Does Trump Miss The
Point
On Tech Visas?
by
R.E. Prindle
There are
apparently many jobs Americans won’t do.
One is obviously the very high paying job of CEO of IT companies which
seem to be headed by Hindus. While
Americans were quite capable of inventing computers, the internet and all the
IT accoutrements they are incapable of managing that which they have
invented. At least until recently. The personnel of talent now come from outside
the US which is incapable of producing anything other than dummies, at least of
the male variety. Sometime in the recent
past White males lost the ability to function but fortunately women and people
of color are here to pick up the slack.
The country
of choice for choosing the CEOs seems to be India. The Hindu mind that produced virtually
nothing for the last three thousand years or so seems to be ideally suited to
the computer sciences. So much so that
Americans adequately performing tech jobs are now being fired, one presumes for
incompetence to be replaced by Hindus or others who have surpassed White people
in intelligence while in many cases according to Jason Riley are even paid more
than the American morons they replace thus actually raising costs to their
companies. One marvels that such super
intellects have been hiding in India unused lo these many millennia. It took American genius to discover them in
their lairs, give them a shave and new suit of clothes and get them on the job.
Mr. Riley
writing in the venerable Wall Street Journal (8/17/16) gives us his thoughts in
a piece he titles: Trump Misses the
Point on Tech Visas. Obviously the
President of the United States may be one of those jobs Americans won’t do
along with picking grapes and basic construction. Indeed, our current Negro president was
chosen because his skin isn’t White.
While most Americans believe he has done a poor job, his signature
legislation Obamacare is heading toward bankruptcy, the people in charge are convinced he has
been the greatest president ever.
Perspective is obviously involved.
Mr. Riley
who is a senior fellow at something called Manhattan Institute is also a WSJ contributor. Those should be stellar credentials but Mr.
Riley, perhaps a little too senior, is difficult to follow.
In
yesterday’s times these H1B immigrants would have been called wage busters or
scabs. While there are several instances
of importing these workers to displace an already existing work force Mr. Riley
chose for his illustration the Disney Co. of Orlando. Disney World is appropriately a fantasy
world.
Choosing his
words carefully Mr. Riley says that 250 American Disney tech workers were ‘furloughed’
to be replaced by 250 H1B workers while Mr. Riley doesn’t say from where a good
guess would be that they are Hindus from India.
Now, the word furlough means a leave of absence, applied especially to
the military. Those 250 American workers
were not furloughed, they were fired.
They aren’t coming back while they were compelled to train their
replacements. Mr. Riley glosses over this
truth to avoid the obvious. The ability
to do this is why he works for a ‘think tank.’
He explains
further making even less sense:
Something called the National Foundation for American Policy released a
study, by whom and of what quality isn’t mentioned, but according to the study
“Companies are not replacing long time employees with new workers doing the
exact same jobs but rather replacing the employees with new systems in an
attempt to perform the function in a more efficient way.’ In other words, these Hindus are far superior
workers than the Americans.
Let us hope
for Disney’s sake the attempt is successful.
We are not informed who devised the new more efficient systems, one
would be surprised they could have been inefficient Americans, whether from
domestic or ‘outsourced’ sources but what is clear is that 250 Hindus replaced
250 American workers who apparently were too stupid to be retrained to the new
more efficient system.
What is
interesting here is that Disney accepted 250 employees sight unseen. They did not vett them themselves. Mr. Riley explains:
In reality [interesting word to use in the Disney fantasyland] hiring a contractor is often done through a competitive bidding process and the company doesn’t know beforehand whether or to what extent the winning bid will use H1B visa holders.
Competitive
bidding? Mr. Riley doesn’t say on what
basis the competition was defined but in business it is usually for the lowest
possible price. The only reasonable
conclusion is that in the bidding by various agencies it is to provide 250
qualified workers who will accept the lowest possible wage. But no, Mr. Riley say this is an unreasonable
assumption.
US employers turn to high-skill immigrants for the same reason they turn to low skill immigrants… [that is the lowest possible wage] out of necessity. Foreign nationals who tend [they tend?] to be either more skilled or less skilled than the typical US worker.
So
essentially Disney is getting a pig in a poke; 250 workers who may be more
skilled or less skilled than the workers they are replacing, hence no gain in
efficiency under any system, new or old.
But they are replacing ‘typical’ American workers. (Perhaps at this point one can see Donald
Trump scratching his head because he probably doesn’t understand.) ‘Typical’ seems confusing in any case. Obviously American universities have found
Americans too stupid to teach because more than 70% of full time graduate
students in electrical engineering and computer sciences of American
universities are international students says Mr. Riley. Over the past three decades, college-degree
holders outside the US have more than doubled while the US share of those with
college degrees has declined by 30%. Has
anyone asked why American college degree holders have declined? It would seem something to look into, don’t
you think? It would seem that
something is going on. Discrimination?
I have
trouble making any sense of Mr. Riley’s article and I’m not sure Mr. Riley is
able to either. Certainly while Mr.
Riley claims that Trump misses the point on tech visas nowhere in his article
does he show reasons of Trump’s ignorance.
After reading this article I doubt if Mr. Trump is any more enlightened.
The Wall
Street Journal should be ashamed to print such incompetent articles as Mr.
Riley’s. Of course Mr. Riley is an
inefficient American brain worker who should, perhaps be replaced by a foreign
worker using a new more efficient system.
I’m still
voting Trump who, by my standards, has a better grasp on the nature of the
problem’s facing us.
No comments:
Post a Comment