The Rising Tide Of Anti-Semitism And Jewish Hysteria

The Rising Tide Of Anti-Semitism

And Jewish Hysteria

by

R.E. Prindle

 

http://www.onenewsnow.com/education/2015/02/03/jewish-frat-tagged-with-swastikas-after-uc-wide-israel-boycott#.VNKeRctTE5s

 

One has to wonder about the Jews.  In 1964 when there was no anti-Semitism in the US except in the minds of the Jews caused by their reaction to events of WWII, perhaps from boredom and needing some excitement the Jews decided to create some anti-Semitism.  In 1965 they pushed through a new immigration law that invited their Moslem arch-enemies into the US.

While billing themselves as the most intelligent people on earth they failed to learn from their own 1900 immigration experience.  In Poland, for instance, where they were a minority, they claim there was outrageous anti-Semitism.  Well and good.  But, when the Jews and Poles mixed in the US the tables were equalized so that Jews were able to punish Poles.

Now, in Israel backed by the financial and military might of the US with additional billions of guilt dollars from Germany Jews were able to maintain an oppressive upper hand punishing Moslems.

Today, as a result of the ’65 immigration law Moslems outnumber Jews in the US and the roles are reversed as with the Jews and Poles.  So, the ‘smartest people in the world’ claim anti-Semitism is on the rise in the US.  That’s a surprise isn’t it?  They imply that the country as a whole is increasingly anti-Semitic.  In fact Whites in the US have been cowed, yes, Whites exist under civil disabilities instituted by the Jews.  They’re called ‘hate laws.’  The problem is between Jews and the Moslems they invited into the country.  The Middle East war has been translated to the US.  Let’s face it, it is purely a Jewish problem.  What do we Whites care?

Now at UC-Davis we are told by someone called Michael F. Haverluck that a great crime has been perpetrated against a Jewish fraternity house.  The ‘crime’ is what was called a harmless prank back in the fifties.  A number of swastikas were apparently placed on the frat house walls.  (See link above.)  How you can spray anything on an inhabited frat house on an active campus and not get caught in the act mystifies me.

Nevertheless there the swastikas are.  But the perps are unknown.  In the rising tide of Jewish hysteria the Jews fail to note that, if not their own hoax which is probable, then the only possible perps must be Moslems.  Who else?  Why don’t the Jews make the obvious claim rather than pretending that perhaps Chinese, did it?  Mexicans?  Maybe Martians?  Who in their multi-cultural paradise are the Jews blaming?

Instead the Jews pretend that they are alone in a totally hostile environment.  I don’t know if the Jews on the UC campi have looked around them but if they do they will have to search hard for a White face.  I was on the Berkeley campus a couple years ago and passing through a long row of kiosks there were Moslem, Mexican, Filipino and whatever else info booths and I was hard pressed to find anyone who wasn’t Asian- East or West.  In fact, there were no White exhibitors.

The Whites I did see on campus were wasted drug addicts walking around in rags, literally.

So, if anti-Semitism is becoming a problem for Jews on UC’s campi I suggest they address their fellow Moslem Semites to see if they can smooth out the problem.  It’s you Jews, stupid, not us.  We’re functioning under the civil disabilities imposed on us by them.  All I can say is a plague on both Semitic houses, Jews and Moslems.  We don’t care what happens to either.

As for Haverluck, he should try for a less tendentious style

Little Rock, Ocean Hill-Brownsville And Community Control Of Schools

Little Rock, Ocean Hill-Brownsville

And Community Control

Of Schools

by

R.E. Prindle

The Negro Revolution didn’t end with the San Domingo Moment. It began with it. A shiver of realization of danger passed down the spines of Americans a mere hundred miles away in the years leading to the Civil War. Would US Negroes do the same? The Civil War, Reconstruction and Jim Crow intervened. Not until after the Brown vs. The Board Of Education Supreme Court ruling of 1954 was the conflict resumed. This obtuse decision set off a train of crimes continuing till today.

Well meaning but ignorant Liberals thought they were doing a good deed. They refused to understand the differences between the Negro mind and the Aryan mind, consciousness and experience. The Negroes already had an established education system suited to their mentality, schools and more importantly Negro teachers. The teachers, by the way, all lost their jobs.

It was thought by Whites that Negroes were getting inferior educations so that the only remedy Liberals could conceive of in their condescension was to put Negroes in Aryan schools but European and US Aryan culture had little relevance to the Negro mind, and, why should it?

The assault on Aryan schools by the well meaning but bumbling Eisenhower was taken up earnestly a la the Soviet invasion of Hungary. Tanks and army troops were employed against US citizens to force them to do what was to their disadvantage, that is, admit Negroes to their schools. They knew the resultant racial conflict would destroy the quality of their children’s education as has been proven to be true.

The Negroes befuddled by the works of Shakespeare and that old standby of George Eliot, Silas Marner, that had no relevance to their experience hence incomprehensible. The curriculum of the Negro schools was discarded so that to the Negro minds the Aryans were committing cultural genocide on them which was true. The Aryans however could not understand this.

The issue came to a head in the New York City school system about fourteen years after the Supreme Court decision in 1968. The foreign world of teacher unions and the infrastructure of the NYC system became oppressive to the Negroes and they rebelled, justly so. They wanted Community Control of their own schools as before the Supreme Court decision to set their own curriculum devised for what they perceived to be their own needs.

Thus the area of Brooklyn known as Ocean Hill-Brownsville was selected for the initial phase of their revolt. While the disturbances at Little Rock and other place had been mild affairs with only token resistance by the Aryans the Negroes became righteously violent, closing the schools and throwing the Aryan and Jewish teachers out with extreme threats of physical harm if they came back.

In the Negro case the Army with its tanks and armored vehicles were not deployed for fear of actual warfare. While apparently willing to kill Aryans in the years succeeding the Supreme Court decision the government actually feared hurting Negroes in their insurrection. And the Negroes, not surprisingly, won, while the Aryans with their respect for Law, lost.

The NYC government under Mayor John Lindsay backed down surrendering to the Negroes’ demands. Three years later NYC re-conquered the district but by that time Liberal insanity was running amuck as they bussed Negro students into Aryan school districts destroying educational standards. The crazy Liberals fondly imagined Negroes would embrace the very difficult language of Shakespeare and the incomprehensible vanity of George Eliot. I mean, you know, these works were difficult enough for Aryans who had little familiarity with the England of four hundred and one hundred years earlier.

So the point is what is wrong with the Negro position of Community Schools for both Negroes and Aryans with a suitable curriculum for each? Why should Negroes be force fed Shakespeare and Algebra or Aryan Ebonics and slave culture?

Let each have their own schools as was the situation before the disastrous Brown vs. Board Of Education ruling.

Why not let reason and common sense prevail?

It Takes A Village...? Part One

It Takes A Village…?

Part One

by

R.E. Prindle

Hillary Clinton

Among the great Communist ideas for transforming society is communal upbringing of children. Supposedly a loving family environment is dangerous to society as it inculcates individual ideas. The Red propagandists led by their beauteous cheer leader Mrs. Clinton counter with “It takes a village to raise a child.’ This is supposed to be a West African saying where one is led to believe that children are not parented but communalized.

As the West Africans have discovered this ideal solution to child rearing it may pay to examine the ideal society that this ideal method has produced.

In the first place there are numerous West African legends concerning social and political organization having been brought to them by legendary White people; that is that sometime in the last millennium shipwrecked sailors landed on the African coast where they tutored the Africans in the rudiments of social living. Rudiments is the key word here.

Prior to the Whites obviously destroying their even more tribal or perhaps even more dissociated living, I mean they might have been real cavemen, Africa must have been totally perfect although without any of the comforts we poor irrational Whites have come not only to expect but demand. And of course the poor Africans corrupted by White comforts have moved further and further from their primitive perfection.

Back then, and I stress, back then, when whole villages reared the village children while parents apparently counted for nothing but baby machines, West Africans had evolved the perfect social organization in which 30% had enslaved the remaining 70%. Such was the situation in the nineteenth century. This social arrangement of course solved the employment problem for the 30%, who perhaps preferred not to do the dirty work the 70% were compelled to do it will they, nil they. Of course, slavery was benign amongst these primitive people unlike the savage practices of more civilized peoples.

So these poor shmoes apparently devised a communal method of rearing the village’s, not the parent’s, offspring. Mrs. Clinton applauds them furiously. While this plan may or may not have reared a jolly lot of kids, beaming joyfully as they slaved in the fields, they remained too stupid to improve their lot doing little to advance creature comforts until the next wave of White people arrived, not to show them how this time, but just give the goods to the beaming children of a communal upbringing. No wonder they’re said to be laughing all the time.

And now this example of perfection is recommended to us by the Commuists as the ideal solution to our civilizational problems.

Unfortunately our Red savants seem intent on re-introducing slavery in support of such communal upbringing.. But shifting into an almost sci-fi mode lets look at the probable consequences of such perfection as imposed from above. Follow along in Part Two.

Infinite Knowledge And The Finite Mind

Infinite Knowledge And The Finite Mind

by

R.E. Prindle

The world is fast approaching a very perilous situation. It is not a question of human perfidy but the unavoidable consequence of the accumulation of knowledge. While accumulated knowledge is growing exponentially the human mind is diminishing in capacity compounded by a concentration on the wrong things.

The ability to organize and manage the exploding quantity of knowledge exceeds the ability of the human mind to synthesize. The fraction of knowledge the ablest, the most capacious human minds can absorb is miniscule. The problem is compounded by our very inadequate educational system based on favoritism rather than merit. The level of the best is inexorably drawn down.

The problem of barely educating the most intelligent and mentally capable percentage of the population that amounts to no more than fifteen percent of the total within a reasonable time, say 30 years of age, is made difficult to impossible by the basic needs of the individual- maturation, sex, indolence, hazards such as drugs and alochol, mental fixations and illnesses and what have you.

As at least a full fifty percent of the population can be written off as totally incapable of abstract thinking, the remaining thirty-five percent is barely educable and trainable for ordinary tasks.

Even the most intelligent can be educated to only one discipline or a sub-set of a discipline. To be expert, for instance, in the study of proteins is to unfit the individual for most other technical or cultural subjects. Of course in becoming expert in one field does give one an operating method that can be used to transfer to or include another discipline but the effort takes time and dilutes the knowledge of both or more fields. The nature of memory is that it fades if not constantly used. This is unavoidable.

Human nature and envy being what it is the odds are that the most capable may not do well in the social battle while the much less capable are cunning at manipulating others to obtain their ends. Hence we have a politically able but intellectual dimwit serving as President of the United States, as well as, one might add, most other heads of State. They act from ideology rather than circumstances. It would appear that one of the least capable mentalities serving as head of State in North Korea is quite capable of bringing down the whole of civilization from its present precarious state.

There appears to be no solution to this problem. It is merely a bottleneck that the human race will not be able to pass through.

Bozos rule the world and will continue to do so. Hence, enjoy it while you can; it can’t matter. It has just gotten too complex for the human mind to manage.