A Review Foreign Affairs Jan.-Feb. 2018

A Review: Foreign Affairs Jan.-Feb

Issue 1918

Article Two: From Nazism To Never Again

How Germany Came To Terms With Its Past

By Richard J. Evans.

Review by

R.E. Prindle

 

Foreign Affairs having first, after a manner, dealt with America’s leading issue of racial relations between Whites and Blacks, in this article attempts to tell us how to think of Germany’s so-called guilt, which is to say the relations of Germans and Jews.  This section of the magazine is titled The Undead Past:  How Nations Confront The Evils Of History.  So, once again, as in the first article of the magazine we are dealing with supposed White Guilt that has become an historical fixture.  This is a curious point of view of history in which a phase passed through is a sinful period that has to be expiated.  Is this an insane vision of Judaeo-Christianity or what?

Once again I am a dissenting voice, or, as I think, a voice of reason.

While Mr. Evans concentrates on Germany’s supposed guilt the cause of the guilt, the Jewish crocodile lurking the in weeds doesn’t come under examination and yet, without Jews, no German guilt.  A strange quietness.

Here a few words about Professor Richard Evans, sometime of Cambridge University.  I will simply quote the Editors’ fluff page:

Quote:

When the Holocaust denier David Irving sued an American academic for libel in 2000, the historian Richard Evans served as expert witness, providing the key evidence proving that Irving had distorted the record.  Evans, who was until 2014 a professor of history at Cambridge University has written many books on modern German history, including a celebrated three-volume history of the Third Reich.  In “From Nazism To Never Again…Evans described how successfully Germany has come to terms with its past. 

Unquote.

The unstated object of Mr. Evans piece is how not only Germany but we hope also how we have come to terms with our own implied guilt for Germany’s past.  This is a much more complex issue than America’s problem with Negro slavery.  The past must never die until Whites have been severely punished for all the evil they have created in an otherwise peaceful, tranquil world.  Thus the Editors emphasize that Mr. Evans gave the crucial piece of evidence that destroyed David Irving’s, very likely, justified defense.

For the cognoscenti, Mr. Irving was at one time the most prominent expert investigator of the Jewish holocaust.  While he lost the suit, which he should never have brought before a court that could not help but be biased in favor of the Jews, to some extent Mr. Irving has gone a long way towards winning the war.  There has been a lot of revision in the writing of that holocaust history since the trial.

The Jews have been forced to abandon many telling propaganda points.  An example is that the notion that six million were scientifically exterminated is no longer tenable.  The Jews have adjusted their number much lower. And while most people still believe that the six million met their fate in Auschwitz gas chambers, the total number of Jews and others who died there now is estimated at a little over a million.

Although it is a crime in most of Europe to even question any aspect of the Jewish holocaust or even to discuss the war, a revision of the whole camp system is in progress so that a more accurate idea of what happened is on the horizon.  In that sense Mr. Irving drove the Jews from the high ground winning the war of words although he lost the battle of the court room.  For Mr. Evans and indeed for the West it seems that the belief is that history begins with Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and all history since stems from that momentary snapshot of the past.  Mr. Evans makes no attempt to put the era into an historical perspective.  For him the past is not a flowing movie but merely a series of snapshots.  There is slight mention of Jews except as victims of their holocaust.  At no time are they mentioned as one of the combatant nations of Europe, while, in fact, the Jews of the world declared war on Hitler specifically from the day he was elected. While the Jews and Nazis had been at war within Germany from the end of the World War,  guilt should be distributed more evenly.  True, as a result of their declared war on Germany theJews lost that war and the casualties of the holocaust must be attributed to that loss.

Nor did the Jewish-German war begin in the twentieth century.  Apart from being treated as an alien intrusion within Europe for two thousand years the modern German-Jewish war was shaped up in the eighteenth century under the aegis of a fellow called Jud Suss.  Suss was the most important of the Jews of the modern period surpassing even the role of the Rothschilds, as he was the originator.  I have treated the period at some length in my review of Lion Feuchtwanger’s novel Jud Suss and the four movies that arose from it.  Two Jewish accusations and two German refutations.  This literary war covered the years 1926 through 1942.  It is central to the armed conflict between Germany and, actually, the world, more specifically the Soviet Union.

I will briefly recapitulate some of my review mentioned above.  Suss  Oppenheimer, was a Jewish adventurer who hit the jackpot when he met Prince Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg.  Suss insinuated himself into Karl’s good graces much as the worm does to the apple.

Over the course of only a couple years Suss managed to change the whole nature of the State of Wurttemberg.  While Jews had been forbidden residence in Wurttemberg Suss managed to get them entrance so that long wagon trains of Jews are shown entering Stuttgart.  That achieved Suss managed to obtain monopolies on all commodities so that the Jews prospered while the Germans became impoverished.  Bear in mind I am repeating the story as Feuchtwanger wanted it understood, I am adding nothing. 

Suss increased the expenses of both the Prince and Wurttemberg inventing ever newer taxes to fund them.  He even managed to get Karl to make roads toll roads so that the Germans had to pay to move around their country.

To cap the climax Suss, who was dishonoring German women at a prodigious rate, even seduced Karl’s wife turning her against him.  Of course at Karl’s early death, when he was no long around to protect Suss, an angry Wurttemberg arrested him while he claimed innocence of any wrong doing claiming that he was only following orders. (He following orders; in what context have we heard that used as a defense before?), was nevertheless found guilty and sentenced to death thereby becoming a Jewish martyr.

After shouting anti-Semitism is an effort to shame the Wurttembergers, who refused to be shamed, the Jewish defense was that Suss never died, did he.  While the Germans put the dead Suss on display in a gallows thirty feet high, Feuchtwanger said the Jews somehow managed to substitute Suss’ body with someone else thus thwarting the goyim’ just resentment.

The lesson Feuchtwanger is giving his fellow Jews is how easily the German’s or goyim (as Roosevelt would be played by Morgenthau in the US a few years hence) could be manipulated and have their States taken over without a real effort or bloodshed.   Indeed, Hitler’s greatest sin was that he upset their takeover of Weimar Germany, more or less per Feuchtwanger’s example, of which they were about to crown their achievement.

Thus, the Rothchilds who began their rise on the back of Suss’ success, following his example, insinuated  themselves into the government of Hesse-Cassell, using its capital of Frankfurt as their own to direct their Europe wide activities.  These activities formed the content of the two Rothchild films.  And from thence the Rothschilds achieved a hegemony of Europe and became a major influence in the nascent United States.

Using Communism as their springboard the Jews were seeking the opportunity to seize Europe and they found their opportunity in Russia which was seized in 1917 by the Communist Revolution.  While the Russian, or Jewish Revolution, actually, caught the Europeans by surprise, there had been many portents including the Russo-Japanese war as well as the failed Revolution in Russia of 1905.  If you were reading the US right during the Wilson administration of 1912-20 it was as plain as day.

In keeping with the growing threat of the Jewish led revolution Lion Feuchtwanger, developing his vision of Jud Suss, wrote a play in 1916 on the career of Suss before working up his novel on Suss published in 1926.  The play was not well received, if it was ever performed, but the book made quite an impression both in German and in translation in England and the US.  My copy of an English cheap reprint is the 148^th thousand.  The movie Jud Suss, a propaganda film, was released in 1933 almost in anticipation of the Hitler triumph in Germany and the Jewish declaration of war against the country.  Jud Suss was produced in England, and distributed in the US under the title Power.  That title should be indicative of Feuchtwanger’s intent.

This propaganda was then followed by the Jewish propaganda production of The Rothschilds by Hollywood.  The production may have seemed wise in the conditions of the time but as the movie is conspicuously missing today perhaps it is better for the Jewish cause that the movie not be seen.  In any event in 1942 the Nazis countered with their own magnificent production of The Rothschilds.  This movie is allowed to be in release although it is a severe indictment of both the Rothschilds and the Jews.

And so the matter stood with the German defeat beginning in 1943.  The above provides a German-Jewish background to the Foreign Affairs article by Richard J. Evans.

-2-

While the Germans lost the war- and how- the Jews lost the battle as between Germany and the Soviet Union millions lost their lives upsetting for the time being their conquest of Europe.  But, like a starfish when you cut it in two you have merely created two starfish.  While two, possibly three million were killed in Europe, five million or more lived on and they were in control of Roosevelt’s administration.  FDR’s Director of the Treasury Department was a Jew by the name of Henry Morgenthau Jr.  Morgenthau boasted that he was nearly a twin of Roosevelt considering himself as a co-president.

Significantly Morgenthau’s very revealing three volume autobiography has disappeared from the inter-net, no longer available in any form.  Even used copies are unavailable.  I was able to buy Vol. II before it disappeared, missing a Vol. I and multi-hundred dollar Vol. III through ignorance of what the volumes revealed.  Had I known I probably would have dished out for expensive Vol. III.  Perhaps some very carefully edited reprints may emerge.

Vol. III is most important because it contains his Morgenthau Plan for the post-war extermination of the German people.  It is gone.

Morgenthau’s association with Roosevelt went way back to the time the two families lived a short distance from each other in Dutchess County.  HM Jr. had insinuated himself into the Roosevelt family as he began his political career and could be found in uninvited attendance at every social or political gathering.  As he said to associates during his tenure at Treasury, he didn’t relish the job but he was there on duty that he was also serving Jewish interests for all those earlier years.

Unfortunately for his and Jewish plans FDR began his third term as a very sick man, dying as his fourth term began.  The least he could do for his country.  Morgenthau’s relations with his successor, Harry Truman, were non-existent.  Truman disliked and distrusted him.  When his post-war plans for Germany became known horrifying Truman et al. the Pres. began thinking of terminating his employment.  Thus when Morgenthau haughtily told Truman before the Potsdam Summit with Stalin that he was to be taken along or he would resign the Pres. graciously and promptly accepted his resignation.  Direct Jewish control ended there.

-3-

It is important to remember that no surrender was possible for the Germans other than unconditionally.  That is that the conquered is not allowed to stipulate any conditions such as the soldiers may return to their homes, keep their guns etc.  Besides Germany as a country was piles of rubble having been carpet bombed flat.

Total destruction of the enemy was not new to US policy as during the Civil War and Sherman’s march from Atlanta to the sea and back up through South Carolina was total destruction with even food stores being destroyed in the hope that the Secessionists would starve to death as part of their punishment for seceding.  And then General Grant demanded unconditional surrender from Lee.  That meant that Lee surrendered all rights of the Southern Whites.  The Whites of the South were virtually enslaved while being put under the dominion of the Negroes so, with the unconditional surrender of Germany, all the rules and ‘laws’ governing treatment of the conquered were abrogated by General Eisenhower. 

Thus, Eisenhower, who was a devotee of the Jew Bernard Baruch sought, or what he did was the same, to exterminate whole armies of German soldiers leaving them exposed without shelter in a very cold winter while putting them on starvation rations.  This is what America, the light of the world did.

Nor were the Nazis solely responsible for the war.  The war was a war for survival.  In his Mein Kampf Hitler said that he knew that if his Volkists failed against the Judaeo-Communists that German heads would roll in the sand.  A grim prophecy that came true.  His war did not begin in 1939, it began in 1914.  The second world war was merely the continuation of the first.  The key event of this period was the Communist Revolution in Russia of 1917 and the years following. The war in the East did not end in 1918.  The Armistice began a period of extreme terror on the part of the Bolsheviks, that is to say, the Jews.  The events of this horror have been suppressed.  They enter no history books.  If you want to lose your academic position even thinking about the atrocities will cost you your job. 

The Civil War began in Russia as the result of the Bolshevik takeover as Loyalists attempted to oust the Reds was one of Jews killing Russians and Russians retaliating against Jews.  As just one example, Bela Kun, the Hungarian Butcher, after being ousted from that country moved to the Crimean Peninsula.  At the time the Jews were seeking a territory to form a nation State.  Stalin had offered Birobidjan in Eastern Siberia but they declined the offer.

They wanted instead the Crimea.  Of course there was a Jewish colony in the Crimea but the majority was non-Jewish.  Kun’s idea was to exterminate the non-Jewish population.  He began by weighing the feet of these people and tossing them into the Black Sea, sort of a Russian East River.  Word quickly got back to Moscow and Kun was recalled before he could complete his task.  Stalin put Bela out of misery in 1936.

These atrocities had not gone unnoticed by the rest of Europe.  You may be sure Hitler was well informed.  So, the holocaust of Europeans far outweighed the holocaust of the Jews.  But, who now remembers the Russian, Hungarian and Crimean atrocities.   They have been removed from the history books.  The Jews portray themselves as innocent victims; only the goys are evil.  Therefore, all blame was placed on the Germans, even Russian atrocities were denied and covered up but when Stalin died they were allowed to surface to discredit that fine gentleman.

And so Richard J. Evans asks in his article, is it possible for the Germans to atone for their crimes as though they were singular.  Neither Morgenthau nor Eisenhower succeeded in killing them so now the Jews have to try to thoroughly emasculate them, stultify them beyond recognition. 

The question becomes what is the historical narrative the CFR is creating and following and who is the ultimate beneficiary.  The problem that the Liberal Coalition had to face in 1920 when the public failed to embrace Woodrow Wilson’s post-war plans was how to correct the public’s failure and make them see the CFR light.  Obviously since an authoritarian dictatorship couldn’t be immediately established as in the then Soviet Union to compel people to accept it while slaughtering  those who wouldn’t follow along.  Another effective measure must be found.

Now, Wilson’s war years had been an authoritarian dictatorship that could have been the envy of Lenin and Trotsky.  Without violence the US population had made a 180 degree turn from individualism to collectivism.  This attitude was to survive the war in modified form in both parties but most especially among the Democrats.  A key in establishing Wilson’s authoritarian system was the use of the propaganda agency under George Creel called The Committee On Public Information- the CPI- the I should have stood for indoctrination.  The CPI was a no holds barred move on a formerly independent American psyche.  Creel bombarded the public with every known means and then invented some.  Of course, Creel was a decent God fearing all-American boy but given the direction and power he pragmatically became a force for the ultimate evil.  He released every anti-social impulse known, finks and informers abounded.  By war’s end the entire population was into a Democratic lockstep.

Creel’s phenomenal success in capturing, as it were, the will of the entire country did not go unnoticed.  It was seen how easily the psyche of individuals could be turned into permanent mob psychology directed to a single purpose.  Thus after the 1920 election when the public rejected joining Wilson’s League of Nations, a big belief of Wilsonites, it was determined to create an organization to function on Creel’s principles to direct the nation’s psyche toward the desired goal.  This organization was the CFR- Council On Foreign Relations.

At the same time one of Creel’s staffers, the Jew Edward Bernays acting on the behest of the AJC- American Jewish Committee- formed a campaign that in combination with the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith took the same propagandistic approach to control the American psyche in relation to its attitude toward the Jewish people.

Bernays was the nephew of Sigmund Freud through Freud’s wife.  Freud joined the B’nai B’rith in 1895 as his psycho-analytic career commenced.  B’nai B’rith, founded in the US in 1843, became a vast international organization.  Freud came to their Vienna lodge which he attended religiously throughout his life in Vienna.  Through the B’nai B’rith he became a prime mover in Jewish affairs.  It would seem inevitable that his psychological experience would be put to use through the B’nai B’rith.  Bernays himself visited his Uncle Sigmund in Vienna undoubtedly learning much at the feet of this supreme Jewish guru.  Freud entrusted him with several works for translation into English.  Thus, Edward Bernays became one of the top public relations propagandists in the twenties thirties and forties influencing many American mores and habits.

In the course of things both groups, the CFR and the Jewish organizations joined forces combining efforts while making Jewish prerogatives their main objective as in this article by Richard J. Evans.

Out of office for the twelve years of the Republican Interregnum they were less effective, slow to get moving, but after sabotaging Hoover’s four years in office they were getting their man Franklin Delano Roosevelt  into office along with a whole phalanx or two of very effective Jewish operatives and goyish acolytes trained by the Harvard law professor Felix Frankfurter.  He was rewarded with an appointment to the ‘Jewish seat’ of the Supreme Court when the ‘American Isaiah’ Justice Brandeis died.

FDR, of course, had the most controversial presidency in American history but by the end of his career in 1945 the CFR and Jews were firmly in control by controlling the American psyche.  By 1945, of course, they realized that you don’t have to put an issue up for discussion, you could just present the public with a fait accompli and the public would accept it.   Hence, unlike the debate over the League Of Nations that ended so disastrously for them the country was presented by the fact that the United Nations was in existence.

Thus, the narrative Mr. Evans, employed by the CFR, follows in his article concerning the post-war German psyche is that of the CFR and the Jews with the Jews being the ultimate beneficiary.

Mr. Evans and the CFR confess as much in the closing words of Mr. Evans commissioned article:

Quote:

The party (AfD) has said that it wants to end Germany’s sense of responsibility for the German past, but with so many solid and prominent memorials to the victims (Jews only) of Nazism scattered across the land, from the Stolpersteine to the concentration camp memorials, it is difficult to see how that would happen.  Such physical reminders of the crimes of Hitler and the Nazis confront Germans every day; and while a small minority may not like this, they have no choice but to put up with it.  When it comes to accepting the sins of the past there is, in the end, no alternative for Germany.

Unquote.

An interesting passage, a singular narrative shared by the CFR and the Jews.  Germany, that is, all Germans, must pay for the past, a past which after all, Americans, Jews, Russians, yes, even the English and French contributed their share of horrendous evils.  Thus, the Germans are selected as scapegoats to bear the sins and crimes of humanity.  Jesus on the Rhine.  Now, as the Jews point out about themselves, the crimes of a few Jews do not reflect on all Jews.  Their personal morality does not apply to the Germans.  The Third Reich was not erected in an European vacuum.  Indeed, was it not erected in reaction to horrors perpetrated by Jews and their Communist allies in Hungary, the Crimea and Russia itself?  Were not Russians  crucified on telegraph poles along hundreds of miles of railroad tracks.  It is said that chemicals were applied to hands causing them to shrink, come loose and flap in the wind at the wrists.  Is that not as or more insane than any concentration camp?  Is that not a European holocaust to equal any Jewish holocaust?

There is no use in denying any of these horrendous crimes anymore than there is any use in denying the Jewish holocaust.  They are all well documented but carefully suppressed except for the Jewish holocaust which is endlessly accentuated.  They are well documented but carefully suppressed by the Jews in order to maintain their innocent victimhood.  This cauldron of hatred and crime had been committed well before Hitler became Hitler and the Nazis assumed power.  Were not these crimes as horrible that they had to be denied, had to be suppressed no less than the meager crimes of the Nazis?

Are the German people expected, like American Whites and Negroes, to accept full responsibility for a world they never made but only came into?   No.  Absolutely not.  No living person is responsible.  Reject the notion out of hand.

As Mr. Evans article implies, are the Germans expected to pick up flails like the Medieval flagellants and stumble (stolper) through the world flagellating their backs while crying something like:  Woe is me, I didn’t put the Jews above me.  Something like the Wandering Jew of legend continually roaming the world until the Second Coming?  Are we jesting?

To quote Mr. Evans:  A small minority might not like this, they have no choice but to put up with it.’  A small minority might not like this?  A vast majority does not like this but only a small minority has the courage to brave prison sentences by objecting.

They have no choice?  Ah, but they do have a choice; they can put their stick in the spokes of an unjust ruling minority and bring the evil machine to a stop.  They can demand an end to this nonsense; they can demand the equity of the rest of Europe, that includes the Jews, who demand that they accept their emasculation and become eunuchs, useless drones.  And who is the beneficiary of this crime against humanity?  Self-righteous Whites  and bumptious Jews.  I get nothing out of this crime.  Do you?