The Myth Of The Twenty-First Century The Red Octopus Vs. The Nazi Hydra

The Myth Of The Twenty-First Century

The Red Octopus vs. The Nazi Hydra

Multi-Culturists Seeking A Monoculture

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The agenda of the Octopus hasn’t changed since its inception in the French Revolution, nor have its methods.  Invoked in 1789 it faced entrenched cultural norms and mores that seemed unchangeable.  But the Unnamed Superiors attacked the problem with determination and ingenuity.  While there were always dissenting minorities in the grand manner European mores could be divided between Christian mores and Jewish mores.  This had been a societal problem in societies since Jewish mores had come into existence in 2000 BC during the transition from the Age of Taurus to the Age of Aries.  The problem was exacerbated during the transition from Aries to Pisces.  Jewish Taurian mores became even more antiquated and hence distinct thus always being in conflict with the societies they inhabited.

Largely suppressed in Europe during the Christian centuries while marginalized as a people the French Revolution emancipated both mores and people allowing them to compete on more favorable terms of which they took and have taken full advantage.  Without resources or population to seek a military solution the Jews chose to project a cultural war.  To augment their numbers and gain credibility they chose a ‘multi-cultural’ approach.  They evolved the tactic of combining with other minority groups against the dominant culture.

Led sometimes by brilliant figures such as Sigmund Freud and sometimes dogged battlers not quite so brilliant they sought to undermine the mores of the dominant culture.  Thus following the tutelage of Sigmund Freud they constantly ridiculed the dominant cultures mores while putting themselves forward as faultless paragons of virtue.

Of course as critics they never had to try the faultless abilities they said they possessed.  When their opportunity came with the founding of Israel in 1948 they came a-cropping on all accounts.

As the leading exponent of multi-culturalism the Jews have been immensely successful.  They are the engine that drives multi-culturalism.  For some reason the dominant culture refuses to acknowledge this monumental people’s contribution to history.  You can read multi-volume histories of the world that hardly mention Jewish contributions to fundamental changes in societies.  Even in our day Sigmund Freud has been discarded by the dominant culture as some kind of crank.  His tremendous influence goes unrecognized.

Of course, to exclude a whole people of such significance distorts that history out of recognition, especially, as I say, they are the engine, the heart of the Red Octopus.

The Octopus always takes the virtuous approach.  They always appear to mean good.  There is no direct assault on the dominant culture.  The effort is always to seize on a shortcoming of the culture and use that as a critical lever to separate the society into its component separate cultures.  The United States was tailor made for the process with its plethora of races and nationalities patched together and held in place by the dominant culture that constantly gave ground.

A very similar situation occurred in the Austrian Empire including the two semi-autonomous kingdoms of Hungary and Austria held together by a dominant German culture that disintegrated under the stress of two world wars in the twentieth century.  The Jews were the active solvent there too.

Russia also was an amalgamation of diverse cultures and nationalities that was actually conquered by a Jewish led revolution.

The Second World War escalated the dissolution of unity in the United States.  There was one attempt from 1870 to 1945 to meld all the various cultures into a melting pot of a single culture in the Aryan mold.  The method was wrong; the Jews devised a proper method possibly in the early years of the twentieth century under the tutelage of Sigmund Freud; dissolution from below rather than from above with a reintegration hopefully into one monoculture, one set of mores, and those Jewish.

Eighteenth and nineteenth century culture was unitary in approach on both continents, Europe and North America, under the direction of the dominant Aryan culture.  The transition from a monarchical  system to a democratic or bourgeois system opened society up to various social forces that were not possible under a monarchy.  Rather than a single directing head there were a multitude of competing heads.

Thus, as the US emerged from WWII in 1945 the Jews were the better organized to achieve their goals.  This semi-autonomous organized powerful self-sufficient people began the direction of the Red Octopus.

In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the media consisted of newspapers and magazines and word of mouth, rather poor means for the dissemination of propaganda compared to the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century invention of electrical media such as movies, radio, TV and phonographs records.  These were the means to quickly change mores and change the direction of society. It is no coincidence that in a democracy the Jews seized all them including old fashioned print.  With these in their control within a short fifty to sixty years they had dispensed with Aryan mores and set society on its head in preparation for the new Jewish monoculture.

Let us first consider the use of the phonographs record as a medium of change.

 

To be continued…