The European Holocaust
Part 5b
by
R.E. Prindle
The Night Has A Thousand Eyes
It was not
until the 1936 election that Roosevelt moved the inauguration from March to
January; thus the usual lapse of five months from election to inauguration was
reduced to two. It is also frequently
said that Roosevelt and his cohorts had devised no plan of action before his
inauguration. That can’t be true. As the Roosevelt administration was a
continuation of the Wilson Administration
it must have known exactly what was intended if the details were
somewhat nebulous. Besides Roosevelt had
little intellect; as Huey Long said of him:
Roosevelt ain’t smart. As FDR’s
ambassador to the Soviet Union, William Bullitt said of him he hoped Stalin could be persuaded to
follow his scheme of things. FDR was a
man of hope not thought.
The plan of
action had been devised as early as 1914 from the Communist angle and from the
Jewish angle perhaps millennia. The
famed American historian Charles Beard tells of an incident that outlines the
conspiracy dated from 1914 and then ridicules the investigator and deriding his account in the usual fashion
in his account of Roosevelt’s administration from 1933 to 1939, America In
Mid-Passage. The account is told from
the typical Liberal point of view but, then, Beard was there so it is a
firsthand account of how things appeared to him. The story will be an adequate lead in to this
period.
During the
twenties the Republicans had pursued the notion of limiting naval
armaments. A number of treaties had been
agreed upon between the naval powers to limit the size of fleets. President Hoover carried this further.
Quotes from
Beard’s America In Mid-Passage are in quotation marks, pp. 384-380:
‘…in 1929
President Hoover…sought to extend to naval auxiliaries the principle of
limitation that had been applied to capital ships at the Washington
conference. Immediately large ship
building interests were involved, and, if it had not been for a strange
incident they might have successfully managed their lobbying behind the
scenes.’
The
shipbuilders had employed William Shearer to attend the Geneva conferences, to
influence it in their wishes. They
failed, however in their payments to Shearer, who then sued for what he thought
he had coming. This brought his
situation to the Congressmen who investigated the shipbuilders.
‘See a
pamphlet bearing the title, The Cloak Of Benedict Arnold, Mr. Shearer had named
names and classified advocates of peace and naval limitations. He did not exactly call them “traitors” but
the implication needed no comment. Under
Mr. Shearer’s philosophy “our country was betrayed by Charles Evans Hughes”; and Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler and Secretary
Frank Kellogg were almost as wicked. Not
all opponents, Mr. Shearer generously conceded were communists or traitors;
some had been merely deluded or misinformed- victims of foreign propaganda.’
Thus from
the other side of the debate which was shared by the way by that big Navy man,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He reversed
the policy upon election. But, Shearer
in his investigations discovered a conspiracy that Charles Beard seems to find
preposterous but he reports it thusly:
‘According
to the version of Mr. Shearer…at the very heart of the opposition to naval and
merchant marine expansion was a deliberate conspiracy fomented by sinister
foreign powers.
“From
October 1914,” he declared, “the weight of internationalism and communism was
developed, the members of which, pacifist, defeatist, radicals of many hues and
foreign agents, communists, IWW, and socialists, included in the merger, and a
dozen or more organizations with impressive names designed to fool patriotic
Americans and lend aid to the enemy.
Associated with these agents and these organizations of these
anti-American bodies were statesmen, Senators, bankers, lawyers, actors,
directors, and writers, men and women of American birth who were used to fight
the existing government of the United States….All names, records, checks from
prominent people in this country, instructions from Moscow, speeches, theses,
questionnaires, indeed the workings of the underground organizations, working
through secret bodies in labor circles, in society, in professional groups, in
the Army, the Navy, in Congress, in the schools and colleges of the country, in
the banks business concerns, among the farmers, in the motion picture industry,
in fact, in nearly every walk of life- this information and authentic
documentary proof of a colossal conspiracy against the United States were
seized by federal officers and are in the possession of the authorities.’
Shades of
Joe McCarthy! Could it be true nearly
forty years before Big Joe revealed that colossal conspiracy? Beard seems to find Shearer’s researches
incredible, indeed, risible but could dozens of independent researchers coming
to the same conclusions all be nuts, ‘conspiracy theorists’? These researchers were at least as
intelligent and objective as Beard and his fellows. While it is possible, indeed probable, that
one can’t see what is in front of one’s face, I know the shock of finding
everything I had been taught to believe was less than the truth was a difficult
adjustment to make for myself.
Apparently Beard was not prepared to make the leap.
However
Beard is writing in 1939 after six years of the Roosevelt administration. The proof of Shearer’s accusations was made
evident in 1933 when hundreds of these American conspirators followed FDR into
Washington assuming important positions in his administration. Shearer’s accusations were corroborated by
numerous other researchers and even novelists of the period. The proof that had been seized and was in the
possession of the authorities was seized by none other than the much maligned
Attorney General of Woodrow Wilson, A. Mitchell Palmer. In the meantime J. Edgar Hoover investigating
just these people had already amassed a huge number of files.
H.G. Wells
had even written a book in which he describes the situation as The Open
Conspiracy. Open means everyone can see
it unaided. The only thing anyone failed
to see was that nationalism was actually dead the war had shifted to one of
ideology. It was Communism vs.
‘Capitalism.’ All these people and
organizations Mr. Shearer names opposing the US, that is Capitalism, were
Communists, socialists, fellow travelers and what have you. As Fellow Travelers, Parlor Pinks, Liberals
et al., they had infiltrated every facet of America, indeed, Western life,
where they remained disguised, dissembling because as yet the ‘Capitalists’
were the stronger party. The American
side of the revolution had been crushed in 1919, no reason to expose themselves
to that humiliation again. Had they
exposed themselves they would have been immediately discredited, possibly
losing their jobs, much as exposed ‘racists’ do today, now that the Reds are in
power. Of course, they lurked in the
shadows defending borderline Reds with American virtues such as freedom of
speech that they are doing their best to cancel today.
When
Roosevelt entered DC with his big bass drum the legions he had been cultivating
rushed into the New Altruria with him.
Louis Brandeis and his man Felix Frankfurter, Bernard Baruch, Sidney
Hillman and a host of others experienced and very competent and they all wanted
to exterminate the Germans. Having
gained experience in WWI they were prepared to more effectively use their
experience in WWII and everybody knew war was coming and they may have known
when if not the exact date.
Once in
power Roosevelt behaved as a conqueror eager to punish the vanquished much as
the North had triumphed over the South after the Civil War and as the Soviets
and Americans would do in the wake of the German conquest. Indeed, Roosevelt probably treated his
potential sixteen or twenty years in power as a period of the Reconstruction of
the United States along socialist lines.
Call the thing Collectivism.
Individualism was a thing of the past, now came a period the
Collectivists called Co-operation.
During the
entire period from 1914 to 1945 a state of war existed between the two states of
mind. The first few months of the
Roosevelt administration were tumultuous beyond belief. Roosevelt asked or demanded that Congress
give him full dictatorial powers to deal with the ‘emergency.’ Thus there was little or no difference
between himself, Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini.
Indeed his
1936 inauguration was a full military review that had little or no difference
between the great military parades and reviews of the other totalitarian
powers. It isn’t that it wasn’t seen for
what it was but that Roosevelt as with Obama treated his opponents as ‘domestic
terrorists.’ They were allowed no
voice. Thus he began an assault on his
predecessors who he designated as ‘economic royalists’, that is, kings. Of course the American Revolution was fought
to remove kingship from Earth. The
English Revolution was fought against the absolutist Stuarts, Charles I, the
subsequent Glorious Revolution removed the absolutist Stuart James II replacing
him with a constitutional monarch. The
French Revolution gave the coup de grace to the absolutist Louis XVI so what
Roosevelt was doing was identifying himself as a revolutionist against royal
authority.
He, then, in
the character of a Robespierre arraigned the ‘economic royalists; in a show
trial, preceding Stalin, or a kangaroo court in which it was demanded that the
victims confess their guilt and take their ‘well merited’ punishment. Not unlike the Nazi war ‘criminals.’ Of course this was not the Soviet Union or
Germany where a Hitler or Stalin while not having absolute power nevertheless
could manipulate their constitutions and laws to do as they pleased. They could use the governmental apparatus to
kill whom they chose, imprisonment with no habeas corpus, or condemn their
victims to certain death in prison camps.
Roosevelt
did try to convict and imprison the Republican Secretary of the Treasury,
Andrew Mellon who was in office during what Beard calls the Golden Glow
period. He viciously interrogated
numerous ‘royalists’ before Congressional committees and even had the younger
J.P. Morgan photographed with a dwarf sitting on his knee as some kind of weird
humiliation.
Later in his
administration attempts were made to financially destroy his adversaries such
as Henry Ford and WR Hearst while a continuous vile character assassination was
waged against ex-president Herbert Hoover.
Roosevelt was not a nice man.
There is
always the question of how much his polio attack and subsequent recovery may
have unbalanced his mind. Certainly the
contrast between his eminent position and incapacitated physique must have
offended his amour propre. According to
ancient usage Roosevelt should never have been in authority. From time immemorial no man with a physical
defect of any kind could be king. Even
so much as a facial scar disqualified a man as ruler. As a paraplegic without the use of his legs
Roosevelt was definitely disqualified as he knew since he went to great lengths
to conceal his defect. There were
apparently many voters who never knew of his paralyzed legs.
His defect
did offend many who insisted on pointing out his infirmity because they didn’t
want to be ruled by an imperfect ruler.
This attitude may seem rude but old traditions die hard.
FDR’s
administration was a reincarnation of the Wilson administration with a great
many of the Wilson men returning to power after the hateful twelve year hiatus
of Beard’s Golden Glow. The New Era,
Coolidge Prosperity, Normalcy or anyone of the names this rich era of history
was known by. The governance by the
‘economic royalists.’
Bernard
Baruch returned. Brandeis with his
acolyte Felix Frankfurter and his cadre of ‘Happy Hot Dogs’ returned. Numerous Settlement House people including
Harry Hopkins and Frances Perkins, the hatchet man Harold Ickes, whatever he
was.
The people who
helped Roosevelt to office were either driven away by these hardline Wilsonians
or disappointed by Roosevelt they left embittered and reviling the man.
Perhaps one
of the most telling incidents that revealed Roosevelt for who he thought he was
is told by Charles Beard in his America In Mid-Passage. His 1936 inauguration perhaps gave away his
own imperial pretensions. Beard pp.
339-340:
Far more sublime were two features of the occasion which he arranged to express his own sense of proprieties. Putting aside protests from citizens and associates pacifically inclined, he decided that a military parade not a civilian pageant, should celebrate his return to power. And he also decided that he and his immediate entourage (read: thuggish henchmen) at the White House must review the marching men, with banners and martial music, from a replica of the Hermitage, the home of Andrew Jackson, the hero of New Orleans who had worn boots and spurs in war and politics.
Perhaps this
was an indirect reference to his incapacity while Hitler must have been
justified in interpreting it as an indication of his warmongering of which he
quite justly accused Roosevelt. As the
religious and war leader of the Internationalist brigade FDR was a crusader
against the The Children Of Darkness, the ‘aggressor nations’. Of course as a justified sinner along with
his Jewish cohorts FDR was merely executing the will of God on Earth as it was
in heaven. God himself had kicked
Lucifer out through the Pearly Gates.
The incredible genocide FDR unleashed on Germany required no qualms of
conscience. After all knowing the will
of Our Father it was impossible for him to ever do wrong. No matter how heinous his crimes they were
the will of God in his mind.
Congress,
well aware of his martial ambitions, had tried to rein him in by passing the
strict neutrality act of 1935. Only two
years after his inauguration they realized the direction in which he was
heading. FDR would shred any such
legislation in the next few years as he activated a propaganda machine meant to
inspire We the People with martial ardor and the proper crusading spirit to lay
down our son’s lives.
A lot of
lessons had been learned in the decade or so from the end of the last war. The
prospects of gaining absolute control through another war were enticing. For instance the German properties that were
confiscated during the late war were given back; in this new war well prepared
with superb planning billions would be confiscated by the Alien Properties
Agency and given away to his fellow Chicago Jews by the Alien Properties
Custodian David Bazelon. The theft from
both Germany and the US conquerors was complete and nearly total.
Also under cover
of the most destructive war in history Roosevelt would complete the League of
Nations idea with his own concept of the United Nations. This time there would be no debating, no
argument. The job was done by war’s end
and presented as a fait accompli to the Congress and American people. As much a fantasy as the League of Nations,
actually more so, the United Nations has done nothing to end wars and establish
peace. It has merely destroyed the basis
or Western Civilization.
Under the
aegis of the UN the world has been at uninterrupted war for seventy years. Nice job Frank.
By their own
admission the administration was unable to relieve the Depression.
‘We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it has not worked….We have never made good on our promises….I say after eight years of the this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started….And an enormous debt to boot.’
(Quoted from
the Morgenthau diary of 5/8/38 by Fulton W. Folsom Jr through James Duffy:
Lindbergh And Roosevelt, MJF Books, 2010, p. 120)
So, as the war began in Europe Roosevelt had done nothing to successfully relieve the economic situation, in point of fact he had worsened it by incurring tens of billions of debt distributing it to CCC camps, Federal Arts projects and whatever to no effect. What he had done, his real intent, was to strip Americans of their self-respect as they lived on a dole of one sort or another.
In 1932-33
Stalin had created an artificial famine in the Soviet Union that starved
millions and millions of Ukrainians to death.
This was obviously Jewish vengeance for the Chielmiecke Massacres of the
seventeenth century that were merely a part of the Ukrainian revolt against
Poland and the crimes committed against them by their Jewish auxiliaries.
Now,
Roosevelt claimed that under his administration one third of the US population
was ill fed with many people apparently starving to death at the same time as
the Ukrainian farmers. The Depression
was engineered by the same people who created the Ukrainian famine. Is one to imagine this was a coincidence
given the farm program Baruch and Sapiro were promoting that Henry Ford
opposed? I don’t think so.
The only
thing Roosevelt achieved was a collectivist crusade against the individualism
of the American Plan. As he said,
individualism is dead, this is the age of collectivism. He might have succeeded completely except for
the enormous resistance he initiated and perhaps a certain character failing.
-2-
Momentous
changes in communications had occurred in the twenties. Commercial radio had come into existence that
by the thirties had become a part of American life. Other than the auto, the radio was the most
desired American possession. Few homes
were without one. The second was the
addition of sound to movies. The silent
era was over. While it isn’t overly well
known television transmission was also developed in the thirties but the
commercial application was delayed until after WWII.
Thus these
tremendous propaganda disseminators came into the service of the
demagogues. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
was the Demagogue in Chief. He either
knew how to use these new technological wonders or someone showed him how to do
it. Actually as an interesting fact, Herbert
Hoover had used the radio first during his administration. The Republicans were responsible for creating
the environment for radio.
Concurrent
with the rise of radio and the talkies was the rise of the master propagandists
who Beard points out were referred to as ‘Public Relations’ experts. A chief
among these was the very Jewish Eddie Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund
Freud. You may be sure that at least
behind the scenes he was influential on the direction of Roosevelt’s Public
Relations.
Roosevelt needed
them because reaction to his efforts to reconstruct the US along socialist
lines was fierce and enormous. In
upsetting the psychological balance of the country he released numerous
advocates of phantasmic schemes and political notions as controversial as his
own.
Roosevelt
must have wowed them with his ’33 inaugural speech because certain powerful men
in command of their own powerful propaganda tools were initially proponents of
his presidency falling away rather rapidly.
Among these were Charles Coughlin the radio priest, W.R. Hearst the
press magnate, and Huey Long of Louisiana and his Share The Wealth
program. All three backed Roosevelt’s
election then disappointed by his programs bailed.
Roosevelt
was never tolerant or forgiving so that as the virtual if not real dictator of
the US, little different from Hitler and Stalin it was dangerous to oppose
him. Long met his death, Coughlin was
silenced and Hearst was financially ruined through taxation. Roosevelt was relentless in his hatreds. While there was no reason for him to hate
Ford, yet because of the Jewish hatred of Ford, FDR was directed to force Ford
to the wall through legislation both before and during the war. For all practical purposes Ford Motors was
bankrupt by war’s end.
Of course,
this aspect of Roosevelt’s methods and personality were concealed by the
avuncular persona he perfected and projected over the radio in his ‘Fireside
Chats.’ The Fireside chat was a
brilliant public relations innovation.
Of course FDR did not write the chats, those were prepared for him by
others while he merely mouthed the words.
Nor is it
likely that he had much of a hand in their preparation. While the general direction of his
administration’s policies were set it would hardly have been possible for him even
to take the time to make the broadcasts.
This stuff was carefully planned.
A president is a busy man with a world of cares so that focusing on
‘chats’, bringing your mind to bear on the propaganda is nearly impossible.
He was in
the hands of his writers. These writers
were by and large Jewish therefore pushing a Jewish agenda. The number one item on the Jewish agenda was
winning their war with Germany and that could only be done with goi
manpower. Roosevelt had charged the war
on Germany as the chief of the aggressor nations on his election. He began preparing the US for war in 1933 on
his election. Without a doubt he was the
aggressor constantly urging the country to accept his view of Germany. This was very evident, so evident that
Congress pushed through a strict neutrality act as early as 1935. So evident that Hitler repeatedly referred to
FDR as a warmonger unwilling to listen to peaceful overtures.
Peace to FDR
meant acquiescence to his terms or war.
My way or the highway. This was
true both in the East as in the West. It
was so evident that the country repeatedly repudiated his efforts to lead the
US into war. The war fever of Washington
was evident not just to a few but the many.
This was well before the war began.
Harold Ickes in his memoir says that war was decided on in 1933. Thus the administration must have known the
goal to which they were straining. This
includes General George Marshall.
Charles
Beard writes of it as fact in his America In Mid-Passage. Roosevelt even propagandized the war albeit
in covert ways, or at least ways that he could distance himself from. Technology had increased the ways this could
be discretely done. Print technology,
books, magazines and newspapers were effective; radio, talkies and a new medium
that came of age in 1938 with the introduction of Superman; comic books came of
age with that super hero. The psyche and
mores of the US were thereby changed.
The comic books were almost entirely the production of the Jewish mind,
not the American mind but, the Jewish mind.
Following on the heels of Superman came Batman and after the Caped
Crusader (note the word) came the ultimate Jewish super hero, Captain
America. The first cover of Captain
America published before the war showed Capt. America knocking Hitler for a
loop.
After the
war began a whole flotilla of comics with war heroes and themes were
introduced. The comic books were
extremely effective propaganda tools then and they remain so now, still
completely in Jewish hands.
While Roosevelt
himself undoubtedly had nothing to do with comic book publishers, writers and
artists it is equally certain that Jewish members of his administration did, so
that print, radio, movies and comic books were undoubtedly coordinated. Serials of many of the wartime super heroes
can be rented over cable for viewing.
Roosevelt’s
opponents immediately after his election were depicted as Fascists and tools of
the Nazis. This alone shows the
overwhelming Jewish influence. Roosevelt
himself was obsessed with the notion of depicting his chief enemies Lindbergh
and Ford as undoubted Nazis while a tremendous smear campaign, character
assassination, was carried on against them.
It would
have to be impossible that any government would not use the movies for propaganda
purposes. Indeed, the movies became an
extension of government policies. For
the Roosevelt government and its defenders to deny that the movies were not
used for propaganda purposes is an absurdity not worth considering. Beard’s Mid-Passage published in 1939 before
the war even began notes the manner in which Roosevelt subordinated the film
industry to promote pro-war films in the effort to get America to endorse a war
against Germany.
Roosevelt
would have been only one party interested in using Hollywood for propaganda
purposes. You may be sure that Stalin
through his agents were also using Hollywood to follow the Moscow line
Of course,
at the time, and even now, any propaganda influence is denied. Yet, per Charles Beard there were studies
being conducted pre-war that showed the influence and its degree. The influence was clear to Beard and I’m sure
Hitler and Stalin had no difficulty seeing it.
The
obfuscation of the Left denying propaganda in film can be lightly brushed
aside. It isn’t even worth discussing.
While
Roosevelt was a dictator on a par with Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin the
historical mores of the country limited his ability to exercise his mere will
as did the mores of the other combatants control theirs. Hitler and Mussolini simply removed the
Jewish influence or ignored it while in the US and USSR Jewish influences were
paramount.
The reaction
to Roosevelt once his direction became clear was enormous. The ‘economic royalists’ did not stand idly
by but organized groups such as the Liberty League offered vocal but meager
resistance. Of course the Liberty League
was led by a Jew. A few such as Henry
Ford who also had WWI experience simply refused to go along. Rather than use overt force the
administration employed slander and sabotage.
Another big
weapon was expropriatory taxation.
Incensed that there were a few hundred or two hundred million dollar
fortunes in the US the Liberal response was to steal it- that is tax it out of
existence. As this would have or did
have no effect on the fortunes of the Common Man, there were no distributions,
the only reason for stealing the money must have been envy.
Actually the
history of the US has been one of unbearable stresses that were all
psychologically difficult or impossible to bear. To begin with the period from the Revolution
to the Civil War was primarily an agricultural and trading society with few
large fortunes, so there was a rough economic equality although, let us never
forget, there is always someone at the bottom.
Equality doesn’t mean that there is no social scale.
Thus to all
appearances under the cover of the Civil War in one jump the country went from
Longfellow’s village smithy under his spreading chestnut tree to the sprawling
steel mill of Homestead. The economy
went from no petroleum to the gigantic Standard Oil in just a few years after
the Civil War. At the war’s end it took
months maybe a year or more to go round the horn to California or the long
arduous trek across country through hostile Indian Territory. Four years after the Civil War in 1869 the
golden Spike was driven and you could travel to San Francisco with all your
possessions in baggage, yourself and family seated comfortably with no cares.
Following
Standard Oil’s example Trusts of all kinds of products sprang up like
mushrooms. It was the economic wild west
with no holds barred. Magnificent
fortunes could be had for the taking, mines, land, whole forests and
mountains. Not a lot of skill, really,
was necessary, just a whole lot of bravado.
For a certain type of person for a brief period it was his day. By 1900 that day had passed and that type of
man was passé but he had left his mark on the imagination of another type of
man whose day was in the offing.
The times
were changing as the latter type of man began to come into his day with the
election of the socialist Woodrow Wilson.
The type of men they were was made clear during the war tyranny of
1917-18.
A socialism
that would have made the Stalin gulp was clamped on the unsuspecting people of
the United States. You wonder why Henry
Ford and the Dodges resisted strongly Bernard Baruch’s dictatorship at the War
Industries Board? This was very serious
stuff.
If the
Armistice had been declared, according to Baruch himself they would have
regimented the American people as none other had been regimented before. This was evil as only Americans could do it.
You may imagine the rage with which the Wilsonians greeted the election results
of 1920 as the Republicans tried to restore the pre-Wilson America. This was the Normalcy period from 1920 to
1932 that Charles Beard refers to as the Golden Glow.
FDR was in
the Wilson government from start to finish so that he and a whole cadre of
Wilsonians stewed and plotted until they were able to continue their nefarious
course after 1932. Their memories then
were centered on the disappeared world of the Gilded Age and its Golden
Glow. They really were men and women of
the nineteenth century still under the thrall of the Village Smithy and his
chestnut tree not really dealing with the present as the path to the
future. Their minds were filled with
vengeance.
Now, in that
leap from an agricultural past to the industrial present from the small artisan
to the giant corporation people’s minds were seized with terror by bigness. There was nothing to fear but small
minds. Looking back they fondly
remembered a time that scarcely resembled their memory but was small and
compact and seemingly unthreatening although they should have read Poe’s
Diddling As A Fine Art more carefully.
Had they
been able to see ahead they would have realized that the small semi-isolated
communities were a thing of the past while in the coming gigantic global
economy a giant size would be necessary to succeed as the global economy grew
and other peoples began to participate in what was really a Euroamerican
monopoly. Standard Oil would have to be
big to compete with the monstrously sized Chinese demand. Today President Obama is busy cutting it down
to an uncompetitive size.
Rockefeller
was a great mind that perhaps gazed into the future. The times called for a great people to seize
the future but the transition from the Village Smithy to Homestead had been too
quick; the times were big but the people were small. In their fear and trepidation they smashed
the bigness and thus while not apparent at the time, condemned America to
second or third rate status. The men of
Roosevelt’s administration were of that small minded kind. They didn’t understand, hence unknowingly
worked to enthrone the Chinese. They
were natural born slaves if there ever were any.
The second
problem and perhaps the most infuriating for Roosevelt and his ilk was the
great wealth accumulated by the magnates of the Gilded Age, for big money goes
with big business. Currency and specie
had always been a problem in the early stages of settlement. There just wasn’t enough money to go around
so the people of Roosevelt’s school conceived of the money supply as
essentially a round pie of which the Golden Agers were hogging all but a few small
thin slices. Hence you have the repeated
notion that, say, twenty percent of the rich owned eighty percent of the pie
leaving only twenty percent of pie for the remaining eighty percent of people. Theirs was a small static world.
Conceiving
the notion that this eighty percent of the pie was stolen thus forcing the
eighty percent who thought poor to live in what was really astounding luxury it
seemed right for the eighty percent to steal the money back- in theory.
America had
never developed a realistic understanding of monetary matters so there was no
understanding of the creation of wealth, still isn’t. In point of fact if the Age had depended on
existing currency there would never have been a Union Pacific, Carnegie Steel
or Standard Oil. There was not enough
money so that the builders had to find ways and in creating value the money
supply expanded, or was allowed to expand to include the newly created
wealth. Things were getting bigger.
Prior to
1865 there were very few millionaires, the number increased dramatically after
1865 and by the time of the New Deal there were thousands of millionaires. Even during the depression the US was richer
than it had ever been. A mere thirty or
forty years after the New Deal millionaires
would be a dime a dozen. In our
time nearly anyone who owns a house is a millionaire.
It was also
true that fortunes didn’t last. What one
generation accumulated subsequent generations dissipated. It was sure as clockwork. There was no entail or primogeniture so that
as subsequent generations multiplied the number of inheritors grew with it.
A leading
expositor of the narrow minded economic view was the very small minded Jewish
writer Gustavus Myers whose most
influential book was The History Of The Great American Fortunes. As may be expected Myers roundly condemned
the Gilded Age and The Golden Glow, the latter also known as Normalcy, the New
Era, the Coolidge Prosperity and the Republican Interregnum.
Myers wrote
several other books condemning American mores and finances. For those interested I have discussed his
writing in my post Chumps Playing Stud.
Myers went as far as calling for legislation to prevent future
accumulations of great fortunes. As he
said his school had their man in place with FDR.
Myers was
not complaining about great fortunes in general. The key phrase in his history of American
fortunes is American Fortunes, that is, Anglo-Saxon fortunes. If one reads his book one will find almost no
reference to Jews or Jewish fortunes. It
is as if there were no Jews in the US, and Myers obviously was a Jew. The Jewish scalawags, the Seligman’s who
reaped an immense fortune in government securities during the Civil War are no
where mentioned nor the fact that they snared great fortunes by taking General
Motors from Billy Durant. The even
greater Guggenheim fortune acquired from appropriating the metal resources of
the country also receive no mention.
Kuhn-Loeb was apparently unknown to Myers.
Thus the
Roosevelt administration used the taxing authority of the government to
expropriate the Anglo-Saxon fortunes, destroying the heritage of the Gilded Age
the members of which they considered actual enemies of the people.
Thus the
small minded people destroyed the ability of the US to compete on the world
stage. Today the US has slipped behind China
as the most successful country while India is panting close behind.
And then, a
strange thing happened. Of course after
the Nazis assuming control in Germany in 1933 the Gilded Age people were
grouped together as Fascists since in self-defense they opposed the so-called
New Deal, called the Raw Deal by some.
However if
the Gilded Agers weren’t responsible for the magnificent entity that the US had
become, who was? Why, who else but the
Jews?
As the
thirties came to an end and opposition to the US entry in the European war
jelled it became necessary for Roosevelt to destroy the opposition much as
Stalin had destroyed his because the US was going to war no matter who
dissented. The Great Crusade against the
‘aggressor nations’ was on. In such a
situation it was necessary to designate the chief spokesman of the enemy and
discredit him. Hoover was out of reach,
Hearst had already been destroyed, Ford was quiescent but stepping into the
breach was an old bete noir of Roosevelt’s, Charles A. Lindbergh.
This is a
strange story.
FDR seems to
have had a strong aversion to Lindbergh dating back possibly to 1927 but that
is speculative. Of more recent
occurrence was the issue of the air mail service cancellation of 1933. At that time the Roosevelt was convinced that
the civilian air mail contracts had been fraudulently obtained. It is also true that Hoover developed the air
mail program as Secretary of Commerce under Coolidge so there may have been
envy over that in Roosevelt’s tiny mind.
At any rate he cancelled the ‘sacred’ contracts and ordered Army pilots
to fly the mail. A pilot is a pilot is a
pilot, right?
Flying at
that time was much more hazardous so that the Army pilots who had no experience
in flying at night or in inclement weather were not successful. The Army was botching the job while a
significant number of pilots died in crashes.
As you read American history life was really cheap back then, thousands
and thousands of people were killed every year.
Nobody seemed to care.
Lindbergh
took it upon himself to write an open letter to FDR imploring him to reinstate
civilian delivery. Roosevelt was forced
to back down while being reported to have said:
We’ll get that fair haired boy.
That threat implies resentment of Lindbergh going way back to his
trans-Atlantic solo flight of ’27.
So, when
Lindbergh came out condemning any attempt to get the US into another European
war thus frustrating FDR’s attempt to do just that FDR decided to destroy
him. What else would he do in the
environment he was creating but call him a Nazi. Thus the major defamation campaign was on.
Strangely
this played into Jewish hands. At the
risk of repetition let me point out again that the Jews operated as an
independent semi-autonomous people. They
used the US government in an attempt to realize their independent agenda that
was completely different than that of Americans.
Events in
Germany had alarmed the Jews although there could have been no premonition of
the course events would take while as Americans they should have had little
interest in Europeans. However perhaps
as Ford insisted Jews were natural born internationalists. Rather than attribute the German events to
their own actions it was thought that non-Jews left to their own devices were
irrational and always a potential threat.
Building on
psychological discoveries of the nineteenth century then, current understanding
of psychological processes were much advanced.
The brutal manipulation of the American psyche by George Creel’s
Committee of Public Information of WWI had shown how far and how easily the
mass psyche could be pushed.
Subsequent
developments in propaganda by the Public Relations experts had shown how far
clever manipulation of symbols could go.
Thus, as Eddie Bernays the leading Jewish Public Relations propagandist
explained it a superior elite had to take it upon themselves to guide public
sentiment in the direction to take to
make sure there were no ‘irrational’ outbreaks such as those in Germany. There was always an acute danger it could
happen here unless the elite, that is the Jews, managed the national psyche.
Bernays was
a nephew of Sigmund Freud who had spent time with that master propagandist and
was in as close contact with him as circumstances allowed. Thus Bernays and his fellow Jews began to
develop propaganda techniques accordingly.
Seizing upon
Roosevelt’s hatred of Lindbergh they began to arouse fears of a Nazi takeover
of the US. Now, the thirties according
to the Jewish yearbook had the least ‘anti-Semitic’ activity of any decade in
US history. This seems odd as the Jews
place such emphasis on Henry Ford’s writing all through the twenties. Apparantly his studies had no effect. Nevertheless the Jews attempted to impress on
the US that it could, indeed, it was happening here.
The
activities of certain cranks who posed no threat were give exaggerated
publicity. One such was William Dudley Pelley
and his Silver Shirts an outfit that was so small and disorganized that he and
it posed no threat. Another absurdity
given undue attention was a man called, if you can believe this, James True and
his ‘kike killer.’ He turned out to be a
‘lone wolf’ sitting around his office giving out interviews while flashing his
‘kike killer’ that turned out to be an ordinary black jack. Probably a Jewish stooge and if so a good
joke.
No one was
going to get far with a couple of acts like that as a real star was
needed. Lindbergh was it. Talk about star quality. He was a household
name and while an American champion, with the right defamatory propaganda, he
could be made the butt of a defamatory campaign. He was quickly built up to an insane
Isolationist who was not only sympathetic to the Nazis but a Nazi stooge. The connections were developed into the idea
that he was a Nazi satrap who was going to run for President and once in was
going to turn the country over to Hitler.
The idea itself was crazy but how’s that for a fearsome prospect. Like Roosevelt said, we have nothing to fear
but fear itself. I suppose that meant we
were supposed to go looking for it.
I don’t know
how seriously this absurd scenario was taken but a movie called Keeper Of The
Flame based on the notion was made, so, Roosevelt was seriously using films to
press his agenda. The notion was so important
to Jews that in The Plot Against America Philip Roth published a
semi-autobiographical novel of his youth in the Jewish colony of Newark based
on this premise.
Very
strange. The idea needs a little further
examination.
Roosevelt
and Hitler assumed their reins of power almost simultaneously. As I have pointed out German hatred was long
standing while the Nazi’s and Jews qua Communists had been engaged in street
warfare for over a decade. Hitler thus
squashed the Judeo Communists beginning in 1933 while the Jews declared a
worldwide war on Germany at the same time.
The Nazis or
Fascists were quickly equated to the Republicans and Roosevelt’s opposition
thus FDR’s opposition all became Fascists in Jewish and FDR minds- i.e. The
Children of Darkness, Satan’s henchmen, whatever. Thus the idea formed in Jewish minds that
they were the true Americans responsible for creating the beautiful American
Dream.
FDR’s
opponents were Fascists operating behind enemy lines. There had to be an arch demon leading them so
Lindbergh was selected. All hatred could
be focused on him and if he were defeated the cause was won.
This is all
perversely explained by Philip Roth in his novel The Plot Against America.
In reality
it was the Jews plotting against America but as the nineteenth century novelist
Paul Feval explains in his Black Coats series a professional criminal in
planning a crime first selects a scapegoat to bear the guilt. Once the crime is committed the evidence
points to the victim. Once he is
arrested and convicted the case is closed.
There is no need to look further.
As the criminals express it, the law has been paid and victim pays it.
Thus
Lindbergh was the scapegoat who was to pay the law for the Jewish plot against
America depicted by Roth. Seventy-five
years later it was still thought necessary to deflect suspicion from themselves. Or was the story resurrected to direct
attention from current Jewish operations?
Back in 1940
as US involvement in the European war seemed more likely the drum beat began
for the extermination of the Germans.
The war would be a genocidal war and the horrific European Holocaust
began to be tapped out.
Part
Six: The Holocaust begins follows.
The most blatant Communist film produced by Hollywood is Mission To Moscow 1943 available online in 3 parts on Dailymotion video site.Mission To Moscow is based on a book of the same name by Roosevelt's ambassador to Moscow in the 1930s. The film peddles the Stalinist line that the victims of the purges were all a fifth column working for Hitler including Trotsky himself.After the war the film disappeared down the memory hole but fortunately some copies of it were archived so we can see the strange Philip Dick universe in which The United States was once the Soviet Unions most loyal ally.Once Hollywood puts a lie out on celluloid however it can never be retracted.Another case is the Jane Fonda film Julia based on the autobiography of Communist writer Lillian Hellman.It purports to tell the true story of Hellman's involvement with an Austrian anti - Nazi resistance fighter. It turns out the story was true but Hellman never in fact met the woman who I believe successfully sued her.So in fact the film Julia is a lie from beginning to end but it is still being shown on TV with no warning about its veracity to anybody watching.But hell.what do you expect from these people, they are liars period.I have met some liars in my time and generally they prefer lying to telling the truth even when there is nothing in it for them presumably just to keep their hand in .It just seems to be a pathology with them.
ReplyDeleteRoy: I have a copy of Mission to Moscow and a vague memory of having seen the film. Real 'Oklahoma' stuff, only needed Gordon Macrae or John Raitt to sing while they drove their tractors.
ReplyDeleteApparently Stalin complained that he was getting bad press so Roosevelt not only released the movie but demanded that the press adjust their to coverage to Stalin's request for favorable treatment. The more you get into this the more bizarre it becomes. Far a good 'official' rationale of Roosevelt's relations with Stalin, William C. Bullitt FDR's first ambassador to the USSR gives a very good précis in the first chapter of his The Great Globe Itself published in '46. Even though the book has an FDR spin it will knock your socks off. Everyone who wanted to see it apparently knew what was going on.
FDR had problems with his first few ambassadors; they all told him that he was making unnecessary concessions and that Stalin wasn't that great a guy. Then he appoints Davies to take his Mission to Moscow, whatever nuances are contained in the word Mission, and come back with a better report. At any rate FDR got his subjective vision of Stalin and the USSR.
The study of this whole period is really just too strange. It's one of those things where I understand my reading but I can't believe my eyes. Oh well, on to Part Six. Won't get any less strange.