Making Facts Fit The Narrative

Making Facts Fit The Narrative

A Review of Fareed Zakaria In Foreign Affairs

by

R.E. Prindle

Zakaria, Fareed: The New China Scare, Foreign Affairs, Jan-Feb 2020

Mr. Zakaria subtitles his screed:  Why America Shouldn’t Panic About Its Latest Challenger, that is, China.  My objection to Foreign Affairs, Mr. Zakaria and the whole Leftist-Liberal Establishment is that while professing to be far in advance than the Conservatives they cling to the whole post-WWII fantasy of American hegemony or supremacy.  That time is gone.  We are now living in a new Global era which is inter-locked economically while national sovereignty is taking a much diminished role.

Because of the shifting of whole national populations into the United States it is no longer possible, if it ever was, to speak of a unit called America.  America was a dream of the past.  Because of the extreme diversity of the US there is not one but several ethnic Americas.  The Chinese themselves already have a significant presence in the US and are inundating our neighbor to the North, Canada.  These domestic Chinese identify more with China than the US so it is not appropriate to speak of a China while disregarding its ex-pats in the rest of the world.  It is more or a Chinese diaspora and has to be dealt with as such.

Mr. Zakaria is himself a Moslem and in speaking of his ‘chosen’ country he speaks of it as an other and not as his own.  Thus in his subtitle he speaks that ‘America shouldn’t Panic.’  We, who have been born here, perhaps several generations ago, don’t recognize the China problem as panic, we recognize China as a competitor on the world stage that is seeking world dominance or, put another way, it wants to be the Top Country.  China being 90 some percent of the same ethnic group, Han Chinese doesn’t have the identity problem that the US does.  China does not cater to its minority peoples they dominate and subordinate them as with the Uigurs on its Eastern frontier.  Nor are they polite; they round the Uigurs up, put them in concentration camps and ‘indoctrinate’ them out of their ways, which are Moslem, into Chinese ways.  If Europe or the US would attempt that the world, including the Chinese, would put up a howl.  Yet if the West wants to maintain its culture it must ‘indoctrinate’ its minorities as the Chinese do.  Even the Hindus of India have belatedly become aware that their culture is under threat from the Moslems and repressive measures are being taken.

Let us be clear there is no China Scare in the US contrary to Mr. Zakarias assertion.  We are dealing with the new Global situation on a calm rational basis.

By a New China Scare Mr. Zakaria does not mean to refer to a second China scare, he is referencing the defensive measures taken against the Communist threat after WWI and WWII.  By ‘scare’ he means an irrational response to an imaginary threat.  Thus he tries to force the facts to fit his narrative. 

In point of fact there was a Communist threat that had to be quelled.  After WWI the alert and astute Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer rose to the occasion rounding the Communists up and actually deporting a few hundred to the Socialist Homeland, the Soviet Union.  His efforts were compromised by the Domestic Reds in prominent positions.

After WWII HUAC rose to the occasion abetted by 1950 with the activities of the courageous Senator Joseph McCarthy who also were defeated by internal Communist forces, but the Communist momentum was derailed after both wars and forced to reorganize.

Now, Zakaria follows the official CIA line in which ignorant American fears dominate their actions.  Thus they say that in both the aftermath of WWI and WWII there were no Communist threats and the effective responses to defuse those threats were merely panic attacks.  While our great generals had won the wars and our brave American soldiers had outfought their terrible enemies immediately on arriving home they had panic attacks rather than recognizing enemy tactics.  In WWI Mitchell Palmer who acted so magnificently has been defamed as a paranoid dodo.

After WWII Pres. Truman’s actions are characterized this way by Zakaria following the CFR playbook:

In February 1947, US President Harry Truman huddled with his most senior policy advisors, George Marshall, and Dean Acheson and a handful of Congressional leaders.  The topic was the administration’s plan to aid the Greek government in the fight (scary response in Mr. Zakaria’s thought processes) against a Communist insurgency.  Marshall and Acheson presented their case for the plan.  Arthur Vandenberg, chair of the Senate Committee On Foreign Relations, listened closely and then offered his support with a caveat.  “The only way you are going to get what you want,” he reportedly told the president, “is to make a speech and scare the hell out of the country.”

Now, one might say that Pres. Truman, acting in his capacity and duty as the President, presented his speech to alert the country to the threat of World Communist domination which was real and imminent at the time having been encouraged by the Communist sympathizer former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt who Vice President Truman succeeded after having been purposely kept ignorant of the world situation even though Roosevelt was obviously a sick and dying man.

Zakaria says that Pres. Truman was not rational but an irrational scare tactician manipulating the country to get what he wanted.  Zakaria could have co-written Howard Zinn’s trashy history.  This is the way that the Left discredits by insinuation and defamatory characterization ignoring the facts.

Mr. Zakaria continues:

Over the next few months, Truman did just that.  He turned the civil war in Greece into a test of the United States ability to confront international communism.

You see how Zakaria turns the situation from an internationally communist backed insurgency into a civil war, and instead of an international defense against the spread of communism into an ego test of the United States ability to confront international communism.  Obviously Truman and the US was at fault and not Joseph Stalin and international communism.  Thus we go from a communist insurgency to a civil war, to a ‘test’ against international communism.  This says something as to why the CFR would allow such trash in their magazine.

Quote:  (note the language)

Reflecting on Truman’s expansive rhetoric about aiding democracies anywhere, anytime, Acheson confessed in his memoirs that the administration had made an argument “clearer than truth.”  Something similar is happening today in the American debate about China.

Unquote.

Not the negative characterization of the phrase ‘Truman’s expansive rhetoric about aiding democracies anytime, anywhere’ and Acheson ‘confessed.’  Did he really confess or merely state what might have been an obvious truth to him.  And his ‘clearer than truth’ may be meant positively rather than negatively.  It can possibly be read both ways but Zakaria make Acheson ‘confess’ which is negative.  This is the Leftist way.

Perhaps English is Mr. Zakaria’s second language while Arabic is his first. Oh, I know, I know, even though Mr. Zakaria is a Moslem he is as ‘American’ as apple pie.  He may even have been born here, right?

Mr. Zakaria says that similar to the ‘Red Scares’ is happening today  in the American debate about China.  Not true, there is nothing similar at all.  This is a different time, different circumstances and a different grope for power.  What Americans should panic about is Mr. Zakaria’s being given space to spin his anti-American vitriol.  Would it be out of line to ask from which university Mr. Zakaria received his degree in history?

Jeff Bezos- The Seattle Great Satan

Jeff Bezos- The Seattle Great Satan

by

R. E. Prindle

 

The tale has been told.  The Alabama election is over.  Judge Roy Moore has been turned back.  Jones didn’t do it nor all the Negroes collected and bussed to the polls.  No, ‘Bamans didn’t have anything to do with it.  To find the man who singlehandedly beat the Judge you have to go to Seattle, Washington, the offices of Amazon, Inc. and sitting behind that big mahogany desk, Mr. Jeff Bezos. The Devil in disguise.

A couple years back Jeff Bezos bought the nearly defunct Washington Post Newspaper.  Paid big money for it too.  At them I asked myself why he did that.  What was his plan to turn it around.  He didn’t have a plan turn it around, he didn’t even change the format; if anything the paper was more Liberal than ever, staffed by the same nerds.

It did occur to me somewhen along the way that Jeff Bezos was grooming himself to run for President.  Bezos is a world beater; a genius of some merit, he wants to be Master of the World; unscrupulous as the devil as he always gets around any rules that might slow him down.

The Judge Roy Moore candidacy shows us exactly why he bought the Post.  Ever unscrupulous, he bought himself a slander machine, a defamation factory, a political slaughter house.  The Post was unfeelingly, not critical, in its condemnation of candidate Trump.  As the Post goes so must go its owner, Jeff Bezos.

Judge Roy is a real bete noir of the CFR, he is opposed to their agenda at every stop.  They have tried to kill his career at each step.  They have removed him from office because of his religion.  No, he’s not Moslem, not a Scientologist, nobody has ever called him a Jew, no none of those:  he’s the most despised of all, a bottom of the barrel damnable Christian.  I don’t want you to get the idea that I’m religious, Defender of the Faith or anything like that.  I’m not religious but that doesn’t mean I’m not anti-Christian.  No.  I’m also anti-Moslem and anti-Jewish while I don’t think much of Hinduism or any of those touchy-feely, warm and fuzzy outfits also.

So, going in Judge Roy had even more than three strikes against him; he was an entire side.

But, damn that son-of-a-bitch, here he was running for the Senate and a cinch to win.  What the hell?  Well, there sat Jeff Bezos, sometime richest man in the world, sitting behind the mahogany in his office in Seattle or, perhaps, roving his hundreds of thousands acre Texas ranch saying to himself, I’ve got to stop hat no good son-of-a-bitch and I know how to do it.  I’ve got the right tool for the job.

I don’t know hat Amazon has a secret service but I’m sure they do, so he sent his sleuths down to ‘Bama to find some dirt or create.  From the looks of that Senior yearbook it looks more like created.  Anyway, as proof that she’d been molested forty years ago by Judge Roy she produced an inscription in her yearbook signed by Judge Roy.  It looks like she presented it to him at some event, political or otherwise, held at some place called The Olde Hickory House, dated 1977.

Now, Judge Roy signed it something like ‘To a lovely girl.’  The woman (I don’t mention her name to protect her from possible harassment) commemorated his event by adding the place and date so she wouldn’t forget.

Jeff Bezos then published the story that Judge Roy was a pedophile and racist.  The girl must have been all of eighteen and dizzy from standing next to the great Alabama blossoming legend, and that may the closest she ever got.

What defeated Judge Roy was that inscription in that yearbook that Jeff Bezos unscrupulously published with no fear of being brought to account for bearing false witness.

I got it!  I know why Mr. Bezos bought the Washington Post.  He’ll be our Democratic candidate in 2020 and he has one of the two most prestigious papers in the US to promote his interests and defend them.

The Pres. should call on his Republican buds to give Jeff Bezos the Bill Gates treatment.  Keep him busy in Washington for a few months so he can’t run his Empire so effectively.  Might be a lesson well learned.

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The website 23&Me ran a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal today. (6/20/17) titled Everyone Deserves A Place In The World.

The ad posits this possible fact:

Over 65 million.  That is the amount of people who have been forced from their homes worldwide.  Continuing conflicts and political instability…continue to displace more and more people each day.

 

I’m sure the above is trueish.  The implication is that someone, obviously in more stable areas, should take them in because,

…we still have a tendency to focus on differences when we talk about humanity

I’m not sure that the conclusion drawn from the premise follows.  This is known as fuzzy thinking.

We see otherness when we should see kinship.

We see “them” not “us”.

 

But on a genetic level, human beings are 99.5% identical.

 

This is pure scientific fact.

 

I don’t know how pure that science is or even if it’s a fact, but I do know this:  I can’t run as fast as Usain Bolt.  Something tells me that there’s more than .5% difference between us.

The ad goes on to implicitly call for the more politically stable US and Europe to take in all 65 million.  There is a basis to compare the facts of taking in just a few million to taking in 65 million.  I’m not just talking the logistics.

Europe, Canada and the US have taken in several million Moslem displaced human beings who according to 23&Me are nearly exactly like us, but do they think the same.  Only .5% difference but we are all 100% human beings.

Just a few million displaced persons have created constant turmoil in the once stable European countries of Sweden, Germany, England France and Italy.  Our fellow human beings have colonized cities and large areas from which they exclude “us”.  These areas are called no go zones for “us”.

Our fellow human beings (99.5% identical) have murdered innumerable “usses” in terrorist attacks, they have raped countless women and blamed the rape on them because they were inappropriately dressed.  In other words they wore European clothes rather than Moslem clothes.  That’s all it took to justify rape in Moslem minds. (99.5%)  They have bullied thousands of men who are forbidden defend themselves lest they be jailed as Islamophobes.

Yes, 23&Me they share 99.5% DNA but are they 100% grateful human beings?  Did I mention that among their crimes they coerced thousands of underage English girls into prostitution?  Does that affect you at all?

Are there 65 million displaced persons in the world?  Are you aware, 23&Me, that in a couple decades, by 2050, when the world population increases by a billion or so that there may be over 200 million or more displaced persons?

I don’t think your heart will be big enough to contain them.

Thanks for the lovely sentiments.

How To Solve The Moslem Problem

How To Solve The Moslem Problem

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Europe and the US have no one to blame for their Moslem problem but themselves.  They developed a social system like no other social system that had ever existed on the planet.  Completely foreign to human psychology and then they expected the world to embrace it on first sight.  As might be expected, other more traditional social systems being confronted by what they considered a monstrosity considered the Western system to be an existential threat.  It had to be destroyed.

The most virulent of this opposition was aroused in the mind of the Moslem world.  But what was the method to be to destroy the West?  It was obvious that the pure military destructive power of the West could not be equaled by any effort of the Moslems.  Since military warfare was out of the question they resorted to an asymmetrical warfare taking advantage of Western psychology that they had thoroughly analyzed.

The Moslems learned the rules of Western society and how to violate them with impunity.  As I say the West has caused its own problem confident in their military superiority they bombed Moslem countries virtually into oblivion.  This created vast numbers of displaced persons who migrated into the countries that had just destroyed theirs.  These countries failed to see that they came as avengers intent still on destroying the Western social system and replacing it with theirs.

Once in place they began to put their asymmetrical methods into practice.  Their warfare methods were treated as crimes no matter how horrendous they were.  A perfect example is the bombing of the World Trade Center in the US, NYC.  This sensationally successful operation cost them nothing other than 19 dead operators.  Their explosives were two hijacked commercial airliners loaded with jet fuel which were flown into the towers.  The result was not only that the two towers crashed to the ground but several ancillary buildings also, the total value was billions of dollars, three thousand dead civilians and the disruption of NYC for months while people as far away from NYC as Portland, Oregon feared an attack on its lone tower.  The not very bright US president, George Bush, shut down the entire US for four days costing billions and fatally weakening  the economic structure of the US.  Bush’s further response was to spend trillions of dollars in a knee jerk reaction bombing the crap out of Iraq and Afghanistan.  This ran the national debt deep into the trillions of dollars.  Altogether this action that cost the Moslems nothing was perhaps the most successful military operation ever.

Not bad results for very little investment.

 In addition the Western reaction was masochistic. They treated this horrendous act of war as a mere crime, rounded up some hapless Moslems who may or may not have had anything to do with the assault and put them on trial in a court of law.  All the perpetrators died in the assault.  If it was a mere crime this situation ended with their deaths.  The Moslems must have thought:  These guys are suckers! We can take them!

Then began a peaceful invasion of the West aided by Western politicians whose motives are still unclear.  They’ve never been analyzed.  Thus, now going on decades, Moslems have been committing every type of act of war with impunity while colonizing whole cities including London, Paris and NYC.  In England, they recruited hundred’s perhaps thousands of young English girls to work as prostitutes, sanctioned by the government lest stopping it might be called, get this, racist.  No kidding.  Can’t you see the Moslems laughing their asses off around their hookah making obscene jokes.

They bombed the Boston Marathon injuring hundreds, the American masochistic response was:  Don’t go off the deep end here.  Not all Moslems are bad; these were terrorists.  Well, OK, then what?  The Moslems have been terrorizing Paris for a decade where dozens of cars are burned every night.  If what I read is true, Saturday June 10, 2017 Moslems are going to begin a terror campaign of suicide bombers, armed assaults with AK 47s, bombings and whatever that will continue until Paris is destroyed.  And France dithers.

In England the Moslems bomb a concert filled with children and all is forgiven. The West looks at a picture of a little Moslem child injured and goes off the deep end.  But, masochistically accepts the bombing of English children?  The Moslems get another big laugh.

Something must be done, the Moslems are about to conquer the West, but what?  Military operations are out of the question, we would merely be destroying ourselves.  OK.  Why not take a page out of the Moslem book?  What do the Moslems do when they conquer countries?  What will they do when they conquer the West?

Quite simply, they will impose civil disabilities.  Read your Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon.  I’m serious.  Go out and get a copy now if you don’t have one.

As Gibbon tells it, when the Moslems conquer a country they impose civil disabilities on the non-Moslem population.  Thus, even though the Moslems were a small part of the population they were able to control the much larger majority.  Among the disabilities the natives were forbidden to ride horses being restricted to asses and donkeys.  Those they had to ride facing backwards inculcating a feeling of inferiority and humiliation.  There was an extra non-Moslem poll tax and other humiliations.  Of course, one could escape these disabilities by converting to Moslemism.  Thus, the non-Moslem majority was turned into a Moslem majority.

In today’s struggle the Moslem minority, while having more chutzpah than a whole tribe of Jews, is attempting to seize control of the narrative by ceaseless atrocities that the silly West continues to treat as crimes thinking, I presume, to solve the problem by removing the perps from the streets.  Of course there is no bottom to the number of fanatics willing to be imprisoned or die.

The only possible solution to the problem that is viable is to impose onerous disabilities on the Moslems including a heavy poll tax.  The option of renouncing Moslemism is available otherwise Moslems would have to endure the humiliation of civil disabilities or leave for Moslemland.

I’m sure that those who haven’t realized that the old democracy disappeared with the Twin Towers, as the Moslems intended, will object.  They have to be overridden or we might as well turn Moslem now.  There is simply no other viable option.  Impose disabilities now.  Sent the Imams back to Arabia and make the rest shave their beards.

This must be done if the West is to survive and done now.  Let us hope President Trump has the courage to do the necessary.

Moslems: Should We Use Our Head Or Should We Use Our Heart?

Moslems:

Should We Use Our Head

Or Should We Use Our Heart?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Ye Editor at the Wall Street Journal (9/17-18/16)  babbles on.  I have never considered the Journal a Conservative paper and now Ye Editor drops the façade and goes full buttoned up Liberal.

Ye Editor:  Thanks to the Obama Administration and Congressional Republicans, the GOP candidate now has a chance to show common sense on the matter of Muslims.

I suppose that’s code for saying a back door has been found to let in Moslems.  Sure enough.  Trump according to Ye Editor has ‘a chance to prove his policy is not anti-Muslim but anti-jihad.’  Ah, then we wrong to think all jihadists are Muslims.  I suppose then that as all jihadists are Moslems they wear identifying badges, because if they don’t….  Or one imagines that a Moslem who for a number of years hasn’t been a jihadist may one day wake up and say it is time he came out of the closet.  Perhaps Ye Editor thinks that jihadists are born that way.  Just another Moslem sect.

Oh, and sects.  There are a number of Moslem sects.  The Wahabis are supposed to be the most militant of all.  The Saudi WTC boys may well have been Wahabis as they were Saudis.  Would Ye Editor agree that Wahabis have the most potential to come out of the closet, supposing they are in the closet, and that therefore Wahabis should definitely be banned by Trump or, perhaps, even by Obama, that great and wise leader.

Does Ye Editor even know whether Obama has considered that problem?

And regional.  Do most jihadists come from certain regions?  Sunnis, Shiites?  Perhaps the US should be selective as to sect and region?  But, then, what if a Moslem lies about his sect or region?  Bigoted to think a Moslem might lie?  Well, the Koran, the Moslem guide book and holy script says it’s perfectly A-OK to lie to the Nasranis.  US personnel are most likely to be Nasranis so putting the question would be useless.

I’m sure common sense comes in here somewhere.  Maybe, just maybe, Trump is exhibiting common sense when he says he will ban all Moslems.   I think he is.  Common sense is good but it is not the ultimate test.  Don’t education and intelligence work in there too?  I sure hope so.  Perhaps thought I’m all head and no heart while Ye Editor is the latter and not the former.  Well, Ye Editor, it is common sense to not screw yourself.  Letting in Moslems is screwing yourself but then, I guess you’re comfortable with that.

 

Trump:  Do not let these geeks back you off from your original stand concerning Moslems.  When you’re right you’re right.

The Continuing Saga Of Trump

The Continuing Saga Of

Trump

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Cry Globalism!  First the complaint against Trump was that he was an Isolationist in a Globalist world.  Now it turns out that Trump has a better understanding of Globalism than his Liberal opponents.

It would appear that what Globalism meant to Liberals was smearing a thin veneer of Nationalist Americanism over the Globe and calling it Democracy.  They appear surprised that they are being challenged by the much despised Putin of Russia.  They don’t seem to grasp that Obama has sacrificed US supremacy and that on a global playing field the US isn’t even the first among equals.

Rather than saying that Putin is entering into US politics for global reasons why not say that Russian interests conflict with American interests and in global politics they are jockeying for position no differently than Democrats and Republicans in this election.  There is no reason that an accord cannot be reached.  Trump understands what Liberals don’t; it would be better for Russia and the US to work together rather than get involved in conflict.  Of course Obama would like nothing better than to see Eastern Whites and Western Whites fight a war of annihilation that would completely destroy Western Civilization.  What was that Sixties chant:  Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civilization has got to go?  Do you imagine that Negroes have changed their minds?  OMG, did I say something racist?  If I did then that’s the way it must be.  Get over it!

While plumping for a war against the Russians Liberals crazily defend Moslems who are, in fact, seeking to destroy all other religions and societies that refuse to accept their god Allah.  Liberals thus by encouraging Moslems work their own destruction.

Trump sees clearly our compatibility with the Russians and our incompatibility with the Moslems.  There can be no more reasonable approach to the Moslem problem than not only barring the importation of more but the deportation of those that are here.  Obama himself if not a Moslem is sympathetic to and partial to the Moslems.  He favors them.  Everything he has done since becoming president indicates this.  He spent his formative years as a Moslem in Indonesia.  His stepfather Lolo Soetoro saw to his indoctrination.  The indoctrination seems to have taken.

Obama’s attitude will be followed by his protogee Hillary Clinton if she is elected.  It is not improbable that Obama will be the directing power, the grey eminence, behind Clinton if by mischance she is elected.  This is undoubtedly clear in political circles while surely known to Trump.

That is why the Dem-Rep Liberals fear a Trump presidency.  He is going to upset their apple cart.

It is quite possible that a Trump-Putin agenda may evolve and follow thus uniting Eastern and Western White interests into a unity to which they belong.

If Americans have any sense at all they will vote Trump.

They will vote for their own preservation.  One hopes they will forfend this racist bullcrap in which all discussions are framed.  Suicide is for losers.

An Open Letter to Peggy Noonan Of The Wall Street Journal

An Open Letter To Peg Noonan Of The Wall Street Journal

They Also Serve Who Only Stand And Wait

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Perhaps a change is gonna come.  The ever escalating Moslem outrages may finally have awakened the less alert among us.  Of all people Peg Noonan writing in the Wall Street Journal of 3/26-27/16 titled her column Unite To Defeat Radical Jihadism.  Welcome to the living Peg.  May I give some impressions- impressions- not criticisms to enlighten the argument you have advanced.

It is redundant to refer to ‘Jihadism’ as radical.  Jihad is a Moslem military plan of action to conquer the non-Moslem world.  Of Course as you move to recognition of the problem it is less easy for you to deny that the Moslem people are involved, not them, because that would be bigotry, so ‘Jihadism’ a more racially neutral term.

No criticism, Peg, but you are not yet ready to face the facts.  You still believe that ‘a whole people cannot be held accountable for the actions of a few.’  This isn’t true and you have several examples before you to prove it.  I can’t say you do believe it but I’d be surprised if you didn’t, but it is an article of faith that all Germans are responsible for the holocaust of the Jews.  That’s what we’re taught and as far as I can see believe.  All Germans have to pay a penalty, a very heavy one, for what the Nazi minority did and go on paying it forever.  Further Peg as you well know we are taught that all White Americans are inherently racists.  All White people bear responsibility for enslaving the Negro.  Reparations from all White people are due ad infinitum to the end of time.  If you and everyone you have ever come into contact with doesn’t believe the above examples I would have to say you’re prevaricating.

In addition all White people are guilty of the Crusades in Moslem eyes.

But you believe that not all Jews, not all Moslems, not all Negroes are guilty of the actions of their few.  I think they are Peg.  A notion from the 19^th century that seems to have been lost in the mists of time is that ‘they also serve who only stand and wait.’  To not denounce is to approve.  Moslems have never denounced a single atrocity committed by their ‘few.’

As that grand old Roman Seneca put it

If fortune had removed you from the foremost position in the State, you should nevertheless stand your ground and help with your words, and if someone stops your mouth, you should nevertheless stand your ground and help in silence.  The service of a good citizen is never useless:  by being heard and seen, by his expression, by his gestures, by his stubbornness and by his very walk he helps.

There are no innocent Moslems, Peg.  They are all helping according to the terms of Seneca.  As far as our people go, Peg, OUR PEOPLE, cherish that thought, I hope I can never be accused of not helping them in any way I can.  White Supremacy is not evil or even bad.  If Whites are not supreme the Moslems, the Negroes, the Jews, the Chinese or someone else will be.

If you or any Whites are willing to be slaves to less deserving peoples, Peg, may you enjoy your humiliation.

Donald Trump sees our danger while he is willing to put his life, his career, his fortune on the line unlike the whining, pusillanimous Republican Elites who are gleefully leading us into slavery.

May the Gods of our Fathers smite them as they deserve.

Take the next step, Peg, call it Radical Islam, then take a bigger step and just say, Moslems.  They also serve as they stand and wait.

The Rising Tide Of Anti-Semitism And Jewish Hysteria

The Rising Tide Of Anti-Semitism

And Jewish Hysteria

by

R.E. Prindle

 

http://www.onenewsnow.com/education/2015/02/03/jewish-frat-tagged-with-swastikas-after-uc-wide-israel-boycott#.VNKeRctTE5s

 

One has to wonder about the Jews.  In 1964 when there was no anti-Semitism in the US except in the minds of the Jews caused by their reaction to events of WWII, perhaps from boredom and needing some excitement the Jews decided to create some anti-Semitism.  In 1965 they pushed through a new immigration law that invited their Moslem arch-enemies into the US.

While billing themselves as the most intelligent people on earth they failed to learn from their own 1900 immigration experience.  In Poland, for instance, where they were a minority, they claim there was outrageous anti-Semitism.  Well and good.  But, when the Jews and Poles mixed in the US the tables were equalized so that Jews were able to punish Poles.

Now, in Israel backed by the financial and military might of the US with additional billions of guilt dollars from Germany Jews were able to maintain an oppressive upper hand punishing Moslems.

Today, as a result of the ’65 immigration law Moslems outnumber Jews in the US and the roles are reversed as with the Jews and Poles.  So, the ‘smartest people in the world’ claim anti-Semitism is on the rise in the US.  That’s a surprise isn’t it?  They imply that the country as a whole is increasingly anti-Semitic.  In fact Whites in the US have been cowed, yes, Whites exist under civil disabilities instituted by the Jews.  They’re called ‘hate laws.’  The problem is between Jews and the Moslems they invited into the country.  The Middle East war has been translated to the US.  Let’s face it, it is purely a Jewish problem.  What do we Whites care?

Now at UC-Davis we are told by someone called Michael F. Haverluck that a great crime has been perpetrated against a Jewish fraternity house.  The ‘crime’ is what was called a harmless prank back in the fifties.  A number of swastikas were apparently placed on the frat house walls.  (See link above.)  How you can spray anything on an inhabited frat house on an active campus and not get caught in the act mystifies me.

Nevertheless there the swastikas are.  But the perps are unknown.  In the rising tide of Jewish hysteria the Jews fail to note that, if not their own hoax which is probable, then the only possible perps must be Moslems.  Who else?  Why don’t the Jews make the obvious claim rather than pretending that perhaps Chinese, did it?  Mexicans?  Maybe Martians?  Who in their multi-cultural paradise are the Jews blaming?

Instead the Jews pretend that they are alone in a totally hostile environment.  I don’t know if the Jews on the UC campi have looked around them but if they do they will have to search hard for a White face.  I was on the Berkeley campus a couple years ago and passing through a long row of kiosks there were Moslem, Mexican, Filipino and whatever else info booths and I was hard pressed to find anyone who wasn’t Asian- East or West.  In fact, there were no White exhibitors.

The Whites I did see on campus were wasted drug addicts walking around in rags, literally.

So, if anti-Semitism is becoming a problem for Jews on UC’s campi I suggest they address their fellow Moslem Semites to see if they can smooth out the problem.  It’s you Jews, stupid, not us.  We’re functioning under the civil disabilities imposed on us by them.  All I can say is a plague on both Semitic houses, Jews and Moslems.  We don’t care what happens to either.

As for Haverluck, he should try for a less tendentious style

Don't Write Off France Just Yet

Moslem/Jewish Danger Signals

by

R.E. Prindle

http://blogs.forward.com/sisterhood-blog/212649/dont-write-off-france-just-yet/? 

Symi Rom-Rymer writing on the Jewish Sisterhood site linked above in an article superciliously titled Don’t Write Off France Yet make this comment:

When news broke about the hostages being held in the kosher supermarket in Paris, I began to hear rumblings on social media about rampant French anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic acts perpetrated by French Muslims.  At one point on Friday, I overheard a conversation between two women at a synagogue in Washington DC, in which Holocaust comparisons were frequently invoked.  In yet another response to the attacks, an American Rabbi likened Jews to the canary in the proverbial coal mine.

 

France [that is the French ‘community’] has long struggled with integration of its minority communities- Jewish and Muslim alike.  The French government’s inability to handle tensions over international politics like the Middle East conflict and the disintegration of social cohesion at home has only furthered simmering resentments.

Such muddled thinking as Miss Rom-Rymers’ almost defies analysis.  Her American rabbi’s comment about Jews being the canary in a coal mine seems most apt and even prescient.  Canaries, of course, were taken into the coal mines  because they were early victims to accumulating poisonous gases.  When the canary keeled over it was time to get out.

Indeed inter-community tensions may be near the breaking point and not only in France.  The fantasy the ruling sect of the West entertains that many cultures can maintain distinct identities while living side by side is rapidly being disproved, although god knows there are legions of us who understood in advance of the immigration, including every Moslem alive and I suspect also the Jews who instigated the tension in the first place.  As usual the Jews have cast themselves as the wise old heads and in this case the French as muddlers who just can’t get it right.

The writing about the Charlie Hebdo incident the article refers to seems to want to maintain that multi-culturalism in the West is a success except for rising anti-Semitism in the French community and anti-Semitic acts by the Moslem community, that is, the occasional 9/11 or Charlie Hebdo.

Thus, even though these tensions are actual wars going on in France, that is, on the one hand between Moslems and Jews and on the other Moslems and French, with Moslems being the aggressor in each case.  Miss Rom-Rymer places the fault for the tensions on French men and women because of their failure to integrate the warring parties.  She doesn’t give any indication of how this might be done however.

One must assume that the failure to make Jews and Moslems lie down together is completely one sided.  Even though neither Moslems nor Jews wish to give their identities up, seeking to impose those on French people.   I suppose that means that the French are stubbornly holding onto their trashy French identity.

Apparently Miss Rom-Rymer and her Jewish brethren fail to comprehend that only one identity can survive over time.  In fact the most stubborn, or perhaps fanatical, participant will survive and that one will be transmuted by the others in the process.  Thus when the Moslems stormed into Iran they imposed civil disabilities on the Iranians so that in the long run it was easier to become Moslem and equal rather than Iranian and groaning under onerous civil disabilities.

However, as the Moslems did so they created an Iranian strain of Moslemism called Shia while the Arabs became Sunnis.  The Iranians while converted religiously remained unconquered waging Shiite wars with the Sunnis from then to the present.

So, the disintegrating social cohesion, if there ever was any cohesion, in France is because the French government refuses to accept the consequences of allowing millions  of intolerant historically retarded Moslems into the country without imposing severe civil disabilities on them thus  requiring them to rethink their position among Western mores.  At this stage it looks as though France will be as Moslem as Iran in fifty years and with their own brand of Euro-Moslemism.  And just as hostile toward the Sunni and Shiite retards as the Shiites are now of the Sunnis.

The crisis in Judaism is mounting fast.  Truly as the rabbi says, the Jews are the canary in the coal mine.  It is time for them too to rethink their position vis-à-vis both the West and the Moslems.  They are a stone in the shoe making everyone uncomfortable.  They may have to choose conversion or be removed.  Both Moslems and the West have little care for them.  There are enough other irritants than to tolerate them.

Miss Rom-Rymer might take a few moments to contemplate the conversation she overheard between the two women in the DC synagogue.

Civil Disabilities In A Democracy

Civil Disabilities In A Democracy

By

R.E. Prindle

It’s amazing how blind people can be to what they are doing; what they are creating.  Take this conversation in a coffee shop that I overheard.  Four guys were talking.  I knew them all or knew of them.  They were somewhere between forty and forty-five.  White, high school dropouts, unemployed for four years or more.  I’ll call them Jim, Jack, Bob and Ray just in case one of them might read this and demand a cut of the proceeds. Of course, there are no proceed  but these guys are incapable of simple reasoning.  I have edited the conversation for intelligibility.

Jim, the protagonist, speaks first:  What do you guys think of this Charlie Hebdo shooting in Paris?  These Moslems are getting out of hand.  (Yeah, uh-huh, sure)  Before it spreads over here we should put some civil disabilities on them to keep them in their place, I think.

Jack:  What do you mean, civil disabilities?

Jim:  You know restrictions, make them register, extra taxes, keep them from owning cars, computers, things like that.   Like they do when they’re in charge.

Bob:  Whoa there, wait a minute.  All the Moslems aren’t guilty because of what a few idiots do.

Jim:  Bull!  Have you seen all the Twitter hash tags congratulating these slugs, calling for more everywhere, including here.  They don’t have any doubts the thing was an act of war.

Ray:  Aw, so what?  Anyway you can’t restrict people by thing-um-bobs in a democracy.  People can do what they want.

Jim:  So-called democracy you mean.  We’re already restricted plenty.  Civil disabilities on us too so what’s wrong with putting them on some crazy murderous Moslems?  They can’t be allowed to go around murdering and destroying wholesale.

Bob:  Civil whatchamacalllums on us!  Don’t go overboard Jim, they’ll have to place you on meds.  We’ll see you stumbling down the street muttering to yourself.

Jack:  Name a disability, Jimmy boy.

Jim:  You don’t think I can?  Try this one on for size.  You guys never heard of hate laws?  Well, hate laws give named groups special preference.  Say anything about Blacks, Jews, Fags, or women and you’re racist, anti-Semitic or sexist.  You can go to court.  The only group that isn’t protected is us.  White men.  We’re outside the law and that’s a civil disability in this so-called democracy.  Don’t get too hoity toity about how perfect this country is.  It’s not, it’s fucked.

Look at the Blacks.  The whole merit system was discarded because of so-called disparate impact because the Blacks couldn’t cut it.  That means that people of merit are being discriminated against and the unqualified are given preference.  That’s favoritism or a new spoils system.  So where’s democracy in that?  Why isn’t that creating a civil disability?  It is.  And it’s getting worse.  Because of Ferguson Blacks don’t even have to follow the laws anymore but we can still be arrested for jay walking.

Ray:  Aw, Jim, you worry too much.  You sound like a real racist to me.  Better be careful or you’ll lose your job.

Jim:  Lose our jobs!  What jobs?  We lost those four years ago.

Jack:  That’s because there ain’t any jobs.

Bob:  Oh yeah?  The Mexicans don’t have any trouble finding jobs.

Jack:  Hell yes.  If you want to work for Mexican wages.  I’m White.  I gotta have White wages to get by.

Bob:  None of us have had any wages for four years.  Even unemployment has run out.

Jack:  So what?  That don’t mean I’ll going to take Mexican money.  I’d steal first.

Bob:  You already are.

Jack:  So are you.

Bob:  Maybe.  But I’m getting ready to take Mexican money.

Jack:  Phaw!  Go on.

Jim:  That’s what I mean.  We’re not going to get any jobs anyway.  After four years who’s going to hire us?  I don’t want to work like a Mexican anyway.  They work too hard and do too good a job.  I’m not going to do that for anybody.  Don’t even take their breaks.  Just do the work and move to the next job.  Where’s that?  Anyway, we’re off my point.  How about placing civil disabilities on the Moslems before they add to those already on us.

Bob, Jack and Ray together:  Civil disabilities my ass.  This is America.  We ain’t got no civil disabilities that we can see.

 

Not that they can see.  No hope is there?

The Charlie Hebdo Moslem Outrage

The Charlie Hebdo Moslem Outrage

by

R.E. Prindle

http://blogs.forward.com/forward-thinking/212266/how-terror-attack-hits-raw-nerve-for-paris-jews-li/?utm_content=ThemedNewsletter_MainSection_TopArticle_OneItemLayout_Image&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Opinion&utm_campaign=Opinion%202015-01-07

 

As we are all aware Moslem bigots murdered the staff of the magazine Charlie Hebdo.  There are French and there are Jews and there are Moslems.  Speaking for his Jewish community, as he says, Laurent-David Samama in the above Jewish Daily Forward article makes some inexplicable comments demonstrating a cognitive disconnect on the Jewish relation to the crime at the very least:

 

Like all French citizens, my particular community- the French community- is reeling from the news.  Concerned as we have been for years about the spiraling communal tensions, the anti-Semitic attacks on Jews and the steadily mounting anti-Muslim sentiment, this hits an especially raw nerve.

The majority [of Jews] is now increasingly attracted by radical speeches offering solutions to the problem of French anti-Semitism…

Mr. Samama is apparently not living on this planet or he is incapable of evaluating the situation.  What problem, one might ask, is there concerning French anti-Semitism.  There is no problem among the French concerning anti-Semitism as defined by the Jews.  There is only the hatred of Jews instilled in Moslems by Jewish atrocities in Palestine.  There are no French Jews; there are only Jews living in France.

As such it they who have created the problem of ‘French anti-Semitism’ by promoting Muslim immigration in France, Europe and the Americas.

The incredibly obtuse statement- anti-Semitic attacks on Jews and mounting anti-Muslim sentiment- is such an oxymoron as to stun the objective intellect.  Anti-Semitic attacks in France are made exclusively by Moslems, no French are involved.  That war is exclusively between Jews and Moslems.  No French involved.  If the Jews cannot be reached in Palestine then Moslems will attack them wherever they are vulnerable.  So Jews and Moslems- it is an intra-Semitic problem, not Europe and the Americas.

As to the war between the Moslems and the French only one mental system can survive, the Scientific, or secular in Mr. Samama’s language, or the Moslem religious bigotry which is no different than Jewish religious bigotry and both are deadly to the West.

The hypocrisy of Mr. Samama’s comment “Leaders and religious representatives of [the Jewish community in France] are calling for peace and unity at a time when France is divided over the question of Islam.” is unbelievable.

Oh, please.  Having created the ‘disunity’ the wise benevolent Jews are calling on ‘divided’ France to come together under their direction.  We know that song and dance.

France is not divided over the Moslem ‘question.’  The Moslems and France are at war as the Charlie Hebdo murders clearly indicate.  It is the Moslem way or the highway.  Perhaps it would be better if all Jews did leave France, Aliyah sounds good to us, rather than complicate and becloud issue.