The Civil War Never Ended

The Civil War Never Ended

by

R.E. Prindle

Note:  This is supposed to be humorous, but as they say in Hollywood, based on a true story. 

Considerable evidence exists to show that the Civil War began in England in 1066 when Big Bill Norman stepped ashore at Hastings with his hordes and pasted the natives.  The Normans, named after Big Bill known in those days as William the Conqueror but now edited to meet current standards proceeded to enslave the Anglo-Saxons who had been lounging around the area holding the territory for the Normans.  The Anglo-Saxons considered their enslavement a betrayal.  A fierce debate concerning this so-called betrayal is still raging.  The reader is invited to make up his own mind.  Get a few more facts first.

Over there in East Anglia, on the East side of England, this slavery bit, iron collars and all did not go down well.  A great deal of resentment was stored away.  This was before the days of psychoanalysis so it went into their unconscious but not all that deep.  This resentment blazed up in 1600 something when the East Anglians rose up and slew the good King Charlie the One.  Old resentments die hard and a lot harder than you think.  A lesson to be borne in mind.

The fight would have been contained on English shores but for the fact that the New World had been discovered shortly before Charlie’s head hit the basket, or he dangled, I forget which but when you’re dead how important is it?  Escaping Charlie’s and his dad Jim’s oppression, real or imagined, a couple decades before a largish body of East Anglians now going by the name of Puritans fled across the big water, much bigger then when boats were slower, while sometimes not arriving at all, to land on the sparsely populated shore that they named  New Anglia and that became New England.

Well, wouldn’t you just know it?  No sooner were they getting settled than this fellow Cromwell from Old Anglia killed Charlie and seized England.  Now the Anglo-Saxon ruled the roost and those damn Normans, now going by the name of Cavaliers, had to hightail it across the water too.

They now, in their turn, crossed over to the New World but veered South and formed the colony of Virginia, named after an English queen of doubtful virtue, don’t let the name fool you.  It’s true that Charlie was a Scot and not a Norman but as nothing was named after him in the New World, it didn’t matter.

So, now, here is one of the great overlooked facts of history.  The Puritans of New England were glaring almost eyeball to eyeball at the Cavaliers.  I have no doubts they would have gone to war right away if the older colony of New Amsterdam, now New York, Old York is North of East Anglia in the Old Country, had it not been blocking the way.

But there was blood in the eye of the unforgiving Anglians.  They stewed, their resentment festered.  Then the Norman’s enslaved some savage Negroes from Africa.  There, the Anglians thought, they went and did it again.  It was a habit not a one off.  But this time the Anglians were going to get those bastards and get them good.  Kill them all.

Well, to make a long story medium long the Anglos began working up a head of steam about slavery even though they were not pure themselves.  It wasn’t so much that they cared about the Africans, hell, they were just a bunch of savages anyway, but that slavery bit…if you know what I mean.  We was slaves too and we’re not going to tolerate slavery now.  If the Jews had been there in numbers it would have been quite a gathering of ex-slaves and slaves.  A monster convention.

So the Anglians whipped up the bloodiest war there ever was and by force of excessive numbers, conscripting a whole lot of people who didn’t have a dog In the fight, they drove Old Dixie down. Yes, sir.  They drove Old Dixie down.  If you think that was enough for the Anglians, it wasn’t.  They wanted to kill off the whole damn lot of those Normans, cum Cavaliers and any other White men who got conscripted, no distinctions.  Justice is justice, yes, sir.  Stern justice.  Remember that.  The field of Hasting’s will not be forgot although I don’t think it was mentioned at that time.  I just made an historical interpolation, that’s all.

Well, those damn Yankees would’ve murdered the Southern Chivalry for sure except for, if you remember, New York was in the way, as well as Pennsylvania that had been added later.  Cooler heads prevailed so the Yankees were reduced to imposing Reconstruction.  They stripped that Chivalry of all weapons and denuded them of all rights and then made them subjects of their former Negro, African, dark slaves.  Racist minds considered this an indignity, but the Negroes enjoyed it.

Yankee power would fade after a while and while Dixie didn’t rise again the White Folks would break their hold and bring their own heads level with their shoulders again.  After another little while they had a silent revolution that was called Jim Crow and regained control of their country.  Oddly enough they aligned themselves with their New England enemies and became the Democratic Party.  Republicans had left a bad odor in the land.

Now, where was I?  Oh yea, Jim Crow, believe it or not but the Rebs imposed Jim Crow on the whole of the United States.  Then Jim Crow came to a crashing end in 1954, no whimper there, when the Negroes and their Northern allies staged a bloodless coup, a legal decision called Brown v. the Board of Education, something like that.  Yes, sir, Jim Crow was over and the Liberal occupation of America began.  Another revolution of sorts.  Not unlike the first Reconstruction, the disenfranchisement of Whites began.  You was with ‘em or you was Nazis.  Yes, sir.  The Yankees and allies became the Party of Virtue while any who objected to the occupation was of the Party of Evil, styled Nazis after the Party that fought Communism in the Old World.

The Party of Virtue had it their way, no matter what Party occupied the White House until 2016 when the game went wrong somehow.  It wasn’t supposed to be that way but it was.  The Virtue Party has kicked against the pricks, refused to accept the voice of Democracy that said they had overstepped the bounds.  The Virtue party however became unvirtuous and would not accept the will of the country.  Democracy or no democracy they should have won, they thought and said, hell, they even rebelled in the streets,  they made Sumter look like child’s play.  It is too early to tell, but maybe the Second Reconstruction is over and on the National level the Johnny Rebs are back in control.

As you can see, there is nothing new here, the war goes on, only the weapons change.  What began in 1066 in England is still being fought out today.  Will it end here?  Nobody knows.  The wheel of fortune is still spinning, the vagaries of history is still happening.  My only hope is that it will be the best thing for the country.  This I do know, it won’t be right if it comes from those Damn Yankees.

Warriors On An Invisible Front

Warriors On An Invisible Front

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Recently in Connecticut a fuehrer of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League complained about a garage sale that was selling Nazi and Confederate memorabilia.  While the vigilante official acknowledged that no law was being broken nevertheless in the crusader’s opinion the mere showing of these historical artefacts constitutes ‘hate.’ 

Well, it may be said as well that Jewish artefacts such as the Magen David is a hate emblem also.  While wearing or displaying the Magen David or waving an Israeli flag should be hate also.  Why shouldn’t anything that a particular group finds ‘hateful’ not be banned?  Let’s be fair and make a list.

In point of fact what Jews consider ‘the good war’, that is WWII, was the central historical fact of the twentieth century just as the Civil War was the central historical fact of the nineteenth century in the USA and CSA.  As artefacts from all combatants and this includes the Jews have a deep intrinsic interest to everyone why should the Jews be allowed to erase these significant memories from the history books.  I consider such an act evil or satanic.  I have a right to my history as the Jews have to theirs.   I am under no obligation to accept their interpretation of the past.  I can form my own.

Jews are not free from ‘hate.’  Even their reaction is evidence of hatred, their wars on Christmas and Easter are evidence of hatred.  Their current war on ‘Whiteness’ that they say there is no room for on Earth is genocidal hatred of the worst degree.

Yes, the Jews know how to hate and they know how to incite hatred.

We are warriors on an invisible front fighting with words and ideas.  Are our weapons inferior to those of the Jews.  We cannot tolerate Jewish visions of self-righteousness.  We should quietly tell them we will not tolerate their incivility or listen to their unjustified complaints and then turn our backs on them to show them their invisibility.

Ignore and isolate them as we go on our way.  Their opinions carry no weight with us.  We are tired of being reviled by the haters of haters.  Ignore them, put their opinions down.  Oh pshaw them.  They are not the conscience of our world.

A Note On The Slavery Sectional Conflict In The United States

A Note On The Slavery Sectional Conflict In The United States

A Passage From The Rise Of American Civilization

by

Charles Beard

Vol. II pp 4-6

Here’s a little food for thought on the slavery conflict leading to the Civil War.

“As the years passed, the planting leaders of Jefferson’s agricultural party insisted with mounting fervor that the opposition, first of the Whigs and then of the Republicans, was at bottom an association of interests formed for the purpose of plundering productive management and labor on the land. And with steadfast insistence they declared that in the insatiable greed of their political foes lay the source of the dissensions which were tearing the country asunder.

“There is not a pursuit in which man is engaged (agriculture excepted), exclaimed Reuben Davis of Mississippi in 1860, “which is not demanding legislative aid to enable it to enlarge its profits and all at the expense of he primary pursuit of man--agriculture…. Those interests, having a common purpose of plunder, have united and combined to use the government as the instrument of their operation and have thus virtually converted it into a consolidated empire.. Now this combined host of interests stands arrayed against he agricultural states; and this is the reason of the conflict which like an earthquake is shaking our political fabric to its foundations.” The furor over slavery is a mere subterfuge to cover other purposes. “relentless avarice stands firm with its iron heel upon the Constitution.” This creature, “incorporated avarice” has chained “the agricultural states to the northern rock.” and lives like a vulture upon their prosperity. It is the effort of Prometheus to burst his manacles that provokes the assault on slavery. “These states struggle like a giant,” continued Davis, “and alarm these incorporated interests, lest they may break the chain that binds them to usurpation; and therefore they are making this fierce onslaught upon he slave property of the southern states.”

The fact that free-soil advocates waged war only on slavery in the territories was to Jefferson Davis conclusive proof of an underlying conspiracy against agriculture. He professed more respect for the abolitionist than for the free-soiler. The former, he said, is dominated by an honest conviction that slavery is wrong everywhere and that all men ought to be free; the latter does not assail slavery in the states’’ he merely wishes to abolish it in the territories that are in due course to be admitted to the Union.

With challenging directiness, Davis turned upon his opponents in the Senate and charged them with using slavery as a blind to delude the unwary: “What do you propose, gentlemen of the Free-Soil party? Do you propose to better the condition of the slave? Not at all. What then do you propose? You say you are opposed to the expansion of slavery…. Is the slave to be benefited by it? Not at all. It is not humanity that influence you in the position which you now occupy before the country…. It is that you may have an opportunity of cheating us that you want to limit slave territory within circumscribed bounds. It is that you may have a majority in the Congress of the United States and convert the Government into an engine of northern aggrandizement. It is that your section may grow in power and prosperity upon treasures unjustly taken from the South, like the vampire bloated and gorged with the blood which it has secretly sucked from its victim…You desire to weaken the political power of the southern states; and why? Because you want, by an unjust system of legislation, to promote the industry of the New England states, at the expense of the people of the South and industry.”

Such in the mind of Jefferson Davis, fated to be president of the Confederacy, was the real purpose of the party which sought to prohibit slavery in the territories; that party did not declare slavery to be a moral disease calling for the severe remedy of the surgeon; it merely sought to keep bondage out of the new states as they came into the Union-- with one fundamental aim in view, namely, to gain political ascendance in the government of the United States and fasten upon the country an economic policy that meant the exploitation of the South for the benefit of northern capitalism.”

End of quote.

That must certainly have been part of it but it was only one element of the plan to punish Whites in the South.