Immigration vs. Vegetables

Immigration vs. Vegetables

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Liberal mind is twisted.  Well, we all know that but each new evidence of the twist is astounding.  There is a water shortage in California.  The genius mind of the Liberal translates that into the conflict is between people and agriculture therefore we have to discontinue agriculture which is using too much water versus people.

First they came for the avocadoes that it is said consume more water than is necessary for a vegetable.  Then they came for the lettuce that they said sucked water from the soil.  Now at long last they have come for the lowly radish.  Do you know that a radish is 98% water?  I think the Liberals at long last have put their finger on the problem.

So, to solve the water problem Liberals wish to forbid the cultivation of avocadoes, lettuce and radishes.  I hope they don’t learn about celery.  Celery is also 98% water and a couple dozen times bigger than a radish.

Now, California.  California is a big State.  It holds more people than it does water.  When I lived in California in the early sixties there were eighteen million people there.  Plenty of room for both people and radishes with a little water left over.  At the time they were completing the mammoth Shasta Dam with Lake Michigan behind it.  Well, a large body of water.  Beryessa was created shortly thereafter.  Enough water for while they thought.  Hell, they were even growing cotton out in the Bakersfield desert.

True, water was still a concern as dry years were a cyclical thing but they weren’t uprooting orchards so there would be enough water to flush the toilet.  Today, at this moment, there are forty-five million people in California.  Do you see the difference between 1962 and today?  Which consumes more water do you suppose, a radish or a person?  I’d like to point out here that people are just big bags of water something like the radish is a small one.

I’m betting here, not wagering just betting, that a person consumes more water in a year than does a radish.  The radish is apparently an endangered species and needs to be protected while people aren’t and don’t.

If there is a water crisis and I have to choose between more radishes or more people I’m going to opt for radishes that after all are edible.  I need food more than I need neighbors.  How about you?

Of course, if I were a Liberal I’d say bring another forty-five million people into California and to hell with agriculture.  Who needs food?  Even if it can’t be proven that Liberals aren’t insane it can be proven that they’re stupid.

Decision Time For Donald

Decision Time For Donald

by

R.E. Prindle

 

As the euphoria of having a candidate who talks the way we want him to talk fades perhaps a deeper evaluation of Donald Trump is called for.  His recent snarking of David Duke gives cause to pause.

The brutally savaged Duke who chose exile in Russia to constant debasement in the US suggested that until there was a little more light between Trump and the Jews it was a bit early to endorse his candidacy.

Indeed, since Donald is spouting off contrary to cherished Jewish goals on immigration one is astounded to see the level of vituperation no higher than it is.  Anyone old enough to remember the savaging that Johnson and Nixon took is quite aware of what Liberals and Jews are capable of.  Why are they so restrained?  Is it because Home Boy Trump is playing the stalking horse for the gang?

Fears of Trump being a mere red herring have haunted many of us from the beginning.  Is the whole thing merely a charade?  Is it a clever script in which fake brouhahas such as, perhaps, the tiff between Trump and Megyn Kelly during the first debate is meant to divert and amuse us so we neglect the substantive issues?

Trump’s reaction to David Duke is troubling.  True, Duke has been pushed outside and shunned as disreputable but as time goes by his views are being substantiated.  Donald’s reaction fits a Jewish script perfectly.  He says he doesn’t want Duke’s endorsement and if he got it he’d reject it.  Still, Donald appears to have a very close relationship to what Duke might call the Jewish Occupation Government.  Perhaps closer than the traitorous Congress we have now. 

How is it that the premier of Israel, another government, arrives in the US and addresses Congress without the US president’s leave?  How is that?  Why wasn’t he thrown out of the country?  Does Netanyahu believe this country’s ‘special relationship’ gives him precedence in our politics?  Why wouldn’t he, he got away with it.

Duke’s questioning of Trump’s acceptance of that relationship is perfectly legitimate.  What would Trump do if Netanyahu repeated his insolence?  Donald has to decide whether he is going to reject the ‘special relationship’ and reassert US preeminence or he is wasting his time and ours.  Donald can kiss his hopes goodbye if he refuses to address these questions of Duke’s and ours.

Stand and deliver Donald Trump.

Wolf Hitler Under The Microscope

Wolf Hitler Under The Microscope

by

R.E. Prindle

 

After nearly a century since Adolf Hitler was made chancellor of Germany his role in the events of his times has never been clarified.  The victors, as is said, write the histories to their advantage.  The victors were the Judaeo-Communists and in their version of history Wolf Hitler is the supreme villain, the scapegoat to bear their own sins into the desert.  But does a review of the period from a more objective viewpoint demonstrate this to be true?  I think not.  I think the perpetrators, the real aggressors, the Judaeo-Communists, project their own villainy unto Hitler and the Nazis.

Hitler operated within the framework postulated by the Jews who were over fifty percent of every national Communist Party, the remainder have to be viewed as their confederates.  Let us review what the Jews and Communists did and what they would have done had not Nazi Germany stood between them and the total destruction of civilization.

-1-

Contrary to all expectations the Bolshevik Revolution succeeded first in Russia rather than in Germany as was supposed.  Having seized the government of Russia in 1917 there was a large question as to whether they could keep it.  Resistance to their rule was fierce if futile in the end.  Armed resistance continued for at least three years in what the West considered a civil war but which the combatants believed was a continuation of the World War.  Indeed, the English, French, Japanese and Americans maintained forces within Russia for those years.

The world justifiably feared a Bolshevik victory, for in fact the Bolsheviks utterly destroyed civilization in Russia returning the country to a state of barbarity.  Perhaps the barbarity was of such a quality that it wasn’t a return but a new thing, unseen in the history of the world before.  It certainly burst upon European sensibilities in that way.

Europeans watched aghast as all the appurtenances of civilization were stripped away leaving a desolate starving people to exist as they might as Soviet hounds murdered and arrested filling concentration camps with the least of the dissenters and critics.

In addition to Lenin proclaiming the world wide Bolshevik Revolution he created the Communist International sending agents to every country in the world to create discord.   Revolutionary attempts were fomented in Germany in several places as in Hungary, Poland and Vienna.  At the same time soviets were organized in England, France, the US, everywhere.  It truly looked as though the Bolsheviks would triumph worldwide.

Screaming their war cry of expropriate the expropriators, loot the looters, the Bolshevik government stole anything of value from private citizens while looting the public treasury and the churches.  They took priceless artefacts and whatever gold they could find.  Hitler was a mere piker compared to the Soviets.

Having completely ruined the ample Czarist economic basis in the mad orgy of looting the Bolsheviks learned that without production there was nothing to tax.  The revolution found itself penniless except for the expendable wealth accumulated under the Czars.  But once that was gone and it went fast when everything including food had to be purchased from outside the country so that the Bolsheviks were reduced to bartering diamonds, jewels, old paintings, furs, the Church icons.  Nor did the income go to feeding the people, the leaders had fleets or Rolls Royces, also looted, that had to be maintained.

One good thing about the impoverishment of the people is that there were no other cars on the road to interfere with Lenin’s and Trotsky’s driving pleasure.

As I say, the Europeans viewed this folly aghast as they desperately put down all the revolutionary attempts.  They could imagine the purges of tens even hundreds of millions murdered or gathered into concentration camps as slaves to be worked to death.

But, what if the Bolsheviks had succeeded in conquering Europe which they would have done except for one shining knight who arose in Germany, Adolf Hitler.  Hitler formed a barrier to keep Soviet armies from overrunning the West but he couldn’t defend against ideological encirclement.

The struggle then is not between countries but between ideologies.  How many ideologies were involved?  There was Communism and its variants, of course,  Fascism which incorporates Nazism.  Nazism itself was a form of German nationalism not differing from Jewish nationalism.   There was the International Money Trust that sought domination through banking and currencies.  They today are in the saddle.  Most in importance was international Jewry.  All these ideologies were competing for world dominion.  A common thread among all was the interpenetration of International Jewry.

Some might object to treating Jewry as an independent political entity.  Some might call such an inclusion anti-Semitism.  Both depictions would be wrong.  The Jews do and have always considered themselves an independent, that is, autonomous people merely residing among the gentile nations.  They are and always have worked for their own paramount interest over all others.  Thus the real effect of their working within the other ideologies is to bend them toward their own objectives.  They imagine that when the smoke has cleared they will be atop the heap.

Wolf Hitler discerned this quite clearly and he perceived that if the continuing European Holocaust of the Judaeo-Communists was not stopped the terrifying destruction of European civilization as in Russia would be repeated in Western Europe, thus he courageously interposed Germany between the Soviets and West in an attempt to save Civilization.  It is on this basis that many people consider him a religious savior on the order of Jesus the Christ.  Whether true or not it was at the sacrifice of his own life and that of the German people that the West was spared the worst of the Bolshevik Revolution although still involved in the European Holocaust caused by the Judaeo-Communists, the war was more than terrifying.

In the absence of Hitler’s heroic leadership let us extrapolate the events in Russia throughout the whole of Europe.  Let us suppose as the Jews fantasize that they had succeeded in assassinating Hitler in 1922 and the Communist revolution instead of failing in the West had succeeded.  This is kind Ray Bradburyish but this cis-science fiction.

There would have been no US intervention in the twenties so that the US based International Money Trust would have been in a position to nearly seize the European remains.  Fascism would have ceased to exist so that in the temporal sense the Communist victory would have been complete.

In terms of ideology it is important to understand the Jewish relationship to Europe.  It was, is and remains antagonistic to Europe.  One only has to examine Barbara Spectre’s current Paideia Organization to determine that.  The antagonism was both to Europe as a civilization and its customs and mores.  When one of the leading lights of the Jewish revolution Sigmund Freud writes that then current morality revolted him he means European customs and morality as opposed to those of Judaea.  He further says that he intends to eradicate European morality.  There is no reason to doubt him or that he was very successful.  He was a leading agent of the Jewish revolution although his role has been well concealed.

The Jewish revolution itself is well explained by the American rabbi Abba Hillel Silver in his book History Of Messianic Speculation In Israel.  He writes that after the failure of the messiah Sabbatai Zevi in the Seventeenth Century the elders decided to never rely on a single messiah again but the Jewish people as a whole would work for their own redemption.  God was thus melded into the Jewish mentality and Judaism became wholly secular.  All this chat about ‘secular’ Jews as opposed to religious Jews is utter nonsense.  Trotsky, for instance, was a Jew, period.  The years 1913 to 1928 were designated as the time of redemption.  These dates would have been remarkably accurate except for the interposition of Wolf Hitler. He was a real spoiler.

While events can never be exactly planned if one is alert one seizes one’s chances.  Having begun the World War that nearly destroyed European civilization a remarkable piece of good fortune for the Bolsheviks occurred when the Germans transported them from Switzerland to the Finland Station in 1917 put the Jewish triumph within its reach between 1917 and 1928.

Having murdered their three hundred and some odd year enemy the Czar the Jewish revolution roared back into the West from Russia in the early twenties and could have succeeded except for the fact that German nationalists led by Hitler were capable of seizing the State, although legally and democratically elected, and smashing the Judaeo-Communist conspiracy within Germany.  Miraculously foiled as it were the Jewish revolution was able to adapt to circumstances and prosper.

Now, how demonic was Hitler in relation to the society created by Judaeo-Communists after 1917.  The Reds, for a convenient inclusive term, developed the notion of mass murder or genocide after seizing power in Russia.  They created concentration camps and slave labor well before Hitler became chancellor in 1933.  Hitler was merely acting according to the political mores introduced by the Judaeo-Communists.

And so, at great cost to the German people he prevented the realization of the Jewish Thousand Year Reich or Millennium from occurring.  Let us suppose for moment he hadn’t and after 1922 the Jews had realized their two age long dream of establishing themselves as the Princes of the Earth.  What would have happened in Western Europe?

-II-

The final Jewish goal is denationalization, is sowing confusion by the bastardization of other nations, lowering the racial level of the highest, and dominating this racial stew by exterminating the volkish intelligentsia and replacing it with its own race.

Hitler, quoted by Anthony Cave Brown and

Charles B. MacDonald, On A Field Of Red, p. 282

Hitler was living within history, hence was able to analyze and extrapolate historical trends.  He dealt in realities and not inner wishful thinking.  Therefore the Jews and allies have portrayed him as stupid and demented.  Judging from current realities in Europe and North America Hitler’s quoted analysis above is beyond prescience.  Those with less acumen find the above quote ‘nutty.’  I have to confess that I wouldn’t have understood what he was talking about a few years ago.  It now appears Wolf understood the Semitic mind perfectly.

There can be no other purpose in flooding Europe and the US with racial ideological peoples who have nothing in common with the West except perhaps a nebulous and inconsequential ‘humanity.’

Understanding, then, Jewish goals Hitler moved to abort them.  In this he was temporarily successful.  Having now recovered the Jews have once again moved to the offensive.  They now disclaim any affiliation with what they call Whites proclaiming in their recently formulated mantra:  I’m not White, I’m Jewish.

But, what if Germany had not interposed its body and the Jewish led Bolshevik assault on Europe had succeeded?  The riches of two thousand years of European civilization would have been at the feet of assembled Judaea.

The accumulated wealth of Russia had seemed vast but it was as nothing compared to the rest of Europe which was a real Aladdin’s cave.  As in Russia the Jews would have destroyed the economic structure that created wealth.  Once they had done so the Communists belatedly realizing that they had destroyed the productivity of the country and the need for money to rebuild it did the only thing they could do, they turned to West and said:  Come.  Make us whole.

While after the conquest of Central and Western Europe that economy would have been destroyed,  the waste land would have stretched from the British Isles to the Pacific shore.  Of course there was still the simple minded United States although in the twenties not yet under Judaeo-Communist control.  Normalcy ruled there.  Still both American and Jewish bankers in the US actually were eager to invest in destroyed Russia and they would have been just as eager in destroyed Europe.

The Jews, then, would have occupied the castles, villas and stately houses amassing estates, jewelry, tens of thousands of fine paintings, the big automobiles as was done in Russia.  Huge amounts of Russian jewelry, paintings and artefacts had been delivered to Vienna for the delectation of wealthy Jews.  How many of those stolen paintings were later appropriated by the Nazis isn’t clear.  But none were returned to their former Russian owners.

And as was done in Russia to the Russian Orthodox Church the Jewel of the West the Roman Catholic Church would have been vandalized to the great satisfaction of the Jews, gratifying their hatred for Christianity to the point of satiety.  For two thousand years the Catholic Church had contained the Jews defining their place in the European polity.

When the French Revolution mistakenly dissolved the restraints releasing the Jews as an army of asymmetrical warriors the misguided but benevolent Europeans were doomed.  In their ridiculous altruism they didn’t even know a war was going on except for the besmirched ‘anti-Semites’ such as Wolf Hitler.

The Europeans fancied that the Jews accepted and were playing by the rules Europeans had devised.  They weren’t, that’s the essence of asymmetrical war.  Hey, they were playing by a different set of rules dissembling the Europeans.  Thus, after the Bolshevik assault the Europeans failed to recognize that the Bolsheviks were essentially operating under Jewish rules so they failed to adapt their rules to fit the ‘new paradigm’, that setting the new rules for how the game was played.

As Darwin pointed out, in evolutionary terms when one species fails to adapt to new circumstances it is doomed to extinction.  Darwin uses as an example the invasion of the small Asian cockroach into Russia that drove the larger but less aggressive Russian cockroach to extinction.  So the Bolsheviks manhandled the Europeans.

The West was presented with no choice but to do what the Judeo-Communists and Nazis did: establish concentration camps and toss the enemies of civilization into them.  Yes, the state of affairs had come to that.  Adapt or perish.

Thus, had the Bolshevik assault on Europe succeeded in the first rush millions upon tens of millions would have been either murdered outright or sent as slaves to Siberian concentration camps to be worked to death under the most deplorable starvation conditions.  To hear the Jews complain that they lost a couple million in their war of conquest merely raises a smile.  There are risks in any enterprise.

Was Wolf Hitler the most evil person the world had ever seen?  Not hardly.  Within the new mores established by the Bolsheviks his response was, shall we say, normal.  To say Hitler was demented is to unjustly single him out from even worse in the asylum.

And then there was the Roman Catholic Church, the supreme Jewish bete noire- Christianity.  The Vatican the greatest treasure trove in existence.  Killing the Czar would be meaningless next to killing the Pope and the whole College of Cardinals.  You think it wouldn’t have happened?  Look at how the Jews have compelled the simpleton on the Papal throne to crawl before them now.  See how they have forced him to endorse the bastardization of Europe by the invasion from Sub-Saharan Africa and the Moslem world.  True, the Jews don’t have the manpower to do actual battle with the Europeans but they can import untold millions who can  just as in the US the Jews are using the Negroes and immigration to dominate he Aryans. They’re not White, they’re Jews.

-III-

Wolf Hitler did not start the war with the Jews that became WWII.  That war officially began in 1933 when the Jews declared war on Hitler.  Once again, the Jews had no means of waging war except through the virtual control of Western governments especially the US and USSR.  Thus, if the Jews paid the supreme penalty of having lost a few million, if that many were, the fault was none but theirs.  No guilt accrues to the Aryans.

If the Jews did lose a few million that was as nothing compared to the tens of millions of dead Europeans and the near utter destruction of Europe and its civilization.  Freudian fantasies realized.

There is no need to shed tears for the Jews, we should look to ourselves.  We should reexamine the roles played by the Jews, the Bolsheviks and Germans and, I might add, the US itself.

This reevaluation has actually been going on more or less clandestinely for a few decades increasing dramatically recently but so far making no dent on the public consciousness.  Jewish propaganda is preponderant.

There can be no question but that Wolf Hitler was a great Aryan hero.  If some consider him a god there is reason to do so.  Perhaps the Jewish Revolution was a time of heroes.  There are those who consider Leon Trotsky to be the greatest Jew since Jesus which is to say a god.  Stalin himself wielded power as a god murdering at will and not just one or two people but tens of millions, the whole intelligentsia of Russia, the most productive and intelligent cultivators of the soil, anybody who did not embrace the Red religion.  Roosevelt to some was a supreme hero while, I’m sure, a god unto himself.

Wolf’s role was to defeat the Jews and Bolsheviks which at great cost to his people he did. The end result of WWII was that the Bolsheviks were contained as what the Jews considered to be Fascists seized the US and Western Europe dividing the world into ‘Fascist’ and Communist spheres.  But, that’s the way Jews and Communists think.  There are only two sides, us and them.

Of course the war did not end with Hitler’s death but continues to this day in what appears to be more than a hundred years war.  The Jews are waging asymmetrical war, a propaganda war, a psychological war.  Having enlisted the Negroes on their US battlefield they direct their antagonism toward ‘Whites’ who they say have no place on Earth.  Thus in preparation to protecting themselves from Negro antagonism they are projecting themselves as not White but Jews.  ‘I’m not White, I’m Jewish.’  A new propaganda device has been developed in the fanciful belief that by declaring the words of the song that the Negroes will disregard their skin color and lose their hatred of the Jews qua Jews earned because of long Jewish exploitation of them.

As Einstein said that a definition of lunacy was doing the same thing over and over expecting different results, so the Jews are once again creating a disaster for themselves.

Wolf was no more evil than Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin and, If I may so, Roosevelt.  Wolf adapted to the mores of his times created by the Jews and Bolsheviks themselves.  It is important to remember that they set the tone of the times, all others followed their lead in one way or another.

The other White governments refused to adapt, preferring to follow what were ineffective superseded mores that could only have led to their ruin.  In the twenties there would have been no US intervention in the Bolshevik takeover of all Europe and the destruction of its civilization and mores. The Freudian game plan would have been completely successful.  The Jewish conquest of Europe and Christianity would have ushered in their so-called Millennium.

Wolf Hitler was a hero.  I’m not Jewish, I’m Aryan.

Donald Trump: The Man On The White Horse

Donald Trump:

The Man On The White Horse

by

R.E. Prindle

 

This will come as no surprise of course, but according to Patrick Buchanan a serious movement to deny Trump membership in the Republican Party is afoot.  Denied as a Republican then the lineup at the next presidential ‘debate’ will be a lineup of non-entities.  Sorry all, but none of you have the qualifications for the big job.  Hence the Republicans are out of the race and the Republican Party is as dead as the Tea Party.  Where or where shall we be without John Boehner?

Trump will be cast adrift.  Is a third party an answer?  I don’t think so.  Even TR couldn’t pull that one out and he really thought he could.  However let us remember that Trump is a TV celebrity.  If he can be persuaded to get a team around him a la the comic book heroes The Blackhawks, or a group like the Beatles or Rolling Stones I think it is possible he could win as an individual leading the team, a movie star like Reagan, a hero, the lead singer.

I can hear you laughing but when you get through laughing consider the idea in a colder light.

Who trusts politicians?  Who believes politicians are interested in anyone but themselves?  What causes do they champion?  Tea bagging, hugging the guys?  Tough lesbian gals?  What politicians would you like to be like or have your kid grow up to be like?  None of them.  They’re useless.  I’m embarrassed by all.

Look at the movies.  Capt. America and his gang, the X-Men, these identities as ideals are what we want.  Honest, decent types who are willing to right wrongs, put things in order.

Trump, right now, is a virtual solo act, like The Shadow.  Captain America without the supporting cast.  Doc Savage, The Man Of Bronze without his crew.

A third party has never and won’t work.  If Trump doesn’t choose to run as The Man of Steel there will be no need for an election, just let the Democrats put their candidate in place.   Without Trump it’s all over now.  Get moving Donald.  Put together an organization.  Stand up and be the champion of America.

More Statesmanship Donald Trump Please

Donald Trump:  More Statesmanship Please

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Rand Paul whose chances of gaining the Republican nomination are nil was needlessly savaged by the leading candidate, Donald Trump.  Paul had apparently run a full page ad, perhaps in a NYC paper, in which he merely questioned Donald’s Republican credentials.  Donald responded in a violent diatribe meant to crush Paul who, after all, is a fellow Republican and potential ally.

Donald not only savaged Paul but also insulted the whole people of Kentucky Paul’s home State.  Rein it in Donald.  Save the savaging for the Democrats; make friends within the Republican ranks.

Perhaps you might have taken the occasion to say you understand Paul’s doubts but that you had a conversion on the road to Damascus.  You fell down a Democrat and got up a Republican.  Rand Paul could have understood that.  But, seriously, Donald, many of us who think well of you would like to hear about your political stance.

Was anything to be gained by your recent speech in Saginaw savaging Ford Motors?  Perhaps they should reconsider spending two and a half billion US dollars for a plant in Mexico.  Still, I’m from Saginaw and I might think twice about putting the plant there.

Consider, Donald:  Since I left Saginaw in 1956 the town has shrunk by 60% and the remainder is a huge slum, worse than a slum, in which it is possible to buy a house for 2,000.00.  You heard right, $2000.00.

The problem there is a racial problem as in Detroit.  Negroes vs. Whites.

Now, seriously, Donald what is your attitude toward that racial problem evidencing itself in such diverse places as Saginaw, Flint, Detroit, St. Louis, Richmond, and Baltimore just for starters?

Bluster won’t deal with that.  I see no evidence that you are building your organization.  Your cabinet is of especial interest.  You need a Brain Trust along the lines Roosevelt had.  Who are the people that will support your administration and make it shine?

You can’t do it alone Donald.  I don’t mean to be presumptuous but, I can help.

We like your forcefulness Donald, but we’re looking for statesmanship also.  Make it up with Rand Donald, he might be useful a little further on down the road.

The Republican Dog And Pony Show

The Republican Dog And Pony Show

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/192690/donald-trump-the-vaudevillian

 

Mr. Liel Leibowitz writing for Tablet Magazine has titled his latest effort Donald Trump, The Last Of The Great Vaudevillians.

Liel hates Trump.  I quote:  His stupid statements aren’t designed to be insightful or even true; they’re designed to give a jolt.

And:

Quote:

In his short run, Trump has given us a taste of a tradition we [Jews] have carefully crafted and a reminder that sometimes, to have a serious talk, you need a bloated loudmouth unafraid to offend.

Unquote.

Does the above mean that Jews are tutoring Trump and all is just an act?  To put himself in conflict in relation to Trump’s ‘stupid statements’ Liel offers us this:

Quote:

Thankfully, immigrants are still knocking on the country’s doors, looking for the same old promise of life and liberty and happiness.  I’m proud to be one of them.  But the cultural machinery these days isn’t interested in common dreams.  It’s interested in catering and preserving differences in the molecules of gender and race and sexual orientation.

Unquote.

So Liel tells he left the totalitarian State of Israel to find life, liberty and happiness in what appears in his eyes to be a disgustingly hateful US that despises his sexual orientation of which we are left to guess.  Must have been horrible if he had to leave Israel to practice it.  Well, we all have problems.  Liel nevertheless has brought up a point worthy of consideration.  This campaign may be designed to be a vaudevillan travesty of an election.  While I resent Liel’s indication that Trump will be the star clown I think there may be some merit in his observation.

There are indications that the election could be an internecine squabble between the hothouse occupants of the New York City-Washington DC axis in which we voters are irrelevant.  It calls into question the notion of the ‘debate’ as pure entertainment.  Trump gloats that he gave Faux News the highest ratings ever.  He was the star of the show, Megyn Kelly being the female lead.  Man-woman, key of any drama.  However the magnificent staging and organization, not to mention scripting, must have been the conception of Fox unless Trump with the knowledge of showmanship he has acquired from his TV reality show is behind the whole thing.

A lot was given away on the show.  We learned that Donald has contributed money to every single candidate on the stage thus putting them under obligation which he also admitted.  We learned that having contributed money to the Clinton’s, man and wife, they felt obliged to or were commanded to attend one of Donald’s weddings.  He’s a much married man.  Over the years then the whole coterie of politicians and businessmen from Obama on down have developed into an intimate circle.

As a vaudeville show the drama and action was fast paced with an astounding variety of acts.  Offstage was Hillary Clinton who was repeatedly referred to as the Democratic nominee.  We may have been let in on a secret there too.  That one’s over.  Midway in the show an Obama Commissar visited the show to reprimand Megyn Kelly for not taking Donald to task for a lack of feminist zeal as Republicans, pointed out several times, are a group of misogynists.  If that opinion was based on the fact that nobody would want to manhandle the repellent Commissar I don’t think misogyny was the issue.

This Commissar was from central casting.  A sturdy, homely, strident wench, she strutted on stage like an angry bull dyke barking orders.  I don’t know for sure she was but, god, she frightened me and I’m as manly as they come.  I don’t have to man up, it’s where I live.  Her repressed sexuality was obvious.  While Megyn was not disguising that she was a womanly woman showing us a lot of attractive thigh the Commissar wore a strange skirt.  It fell below the knee exposing nothing but ankle but curiously it had a broad white stripe on the sides that might have been confused as showing a considerable amount of skin.  Not that I was that curious.  After roaring out commands like the bulliest of dykes she stomped off stage apparently headed to the bull pen.

It was a curious episode especially when combined with the clown act of Luntz the Pollster.

As a vaudeville show then the ‘debates’ was a tight compact show tightly and well performed as though the politicians were experienced actors happy to tread the boards once more.  There was a superb drama between Donald and Megyn who obviously were on intimate terms.  Like I said, an internecine combat.

I’m not sure what’s going on so I’m going to curb my enthusiasm for Donald Trump until the show develops a little further.  There are really only nine months before the nominees are declared.  A lot depends on who drops out now.  Seventeen hopefuls is ridiculous.  If no one drops out between now and the next ‘debate’ we’ll know that the fix is in.  Judging from the evening’s entertainment Hillary is the designated Democratic candidate but how Donald will fit in isn’t clear.  He may just be the chief actor in this vaudeville farce or they may deny him a place in the next one completely ignoring the fact that he is number one in  the polls.

My thanks to Leil Leibowitz for his misdirected but perhaps accurate observation.

Republican Feys vs. Straights

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Well, the divide between Republicans is official.  The Feys have declared war on the Straights and their candidate Donald Trump.  He, they say, is to be shunned.  The fey Lindsey Graham has all but stated that the Fey party is merely the right wing of the Democratic Party.  The Feys have chosen as their leader Megyn Kelly.

Ms. Kelly on the recent ‘debates’ baited Mr. Trump with fact that in a personal exchange with Rosie O’ Donnell he referred to her as a ‘slut.’  This was incorrect for her to do but I notice on the Urban Dictionary site that one Sally, a very contemporary lady, defines slut as a woman with the morals of men.  Now I want you to think about this Megyn, I presume she refers to more or less indiscriminate sex as the dominate characteristic of all men.  In that sense given the sexual mores of the time that definition perhaps defines the majority of women in the West.

I would challenge Ms. Kelly to prove that she is a virgin and hence by Sally’s definition not a slut.  Failing that perhaps Ms. Kelly can show us the notches on her belt so we make our own determination of her slut status.  My fear is that it might not be pretty.  Ms. Kelly in fact by Sally’s reckoning may very well be a slut.

She sure is pretty and I don’t know whether she had a hand in formulating the questions for the ‘debate’ or not but the narrowness of the subject matter seemed to avoid the more vital questions facing the next president if Obama chooses to step down.

Whether or not women are sluts may be crucial to Ms. Kelly as perhaps she is over sensitive on the issue and maybe with reason but I would like to offer my understanding of what a slut is, so, I’m not talking about you Lindsey Graham but maybe I could.

Certain laws have been passed that impose civil disabilities on White heterosexual males making them second class citizens while protecting White male homosexuals and all White women.

White women have stood by without objection and allowed these laws to pass unquestioned.  My question to Ms. Kelly then is what kind of woman allows, nay, applauds laws that disenfranchise her men?  That’s my question to you, Megyn.  My answer is a slut, a whore to other races.  Oh, to be sure, you’ve been well paid to assume your position there at Fox.  I wouldn’t call it a piece of meat because I’m not rude but I hope you’re enjoying it.

I do ask the White women of America how they can participate  in the humiliation of their men.? It is only something sluts would do and I ask you, Megyn,  to consider the question and perhaps bring it up at your next ‘debate.’  Inquiring minds want to know.

As a note to Donald Trump:  You should make the hate laws a major issue which should get you the vote of every straight White man and at least half the women.  Why mess around with insubstantial issues when more important issues will get more votes?

The Republican Debates: War Of The Words, First Round

The First Republican Debate:

The War Of The Words

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The first Republican debate was a hoot, a great entertainment, real showbiz, with a wonderful caste of performers.  The good news is that the candidates intend to do something; the bad news is that that they intend to do what they aren’t doing now.  What are you supposed to think?  Nevertheless it was a really wonderful colorful show full of sound and fury, a three ring circus but alas, with no aerials.  Next time.

The highlight of the show for me was the Abbot and Costello act between Christie and Rand Paul.  Top notch.  Paul’s facials were terrific.  Great laughs.  For some reason, well, perhaps because they were shills the ringmasters all thought that Christie got the better of Rand while I though Paul humiliated Christie.  Drudge’s poll numbers seemed to confirm my impression as Paul drew a 7% favorable while Christie was weighted down with a meager 1%.  Kudos to both great standups and a huggie to each.

The main attraction in ring one was the hard punching Jack Dempsey lookalike, Battling Donald Trump.  Did it with one hand tied behind his back.  It was kind of get Donnie night; let’s see how badly we can humiliate him.   My advice is to give that up; Trump is bullet proof; he can’t be hurt.  We all know what a rotten guy he is but being rotten is just the right quality for the rotten job ahead.  We all know he’s slugged it out amongst the really big tough guys and like the former Cassius Clay he appears to be unscarred.  Lost a little hair but, what the hell?  At least he’s still on his feet and slugging.  He knows the ins and outs of tough dealing both dirty and otherwise.  Valuable knowledge in any day and age.  That’s the kind of guy we need to duke it out with the heathen Chinee.  Go get ‘em Don.  How come only Don mentioned economics?

Sex scandals are useless.  If Don hasn’t laid them all, perhaps even like Hercules, fifty a night, he’s not the man he lets on to be.  I believe he must have made it with the head inquisitor (no pun intended)  Megan, oops, Meagon, did I get that right? Kelly.  At least that’s the way their little set to looked to me.

Don was fearless aiming well directed shots and timely blows to the ringmasters’ flailings.  Apparently he had to explain life to these dewlaps.  If you want to know Don’s methods study the life of that infamous bench sitter Bernard Baruch.  Bernie virtually controlled Frank Roosevelt.  FDR complained that Bernie owned 60, count ‘em, 60 congressmen.  They voted the way Bernie wanted.  Beginning to figure Congress out yet?

So when the Trumper explained the facts of life to the ringmasters that hell yes, when you give a million you expect something in return.  When Bob Dylan’s friend explained that everyone who gets something has to give something he reached in his pocket and felt with his thumb and gave her his very last piece of gum.  Everybody must give something for something they get.  Yeh, it just follows.

Then the lordly Don looked down the row and said: ‘All these gentlemen have come to me for contributions.  All those gentlemen shifted from foot to foot.

For the rest it was a wan crew, Marco Rubio did his Mickey Rooney act, Huckabee scored a great emotional high for knocking Obama’s ridiculous habit of calling Republicans terrorists.  Walker, from whom much was expected, proved disappointing.  Nice fellow but not the right timber.  He pledged no daylight between Israel and the US if elected.  A couple demerits for that from this quarter.

And then they brought in the clowns.  Some guy who claimed to be a pollster, polled twenty members of the audience and told them what to think and they made the appropriate noises.  Beep, beep.

Altogether it was great.  When the performers had left the ring and the crowd had trailed out the post-show compered by Sean Hannity was at least as good as the main show.  The performers removed, well, not blackface but darkface at least and gosh were they a whiter shade of pale. Ted Cruz didn’t look mestizo at all.

Trump of course was still the main attraction, this time handled with more deference by Hannity.  Don looks good, my only concern is how deferential will he have to be to those who lent him the money to get where he is.  Is there any light between them and him?

Remember, Louis B. Mayer got all the credit for MGM but look at the MGM logo.  A great big lion roars over a small Metro Goldwyn Mayer banner.  Lion in Yiddish is loewe and Loewe’s is the NYC company who controlled MGM and Louis B. Mayer.  I wonder if Don dances to the same ringmasters.

Analyzing The Holocausts

Analyzing The Holocausts-  European And Jewish

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Jews have appropriated the ancient word Holocaust to a specific Jewish use but it would appear that the Jewish holocaust of WWII was a minor happening within the much larger, huge, European Holocaust that grew out of the Judaeo-Communist manifestation of the nineteenth century.

Currently the Jews call attention to art works ‘stolen’ from them by the Nazis that individual Jews want ‘returned.’  When all unrestituted thefts within the overall European Holocaust are considered Jewish complaints diminish to the vanishing point.

When the Jewish led revolution of 1917 took place the entire Russian country was looted from top to bottom.  Anything of value was ‘appropriated’ as the Judaeo-Communists express it.  The entire aristocracy had everything of value taken.  Warehouses bulged with fur coats, art works, books, jewelry and anything of value.  Kitchen utensils for Christ’s sake.

The Jews murdered the Czar and the Czarina as well as their innocent poor little tiny babies and children, stealing whatever the Romanovs had acquired over three centuries.  Now, this is the key, the Russian Orthodox churches were stripped of everything of value while the churches were burned and destroyed wholesale.  At the same time anti-Semitism was made punishable by law while synagogues were protected.   There was no war on religion per se; there was a war on Christianity while Judaism was protected.

The gulag system was created while millions of Russians suspected of breathing while alive were murdered outright or destroyed in the gulag system.

The monsters Lenin and Trotsky attempted to foment revolution throughout Europe to replicate what was happening in Russia.  They succeeded temporarily in Hungary murdering tens of thousands there while appropriating what they could.  Multiple revolutions were attempted and put down in Germany.  The Communist assault on German institutions created the National Socialist reaction.  The Nazis were a mere reflection of Judaeo-Communism not an original political system.

Let us consider for a moment what would have happened if the Judaeo-Communists had triumphed.  All of Europe would ultimately have been overrun.  Apart from the tens of millions of nationalist Germans, French, Italians, Spanish and whoever that would have been murdered outright or boarded into cattle cars headed to the Siberian gulag, a looting of Europe would have taken place that would have made the colossal looting or Russia miniscule and anything the Jews lost negligible.

Consider the Roman Catholic Church with its vast treasures that the Jews coveted.  The Jews had been praying for the destruction of the Catholic Church for two millennia.  Imagine the glee when the Jews appropriated all that wealth, trampling all those crosses.  Imagine the villas and castles, the Vatican, that the Jews would have appropriated.   Imagine the Jews jumping joyously up and down on the Pope’s bed, wearing his slippers shouting, You kiss mine and I’ll kiss yours.  Perhaps the destruction would have equaled the Jewish-Allied bombing of Europe during WWII or exceeded it.

Having accomplished the Russian looting no claims of the Russians expropriated of their belongings have ever been returned or even considered while the Jews are now claiming previous ownership of what are now multi-million dollar works of art.  The transfer of wealth goes on- expropriate and then claim.

Can you even possibly begin to fathom the hypocrisy of this people.  Enough, shelve your guilt and call Stop to this idiocy.

A Review: The Life And Times Of Andrew Loog Oldham

A Review

The Life And Times Of

Andrew Loog Oldham

Of The Rolling Stones

by

R.E. Prindle

Oldham, Andrew Loog: Stoned, 2001, Vintage

Oldham, Andrew Loog:  2Stoned, 2003, Vintage

Oldham, Andrew Log:  Stone Free, 2012, Escargot Books

Oldham, Andrew Loog:  Rolling Stoned, 2013, Because Entertainment

 

-1-

Who Is Andrew Loog Oldham

For those who know this introduction will be superfluous, but for those who don’t know this essay will be an introduction to a man who through his exploitation of the Rolling Stones was an important influence on that memorable Sixties decade.  Perhaps moreso than is commonly thought.

Out on the consuming edge of the record industry in those days the name Andrew Loog Oldham seemed to be displayed as prominently on the record covers as The Rolling Stones themselves.  In the early days Andrew Loog Oldham might be known before Mick or Keith and certainly the other members of the band.  Yet Oldham wasn’t in the band so who was he?  And then records were issued bearing the name The Andrew Loog Oldham Orchestra.  Where did he get that name Loog anyway?  And just as suddenly the name Andrew Loog Oldham disappeared but the Stones remained.  Who was this guy anyway?

In those days when information could be gathered, if at all, at the proverbial snail’s pace, things have changed today when I can make a few clicks and see Andrew moving and hear him speaking; actually see his fabulous style of dressing as he described it.  In addition he has written two thousand pages describing himself more or less in full.  Now we can know who Andrew Loog Oldham is and what his relationship to the Rolling Stones was.

Andrew’s, we’ll take a familiar approach throughout, great tragedy is that his fated life opportunity showed up too early.  He was only nineteen in 1963 when the opportunity that few ever get a chance to grasp showed up on his front doorstep, so to speak.  That was the appearance of the London music group The Rolling Stones.  In order to come into his inheritance as he was under twenty-one and couldn’t legally act in his own name, Andrew had to find a surrogate to act in his stead.  Chance provided an old reprobate by the name of Eric Easton.  Eric was a plodder who had served as an organist at the resort town of Blackpool while representing two or three nondescript acts of which one was the redoubtable Mrs. Miller.  While not a household name at the present time Mrs. Miller whose act consisted of being an amusingly terrible singer, had her moment in the spotlight both in England and the US.  She did have records released and they did sell no matter how modestly.

Easton was slow on the uptake not realizing the cultural shift that was taking place with the arrival of the Beatles and would have been incapable of managing the Stones without Andrew’s grasp of the changing cultural situation of the Sixties.  However he was not too slow to understand money in the bank of which he made off with a fortune or two much to the chagrin of both Andrew and the Rolling Stones.

Andrew’s four volumes are records of his vicissitudes being a young Lancelot reaching for the Grail.  Andrew was green, he was.  In ordinary times he would have been cleaned and discarded never to be heard of again but these were the Sixties and not normal times.  Even in failure the times conspired to make Andrew comfortable by luxury standards, perhaps even rich, but not filthy rich.  The marvelous Sixties did that for so many people most of them undeserving.  By undeserving I mean takers with nothing to offer.

Well, this isn’t a tale about justice but one of the Sixties in which the whole concept of justice disappeared like the vapor from a nuclear plant.  As an extra special gift of the times to Andrew he is today still alive and kicking having passed the seventh decade barrier at 71 years of age.  The good didn’t necessarily die young just the unlucky.  Andy is lucky.

He can be seen introducing his third book, Stone Free, at his Face Book site for those interested.  Always the fashion plate he is a dapper impression of his hero Phil Spector, pointy nose and all.  His hair is becomingly combed back on the sides making for a very presentable 71 year old young at heart gentleman.  He wears a mint green light jacket and shirt, something of a cross between a butch femme and an effete hommy, but altogether passable.  He projects a pleasant aura indicating little brain damage from his very legendary drug use.  A look at him shows how Alex, the chief Droog of A Clockwork Orange may have looked as he made the passage from rough youth to a more dignified mature, the word ‘old’ does not apply to one like Andrew, or I might vainly say, myself.

-II-

Andrew Finds That Life Has It Hazards

I don’t really envy the English kids that came along after my birth year of 1938.  The war years were tough enough but then the long years of national poverty after 1945 must have been grating.  I can’t imagine a life without candy that the lads and lasses had to endure for nine long years.  In my paradise in the US candy bars in those days at a nickel were monstrous.  I couldn’t eat a whole one at one sitting.  Stuffed at less than a half.  Andrew must have known hardship and suffered horribly.

The war babies, mostly from ’42 and ’43 can have no memory of the war but the long ten years of rationed everything gave a cast to their psyches.  When the war babies grew up and became rockers they laid out long tables of delicacies and then ignored them letting them go to waste.  The pain was forgotten but lived on in the subconscious.  Andrew was conceived in ’43 and popped out in ’44.  Tragic for Andy, he should have born in ’42 and been 21 in ’63.

His was a special case.  In a country in which the majority of men were US soldiers, normality had flown out the door in ’43;  his mother not unnaturally took up with one.  It was a tough time.  Andrew’s father, Andrew Loog, was a soldier from Texas. He had a wife and son back there.  As a younger man I applied my moral training to people in Andrew Loog’s situation and condemned them but now hopefully wiser and certainly older I understand.  As a soldier in an active war Andrew Loog could die at any time so why not a little happiness?  Perhaps he cringed at violating his peacetime morals.  In any event as a member of a bomber crew he didn’t even make it across the Channel just after impregnating Andrew’s mother with his future self.  Big Andy hoped he’d dodge the bullets but as it didn’t happen at least it resolved what would have been a difficult emotional situation.

Big Andy hadn’t married Little Andy’s mother so that made little Andy the  bastard son of a bigamous father.  Having been in the orphanage myself being a bastard means nothing to me.  But society is unkind to bastards and orphans.  Having read all four of Little Andy’s reminiscences more than once it seems clear that his bastardy left its mark on Andy.  He had stormy relationship with his mother, perhaps beating her frequently while in his late teens.  She said he did but he says he can’t remember doing it while it would have been wholly outside his character, however, he definitely admits booting her out of a moving car while she was pregnant.  Those temper tantrums he had!

Possibly Andrew blames his mother for bringing him into the world as a bastard.  He shouldn’t, better a bastard than not at all.  Now, Andy discusses this from different angles constantly in his memoirs so my purpose here is to try to put his mind at ease.

The war had a devastating effect on social life especially in England which was merely a staging area for US forces in those years.  Churchill was merely a stooge of Roosevelt’s.   Just as in WWI a million or English men died or were incapacitated meaning that just that many women were condemned to spinsterhood or whatever.  Oh, I know that the dyke Gloria Steinem said a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle but Steinem was an unnatural woman.  Andrew’s mother wasn’t.

As she gave Andy his father’s full name, that is Andrew Loog, I’m guessing that given the times and circumstances she really loved the guy so she named what surely must have been her darling Andrew, Loog, tacking on her name Oldham.  Maybe I’m sentimental, but coming from the orphanage, I find that touching.

Now, Celia Oldham, for that was her name, was a Jewish girl.  Andrew Loog I’m guessing from his name was probably of Dutch ancestry.  Probably a Protestant but possibly a Sephardic Jew.  Andy may know but I don’t.

So, here Celia Oldham is post-war  with the little tyke, Andy, and no husband or father for his child.  There is a massive shortage of men after the GIs clear out so while Celia is attractive the mating pool is small.  Celia did the next best thing and probably with Andy in mind did it well; she became the mistress of a wealthy man while including Andy in the equation.  Not only was he wealthy he was a decent man who maintained her and Andy as a second family.  No kidding.  He kept them in relative style while putting Andy through the public schools. (Public is private in England.)

What more could a single mother with no prospects do?  Perhaps Andrew’s schoolmates were typical louts and ragged him continuously for being a bastard.  I know that in the orphanage during and after was hell on wheels but that was the hand that was dealt and I had to play it; four deuces, trey high.  Could have been worse.  I’m not saying my psychology wasn’t affected and as Andy tells it his sure as hell was.

My point is that life being what it is he should be grateful for a loving mother who made the very best of a bad situation.

-III-

Lost In The Ozone Without A Parachute

As noted Celia Oldham was Jewish and while Andrew says that the religion didn’t play a big part in their lives nevertheless the mother is the culture bearer.  The culture she passed on to Andrew must have been Jewish.

Judaism is an identitarian faith.  To be Jewish is to separate oneself from the ‘gentiles’, from all others, the rest of mankind.  As the US Zionist Samuel Untermyer was to proclaim on nationwide radio in opposition to Hitler’s claim that the Germans were the master race:  We, the Jews, are the aristocrats of the earth.  In other words, Drop this master race crap because you ain’t it.

Thus in a country nominally English, as Andrew describes his youth it was lived in an entirely Jewish community.  As he describes it he associated with no one who wasn’t Jewish.  Like the Jewish Bob Dylan he is always surrounded by Jews.  As he set out to find his way in life he chose the record business as his métier.  I think Andrew wanted to be where it was happening and as his antennae flickered about sensing for that taste of honey he perceived that his future lay in records.  The entire music business if not the entertainment business was in the control of his fellow Jews.

Andy took his sense of reality from movies.  There are a couple influential films he refers to frequently.  One is the American film The Sweet Smell Of Success which however is about two Jews, the one based on the newspaper columnist Walter Winchell and the other his sidekick and the other is the British film Espresso Bongo.  Naturally I obtained both movies and have checked them out.  Also naturally at this age and distance I do not see them through nineteen year old eyes.

In Sweet Smell Andrew concentrates on the character Sidney Falco played by Tony Curtis.  Andy identifies with Falco as a hustler in US terms and a Wide Boy in English terms.  Thus Andrew identifies himself as a Wide Boy.  Falco was an unsavory character, a stooge of his boss J.J. Hunsecker played by the repulsive Burt Lancaster.  Curtis played the role well.  One laments Andrew’s fascination with the character.

Espresso Bongo is a pretty decent rock film.  It takes place I believe at the actual legendary 2i coffee house in which English rock was centered.  The film puts you back in the day.  The star is Andy’s all time hero Laurence Harvey who also turns in a stellar role.  Harvey has that downtrodden hang dog look that carried David Janssen through the US The Fugitive TV series so well.  As I lived in a constant depression until I was forty I knew the look and it suited me well.  I identified with both Janssen and Harvey.  Harvey was one of my favorite actors too.  Depression and Laurence Harvey go together

In Espresso Bongo Harvey plays a role of a hapless manager of a singer who gets away from him much as Andrew himself would let the Stones slip away from him.

All the managers were Jewish and all exploited their ‘boys.’  Perhaps the most famous of these, what the English amusingly call manipulators, was Larry Parnes.  As England emerged from rationing in the fifties and the rebuilding of the infrastructure destroyed by the bombing of WWII created a sort of false prosperity those young people who survived the bombing and rationing were coming of age.  The war had caused a generational break.  Young England began creating an England in their own image.  They rejected the pre-war England of their elders.  It was a world they never made.  Of course neither had their elders.

Parnes sensing the direction began creating an image of recording stars to gratify youthful yearnings, especially of young girls.  He found god looking boys giving them great stage names such Georgie Fame, Billy Fury, Tommy Steele, Marty Wilde, Vince Eager and my favorite, Lance Fortune.  There can be but little question that he exploited, not to say cheated, his ‘boys.’  Parnes was both Jewish and homosexual, a killer combination that dominated the industry.

For instance this about Vince Eager from the Widipedia entry for Larry Parnes:

Vince Eager began to wonder why he had never received any record royalties.  ‘You’re not entitled to any.’  Larry Parnes told him.  ‘But it says in my contract that I am.’  Eager protested.  ‘It also says I have power of attorney over you, and I’ve decided you’re not getting any.’  Parnes replied.

Parnes was of course both Jewish and homosexual.  As he had many of these performers on salary he was cleaning up.  Of course he had merely plucked them off the streets and set them up designing their acts, teaching them stage presence, choosing repertoires etc., they may have been little more than employees.  However they did have ‘contracts’ although as the above quote indicates they were more than one sided making the contractees little more than slaves

The whole record scene was exploitative and homosexual.  When London’s leading criminals horned in on the record scene, the Kray brothers, Reg and Ron they were Jewish and homosexual while their older brother Charlie who was straight with no police record managed the business end of the record racket.

As Andrew was coming up through the years this was the situation he perceived.  While he couldn’t have broken into the Parnes style star system once the Beatles hit and the emphasis switched to groups an opening appeared.  Parnes who had his star system going disdained the group thing leaving that open so that the Beatles manager Brian Epstein slid through the opening developing his group and star roster dislodging Parnes.

The market had expanded exponentially since the fifties when Parnes developed his system.  Andrew, then, aquiver with the possibilities had his eye out for the new Beatles.  He was told about the group working in Richmond called The Rollin’ Stones.  He went, he saw, he signed.

-IV-

As Andrew freely acknowledges by his late teens he was experiencing mental problems so I am merely discussing what he has disclosed.  He says he was suffering from manic depression.  Probably so, but he must also have blended in a little schizophrenia.  The stresses of his childhood were taking possession of his mind.  I know whereof I speak.  This combined with his disastrous choices of role models that would be joined in 1962 by his reading of Anthony Burgess’ A Clockwork Orange issued that year made him something of a phenom.  Burgess, there’s another sicko.

A Clockwork Orange  Boy, there was a Satanic book if there ever was one.  The book took a certain mentality by storm, organized it and gave it expression.  Its history is intimately connected with Jagger and Richards.

As influential in its limited sphere as the book was, Stanley Kubrick’s 1971 movie was perhaps the most destructive Satanic movie ever produced.  It set the tone for the years that followed.  The movie just tore a certain type of mind apart; Alexes by the dozen, nay, hundreds, thousands moved roved out every night after it was shown, snatching girls off the street.  Clockwork was seconded by the movie The Collector that appeared about the same time.  The book of Clockwork was less powerful but would still influence Andrew and through him Jagger and Richards.  The other Stones led separate lives not involved with Mick, Keith and Andrew’s antics.

So Andrew’s brain is in a complete turmoil as he tries to find his way through the maze of life.  Influenced by the real Larry Parnes and the fictional Johnny Jackson for a modus operandus he went in search of an act to manage and found his way to The Rolling Stones.  Having discovered his mother lode, having a clear vision of what to do he was stymied by being only nineteen in shark infested waters without a cage.

Short of twenty-one he had to team up with a shark.  As he was renting an office from an inoffensive appearing shark, Eric Easton, he convinced Eric to essentially through himself represent the Stones.  Eric may have been a pretty sincere stodge but he was no fool when it came to his self-interest.  He may have been close to a bottom feeder but that didn’t mean he hadn’t learned most of the tricks of the Great Whites.  The ins and outs of contracts presented no problems to him while dizzy Andy and the naïve Mick and Keith probably hadn’t considered the existence of contracts.  Give them a pen and dotted line under their name and they would sign.  But, really, it was never a fair fight.

As Pretty Boy Floyd the Outlaw is alleged by Woody Guthrie to have said:  Some will rob you with a six gun; some will use a fountain pen.  Oh boy!  Those contracts.  The advantages are all on the side of the contractors; contractees beware.  As Larry Parnes said:  I’ve also got your Power Of Attorney and I say you don’t get anything.  Revoking a Power Of Attorney is simple but how many amateurs think of it.

 

But legally contracts don’t really matter unless money is involved.  There wouldn’t be a lot of money for a few years but when there was Andrew and the Stones not unsurprisingly got the bum’s rush.

Andrew’s brain was a regular pinwheel especially as in addition to his youth and mental condition he imbibed drugs freely.  If your brain’s not already a mess drugs will certainly paint it black.

Even though Andrew chose poor role models he got the drift of what had to be done to make stars of random stones.  Very few performers, they only become artists after success, know how to get from point A to point B and beyond.  That’s where the manager, if he’s any good, comes in; he recognizes the possibilities of the raw talent and nurses them through the actual birth process.  Believe me: this is worth a lot.

It is somewhat like Larry Parnes.   He sensed what the teen public wanted and rather than wait for it to come to him, he created it from the rawest material and then took more than the lion’s share or the benefits.  But then, he also inadvertently gave his ‘boys’ lives.  There were actual careers awaiting them after Parnes had scraped off the cream.

The question then is were the Stones too talented to fail?  I don’t think so.  Not without Andrew to shape them and point the direction anyway.  Andrew couldn’t sing or play but he could turn dross into gold not too much differently than what Larry Parnes had done with his ‘boys.’  The Stones were the evidence.

The key to the Stones’ success was when they learned to write songs.  Would they have learned to write songs if Andrew hadn’t literally forced them into it?  I would answer with a clear cut negative.  The Stones playing nothing but crappy old Chicago blues and would have sank without a trace.  In that sense Brian Jones insistence on playing ‘pure’ R&B would have led to dismal failure.  But then, maybe that is what Brian wanted.

Let me point out here that in the US all this crappy old blues stuff was unlistened to but by a very small minority.  Nor would the stuff ever have gained popularity without the English influence.  Even today very few listen to that junk.  ‘I woke up this morning, lordy, lordy…’

While Mick, Keith and Brian were boggling their minds concentrating on the ‘music’ Andrew realized that teen age girls (the Parnes influence again) weren’t going to get too enthused about grizzled old Negroes complaining about how their mama wouldn’t drop down.  Does anyone think sprightly young teenagers looking for a good time are going to wallow in anybody else’s misery?  Not likely.

So Andrew directed his ‘boys’ toward a more pop sound alienating the ever insistent ‘purist’ Brain from Mick and Keith.  Bill and Charlie were pretty much just boys in the band.

Thus faced with the overwhelming competition of the Beatles, the lovable Mop Tops, Andrew made the fatal choice of turning Mick and Keith into his criminal Droogs, taking the low road and leaving the high road to the Beatles.  Alex in A Clockwork Orange called the members of his gang Droogs.  In a sense Andrew tried to make the Stones Andrew and the Droogs.

All very well but as Andrew got a little money his brain went from a pinwheel on a stick to real fireworks where pinwheels shoot flames.  His brain was really in a whirl.  He was passing out at parties.   He became self-absorbed.  He became interested in other projects that took his time, setting the Stones more or less adrift.  His protégé Mick was no fool while being a quick learner.  Why, Mick said to himself after becoming successful should I pay all these dufuses for what I can do myself.  He couldn’t of course do it himself but it seemed like it at the time.  He slammed the door in Andrew’s face.

-V-

Where’s Strength And Wisdom When You Need It?

The four years Andrew was with the Stones could have been a couple three or four lifetimes for the changes Andrew was forced through.  Success is rightly called the bitch goddess.  You’ll never know until you’ve said hello.  The time from when he and Eric Easton signed the Stones to the time Andrew sold the Stones out to that Devil In Disguise Allen Klein nearly destroyed Andy.  Allen Klein wasn’t in that much of a disguise either.

The trajectory of Andy’s career was so rapid it was hard to follow.  It wasn’t so much that he bit off more than he could chew as that he tried to chew without biting it off.  First things first, Andrew.

Obsessed with A Clockwork Orange he moved in with Mick and Keith where he gave them lessons in Droogism.  Both were apt pupils.  This is difficult to follow but his brain captured and sensing what seems to have been the book’s importance Andrew approached Burgess to buy the movie rights.  Burgess told him the rights had already been sold but he wouldn’t tell Andy to whom.

It turns out that the rights had been sold to David Bailey the fashion photographer who had made Mick his ‘mate’ and possibly bought the rights jointly with Mick.  If so, one wonders where Mick got the money.  Sometime in 1963 the pair split with their rights to New York City to interest Andy Warhol in a film project.  This also is rather remarkable because Andy was not yet that prominent while he hadn’t made any kind of stir with his puerile movies as yet.  Somehow the rights passed to Warhol and finally to whoever acquired them to make Kubrick’s movie.

Warhol did make a film based on the book although the connection seems tenuous while not being worth watching.  More importantly Alex and his Droogs had a profound effect on members of Warhol’s group.  The group left Warhol’s atelier, the Factory, at night on their predations a la Alex and his Droogs.  I believe Bob Dylan is referring to them in this lyric from his 1965 song Desolation Row:

Now at midnight all the agents and the superhuman crew

Come out and roundup everyone that knows more than they do

Then they bring them to the [F]actory were the heart attack machine

Is strapped across their shoulders...

For some reason both Oldham and Bailey thought Mick was the perfect Alex while the Stones could be the Droogs.  It didn’t work out but Mick and Warhol bonded like superglue.  They would be very close friends until Andy died in 1987 when Mick flew to Pittsburgh for the funeral.  Not only did the Stones practice Black and Blue at Warhol’s Montauk compound but Andy did two or three covers for them most notably Sticky Fingers.  As a result of Mick and Warhol’s friendship the Stones always had the key to Greenwich Village.

So Andrew lost out on his bid for A Clockwork Orange.  But then his brain racing a mile a minute and wanting to be a record magnate he founded Immediate Records.  Not one for details Immediate stretched him pretty thin.  I know we’re talking ancient history here, or at least ancient technology, so the reader will have to let go of the present to imagine the impact of Immediate Records on the cognoscenti of the time.  I modestly include myself in that number.

Andrew was on the far edge of flamboyant; his ideal Larry Harvey who he met about this time thought him arch camp so Andy in his eye makeup and fey manners must have cut a startling figure.  A lot of people thought he was queer and not just ambiguous.  The Immediate label was an astounding pink, almost fluorescent seemingly confirming homosexual tendencies.  It got your attention but in those days you almost had to apologize for buying a record with such a label.  His covers were all good, in a class with the best and perhaps….  He signed and produced a lot of very good groups.  The label’s production values may have prevented him from having any smashes, at least I don’t remember any.

I’m sure few will remember the Nice or even have heard of them but the first Nice was a pretty good record while the members went on to greater things.  The sound wasn’t as immediate as it could have been.  I worked it in my store but couldn’t get anywhere with it.

In those days British imports were all the rage on the West Coast while US records were despised.  When I first went to England in the early seventies I was astounded to find the fans waiting for American pressings because they were thought better.  Oh, I said, how strange.  What makes them better?  In so many words they said production values.  In still other words they thought they had more immediacy.  So Andy’s Immediate records lacked immediacy.  I thought they were great anyway and they were always the first of the new releases I auditioned.

But, the devil is in the details, and Andrew wasn’t much on details so he went broke although he did hang in there until 1970.  Not a bad record for an independent.    He doesn’t tell us what happened to the masters but they must have been worth something.

By that time Andy was not only deep into drugs he was legendary.  In Stoned and 2Stoned he has some great descriptions of being out of it if you like that sort of thing.  His first two books were based on the oral biography method of Jean Stein’s biography of Edie Sedgwick called Edie.  In that book acquaintances were interviewed and then cut and pasted to form a continuous narrative.  Knocked out by ‘Edie’ Andrew did the same with the exception that he commented on the interviewees’ comments.

Rolling Stoned begins in a straight autobiographical style then begins to wander and meander.  Andrew is always a good read but unless you want to read three different four hundred page books covering the same ground with variations I would recommend his most recent, Rolling Stoned, or perhaps 2Stoned.  Still, I don’t mind…