Thursday, November 17, 2016

The Constitution Vs. Foreign Invasion


The Constitution Vs. Foreign Invasion

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Wonder of all wonders.  The Trump presidency may be the first in history to do what it promised.  Kris Kobach of the administration is reported by the hostile press to suggest that the Trump administration may require Moslems to register with the government as foreign agents.

Naturally the Liberals are agog that such a thing could happen rushing precipitously to the Constitution which they believe requires the protection of enemy operatives within US borders.  My supposition is that they don’t read well while having the weakest intellectual faculties.  Why do they suppose that any government, Constitution or no, must allow enemy paramilitaries to operate freely in its territory?

One expects nothing from Liberals, and gets it, but this attitude boggles the imagination.  On what grounds are we to tolerate the bombing of a marathon race, the murder of fifty people at a nightclub or the shooting up of a Christmas party?

On what grounds are we to dismiss the ranting of a Moslem ‘scholar’ who says that the Moslems are going to take over the country and impose the jizya tax on Christians and if they won’t pay it, fight them?  In Moslem terminology you can read  ‘Christian’ for non-Moslem.

Thank god we have a President who isn’t going to sit idly by or encourage this to happen while Liberals dither over whether it is Constitutional  to allow invaders to occupy the country.

It seems only yesterday that these same Liberals were screaming that the Constitution was antiquated and should have no force.

First and Second Amendments?  What First and Second Amendments?  They shrilled.

Obama may have been a Moslem who wished for a Moslem State with Sharia law but the US has ejected him and his acolyte Clinton.  It’s a New Day, a New Hope and Change that We can believe in.  Send the Moslems packing.

No comments:

Post a Comment