The Sixties And The Negro Revolution
Part 3a
Terraplaning Through The Ozone
by
R.E. Prindle
Always keep
in mind 1954’s Supreme Court decision of Brown vs. The Board Of Education of
Topeka as the basis of our interpretation of the Negro revolution. There are other things to consider. In that era before the internet, indeed, even
as television networks were only developing, magazines were a key element in
forming public opinion. Liberalism, even
Communism, was the lens through which events were viewed. This was usually disguised as tongue in cheek
conservative criticism.
The most
important purveyors of this sort of public opinion were Time, Newsweek and
Life. The first and last formed the
Time-Life group of magazines all of which were very influential while disguising
their Liberal bias very well. Life was
the first to bite the dust probably being replaced by T-L’s People Magazine
that more or less covered the same ground in a more contemporary fashion. Far back but vying with these was the William
F. Buckley fronted National Review.
Buckley was the most pernicious of all posing as the consummate
Conservative while guarding the Liberal agenda from Conservative inroads.
These were
New York based magazines so that it is not surprising perhaps that they were
staffed mainly by Jews, including the National Review, hence Left Wing although
disguised as right wing or objective, and heavily pro-Israel, Negro and
definitely Jewish. It might seem odd
that all pushed a Jewish agenda but then as New York City was 25% Jewish let’s
just say they had a foot in the door.
Until
Time-Life was absorbed by the Jews in the TL-Warner Bros. merger the Luces,
Henry and Claire Booth who founded the empire ran a fairly useful
organization. I read Time religiously
and believed in the veracity of the magazine until I learned in their account
of Howard Hughes departure from Las Vegas that they fabricated the story
completely. Pure fiction and that this
was done routinely.
Nevertheless
as publishers of outstanding illustrated history books in extended series and
phonograph record collections of very high quality they did their best to
educate Americans of their past.
I finally
chucked Time Life in after buying their mail order library, The Time-Life
Reading Program. This was a series of
108 titles sent four volumes bi-monthly.
They became progressively Red oriented, that is propagandistic. I read the first eighty or so titles then
stopped although I have the full set of 108 less the replacement title of one
volume.
As they were
located in New York City they were enablers of the various revolutions giving
national prominence to what were local situations. Andy Warhol would have remained a relative
unknown except for Time while a relative nobody like Edie Sedgwick went
nationwide with Life’s picture essay of her.
Even Ed Sanders of the Fugs made the cover of Life as T-L constantly
hyped the Greenwich Village Bohemian culture, enabling that culture to conquer
America.
Newsweek was
a Time wannabe that didn’t have what it took.
One picked it up when Time wasn’t around which was rarely. Newsweek has gone defunct while pursuing a
far left Jewish agenda. The signs are
that Time sabotaged by the Jews through their merger will probably soon follow
under Jewish editorship.
As
commentary magazines there were Harpers, Atlantic, The Reporter and a host of
others but they were minor in distribution compared to the giants Time, Life
and Newsweek.
Time is of
the essence of the period.
2.
Movies and TV
Just as
one’s dreams form a parallel reality alongside one’s waking life so movies and
TV play a key role in the formation of one’s public life somewhere between
dreams and waking reality. Contrary to
claims made by the industry movies were not about entertainment but were purely
propaganda disguised as entertainment.
No serious history or study of movies exists to my knowledge although
specific movies are being injected into articles as alternate reality. While movies may not be actually real they
nevertheless create real memories and very influential memories that do affect
your actions. And memory is the basis of
consciousness. The memories are so
powerful that one may adjust one’s personality to reflect what is on the
screen. Thus when M.A.S.H. was on TV any
number of Hawkeyes stalked the land assuming that persona. The Hawkeyes then cast the people around them
in the various roles behaving as if those roles were real in fact. What a curse that was.
There was a
changing of the guard that occurred in 1962.
Within a few days of each other two movies were released the one being
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance and the other Ian Fleming’ Dr. No. The former was the swan song of the old
American mores while the latter established the new Freudian/Reichian pornographic image of the New America.
Liberty
Valance featured the two aging stars of the thirties and forties John Wayne and
Jimmy Stewart while being directed by the old warhorse, John Ford. Dr. No introduced Wayne’s successor Sean
Connery. It was like Zeus replacing
Cronus in the Age change from Taurus to Aries.
The two
female leads also heralded the change.
Vera Miles as the beautiful Hallie Stoddard Aryan model of Chivalry of
virgin sensibilities exited stage right while like Aphrodite of old the new
model woman Ursula Andress rose nearly nude from the sea as the pornographer’s
delight. Indeed, soon an area legal for
pornography would be created within a twenty mile radius of the Hollywood
studios ensuring that pornography would triumph in America’s theatres.
Thus
violence was personated in the form of James Bond (Sean Connery) and
pornography in various forms of Bond heroines who might all have been named
Pussy Galore were united. The future was
cast. Out with the chaste and demure
Vera Miles and in with the lusty, busty, big-assed Bond heroines chasing the
Big Dick. I knew something had happened
but I was left scratching my head.
Nineteen
sixty-two also produced the morally relativist masterpiece Mondo Cane. The movie had tremendous impact as it
demonstrated that nothing is good or bad but thinking makes it so. Sixty years later its images flash through my
mind
Thus the
Jews through Freudian/Reichian
psychoanalysis triumphed over and displaced Aryan European Chivalric
mores.
Now, Freud
and Reich were motivated by Freud’s total misunderstanding of the
Unconscious. Freud looked inside himself
and extrapolated his malaise as the normal for mankind irrespective of race or
religion. If Freud was the Jesus of
psychoanalysis then his disciple Wilhelm Reich was its St. Paul. While Freud was rejected by Aryans Reich was
able to translate sex and violence into something palatable for them.
While most
people know Freud, at least by name, many fewer have heard of Wilhelm
Reich. Reich was a disciple of
Freud. While Freud dressed his discovery
of the psycho-analytic method in a lot of mumbo-jumbo he essentially deified
his own subconscious desires for sex and violence and passed them off as
universal. He didn’t take those desires
to their logical conclusion however while Reich did. Reich’s vision was pure sado-masochistic sex
and violence and by sex I mean merely fucking.
While this
had been what Freud meant, when Reich held up his mirror for Freud to see Freud
was revolted by himself and cast Reich from his organization. At that time his group was all Jewish as it
was realized that psycho-analysis was a Jewish affair.
Reich
continued on and wed Communist violence to his psycho-sexual political
creation. Where he would have gone from
there having been discredited by the psycho-analysts isn’t clear but that
scourge who destroyed America without lifting a finger, Adolf Hitler, came to
power in Germany. The German States were
the center of the psycho-sexual scum.
As Hitler
was antagonistic to Jews in general, when he came to power in 1933 all this
intellectual treyfe with the exception of Freud, and he was to plague England,
fled to the United States settling in its two culture forming centers, New York
City and Los Angeles. Reich, the King of
Scurf, was one of these figures.
Hitler’s revenge on the United States.
He remained on the East Coast peddling his sex and violence.
If Freud had
rejected Reich US authorities followed suit in spades. They were so repelled by Reichian theories
that, this is truly remarkable, they not only arrested him as a criminal
lunatic throwing him into prison but actually collected his books and burned
them. This was in anything goes America
too.
The only
thing other than Reich that the US was intolerant of was Jewish comic books
that were also banned. The Jewish Horror
comics such as William Gaines Tales From The Crypt were sado-masochistic,
violent and pornographic while possible inspired by Reich’s approach to
psycho-analysis.
I was an
avid reader from eight to twelve of all the Gaines comics which I considered
outre and even as I read them thought to myself that they shouldn’t allow them
for little kids like myself. But, I read
them eagerly. Still I didn’t know that
what I was reading was sado-pornographic stuff.
Didn’t know either term at the time.
Apparently our parents did. These
were vivid, vivid stories. Great
pictures. Many of the images linger
on. Perhaps I was revolted because I
have always rejected pornography as a mental malaise. Not that that does me or anyone else any good
because every Hollywood movie has a pornographic base while many for general
distribution are worse than anything Gaines published. His line was named, humorously I hope, EC-
Educational Comics. Believe it or not.
At any rate
not all Reich’s books were burned as they were revived in the Sixties forming
the basis of Bohemian sex and politics notions.
So a new synthesis began to form, began to jell in the Sixties. The adoption of a new set of mores. It was realized that movies were an
unrivalled propagandistic tool.
Dusan
Makajevic, a Yugoslavian film maker made a perfect visualization of
Freudian/Reichian sexual politics in his movie of 1971: WR: Mysteries Of The Organism. The modern world in a nut shell, no pun
intended I don’t recommend it as without
proper education its sexual presentation will certainly be misunderstood as
pure pornography. Of course it is, but
only as a visualization of the Freudian/Reichian unconscious and its
consequences. E. Michael Jones gives an
extended literary version in his Libido Dominandi that I do recommend. Perhaps read it first.
So, now, we
have the perfect propagandistic tool that functions through both the conscious
and unconscious minds in hands of Jews indoctrinated in Freudian/Reichian
psychology. After WWII and the discovery
of Hitler’s death camps the Jews became absolutely hysterical. Even though American Jews had never been in
any danger, not even remotely, they now saw White Americans as potential if not
actual Fascists intent on destroying them.
This was serious.
William
Paley of CBS, himself a Jew, believed American death camps were so imminent
that he capitalized the careers of prominent Jewish performers- actors,
comedians and such- and sold shares in their future incomes to gentiles. By this ploy he believed that when the round
up came these few Jews would be spared for economic reasons. This is serious, indeed.
In any event
the path to survival in their mental state was to divide and
discombobulate. The Negro as a tool was
at hand. While the Judaeo-Communists of
the twenties and thirties had always used the Negro to sow discord and
confusion, in the post-war US their effort was stepped up. The movies were the perfect vehicle to divide
and control America. Hence we had all
those horrid Sidney Poitier movies shaming Whites and glorifying Negroes. By 1960 this was nearly in full spate. Miscegenation was a popular device so there
were numerous Negro male/White female pairings.
Remember the movies are a third reality somewhere between waking and
dreaming providing both conscious and unconscious very real memories from faked
reality. What was seen wasn’t true but
was accepted as such by suggestion. This
is serious business while presented as entertainment, it was actually behavior
changing propaganda. New mores for the
masses.
The
dialogue, then, was controlled and directed through films, the third reality.
And then
there was Brown vs the BOE. The greatest
divisive decision ever made and taken full advantage of by the Jews. Here was a way to protect themselves from a
nation, they thought, of Hitlers thirsting for Jewish blood. After the great preliminary battles of the
Fifties came the Sixties and the wedge that split the nation- the Civil Rights
Battle.
