Thoughts On Mr. Bezos Pecker Problem

Thoughts On Mr. Bezos’ Pecker Problem

by

R.E. Prindle

https://medium.com/@jeffreypbezos/no-thank-you-mr-pecker-146e3922310f

Let’s keep the ball rolling on this issue that Mr. Bezos has brought to our attention.   We have little idea of the behind the senses activity so we can only deal with what is public.

It seems that the Mr. Bezos owned Washington Post has been attacking Mr. David Pecker’s publication the National Enquirer, itself owned by a corporation calling itself AMI.

The sin of the NE as identified  by Mr. Bezos is being in contact with Saudi Arabia.  This seems strange as the Saudis are publicized as one of our stalwart allies, second only to Israel.  It is difficult to see the offence  even if it relates somehow to Pres. Trump.  Yet this seems to be the basis of Mr. Bezos’ and the WP’s complaint.

There does seem to be some involvement with government investigators between Mr. Bezos, the WP and the Mueller outfit.

Mr. Bezos make this incomprehensible statement:

Quote:

Federal investigators and legitimate media…suspected and proved that Mr. Pecker has used the Enquirer and AMI for political reasons.

Unquote:

I have always held Mr. Bezos in high regard for his unbelievable commercial success but here he makes the incomprehensible statement that it is wrong that newspapers have political reasons in publishing.  Has Mr. Bezos never heard of the Editorial page?  Are not stories and their characterizations used for political purposes?  Do not newspapers endorse and recommend their favorite candidates?  Good Lord, doesn’t Mr. Bezos own the Washington Post and use it for defaming Pres. Trump.

Actually, he does know it.  (One wonders if Mr. Bezos doesn’t also own the Medium site,  the site on which he chooses to expose himself.)  Mr. Bezos calls his ownership of the WP a ‘complexifier’.  In other words it compromises him.

Quote:

Even though the Post is a complexifier for me, I do not regret my investment.  (The Post loses tens of millions of dollars a year; some investment.  More a vanity and/or political project.)

The Post is a critical institution with a critical mission.  My stewardship (note the word) of the Post and my support of its mission, which will be unswerving (and) remain unswerving…

Unquote.

Very well, but can’t Mr. Pecker say the same about his relationship with the National Enquirer.  Is the NE really any less legitimate than the WP?  Is Mr. Bezos mouthpiece any less reprehensible in its political ‘mission’ to discredit Pres. Trump?

Mr. Bezos then says:

Quote:

Back to the story:  Several days ago, an AMI leader, (Editor I presume Mr. Bezos means) advised us (us being whom?) that Mr. Pecker went  “apoplectic” about our investigation.  For reasons still to be better understood, the Saudi angle seems to be a particularly sensitive nerve.

Unquote.

Why should it?  Didn’t Pres. Obama make an obsequious bow from the hip while place his hand in the Saudi king’s hand as a sign of fealty?

There we have the crux of the matter.  Mr. Pecker’s counter attack.  Apparently fighting back is not kosher to Mr. Bezos.

After having been married to a lovely lady for twenty-five years, and building the most successful gigantic business on the planet Mr. Bezos decided he needs a hot babe and so he went out and bought one (for lack of a better word) not only that he bought a married one.

In this romance Mr. Bezos, who is perhaps one of the top ten tech wizards in the world inexplicably sent and exchanged pornographic photos with his Hot Tamale.  These emails and photos were then given or sold to the NE.

Mr. Bezos believes that the Pres. somehow hacked them.  Where they came from is beside the point but the NE categorically denies they got them by hacking.  Using Occam’s Razor the most obvious suspect is the Hot Tamale.  After all if you had bagged a guy worth 150 billion dollars wouldn’t you want the world to know?  What Hot Tamale wouldn’t?  Anent that we have heard no objections from the husband and no filing for divorce.

In frustration the NE tried to negotiate with  Mr. Bezos offering to squelch publication if he gave up his unwarranted persecution of them on the WP.

Mr. Bezos chooses to call this offer extortion and blackmail.  Mr. Bezos will hopefully pardon a knowing smile on our part.

One wonders at what strategic moment Mr. Bezos will choose to announce his candidacy for President of the United States.  I think you just killed your chances, Sir.

The Future Of President Donald Trump

The Future Of President Donald Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Democrats are in a bind.  They have a president they despise who if he is allowed to succeed will destroy their whole agenda.  Not since Herbert Hoover defeated their designated candidate, Al Smith, have they faced a bleaker future. 

The Democrats had captured the presidency  in 1912 when a divided Republican Party was defeated by a decidedly minority candidate Woodrow Wilson.  Wilson recorded only slightly more votes than an almost equally split vote between the Party candidate, Taft, the insurgent candidate T. Roosevelt.  In other words the combined Republican vote was a landslide endorsement of Republicans.

Wilson, as any Democrat, was sure that God’s own wisdom flowed through his brain.  He thought himself virtue incarnate.  Sure that he was the only one able to guide the nation he intended to run for a third term in 1920.  His connection with God’s brain was  severed when his own was paralyzed by a stroke.

The Democrats had no good backup candidate so the Republicans waltzed in with a candidate little more popular with the Dems than our own Donald Trump, Warren G. Harding.  Harding, like Trump, refused to follow the Liberal agenda while restoring prosperity to the nation.

Harding died mysteriously, succeeded by his colorless VP Calvin Coolidge who was thought to be a sure loser.  Contradicting the pundits Coolidge surprised, capturing the presidency on his own.  His presidency was known was known as the phenomenal Coolidge Prosperity.  A New Era with a car in every garage and two chickens in every pot.

Coolidge chose not to run for re-election and that brought Herbert Hoover, one of the greatest of Americans, to the fore.  He easily routed the Dem Al Smith.  Prosperity, a Republican prosperity, was at its peak.  If that continued it was certain that Hoover would be re-elected and after him probably another Republican for another eight long years.  The future looked dim for the Dems.

Only a great economic disaster could bring the Republicans down; the Federal Reserve easily handled that, engineering the Stock Market Crash of 1929. while others interfered with Hoover over the next three years preventing his ability to pull the country from the Great Depression.  A then nearly, or actually, incompetent Democrat by the name of Franklin Delano Roosevelt took Hoover’s place thus keeping the country in Depression for seven long years and then he dragged the country into a totally destructive war that could easily have been avoided and next he blew the peace.

Thank you, Democrats.

In our time the Democrat Barack Obama led the country into a ruinous situation attempting to abort capitalism.  The Dems under Obama had all but succeeded and would have succeeded if Hillary Clinton had not been out maneuvered by the unexpected and unwanted candidate, Donald Trump.

Now, as with Warren G. Harding, it appears that President Trump is leading the country into a prosperity to rival that of the Coolidge prosperity.  The fear of the Dems is that if allowed to succeed Trump will be reelected while the future may be lost to the Dems for twenty years or more.  They cannot let this happen.  Thus, they may plunge the country into another horrendous depression to discredit the President as with Herbert Hoover or, failing that, an assassination as with Warren G. Harding.

They have furiously dug a hole for themselves in trying to set up some sort of impeachment process even though the President has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors.  The whole charge seems to be that he was not their chosen candidate and had no right to win.

In an attempt to weaken the President they are now going after a key advisor Steve Bannon trying to discredit him in the President’s eyes and divide him from the President.  This must not be allowed to happen.  No machination against the President can be allowed to be taken seriously.  An uncritical foul must be called as an instinctive reaction.  Smear the Dems back.

Track down every Dem elected or candidate and expose their peccadilloes, sexual or economic, they all have them.  Unprovable sex violations have proven to be most viable as witness  the Republican Roy Moore of Alabama.  Go after their wives, many affairs are hidden there.

Be aggressive not passive, this is a war to the end, attack and defend simultaneously.  Be anonymous if possible.  Deny everything.

Steven Bannon Attacked by Doug Irwin! Get It While It's Hot.

w

History Good And Bad:

Steve Bannon Attacked By Doug Irwin

by

R. E. Prindle

 

Hot stuff in the WSJ today (7/20/17).  Douglas A. Irwin contributed a piece he titled Steve Bannon’s Bad History.  Doug is apparently a big deal from Dartmouth with several learned tomes dealing with free trade to his credit.

Through no fault of his own his fame had escaped me till now.  We have a clever double entendre in his title.   It can be interpreted as Steve has a malodorous past or, as the article makes clear, a weak grasp of history.  From the title I thought the former but fortunately I sought further enlightenment in the body of the piece and learned differently.  Is that called research?

Doug is critical of Steve’s ‘faulty’ thinking concerning the tariff issue.  His highlight blurb blazons, ‘Immigration and rapid industrialization – not tariffs – made the nineteenth century economy great.’  I take exception to the blurb.

While it may be arguable, the modern economic nineteenth century didn’t begin until after the Civil War.  And the economy wasn’t that great in the remaining thirty-five years of the century that included the near collapse of society in the crash of 1873, and that was worldwide,  and the equally horrendous crash of 1893.  Between the two of them they consumed at least ten of the thirty-five years.

However, even with 1873 and 1893 the industrial base expanded enormously.  Time were tough but not for everybody.

Immigration and rapid industrialization can also be written as cheap unskilled labor and amazing scientific and technological discoveries.  The century or latter part of it was built on steel rails and high powered locomotives and starvation slave wages paid for unskilled labor.

 

I’ve been working on the railroad,

Sleeping on the ground,

Eating saltine crackers

Ten cents a pound.

 

Causes for great pride and no pride at all.  History is uneven.

The tariff that restricted European competition, the rest of the world was of no account at the time, facilitated rapid growth as it provided the sufficient profits to develop industries.  Believe it or not the US prided itself on its high wage structure, immigrants and underpaid unskilled labor aside.  Somebody had to buy all that wonderful stuff.  Short life light bulbs weren’t all that cheap.

Doug may think tariffs didn’t help but, perhaps he should tell that to the current Chinese.  They don’t bother with tariffs they just forbid foreign competition as they build up their industries often with pirated technology.  As Doug ought to know the Chinese are famous for hacking computers and stealing trade secrets.

I know it is politically incorrect to point out these obvious facts but, what the hell, the truth is the truth.  But, no defense.

Steve’s history may not be all that good but it may equal Doug’s.

Trump Vs. The Autocrats

Trump vs. The Autocrats

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In a passage thoroughly Wilsonian, serving his purpose of stirring America to fight by citing German plots, intrigues and crimes… he cunningly served his other purpose by adding that these crimes were committed only by the German Government – “their source lay, not in any hostile feeling or purpose of the German people, who were, no doubt, ignorant of them.”

Mark Sullivan, Our Times,

Vol. V, Over Here, p. 283

 

This essay follows the thought, both written and implied, of the great social historian Mark Sullivan from Vo. V of his great work, Our Times.  Vol. V is perhaps the most thoughtful and serious of the six volumes.  When I say implied I mean that Sullivan either didn’t know or drew back from the obvious conclusions.  The changes America went through during the war years make somber reading.

While Sullivan doesn’t say that President Wilson was the most devious of all men yet the portrait he paints is of the most devious of men.  Certainly his friend Theodore Roosevelt, of whom Sullivan was something of a confidant, thought so.  TR considered Wilson the master of weasel words; he gave with one word and took back with another.  Sullivan’s conclusions agree with the opinion I had previously formed of Wilson.

The above quote is an example of the ambiguity of Wilson’s expression as he clandestinely prepared America for entry into the European war after campaigning scarcely a year before that ‘he kept us out of war’ with the implied assurance that he would continue that policy.  This was after the Germans proposed a ceasefire and a peace settlement among the combatants in 1916, about the same time that Henry Ford was setting out on the much ridiculed peace mission aboard the Oscar II,  that Wilson rejected because he wanted to be the key peace maker and establish the League of Nations.

As the US was technically a neutral they would have had no place at the conference table.  The Allies rejected the offer anyway.  That was a case where the governments and the soldiers probably would have disagreed.

Having now a firm objective in mind Wilson ordered mobilization shortly after and declared war on Germany.

As the opening quote shows he thought of himself as declaring war on the German government that he set somehow apart from the German soldiers actually fighting the war.

Now, Wilson’s own government was no longer ‘of the people, by the people and for the people.’  His was an authoritarian government granted unlimited dictatorial powers backed by the full force of law that began the long transition to what we have today.  A government over the people essentially considered as nonentities, deplorables as that country hick from Arkansas, Hillary Clinton, described us.  Sub-humans, people completely separated from our governors or masters.

Thus Wilson placed himself on a par with the Kaiser, although he would never have admitted it.  His treatment of the American people was contemptuous.  Make no mistake, war was declared to gratify Wilson’s ego; the welfare of the American people was in no way involved.  With that in mind Wilson trampled on American freedom, perhaps this was the New Freedom he had proclaimed.  He had obliterated American liberties opening the way to the supra government that followed in 1921 with the founding of the Council on Foreign Affairs, unelected then and unelected today.

As in WWII in which nearly the whole of American manhood was conscripted to craft social experiments, sixteen million men when half that number would have been excessive, Wilson built a huge army of many million men when only two million were ever sent to France.  This was obviously meant to regiment the country into one unit, one state of mind.

Wilson was socialist and as soon as war was declared under cover of that conflict, socialism was surreptitiously imposed on the American people, not different by much from that of Soviet Russia.  The railroads were nationalized.  Was that necessary?  No more than having millions of men in what were little more than concentration camps learning to think act, and dress alike.

The War Industries Board went great lengths toward nationalization of industry.  One man, a czar, Bernard Baruch, was put in charge with unlimited powers to organize the whole of American industry into one unit.  Fairly difficult in Wilson’s time it was much easier twenty years later during Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s time in WWII.

Perhaps Mark Sullivan, writing in 1933, saw it coming.  Perhaps Our times was the first warning flare, a star burst shell illuminating the future for a brief moment in time.  Certainly FDR was a disciple of Woodrow Wilson who by the United Nations, whiffed past the American people with no vote, succeeded where his predecessor failed.

Certainly FDR, having served Wilson, was in a position to learn from his mistakes.  While the point is argued, just as Wilson was a socialist, so too was Franklin Delano Roosevelt although he disguised it better.  Either that or the ground had been prepared by Wilson so as to be less noticeable under FDR.

So too was Barack Obama a socialist who emulated his hero FDR to the best of his abilities.  Obama’s administration was in complete defiance of the will of the American people.  America was not socialist.  Without the aid of financially dependent immigrants and his own Negro people Obama could not have been elected.  Without the supra government’s control of the media and the control of Congress through the ‘donor class’, he also could not have been elected.

Thus, Wilson’s great achievement was separating the government from the people.  The Government would no longer reflect the will of the people but the will of the people would be subject to the will of its governors.  Thus we live under a totalitarian government whose members have benefited from experience and learning so that it disguises its brutality under legal forms.  It is our duty to not only resist our enslavement but remove the slavemasters.

The case in point is that of our elected president Donald Trump who was elected against the will of the supra government and who they are quietly reducing to a cipher.  He will be removed so slickly it will almost be unnoticed.  Stand up now or live on your knees forever.  The times they are a changin’ so fast there is no time to think.  Act now.

The Distance Between

The Distance Between

by

R.E. Prindle

The Wall Street Journal recently published an article by a French writer called Bernard-Henri Levy.  As the name indicates Mr. Levy is a Jew.  In France therefore he is a privileged character.  As might be expected Mr. Levy is attacking President Trump for his position on responsibility for the violence at the Charlottesville assembly of Conservatives objecting to Liberal policies banning historical memorials , traditions and history of which they disapprove. 

Mr. Levy reflects the pervert threat of the Liberal assault on any dissenters to the Left.  We now learn that the Antifa criminals were protecting Western ‘core values.’  Any crimes are to be permitted when the Left’s ‘core values’ are under question.  Not strangely these ‘core values lead to the diminishment of the Aryan race.  Hence, as the Left characterized the assembly to be of White Nationalists, ‘neo-Nazis’, and White Supremacists any means necessary to disrupt them were legitimate.  This is the neo-holocaust; the Right  are the neo-Jews.

It seems that Western leadership has now passed to the EU bypassing the US and Russia.  It is safe to assume that the ‘core values’ of the EU are the gold standard to which we are all meant to comply.  The US Constitution is to be swept aside.  What is the primary ‘core value’ most highly prized by the EU?

If you guessed freedom of speech, freedom of assembly or conscience you are not only not living on this planet but not even in this universe while it is not yet clear that any other universe exists despite the sci-fi writers and their parallel universes.  Here’s looking at you in the Great Beyond, H.G. Wells.

Forgive my burst of exuberance. No.  The top and most essential ‘core value’ in Europe is nothing like what we value in the US.  The big ‘core value’ in Europe is the supremacy and well-being of the Jews.  Expect the next step to be the establishment of Hebrew as the lingua franca of Europe and hence by extension the US.  For now, it is a crime punishable by imprisonment, and the European prisons are full of people who let a chance phrase slip, and expropriatory fines to displease Jews in any way.  One must first ask, what is the Jewish view on what they call the holocaust. The view is a  reflection of Stalinist USSR.  Deviate from that and it’s jail time and loss of assets.  What is the official Jewish view on WWII?  Deviate from that and ditto.

Thus the Jews have obtained primacy in Europe legally.  And so they are trying to achieve supremacy in the US.  Now, at Charlottesville what were the conservatives said to be chanting?  It was ‘The Jews shall not replace us.’  Quite justifiably so, I might add.  What ‘core belief’ then did the assembly violate by claiming its independence from Jewish subjection?  The supremacy of Jews disguised by the seeming benevolence of the slogan:  All men are created equal.  Period. Or else, prepare to be crapped on.   The Conservatives were crapped on.

No democracy involved, no freedom of speech or conscience, no rule of law.  The Jews are a theocracy along with their Semitic counterparts the Moslems who are also trying to subordinate the Whites.

What then was Pres. Trump’s faux pas that Mr. Levy condemns and why was it a faux pas?    His faux pas was that of the ‘moral equivalency’ of placing blame on both sides.    Thus, even though the Masked Black Ninjas of the Left were solely responsible for the violence.  They had only one reason to be in Charlottesville and that was to disrupt the assembly.  But, in attaching blame, essentially on the Jews, the Pres. was disregarding our ‘core values’ around which ‘taboos’ are being formed.  In other words, he was violating the revolution hence becoming a counter-revolutionary and therefore placed outside the protection of the law.  The greatest sin in the eyes of the left.

The Wall Street Journal has shown its allegiance by giving space to the Left-Jewish spokesman Bernard-Henri Levy.  The WSJ should apologize to its readers then go forth and sin no more.  If they don’t  our curses will follow.

The Left And Hate

A Sense Of Proportion:

The Left And Hate

by

R. E. Prindle

 

 

After decades of oppression a few White people, so few we’ll call the them the Tribe, were standing up in a very mild protest, a mere assembly to discuss their grievances.  This pitiful response was met by the highest indignant hatred by the Leftist oppressors.  A slave revolt, my God!!

The recent assembly of the White tribesmen taking place in Charlottesville was met by a perfect storm of hatred and violence. As has been explained by the Left they have virtuous ideals, at least in their own minds, while the Tribe essentially have no ideals at all so that it is just that the Left hate them and physically abuse them while it is unjust for the Tribe to defend themselves.  Indeed, the Tribe ought to be deprived of all rights, excluded from the community of mankind.

This is backed by the full force of the authorities who are Leftist themselves, thus, the police by doing nothing, standing down, aided the Leftists who were superior in numbers to the Tribe.

The President of the United States, Donald Trump, refused to wield the full force of his office in condemnation of the Whites, saying instead that the Left was equally to blame for the astonishing level of brutality reminiscent of the street battles between the Communists and Germans in Weimar Germany.  For taking an equitable position the President was savagely attacked by the Left controlled media that came down on him like that often mentioned ton of bricks.  Dishonest, disrespectful, discreditable.  It was a hatefest by those who most condemn hate.  Looking at you ADL, SPLC.

There was a strong reaction to the response of the Left by that remnant of Americans who remember ‘the kind of people that we are.’

Thus, in a subsequent gathering of the Tribe in Boston the media completely ignored the Tribal assembly while concentrating on the thousands of rent-a-crowd of what the media called the counter-protestors who in their numbers shouted down the Tribe forcing them to abort the assembly.  This is called ‘our democracy’ by the Left.  But, shamed by their outright criminal Charlottesville performance the Left had left their baseball bats and offal at home preferring a different kind of violence nevertheless.  Hostile, hostile, hostile.

Then the Left gloated that while only a few Tribesmen showed up those who hated the Tribe turned out in thousands.  The media apparently believe that they are saying something however they conceal another arrow in their quiver—the Blacklist.

If a Leftist counter-protester, say middle management were identified in the ruck he would be congratulated at work for having a ‘social conscience.’

If a Tribesman, middle management, were identified as an assembler he or she would be fired from their job and be blacklisted forever.  He or she wouldn’t even be allowed to deliver the New York Times.

Let’s just say coercive forces were in operation to prevent the Tribal opposition from expressing any opinion in opposition.  Trump supporters have even been fired for saying they voted for Trump.

When it comes to hating and blacklisting the Left Party of Love and Inclusion can’t be topped.

What Would Martin Luther King Say

What Would Martin Luther King Say

To This?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

An interesting matter was brought up today in the WSJ (8/12-13/17) concerning the making of the HBO series Confederacy.  The ‘alternate history’ story is based on the notion of a successful secession by the South and the continuance of Negro slavery into the present. I can only envision that the script would be conventional in the extreme and, hence, uninteresting. 

Disregarding the inevitable call for censorship by the professional Negroes what should seem clear is that slavery is not the issue.  Slavery of Negros by Negroes is or was a way of life for centuries if not millennia in their native Africa.  Indeed, when Mungo Park, the Scots explorer, made his walking tour of West Africa in the early nineteenth century he was himself taken captive and enslaved.  In his fabulous book “Travels In The Interior Of Africa’ he notes that he saw that seventy-five percent of Africans were slaves of the other twenty-five percent.  If that is accurate at all then nothing could have been less surprising than to find themselves slaves after transportation to the Americas.  The continuation of an existing situation can only be construed as normal.

Nor as bad as conditions may have been on the slave ships it was not much different than the ways Africans treated each other.

The quantitative situation was unchanged but the qualitative situation was.  Rather than being enslaved by their fellow Africans the title to them passed to an alien race, a race of marked differences, a White race and they were transported to virtually a parallel universe in which they had no bearings.  The environmental and political realities changed also.  They were no longer in a primitive timeless Africa but in a vibrant ever changing completely alien political situation in which the difference between themselves and their new owners was one of total inferiority  while economically the gap was unbridgeable.  Black and White.

In Africa the politics was more casual.  Slaves could own slaves, even become economically well off.  In the Americas they were essentially livestock.  Hence the resentment and antagonism of Africans opposed to the alien race, the unforgivable assignment in perpetuity to inferiority.

In Africa where Negroes remained the majority, accommodations could by sought and were achieved in which White supremacy was moderated and then finally expelled, although returning in a new guise.

So, when the final liberation in the US came with the Supreme Court’s Brown vs. The Board Of Education in 1954 it was clearly up to the Negroes to prove their equality by their performance.  Now nearly seventy years on there is little evidence to indicate African equality with, to them, the alien race.  Very frustrating, don’t you think.

Without the benefit of ‘Affirmative Action’ that pernicious White invention, a handicap of many, many points and the very solicitous consideration of White associates they show little equality.  Nevertheless their Liberal associates refuse to accept the obvious and demand that the alien race, that is the Whites, deny its inherent supremacy and demote themselves to an inferior position in the name of ‘social justice.’

It is demanded that the alien race deny the past and abolish history to the extent of destroying any and all monuments and symbols of that past in which African inferiority was so prominent, so inescapable.  Up to this point the alien race has acquiesced, although under duress of having their lives destroyed by objecting, but today when their very existential existence is being denied them White Americans have stood up and declared the social injustice of their enslavement to Africans.

 

Today is a glorious moment in world history to be cherished.  8/12/17 mark it well, make it a national holiday.  In Charlottesville the police declined involvement.  They were nowhere to be seen, hoping the Negro side, composed mainly of Whites, would beat the Whites down.  The Whites came prepared and one might say the first battle of this War for Independence is being fought.  May it continue to spread until the Liberal Negroid agenda is suppressed.

The Myth Of The Twenty-First Century

Red Octopus vs. The Nazi Hydra

 

Boring From Within

by

R.E. Prindle

The whole contest between the Red Octopus and The Nazi Hydra was framed on race.  The myth was that the evil White Man through no special talent of his own had seized the wealth of the world and subjected the colored peoples from who he stole.  Hence the White Man must be made to pay.  Pay with his life.

Thus all the colored peoples of the world are arrayed against the evil White Man.  IN the US the Democratic Liberal Party is home to the colored peoples and the sanctimonious White Liberal.  The next step in the myth was the White Man as the oppressor of Homosexuals and White Women.  The motto of the Octopus is Whiteness must disappear from the earth before justice can reign.  The plan of action is:  Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civilization has got to go.

The myth of the Devil White Man began to form in the wake of WWI and the revolutions and skirmishes that continued for several years.  WWII put paid to White Supremacy.  The Liberal Coalition that contained only a small minority of White men, and those mostly homosexual, began to organize and as a first attack selected the university system of the US.

The Red Octopus , regardless of their enormous crimes against humanity always considered themselves the virtuous Party.  The atrocities of two world wars cooled their ardor for violent action.  They chose to bore from within.  Always a tactic from WWI and before it now became more active.  The first all out assault was the so-called Free Speech Movement at the University of California at Berkeley.  The Free Speech Movement was the first Occupy assault.  A small faction of revolutionaries managed to shut the University down by occupying Halls and preventing the school from functioning.

The action was called the Free Speech Movement because Free Speech in America is a prime virtue.  Thus the slogan or name made the assault defensible as a virtuous action.  Of course, within the Red Octopus free speech had no place.  One either hewed to the Party line or were disciplined or worse.

The Berkeley assault was entirely successful and free speech disappeared on campus.  The Movement soon spread across the country, Columbia University of New York being the prime example but the whole Ivy League succumbed immediately.  Moving from Free Speech to race the lack of Negroes attending universities was then included in the list of grievances.  Race is another virtue thus reinforcing the impregnable virtue of the Movement.

The remarkable thing about the Movement was the complete surrender of college presidents and faculties. It therefore follows that the college administrations were complicit; they were sleeper agents already in place.  The first capitulations set the tone for all that followed.  Of course having arrogated virtue to themselves any opposition therefore was vile, and being vile anyone holding other views was discreditable.  They automatically became racists, anti-Semites, opposed to Blacks and Browns.

Soon they began to lose their jobs often for something they may have said in private or may have said or only reported to have said decades before.  To be accused was to be found guilty; no proof was needed.

Once the universities were captured and cleansed and the curriculums appropriated all else followed.

By the 2016 presidential election the stage for the coup to what was euphemistically called the one party system was set.  The Red Octopus would be triumphant.

However the Hydra becoming alarmed managed to put forward an able candidate in Donald Trump who moved to disestablish the Octopus and put in place a Hydra agenda.

The stage has now been set for the Clash of the Titans:  a global contest for supremacy between the Red Octopus and the Hydra.

 

To be continued…

The Red Octopus vs. The Nazi Hydra

The Red Octopus vs. The Nazi Hydra

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Back in the Red fifties when the term the Red Octopus was first used to describe Red efforts to seize what was humorously described as the free world we anti-Communists, as yet unnamed, were subjected to all kinds of abuse.  ‘A Red under every bed.’  Communists behind the curtains, Communists everywhere, etc.  They even wrote songs belittling us, the Chad Mitchell Trio’s John Birch Society.  We were denounced as conspiratorial maniacs.

Well, the Reds have more or less succeeded in their revolution, it has happened here.  Yet the Reds got used to being victims, they see themselves as downtrodden victims.

Victims need bullies.  Hence bullyism is a hot topic of the day.  There are only two kinds of people according to the Octopus, the righteous Libs and we evil bullies.  I, Evil Bully.  The term bully is too great a generalization lacking the human touch. A certain personalization is missing.  Thus in the twenties and thirties in reaction to Communism Fascism and Nazism also known as Hitlerism arose.

One would think that WWII put paid to Nazism and Hitlerism not to mention Fascism.  NO!  They lived on in the Jewish imagination and the Jews gradually convinced all Europeans and White Americans that they were in fact Fascists and Nazis while individually all Little Hitlers, Ugly Americans.  The Libs denied this as they considered themselves virtuous so they passed the buck to the deplorable Conservatives who eventually become the Nazi Hydra.

For out of that milieu a great conspiracy had slowly been developing in the mind of the Red Octopus, that of the Nazi Hydra.  Thus all societies everywhere have bifurcated  into Red Octopi or the Nazi Hydras.  At this point the tentacles of the Red Octopus cover the globe but in between the tentacles of the Red Octopus the Nazi Hydra exists.  If you locate one branch and lop off the head, while the Octopus seeks out other cells of this pernicious hateful conspiracy, the head grows back again.  It’s like anti-Semitism the Hydra must exist to prove the virtue of the Octopus.

And then, just when the Red Octopus thought the Nazi Hydra was successfully contained a head was growing quietly in the disguise of a TV buffoon, the mighty Donald Trump.  Throwing off his disguise the Hydra chief unlawfully seized the presidency of the United States of American from the chosen Hillary Clinton.

What had been scheduled to be a contest between the Bush Dynasty and the Clinton Machine became a free for all between the Hydra and the Octopus.  Not much of a contest to all appearances.  Mobilizing the forces of the free press and free media; a ferocious campaign was conducted in which the Hydra Trump was belittled and the Octopus Clinton enlarged.  The polls said Clinton would win.  To the ballot boxes!  And when the dust had settled and the smoke had cleared there was the Hydra standing on Home Plate while the Octopus had tentacles covering third, second and first but 3+2+1 didn’t add up to a four bagger.  Trump was president and Clinton was strumming her guitar and singing the blues, out of tune.

The Hydra couldn’t have won fairly said the Octopus.  The Octopus didn’t know how the Hydra had cheated but he had to have, it was the only way he could have won.  But how?  Ah, the Russians, the Russians are coming they manipulated the election, it was the only way he could have won.  But what proof was there?

To be continued…

Comey of the FBI

And The Dark Government

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Since Pres. Trump’s election a ‘Dark Government’ has become a topic of conversation.  There may indeed be a dark government, perhaps several.  Ex-Pres. Obama is making a fool of himself by leading one as he interferes with Pres. Trump’s administration.  Dark Government?   Indeed, maybe more than one.

The government of the US is a vast sprawling project where many duchies ruled by ‘warlords’ may exist.

Comey of the FBI in his congressional testimony may have inadvertently uncovered one, to which he belongs, the IC Community.  Intelligence Community of different agencies.  As Comey of the FBI describes it an IC agency had possible information of a salacious but unconfirmed nature about then Citizen Trump that occurred or may not have occurred, after all this was an unconfirmed rumor, many years ago.

The salacious, as we all know salacious means smutty, dirty, nasty, titillating, rumor was that Trump as a private citizen, completely unrelated to his present position, peed on a Russian prostitute in Moscow, Russia.  In the annals of perversity how horrible is peeing on someone?  American clowns gather on a hotel balcony beer in one hand and dick in the other and pee on a crowd below while laughing uproariously. 

As a sign of contempt in concert with fellow conspirators some guy gets behind a victim and pees on his pantleg.  That’s a big joke of the practical kind where only the perps are laughing.  There must be numerous more examples in the annals of peeing.  For all I know the government may at some time have spent a quarter million dollars to commission a study on the subject.

Nevertheless, the assembled chiefs of the IC Community gathered to discuss what to do about this unconfirmed rumor.  The IC could possibly have leather bound volumes numbering a hundred or more of unconfirmed rumors.  Who runs major investigations of unconfirmed rumors?  Apparently no one but the assembled IC chiefs of which Comey of the FBI was one.

Probably giggling wildly the assembled Chiefs have to determine who is going to carry the news from Langley to the White House.  Perhaps they spun a bottle to determine who but in any event the lot fell to Comey of the FBI.

Whether Comey ever gave the Pres. the news of the unverified rumor or not isn’t clear.  Comey in his testimony gives no indication of what the rest of his conversation with the Pres. was about because the Pres. out of the blue struck him dumb by asking where his loyalty lay.  Why did the Pres. ask him that?

Is it possible that Comey of the FBI had just relayed this salacious but unverified rumor to the Pres.?  Wouldn’t this cast some doubt about Comey’s loyalty in the Pres.’ mind?  Would it be unusual to ask:  Why are you telling me this?  How important can an unverified rumor be?

Let us suppose, I don’t know how he obtained the rumor, some Trump hating journalist learned of this, had this unverified rumor published.  Wouldn’t the word of the assembled Chiefs of IC calling it nonsense be enough to discredit the journalist and quash the rumor?  I think so.  There must be something deeper going on here.  In my opinion the reputation of Comey of the FBI is destroyed, not Pres. Trump’s.

A Review: Peggy Noonan: What Comey Told Us About Donald Trump

A Review:

Peggy Noonan,

What Comey Told Us About Donald Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

This is a review of the Comey/Trump Affair around Peggy Noonan’s WSJ article in the Wall Street Journal of 6/10-11/17.

 

First let’s put the Comey Affair into its set and setting.  The current Pres., Donald Trump has caused the greatest political uproar since the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  Roosevelt too was hated and vilified by what he called the ‘economic royalists’ that now hate Trump; different faces but same class.  Former Pres. Obama prior to the election stated that Donald Trump would never be president.  Trump’s political adversary, Hillary Clinton, thought her election in the bag only to find that the triumph went to her rival.

The news was crushing for these people who considered themselves an elite appointed by God to do His work.  Looking down on Trump’s base that they had given many derogative names such as the Deplorables, ignoramuses and whatever they now found themselves led by a man they despised personally who was the leader of this despicable mob of unwashed peasants, to use an antique term.

Their disappointed rage was so terrible that many government employees quit their jobs  while there was a near universal refusal by the remaining to cooperate in any way with the new President.  They put on their pussy hats and through a snit in the very streets.

Comey himself had a very questionable role in the election releasing potentially damaging information concerning Hillary Clinton.  The timing was suspicious.  Clinton was accused of much more damning activities than Trump is being accused of but that has been swept under the rug.  She is a Liberal.

So, while investigations have been going on for months and months now with absolutely no show of conclusive evidence, or indeed, any evidence at all, Congress chose to call a hearing at which the star witness was the FBI head who had already come up with nothing hence had nothing to report and in fact reported nothing.

So, really, what we have here is a show trial after the Soviet fashion.  Also what we have here are essentially fictional narratives meant to amuse and entertain.    Just before his appearance, Mr. Comey released publicly a seven page propaganda paper he titled:  Statement For The Record:  Senate Select Committee On Intelligence. 

Mr. Comey opens his short story, for that’s what it is,  with the words:

I was asked to testify today to describe to you of interactions with President-elect and President Trump on subjects that I understand are of interest to you.  I have not included every detail from my conversations with the President, but to the best of my recollections I have tried to include information that may be relevant to the Committee.

Reading this one comes to the conclusion that this meeting has no other relevance than perhaps a discussion of the Pres.’ personal habits.  Trumpian curiosities.  In other words, the Committee is frivolous.  Isn’t the real intent of the hearing to see if the Pres. is somehow criminally lacking.  Comey is the man who is conducting this investigation to find Trump criminally liable for something, anything; the Committee doesn’t care what just so long as they can get rid of him.  They think his election is a fluke and therefore doesn’t count.

And then Comey advises that he has carefully edited his testimony.  To give his edits credibility, apparently knowing that one day he was to be called to testify something about the Pres. he ‘took notes.’ Apparently Comey’s conversation with the Pres. was so far beyond Comey’s experience, and he is a man who should have seen everything, that:

To ensure accuracy I began to type (the conversation) up on a laptop in an FBI vehicle outside Trump Tower the moment I walked out of the meeting.

Hmm. An FBI vehicle outside Trump Tower?  Was Comey wired?  Was the FBI vehicle a surveillance truck?  Hmm.  Does the FBI have tapes of this meeting.  That might be illegal.

Sure, there are enough weasel words in those comments that mean Comey has effectively said nothing.  He has determined what the Committee wants to hear and presumably selected  the most juicy passages throwing the rest of the edits on the cutting room floor.  I wonder if Mr. Comey has ever been to law school where he would learn to talk in circles?

Now, Mr. Comey works direct for Mr. Jeff Sessions, Trump’s personally selected Attorney General and Mr. Sessions reports directly to Pres. Trump.  Whatever information that Mr. Comey uncovers should have been made aware to AG Sessions.  Was it?  And, if not, why not?  Sessions in his turn should have reported to the Pres.

But Mr. Comey does not speak through his boss Sessions.  No.  He says instead:

The IC (Intelligence Community) thought it important for a variety of reasons, to alert the incoming President to the existence  of this material, even though it was salacious and unverified.

Unquote.

I see, what we have is water cooler talk, a rumor jest and smirk.  In fact, the story that Trump pissed on a prostitute in Moscow several years ago.  One imagines the Committee members smiling inwardly at their recollection of the rumor.

As morally reprehensible as pissing on prostitutes may be, as a sexual perversion it is fairly common, even has a name:  Golder Shower.  And when it comes to minor sexual perversions, let the innocent stand up.

Wow, isn’t the country overjoyed by Trump’s exposure. (smirk, smirk, allusion intended.)

Now, perhaps I’m wrong but the FBI’s jurisdiction doesn’t extend to Russia.  CIA maybe, but not the FBI.  Yet, Mr. Comey was asked, not by AG Sessions but the Director of National Intelligence to deliver these remarks to the Pres.  ‘because the material implicated the FBI’s counter-intelligence responsibilities.  Oh.

And Mr. Comey said, holding up his right hand, this is the carefully edited selective truth, so help me God.

So, then, Peggy Noonan of the WSJ examines Mr. Comey’s selected and edited testimony.  Now, remember, Comey is no callow youth.  As Peggy describes him:

Whatever Mr. Comey’s reputation, and it’s mixed- an intelligent accomplished professional  who is plenty slick; state-of-the-art Beltway operator with an image of integrity, yet trailed with suspicions of slight smarm- he’s a careful man.

 

Then Peg quotes Comey’s relation of the face to face meeting on January 27, 2017 a week into Trump’s term of office when it might be said he is feeling his way in his new surroundings.  Already under extreme attack, rioting in the streets, hateful MSM media coverage,  Trump knows it’s going to be a tough haul.  Comey has had a questionable record prior to the election.  Sitting on this side of the screen I had to ask myself what Comey was doing?  What was his agenda?  Which side was he on?  His own?

Wouldn’t it be reasonable then for Trump to want to get a feel for where Comey was coming from?  We have Comey’s version of what he’s seeing in Trump but we don’t have Trump’s idea of what he’s seeing in Comey’s behavior.  The other side always gives balance.  What Trump does already know is that the civil service is up in arms against him, rabid Democratic Senators and Congressmen are obstructing every move he makes, if he jaywalks the MSM reports it as a major crime.  So is Comey working for him or against him?

The Pres. levels with Comey, according to Comey’s notes written down later when he has time to compose a narrative, the Pres. says:  ‘I need loyalty, I expect loyalty.’  Right!  Who doesn’t?  Damn right, he doesn’t need a smiling back-stabber; which is Comey, he wants to know, staring at him intently to capture his reaction.

This man of the world, Comey, this state-of-the-art Beltway operator, is struck dumb by Trump’s desire to know if he is going to back stab him or not.  Well, my God, Comey is speaking to Trump, the Liberals idea of the reincarnation of  Adolf Hitler.  Why wouldn’t Comey come to the conclusion that Trump was asking for a Hitlerian loyalty oath, hey?  It doesn’t seem he was to me, but what was Comey’s reaction to the simple statement of fact.  Why, Comey this Beltway operator was struck dumb.  This so far exceeded anything Comey had seen or heard deep in the Swamp of DC:  ‘I didn’t move, speak, or change my facial expression (No! He was a deer caught in the headlights)  in any way during the awkward silence (getting a little purple here) that followed.  We simply looked at each other in silence.’

Does anyone with experience and sense believe Comey’s reaction?  I don’t.  Trump didn’t ask for criminal collusion as Comey implies, he wanted to know if Comey was a back stabber.  All Comey had to say was I do my job without fear or favor from anyone.  I will deal with you with integrity.  I will not be influenced by the hatred that I know surrounds you.  I am not your man but I will protect your administration from any unlawful assaults.  You will have no reason to find fault with me.’

Bingo! That’s it.  What does Comey do, he says and I mean I do not believe him, that he froze in the headlights.  Some Beltway operator.

Peggy runs through the right or wrong arguments through the rest of the article.  Then gives away the farm.  She says:

Then again, a conservative intellectual with small town roots wrote, during the testimony, that he thought this might be a break point, a moment when Trump’s supporters would listen close and think he’s not so much like them, and not so different from the swamp he means to drain.  I myself don’t know.

Let me help you, Peg, didn’t you describe Comey as smarmy and slick at the beginning of your article?  Didn’t you say he was a state-of-the-art Beltway operator?  Do you not think us small town rubes saw that immediately?  Trump is doing his best against terrific odds and that is clear to everyone but Trump’s enemies.  No, we are not breaking, the deal hasn’t gone down, he may not survive the beatdown but he would still be a better man than all the people in the Swamp for all that.