A Review: Lion Feuchtwanger, Jud Suss-book, Jew
Suss-movie And The German Movies Jud Suss And The Rothschilds In The Context Of
The Times.
by
R.E. Prindle
This is a
review of the novel Jew Suss by Lion Feuchtwanger. The review will place Feuctwanger’s novel in
the context of the times it was written, that is the twenties and thirties of
the twentieth century with a view of the author’s intent.
While the
novel is of great importance to the period in question perhaps the name Lion
Feuchtwanger is unfamiliar to most. As
an historian, prior to reading Jud Suss I had seen the name mentioned
frequently but I knew nothing further of him.
Feuchtwanger while not logorrhaeic wrote a corpus. Most of it is
historical concerning the greatness of the Jews. He wrote a trilogy- 1500 pages- around the
character of Josephus and the Jewish-Roman war of the first and second
centuries AD.
Perhaps it
was the times and the Jewish propaganda machine that credits Feuchtwanger with
the mantle of the greatest historical novelist.
He isn’t close to that or even a contender, he makes laborious reading
at best. As his reputation has
disappeared that speaks for itself.
Nevertheless, Jud Suss was a best seller both in Germany and
abroad. My copy from the English reprint
publisher Hutchinson bills itself as of the 158th thousand. One wonders.
The book was
published in Germany in 1925. It tells
in a sort of fantasia of the career of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer who was the
court Jew to the Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg, the companion State of
Bavaria in the South of Germany. I am
sure that few people today know anything of Suss Oppenheimer if they have even
heard of him. He is little known outside
Germany while I have found no study of Suss in English.
Joseph Suss Oppenheimer
The book
revived an interest in Germany so that it was notorious from 1925 to the German
defeat in 1945.
Suss
Oppenheimer was the man who reorganized Jewry in the eighteenth century giving
them a sense of direction in the evolution of modern Europe. The contrast between the emerging Jew of Suss
and the traditional Jew as represented by a Rabbi Landauer is one of themes
Feuchtwanger develops. This theme
applies to the contemporary Germany of the period.
I don’t want
this essay to be too disjointed but as the past is ever present in the present,
for a proper understanding one has to meld the present with the past. Feuchtwanger is well versed in Jewish history
and lore. He knows and understands the
Jewish program. In Jewish thinking the
Jews are always distinct from and superior to the host people. Thus, the Jew Suss Oppenheimer although
essentially an employee of the Duke of Wurttemberg, Karl Alexander, he
considers himself equal to and indeed preeminent over his employer.
At the end
of the story when Suss has put the State into turmoil and the Duke lay dying
Suss whispers into his ear, we could have been friends but you felt yourself
preeminent when I was superior to you in every way. Together what we may have accomplished with
myself representing the aristocracy of money and you as the aristocrat of the
soil.
Here
Feuchtwanger gives away the Jewish conspiracy.
By commandeering the banking system they became not only equal to but
superior to the landed nobility. Who has
money controls destiny.
Suss was the
organizer of modern Jewry, he paved the way for the Rothschilds, ne Bauer, to
be the near absolute lords of money beginning only a few year after Suss’
hanging. Of course the Rothschild rise
was made possible by the theft of the fortune of the Landgrave of Hesse Cassel
during Napoleonic times.
As is common
knowledge Nathan Rothschild was sent to England to exploit the textile
manufacturing industry. According to the
current historian Niall Ferguson in his history of the Rothschilds using
Rothschild archives, Nathan had a struggle to stay solvent resorting to a
variety of devious practices including smuggling. Then the Landgrave entrusted either his
fortune or a large part of it to Mayer Rothschild the patriarch of the family
who sent substantial sums to Nathan making him a banker and richest stock
broker in the City. From there within a
very few years the Rothschilds became the lords of money gaining patents of
nobility wherever they lived thus realizing Suss’ dream. The Jews had become equal or superior to the
European nobility.
In the
interim between Suss’ and Feuchtwanger’s time the Jews had taken control of
European and American currency through the Central banks, the Federal Reserve
System in the United States. Thus, as I
interpret it in the sly conclusion of the Jew Suss Feuchtwanger is celebrating what in 1926 looked like the
triumph of the Jews over Germany and Euroamerica. Essentially the Stateless Jews were the State
from Russia across Europe to the United States. Money had displaced both European nobility
and statehood while Europe was in turmoil soon to be virtually destroyed by
warfare.
Once again
at the risk of confusing the issue it is necessary to go back in time
again. This time to 1666 in Europe. As always the Jews were welcome nowhere by
host countries. In eleventh century
Mesopotamia the Jews had been expelled.
The bulk of them migrated to Spain.
Then in the thirteenth century they were expelled from England, in the
fourteenth century from France and in the fifteenth from Spain. The Spanish migration had been to Africa, the
Turkish Empire in the Middle East and increasingly into the Eastern European
area that was to be called the Pale of Settlement. They had been banned from the Muscovite land
much earlier. The German States now
expelling them, letting them back in, banning again, etc.
In the
seventeenth century in the extended Polish empire in the Ukraine where they
made themselves pests the Ukrainians rebelled against the Poles and their
Jewish allies causing mass destructions.
The Jews fled in numbers into Germany and Holland carrying their
medieval vision of religion with them.
This was just prior to the career of Suss and the establishment of Court
Jews. Thus the German lands were in
turmoil as the Jews struggled to establish themselves.
Becoming
increasingly exasperated while blaming their woes on anti-Semitism rather than
their own actions a Messiah arose in the seventeenth century Turkic states by
the name of Sabbatai Zevi. As the Jewish
messiah is preeminently a military redeemer a great buzz of excitement was
aroused amongst worldwide Jewry. (The US
does not yet figure in world politics).
Especially in Europe where the Jews were struggling to find a place.
History
knows the Jews as violent brutal revolutionists, a people that nurses grievances
and never forgets them. Thus
remembering the Amalekites, in the second century the Jews of Alexandria and
Rhodes on a signal turned on their unsuspecting neighbors murdering about 250 K
in each location committing horrid atrocities.
This set off a bloody reprisal in which Rome terminated the Jewish
State.
Now in the
seventeenth century just as European events were setting the Jews in turmoil
Zevi’s messiahship was rising to a climax in 1666, that year was determined as
the year of the redemption. Thus as in
Rhodes and Alexandria the Jews prepared to turn on their European neighbors
murdering them wholesale, a genocide in hopes.
This is history and one suspects the history has survived into our times
as well as Germany and Europe of the twenties and thirties.
The signal
was to have been Zevi declaring the millennium in an audience with the Sultan
in Turkey. Instead of declaring himself
the Messiah Zevi converted to Moslemism.
The revolution fizzled much to the dismay of the Jews. Remember this occurred from say, 1660 to
1680. Suss enjoyed his heyday in the
four years from 1730-34 in the eighteenth century. That is a mere fifty years from Zevi’s
apostasy. There must have living people
who remembered those tumultuous times as Suss grew up. Although Feuchtwanger doesn’t mention it,
perhaps even his characters Isaac Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel.
Nor were
those intervening five decades years of repose for the Jews. The disappointment caused a movement toward a
whole reorganization of Judaism. On the
Western edge of the Pale the Jewish visionary the BaalShemTov created the
Hasidic sect that challenged Rabbinic Judaism while a disciple of Zevi, Jacob
Frank, created the freak sect of Frankists or Sabbatians whose belief system
taught that the Millennium would never come until the Jews had indulged all
their evil impulses thus clearing their psyches of nothing but good impulses
thus preparing them to receive their redemption.
At the same
time the Elders put their heads together to come up with a plan in which the
people themselves would be their own messiah renouncing individual
messiahs. So that the above was the
Jewish background in which Suss arose and flourished. Feuchtwanger was aware of it as there are
descriptive references to it.
So, now,
Feuchtwanger wrote his story in 1921-2 and published it in 1925. Things in the Jewish world had
progressed. As Feuchtwanger describes it
in his novel Suss, Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel have been working to get
together the Jewish network from the four corners of Europe. Suss represented the future of an open
display of Jewish financial power while Landauer represent the traditional sub
rosa power of money. Rabbi Gabriel was a
strange one. He was a Jew who migrated
to Holland where his prime identity lay but for his networking purposes he went
in disguise as Ahasuerus, the Wandering Jew.
He actively claimed to be several hundred years old and the actual Jew
who insulted Jesus. The disguise amused
the gentiles gaining their tolerance as he moved from place to place
organizing.
At Suss’
death in 1734 it was only about fifty years to the proclamation of Jewish
emancipation by the French Revolution.
It was in 1806 that Napoleon overran Hesse-Cassell that the Landgrave
made the Bauer/Rothschilds by entrusting his wealth to them. From then to the 1897 Jewish Zionist
convention in Vienna was only another ninety years. It was then but sixteen years to 1913.
According to
the American Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver the Elders had determined that the years
1913-28 were to be the years of the redemption as the Jewish Revolution at
which time the Jews would kill their European neighbors and unlike 115 and 1666
succeed. Six years after the Vienna
Zionist convention the first Russian Revolution was attempted but failed. Out of the convention and the first
Revolution came the document known as The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion that
outlined the Revolution that would succeed in Russia in 1917.
As a result
of the European War of 1914-18 Europe
was totally devastated and in turmoil.
The war that had engulfed Europe from Russian to England had destroyed
the flower of European manhood. The
aftermath in Central and Eastern Europe consumed even more. Once in power in Russia as Dostoyevsky
predicted the Jews began killing the Russians.
Of course historians speak of Russian activities against the Jews while
ignoring Jewish crimes.
When the
news of Jewish atrocities reached Western Europe they became alarmed. The Manchester Morning Post published a book,
The World’s Problem that sounded the alarm.
The Jews were prepared. It took
relatively small effort to discredit the Protocols while having their opponents
discredited as anti-Semites.
However,
even though the German Communist Revolution failed Jews had thoroughly
infiltrated the government while controlling German and international banking
and the press while obtaining a significant number of university posts. The Weimar Republic is remembered by Jews as
almost realizing the hopes of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer and it is that that Lion
Feuchtwanger is celebrating in his novel.
Feuchtwanger,
in the Jewish manner, took himself very very seriously. He believed he was a great, perhaps the
greatest novelist, while being at the same time a seer or prophet. In an interview of 1930 he asserted
positively that things were under control and there would be no revolution in
Germany. Of course, in 1933 he learned
differently. Just as the Wurttembergers
had turned on Suss so in 1933 the Germans turned on the Jewish people. In a way then, Feuchtwanger was a prophet.
In the novel
as well as in history Suss assumed the role of the dark, even black, eminence
of the Duke Karl Alexander. All his
counsels were evil while given on the basis of three for him and one for the
Duke. Like Colonel Parker and Elvis the
great lion’s share of the money earned by Elvis went into the Colonel’s pocket
and the remainder into Elvis’. So with
Suss. When Wurttembergers remonstrated
with him Suss haughtily informed them they couldn’t hang him higher than the
gallows. As it turned out they
could. They had a special seldom used
gallows thirty feet higher than the usual gallows. Plus Suss was shut into an iron cage in which
his body was exposed to the elements for years.
He had ably earned that level of hatred by his actions.
So
Feuchtwanger pointed the way to the anger of Germany in which having no other
recourse the Germans set about systematically exterminating them. A gallows high indeed. But, remember, the years 1913-28 were the
years of redemption. Just as the Jews in
the immediate years following 1918 slaughtered millions in Russia and Hungary
and would have in Germany had the revolution succeeded so the Germans were in
peril as a people and it had nothing to do with any holocaust. In 1940 a Jew from Newark, New Jersey, Theodore
Kaufmann published a book called Germany Must Die. In it he proposed to castrate all German
males, thus Germans would disappear within a generation. Genocide in another word. This notion of castration reappeared in
FDR’s talk as it became evident that the Germans would be defeated. The Jews then were no less guilty in intent
than the Germans.
Having no
territories or armies the Jewish offensive had to be asymmetrical, that is
psychological warfare. They had the
gifted Sigmund Freud to guide them.
Sigmund Freud’s role in guiding the destiny of the Jewish Revolution is
suppressed but as my studies advance he assumes a much more central role.
As part of
the asymmetrical warfare propaganda, of course, took first place. Psycho-analysis itself was controlled by the
Jews, almost a closed club although it had to represent itself as a universal
science. A science is universal so that
Judaism already active in all countries from the Soviet Union to the Americas
enjoying the advantage of the Trojan Horse of Communism also thrust themselves
into science as a Trojan Horse perverting scientific disciplines into subjective
Jewish propaganda.
Already in
control of the print media in the Pan-Judaic superstate of Europe and America
either by direct ownership or psychological control through the charge of
anti-Semitism it only remained to gain control of emerging technologies such as
movies and radio. This was easily
accomplished, the theater and movies certainly began as Jewish monopolies
which, at least in the US, all radio networks were in their control from the
beginning.
Thus by the
twenties the Jews were in a position to direct the social and intellectual
mores of society. One no longer hears mores
discussed as they once were even though mores control society even more than
laws. For instance there was no law
against criticizing Jews, one can’t be punished for criticizing Jews in Court
while Jews have established as a more that criticism of Jews is an unforgivable
social faux pas so that any individual will be ostracized by his own people,
blacklisted, deprived of employment having his entire future ruined. A penalty no Court could inflict. People have lost careers amounting to tens or
even hundreds of millions of dollars by the single accusation, that is
accusation, no proof or trial required, and with no recourse to law. Simple mechanics, street sweepers, had been
rendered unemployable for life.
Using this
immunity from criticism the Jews began an attack on the mores of the people of
Pan-Judea. They began defaming the
heroes of the various cultures defaming them into ridiculous caricatures. In the US the character of Thomas Jefferson,
for instance, has been demolished, Washington also. Having gotten the wedge in the whole of the
American past has been reduced to one huge crime for which living White people
are held wholly responsible and must be punished.
At the same
time the media elevated insignificant Jews to positions of not only importance
but extreme virtue. It matters not that
they were important out of all proportion in the slave trade or as slave
owners. They were Jews and all their
crimes could be justified.
Thus when
Feuchtwanger’s Jud Suss appeared in 1925 alert Germans immediately recognized
its import, its attack on Germans and German mores.
While I am
not familiar with the whole body of European Jewish writing it was also at this
time that Emil Ludwig began writing derogatory biographies of Bismarck and
Napoleon that drew the ire of European readers.
Feuchtwanger himself continued his sarcastic derogatory style in his
next novel of 1930, Success, that ridiculed and mocked the society of his
native Munich in much the same manner as Jud Suss. He displayed
a contempt for European mores much as his contemporary Sigmund Freud was
doing in his psychological treatises. In
films, the two Dr. Mabuse movies of Fritz Lang are worth noting. I am unfamiliar with US and French efforts
but in the US Gustavus Myers was turning out a long series of books denigrating
American mores and customs from finance to the Supreme Court finally ending his
career in 1942 with his History Of Bigotry In The United States.
So from the
Soviet Union West to the Americas the asymmetrical war on the West was being
very successfully waged. The back of
Western confidence and self-respect was broken.
In the great German book burning in which Jewish texts were destroyed
Feuchtwanger’s earned prominence.
The war accelerated
when the Nazis Party gained power in 1933.
Perhaps in support of that event Feuchtwanger began the movie script for
Jud Suss that was released in that year in England under the title Jew Suss and
in the US under the title Power. Closely
adhering to the book the movie was a vicious propaganda piece.
A number of
propaganda movies celebrating Judaism in the lead up to the attempted Jewish
seizure of power were such films as Erlich’s Magic Bullet, The Rothschilds, The
Story Of Emile Zola and several B level anti-Nazi movies of the late thirties
and early forties. The chief irritant to
the Nazis after Jud Suss was the US production of The Rothschilds. While nearly everything noted here is
currently available American The Rothschilds is not. The movie apparently covered the Napoleonic
period involving the Rothschild shipment of gold through France to aid
Wellington in the Peninsular War.
When the
Germans got around to answering these two propaganda films in the early forties
with their own propaganda versions they were demeaned as, naturally,
anti-Semitic. The directors of the
German Rothschild film covering the same events of the Jewish version was
vilified after the war and the vilification continues to today. The vilification of Veit Harlan, the director
of this brilliant film, is carried to extremes although perhaps a tribute to
his skill.
The
Napoleonic episode is apparently still sensitive to the Rothschild family since
the massive biography by Niall Ferguson only reaches to 1905 then pussy foots around
the incident. After pages of verbiage
Ferguson refuses to come to any definite conclusion and he was given access to
the family records and papers.
As these two
films are key to Jewish the war I will attempt to deal with them in extenso.
The Jewish
versions appeared first. The Jew Suss
was released simultaneously in England under that title and in the US titled
Power. The Rothschilds was released in
the US under that name in 1934; whether it was distributed in England I don’t
know but suspect so. It must be
remembered that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933 so that these two
films have to be seen as acts of war, part of an extensive ongoing
campaign. For instance in 1937 the
Dreyfus Affair in France of the 1890s was revived in the US film The Life Of
Emile Zola. Zola was a French novelist
who championed the cause of Dreyfus.
Alfred Dreyfus was a Jew serving as a French military officer. He was tried and found guilty of spying. He was certainly guilty although probably not
for spying for the Germans. Like
Johnathan Pollard in the US he was turning documents over to his fellow
Jews. He spent a number of years on
Devil’s Island until with the help of Zola his conviction was overturned. The affair was a serious issue that convulsed
France and apparently still does as Roman Polanski is scheduled to direct
another film sometime soon. Apparently
along with slavery we should all feel guilty of the indignity that Dreyfus
suffered even though he was guilty.
For the
Germans the two most galling films were Jud Suss and the Rothschilds. They answered the former in 1940 and the
latter in 1943. As films both are
superior to the Jewish versions although my opinion will be objected to as
anti-Semitic, but facts are facts. The
English-American Jew Suss was written by Feuchtwanger thus closely following
the outline of his book. The German film
presents the story from the perspective of the Germans who were afflicted with
Suss’ policies.
Both films
follow the general outlines of Suss’ actions and policies. There is no real conflict between the two
versions. In both, as well as in fact,
the Duke Karl Alexander gave Suss what seems to be in our terms a Power of
Attorney giving him the full authority of the Duke to do as he pleased. His will was the Duke’s will. Seems rather extraordinary that a ruler would
give such a thing but there you have it.
It is an inexplicable action of the Duke. One can even imagine it as his essential
abdication. Certainly the Power Of
Attorney gave him the right to depose the Duke.
In any case
the Money Power as represented by Suss
was placed in a superior position over the temporal power of the Duke.
After the
Duke’s death this presented a legal problem for the Wurttembergers because in
fact Suss was acting in the Duke’s name.
Thus Suss was absolved of all responsibility. Unlike Feuchtwanger’s two versions, book and
movie, in the German version the Wurttembergers were driven into open rebellion. In the German version there is no indication
that the Duke was murdered by Suss but the Duke had some strange degeneration
losing his will. He surrendered his own
will to Suss while the Duke’s wife and his advisors all seem to have been
accomplices of Suss. Perhaps he was a
master hypnotist or else how explain it.
At the end of the German version the Duke is a drunk who when confronted
by the rebels flies into a rage and has a stroke or heart attack. Goes apoplectic as they used to say.
With his
death Suss’ Power of Attorney loses its validity. He is arrested and tried. As stated, legally he was acting as the will
of the Duke having no personal responsibility.
It is interesting to note though that German soldiers under orders,
therefore having no will of their own, were held responsible by the Jews for
following orders in the camps. The law
is the law until it isn’t.
The German
problem then is that they are bound by the rule of law and cannot violate it so
as they ponder it appears that Suss must go free.
However
there is a law on the books making it illegal for a Jews to have intercourse
with a German girl. While in the book
and Feuchtwanger’s movie Suss had mingled with many German women including the
Duke’s wife in the German version he violates the daughter of the Privy
Counselor the girl then drowning herself.
The law is the law and the penalty is death. The Privy Counselor gets his due back (law is
not vengeance) by exacting the prescribed death penalty.
In
Feuchtwanger’s versions Suss’ daughter committed suicide to escape the
attentions of the Duke. Thus the Germans
neatly reverse the situation.
Now, the
German version released in 1940 was roundly condemned by the Jews as ragingly
anti-Semitic; this is strange as neither the Jewish or German versions contest
the facts of Suss’ activities. The Jews
happily admit Suss’ crimes.
Both movies
were released before there was a hint of a holocaust so one is at a loss to
explain the Jewish sensitivity, especially so as in the US in 1940 the book The
Germans Must Die by Theodore Kaufmann called for the genocide of Germans. The Germans were thoroughly outraged by the
book and its positive reception in the US causing Goebbels to exclaim that the
Germans would see who died first.
Perhaps the seeds of the holocaust were planted in German minds at that
time.
Jud Suss
then, was the reply to the English/American production of Jew Suss. That left the equally galling movie from the
German viewpoint of The Rothschilds to answer; this was done in 1943 when the
Germans replied in kind dealing with the transport of gold to Wellington in Spain
during the Peninsular War against Napoleon.
The event has been kept shrouded in mystery so the Jewish guilt must be
enormous.
As noted the
American film to which the Germans were responding is being kept off the market
as of 10/12/16 so the only conclusion is that even by Jewish standards the
incident is indefensible. We will have
to infer from the German film.
As there may
be readers who are not familiar with the historical account it may be
appropriate to give that briefly.
When Suss
had organized the Jews into a functioning unit, the ‘united’ Jews continued to
develop along with the emerging new money based economy of Europe. Excluded from the old land based wealth the
Jews were uniquely positioned to seize the money based economy.
As is shown
in the German Rothschild film the peasantry and even the nobility had little
familiarity with numbers and were easily bamboozled by fast talking Jews who
had been usurers for centuries. This is
demonstrated in both the Jewish and German versions.
The French Revolution
occurred forty-nine years after Suss’ death freeing the Jews from medieval
restrictions; this was called the emancipation.
The Europeans expected the Jews to abandon their parochial ways and
become one people with the Europeans.
As
Feuchtwanger said the Jews expected to become a sovereign entity as the Lords
of Cash.
There were hurdles
before them but they were swept aside when Napoleon in 1806 annexed the German
principality of Hesse-Cassell. The
Landgrave of Hesse-Cassell had amassed the largest fortune in Europe by renting
out his male subjects as soldiers to other States. In the book Suss’ advises Duke Karl to hire
soldiers to suppress the Duke’s subjects.
These most likely would have come from Hesse-Cassell.
The
Landgrave then used the receipts to loan money to the other States and people
amassing mortgages all over Europe.
Napoleon wanted the money; to avoid his getting it the Landgrave
enlisted the aid of his Court Jew, Mayer Rothschild ne Bauer who secreted the
fortune. Some believe the Landgrave
entrusted the whole of his fortune to Rothschild. Niall Ferguson in his history is ambiguous
waltzing around the issue.
In the
German movie the Landgrave entrusts Rothschild with 650K in negotiable
bills. Changing the issues from the
Landgrave to the English Jew Montifiore Mayer sent them to his son Nathan who
was stationed in England.
A few years
earlier Mayer had sent his ‘five arrows’ of legend to various capitals: Nathan
to England, James to Paris and the three others to Berlin, Vienna and Naples.
Nathan began
in the textile business in Manchester which apparently was too hard for him so
he resorted to the criminal means of smuggling and other subterfuges. The smuggling experience would stand him in
good stead. Nathan had also positioned
himself in the City. The London district
known as the City is equivalent to Wall Street in the US.
When
Napoleon invaded Spain the English countered by sending Wellington and an army
to Spain to counter the invasion.
Operating from England the provisioning of the army was difficult. To fund Wellington it was necessary to send
gold. The sea route was considered too
precarious so an overland route was deemed necessary. Overland meant passing through Napoleon’s
citadel of France.
England was
short of gold but a shipment arrived from India that was sold at auction. The English financiers were a sort of cartel
so they expected to obtain the gold.
However with the 650K in paper securities from his father (according to
the German film) Nathan was in a position to outbid the cartel which he did.
He then had
the only gold available to send to Wellington.
He agreed to do this for a handsome fee.
Napoleon who was retreating from Russia was defeated and sent to Elbe. From there he would soon return to France assemble
an army and meet Wellington at Waterloo.
This was a
second opportunity for the Rothschilds that far surpassed the gold purchase and
its transport to Spain. This stunt would
be worth in excess of ten million pounds making the Rothschilds the wealthiest
family in Europe while setting the stage for the nineteenth and twentieth
centuries.
The price of
government securities in England would depend on the results of Waterloo. A loss, stocks down, a win stocks up. A window of opportunity would exist between
the time of the outcome and the time the news reached England. No phones, no telegraph, no internet. Nathan Rothschild saw his chance to cheat the
people of England and he took it. He had
his agents at Waterloo to record the outcome, some say he used passenger pigeons,
some say not. In any event his agents got the news of Napoleon’s defeat to him
first. Nathan created a panic by
circulating the story that Wellington had been defeated. Then when prices were at their lowest,
apparently fire sale prices, he bought as much as he could. When the news of victory arrived it was too
late for the cartel. Nathan had become
the richest man in England.
Perhaps that
is why as of 11/5/16 the US version of the Rothschilds is unavailable. The facts coincide with the German version
too closely. In any event if the US
version is released you may be sure it will be heavily edited, quite unlike the
original.
Of course
the cry is that the German versions of both movies are anti-Semitic rather than
historical. At least in the case of the
Rothschilds the facts are incontrovertible.
The smuggling of the gold through France was actually known by the
French authorities at the time. The police
under the direction of Fouche were not fools.
Fouche himself is credited as being brilliant. Nor are German historians fools. They are more than competent. Before the two world wars German universities
were considered tops in the world.
German scholars stood out as the most brilliant stars in the
firmament. German music and literature
was unsurpassed.
Beginning
with the Weimar Republic and Jewish dominance standards slipped while German
hatred in the West led by the Jews libeled everything Germans did. The point being there is no reason to doubt
the scholarship on which the German Rothschild film is based. The Germans are speaking from intimate
knowledge of the Jews as indeed the controversy from Suss to 1950
indicates. You need only to read
Jewish-German literature to see the contempt with which Jews treat the
Germans. But if you control the
propaganda as the Jews do, black may be made white and vice versa.
Hitler in
his Mein Kampf clearly delineates the problem.
As he wrote, that if he and the Volkists failed their heads would roll
in the sand. This prediction was proven
in the years following the defeat. The
war did not end with the allied victory but continued to rage one sidedly over
the prostrate Germany for at least five years.
During 1943
the year the German Rothschild was released the extermination of the Jews was
reaching maximum efficiency. Now, we
must take the Jewish threat to exterminate the Germans through castration
seriously. Had FDR not died in ’45
before hostilities ceased it is quite possible he might have ordered such an
action. He was surrounded by Jewish
advisors who certainly would have encouraged him most notably his Secretary of
the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr., who had already usurped significant
Executive powers not unlike Suss himself from the Duke.
To put the
matter into perspective then, the German extermination of the Jews may be seen
as a preemptive strike. The Jews have
always favored preemptive strikes. So
while in 1943 the Germans had the upper hand a short time later the Jews would
gain the upper hand over a completely bombed over destroyed Germany flattened
by tens of thousands of bomb raids.
Fortunately
there were saner heads in Washington who were aghast at the lunacy of what was
now the Morgenthau plan, Kaufmann having been forgotten. Thus, when Truman replaced FDR Morgenthau found
he could no longer give orders to him as he could FDR. When Morgenthau haughtily told Truman the he
would do what Morgenthau said or Morgenthau would quit Truman merely held his
hand out to accept the resignation. At
that point a great deal of the Jewish influence prominent under FDR evaporated.
But the
Jewish influence had been cultivated since 1933 and was so embedded that its
actions persisted. As is not too well
known Bernard Baruch, an arch-Jewish villain in this period, had cultivated his
acquaintance with Eisenhower from the days of the Bonus March in 1934. Eisenhower revered Baruch saying he had sat
at his feet for twenty-six years while considering him the wisest man he knew. The influence was so incredibly effective
that Eisenhower initially ordered the extermination of the surrendered German
troops. During the winter of 1946 one of
the coldest on record he left entire German armies in the open with no cover
and the scantiest of rations. He ordered
that any German civilian who tried to pass food through the fence be shot dead.
The allies
also perpetrated enormous crimes against the German people. The French and Americans turned hordes of
African troops and American Negroes loose to rape German women at will, not
unlike Mama Merkel and the Moslems today.
The French took tens of thousands of German troops as slave labor and
worked them to death.
Perhaps you
say the Germans did the same but even if they did were we, the children of
light, that kind of people? Well, yes we
were although it was never reported in the papers. I grew up believing Americans were sainted
people who went into battle with a holy fervor bearing the banner of a
righteous Lord before us. I grew up
believing no American soldier would commit an act of injustice or cruelty. I was lied to.
The truth
has taken decades to reach me. I should
have known better because as great or greater crimes have been committed on
American soil by Americans. I was raised
to believe that Sherman’s March from Atlanta to the Sea was a great military
feat. The actions of General Sheridan in
the Shenandoah Valley or the evacuation of half a dozen counties around Kansas
City were never mentioned but all three were horrendous crimes. General Grant’s demand for an unconditional
surrender was just that, a turning over of American minds and bodies to do with
as the North liked; hence the horrors of Reconstruction. The Southern Whites were essentially reduced
to slavery. We are that kind of people.
Thus when
Roosevelt demanded unconditional surrender from the Germans it was his intent
to murder the entire nation if he chose;
we are that kind of people.
Despite
Obama’s assurances to the contrary he himself has declared opposition to his
rule to come from Domestic Terrorists, his acolyte, Hillary Clinton has
disparaged dissidents as a Basket of Deplorables, really having no right to
exist. Sorry, Barry, we are that kind of
people. Opposition to them is
irredeemably bad. The Jew, Noel
Ignatiev, and various Negro leaders have demanded the extermination of the
White race; therefore setting the staging in place for the extermination of
half of the White population. We are
that kind of people. We’ve done it
before.
The
slaughter of Germans by the allies and Soviets in the East, US, Brits and
French in the West was incredible, far exceeding any German war crimes. The post-war assault was led by the
Jews. While a small percentage of the
allied peoples, the so-called war crimes trials were staffed disproportionately
with Jews. Even though the Jews first
declared war against the Germans, and even though the Jews first called for the
extermination of the Germans backed by the full power of the Soviet Union and
the US, France and England, as in WWI the Germans were declared the aggressor
nation.
Even though
the Jews were murdering their so-called British allies throughout the Middle
East at the exact same time the war crimes trials were held, even though the
Jews in the US sent out teams of man-hunters to track down innocent men and
women they deemed anti-Semites in an extra-legal manner the Jews called
themselves the victims.
Even though
the Jews were punishing Germans they set their man-hunters to punish the US for
the ‘crime against humanity’ of not demanding a cessation of hostilities until
the entire Jewish population of Europe had been removed from the hostilities to
the safety of the US. Their
determination to exterminate Whites today is based on this perceived injustice.
As
unremitting as ever the Jews deeply resented the German version of the Jud Suss
movie. The key Germans were tried and
found guilty, some committed suicide, some were hanged outright, somewhat
reminiscently of Suss, while some were subjected to cruel and unusual
punishments. The children of the German
leaders were treated like animals deprived of all humanity, they were not
allowed education or the right to live their lives.
Over the
decades Jewish man-hunters tracked down totally insignificant German soldiers
to be imprisoned or killed by judicial murders.
The man-hunters violated all international law and the rights of
countries such as Argentina professing themselves to be a holy people above
human laws.
Veit Harlan,
the director of the superb film Jud Suss was deprived of work and hounded from
pillar to post. He had committed no
crime for which he could be tried or convicted.
The movie Jud Suss was a historical film based on real incidents, in its
general outline it differed in no substantial way from the Jews’ own
version. History is history and cannot
be denied. The Jewish version lauded
Suss as a great Jewish hero; the German version condemned him as a great criminal. There was no anti-Semitism so -called.
The Jews
merely consider it a crime to criticize them in any way. It is time for the dead past to bury its
dead. It is time for the Jews to leave
their so-called grievances behind. There
are no innocents. The Jews are their own
problem. They merit no special handling.
