The Birth Of Two
Nations
by
R.E. Prindle
In 1915 D.W.
Griffith and Thomas Dixon Jr. released what is perhaps the most famous movie,
silent or talkie, ever made. The movie
that depicts the aftermath of the Civil War, that is Reconstruction, was the
biggest spectacle ever produced to that time, and also the highest
grosser.
The movie
was addressed to the North. For the
North the Civil War was a war of extermination intended to kill all the White
Southerners. That they didn’t succeed is
a mere accident of history. For
instance, read War Crimes Against Southern Civilians by Walter Brian
Cisco. After a hundred and fifty years
later Southerners finally feel free to tell the truth. The book will help you understand Griffith’s
Birth of a Nation.
Thus the
nation Griffith and Dixon referred to was the unity of the Aryan Nation. The Birth was its hoped for reunification
after the horrors of the Civil War. The
plea was never to kill each other again; especially avoiding the genocidal
horrors of Generals William Tecumseh Sherman and Phil Sheridan among many other
Northern commanders.
Naturally
the movie was seen as racial and racist and a great hue and cry was raised by
Negroes and Jews but not by the men who fought the war either North or
South. While the movie in many cases was
viewed by participants and survivors of that great conflict, and thought to
accurately represent the situation a barrage of defamation was directed at D.W.
Griffith, the director, and Thomas Dixon, the writer.
Dixon who
was a best selling author of talent and a good story teller was gradually
turned into a racist monster having no place in American literature or
culture. Both he and Griffith’s careers
began a precipitous decline following the movie and both died penniless and in
obscurity.
Now, a
hundred years later in an effort to co-opt history a new film also titled Birth
of a Nation has been written, directed and acted by Nate Parker. Nate is a Negro. His film deals with a slave uprising led by
Nat Turner in Southhampton County, Virginia in 1831. The rebellion was a murderous, bloody,
rapefest that ended as it must have once the surprise was over and the Whites
organized. But, what is meant by Nate
Parker’s filming the movie? Is it merely
to mock Griffith and Dixon or is he calling for a unification of the present
Negroes to exterminate present Whites?
In other words, a serious call for the birth of a Negro United States or
Nation? The film certainly excites the
Negro people to do battle with the White Demons. And that at a time when the Negroes are
already working themselves into a lather finding excuses to kill, burn and
loot.
The very
people who denounce Griffith and Dixon now applaud Parker as the auteur of a
fantastic picture. They little know that
they are the projected victims of the film.
However Nate
Parker has complicated the matter by having been tried for raping a White girl
in college, sort of following Griffith and Dixon’s script that was denounced as
defamatory. The White girl is
described as being unconscious, thus one imagines drugged, hence unable to give
consent as Parker claims while having gratified his hatred of Whites on the
girl’s body. Having gratified his hatred
Parker invited his Black roommate into the room to have some too. So we have a
gang rape.
So the
Griffith film in which a Negro gratifies his lust on a White girl seems to have
been reenacted by Parker even though the scene in Griffith’s film was called
inaccurate and racist.
Parker, of
course, represenst his rape of the girl as a mere youthful indiscretion and he’s
put all that behind him; convenient for him although his victim subsequently
committed suicide at the age of thirty.
Collateral damage. So let’s
forget about the mistake and concentrate on Parker’s movie that calls for lots
more murder and rape.
Let’s try to
place Parker and his movie into a historical continuum. The Nat Turner uprising occurred in South
Hampton County, Virginia in 1831 as noted.
The uprising was not too far distant in time from the 1804 revolt of
Toussaint L’Ouverture in Haiti which established the independence of Haiti from
the French. Haiti was a major event in
the consciousness of nineteenth century history. While Toussaint did not in any sense defeat
Napoleon as some historians claim he did defeat troops of the Empire. The reaction among Whites was
stupendous. Some feared an uprising in
the US like that of Nat Turner other lauded Toussaint as the greatest military
figure of all time surpassing Washington, Napoleon, Caesar and whoever. Just the greatest and that because he was a
Negro. Matthew Clavin in his fine book
Toussaint L’Ouverture and the American Civil War details the reaction to
Toussaint’s victory. All the White men
were massacred while the White women were given the choice of a horrible death
or marriage to Negroes, but a real marriage not a mockery of one. Most women chose to submit to the Negroes.
The Whites
not murdered during the Haitian Revolution fled to the nascent United
States. While France had sold Louisiana
to the US in 1803 New Orleans was still considered a French colony to which
many of the slave owners repaired bringing their slaves with them. Many of the slave owners were mulattoes and
Negroes thus New Orleans had a large corps of Negro slave owners at the time of
the Civil War.
Others
landed along the Gulf Coast so news of Haiti was general in the South among
both slave owners and slaves. This
Haitian rebellion then both incited Nat Turner and terrified the Whites. So, the result was murder, theft and rapine
what it would seem Nate Parker is inciting with his movie. As far as rape goes he knows what he’s
talking about.
Efforts are
being made to prevent the theater release in October, not only by Whites but by
Negroes also. This would seem wise. In the event of a Negro uprising that could
occur before election time or at least inauguration that might seem to justify
martial law and the continuation of Obama rule.
Some worry about this and their worries may be justified. We’ll see. I fear that the US is now two nations and not
one.
Vote Trump
anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment