Battle Cry

This post has been mutilated. Written long ago I cannot take the time to restore it.

Battle Cry

By

R.E. Prindle

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10212369520566491&id=1034444755

When did our national discourse become so consumed  with the state of our national discourse?  Rarely has so much public dialogue been dedicated to arguing over what can’t be said, who can’t say it and just how they shouldn’t put it.  It has always been politically profitable to frame your opponents’ rhetoric as irrational, cruel, even dangerous.  But our now-constant public skirmishes over speech have moved to another level entirely:  These days, the closer you can situate your opponents’ words to actual violence, the better.

When James Hodgkinson opened fire at a Republican congressional baseball practice in June—wounding Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana among others—he was killed in the attack and left no manifesto to explain his actions.  But the shooting immediately became, for many, a chilling example of the consequences of someone else’s rhetoric, and commentators raced to track down who that “someone” might be.

A Newsweek headline asked if “anti-Trump” rhetoric inspired the shooter…

Amanda Hess NYT

Magazine 8/20/17

 

Cc:  Johannes Rebhan, Alan Derian, Ian Hawke, Scott Rosen

Gentlemen:  In reply to your comments I had written a reasoned comment that attempted to deal with facts and historical opinion.  However, since reading your comments among others on Michael Sellers’ post of the last couple days of scurrilous ad hominems and defamation I didn’t think you deserved it while it would be futile as you refuse to answer arguments preferring to resort to slander.  Therefore I am going to tell you how you appear to an intelligent reader of your comments.

Scott Rosen is a mere thug with a mouthful of canards and insults.  In addition he is not so bright as he spells the Adolf of Hitler Adolph with a ph.  Scott is no longer welcome on my site.

Next, let’s consider Alan Derian.  His reply was very interesting because he cleverly manages to threaten me with dire consequences if I don’t fall in line without exposing himself to the casual reader as he says it is my choice whether I want to be beaten or whatever thereby exculpating himself.

His comment is very well composed, he obviously knows what he is doing.

OK, RE.  Before anyone else reacts to your last discussion about the science of the abilities of the races, let me address two points.

Here Alan admits that there is a science that addresses the relative abilities of the races.  This is an important point because he admits that there are races and that they have differing abilities. 

As an aside the Liberals on Seller’s thread always speak of scientific disciplines  as if that knowledge is wholly different and separate from other knowledge.  They speak of scientists as though they were a different race, almost alien, rather than merely someone whose specialty is physics or chemistry etc..  In point of fact anyone with the necessary intelligence can take up a scientific specialty although those who excel at them possess superior qualities and are few.

Scientific disciplines are one thing while the use of the scientific method is available to anyone and applicable to any task.  When I was in college we were told to not take the course information too seriously but if we got the method that was the point.  I got the method.  You Ian, although a fine fellow do not have the method although you have an overweening self-confidence in your opinions.

Alan then continues:

 

First, you are correct in saying that in Communist countries opposing speech was censored and how America is supposed to be different [exceptional] and allow free speech.  But that term “free speech” is a misnomer.  America has freer speech, it has a wide range (of) what kind of speech it allows, BUT, all countries, in order to survive, must enforce their core values and reject and suppress those who work to undermine those values.

As we all know, America is a diverse society of many cultures each vying for dominance. Aryan culture did not inhibit the speech of any culture or political point of view.  In other words whatever core values the Aryan society of the nineteenth century possessed and expected all immigrants to accept has now been split into competing cultures with different core values who wish to inhibit speech.  So, Mr. Derian leaves open as to which core values he is referring to.  As he here offers a tactic of the Jewish culture, which has no provision for free speech or conscience, it is obvious to which diversity Mr. Derian belongs and whose core values he wants to protect.

As Judaism is a semi-autonomous culture, as now are the Negro and Moslem cultures, while he seemingly speaks for Americans in general or universally his concern is for Jewish core values.  In the struggle for cultural supremacy the Jews at present are leading the rest.  Mr. Derian is also an Israeli citizen; a dual citizen who carries an Israeli passport or can obtain one but it is an important consideration.  One needn’t ask where his primary loyalty lies.

Now, these White demonstrators characterized as Nazis by Mr. Derian are specifically guarding the core values of the Aryan population of the US.  As Mr. Derian points out they must do this or be submerged.  The problem is that they are competing with Jews, Negroes, Moslems on the same basis.  Quite obviously they are the enemies of Mr. Derian and his Jews and vice versa.  Virtue is not the issue here as all are fighting for the same cause but who they are.  There is no possible way of faulting the Aryans without faulting Negroes, Jews and Moslems.

The Aryans were also shouting, according to reports: The Jews will not replace us.  Given the competition for supremacy between the Jews and others this is a legitimate war cry.  They are also reported as shouting Blood and Soil.  As their core values, which Mr. Derian admits must be defended by any means necessary are based on blood as are Mr. Derian’s Jews as well as the Negroes, not so much the Moslems, and soil which means that as they are Americans they have no other soil to claim.  This is not the case with Mr. Derian and his fellow Jews.  Anywhere they hang their yarmulke is home to them.

Now, Mr. Derian says that ‘free speech’ is a misnomer and that in defense of a culture’s core values anyone who challenges them can be forcibly shut up by any means necessary.  This is strange, as Mr. Derian then invokes the Constitution of the United States which guarantees unrestricted freedom of speech as well as assembly and has been confirmed by the recent decision of the Supreme Court as a core value of the United States.  Mr. Derian is subjecting himself to a forcible rebuke.

He then quotes the words “all men are created equal” from the Constitution out of context and says that this is a core value that must never be attenuated as if a mere phase could be attenuated. He neglects to complete the sentence to: “in regard to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”  There is no reference to preference of certain people.  The rest of the sentence changes the meaning imputed by Mr. Derian as the evidence for all men being created equal makes it an oxymoron.  Quite obviously all men are not created equal as a certain percentage of births are stigmatized with often horrible birth defects.

Further, in the broader sense, Mr. Derian has already admitted that there is a science of racial differences which implies that all men are not only not created equal but those differences persist throughout life.   Thus, Mr. Derian is hoist by his own petard.

For Mr. Derian it is enough to impose his opinion on US law even though no laws support his points.

Thus while other countries have draconian laws to protect ‘their ‘ core’ values, one of which in most European countries is to never, never criticize the Jews or their interpretations of the holocaust and WWII or you will be put in concentration camps called prisons and have at least a portion of your assets confiscated.  It should be clear whose core values take precedence both in the US and Europe and that those values are not endemic to any European country.

The difference in the US, he says, is people might lose their jobs, that is, their means of subsistence, get screamed at by counter-protestors, that is, competing cultures, deprived of their core value of free, not freer, speech and otherwise to be made to feel bad. That is defamation, insults, directed hatred, which, one imagines are acts of tough love to bring the deluded in line.

To cap his climax Mr. Derian makes this dire threat, which one is led to believe is backed by the full force of the Jews and their auxiliaries.

Bottom line: all men are created equal.  Not all men are more or less created the same depending on your race, gender, sexual orientation, or religion.  Men.  Equal.  Period.  You either adopt that or you get crapped on.  Your choice.

So, Mr. Derian ends his diatribe with the threat that you either go along with his and the Jews’ program or they will fuck you over like you have never been fucked over before.  Your choice:  On your knees before your masters, slaves, or what happens to you you have brought on yourself.  Your masters are free of guilt; you have been warned.

So, American democracy has come to that.  The Jews are staged to replace Whites and the Aryan demonstrators were quite right to chant Jews Will Not Replace Us.  That, does however, remain to be seen.  The war is on, not over.

America First Is Globalism

America First Is Globalism

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Wall Street Journal continues to amaze.  Tuesday, May 3, 2016, p. A11, Bret Stephens posted to his column Global View what I imagine he considers a scathing denunciation of Donald Trump.  What Brett doesn’t seem to understand is that there is no particular virtue in globalism.  It is merely a state of affairs.  Donald Trump is a globalist, I am a globalist, we are all globalists.  We have to be, globalism is here and now.

If Bret believes that the Chinese don’t place China First, Africans don’t place Africa First and Moslems Moslems First he is dreaming fantastic dreams.  Trump says what everyone else is saying about their peoples; he is saying that yes globalism is here and in that context we have to place America’s interests before everyone else’s interests.  The White Man’s Burden has been laid down Bret; let that monkey ride someone else’s back.  In a dog eat dog’s world, Mondo Cane, one has to bark loud and bite hard not roll over and expose one’s tummy.  Those who roll over are called pussys, Bret.  No one respects them.  That is the situation our current leadership, so-called, has placed us.

The problem with you Bret is that you think your interpretation of globalism is the gold standard and there is no other interpretation.  Trump has bluntly stated the China First position:  they are raping America.  With impunity they hack our computers, take whatever information they want, as part of the cyber war.  We grouse but make no retaliation even though we have the means to shut their computers down.  To defend ourselves, if I interpret you correctly Bret would be a violation of globalism.

Further, China has no more respect for our borders than Mexico.  Chinese flood our country with illegals.  Bert apparently considers open borders ‘a reasonable immigration policy’.  Your opinion and your opinion alone Bert.  The better opinion is that no immigration at all is the most reasonable policy.  Your opinion is not sacred just because it is your opinion.   You are not the arbiter on immigration.

Bret insultingly says of Trump’s America First position:

Either Mr. Trump stumbled upon his worldview through a dense fog of historical ignorance.  Or he is seriously attempting to resurrect the most disastrous and discreditable strain of American foreign policy for a new generation of American ignoramuses.

You willfully misinterpret the phrase America First.  First does not mean only.  First means to look at international or global affairs considering one’s own welfare as paramount.  To impoverish ourselves to enrich others is the height of foolishness.  To use your example of England in WWII, the English if they had considered their own welfare first, would never have entered into WWII.  That war bankrupted them completely, impoverished them for a whole decade or more, left them a no-rate power and stripped them of their colonial empire and that with the connivance of FDR.

FDR himself stripped the US of its ‘inexhaustible resources’ in the short period of seven years, 1938-45.  He gave those resources away for free to enemies like the Soviet Union.  Stalin didn’t even say:  Thanks, Suckers; he said:  You got anything left? as he annexed the whole of Central Europe.

Neither England nor the US had any dog in the Nazi-Communist struggle so how were American Firsters disastrous and by whom were they discredited or, actually, defamed?  They couldn’t have been more disastrous then that fool FDR and they were discredited by those who wished the US ill.

Donald Trump probably knows his history better than you do Bret.  Better bone up on current scholarship; your understanding is outdated not Trump’s.

Who Benefits If Western Whites War On Eastern Whites?

Who Benefits If Western Whites

War On Eastern Whites?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

There seems to be a growing threat of violence between the NATO nations and the Russians.  Should such a war be forced between these two White sides who benefits?

Consider!  A couple decades ago the Negro Kamau Kambon on public television announced that genocide should be committed on Whites.  At the same time the Jew Noel Ignatiev then a full professor at prestigious Harvard University was touring US campuses delivering his sermon that Whiteness had to be eliminated from the planet.   This was with the full approbation of Harvard, he was never disciplined.  Ignatiev did this with the full concurrence of the Jewish establishment.  No Jewish voice was raised condemning him.  He was cheered wildly by campus audiences so they were apparently comfortable with their own extinction.

So, both Negroes and Jews want to see White people wiped from the planet.  All White people.  Genocide.

Consider again that many reputable scholars believe that the Jews began WWI and WWII in which Whites fought Whites with terrible carnage if not to extinction.  Thus if the Jews can foment another war of Whites vs. Whites it will be to extinction.

Since WWII Jews have been advocates of mass immigration to the US and Europe of colored and Moslem populations.  In the event of war not only would Whites be fighting Whites but Negroes and Moslems who have successfully invaded Europe and taken over in the US would be enemies within.

In the US Jews, Negroes, Moslems and Mexicans or Hispanics if you prefer would be internal enemies in the US.  Mexicans are already in revolt.  Who is President of the US?  The Negro Barack Obama who invariably favors his own Negroes and who are his apparent coreligionists the Moslems.

The Jews and Negroes are seconded by a large body of White Liberal Quislings in both the US and Europe.

So, let us ask ourselves why is the Negro Obama driving us toward war and who will benefit by such a war?  Neither the US or Europe are enemies of the Russians or they us.  Russia does not want war yet Obama is provoking the Russians to war as hard as possible.

Consider!  Obama has said that presidential candidate Donald Trump will never be president.  This is reputed to be a democracy so how could Obama prevent a duly elected Trump from being president.  What does he mean when he says Trump will never be president?  Only by violence, only by a coup in which he seizes the government permanently and prevents Trump from taking office.

We have been forewarned.  The Jews and Negroes want to see us dead.  They have the means to do so.  They have the will.  They are acting now.

I am reasonably certain that Trump will be elected.  What then will he do?  What will we do if Obama refuses to step down?

Well, arrest him.

Vote Trump or vote for your own extinction.  Those are your two choices.  Do the right thing, Vote Trump.

The US Mexican War Of 2016 Begins

US-Mexican War Of 2016 Begins

 

The Battle of Orange County Fairgrounds

By

R.E. Prindle

 

How far will the Mexican government go to prevent Donald Trump from being elected president?  Reports surfaced a few weeks ago of a determined campaign to register Mexican nationals occupying the US to vote against Trump.

One must ask the question is the Mexican government behind the military style action against the Trump rally in Orange County?  Here the combatants a paramilitary unit organized by the Mexican government to attack the Trump rally?

Combatants claimed that the streets belonged to them.  In other words they had successfully occupied US territory in their own eyes.  This must mean that whatever streets they have claimed are now a no-go zone for Americans.  The streets and the area they enclose are a Mexican national colony.  Indeed the paramilitary  troops arrived with Mexican flags flying.  Doesn’t that seem clear to you?

Who are you going to believe:  the Liberals or your lyin’ eyes?  Go for your lyin’ eyes folks.  The invasion is real.

Shouldn’t the Mexican consulates by closed and their staffs ejected?  Doesn’t it appear that the Mexican government is terrified that Trump will actually close the border disrupting their plans?  I’m sure they are.

Stop calling these military style battles riots; stop calling the paramilitary troops protestors.

This was the Battle of the Orange County Fairgrounds in an attempt to control the election in the neighboring country of the US.  Who is going to seat the next president of the US, Mexican paramilitaries or dedicated US citizens?  End no-go area now.  Regain control of the streets of America by any means necessary.

Invade Mexico

Race War Plots

by

R. E. Prindle

 http://bigstory.ap.org/article/735a3eb5ce0847e0abd6caff7144304a/federal-grand-jury-indicts-3-alleged-race-war-plot

In the news today from Larry O’ Dell of the Associated Press an article alleging a race war plot by three ‘White Supremacists.  As we all know the AP has a style manual that commands reporters to follow guidelines as to how to report ‘minority’ crimes and how they are to be referred to.  We also know that the media are very selective as to what stories are news.  Minority crimes are swept under the rug unless they fit the AP’s political agenda.  Nothing derogatory about colored races or non-Cristian religions.  When minorities commits atrocities they become domestic terrorists, true Americans running wild. 

However the same manual apparently tells reporters how to negatively depict Whites.  Whites are so inherently evil discriminatory hate laws had to be passed to control their supposed ungovernable rages.  Negro attacks in their race war against Whites have so dominated not so much the news but the internet for the last several months that the AP apparently thought it was time to report a horrendous White crime.  Bear in mind that George Soros the Jewish billionaire and trouble maker has been trying to stir up a race war for years.  Both the Jews and Negroes have been calling for the extermination of Whites for decades with no consequences for them.  Soros was personally responsible for the race war battle of Ferguson.  He has been active since dispensing large sums of money to keep things going.

In his case he has been declared person non gratis in Russia.  The groups he backs have been outlawed.  Putin says he they don’t represent Russian values.  Soros race war efforts apparently do represent the American values Obama so loudly proclaims, that’s the kind of people we are he says.  Soros should be persona non gratis everywhere on earth, a man without a country except perhaps Israel where his values are fully appreciated.  Why isn’t he unwelcome anywhere?

Both Jews and Negroes have committed real race crimes but in its search for White crimes the best the Associated Press can come up with is these White guys allegedly ‘planning’ to ignite a race war.  The whole things sounds like the usual Liberal script, just another piece of fiction.  These guys have committed no crime but are allegedly thinking about it.  Depicted as career criminals at what looks like seventeen or so, mere children, the trio display little criminal intelligence.  Over their alleged career of crime they have learned nothing.  Look at the pictures; it looks like the AP painted the mustaches on these teenagers in an attempt to make them look older.

So what is the penalty for ‘fantasizing’ shooting up or bombing synagogues and black churches.  For Christ’s sake Hollywood fantasizes blowing up the White House and reaches millions and no one accuses them of any crime.  When the White House finally goes up will they be held responsible.  Let’s see, that movie was made by Jews. No, nothing there.  Bombing synagogues and Negro churches?  There’s a first.  This begins to sound like a Jewish and Negro fantasy about evil Fascist, Nazi White Supremacists.

Just today we learn that a Negro female college student was fabricating death threats to Negro people in general while seeking celebrity status.  How seriously can we take any charges against White Men.  Review the record, all have been disproved.  No charges are anticipated against the Negro woman who certainly was trying to continue the race war against Whites with here nutty accusations.  No charges will be made against her.  No story there.

But,

The men-all of whom have extensive criminal backgrounds, according to the FBI and court records- are being held in jail without bail.’

 

Not the Negro college woman though.  Without bail! No crime has been committed, no synagogues or Negro churches bombed, not caught in the attempt, and their non-crime is priced beyond redemption.  Hey, we’re all domestic terrorists now.  Oh yeah, and the arch spy Jonathon Pollard who did steal thousands of classified documents has been released.

There is no law in the United States.

The Current Crop Of European And American War Criminals

The Current Crop Of European And American

War Criminals

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Following on the heels of the Parisian Massacre by the Moslems a second attack has been struck in San Bernardino in the US claiming fourteen or more lives and thirty-some victims.  The authorities have no notion of the motive.  We do.

The motive is clear to all but instead of acknowledging the attack as an act of war the Criminal in the White House rushes to call for a ban on firearms.  Guns are not the problem dear Barry, the problem is ideology.  Remove the ideology and the shootings, the bombings, the rapes, the murders will cease.  These attacks will not end until you accept that you are mistaken in your idiotic encouragement of these paramilitaries by importing them in their millions.  You must be insane.

You and your fellows in England, France and Germany are the true war criminals who should be removed from office and tried like the other war criminals at Nuremberg.

Your evil cohort in Germany, Angela Merkel, is knowingly encouraging the enemies of the German people while disarming the Germans making them defenceless.  Merkel is personally responsible for the rapes of these thousands of innocent women.  She should be given hundreds of life sentences to be served successively.

Hollande in France as well as the English idiot are no different.  They should be removed and tried.  Sarkozy with his moronic plan of forcing White women to sleep with Africans should be castrated, put on display and then shot.  Hitler was saintly compared to these criminals.

As for Obama his crimes are mounting daily.  He should be held responsible for each death in San Bernardino.  The problem was ideology not guns.  Remove the fellow now.  Escort him to the door.  He has already said that as long as he is in office he will bring in as many of these Moslem paramilitaries as he can.  Stop him now.  This is an emergency.

His supporters are no less guilty.  Why Congress is even discussing vetting or not vetting the paramilitaries is ridiculous.  Can their mouths form the words No Way?  No discussion, just NO WAY.  They too are guilty of the Berdoo shooting and the many that will follow as the season develops as no effort is being made to discourage the Moslems.   They are all guilty, don’t kid yourself.

Instead three White boys who have committed no crime but are alleged to be only ‘plotting’ retaliation are on their way to prison and long sentences for committing no crime.  Think of that!  They have committed no crime.  These men who have done nothing should be defended strenuously by any means necessary.

If we take no action in either case we have only ourselves to blame.

Why Dr. Strange Thinks Donald Trump Is Weird

Why Dr. Strange Thinks Donald Trump Is Insane

by

R.E. Prindle

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/24/donald-trump-might-not-be-lying-about-people-cheering-on-911/

 

When Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post I had high hopes for the paper believing that he would revolutionize the newspaper.  I was sadly mistaken; instead he has made it or allowed it to become more neo-con than ever.  Disgustingly so.

In an article that it is hard to believe any respectable newspaper would publish titled ‘Why Donald Trump might not be lying about people cheering on 9/11’ the paper has become both delusional and dishonest.

Donald Trump does not say he saw ‘people’, that is a crowd of diverse origins, cheering.  He said he saw Moslems cheering, which is correct.  In the article the Jew Max Ehrenfreund, Bezos and his writer Ehrenfreund choose to defame Trump.

Ehrenfreund writes:  …Trump’s assertion may not be a bold faced lie. [A native American would say bare faced.]  Psychologists suggest that people unconsciously fabricate memories all the time, and that Trump may have done the same.

Quote:

“I can’t say he’s not lying, said Deryn Strange, a psychologist at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. [Then was there any need to imply Trump was lying?]  But my research and the research of my colleagues certainly supports a more charitable interpretation:  that is that this is a false memory.”

Unquote.

Perhaps Dr. Strange and his colleagues, stranger still, should have researched 9/11 more thoroughly before delivering an opinion based on nothing.  I will accuse Max Ehrenfreunde of lying when he says the Moslems weren’t elated by the fall of the Twin Towers that they themselves destroyed.

In Portland, Oregon where I lived through that awful ordeal the Moslems were thoroughly elated, giving each other high fives, babbling and if not dancing down the Esplanade, where I viewed their spectacle, bouncing and waltzing along.  I had words with them.  Of course according to Dr. Strange I may be hallucinating as we do all the time according to him but I think Dr. Strange should have his license to practice revoked and be fired from his job.

I don’t know where or how Trump saw what he says he saw but I’m sure he saw it.  Bezos, Ehrenfreunde and Dr. Strange, their spokesman are dishonest.  Their intent is merely to belittle and defame a presidential candidate who differs from their deluded beliefs by intimating essentially that he is insane.

Shame on Jeff Bezos; shame on Dr. Strange; and shame on Max Ehrenfreunde.  Of course one expects nothing better coming from the synagogue.

Part III: Is Paris Burning?

Is Paris Burning?

Part III

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Anent the Moslem act of war in Paris in which perhaps as many as a thousand people were killed, maimed and injured not to mention the collateral damage to the thousands of related lives our Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has pointed out a significant fact.  European citizens are unarmed and defenseless.  They are intentionally being kept so by the criminally inept and incompetent Insiders in office.  Apparently these morons and incapable of understanding the trap they have put Europe in.

Upon a signal no different than the one in ancient Roman Alexandria and Cyprus in the second century when the Jews descended upon the unsuspecting people and murdered a half million the Moslems armed with assault rifles, grenades and who knows what weapons will be able to murder defenseless millions of Europeans.  This is what is known as a blood bath that will far exceed any so-called criminal WWII holocaust.  You had better take this seriously, untold misery is awaiting Europe.  Every European should be issued an assault rifle and ammunition at government expense.  They should be allowed to use it rather than seeing the African and Moslem barbarians rape European women and assault the men.  If the Insiders consider allowing them to do so unopposed is the rule of law then they should be arrested as accomplices.

Moslem rapists and murderers should be summarily executed by European paramilitaries.  This is war; no crimes are involved.  Trump is absolutely correct; his critics are fools.

As for the criminal Insiders they should remember the fate of Mussolini while no measures have been taken against the Moslem troops.  Hollande closed the borders, indeed!  Who does this nitwit think he’s fooling?

Instead he asks the French people to suffer their casualties in silence. Whose side is this nitwit on?  Instead of acknowledging those paramilitaries are soldiers engaged in asymmetrical warfare carrying the Middle East atrocities back to Europe he points out that one of the soldiers was a petty criminal.  In other words, this is just a crime rather than an act of war.  Get with it Insider idiots; they are not petty criminals they are soldiers foraging for supplies.  This is war Insider idiots and you are failed generals.  You are to be replaced and treated as criminal incompetents and hanged just as at Nuremburg.

As Donald Trump seems to understand the situation well,  it is important that we of the Outsider Parties see that he is elected.  He is our last best chance before street warfare becomes more imperative in both Europe and North America than it is now.

Gird your loins, my friends.

Part II: Is Paris Burning?

Part II:  Is Paris Burning?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

On Friday the thirteenth, that symbolic unlucky day, the Moslem paramilitaries unleashed a major assault on Paris killing, maiming and wounding perhaps close to a thousand unsuspecting Parisians.  The French security forces say they hadn’t a clue that a major enemy operation was planned.

The incredible response that no counter-attack by French citizens was to be permitted is cowardly.  This is an act of war not a criminal act.  No response is to be permitted…that means that any French citizens who do so will be arrested as criminals, sentenced and incarcerated.   The French Insider elite running France commanded the emasculation of French Outsider citizens in favor of the Moslem enemy forces.  No response?  Shame, shame on Hollande and his cowardly government.

The Insider moral reprobates still refuse to admit that a monumental religious war is being waged by the Moslems in which they aid and abet the enemy by their pusillanimous ideology.

We of the Outsider Parties of the US, Great Britain and Europe unanimously require the Insider Elites of the Aryan World including Obama, Hollande, Cameron and Merkel confess their incompetence and relinquish the reins of power to we Outsiders to conduct this war.  If they fail to do so they will find the Moslems a minor irritant to their continuance.

The Insider Elite have committed grievous crimes against humanity equaling those of Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot by allowing millions of the enemy to occupy key positions in all the Western States including the US and Canada.  Thus the enemy is in our very midst while we are unarmed, forbidden to act, where now death and carnage can be the only result.  This current Moslem assault is not the end of the war but only the beginning.  It is not a crime but an act of war.

The Elite morons are confounded by this act of war unable to comprehend it although tens of millions of more able and realistic minds have consistently pointed out the consequences of their action for decades.

The Elites response was to condemn us as bigots and ‘domestic terrorists’.  Down with them!  Upon abdication they will be treated as war criminals on the same basis as the Nazis at Nuremburg.

The have betrayed us and their responsibilities.

Step down now while ye yet may.

Part I: Is Paris Burning?

Is Paris Burning?

by

R.E. Prindle

An interesting thought exercise is to compare Paris under the Nazi occupation with that of the Moslem infestation of today and then marvel at what people are putting up with in the difference of perception.

Under the Nazi occupation there was complete order and safety.  There were no riots.  While the MSM is mum on the horrors the Moslems are causing in Paris and France they can be seen on sites such as Global Truth.  The destruction caused in the last decade or so is nothing compared to what is coming.  The heavy artillery is moving into Moslem hands, forget rocks.  AK47s, anti-tank weaponry, you name it; rockets to bring down planes, fighters or commercial, take your pick.

As in the United States where Negroes have occupied cities, Moslems have occupied French cities.  The French army, presumably manned by real Frenchmen, no Jews, Moslems or Africans, is preparing  for street to street fighting, if they choose to resist the takeover.  Those anti-tank weapons the Moslems have are going to come in handy.  Damascus come to Paris; Lebanon to France.

Well, the French asked for it, at least the Liberals asked for it, demanded it, the rest will have to endure it, try to survive it.  Once the shooting begins the borders will be blown wide open.  Moslem reinforcements have taken position in Germany.  The invasion of France this time won't be benevolent Nazis but crazed murderous Mohammedans.  Combatants will flow in from Germany to the East, probably Italy from the South and maybe Spain.  Maritime invasion across the Med into the Maritime provinces will keep the army hopping especially as insurrections will probably be nationwide rather than local while there will be no defined front.  Enemies in front, enemies behind.  Take a tip from me and sink the boats at sea, let 'em drown.  It is you or them.

Unlike Americans who all have weapons real French citizens are unarmed so that a slaughter of French citizens like the slaughter of Alexandrians and Cypriots during the Jewish War of ancient Rome will probably make even the European Holocaust look like child's play let alone the trivial Jewish holocaust.  All that guilt for nothing.

The hammer is about to fall, there will be no mercy, show none, it is kill or be killed.  If the Moslem insurrection succeeds in France then all Europe will be under siege.  Germany especially ought to arm its German nationals now in preparation for their Moslem uprising.  It is kill or be killed.  Man up laddies, lassies; forget that misplaced holocaust guilt; do what you have to do.

When the shooting starts let us pray that stray bullets take out the Liberals who betrayed you.  Is Paris burning?

Donald Trump: The Man On The White Horse

Donald Trump:

The Man On The White Horse

by

R.E. Prindle

 

This will come as no surprise of course, but according to Patrick Buchanan a serious movement to deny Trump membership in the Republican Party is afoot.  Denied as a Republican then the lineup at the next presidential ‘debate’ will be a lineup of non-entities.  Sorry all, but none of you have the qualifications for the big job.  Hence the Republicans are out of the race and the Republican Party is as dead as the Tea Party.  Where or where shall we be without John Boehner?

Trump will be cast adrift.  Is a third party an answer?  I don’t think so.  Even TR couldn’t pull that one out and he really thought he could.  However let us remember that Trump is a TV celebrity.  If he can be persuaded to get a team around him a la the comic book heroes The Blackhawks, or a group like the Beatles or Rolling Stones I think it is possible he could win as an individual leading the team, a movie star like Reagan, a hero, the lead singer.

I can hear you laughing but when you get through laughing consider the idea in a colder light.

Who trusts politicians?  Who believes politicians are interested in anyone but themselves?  What causes do they champion?  Tea bagging, hugging the guys?  Tough lesbian gals?  What politicians would you like to be like or have your kid grow up to be like?  None of them.  They’re useless.  I’m embarrassed by all.

Look at the movies.  Capt. America and his gang, the X-Men, these identities as ideals are what we want.  Honest, decent types who are willing to right wrongs, put things in order.

Trump, right now, is a virtual solo act, like The Shadow.  Captain America without the supporting cast.  Doc Savage, The Man Of Bronze without his crew.

A third party has never and won’t work.  If Trump doesn’t choose to run as The Man of Steel there will be no need for an election, just let the Democrats put their candidate in place.   Without Trump it’s all over now.  Get moving Donald.  Put together an organization.  Stand up and be the champion of America.

Time Is Wasting Our Past

Time Is Wasting Our Past

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The great fear is that the Western World will lose its past.  Certainly the Western past as we have known it.  Many factors are militating this loss.  Not least of the reasons is the transition from the mechanical to the electronic age.  Technological developments are severing or already have severed the Millennials from the America that was.  9/11 is a good date to begin the severance.

The literature of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries has little relevance to those born after 1980.  The literature of the nineteenth century is rapidly becoming as incomprehensible to younger people as Shakespearean or even Middle English.  The mores, especially the sexual mores, make so little sense to Millennials as to make the novels unreadable.  I would even guess that there are even those who have never seen live horses or cows.

No generation takes pleasure in what their forefathers did except for the odd ball romantics or historians.  This is even more pronounced today after the clean break of 9/11.  At eighty myself, I find most of my references falling on uncomprehending but polite ears.  ‘No reason to offend the old guy.’,  I can see them thinking as they smile blandly.  References even to Cary Grant elicit blank stares.  Bogart, who knows?  Thousands of movies have been made since either was on the screen.  Why should the young know?  They have their own lives to live.

Not only is the past incomprehensible, it is so vast.  How could any new person be aware of the ephemera that makes up a mature person’s life?

This past so important to them whether they know it or not is becoming incomprehensible just as the open door immigration policy floods the country with unassimilated if not unassimilable people whose cultures are given preferential treatment, claimed to be better that those young natives’ own. 

Sports have been given over to the Africans, records to world music, book publishing concentrates on immigrant stories and the shaming of Whites.  Restaurants offer every national cuisine on earth while American cuisine is despised and European cuisines with the exception of Italian demonized.

Global ‘diversity, is emphasized to the disparagement of ‘dead White men’ and the culture they thought they had provided for their heirs. What is left for young Whites?

In point of undeniable fact genocidal plans are being laid for the elimination of ‘Whiteness’ from the earth without any resistance from the Whites.

So, what is gone, is gone.  It can’t be brought back or even revived for a moment. It’s gone, but the future lies ahead.  Rather than lament it is necessary to salvage the laws and mores, the customs, the thought that gave Aryans their supremacy over the less evolved.  The challenge of the future in this Darwinian struggle for survival is what race or species will emerge supreme on this overcrowded planet?  Make no mistake it is time for some few billions to go.

Will it be African Supremacy?  Semitic Supremacy, either Jewish or Arab?  Chinese Supremacy?  Or will Aryans realize finally the nature of this primeval struggle beyond morality and reassert White Supremacy.  Perhaps winning the battle is the highest morality.  I think so.

The choice is suicide, go under quietly, or Conquest, assuming our rightful place in the racial hierarchy.

This is serious:  Let those be offended who will be offended.  What is that to us?  Being offended never caused anyone any harm.  I’m offended by what I see and hear constantly as you should be too.  Don’t be offended; get to work and set things right.

Baltimore And Grim Realities

Baltimore And Grim Realities

By

R.E. Prindle

 

It is time we pause and locate our position.  The compass is spinning too fast to pinpoint where we are.  What should be clear is that while we weren’t paying attention there were those moving populations about maneuvering for position.  While people fantasized a country in which three or four States were turned over to the Negroes as their homeland a different vision was occurring to the Negroes and their Jewish handlers.

E. Michael Jones in his Slaughter Of The Cities demonstrates how old ethnic neighborhoods in cities like Philadelphia and Detroit were broken up and moved out to be replaced by Negroes.  Jones blames the Northeast Protestants for destroying these Catholic enclaves of Irish or Poles and he may be right or partially right, don’t forget those handlers.   At any rate the inner cities were delivered to the Negroes.

In possession of the cores the Negroes immigrated into the cities and multiplied slowly capturing a majority position in nearly all the major US cities East of the Mississippi.   With a majority of votes they captured the governments of those cities which have all been mismanaged; Detroit being the first of the paradigm.

Today, as in Detroit decades ago, St. Louis recently and now Baltimore they are asserting autonomous ownership demanding to impose a Negro legal system reflecting their own African mores and the ethnic cleansing of all Whites.

They are in possession of the turf.  They are not capable of governing today any more than they were in the days of the First Reconstruction, for this is the Second Reconstruction.  At that earlier time the Southern Whites fought back reclaiming their heritage.  Today the Whites are cowed making more concessions than Roosevelt did to Stalin.

They haven’t even the backbone to say:  What is this shit?  They merely say:  What else can we give you and do for you?

So the cities belong to the Negroes.  The past of White Supremacy hasn’t even left a shadow.  Concessions have all been conceded, the next step after the White supineness we are witnessing is actual voluntary servitude and from there the ultimate Negro triumph, enslaving the Whites.  Psychologically this is half done.

The Liberals are well on the way of putting on their chains.  Let them, but why follow them?

Whites must realize the situation and cease to cater to the Negroes.  Are they not men and women?  Cannot they stand on their own two feet without our help?  There is no need to incur expense we can’t afford to call in the National Guard to suppress the insurrection of Baltimore.  Let it rage.  We don’t need White Boys to restore order.  Let the cities burn, send in agitators to encourage the lawlessness.  Not only let but encourage them to kill each other.  What do those crimes mean to Whites. Nothing.  Why waste money and White skills in hospitals.  They did it they can cure it. 

Why go the expense of rebuilding the wreck they create.  Let them live in it.  Make them.  Refuse to let them out of their consecrated ruins.  Whites can’t even live their own lives why should they try to tell Negroes how to live theirs?

Sever the umbilical cord that links them to you.  Cut it.  If that can be done then while the Negroes are festering in their ruined cities the next step to solve the problem can be determined.

Forget all that slavery nonsense.  Let the dead past bury its dead.  Whatever was has ceased to exist with no commitment or guilt.  The Negroes cannot be saved.

SOS.  Save Our Selves