Showing posts with label Nazis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nazis. Show all posts

Thursday, September 13, 2018

Eugenics and Dysgenics Pt.2b-2, Mysteries of the Second Thirty Years War


Eugenics and Dysgenics Pt. 2b-2

Mysteries Of The Second Thirty Years War

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Continued from Pt. 2b-1

According to Lion Feuchtwanger Jud Suss’ biographer cum novelist, Suss, who was advisor to Duke Karl Alexander of the German Duchy of Wurttemberg, next to Bavarian Germany flourished in the 1730s and 40s.  In his story Feuchtwanger details how Suss swindled and corrupted Duke Karl, bedded his wife and turned her against him, raised money by taxing such necessities as the right to use public roads thereby virtually bankrupting the whole populace much as Netanyahu’s Jewish tax farmers in Spain and generally disrupting the dukedom.  In other words, Suss supplanted the Duke.  This was done through chutzpah and effrontery.  A regular textbook for the Jews and one which seems to have been followed.

The Rothschilds coming along in the footsteps of Suss through chutzpah and luck perfected the system and essentially named the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.  While the Europeans were inventing the scientific modern world the Jews were fleecing the Europeans.  Thus, out of the disappointments of the nineteenth century that weakened their religious mission and the European rise of Science in the nineteenth century the Jews lost their belief in the supernatural becoming for all intents and purposes the first atheist nation.

The nineteenth century found them floundering around trying to find the way.  Numerous religious avenues were explored fracturing the Jews into various religious sects much like Protestantism.  Suss’ directive to follow the money led them to seek control of European currency and later in the century US currency which they successfully did.  The Euroamerican banking systems were effectively in their near absolute control by 1913.

The Talmud not being a particularly religious work, the Bible, Old Testament, was very secondary to the Talmud and not very assiduously read.  Judaism then was embedded in the Talmud.  This is what Barbara Spectre of Paideia refers to as ‘Jewish knowledge’ which she places on an equal plane with European knowledge, that is, Science.  That is one particularly hard sell.

Thus, in the nineteenth century Judaism was entirely eclipsed by European Science.  The old debates between Judaism and Christianity were kaput, irrelevant.  Unable to come up with something that could equal or surpass Science the only recourse the Jews had was to inject Talmudist magic into European Science, that is, corrupt it.  This is Spectre’s goal.  By the turn of the twentieth century they had found the formula.

The change of centuries was a very important period for the Jews.  On the religious front the stage was being set to reunite them into one ideology.  That ideology was to become Zionism.  And behind this whole schemata was the rise of a new arena and power.  The United States of America.  While the rise of the US happened very, very fast from a group of wild, untutored English colonies whose first president was inaugurated in 1793, that is, the beginning of the nineteenth century, and whose domain at the time barely extended beyond the first range of mountains some hundreds of miles  even from the Mississippi and yet a mere hundred years later extended from the Atlantic Coast to the Pacific Ocean and through the choice latitudes of the continent.  Further it was a country of unexampled prosperity with no settled social mores, ripe for the picking.

It was as though the heavens had opened up and fulfilled Jewish hopes and desires.  As the nineteenth century had begun Napoleon had conquered all Europe save Russia with which he had an accommodation.  Napoleon, in an attempt in which he would later would be joined by Henry Ford and many others trying to find a solution to the Jewish problem, emancipated the European Jews.  As their complaint was that they were discriminated against, and with good reason, Napoleon attempted to remove the cause of that discrimination.  In his fatuousness, he misunderstood the Jewish attitude.  He thought that since the gates were open to join the main body, European civilization, that the Jews would drop their nationalism, being supposedly a religion, and rush into a melding with the European populations.  Little did he realize that the Jews wished to subordinate the European population not to be absorbed into it.

Nevertheless, the cat was out of the bag and couldn’t be put back in.  The Jews were then, if not full citizens, still citizens of their respective host countries with the rights pertaining thereto.

Following Jud Suss and his currency ideas were the Rothschilds.  Nathan, the son who went to England, was the greatest success.  Originally he went to England to enter the textile trade in Manchester in which he was a failure.  Not competent in commerce he went into the banking business in which the currency controlled commerce and was a roaring success.  He went into banking at the propitious moment if not originating at least perfecting the role of exploiting the entire European population by loaning to governments and managing their currencies.  Thus the Rothschilds perfected the Jud Suss idea becoming more important and richer than any European.

The US was a fertile field in which the Jews finally succeeded in taking over the US currency in 1913 with the establishment of the Federal Reserve.  The Federal reserve was established as a private corporation of which the owners were nine international Jewish banking firms joined by the Rockefeller interests as the tenth to make a minyan.  Truly the Fed was a money machine as the Jews and Rockefellers collected annual interest on every US dollar they issued.  Plus, the Fed was an independent entity not being under the control of either the President or Congress.  It was responsible to no one.

Now, all this occurred just as Science was creating the greatest technological revolution the world would ever see.  Technology is the practical arm of Science.  Science for instance discovers and develops the understanding of electricity while technology exploits electricity in the form of dynamos, light bulbs and what have you.  Fabulous fortunes were thus made.  But, that’s not the best part.  The resultant businesses were large affairs that couldn’t be financed by an individual  thus stock shares were invented to raise money.  Very good, now to make the shares liquid a stock market was required.  Et voila!  Another money machine to be exploited. 

So, shortly after the turn of the twentieth century the stage was set for the takeover of the world.  All the money in the world was in control of a few hands.  The Money Trust.

Lacking any supernatural consciousness, God had effectively been expelled from Jewish concerns, the Jews only claim was the national ego and its desire for world dominion.  While the trust in the supernatural was expelled Science was still a threat to Jewish dominance.  A way had to be found to convert Science, i.e. European Knowledge, to Jewish Knowledge per Barbara Spectre and then eliminate European Knowledge leaving only Jewish Knowledge with a slight scientific infusion.

Once again, the Jewish plan first conceived by Joseph Oppenheimer and brought to perfection by the Rothschilds was based on a Jewish-Christian confrontation in which the Jews as the elder branch thought they had the upper hand.  They were blind sided by the rise of Science that changed the paradigm and gave Europeans absolute supremacy.  Bear in mind that Science moved from West to East slowly so that even by 1900 Poland, Russia and the whole of Eastern Europe was barely affected.  While Western Jews were splintered into sects the East was still Rabbinic and Orthodox including the Hasidim.  All three divisions were medieval in outlook.  Hence Zionism took root there quickly and was then exported to the US in the mass migration of 1900-14.

Now, the Jews’ only choice was to submit to Science and inject it with magical elements.  Freud said that the religious consciousness took three major blows to its confidence, the heliocentric astronomy, Darwinian evolution, and, modestly, his own psycho-analytic psychology.  The evolutionary theory was attacked by Henri Bergson who injected it with creation magic that successfully brought evolution within the scope of religious or Talmudic discussion

Franz Boas did the same with Anthropology even more successfully, removing almost all scientific inquiry turning the subject from an unpalatable scientific discussion into a form of religious humanism.  Astronomy was tackled by a nincompoop named Albert Einstein who created astronomical phenomena out of whole cloth with the fabric of time and space in fact.

The main hammer however was the putative psychologist Sigmund Freud.  Freud’s assault was on the mores of the Europeans and Americans, especially sexual mores, in which he was eminently successful.  He was actually able to remold the sexual mores of Europeans and, of course, their offshoot in the United States of America.

While, at least until fairly recently, Freud was able to capture the whole psychological discipline and the become the putative ‘father’ of psychology, he was nothing of the sort.  Psychology was a purely European science until he captured it.  This was done by the Jewish propaganda machine.

After 1897 and the First Zionist Congress the spirit of the Jewish people passed from their god into the souls of Jews.  They now learned or thought they had that their redemption would not come from the divine but the people, that is themselves.  There was no more waiting for the Messiah; they were their own messiah.

The decried  Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion were a result of the 1897 Zionist conference in Vienna.  Although as yet the  exact provenance of the Protocols can’t be determined; certain well founded conjectures can be made.   I, myself, would look to the lodge of the Order of B’nai B’rith of Vienna.  If anybody had been plotting this, it was plotted there.  Also, since 1895 Sigmund Freud had been a prominent member.

Theodore Herzl who was the originator of Zionism was a Viennese. Vienna at this time had replaced Frankfort-on-the-Main as the guiding center of European Judaism.  I have not seen it reported that Herzl was a member of the International Order of B’nai B’rith, but he must certainly have been acquainted with and associated with various members.  He was a prominent journalist.  The Viennese chapter was a revolutionary chapter.  In 1895 a significant figure joined the chapter and that significant figure was Sigmund Freud.  Freud was imbued with a deep hatred of Europe and its people and things European.  He was bloody minded.

As a devout Jew he, not unlike his twenty-first century successor, Barbara Spectre, worked to see Jewish mores and morality replace those of Europe and Europeans.  He longed for the physical destruction of Europe and Europeans.  In 1895 his career as a psychologist was in its infancy.  Yet, he was a protégé of Joseph Breuer and he had studied for a brief but important time with the great Parisian Dr. Jean-Martin Charcot and had rubbed shoulders with Charcot’s acolyte, the near great Pierre Janet, from whom he appropriated many of his ideas.  He had also studied with the great French hypnotist Auguste Liebeault and his Jewish acolyte Hippolyte Bernstein.  I might also mention Freud appropriated whole passages from Gustave Lebon’s The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind which he uncharacteristically credited.  Thus he was well founded in contemporary psychological and hypnotic ideas.  And it should not be forgotten that he was a cocaine addict although this life long habit is suppressed. 

One can only speculate that he, being especially enthusiastic about the drug, turned on the members of B’nai B’rith along with his friends and acquaintances.  Thus, I suspect, if Zionism originated with Herzl in association with B’nai B’rith it was done in a cocaine fog.    I also suspect, might even maintain, that the Protocols were composed in the lodge of B’nai B’rith, hence definitely are of Jewish provenance.  At any rate Freud developed his ideas, possibly discussing and refining them at the weekly meetings in the Lodge that he attended religiously until the Nazis marched into Vienna causing him to remove.  Thus one might say Freud functioned as a secular Messiah of the Jews replacing Sabbatai Zevi while planning the destruction of Europe and Europeans in the spirit of 1666.

This hatred would find expression in the Second Thirty Years’ War of 1914-45 during which the devastation was worse than that of the First Thirty Years’ War.  While the First was between Catholics and Protestants, the Second was between Jews and Aryans.

You may say such a thing was impossible but the template for the method was recorded in Greek Mythology as the invasion of the Semite Cadmus into Aryan Greek Boeotia, just North of Athens.

According to the story Cadmus sowed discord between the native Boeotians who then engaged in a civil war destroying each other as Cadmus ‘ immigrants didn’t have the strength or numbers to take them on.  Then, when the Boeotians had exhausted themselves Cadmus negotiated a peace between while stablishing himself (that is his people) as supreme.  This was followed by the two Theban wars and the Trojan War reclaiming Europe for Europeans.

Of course this is expressed in mythological poetic language in the Greek myths.  As the Jews in Europe were in the same situation as Cadmus in Boeotia they employed the same method, as they are now in the US and Europe.  In the first half of the war they were successful in gaining supremacy in Russia and maintaining supremacy on the continent until the rise of Hitler in Germany who then destroyed their success in Germany but necessitating the second half of the war in which Jewish hopes were temporarily shattered by the attempted genocide.  Unlike the Peace Conference of WWI, WWII, the Thirty years’ War ended with the US and Europe vs. the Soviet Union as two armed camps.

Thus, when WWI ended the Jews via Communism  were supreme across Europe although not yet in undisguised dominance.  Their success in WWI was achieved through their manipulation of the US which was the weight that tipped the balance.  Thus, the Kaiser, the Czar and the Austrian Emperor were eliminated as entities.  Democracy as a political tool then opened the field to Jewish pre-eminence.

The opposition of Hitler and the NSDAP necessitated another war. The success in WWII would depend on US involvement as had WWI.  WWI had altered circumstances.  Apparently unbeknownst  to Europeans there were now two superpowers of which a Europe divided into smaller powers was, as it were, superannuated.  The Soviet Union and the USA were calling all the shots.  The European situation was truly pathetic.

 

Continued in Part 2b-3

Monday, August 28, 2017

The Civil War Never Ended


The Civil War Never Ended

by

R.E. Prindle

Note:  This is supposed to be humorous, but as they say in Hollywood, based on a true story. 

Considerable evidence exists to show that the Civil War began in England in 1066 when Big Bill Norman stepped ashore at Hastings with his hordes and pasted the natives.  The Normans, named after Big Bill known in those days as William the Conqueror but now edited to meet current standards proceeded to enslave the Anglo-Saxons who had been lounging around the area holding the territory for the Normans.  The Anglo-Saxons considered their enslavement a betrayal.  A fierce debate concerning this so-called betrayal is still raging.  The reader is invited to make up his own mind.  Get a few more facts first.

Over there in East Anglia, on the East side of England, this slavery bit, iron collars and all did not go down well.  A great deal of resentment was stored away.  This was before the days of psychoanalysis so it went into their unconscious but not all that deep.  This resentment blazed up in 1600 something when the East Anglians rose up and slew the good King Charlie the One.  Old resentments die hard and a lot harder than you think.  A lesson to be borne in mind.

The fight would have been contained on English shores but for the fact that the New World had been discovered shortly before Charlie’s head hit the basket, or he dangled, I forget which but when you’re dead how important is it?  Escaping Charlie’s and his dad Jim’s oppression, real or imagined, a couple decades before a largish body of East Anglians now going by the name of Puritans fled across the big water, much bigger then when boats were slower, while sometimes not arriving at all, to land on the sparsely populated shore that they named  New Anglia and that became New England.

Well, wouldn’t you just know it?  No sooner were they getting settled than this fellow Cromwell from Old Anglia killed Charlie and seized England.  Now the Anglo-Saxon ruled the roost and those damn Normans, now going by the name of Cavaliers, had to hightail it across the water too.

They now, in their turn, crossed over to the New World but veered South and formed the colony of Virginia, named after an English queen of doubtful virtue, don’t let the name fool you.  It’s true that Charlie was a Scot and not a Norman but as nothing was named after him in the New World, it didn’t matter.

So, now, here is one of the great overlooked facts of history.  The Puritans of New England were glaring almost eyeball to eyeball at the Cavaliers.  I have no doubts they would have gone to war right away if the older colony of New Amsterdam, now New York, Old York is North of East Anglia in the Old Country, had it not been blocking the way.

But there was blood in the eye of the unforgiving Anglians.  They stewed, their resentment festered.  Then the Norman’s enslaved some savage Negroes from Africa.  There, the Anglians thought, they went and did it again.  It was a habit not a one off.  But this time the Anglians were going to get those bastards and get them good.  Kill them all.

Well, to make a long story medium long the Anglos began working up a head of steam about slavery even though they were not pure themselves.  It wasn’t so much that they cared about the Africans, hell, they were just a bunch of savages anyway, but that slavery bit…if you know what I mean.  We was slaves too and we’re not going to tolerate slavery now.  If the Jews had been there in numbers it would have been quite a gathering of ex-slaves and slaves.  A monster convention.

So the Anglians whipped up the bloodiest war there ever was and by force of excessive numbers, conscripting a whole lot of people who didn’t have a dog In the fight, they drove Old Dixie down. Yes, sir.  They drove Old Dixie down.  If you think that was enough for the Anglians, it wasn’t.  They wanted to kill off the whole damn lot of those Normans, cum Cavaliers and any other White men who got conscripted, no distinctions.  Justice is justice, yes, sir.  Stern justice.  Remember that.  The field of Hasting’s will not be forgot although I don’t think it was mentioned at that time.  I just made an historical interpolation, that’s all.

Well, those damn Yankees would’ve murdered the Southern Chivalry for sure except for, if you remember, New York was in the way, as well as Pennsylvania that had been added later.  Cooler heads prevailed so the Yankees were reduced to imposing Reconstruction.  They stripped that Chivalry of all weapons and denuded them of all rights and then made them subjects of their former Negro, African, dark slaves.  Racist minds considered this an indignity, but the Negroes enjoyed it.

Yankee power would fade after a while and while Dixie didn’t rise again the White Folks would break their hold and bring their own heads level with their shoulders again.  After another little while they had a silent revolution that was called Jim Crow and regained control of their country.  Oddly enough they aligned themselves with their New England enemies and became the Democratic Party.  Republicans had left a bad odor in the land.

Now, where was I?  Oh yea, Jim Crow, believe it or not but the Rebs imposed Jim Crow on the whole of the United States.  Then Jim Crow came to a crashing end in 1954, no whimper there, when the Negroes and their Northern allies staged a bloodless coup, a legal decision called Brown v. the Board of Education, something like that.  Yes, sir, Jim Crow was over and the Liberal occupation of America began.  Another revolution of sorts.  Not unlike the first Reconstruction, the disenfranchisement of Whites began.  You was with ‘em or you was Nazis.  Yes, sir.  The Yankees and allies became the Party of Virtue while any who objected to the occupation was of the Party of Evil, styled Nazis after the Party that fought Communism in the Old World.

The Party of Virtue had it their way, no matter what Party occupied the White House until 2016 when the game went wrong somehow.  It wasn’t supposed to be that way but it was.  The Virtue Party has kicked against the pricks, refused to accept the voice of Democracy that said they had overstepped the bounds.  The Virtue party however became unvirtuous and would not accept the will of the country.  Democracy or no democracy they should have won, they thought and said, hell, they even rebelled in the streets,  they made Sumter look like child’s play.  It is too early to tell, but maybe the Second Reconstruction is over and on the National level the Johnny Rebs are back in control.

As you can see, there is nothing new here, the war goes on, only the weapons change.  What began in 1066 in England is still being fought out today.  Will it end here?  Nobody knows.  The wheel of fortune is still spinning, the vagaries of history is still happening.  My only hope is that it will be the best thing for the country.  This I do know, it won’t be right if it comes from those Damn Yankees.

Saturday, August 12, 2017

What Would Martin Luther King Say

What Would Martin Luther King Say
To This?
by
R.E. Prindle
 
An interesting matter was brought up today in the WSJ (8/12-13/17) concerning the making of the HBO series Confederacy.  The ‘alternate history’ story is based on the notion of a successful secession by the South and the continuance of Negro slavery into the present. I can only envision that the script would be conventional in the extreme and, hence, uninteresting. 
Disregarding the inevitable call for censorship by the professional Negroes what should seem clear is that slavery is not the issue.  Slavery of Negros by Negroes is or was a way of life for centuries if not millennia in their native Africa.  Indeed, when Mungo Park, the Scots explorer, made his walking tour of West Africa in the early nineteenth century he was himself taken captive and enslaved.  In his fabulous book “Travels In The Interior Of Africa’ he notes that he saw that seventy-five percent of Africans were slaves of the other twenty-five percent.  If that is accurate at all then nothing could have been less surprising than to find themselves slaves after transportation to the Americas.  The continuation of an existing situation can only be construed as normal.
Nor as bad as conditions may have been on the slave ships it was not much different than the ways Africans treated each other.
The quantitative situation was unchanged but the qualitative situation was.  Rather than being enslaved by their fellow Africans the title to them passed to an alien race, a race of marked differences, a White race and they were transported to virtually a parallel universe in which they had no bearings.  The environmental and political realities changed also.  They were no longer in a primitive timeless Africa but in a vibrant ever changing completely alien political situation in which the difference between themselves and their new owners was one of total inferiority  while economically the gap was unbridgeable.  Black and White.
In Africa the politics was more casual.  Slaves could own slaves, even become economically well off.  In the Americas they were essentially livestock.  Hence the resentment and antagonism of Africans opposed to the alien race, the unforgivable assignment in perpetuity to inferiority.
In Africa where Negroes remained the majority, accommodations could by sought and were achieved in which White supremacy was moderated and then finally expelled, although returning in a new guise.
So, when the final liberation in the US came with the Supreme Court’s Brown vs. The Board Of Education in 1954 it was clearly up to the Negroes to prove their equality by their performance.  Now nearly seventy years on there is little evidence to indicate African equality with, to them, the alien race.  Very frustrating, don’t you think.
Without the benefit of ‘Affirmative Action’ that pernicious White invention, a handicap of many, many points and the very solicitous consideration of White associates they show little equality.  Nevertheless their Liberal associates refuse to accept the obvious and demand that the alien race, that is the Whites, deny its inherent supremacy and demote themselves to an inferior position in the name of ‘social justice.’
It is demanded that the alien race deny the past and abolish history to the extent of destroying any and all monuments and symbols of that past in which African inferiority was so prominent, so inescapable.  Up to this point the alien race has acquiesced, although under duress of having their lives destroyed by objecting, but today when their very existential existence is being denied them White Americans have stood up and declared the social injustice of their enslavement to Africans.
 
Today is a glorious moment in world history to be cherished.  8/12/17 mark it well, make it a national holiday.  In Charlottesville the police declined involvement.  They were nowhere to be seen, hoping the Negro side, composed mainly of Whites, would beat the Whites down.  The Whites came prepared and one might say the first battle of this War for Independence is being fought.  May it continue to spread until the Liberal Negroid agenda is suppressed.

Thursday, July 6, 2017

The Red Octopus vs. The Nazi Hydra


The Red Octopus vs. The Nazi Hydra

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Back in the Red fifties when the term the Red Octopus was first used to describe Red efforts to seize what was humorously described as the free world we anti-Communists, as yet unnamed, were subjected to all kinds of abuse.  ‘A Red under every bed.’  Communists behind the curtains, Communists everywhere, etc.  They even wrote songs belittling us, the Chad Mitchell Trio’s John Birch Society.  We were denounced as conspiratorial maniacs.

Well, the Reds have more or less succeeded in their revolution, it has happened here.  Yet the Reds got used to being victims, they see themselves as downtrodden victims.

Victims need bullies.  Hence bullyism is a hot topic of the day.  There are only two kinds of people according to the Octopus, the righteous Libs and we evil bullies.  I, Evil Bully.  The term bully is too great a generalization lacking the human touch. A certain personalization is missing.  Thus in the twenties and thirties in reaction to Communism Fascism and Nazism also known as Hitlerism arose.

One would think that WWII put paid to Nazism and Hitlerism not to mention Fascism.  NO!  They lived on in the Jewish imagination and the Jews gradually convinced all Europeans and White Americans that they were in fact Fascists and Nazis while individually all Little Hitlers, Ugly Americans.  The Libs denied this as they considered themselves virtuous so they passed the buck to the deplorable Conservatives who eventually become the Nazi Hydra.

For out of that milieu a great conspiracy had slowly been developing in the mind of the Red Octopus, that of the Nazi Hydra.  Thus all societies everywhere have bifurcated  into Red Octopi or the Nazi Hydras.  At this point the tentacles of the Red Octopus cover the globe but in between the tentacles of the Red Octopus the Nazi Hydra exists.  If you locate one branch and lop off the head, while the Octopus seeks out other cells of this pernicious hateful conspiracy, the head grows back again.  It’s like anti-Semitism the Hydra must exist to prove the virtue of the Octopus.

And then, just when the Red Octopus thought the Nazi Hydra was successfully contained a head was growing quietly in the disguise of a TV buffoon, the mighty Donald Trump.  Throwing off his disguise the Hydra chief unlawfully seized the presidency of the United States of American from the chosen Hillary Clinton.

What had been scheduled to be a contest between the Bush Dynasty and the Clinton Machine became a free for all between the Hydra and the Octopus.  Not much of a contest to all appearances.  Mobilizing the forces of the free press and free media; a ferocious campaign was conducted in which the Hydra Trump was belittled and the Octopus Clinton enlarged.  The polls said Clinton would win.  To the ballot boxes!  And when the dust had settled and the smoke had cleared there was the Hydra standing on Home Plate while the Octopus had tentacles covering third, second and first but 3+2+1 didn’t add up to a four bagger.  Trump was president and Clinton was strumming her guitar and singing the blues, out of tune.

The Hydra couldn’t have won fairly said the Octopus.  The Octopus didn’t know how the Hydra had cheated but he had to have, it was the only way he could have won.  But how?  Ah, the Russians, the Russians are coming they manipulated the election, it was the only way he could have won.  But what proof was there?

To be continued…

Saturday, January 28, 2017

Whammo! We're Back To 1984, Pt. II


Whammo! We’re Back To 1984, Pt. II

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Just beneath Bret Stephens article in the WSJ 1/24/17 issue is William McGurn’s article America First Takes On A New Meaning.  McGurn examines his thesis in a more coherent form than Bret.

Trump used the term America First and was condemned by Liberals as a bigot.  I’m not sure that most Liberals even know what the ‘40s America First organization was all about.  The prime thing that most people know is that Charles Lindbergh was accused as an anti-Semite who insulted the Jews.  He didn’t do that but having mentioned the Jews in his Omaha speech he was immediately denounced as an anti-Semite and that denunciation destroyed America First.

The issue was should America involve itself in another European war?  If that was a possibility, as it was, then who was for involvement?  There was certainly no populist movement, quite the opposite.  Lindbergh accurately identified the perps as the British, the Jews and Roosevelt.  As the trio couldn’t deny it or debate the issue they just gaslighted Lindbergh warning everyone away from him.  This is essentially Trump’s situation today but he isn’t Lindbergh.

Now, it was obvious at the time that Jews, England and Roosevelt were promoting US entry.  Books were written about it, check out Walter Millis, I haven’t seen magazine articles of the time but they surely exist and Hollywood produced many anti-German movies in the years leading up to the war.

It was only when it became obvious that the US was being led into war that the America First movement came into existence.  Nor was it created by anti-Semites or Deplorables or Nazi sympathizers but by old line Americans at Yale University.  Lindbergh as the group’s spokesman only became involved after the group was well established.

McGurn, who has limited space for his column assumes, as one must, that people are familiar with America First so he picks highlights to illustrate his point.  It seems that he believes America First was isolationist, the ordinary defamation used by Liberals, as he contrasts use of the term to demonstrate Trump’s isn’t, hence his title:  America First ‘Takes On A New Meaning.’

In my opinion the ’40 Firsters were not isolationists either.  Isolation was impossible then as now.  It was just that the US had no dog in Europe’s fight.  If the war was going to happen the US could not prevent it while there was no great threat to democracy or at least no greater threat than the Communists who were infiltrating the US government.

McGurn tells an interesting anecdote:

A few months earlier two prominent senators- Democrat Burton Wheeler of Montana and Republican Gerald Nye of North Dakota- spoke to an America First rally in a Mid-town Manhattan hall then known as Mecca Temple.  The next day, the New York Times carried a statement from an opposing organization contrasting the crowd’s reaction to mentions of Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin on the one hand with its reactions to Britain’s prime minister on the other:  “It is interesting to note, too, that while there was no disapproval of the foreign dictators the audience of Mecca Temple booed extensively at the name of Winston Churchill.”


In point of fact Churchill who Hitler denounced as a war-monger knew that in a war with Germany England had no chance of winning.  When asked how he expected to win the war Churchill replied:  ‘I’ll get America to do it for us.’  Rather coldblooded don’t you think?

As for the Jews and FDR, the Jews in the person of their spokesman Samuel Untermyer declared war on Germany in 1933.  Shortly thereafter Roosevelt began cooperating with them in their war by declaring an embargo and other measures.  So, actually the US was in an undeclared war with Germany from 1934 on.  By 1940, then, anyone who cared to see saw that Jews, England and Roosevelt were leading us into war on Germany.

In the characterization of Lindbergh as a German agent the Jews are solely responsible.  As a precursor to Philip Roth’s recent The Plot Against America Hollywood made a movie in 1941, Keeper Of The Flame, portraying a character supposed to represent Lindbergh as an incipient Nazi dictator.

So the defamation of Lindbergh was a vicious criminal act.

In a way comparing apples to oranges McGurn contrasts Trump’s claim to put America First.  That is, just as the WWII trio were putting English and Jewish interests first, involving the US in a matter that did not concern it, so the Post-war ’45 Liberal Agenda has placed the interests of others above those of the US.  The US became the doormat of the world while supposedly the most powerful country on earth.

Trump intends to change that.  Rather than accept an inferior position to other countries he intends to put US interests first.  America First.  We’ve given enough of our country away.

Liberal’s, who should know better after watching Obama sacrifice our interests fully misrepresent what Trump means.  Thus having exhausted the Nazi/Hitler meme they are resurrecting the old saw of Orwell’s 1984.

Bankrupt politically, Liberals are now bankrupt morally.

Sunday, March 27, 2016

An Open Letter to Peggy Noonan Of The Wall Street Journal


An Open Letter To Peg Noonan Of The Wall Street Journal

They Also Serve Who Only Stand And Wait

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Perhaps a change is gonna come.  The ever escalating Moslem outrages may finally have awakened the less alert among us.  Of all people Peg Noonan writing in the Wall Street Journal of 3/26-27/16 titled her column Unite To Defeat Radical Jihadism.  Welcome to the living Peg.  May I give some impressions- impressions- not criticisms to enlighten the argument you have advanced.

It is redundant to refer to ‘Jihadism’ as radical.  Jihad is a Moslem military plan of action to conquer the non-Moslem world.  Of Course as you move to recognition of the problem it is less easy for you to deny that the Moslem people are involved, not them, because that would be bigotry, so ‘Jihadism’ a more racially neutral term.

No criticism, Peg, but you are not yet ready to face the facts.  You still believe that ‘a whole people cannot be held accountable for the actions of a few.’  This isn’t true and you have several examples before you to prove it.  I can’t say you do believe it but I’d be surprised if you didn’t, but it is an article of faith that all Germans are responsible for the holocaust of the Jews.  That’s what we’re taught and as far as I can see believe.  All Germans have to pay a penalty, a very heavy one, for what the Nazi minority did and go on paying it forever.  Further Peg as you well know we are taught that all White Americans are inherently racists.  All White people bear responsibility for enslaving the Negro.  Reparations from all White people are due ad infinitum to the end of time.  If you and everyone you have ever come into contact with doesn’t believe the above examples I would have to say you’re prevaricating.

In addition all White people are guilty of the Crusades in Moslem eyes.

But you believe that not all Jews, not all Moslems, not all Negroes are guilty of the actions of their few.  I think they are Peg.  A notion from the 19th century that seems to have been lost in the mists of time is that ‘they also serve who only stand and wait.’  To not denounce is to approve.  Moslems have never denounced a single atrocity committed by their ‘few.’

As that grand old Roman Seneca put it

If fortune had removed you from the foremost position in the State, you should nevertheless stand your ground and help with your words, and if someone stops your mouth, you should nevertheless stand your ground and help in silence.  The service of a good citizen is never useless:  by being heard and seen, by his expression, by his gestures, by his stubbornness and by his very walk he helps.

There are no innocent Moslems, Peg.  They are all helping according to the terms of Seneca.  As far as our people go, Peg, OUR PEOPLE, cherish that thought, I hope I can never be accused of not helping them in any way I can.  White Supremacy is not evil or even bad.  If Whites are not supreme the Moslems, the Negroes, the Jews, the Chinese or someone else will be.

If you or any Whites are willing to be slaves to less deserving peoples, Peg, may you enjoy your humiliation.

Donald Trump sees our danger while he is willing to put his life, his career, his fortune on the line unlike the whining, pusillanimous Republican Elites who are gleefully leading us into slavery.

May the Gods of our Fathers smite them as they deserve.

Take the next step, Peg, call it Radical Islam, then take a bigger step and just say, Moslems.  They also serve as they stand and wait.

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Part I: Is Paris Burning?

Is Paris Burning?
by
R.E. Prindle

An interesting thought exercise is to compare Paris under the Nazi occupation with that of the Moslem infestation of today and then marvel at what people are putting up with in the difference of perception.

Under the Nazi occupation there was complete order and safety.  There were no riots.  While the MSM is mum on the horrors the Moslems are causing in Paris and France they can be seen on sites such as Global Truth.  The destruction caused in the last decade or so is nothing compared to what is coming.  The heavy artillery is moving into Moslem hands, forget rocks.  AK47s, anti-tank weaponry, you name it; rockets to bring down planes, fighters or commercial, take your pick.

As in the United States where Negroes have occupied cities, Moslems have occupied French cities.  The French army, presumably manned by real Frenchmen, no Jews, Moslems or Africans, is preparing  for street to street fighting, if they choose to resist the takeover.  Those anti-tank weapons the Moslems have are going to come in handy.  Damascus come to Paris; Lebanon to France.

Well, the French asked for it, at least the Liberals asked for it, demanded it, the rest will have to endure it, try to survive it.  Once the shooting begins the borders will be blown wide open.  Moslem reinforcements have taken position in Germany.  The invasion of France this time won't be benevolent Nazis but crazed murderous Mohammedans.  Combatants will flow in from Germany to the East, probably Italy from the South and maybe Spain.  Maritime invasion across the Med into the Maritime provinces will keep the army hopping especially as insurrections will probably be nationwide rather than local while there will be no defined front.  Enemies in front, enemies behind.  Take a tip from me and sink the boats at sea, let 'em drown.  It is you or them.

Unlike Americans who all have weapons real French citizens are unarmed so that a slaughter of French citizens like the slaughter of Alexandrians and Cypriots during the Jewish War of ancient Rome will probably make even the European Holocaust look like child's play let alone the trivial Jewish holocaust.  All that guilt for nothing.

The hammer is about to fall, there will be no mercy, show none, it is kill or be killed.  If the Moslem insurrection succeeds in France then all Europe will be under siege.  Germany especially ought to arm its German nationals now in preparation for their Moslem uprising.  It is kill or be killed.  Man up laddies, lassies; forget that misplaced holocaust guilt; do what you have to do.

When the shooting starts let us pray that stray bullets take out the Liberals who betrayed you.  Is Paris burning?