California for Mexico.  The next governor is certainly going to be Mexican, the legislature is or will be under the control of Mexicans and their White confederates, so, that if secession were a fact or pending it would be a simple matter to join Alto-California with Baja-California and become a new Mexican State.  All done without firing a shot.  Pretty nifty should it happen.

It is not that the Dems didn’t try to secure a preponderant voter base by flooding the country with immigrants while carrying the banners ‘immigrants are human too, no human is illegal etc’., tried to get as many inducted to US citizenship as quickly as possible but as English wasn’t a required qualification they couldn’t find enough translators for the 98 odd languages to get them printed on the ballots.

This too might be called a conspiracy.

So, just as Moonbeam ‘Secesh’ Brown is throwing a hissy fit in California someone or some NGOs are whipping people into the streets to protest their loss.  The majority of them are women, grannies too, who hit the streets wearing pink bonnets with cat ears on them to represent their procreational gear commonly referred to as pussies.

Some daring, or desperate, types devised full length costumes looking just like a real live vulva.  This was, presumably, to make grabbing their pussy easier.  Even grannies get hot sometime.  One didn’t need dead aim at something that size.  Just kind of spray in the general direction.

Where it will end isn’t clear at this point.  Loud are the cries to sabotage Trump’s presidency, obstruct as only Dems can obstruct far surpassing the obstruction of the Republicans that the Dems so roundly condemned as evil.  There are even howls to assassinate the President.

Liberals are not nice people.