WWII: The Greatest Crime Of The Ages.

WWII:  The Greatest Crime Of The Ages

by

R.E. Prindle

German Must Perish! and The War Goal of World Plutocracy by Theodore Kaufman and Wolfgang Dieverge,  reprint of the two 1941 editions by Ostara Publications, no date.

The history of the Second World War of 1939-45 is not as the orthodox version describes.  That history has been molded and shaped to conform with the desires of some interested parties.  In other words, it has been falsified.  The skewed history is more than merely one of interpretation.  Whole swaths of incidents have been suppressed, obscured or forced into a false narrative.  While your attention has been directed to a certain narrative, the real story lies exposed like geological strata.

I offer concrete undeniable facts to bring your attention to what was really going on.  The demonstration will focus on a book published in 1941 by one Theodore Nathan Kaufman.  Kaufman was an operative of the American Jewish Committee, the AJC.  For those not familiar with the AJC it is the directing governmental body of Jews in the United States.  It is essentially an espionage unit spying on the American people dedicated to rooting out what they are pleased to call ‘anti-Semites.’  They were also behind the effort to lead the United States into the war with Germany.  Their whole goal was to destroy Germany physically and to commit the genocide of 80 million Germans.

I know you are shocked and in total belief that 80 million people could be murdered but you shouldn’t be.  After all, the Chinese autocrat Mao Ze Dong murdered thirty million or more of his fellow Chinese and the world said nothing.  Not that much of stretch from 30 to 80 million.

Consider the facts: In 1933 the AJC executive, lawyer Samuel Untermyer declared irrevocable hatred of the Germans and war on the Germans.  Then began a whole series of boycotts and sanctions against Germany from the United States, a nominally neutral country by law.  This was done by its newly elected Democratic president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, FDR.  FDR as he is familiarly known was in the pocket of the Jewish governing body, the American Jewish Committee.

There were six key nations fighting this proposed war:  England, Russia, France, Germany, the United States and the Jewish Nation, the last spread out through Europe and the Americas.  The Jewish Nation was very carefully screened so that there would be minimal appearance of their maximum role.  They made themselves appear innocent victims while they stoked the fires of war.

We should be clear: there was no chance that Germany could win the war and this was against the combined might of the Soviet Union in the East and the United States to Germany’s West.  Zero chance and this was recognized by the warmakers at the time.

We now get to Theodore Kaufman.  Remember as he was writing his screed it was acknowledged that Germany could not win the war.  At the time Germany Must Perish, Kaufman’s book, was published England, France and the USSR were one block.  Germany Must Perish was published in March of 1941 before Germany had invaded the USSR and nine months before the US declared war on Germany.  So neither the US or USSR was at war with Germany of the time of publication.  Yet Kaufman was calling for the extermination of the Germany.  By whom then?

The agitation for US entry was conducted by England, Roosevelt and the American Jewish people.  England because it could not defend itself after being the first people to declare war on Germany in 1939.  England, because the country could not defend itself needed the US to fight the war for them.  England had neither the men nor the resources to even think of getting into the war on its own.

The Jewish Nation because the Jews wanted the whole German nation exterminated.  Kaufman explains:

Quote:

Today’s war is not a war against Hitler.  Nor is it a war against the Nazis.  It is a war of peoples against peoples….  This war is being waged by the German people.  It is they who are responsible.  It is they who must be made to pay for the war.

Unquote.

Remember that in 1933 the Jews declared war on Germany with no response from Germany.

So then, who is this Theodore Nathan Kaufman?

He was an AJC operative.  He is portrayed in the US as an insignificant shopkeeper from the Jewish colony of Newark, New Jersey.  A mere voice in the wilderness, perhaps a crazy Jewish prophet.  But, as a crazy Jewish prophet he publishes from the remote Newark Jewish colony a screed like Germany Must Perish calling for their total erasure from the Earth.  This book was not ignored, instead it was given maximum countrywide attention.  No such crank would have had access to the President of the United States but Kaufman did, no penniless shop keeper from Newark can launch a multi-million dollar campaign to publicize his book.  That just doesn’t happen.  He was a member of the AJC and the AJC was spending millions and millions on espionage, publishing books by the score while Jewish attorneys were filing lawsuits on every side.

Now, these deeds, these books, these acts have at the very least been disregarded or obscured, if it were possible to erase such a public campaign all evidence would have been scrubbed.  But, Kaufman and his book are inescapable evidence, not only fact, but concrete evidence of the activities of this Jewish Nation to draw the US and its resources into their, not the US’s, but their fight against the German people.  The war was between the Jewish Nation and the German Nation with the Jews as the aggressors.

The American People had no dog in this war but the Jewish People as Kaufman said, did.  What dog did Roosevelt have in the fight?  Why was he anxious to sacrifice the lives of tens of thousands of men in the prime of their lives?  Why was he so willing to strip America of its tremendous resources to badger a country that was no threat to the US?  Forget all that today Europe, tomorrow the world stuff.  Even if the Germans fancied it, had they conquered the whole of Europe including the Soviet Union, they would have been exhausted and unable to keep what they had.  That’s right, the Germans would never have been a threat to the US.

The Soviet Union unaided and without immense US supplies would have defeated Germany, it might have taken longer but as Stalin knew when he declared:  God is on the side of the big battalions.  Germany could not have won the war.  FDR certainly knew this.  Why was he subservient to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics? No contradiction there.  Because he was a socialist if not a Communist.  His old World War I master, Woodrow Wilson was a socialist.  FDR’s administration was a continuation of Wilson’s.  FDR even faked the League of Nation under the name of the United Nations through thus completing Wilson’s heritage.

Ah, I hear voices saying, you can’t genocide eighty million people.  The AJC and Kaufman thought you could.  It was simple.  You’ve heard of Eugenics haven’t you?  Of course you have.  Kaufman’s plan was simple.  You simply sterilize all Germans of child bearing age and children.  As Kaufman said, who was probably frightened by the word castration, sterilization doesn’t mean castration.  Sterilization for men is a simple operation, a little more complex for women.  I see no reason to examine the techniques of such a plan but if you have seen pictures of Germany bombed flat, Germans carving dwellings out the ruins,  ‘honorable allied soldiers’, American soldiers, turning German women into prostitutes with Hershey bars, you will realize how easy it would have been.  The plan only lacked will and it became within an ace of happening.  By Americans.

The Jews of course were ready.  The hitch came when Americans, less the Jews, were horrified at the notion.  The plan had the tentative backing of FDR and it was only his death on the eve of the end of the war that blocked the plan.

If we remember Kaufman’s book was published in 1941 before Germany had invaded the Soviet Union or the US had entered the war.  Kaufman’s was a pre-emptive plan.  Thus the representatives of the Jewish Nation had the system of genocide in place, Total War, before the Final Solution of the German Jewish problem was put into effect.

The Germans naturally were aware of Kaufman’s book shortly after publication, so it follows that the Final Solution was a variant of what Kaufman called the Total Solution of the Jewish Nation’s German problem.  Therefore, much of the Final Solution is mitigated by the Total Solution.

As to whether the whole Jewish People was responsible, Kaufman said that this was a war between peoples—the Jewish Nation versus the German Nation.  The Jews initiated its Total War, the desired end of which would be the total extermination, genocide, of the German People, that is a holocaust.  So, how can the German People be found guilty of attempting the genocide of the Jewish People except as an act of self-defense?  The slaughter was of course terrible, but so was the murderous war against Germany.  And that war was conducted with the full overwhelming power of the USSR and the USA against them.  Fleets of nightly bombers from the West and relentless artillery barrages from the East.  Germany had no chance of winning such a war; its doom was clear.

In March-April of 1941, then, the Germans learned of the Jewish menace.  They were horrified.  Copyright laws prevented the book from being published in Germany.  For whatever reason the law abiding Germans honored the copyright law.  The Germans were sticklers for the law and thus observed it refusing to print the book and alerting the German People of this threat from the Jewish People.  This side of story has never been told.

However, the Germans did print reviews of the book using extensive quotations which were ‘legal’ under copyright laws. A pamphlet was published by the German government titled The War Goal of World Plutocracy  by one Wolfgang Diewerge.

What Dieverge called the World Plutocracy meant the Jewish led coalition against Germany.  The title failed to indicate the urgency of the real issue, that of the declared war of the Jewish Nation against the German Nation.  Perhaps the Germans meant to implicate England, the US and Russia as well as the Jews which was a mistake.  Four nations were involved but only three countries.

There is more than one legal system with its laws and customs involved here.  On has the English and American variations of the Common Law, Soviet law, German law and Jewish law.  Today all countries are using a variant of Jewish law.  Under Jewish law the defendant is considered guilty and can only mitigate the charges.  Thus we have the situation in the US today of the Judeo-Liberal party that alleges that the accused is guilty, or he or she wouldn’t be accused would they?  Thus, the crime can only be resolved by accepting the guilt of being ‘wrong’ and accepting the judgment of the Party.  Bear in mind that in this so-called democracy the Jewish-Liberal party isn’t even the majority.  They are a minority that has appropriated the government regardless of who is president.  Thus, it is false to think we live in a democracy when we live in a Jewish flavored theocracy.

2.

Given that the Jews can manage the writing of history and the dissemination on knowledge and control discussion of the narrative it should come as no surprise that the German side of the story is suppressed.  The narrative is cast in the form of The Children Of Light vs. The Children Of Darkness.  All right then resides with the former and all fault with the latter.

As it is clear that the Jews first broached the notion of genocide when they were managing the overwhelming power of the US and USSR it follows that to avoid a German holocaust that the Germans were justified in a pre-emptive Jewish holocaust.  Both holocausts were to be managed in a scientific manner.  Thus, the Germans have no more cause for guilt than the Jews.

As might be supposed, since the plan for German genocide was trumpeted loudly throughout America, free copies were sent to influential people, Time-Magazine gave an approving review, newspapers nationwide disseminated the plan in an approving manner.  It should have been one of those things read with incredulity.

At the time the America First Committee was lobbying very actively, very actively, to prevent the US from entering another European war.  The American public was decidedly against any involvement in the war.  In March of ’41 a war with Japan seemed a remote possibility.  Roosevelt touted democracy and freedom yet he disregarded the vast majority and put US soldiers on the front lines both in the Pacific and the Atlantic.

And then we have a Jewish appeal for a German holocaust.  Without the US having yet no sinews of war, no will to war, what were the Jews thinking in making such a strange proclamation?  As Charles Lindbergh pointed out in his Des Moines speech, the Jews were finagling the US into a criminal war against Germany.  Forget any notion of a good war.

The Germans quickly obtained copies of the book or pamphlet that had been distributed to millions in the US with a copy sent free to every influential American.  The Germans were aghast.  Had the death of eighty million people ever been proclaimed before?  By a nation that refused to call itself that publicly?  Pretending to be Englishmen, Frenchmen, Russians, Americans, whatever.  The disguise was total and the danger was real.

The Jewish government presented Kaufman as an anonymous loner, something like Lee Harvey Oswald who may have fired at President Kennedy.  But was he? He was no fanatic rejected by World Jewry, no insane creature, but rather a leading and widely known Jewish figure in the United States.

The Germans published their answer to Kaufman in a pamphlet by Wolfgang Diewerge titled The War Goal of World Plutocracy.  He did a little research and came up with this:

Quote:

The Jewish president Kaufman is no anonymous loner, no fanatic rejected by World Jewry, no insane creature but rather a leader and widely-known Jewish figure in the United States.

Unquote:

Diewerge then says that Kaufman was a member of Roosevelt’s Brain Trust.  I’ve never read that before but then one can’t be sure that orthodox histories are ‘definitive.’  Diewerge goes on:

Quote:

He belongs to Roosevelt’s so-called “Brain Trust”, the staff of intellectuals and political advisors to the American President.  This circle provides the material for the hateful speeches against National Socialist Germany that President Roosevelt like to give…

The half-Jewish mayor (mother was Jewish) of New York, La Guardia, along with Roosevelt’s close confidante and friend, Bernard Baruch (“the unofficial president of the USA) also belongs to this group, which maintains closest ties to the leading men of the Soviet Union.

Unquote.

Baruch wasn’t so much a confidante and friend of FDR as a Grey Eminence giving direction to FDR.  As the war progressed and Kaufman’s proposal was tentatively accepted by Roosevelt, Kaufman’s plan was adapted by Secretary of the Treasury, the Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr. who did bill himself co-president with FDR.  Thus while Baruch was actually co-president with Woodrow Wilson during WWI, Morgenthau filled that role with Roosevelt.

Diewerge goes on:

Quote:

The book Germany Must Perish is the background music to the major policy deception that the leaders of the world plutocracy, President Roosevelt and his business partner in international warmongering, Winston Churchill, have launched to support their ally, Stalin.

Unquote.

That was an accurate description.  Stalin, by the way, was the brilliant mastermind pulling the strings of Churchill, Roosevelt and, actually, Hitler.  All three were duped by Stalin.

While Roosevelt preached Total War against the ‘aggressor nations’, unconditional surrender,  while the US was neutral after a fashion, Diewerge gives the German side of who the aggressors were:

Quote:

A digression is in order here.  Who declared war on 3 September 1939?  England and France used the local conflict over Dantzig and the Corridor, where justice was indisputedly on the side of Germany, to declare war on Germany and thus cause a world conflagration.

Unquote.

This was true.  Germany saw itself as rectifying the injuries it endured by the one-sided Treaty of Versailles.  It was also true as Diewerge was right when he next records:

Quote:

And the United States has been trying to “get into the business” for months with repeated provocations.  It prays daily for another “Lusitania” and regrets the case of the “Athenia” German attentiveness ruined their finely spun plans.

Unquote.

So, who were the aggressor nations?  First in order is the Jewish Nation with its proclaimed war of peoples.  Second was Stalin and the Third International, then Churchill and England and tied with Churchill was Roosevelt.  The Versailles Treaty that was designed by England and France in 1918 guaranteed another war in twenty years as was recognized at the time and as it happened.

Now, as to the Jewish desire to exterminate the Germans, consider how the war was fought:  there were actually two operations going on at the same time.  One was the war of land battles fought with armies and one was merely a series of bombing raids to destroy German cities, that is Germany, bomb it out of existence and bombing civilians to kill racial Germans.  In other words, aerial genocide.

During the war only the Anglo-American group had heavy bombers; the others had only tactical support bombers to support the ground troops.  The English developed the Landcaster with the capability of carrying twenty-thousand pound bombs along with incendiaries.  The Americans provided huge fleets of the smaller B-17s and then the bigger B-29s.  In a one of a kind situation that won’t be seen again the huge flotillas  of these behemoths dropping long strings of bombs, you’ve seen this in movies, with no other purpose than killing civilian Germans and destroying Germany.

The crowning achievement was Churchill’s decision to bomb the city of Dresden which at that time was packed with German people, women and children, displaced by the war.  Purely murderous.  There was no war industry there and not a single anti-aircraft gun.  Flotillas of bombers flying over low unloading everything from ten ton blockbusters to scads of incendiaries creating a fire storm.  This was purely a raid against unarmed civilians.  A holocaust pure and simple.  And if one horror wasn’t enough, they came back the next day to bomb the ruins.

As will be remembered, Kaufman and the AJC said that this was a war against a people- the Jews vs. the Germans.  Certainly the terrific bombing campaigns leveling German cities and killing millions was no less a crime than the Germans killing their avowed Jewish enemies in extermination camps like Auschwitz.  One might say tit for tat.  Also remember that the English was the aggressor, declaring war first.  Also, the bombing began long before the death camps were put into operation so one cannot say that the camps were not retaliatory.

Dresden was not like the end of horrors for the Germans but merely the beginning.  While the English and Americas were bombing the hell out of the civilians, the Eastern front against the Germans had been collapsing in an orderly fashion but tens of thousands of German troops had been captured and were never seen alive again.  They died in the Gulags where the camp commandants were with one exception were Jewish.

Once again, the fate of the German immigrants in Russia had little or nothing to do with the war.  Prior to the unification of the Germans under Bismarck, the Russian Czars had invited German colonists to settle in the Ukraine and the Volga Delta.  Always orderly and industrious the Germans prospered farming the Ukraine making that underpopulated desert bloom.  The contrast between the Jewish, the Russian and the German farmers was sharp and distinct.  Germans quickly moved to prominence in the government.

Then, when Germany consolidated all the petty principalities that the West found amusing,  into a unified State, and began functioning on modern Western methods they became a threat being more capable than the English and French, while the Czars began to view their German citizens although thoroughly Russified as a potential Fifth Column and persecuted them.  Thus German hatred began to grow.  Disabilities were placed on the Ukrainian and Volga Germans.  They were discriminated against.  When the Soviets replaced the Russians and Stalin replaced Lenin, the former minister of minorities collected the Volga Germans en masse and sent them to Siberia for extermination.  Thus, combined against the Germans in WWII were the Soviets in the East and Americans in the West and the Jewish Nation distributed throughout in influential, directing positions.  If you think the Germans could not see what was going on you should question your analytical abilities.  Actually, Germany was fighting for survival.

As the Soviet armies breached the German border, the ever clever Stalin who had thought this moment out thoroughly drove the civilian German population before him.  This horrific rout is described as a population transfer by orthodox historians.  One must question their analytical abilities.  The East Germans then murdered and raped by the advance troops were driven pell mell westward in the depths of winter.

The entire East German population of twelve to fifteen million people were displaced in a moment, driven West.  Such intense and concentrated suffering had never been seen in the world and this includes the child’s play of Auschwitz.

The Soviet armies consisted of primitives who had never seen a wrist watch before and were entranced.  They had never tasted real wine.  They had never had their way with beautiful White women.  Now they tortured and raped to their hearts’ content.  Women were gang raped like the flotillas that bombed Dresden.  You have to be heartless not to understand and sympathize.  Auschwitz?  Phooey!

In the dead of winter, ill clad and ill fed, at risk every moment these millions upon millions of wretched people fled just in advance of the total destruction of their destination.  They arrived in Berlin just in time for the most fearful artillery bombardment ever. The Soviets made up for their lack of bombers with terrific and devastating artillery bombardments.  Now remember, the Soviets had only been enabled with these abilities because Roosevelt stripped America of its resources and was supplying Russia with the sinews of war.  Thus the Americans. In effect, were giving it to the Germans both East and West, materially.

Berlin was completely destroyed blown into bits of rubble.  That anyone survived this terrible onslaught both from the air and from the land is a miracle

Now, I was brought up to believe that American soldiers where saints who though brave were never brutal.  And I believed what I had been told.  I didn’t question the propaganda.  And then, my elders made a mistake- they taught me how to read.  And I resent how terribly I was misled.

The Americans were hardly less brutal than the Soviets under the direction of Dwight David Eisenhower.

Kaufman said that the war had nothing to do with Hitler but that it was a war between the Jewish and German peoples.  As such the shooting war ended in 1945; the war of the Jewish people on the German people didn’t.

The Americans and Soviets drove the Germans down but now the Jewish people wanted to finish the job, enforce their plan.  As the Anglo-American and Soviet troops entered Germany for the Jews then, don’t forget Dresden, the horrible truth of the extermination camps was revealed.  The Jews were appalled and now in power over the Germans could get on with exterminating them.  But there was a hitch, Roosevelt died.

In the US the Kaufman Plan had morphed into the Morgenthau Plan of the Secretary of State, Henry Morgenthau Jr.  Roosevelt would have carried out the plan except that he passed in April of ’45 a month before the shooting war ended.  His replacement, Vice President Harry S. Truman was completely ignorant of the plans of the FDR cabal.  Truman entered office with no knowledge of the State of the Union.  Even though FDR was sitting with his feet dangling in the grave he didn’t think it expedient to inform his obvious successor of the state of affairs.  Did he think that his cabal was so evil that Truman would be repulsed?  Let me put it this way, Truman was repulsed when he learned what was going on.  Among other things on his mind was his discovery of the Manhattan Project and its Atom Bomb.  Blindsided by Rooseveltian politics.

However Truman was not so sympathetic to Jewish machinations as FDR had been.  Thus their power was broken.  As members of what might be called FDR’s shadow government they faded away.  Samuel Rosenman, perhaps the closest to FDR no longer had any place in DC.  Sidney Hillman was gone.  Henry Morgenthau himself tendered his resignation unable to work with Truman.  Truman gladly accepted it.  The tyranny of FDR fairly quickly evaporated.  A weight was lifted from the American people.  Don’t think there wasn’t rejoicing either.

While Truman was being quickly briefed on the actual state of affairs, the mopping up operations in German continued more or less according to the Kaufman/Morgenthau Plan.  The Supreme Commander in Europe was Dwight D. Eisenhower.  His advisor and confidant was Bernard Baruch, a man who wanted to be the greatest Jew of all time, and who was, indeed, a very large ranking member of the Jewish World Government. 

As mentioned, he had actually been co-president with Woodrow Wilson during what could now be called WWI.  He had meddled with Republican politics during the interim of 1921-33 and came into power again with the Roosevelt Administration in 1933.  Diewerge described him as co-president with FDR which is not exactly true but may have seemed so to outside observers.  The relationship was more adversarial, but face to face Baruch was able to intimidate FDR.

 Dwight Eisenhower had been disciple of Baruch’s for twenty-five years.  Eisenhower considered him the wisest man alive.  There was a tremendous furor at the time as to how to treat the Germans.  The Jewish faction wanted to dismember the German State completely parceling out the German territories to the surrounding countries.  The dividing of Germany into Allied administrative units perpetually occupied was decided upon.  The German people were to be kept impoverished and starved to death with no relief.

Eisenhower had under his control several German armies.  Although the shooting war was over and there was absolutely no chance of Germany conducting any resistance these men were not released nor, were they treated humanely according the Geneva conventions.  Eisenhower mean to destroy as many as he could.  Remember that Bernard Baruch had direct connections to him and wanted to further the murder of the Germans.  Hence Eisenhower unilaterally declassified them as soldiers and reclassified them as enemy combatants who were not covered by the Geneva Conventions.  The men were crowded together in open fields with no covering and no amenities, ill clothed and ill fed.  Civilians were forbidden on pain of death for comforting them in anyway.  Women trying to pass food through the barbed wire were shot down without compunction.

Nor did this criminal conduct end quickly but was continued until 1950 when the Americans, England and France realized that they needed a buffer state between themselves and the Soviet Union.  And so, the war in the West came to its grudging end.  The Soviets were much more brutal, so much so that there was a continuing drain from the East German Sector of the USSR as Germans fled to the West necessitating the building of the Berlin wall.

As may easily be seen the orthodox version, the academic version, of the period is so distorted as to be a fantasy of the reality.  The root of the war as per Kaufman’s plan was the Jewish Nation’s hatred of the German Nation.  That hatred went back many centuries and was fully developed.  Having essentially captured the US, England and USSR governments the Jewish Nation was able to direct their energies toward a Total Solution of their German Problem which was the total genocide of the German people.  WWII was the greatest crime ever perpetrated.

All this has been obscured and ignored and hidden if not nearly erased.  The world is so conditioned to view the period from the Jewish point of view that they find the truth incomprehensible.  To expose that truth is to expose one’s self to many hazards.  Many such people now have permanent homes in prisons.  Laws in nearly all countries have been passed to make even the objective discussion of the period a criminal offence, France and Germany being the worst offenders with England close behind.  They must protect their narrative at all costs.

And so, nearly a hundred years after the war goes on unabated.  Circumstances have changed but the situation hasn’t.

A Review: Lion Feuchtwanger, Jud Suss, Book And Movie

 

A Review:  Lion Feuchtwanger, Jud Suss-book, Jew Suss-movie And The German Movies Jud Suss And The Rothschilds In The Context Of The Times.

by

R.E. Prindle

Lion Feuchtwanger 

This is a review of the novel Jew Suss by Lion Feuchtwanger.  The review will place Feuctwanger’s novel in the context of the times it was written, that is the twenties and thirties of the twentieth century with a view of the author’s intent.

 

 

While the novel is of great importance to the period in question perhaps the name Lion Feuchtwanger is unfamiliar to most.   As an historian, prior to reading Jud Suss I had seen the name mentioned frequently but I knew nothing further of him.  Feuchtwanger while not logorrhaeic wrote a corpus. Most of it is historical concerning the greatness of the Jews.  He wrote a trilogy- 1500 pages- around the character of Josephus and the Jewish-Roman war of the first and second centuries AD.

Perhaps it was the times and the Jewish propaganda machine that credits Feuchtwanger with the mantle of the greatest historical novelist.  He isn’t close to that or even a contender, he makes laborious reading at best.  As his reputation has disappeared that speaks for itself.  Nevertheless, Jud Suss was a best seller both in Germany and abroad.  My copy from the English reprint publisher Hutchinson bills itself as of the 158^th thousand.  One wonders.

The book was published in Germany in 1925.  It tells in a sort of fantasia of the career of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer who was the court Jew to the Duke Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg, the companion State of Bavaria in the South of Germany.  I am sure that few people today know anything of Suss Oppenheimer if they have even heard of him.  He is little known outside Germany while I have found no study of Suss in English.

 

Joseph Suss Oppenheimer

The book revived an interest in Germany so that it was notorious from 1925 to the German defeat in 1945.

Suss Oppenheimer was the man who reorganized Jewry in the eighteenth century giving them a sense of direction in the evolution of modern Europe.  The contrast between the emerging Jew of Suss and the traditional Jew as represented by a Rabbi Landauer is one of themes Feuchtwanger develops.    This theme applies to the contemporary Germany of the period.

I don’t want this essay to be too disjointed but as the past is ever present in the present, for a proper understanding one has to meld the present with the past.  Feuchtwanger is well versed in Jewish history and lore.  He knows and understands the Jewish program.  In Jewish thinking the Jews are always distinct from and superior to the host people.  Thus, the Jew Suss Oppenheimer although essentially an employee of the Duke of Wurttemberg, Karl Alexander, he considers himself equal to and indeed preeminent over his employer.

At the end of the story when Suss has put the State into turmoil and the Duke lay dying Suss whispers into his ear, we could have been friends but you felt yourself preeminent when I was superior to you in every way.  Together what we may have accomplished with myself representing the aristocracy of money and you as the aristocrat of the soil.

Here Feuchtwanger gives away the Jewish conspiracy.  By commandeering the banking system they became not only equal to but superior to the landed nobility.  Who has money controls destiny.

Suss was the organizer of modern Jewry, he paved the way for the Rothschilds, ne Bauer, to be the near absolute lords of money beginning only a few year after Suss’ hanging.  Of course the Rothschild rise was made possible by the theft of the fortune of the Landgrave of Hesse Cassel during Napoleonic times.

As is common knowledge Nathan Rothschild was sent to England to exploit the textile manufacturing industry.  According to the current historian Niall Ferguson in his history of the Rothschilds using Rothschild archives, Nathan had a struggle to stay solvent resorting to a variety of devious practices including smuggling.  Then the Landgrave entrusted either his fortune or a large part of it to Mayer Rothschild the patriarch of the family who sent substantial sums to Nathan making him a banker and richest stock broker in the City.  From there within a very few years the Rothschilds became the lords of money gaining patents of nobility wherever they lived thus realizing Suss’ dream.  The Jews had become equal or superior to the European nobility.

In the interim between Suss’ and Feuchtwanger’s time the Jews had taken control of European and American currency through the Central banks, the Federal Reserve System in the United States.  Thus, as I interpret it in the sly conclusion of the Jew Suss Feuchtwanger  is celebrating what in 1926 looked like the triumph of the Jews over Germany and Euroamerica.  Essentially the Stateless Jews were the State from Russia across Europe to the United States.   Money had displaced both European nobility and statehood while Europe was in turmoil soon to be virtually destroyed by warfare.

Once again at the risk of confusing the issue it is necessary to go back in time again.  This time to 1666 in Europe.  As always the Jews were welcome nowhere by host countries.  In eleventh century Mesopotamia the Jews had been expelled.  The bulk of them migrated to Spain.  Then in the thirteenth century they were expelled from England, in the fourteenth century from France and in the fifteenth from Spain.  The Spanish migration had been to Africa, the Turkish Empire in the Middle East and increasingly into the Eastern European area that was to be called the Pale of Settlement.  They had been banned from the Muscovite land much earlier.  The German States now expelling them, letting them back in, banning again, etc.

In the seventeenth century in the extended Polish empire in the Ukraine where they made themselves pests the Ukrainians rebelled against the Poles and their Jewish allies causing mass destructions.  The Jews fled in numbers into Germany and Holland carrying their medieval vision of religion with them.  This was just prior to the career of Suss and the establishment of Court Jews.  Thus the German lands were in turmoil as the Jews struggled to establish themselves.

Becoming increasingly exasperated while blaming their woes on anti-Semitism rather than their own actions a Messiah arose in the seventeenth century Turkic states by the name of Sabbatai Zevi.  As the Jewish messiah is preeminently a military redeemer a great buzz of excitement was aroused amongst worldwide Jewry.  (The US does not yet figure in world politics).  Especially in Europe where the Jews were struggling to find a place.

History knows the Jews as violent brutal revolutionists, a people that nurses grievances and never forgets them.   Thus remembering the Amalekites, in the second century the Jews of Alexandria and Rhodes on a signal turned on their unsuspecting neighbors murdering about 250 K in each location committing horrid atrocities.  This set off a bloody reprisal in which Rome terminated the Jewish State.

Now in the seventeenth century just as European events were setting the Jews in turmoil Zevi’s messiahship was rising to a climax in 1666, that year was determined as the year of the redemption.  Thus as in Rhodes and Alexandria the Jews prepared to turn on their European neighbors murdering them wholesale, a genocide in hopes.  This is history and one suspects the history has survived into our times as well as Germany and Europe of the twenties and thirties.

The signal was to have been Zevi declaring the millennium in an audience with the Sultan in Turkey.  Instead of declaring himself the Messiah Zevi converted to Moslemism.  The revolution fizzled much to the dismay of the Jews.  Remember this occurred from say, 1660 to 1680.  Suss enjoyed his heyday in the four years from 1730-34 in the eighteenth century.  That is a mere fifty years from Zevi’s apostasy.  There must have living people who remembered those tumultuous times as Suss grew up.  Although Feuchtwanger doesn’t mention it, perhaps even his characters Isaac Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel.

Nor were those intervening five decades years of repose for the Jews.  The disappointment caused a movement toward a whole reorganization of Judaism.  On the Western edge of the Pale the Jewish visionary the BaalShemTov created the Hasidic sect that challenged Rabbinic Judaism while a disciple of Zevi, Jacob Frank, created the freak sect of Frankists or Sabbatians whose belief system taught that the Millennium would never come until the Jews had indulged all their evil impulses thus clearing their psyches of nothing but good impulses thus preparing them to receive their redemption.

At the same time the Elders put their heads together to come up with a plan in which the people themselves would be their own messiah renouncing individual messiahs.  So that the above was the Jewish background in which Suss arose and flourished.  Feuchtwanger was aware of it as there are descriptive references to it.

So, now, Feuchtwanger wrote his story in 1921-2 and published it in 1925.  Things in the Jewish world had progressed.  As Feuchtwanger describes it in his novel Suss, Landauer and the Rabbi Gabriel have been working to get together the Jewish network from the four corners of Europe.  Suss represented the future of an open display of Jewish financial power while Landauer represent the traditional sub rosa power of money.  Rabbi Gabriel was a strange one.  He was a Jew who migrated to Holland where his prime identity lay but for his networking purposes he went in disguise as Ahasuerus, the Wandering Jew.  He actively claimed to be several hundred years old and the actual Jew who insulted Jesus.  The disguise amused the gentiles gaining their tolerance as he moved from place to place organizing. 

At Suss’ death in 1734 it was only about fifty years to the proclamation of Jewish emancipation by the French Revolution.  It was in 1806 that Napoleon overran Hesse-Cassell that the Landgrave made the Bauer/Rothschilds by entrusting his wealth to them.  From then to the 1897 Jewish Zionist convention in Vienna was only another ninety years.  It was then but sixteen years to 1913.

According to the American Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver the Elders had determined that the years 1913-28 were to be the years of the redemption as the Jewish Revolution at which time the Jews would kill their European neighbors and unlike 115 and 1666 succeed.  Six years after the Vienna Zionist convention the first Russian Revolution was attempted but failed.  Out of the convention and the first Revolution came the document known as The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion that outlined the Revolution that would succeed in Russia in 1917.

As a result of the European War of 1914-18  Europe was totally devastated and in turmoil.  The war that had engulfed Europe from Russian to England had destroyed the flower of European manhood.  The aftermath in Central and Eastern Europe consumed even more.  Once in power in Russia as Dostoyevsky predicted the Jews began killing the Russians.  Of course historians speak of Russian activities against the Jews while ignoring Jewish crimes.

When the news of Jewish atrocities reached Western Europe they became alarmed.  The Manchester Morning Post published a book, The World’s Problem that sounded the alarm.  The Jews were prepared.  It took relatively small effort to discredit the Protocols while having their opponents discredited as anti-Semites.

However, even though the German Communist Revolution failed Jews had thoroughly infiltrated the government while controlling German and international banking and the press while obtaining a significant number of university posts.  The Weimar Republic is remembered by Jews as almost realizing the hopes of Joseph Suss Oppenheimer and it is that that Lion Feuchtwanger is celebrating in his novel.

Feuchtwanger, in the Jewish manner, took himself very very seriously.  He believed he was a great, perhaps the greatest novelist, while being at the same time a seer or prophet.  In an interview of 1930 he asserted positively that things were under control and there would be no revolution in Germany.  Of course, in 1933 he learned differently.   Just as the Wurttembergers had turned on Suss so in 1933 the Germans turned on the Jewish people.  In a way then, Feuchtwanger was a prophet.

In the novel as well as in history Suss assumed the role of the dark, even black, eminence of the Duke Karl Alexander.  All his counsels were evil while given on the basis of three for him and one for the Duke.  Like Colonel Parker and Elvis the great lion’s share of the money earned by Elvis went into the Colonel’s pocket and the remainder into Elvis’.  So with Suss.  When Wurttembergers remonstrated with him Suss haughtily informed them they couldn’t hang him higher than the gallows.  As it turned out they could.  They had a special seldom used gallows thirty feet higher than the usual gallows.  Plus Suss was shut into an iron cage in which his body was exposed to the elements for years.  He had ably earned that level of hatred by his actions.

So Feuchtwanger pointed the way to the anger of Germany in which having no other recourse the Germans set about systematically exterminating them.  A gallows high indeed.  But, remember, the years 1913-28 were the years of redemption.  Just as the Jews in the immediate years following 1918 slaughtered millions in Russia and Hungary and would have in Germany had the revolution succeeded so the Germans were in peril as a people and it had nothing to do with any holocaust.  In 1940 a Jew from Newark, New Jersey, Theodore Kaufmann published a book called Germany Must Die.  In it he proposed to castrate all German males, thus Germans would disappear within a generation.  Genocide in another word.   This notion of castration reappeared in FDR’s talk as it became evident that the Germans would be defeated.  The Jews then were no less guilty in intent than the Germans.

Having no territories or armies the Jewish offensive had to be asymmetrical, that is psychological warfare.  They had the gifted Sigmund Freud to guide them.  Sigmund Freud’s role in guiding the destiny of the Jewish Revolution is suppressed but as my studies advance he assumes a much more central role.

As part of the asymmetrical warfare propaganda, of course, took first place.  Psycho-analysis itself was controlled by the Jews, almost a closed club although it had to represent itself as a universal science.  A science is universal so that Judaism already active in all countries from the Soviet Union to the Americas enjoying the advantage of the Trojan Horse of Communism also thrust themselves into science as a Trojan Horse perverting scientific disciplines into subjective Jewish propaganda.

Already in control of the print media in the Pan-Judaic superstate of Europe and America either by direct ownership or psychological control through the charge of anti-Semitism it only remained to gain control of emerging technologies such as movies and radio.  This was easily accomplished, the theater and movies certainly began as Jewish monopolies which, at least in the US, all radio networks were in their control from the beginning.

Thus by the twenties the Jews were in a position to direct the social and intellectual mores of society.  One no longer hears mores discussed as they once were even though mores control society even more than laws.  For instance there was no law against criticizing Jews, one can’t be punished for criticizing Jews in Court while Jews have established as a more that criticism of Jews is an unforgivable social faux pas so that any individual will be ostracized by his own people, blacklisted, deprived of employment having his entire future ruined.  A penalty no Court could inflict.  People have lost careers amounting to tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars by the single accusation, that is accusation, no proof or trial required, and with no recourse to law.   Simple mechanics, street sweepers, had been rendered unemployable for life.

Using this immunity from criticism the Jews began an attack on the mores of the people of Pan-Judea.  They began defaming the heroes of the various cultures defaming them into ridiculous caricatures.  In the US the character of Thomas Jefferson, for instance, has been demolished, Washington also.  Having gotten the wedge in the whole of the American past has been reduced to one huge crime for which living White people are held wholly responsible and must be punished.

At the same time the media elevated insignificant Jews to positions of not only importance but extreme virtue.  It matters not that they were important out of all proportion in the slave trade or as slave owners.  They were Jews and all their crimes could be justified.

Thus when Feuchtwanger’s Jud Suss appeared in 1925 alert Germans immediately recognized its import, its attack on Germans and German mores.

While I am not familiar with the whole body of European Jewish writing it was also at this time that Emil Ludwig began writing derogatory biographies of Bismarck and Napoleon that drew the ire of European readers.  Feuchtwanger himself continued his sarcastic derogatory style in his next novel of 1930, Success, that ridiculed and mocked the society of his native Munich in much the same manner as Jud Suss.  He displayed  a contempt for European mores much as his contemporary Sigmund Freud was doing in his psychological treatises.  In films, the two Dr. Mabuse movies of Fritz Lang are worth noting.  I am unfamiliar with US and French efforts but in the US Gustavus Myers was turning out a long series of books denigrating American mores and customs from finance to the Supreme Court finally ending his career in 1942 with his History Of Bigotry In The United States.

So from the Soviet Union West to the Americas the asymmetrical war on the West was being very successfully waged.  The back of Western confidence and self-respect was broken.  In the great German book burning in which Jewish texts were destroyed Feuchtwanger’s earned prominence.

The war accelerated when the Nazis Party gained power in 1933.  Perhaps in support of that event Feuchtwanger began the movie script for Jud Suss that was released in that year in England under the title Jew Suss and in the US under the title Power.  Closely adhering to the book the movie was a vicious propaganda piece.

A number of propaganda movies celebrating Judaism in the lead up to the attempted Jewish seizure of power were such films as Erlich’s Magic Bullet, The Rothschilds, The Story Of Emile Zola and several B level anti-Nazi movies of the late thirties and early forties.  The chief irritant to the Nazis after Jud Suss was the US production of The Rothschilds.  While nearly everything noted here is currently available American The Rothschilds is not.  The movie apparently covered the Napoleonic period involving the Rothschild shipment of gold through France to aid Wellington in the Peninsular War.

When the Germans got around to answering these two propaganda films in the early forties with their own propaganda versions they were demeaned as, naturally, anti-Semitic.  The directors of the German Rothschild film covering the same events of the Jewish version was vilified after the war and the vilification continues to today.   The vilification of Veit Harlan, the director of this brilliant film, is carried to extremes although perhaps a tribute to his skill.

The Napoleonic episode is apparently still sensitive to the Rothschild family since the massive biography by Niall Ferguson only reaches to 1905 then pussy foots around the incident.  After pages of verbiage Ferguson refuses to come to any definite conclusion and he was given access to the family records and papers.

As these two films are key to Jewish the war I will attempt to deal with them in extenso.

The Jewish versions appeared first.  The Jew Suss was released simultaneously in England under that title and in the US titled Power.  The Rothschilds was released in the US under that name in 1934; whether it was distributed in England I don’t know but suspect so.  It must be remembered that the Jews declared war on Germany in 1933 so that these two films have to be seen as acts of war, part of an extensive ongoing campaign.  For instance in 1937 the Dreyfus Affair in France of the 1890s was revived in the US film The Life Of Emile Zola.  Zola was a French novelist who championed the cause of Dreyfus.  Alfred Dreyfus was a Jew serving as a French military officer.  He was tried and found guilty of spying.  He was certainly guilty although probably not for spying for the Germans.  Like Johnathan Pollard in the US he was turning documents over to his fellow Jews.  He spent a number of years on Devil’s Island until with the help of Zola his conviction was overturned.  The affair was a serious issue that convulsed France and apparently still does as Roman Polanski is scheduled to direct another film sometime soon.  Apparently along with slavery we should all feel guilty of the indignity that Dreyfus suffered even though he was guilty.

For the Germans the two most galling films were Jud Suss and the Rothschilds.  They answered the former in 1940 and the latter in 1943.  As films both are superior to the Jewish versions although my opinion will be objected to as anti-Semitic, but facts are facts.  The English-American Jew Suss was written by Feuchtwanger thus closely following the outline of his book.  The German film presents the story from the perspective of the Germans who were afflicted with Suss’ policies.

Both films follow the general outlines of Suss’ actions and policies.  There is no real conflict between the two versions.  In both, as well as in fact, the Duke Karl Alexander gave Suss what seems to be in our terms a Power of Attorney giving him the full authority of the Duke to do as he pleased.  His will was the Duke’s will.  Seems rather extraordinary that a ruler would give such a thing but there you have it.  It is an inexplicable action of the Duke.  One can even imagine it as his essential abdication.  Certainly the Power Of Attorney gave him the right to depose the Duke.

In any case the Money  Power as represented by Suss was placed in a superior position over the temporal power of the Duke.

After the Duke’s death this presented a legal problem for the Wurttembergers because in fact Suss was acting in the Duke’s name.  Thus Suss was absolved of all responsibility.  Unlike Feuchtwanger’s two versions, book and movie, in the German version the Wurttembergers were driven into open rebellion.  In the German version there is no indication that the Duke was murdered by Suss but the Duke had some strange degeneration losing his will.  He surrendered his own will to Suss while the Duke’s wife and his advisors all seem to have been accomplices of Suss.  Perhaps he was a master hypnotist or else how explain it.  At the end of the German version the Duke is a drunk who when confronted by the rebels flies into a rage and has a stroke or heart attack.  Goes apoplectic as they used to say.

With his death Suss’ Power of Attorney loses its validity.  He is arrested and tried.  As stated, legally he was acting as the will of the Duke having no personal responsibility.  It is interesting to note though that German soldiers under orders, therefore having no will of their own, were held responsible by the Jews for following orders in the camps.  The law is the law until it isn’t.

The German problem then is that they are bound by the rule of law and cannot violate it so as they ponder it appears that Suss must go free.

However there is a law on the books making it illegal for a Jews to have intercourse with a German girl.  While in the book and Feuchtwanger’s movie Suss had mingled with many German women including the Duke’s wife in the German version he violates the daughter of the Privy Counselor the girl then drowning herself.  The law is the law and the penalty is death.  The Privy Counselor gets his due back (law is not vengeance) by exacting the prescribed death penalty.

In Feuchtwanger’s versions Suss’ daughter committed suicide to escape the attentions of the Duke.  Thus the Germans neatly reverse the situation.

Now, the German version released in 1940 was roundly condemned by the Jews as ragingly anti-Semitic; this is strange as neither the Jewish or German versions contest the facts of Suss’ activities.  The Jews happily admit Suss’ crimes.

Both movies were released before there was a hint of a holocaust so one is at a loss to explain the Jewish sensitivity, especially so as in the US in 1940 the book The Germans Must Die by Theodore Kaufmann called for the genocide of Germans.  The Germans were thoroughly outraged by the book and its positive reception in the US causing Goebbels to exclaim that the Germans would see who died first.  Perhaps the seeds of the holocaust were planted in German minds at that time.

Jud Suss then, was the reply to the English/American production of Jew Suss.  That left the equally galling movie from the German viewpoint of The Rothschilds to answer; this was done in 1943 when the Germans replied in kind dealing with the transport of gold to Wellington in Spain during the Peninsular War against Napoleon.  The event has been kept shrouded in mystery so the Jewish guilt must be enormous.

As noted the American film to which the Germans were responding is being kept off the market as of 10/12/16 so the only conclusion is that even by Jewish standards the incident is indefensible.  We will have to infer from the German film.

As there may be readers who are not familiar with the historical account it may be appropriate to give that briefly.

When Suss had organized the Jews into a functioning unit, the ‘united’ Jews continued to develop along with the emerging new money based economy of Europe.  Excluded from the old land based wealth the Jews were uniquely positioned to seize the money based economy.

As is shown in the German Rothschild film the peasantry and even the nobility had little familiarity with numbers and were easily bamboozled by fast talking Jews who had been usurers for centuries.  This is demonstrated in both the Jewish and German versions.

The French Revolution occurred forty-nine years after Suss’ death freeing the Jews from medieval restrictions; this was called the emancipation.  The Europeans expected the Jews to abandon their parochial ways and become one people with the Europeans.

As Feuchtwanger said the Jews expected to become a sovereign entity as the Lords of Cash.

There were hurdles before them but they were swept aside when Napoleon in 1806 annexed the German principality of Hesse-Cassell.  The Landgrave of Hesse-Cassell had amassed the largest fortune in Europe by renting out his male subjects as soldiers to other States.  In the book Suss’ advises Duke Karl to hire soldiers to suppress the Duke’s subjects.  These most likely would have come from Hesse-Cassell.

The Landgrave then used the receipts to loan money to the other States and people amassing mortgages all over Europe.  Napoleon wanted the money; to avoid his getting it the Landgrave enlisted the aid of his Court Jew, Mayer Rothschild ne Bauer who secreted the fortune.  Some believe the Landgrave entrusted the whole of his fortune to Rothschild.  Niall Ferguson in his history is ambiguous waltzing around the issue.

In the German movie the Landgrave entrusts Rothschild with 650K in negotiable bills.  Changing the issues from the Landgrave to the English Jew Montifiore Mayer sent them to his son Nathan who was stationed in England.

A few years earlier Mayer had sent his ‘five arrows’ of legend to various capitals: Nathan to England, James to Paris and the three others to Berlin, Vienna and Naples.

Nathan began in the textile business in Manchester which apparently was too hard for him so he resorted to the criminal means of smuggling and other subterfuges.  The smuggling experience would stand him in good stead.  Nathan had also positioned himself in the City.  The London district known as the City is equivalent to Wall Street in the US.

When Napoleon invaded Spain the English countered by sending Wellington and an army to Spain to counter the invasion.  Operating from England the provisioning of the army was difficult.  To fund Wellington it was necessary to send gold.  The sea route was considered too precarious so an overland route was deemed necessary.  Overland meant passing through Napoleon’s citadel of France.

England was short of gold but a shipment arrived from India that was sold at auction.  The English financiers were a sort of cartel so they expected to obtain the gold.  However with the 650K in paper securities from his father (according to the German film) Nathan was in a position to outbid the cartel which he did.

He then had the only gold available to send to Wellington.  He agreed to do this for a handsome fee.  Napoleon who was retreating from Russia was defeated and sent to Elbe.  From there he would soon return to France assemble an army and meet Wellington at Waterloo.

This was a second opportunity for the Rothschilds that far surpassed the gold purchase and its transport to Spain.  This stunt would be worth in excess of ten million pounds making the Rothschilds the wealthiest family in Europe while setting the stage for the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

The price of government securities in England would depend on the results of Waterloo.  A loss, stocks down, a win stocks up.  A window of opportunity would exist between the time of the outcome and the time the news reached England.  No phones, no telegraph, no internet.  Nathan Rothschild saw his chance to cheat the people of England and he took it.  He had his agents at Waterloo to record the outcome, some say he used passenger pigeons, some say not. In any event his agents got the news of Napoleon’s defeat to him first.   Nathan created a panic by circulating the story that Wellington had been defeated.  Then when prices were at their lowest, apparently fire sale prices, he bought as much as he could.  When the news of victory arrived it was too late for the cartel.   Nathan had become the richest man in England.

Perhaps that is why as of 11/5/16 the US version of the Rothschilds is unavailable.  The facts coincide with the German version too closely.  In any event if the US version is released you may be sure it will be heavily edited, quite unlike the original.

Of course the cry is that the German versions of both movies are anti-Semitic rather than historical.  At least in the case of the Rothschilds the facts are incontrovertible.  The smuggling of the gold through France was actually known by the French authorities at the time.  The police under the direction of Fouche were not fools.  Fouche himself is credited as being brilliant.  Nor are German historians fools.  They are more than competent.  Before the two world wars German universities were considered tops in the world.  German scholars stood out as the most brilliant stars in the firmament.  German music and literature was unsurpassed.

Beginning with the Weimar Republic and Jewish dominance standards slipped while German hatred in the West led by the Jews libeled everything Germans did.  The point being there is no reason to doubt the scholarship on which the German Rothschild film is based.  The Germans are speaking from intimate knowledge of the Jews as indeed the controversy from Suss to 1950 indicates.  You need only to read Jewish-German literature to see the contempt with which Jews treat the Germans.  But if you control the propaganda as the Jews do, black may be made white and vice versa.

Hitler in his Mein Kampf clearly delineates the problem.  As he wrote, that if he and the Volkists failed their heads would roll in the sand.  This prediction was proven in the years following the defeat.  The war did not end with the allied victory but continued to rage one sidedly over the prostrate Germany for at least five years.

During 1943 the year the German Rothschild was released the extermination of the Jews was reaching maximum efficiency.  Now, we must take the Jewish threat to exterminate the Germans through castration seriously.  Had FDR not died in ’45 before hostilities ceased it is quite possible he might have ordered such an action.  He was surrounded by Jewish advisors who certainly would have encouraged him most notably his Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau Jr., who had already usurped significant Executive powers not unlike Suss himself from the Duke.

To put the matter into perspective then, the German extermination of the Jews may be seen as a preemptive strike.  The Jews have always favored preemptive strikes.  So while in 1943 the Germans had the upper hand a short time later the Jews would gain the upper hand over a completely bombed over destroyed Germany flattened by tens of thousands of bomb raids.

Fortunately there were saner heads in Washington who were aghast at the lunacy of what was now the Morgenthau plan, Kaufmann having been forgotten.  Thus, when Truman replaced FDR Morgenthau found he could no longer give orders to him as he could FDR.  When Morgenthau haughtily told Truman the he would do what Morgenthau said or Morgenthau would quit Truman merely held his hand out to accept the resignation.  At that point a great deal of the Jewish influence prominent under FDR evaporated.

But the Jewish influence had been cultivated since 1933 and was so embedded that its actions persisted.  As is not too well known Bernard Baruch, an arch-Jewish villain in this period, had cultivated his acquaintance with Eisenhower from the days of the Bonus March in 1934.  Eisenhower revered Baruch saying he had sat at his feet for twenty-six years while considering him the wisest man he knew.  The influence was so incredibly effective that Eisenhower initially ordered the extermination of the surrendered German troops.  During the winter of 1946 one of the coldest on record he left entire German armies in the open with no cover and the scantiest of rations.  He ordered that any German civilian who tried to pass food through the fence be shot dead.

The allies also perpetrated enormous crimes against the German people.  The French and Americans turned hordes of African troops and American Negroes loose to rape German women at will, not unlike Mama Merkel and the Moslems today.  The French took tens of thousands of German troops as slave labor and worked them to death.

Perhaps you say the Germans did the same but even if they did were we, the children of light, that kind of people?  Well, yes we were although it was never reported in the papers.  I grew up believing Americans were sainted people who went into battle with a holy fervor bearing the banner of a righteous Lord before us.  I grew up believing no American soldier would commit an act of injustice or cruelty.  I was lied to.

The truth has taken decades to reach me.  I should have known better because as great or greater crimes have been committed on American soil by Americans.  I was raised to believe that Sherman’s March from Atlanta to the Sea was a great military feat.  The actions of General Sheridan in the Shenandoah Valley or the evacuation of half a dozen counties around Kansas City were never mentioned but all three were horrendous crimes.  General Grant’s demand for an unconditional surrender was just that, a turning over of American minds and bodies to do with as the North liked; hence the horrors of Reconstruction.  The Southern Whites were essentially reduced to slavery.  We are that kind of people.

Thus when Roosevelt demanded unconditional surrender from the Germans it was his intent to murder the entire nation if he chose;  we are that kind of people.

Despite Obama’s assurances to the contrary he himself has declared opposition to his rule to come from Domestic Terrorists, his acolyte, Hillary Clinton has disparaged dissidents as a Basket of Deplorables, really having no right to exist.  Sorry, Barry, we are that kind of people.  Opposition to them is irredeemably bad.  The Jew, Noel Ignatiev, and various Negro leaders have demanded the extermination of the White race; therefore setting the staging in place for the extermination of half of the White population.  We are that kind of people.  We’ve done it before.

The slaughter of Germans by the allies and Soviets in the East, US, Brits and French in the West was incredible, far exceeding any German war crimes.  The post-war assault was led by the Jews.  While a small percentage of the allied peoples, the so-called war crimes trials were staffed disproportionately with Jews.  Even though the Jews first declared war against the Germans, and even though the Jews first called for the extermination of the Germans backed by the full power of the Soviet Union and the US, France and England, as in WWI the Germans were declared the aggressor nation.

Even though the Jews were murdering their so-called British allies throughout the Middle East at the exact same time the war crimes trials were held, even though the Jews in the US sent out teams of man-hunters to track down innocent men and women they deemed anti-Semites in an extra-legal manner the Jews called themselves the victims.

Even though the Jews were punishing Germans they set their man-hunters to punish the US for the ‘crime against humanity’ of not demanding a cessation of hostilities until the entire Jewish population of Europe had been removed from the hostilities to the safety of the US.  Their determination to exterminate Whites today is based on this perceived injustice.

As unremitting as ever the Jews deeply resented the German version of the Jud Suss movie.  The key Germans were tried and found guilty, some committed suicide, some were hanged outright, somewhat reminiscently of Suss, while some were subjected to cruel and unusual punishments.  The children of the German leaders were treated like animals deprived of all humanity, they were not allowed education or the right to live their lives.

Over the decades Jewish man-hunters tracked down totally insignificant German soldiers to be imprisoned or killed by judicial murders.  The man-hunters violated all international law and the rights of countries such as Argentina professing themselves to be a holy people above human laws.

Veit Harlan, the director of the superb film Jud Suss was deprived of work and hounded from pillar to post.  He had committed no crime for which he could be tried or convicted.  The movie Jud Suss was a historical film based on real incidents, in its general outline it differed in no substantial way from the Jews’ own version.  History is history and cannot be denied.  The Jewish version lauded Suss as a great Jewish hero; the German version condemned him as a great criminal.  There was no anti-Semitism so -called.

The Jews merely consider it a crime to criticize them in any way.  It is time for the dead past to bury its dead.  It is time for the Jews to leave their so-called grievances behind.  There are no innocents.  The Jews are their own problem.  They merit no special handling.