Kim Davis, Cakes and Licenses

 

Kim Davis, Cakes And Licenses

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Kim Davis is in the news again.  The homosexuals refuse to desist from plaguing her.  The issue here is not marriage licenses; the issue is psychotic homosexuals forcing heterosexuals to do their will.  As their psychosis is compulsive they want to force compulsion on others.

 

As with the filthy cake decorations they want to compel bakers to make against their will there are other available venues open to them.  Faggot cakes with the most offensive decorations have been baked for decades by bakers specializing in pornography.  This is America; if there is a demand the need will be filled.  Homos have been able to buy and can today buy those cakes without any difficulty.  They know this but their psychosis is such that they wish to force others  to act against their will.

 

So with marriage licenses.  There is no trouble finding an office that will issue them.  However they don't want licenses unless they are creating a fuss and getting attention.  They are sick people.  Psychologists had so classed them but several years ago at a psychological convention homosexuals threatened the psychologists with bodily harm unless they retracted their evaluation.

 

The courts support the homosexual side against all justice.  As in Kim Davis' case they punish heterosexuals when there is no need to.  All they are doing is gratifying the homosexual ego.  Why would they?  Because they are either homosexuals hence having a conflict of interest or they are being threatened with harm if they don't.  Nobody could be so stupid as these judges or willing to violate the Constitution, law and equity to the extent they do.

 

As I say, homos can get cake and licenses without any difficulty.  Shouldn't the judges of these courts be examining their claims more objectively?  Why aren't they?

 



 



Are The Democrats Monolithic?

 Are The Democrats Monolithic?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

It seems that in the splintering of Americans by Obama he has induced a real us and them situation:  either you are a Democrat and good or a Republican and therefore a domestic terrorist.  Let not our minds be beguiled by such nonsense.  When polls show that eighty percent or so of we the public strongly oppose unlimited immigration that eighty percent isn’t all Republican.  Fully half of the Democratic votes must resent the constant inflow of what are really hostile invaders.

So on the issue of homosexuality.  While it appears that both the Democratic and Republican leaders are homosexual or, at least, leaning hard to the fey side the rank and file, as Democratic leaders condescend to term us, are not.  I suspect that at least half object to their own sons and daughters being taught in school to revere faggotry with the hope that they will take up the practice.

Nor does this belief in homosexuality extend to the Negro voter either.  Loud have been Negro protests to the faggotry of government leaders.  The homosexual Supreme Court is attempting to sneak homosexual benefits into the Constitution by a very questionable, even erroneous, interpretation of that document.

Violating the rights of all straight and honest people they have taken to jailing those of us, you may be next, who refuse to submit to their arbitrary ruling.  Since when is it a crime to refuse to bake a cake for someone on any grounds period, much less with offensive genital homosexual decorations?

The members of the Supreme Court are more than asses, they’re fools.

I suspect then that the Democrats and various racial peoples are very divided on the issue of placing an erect phallus in the middle of a cake topping.  And that is what we are talking about, don’t kid yourself.  I have only contempt for the members of the Supreme Court and the judge who imprisoned Kim Davis denying her the freedom of conscience guaranteed by that Constitution.  And that goes for the judge who sentenced Kim.   If he isn’t queer I suppose his sons and daughters are otherwise why is he so sympathetic to fruits.

The intent of this little polemic is that Trump should get his head straight and take advantage of Democratic gaffes such as the Davis case drawing legions of Democratic, Negro, Mexican, and other voting groups, possibly even a large number of homosexuals who have to be revolted by the antics of some of their dizzy members to vote for him.   These groups are not monolithic.  Divide and win the vote.

Get with it Donald.  You’re right about immigration now broaden your field.  Go after all voters not just us ‘domestic terrorists.’  You’re going to have to buck, that was Buck, your homosexual leaders and don’t worry about your oath.  You don’t have to honor it any more than Boehner and the other Repub homosexuals have honored their promises to we voters.  What was that about repealing Obamacare?

Hell, Don, it’s just politics.

Donald Trump: Good News And Bad

Donald Trump:  Good News And Bad

by

R.E. Prindle

 

There is much good news for Donald Trump.  Polls show him beating whatever candidate the Demos have to offer including Hillary 45% to 40%.  The Democratic Party platform is soundly rejected at this time.  However Donald has disappointed us on a very important matter.

The courageous clerk Kim Davis has become a political prisoner for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses in Kentucky.  We all owe more than a debt of gratitude to her for her courage.  Donald when questioned about it offered her no defense merely stating that same-sex marriage is the law of the land.  It is not the law of the land while Trump should have said Davis’ imprisonment was a travesty of justice and when elected he would issue an executive order unmaking the Supreme Court’s decision.

Secondly there is no Federal law making same-sex marriage legal.  There is only an opinion of the Supreme Court saying that they don’t believe such marriage is forbidden by the Constitution but they have no means of effecting their opinion while there are many astute Constitutional minds that can find no authorization for the Court’s opinion.  I repeat, it is only the Court’s opinion and not a law; the Court is forbidden to legislate as is the executive.

One should never confuse THE LAW with a law as Donald apparently has.  THE LAW is necessary for an orderly society while laws themselves can be passed as hysterical reactions to some matter and ought not to be taken seriously.  They will not be an offence to THE LAW.  Likewise stupid men and women can pass stupid laws such as the current hate laws that illegally impose social disabilities on heterosexual White men making them second class citizens.

There is a law of the land, Donald, that you should promise to repeal on election.  In a Democracy such as ours there cannot be legislation making a portion of the population second class citizens.

Look to your constituency Donald Trump.  Victory may be in you grasp if the Fey Republicans who forced you to sign a non-competition agreement don’t steal the election from you.  Great negotiating, Don.  Look out China.

You are the Republican Party and woe to the Fey Republicans if they force you out.

Look to your constituency as in the Davis case.  It was your chance to capture half the Democratic vote and you blew it.