It Takes A Village...? Part Two

It Takes A Village…?

Part Two

by

R.E. Prindle

The Communists, like the Africans, and also the Semites, prefer static unchanging societies. They have correctly understood the family unit as the engine directing psychological and intellectual evolution, thus, in order to return to the primitive condition it is necessary to destroy civilization. Freud presented their argument in his pamphlet Civilization And Its Discontented.

What then is the goal of the Communist version of the communal upbringing of children? The first point is to destroy intellectual differentiation, bringing all intellects to the same level. Education breeds differentiation so education must be destroyed. Wealth breeds differentiation so everyone must be reduced to economic equality, property must be declared criminal. Individual families breed differentiation so the family must be destroyed. It is imagined that these actions will create ‘equality.’ Only when all marks of excellence are destroyed can a just society be created Communists believe.

Of course philosophically there doesn’t have be any thought of how such a program can be realized. But on a practical basis how is it to be achieved? Now, anyone who has experienced the village and the family experience can tell you the result.

I spent a few years in the orphanage which is to say in the ultimate communal situation although the armed forces come close. There is constant bickering and fighting as the most aggressive seek to bring all others under their control. Only then can they feel secure. If the situation was controlled at all, which it wasn’t, it was only moderated by the administrators and the house mothers neither of which would acknowledge who the aggressors were. Thus crime and violence is the communal norm as ‘equals’ squabble for dominance or the position of ‘first among equals‘, or in other words, masters and slaves. This is what ‘it takes a village to raise a child’ means.

Thus in the current social struggle here in the US, the Global Money Trust is seeking to establish dominion over the ‘slave’ classes. An equality of ignorance is being sought as totally ignorant people are being hauled out of the jungles of Africa, not unlike the slave days of yore, diluting the established scientifically educated Old Stock.

Manufacturing has been shipped out of the country while the hordes of ‘new’ people are given preference for the mainly government positions available. Thus those with merit are pushed aside while the incapable take their place. On a local scale this replicates the situation in places like South Africa and Zimbabwe.

The better and educated and much feared White male is placed at the bottom of the employment ladder. University student bodies are currently roughly 60% female and when you factor in the huge foreign male population the domestic White male may represent only 25% or less of the student bodies. Thus he is slowly reduced to or below the common level.

He is taught in school to not attempt to excel. Now as ignorant as can be he will be easily manageable . Slave material shuffling along.

Thus a two class society like nineteenth century Africa is aimed at- the Global Money Trust masters and a racially homogeneous slave force. At the same time science and technology are producing more easily managed robots which likely will be able to replace humans to a very large extent. As only a limited number of humans will be needed to perform essentially menial tasks that matter will undoubtedly be solved in the manner of Huxley’s Brave New World.

To begin with it may be necessary to eliminate four or five billion people who are currently overburdening the planet. No problem. You think it won’t or can’t be done? Consider, in the eighteenth century an age old social order in Scotland was willfully scuttled. For centuries the Highlands had been structured along the lines of Lords and common retainers - essentially masters and slaves. Then in the eighteenth century the Lords discovered that now that there was peace with England there was more money in raising sheep than there was in maintaining human retainers. What to do with the human sheep of little monetary value? Run them out of the country breaking the trust of centuries.

The highlands were turned into sheepwalks while as the Americas were still new and thinly populated the retainers were driven off the land, to the coast, forced aboard ship and sent to Canada and the US.

A century earlier when the Irish were proving troublesome to the English, Cromwell, that great Puritan leader, rounded up tens of thousands and sold them as slaves in the West Indies. You heard right, sold as many Irish as possible in slavery where they worked cheek by jowl with the Negroes. Expect no mercy.

During the Irish famine of the eighteen-forties the English systematically removed all food stuffs forcing millions to emigrate to the Americas or starve to death. You are foolish if you believe not only that such things can’t happen again but even that they aren’t happening now. What do you think is going on?

An entire generation is being educated for slavery in our schools now and that is the only education they’re getting. It takes a village to enforce slavery; it takes a family to rear free men.

Awake! You are expendable. Take action while you still can.

It Takes A Village...? Part One

It Takes A Village…?

Part One

by

R.E. Prindle

Hillary Clinton

Among the great Communist ideas for transforming society is communal upbringing of children. Supposedly a loving family environment is dangerous to society as it inculcates individual ideas. The Red propagandists led by their beauteous cheer leader Mrs. Clinton counter with “It takes a village to raise a child.’ This is supposed to be a West African saying where one is led to believe that children are not parented but communalized.

As the West Africans have discovered this ideal solution to child rearing it may pay to examine the ideal society that this ideal method has produced.

In the first place there are numerous West African legends concerning social and political organization having been brought to them by legendary White people; that is that sometime in the last millennium shipwrecked sailors landed on the African coast where they tutored the Africans in the rudiments of social living. Rudiments is the key word here.

Prior to the Whites obviously destroying their even more tribal or perhaps even more dissociated living, I mean they might have been real cavemen, Africa must have been totally perfect although without any of the comforts we poor irrational Whites have come not only to expect but demand. And of course the poor Africans corrupted by White comforts have moved further and further from their primitive perfection.

Back then, and I stress, back then, when whole villages reared the village children while parents apparently counted for nothing but baby machines, West Africans had evolved the perfect social organization in which 30% had enslaved the remaining 70%. Such was the situation in the nineteenth century. This social arrangement of course solved the employment problem for the 30%, who perhaps preferred not to do the dirty work the 70% were compelled to do it will they, nil they. Of course, slavery was benign amongst these primitive people unlike the savage practices of more civilized peoples.

So these poor shmoes apparently devised a communal method of rearing the village’s, not the parent’s, offspring. Mrs. Clinton applauds them furiously. While this plan may or may not have reared a jolly lot of kids, beaming joyfully as they slaved in the fields, they remained too stupid to improve their lot doing little to advance creature comforts until the next wave of White people arrived, not to show them how this time, but just give the goods to the beaming children of a communal upbringing. No wonder they’re said to be laughing all the time.

And now this example of perfection is recommended to us by the Commuists as the ideal solution to our civilizational problems.

Unfortunately our Red savants seem intent on re-introducing slavery in support of such communal upbringing.. But shifting into an almost sci-fi mode lets look at the probable consequences of such perfection as imposed from above. Follow along in Part Two.

A Vote Of No Confidence

A Vote Of No Confidence

by

R.E. Prindle

While formal impeachment of the Obama Administration may be improbable if not impossible nevertheless the American people give Obama a vote of no confidence. It is unlikely if not impossible that Obama can make his administration beneficial for the American people. When Obama’s AG, Eric Holder, says that citizenship for illegal immigrants is their ‘civil right’ he obviously is working from a different agenda than the electorate.

Violence during the Obama administration has jumped and is increasing at an exponential rate. Negro violence since the advent of the administration has sky rocketed from individual attacks on buses and subways to mass paramilitary attacks on various institutions. Flash mobs organized by social media as only the Obamites have devised can make any street, any building, any store the object of an assault that materializes and dematerializes before your very eyes.

Mass shootings while not unknown pre-Obama have increased at an incredible rate and increasing magnitude. They seem to be linked by a common organizing mind. No matter how violent or destructive they may be Obama seems to respond with a ‘tut, tut, too bad but please show how civilized you are, no backlash permitted, learn to take your beating calmly.’ Thus an insane terrorist attack at the Boston Marathon where many were killed and scores maimed for life is dismissed as unfortunate while the US is not going to become barbaric by treating the Moslem perp as an enemy combatant, that he may or may not be an American citizen is irrelevant, he is ideologically an enemy of the people, instead he is to be given an expensive multi-million dollar show trial. Clearly the Obamites themselves are enemies of the people, we can have no confidence in them.

On the economic side the Beards led by their star spokesman Paul ‘Beard’ Krugman mutter economic nonsense as though they were savants. As Krugman has pointed out Obama is surrounded by Beard economic advisors heeding their rantings. After having exported American manufacturing leaving millions upon millions unemployed having given trillions to bankers as a stimulus the only stimulation has been to unemployment. The economic clown Beard Krugman in an effort to transfer even more trillions to his bloated cronies is now mocking us by suggesting that perhaps the problem of unemployment has been overlooked, poor bastards, but the solution is giving more ‘stimulus’ money to the Beards.

Judging from past results this should stimulate unemployment to even greater heights. Confidence in the Obama Administration? No, not possible. The Obamites have adequately demonstrated that they are enemies of the people committing egregious crimes against humanity. That goes for Krugman and his Bearded wonders also.

Dumb, Dumber And Dumbest: Three Not So Great Presidents

Dumb, Dumber And Dumbest;

Three Less Than Great Presidents

by

R.E. Prindle

Bill Clinton

A few decades ago I read an opinion in which the author stated that the US would fall apart once the last WWII generation president was succeeded by the boomer generation. I intuitively understood his prediction to be true. I was apprehensive then when Bill Clinton (b. 1946) was elected president in 1992. The apprehension was immediately justified and iterated. Without necessarily being in order Bill immediately requested blow jobs from his female interns: Under the desk and get to work Monica, faster, faster. Then had the crust to deny it.

When Bill heard that a religious fanatic from Waco going by the name of David Koresh was possibly having his way with some fourteen or fifteen year old underage girls, in a pique of jealousy Bill shouted ‘We’ve got to protect those girls from that pervert’, he knew whereof he spoke, and called out, unbelievable but true, the Army. Tanks rolled into Waco, (which thankfully was not named Prague or there would have been hell to pay) blasting away at the religious compound, setting it ablaze and incinerating those underage girls. Mission accomplished, shouted Bill, we saved those girls from molestation. Good job, Bill.

Pleased to show his statesmanship in the Waco instance, Bill then turned his attention to the former Yugoslavia, further from Washington even than Waco, where the Moslems were contesting the territory with the Christians. Having already shown his aversion to Christians Bill called out the armed forces once again to crush the Christians while bombing their country back into the stone age, thereby giving his blood thirsty lilith Secretary Of State Madeleine Albright the chance to buy into the privatized Postal System of newly liberated Kosovo. Madeleine apparently learned how profitable postal systems were from the US example.

Madeleine herself was only a nominal American, like us all an immigrant, having grown up in numerous other national cultures, unlike most of us.

When challenged about using the US military for essentially private ends Madeleine blustered: ‘What’s the good of having the most powerful military in the world if you don’t use it?’ Impeccable but expensive logic Madeleine but then you know how girls love to shop.

Thus while Bill is often referred to as our first Black president he was also our first Feminist and, People, could he ever pick ‘em. Remember Janet Reno?

One thing you can say about Bill is that he kept a stiff upper lip through it all as well as another member. Nothing fazed that boy. While he is alleged to have a huge IQ he seems to have been of low practical intelligence.

2.

George Bush

As proof that you can’t kill a dead horse the dumb Bill Clinton was succeeded by the even dumber George W. Bush (b. also in 1946). One is appalled by the dumbness of George and tempted to say it couldn’t get worse but…it did.

For some reasons Americans had no clue that their government’s intransigent position toward other peoples of the world wouldn’t have adverse consequences even as those consequences were happening. Good god, a couple three or four embassies were blown sky high and Clinton just shrugged them off. Madeleine Albright just said: What, me worry?

George had no sooner settled in than some Moslem invaders lifted a couple planes from the Boston airport and flew them fully loaded with jet fuel into New York City’s Twin Towers. What was George’s reaction to this devastation as he left the kindergarten class he was teaching to return to the White House? He said: This sucker is going down. No, no. Not yet. That’s what he said at the other end of his term after he had bankrupted the country.

Did he bankrupt the country? Well, he was the Great Decider, wasn’t he. Oh yea, as the towers plummeted into the subway George said: Oh, for Christ’s sake go shopping, buy something. Then in an inexplicable reaction he shut the country down lock, stock and barrel for something short of a week. All air flights were grounded and a hush fell over the country from that I can tell you. Of course, it bankrupted the airlines, but what the hell? TV networks ran for days without revenues.

Having seen dumb we were not witnessing dumber. The Bushes having had a generous hand in looting the Savings and Loans in the eighties, George now aimed for bigger game, Fanny Mae and the whole housing industry. A little more complicated then the Saving and Loan piracy, having given trillions of dollars in loans to people without money or income to nominally ‘buy’ houses and now that no mortgage payments were coming in and those non-existent mortgage payments having been bundled into insecure securities the bankers complained that they were likely to go broke. Nobody saw this coming. George asked the taxpayers for a trillion dollars to give to the bankers apparently feeling sorry for them. When Congress was reluctant to comply it was then George cried: If you don’t give it to me this sucker is going down. He didn’t care, of course, because his term was up and Dumber was passing the baton to Dumbest. Along came Barack. Zippity doo dah.

3.

Barack Obama

And now we come to the acme, the ne plus ultra of dumbness, the truly great Barack H. Obama (b. 1961, maybe) It’s not like we weren’t warned if we didn’t know already. The Reverend James David Manning of New York City warned, if you elect this man he will trash your country. Thank you Reverend Manning; Barry didn’t get my vote, not that that mattered.

Just after George had asked for a trillion for the bankers, Barack asked for another trillion for them although having learned from George’s example he didn’t say: Or else this sucker is going down. He didn’t have to; it went down anyway. But no complaints were registered from the banking quarter. Just from some gun totin’, bible thumping iggerunt hillbillies from the sticks who had to move their toilet back out doors because they could no longer pay the water bill. Though shit! Said Barry the Compassionate. And it was too.

The arrival of Barry was not all bad news. The murder rate has shot way up under Barry with some of the worst gun violence ever seen. Loughner, the Denver theatre shooting, the New Town Massacre and now the Boston Marathon Bombing. Guns, knives, bombs; what’s next the LSDing of the water supply. Ban all that stuff I say.

In emulation Of George of the Towers Boston was completely shut down for a day or two while the Army called in with armored vehicles spending tens of millions of dollars to track down one lone individual who apparently was holed up in a beached boat in some guys back yard with a bullet through the throat. A new high in hysteria.

People were warned to lock their doors and not come out no matter whether the house was on fire or not. So maybe a hundred million dollars was either spent or lost in business while the US Army and combined Boston area police forces worried about a 19 year old who must have been bleeding to death in some guys backyard with a bullet through his throat.

Dumb, Dumber and Dumbest have a lot in common.

Well, to mention all the peccadilloes of Barry the Iniquitous would be time consuming and outside the borders of this discussion so I’m going to have to close the borders of this inquiry and fence errant thoughts out, and all their kin too.

Actually Barry should have been fenced out. Poor frustrated Alan Keyes shouted at Barry when running for US Senator: You weren’t even born in the US. Barry who was a constitutional scholar shouted back: I’m not running for president; I’m running for the Senate, stupid.’ Alan knew better. So we got dumb, dumber and dumbest. Remember the wag who said the people get the president they deserve?

He said it, not me! Leave me alone.

　

Searching For Tara Browne

Searching For Tara Browne:

The Testimony Of Laurie O’ Leary

by

 

R.E. Prindle

 

Laurie O' Leary

O’ Leary, Laurie: Ronnie Kray: A Man Among Men, 2001, Headline Book Publishing

 

A key event in British rock and roll history was the death of Tara Browne on 12/18/66 in a car crash. The death was memorialized by the Beatles in their song A Day In The Life on the Sgt. Pepper’s album. This coincided with the Paul Is Dead rumor. It has been suggested, not very plausibly, that Paul McCartney died in the Browne crash and that after a little face lifting surgery Browne took his place in the band and subsequent career.

 

It has been said that on the night of the crash Paul challenged Tara to a race through the London streets that resulted in the crash. Rather thin story. Paul is supposed to have fled the scene of the accident. There is no doubt that there was an accident, and a spectacular one, and that presumably Browne died. I don’t think there can be much doubt that Tara Browne was the one who died but the accident does raise questions.

 

Browne along with the Beatles’ George Harrison was involved with the night club Sibylla’s that opened its doors on 6/26/66, six months previous to Tara’s demise. The club that attracted the cream of the rock world was extremely successful. The club was managed by Laurie O’ Leary. O’ Leary was already connected to the notorious Kray Twins having formerly managed aspects of the Krays’ West End gambling joint Esmeralda’s Barn. After Sibylla’s was closed to would move on the very important Speakeasy Club.

 

In his 2001 biography of Ronnie Kray, Laurie gives the most extended account of Sibylla’s that I have come across. While it may not solve any problems with Browne’s death, in its account the book does put Sibylla’s into perspective.

 

Laurie O’ Leary grew up in the East End not too far from the Krays. He was friends with them from early childhood maintaining a close relationship with them all through the years until Ronnie Kray’s death in the Broadmoor Mental Hospital (insane asylum, loony bin) in 1995.

 

While a ‘business’ associate he claims never to have been a member of the Krays’ criminal outfit, The Firm. O’ Leary was careful never to have become involved in overt criminal activities, although there was criminal involvement, instead becoming involved in the music business from the promotion and management side. It is not impossible that he participated in the negotiations of the Krays with Brian Epstein to take over the Beatles. As one writing of sensitive matters it isn’t so much what O’ Leary says as what he doesn’t tell us; so while we learn a great deal O’ Leary carefully conceals leads to the whole story.

 

The Krays, for whose who are unfamiliar with them, were twin brothers, Ronnie and Reggie, who were acknowledged as the kingpins of the British underworld during the 1960s. Their older brother, Charlie Kray, while not part of their Firm, participated in schemes and benefited from the relationship. Charlie Kray too, not surprisingly, got into show business management.

 

Originally from the East End the Krays made an entrance into the West End of London when by dubious means they acquired a Kensington gambling joint called Esmeralda’s Barn. This was a building of three floors of which the top floor was occupied by the gambling joint while the first floor was made into a private club and the basement was what in the US would be called a bar. O’ Leary managed the lower two floors. The Kray’s were reluctant to pay their taxes thus an un-understanding Inland Revenue closed their doors. Enter Sibylla’s.

 

O’ Leary says of this stage of his career: p.168

By this time I was managing the society club Sibylla’s for an elite group of directors that included Beatle George Harrison, Sir William Piggot-Brown, the top amateur jockey, and the evergreen disc jockey Alan (Fluff) Freeman.

The club attracted a high profile clientele, which was cleverly orchestrated by one of its directors Terry Howard who worked in advertising.

 

 

O’ Leary does not mention two other participants in the directorship Tara Browne and Kevin McDonald. These two are the only ones who figure in the commentary from the rock and roll side. Through O’ Leary, connected to both the Firm and the Charlie Kray Agency he contracted the talent for the club. We are beginning to see a closer connection between the rock scene and the Kray led underworld.

 

Now, you couldn’t run a club without ‘protection’ and the protection would have to have been provided by the Krays’ Firm as well as the talent by the Charlie Kray Agency and Kray associate O’ Leary.

 

Further, the location was on a Firm controlled street, flanked by gang controlled clubs. A question then would be, who selected the site and why? O’ Leary describes the location: pp 108-109

 

 Sibylla’s was a small restaurant discotheque situated in Mayfair’s Vine Street, a narrow, winding cobbled road suitable only for the width of one vehicle….

 

Entering from Regent Street, Vine Street already had three established night clubs. Al Burnet’s Stork Rooms was the most famous. Directly next door was the less famous but well-run Hirondelle. Both were used by the Twins. At the same time, a few doors along, was Bill Bentley’s Oyster Bar, which was frequented by many a celebrity….

 On the other side from Bentley’s was a rather infamous clip joint called Pipistrello’s…

 Just why the directors of Sibylla’s had chosen this site for their exclusive club was actually beyond belief. The other clubs were frequently used by London’s gangsters. This kind of passing trade would have been difficult to eliminate.

 

So, the high flying music trade was placed cheek by jowl with the London underworld. The whole directorship must have been high on drugs while feeling immune to any threat from the Kray gang. As I stated the club would have had to have been paying protection. Tara Browne already worked for and or was associated with a car dealership and the dealerships were all ‘protected’ by the Kray gang.

A month or so previous to Browne’s accident his friend and business associate Kevin McDonald fell to his death from a high building. Kevin was either carelessly walking the ledge, high enough to think he could fly, purposely jumped or was thrown to his death by unknown parties.

Concerning McDonald’s death O’ Leary says: p. 171

 

Sadly after about three weeks, news drifted through that Kevin McDonald had died. I was told to keep quiet about the tragedy, and that the news would finish off Sibylla’s. Nobody ever explained to me just what had happened to Kevin, of whom I had grown very fond. It appeared that he had leapt off a roof in, I think, Chelsea or Fulham while under the influence of something or other.

O’ Leary doesn’t indicate who told him to keep quiet or who failed to tell him what happened but I think the influence is clear that it was the Krays. Laurie doesn’t even mention Tara Browne’s death.

Perhaps, or probably, McDonald objected to some demands from the Krays while feeling beyond any threats because of the popularity of the Beatles through Harrison so that he ignored his danger. I suspect the situation was the same with Tara Browne who probably had a cognitive disconnect because of his social status.

Another jump would have been highly suspicious so an auto accident was determined. Possibly it was meant to only scare Tara but resulted in his death. If McCartney was used to lure Browne into a race through the streets then it is possible to create a scenario resulting in the Paul Is Dead rumor but, at this point it would be pure speculation.

At any rate O’ Leary’s account makes clear the Krays, both twins and Charlie, underworld connection to Sibylla’s, McDonald and Browne. It opens an avenue to further speculation.

　

Kray Twins



Gun Culture: The San Domingo Moment Take Two

Gun Culture:

The San Domingo Moment Take Two

by

R.E. Prindle

Overreaction or Stormtroopers?

I see something and I’m saying something.

Let’s create a scenario concerning guns over the last few months.

First: Homeland buys and distributes billions of rounds of ammunition and millions of automatic rifles and distributes them around the country.

Second: A stooge on lead-lease from a mental institution enters a grade and shoots it up killing CHILDREN.

Third: A hue and cry is raised to confiscate3 all guns which then leaves the White population defenseless.

Fourth: With the White population defenseless all those billions of rounds of ammunition and millions of automatic rifles are issued by Homeland Security to Negroes.

Eh, voila! The San Domingo Moment has returned. Whites are either enslaved or dead.

Was that a difficult exercise to figure out?

Not really.

Demographics And A Probable Future

Demographics And The Probable Future

by

R.E. Prindle

The time to view the US as a White country with minorities has passed.

While US figures indicate a White majority of from 60 to 72% if one looks at the actual distribution of the White majority it is restricted to non-urban areas.

When looking at urban numbers rather than countrywide percentages there are 40-45 million Negroes and +- 60 million Mexicans or Hispanics. Sixty million Hispanics is something like three New York States or California, Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Nevada combined. Presently the majority of Hispanics are illegals hence theoretically unable to vote so their legal political power is circumscribed. This could change rapidly.

So, in most cities Negroes are the majority population while Whites are a distant second. If one visits demographic sites one quickly realizes that Jews are an invisible presence in the census but a dominant presence culturally. Presumably they are included among Whites although in reality they are allies of Negroes and should be included in that demographic. Thus 5% should be subtracted from White stats and shifted to Negroes. In addition 20 to 30% of the White vote can be relied on to vote with the Negro Bloc as well as will all other ethnic blocs.

Thus it can be seen that Negroes while a much smaller countrywide percentage are actually in control of the majority of larger cities. Cities such as Detroit, Memphis, Birmingham, Atlanta and of course DC are either all Negro or close to it.

Thus while American cities are in Negro custody, US laws are fashioned to facilitate their takeover of the US. All laws are unconstitutionally designed to prevent White combination, that is in lawful assembly, either in offense or defense.

It seems that this situation has slipped under the radar unnoticed by any media.

If one looks closely one will find that for Whites the situation is much more dangerous, even desperate, than countrywide statistics would indicate. Suffice it to say the cities are lost and cannot be reclaimed peacefully. Whites are at the mercy of any legislation the Negro majority alliance wishes to pass, especially with the Federal government under Negro administration.

　

On Being White In A Black City

On Being White In A Negro City

by

R.E. Prindle

Philadelphia

There are certain demographic realities that have always to be borne in mind. One key US demographic is that there are between forty and forty-five million Negroes in the United States- many more than any but a few African countries. US numbers are the equivalent of say about fifteen Chicagoes, fifty Detroits. A realistic fact is that many cities must necessarily be majority or better Negro. Thus Detroit, Chicago, Birmingham, Atlanta and Philadelphia have either been or are being ethnically cleansed of Whites.

White law and Negro law are based on two different standards, they are not compatible. This is a fact that must not be ignored. As the US Attorney General Eric Holder says, Negroes are to be given legal precedence.

Now, in Philadelphia a newspaper recently published an article describing the actual White-Negro situation there. They also published the pictures of a couple dozen most wanted murderers in the Philly area, all of which were Negro with the exception of a couple Mexicans and an ‘Asian.’ There were no Whites in this most wanted category in a majority Negro city.

Nutter, the mayor of Philly, obviously Negro, is now calling for the disciplining of the publishers and authors, which may involve prison terms, because the publication dared to criticize Nutter’s administration and for failing to put more Whites on the murderer list than Negroes. Discrimination, he says. He calls this irresponsible journalism. He is quoted as writing:

While I fully recognize that constitutional protections afforded the press are intended to protect the media from censorship from the government, the First Amendment, like other constitutional rights, is not an unfettered right, and notwithstanding the First Amendment, a publisher has a duty, to the public to exercise its role in a responsible way. I ask the Commission to evaluate whether the “speech” employed in this essay is not the reckless equivalent of “shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater,” its prejudiced fact challenged generalizations an incitement to extreme reaction.

Apart from its egregious hypocrisy Nutter equates the publication of wanted murderers as crying Fire! in a crowed theater. Does it really matter whether the murderers were Black or White; weren’t they murderers? It does to Nutter who is a Negro running a Negro metropolis, obviously prejudiced. He is obviously at war with the White minority wishing to strip them of what have been universal constitutional rights.

Demographics are against the White residents of Philly. It is now functioning under Negro law that gives legal preference to negro notions. The message is clear. Ethnically cleanse Philly of Whites. Even the old Confederate capitol of Richmond is majority Negro. There are forty-five million Negroes in the US. They can easily appropriate fifty to a hundred cities unimpeded by the US laws that discriminate against Whites.

Think about it!

No defense is available against numbers. Use your feet, White people, get out of Philly. Move to the Northwest which is still predominantly White and when there ethnically cleanse it of Negroes. Make our own laws as the Negroes of Philly are making theirs. Negroes now have successfully appropriated the cities they need to create Negro paradises. Let them move to them en masse where they can live in ‘peace’ without White interference.

Demographically such appropriation cannot be resisted. But fair exchange is no crime. Live under White law or Negro law- take your choice.

Infinite Knowledge And The Finite Mind

Infinite Knowledge And The Finite Mind

by

R.E. Prindle

The world is fast approaching a very perilous situation. It is not a question of human perfidy but the unavoidable consequence of the accumulation of knowledge. While accumulated knowledge is growing exponentially the human mind is diminishing in capacity compounded by a concentration on the wrong things.

The ability to organize and manage the exploding quantity of knowledge exceeds the ability of the human mind to synthesize. The fraction of knowledge the ablest, the most capacious human minds can absorb is miniscule. The problem is compounded by our very inadequate educational system based on favoritism rather than merit. The level of the best is inexorably drawn down.

The problem of barely educating the most intelligent and mentally capable percentage of the population that amounts to no more than fifteen percent of the total within a reasonable time, say 30 years of age, is made difficult to impossible by the basic needs of the individual- maturation, sex, indolence, hazards such as drugs and alochol, mental fixations and illnesses and what have you.

As at least a full fifty percent of the population can be written off as totally incapable of abstract thinking, the remaining thirty-five percent is barely educable and trainable for ordinary tasks.

Even the most intelligent can be educated to only one discipline or a sub-set of a discipline. To be expert, for instance, in the study of proteins is to unfit the individual for most other technical or cultural subjects. Of course in becoming expert in one field does give one an operating method that can be used to transfer to or include another discipline but the effort takes time and dilutes the knowledge of both or more fields. The nature of memory is that it fades if not constantly used. This is unavoidable.

Human nature and envy being what it is the odds are that the most capable may not do well in the social battle while the much less capable are cunning at manipulating others to obtain their ends. Hence we have a politically able but intellectual dimwit serving as President of the United States, as well as, one might add, most other heads of State. They act from ideology rather than circumstances. It would appear that one of the least capable mentalities serving as head of State in North Korea is quite capable of bringing down the whole of civilization from its present precarious state.

There appears to be no solution to this problem. It is merely a bottleneck that the human race will not be able to pass through.

Bozos rule the world and will continue to do so. Hence, enjoy it while you can; it can’t matter. It has just gotten too complex for the human mind to manage.

I Wish I Was A Foreigner

This Poem was published c. 1900

 

I Wish I Was A Foreigner

by

An American

I wish I was a foreigner, I really, really do.

A right down foreign foreigner; pure foreigner through and through;

Because I find Americans, with all of native worth,

Don’t stand one half the chances here with men of foreign birth.

It seems to be unpopular for us to hold a place,

For we are made to give it up to men of foreign race.

The question of necessity and fitness to possess

Must never be considered- who cares for our distress.

Perhaps it is not wicked to be of foreign birth,

Or to mutter a mild protest when an alien wants the earth;

But the latest importation is sure to strike a job,

And be the sooner qualified to strike and lead a mob.

A Dutchman (German) or an Irishman, a Frenchman or a Turk

Comes here to be a voter, and is always given work;

A native born American is here, and here he must stay;

So it matters little how he lives, he cannot get away.

The Spaniard and Bohemian, the Russian and the Pole,

Are looking toward America with longings in the soul,

Because the politicians will receive them with open arms,

And the goddess of our freedom bid them welcome to her charms.

But the law abiding Chinaman from the Celestial shore,

Because he has no franchise, is driven from our shore;

Americans and Chinamen are not in much demand,

The one remains neglected while the other is barred the land.

So I wish I was a Dutchman, or some other foreign cuss

I’d lord it over the natives- who don’t dare to make a fuss,

But my blushes tell the story, I am native to the soil’

So the aliens hold the places- visitors must never toil.

    

Part IV: Mick Jagger, The Rolling Stones And The Yobbo Revolution

Mick Jagger, The Rolling Stones And The Yobbo Revolution

 

Part IV

by

R.E. Prindle

Mick, Kenneth Anger And Satan

1.

A Musical Digression

 

While this part deals with the rise of the occult it will require a digression or two to flesh out the argument to provide credibility.

Mark Sullivan, the author of the fabulous turn of the twentieth century study, Our Times, quotes Plato as observing that when a people’s music changes it signifies a great change of consciousness; the only question is, for what duration.

As Sullivan notes, the incoming waves of immigration to the US during the nineteenth century each brought its musical consciousness with it which was grafted onto American consciousness; thus the German, Polish, Italian and Irish musics etc. all had their influence. Sullivan was somewhat puzzled because with the huge Jewish influx he couldn’t find a commensurate Jewish music.

Sullivan failed to note that while the Jews had no national music of their own they were past adepts at mimicking the music of other nationalities; hence a large percentage of US music of other nationalities, Irish, Polish and German songs were actually written by Jews in the appropriate idiom. Jack Yellin for instant within ten years of his arrival was writing quintessential Southern songs such as ‘Are You From Dixie.’ A very high percentage of what is considered quintessential Americana has been penned by Jews thus infusing Jewish culture into and replacing American culture with their own.

While immigration was held to a minimum from 1914 to 1965 there was a huge internal migration of Negroes from the South to the North and West. The Jews served the same function with Negro music as they had with the external migrants. They wrote the songs for Negroes to sing. This was especially evident during the fifties and sixties of the twentieth century when the terms Negro and Jew became synonymous.

In the fifties when I was a boy Rock and Roll made its entry into musical history. From an elders’ point of view Rock and Roll was a corruption of our musical tastes that extended into our morality. This was as Plato and Sullivan predicted. The intense tough and decisive battles for supremacy in American culture were being fought between Communists and Americanists- Collectivism vs. Individualism. The decisive battle was the failure of Joe McCarthy. When McCarthy went down the war was lost although a long rear guard action delayed the Communist triumph that actually only took place in 2008 with the election of the Negro Barack Obama.

Thus the fifties was a long intense struggle that was fought out in the movies, phonograph records, publishing and radio with an increasing boot from television. While we knew we were fighting the Communists for survival the means of the warfare were noticed but by a few and they were demonized by the Communist controlled media as cranks. Most frequently the accusations were made by wild eyed hysterical sounding Fundamentalist ministers. As the majority couldn’t see the accusations that Fluoride and Rock and Roll were Communist plots the accusers were laughed off. I could never understand how something I loved, Rock and Roll, was a Communist plot.

I did note the accusation was uttered with such complete sincerity however that it troubled my mind over the decades as to how these ministers could make such an accusation. I suppose the first seeds of comprehension were planted by the Peter Sellers’ movie ’Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned To Love The Bomb And Stop Worrying.’ The movie while hilariously funny was so skewed toward the Communist cause that it gave me pause. I vaguely comprehended that I was being manipulated.

Shifting The Mores

Now, after something like sixty years of thought and study, including Plato and Sullivan, I have I believe the explanation.

The Mores of the US have probably always been relatively fluid. Almost from the beginning the mores of East Anglia clashed with those of Wessex and then came the Scots, the Rhineland Germans (known as the Pennsylvania Dutch), the Anglo-Scots of the Border Country, the Midland English Quakers and a smattering of others along with the strong Negro element.

After Independence the Negro population burgeoned when the invention of the cotton gin created the cotton culture of the South. This population would create the tension that led to the Civil War and from that conflict the tension that would lead to the post-WWII Negro revolt.

The Irish invasion of the 1840-60 period brought the great clash of mores between the Celts and Anglos that reached its head in the 1960 election of the Celt, John F. Kennedy.

Along with the Irish came the 48ers of that failed European revolutionary phase that would create the collective-individualist conflict in mores that has resulted in the Communist triumph of Barack Obama of today.

Then in the 1870s began the invasion of the Southern and Eastern Europeans that created a conflict in mores between themselves and the Irish, Anglo and Northern European element. As noted things settled down into a contest of moral wills until 1965 when the gates were thrown open to the entire world as though the fraction of the world’s surface designated the US could house all humanity. Thus any possible hope of a unity of mores was completely shattered. Any center that might have existed was destroyed.

Now, as unpleasant as the facts may be to some intelligences, the control of the creation of a unified set of mores was seized by the Jewish immigrants in the aftermath of WWI.

To merely select a highlight of the process, in 1938 the Stalinist-Jewish agent, Congressman Samuel Dickstein. with the complicity of FDR created the House Un-American Activities Committee to root out anti-Semites and Fascist/Nationalists thus shifting control of mores to the Judaeo-Communists. The move was only partially successful initially as it had to face an intense post-war reaction ultimately conducted by the near great Joseph McCarthy.

As ever the mores of the majority were attacked at the weak joints in their armor. The key point was the long festering Aryan-Negro conflict. In realistic terms it was a conflict that could have only two results, the physical subjugation or extermination of the Whites by the Blacks or vice versa or the amalgamation of the two species.

Like it or not, the Jews and Negroes are calling for the extermination of Whites. The problem in post-war 1946 was how a small minority of Jews and Negroes representing perhaps 14% of the population could eliminate the 86% who were fully armed and dangerous.

The first step would be to knock the majority off its moral center. Without a moral focal point the majority would flounder. The route taken was nothing new. Ever since post WWI when the newly formed Anti-Defamation and NAACP Leagues were formed the majority had been cast as bigots. This caused a polarization among its Liberal and Conservative elements and Immigrants and Natives. By 1950 there was a 50-50 split between descendents of pre-1800 and those who came after. These splits were exacerbated by propaganda. Outside those divisions were the Negroes.

So, then how to fracture and fragment the majority White population even further.

Until 1954 the music that you heard on the radio was all Western, not cowboy but derived from the White or Aryan population. And there wasn’t much of that music broadcast. Radio was controlled by the networks and they only slotted a couple hours a day of fairly wishy-washy stuff. Then about 1954 when television, commercially introduced after 1946, displaced radio as the source of home entertainment, radio floundered and only saved itself by going to all music that soon developed into Top 40 and teen dominance of the radio airwaves. That was my age cohort.

That was a time when the designation race music meant the stuff that only Negroes listened to. The designation Country and Western replaced the term Hillbilly at this time. Some considered Hillbilly a race music with a degree of accuracy if with malice. Hillbilly was despised by all but a minority not much larger than the Negroes of which I was one.

Strangely at about the same time efforts were made to bring both musics into the mainstream. Actually they would combine with folk to form Rock and Roll- Rhythm and Blues and Rockabilly. Hard to tell which was the harder sell.

H.L. Mencken in the teens and twenties had excoriated the hill people, from which I derive on my father’s side, while the vile Erskine Caldwell vilified and completely defamed Southern Whites in his two hateful and extremely popular novels Tobacco Road and God’s Little Acre. The two novels remained a tremendous influence through the fifties as well as the pervert Al Capp’s cartoon strip L’il Abner. Thus a large part of the majority population was more receptive to Negro music than Hillbilly.

Naturally the agents in the forcing of Negro music on the Aryans were the Jews. The actual recordings of real Negroes were pretty raw and unmusical. Though stuff to digest. Of course there had always been Negroes catering to White audiences such as Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong, Billie Holliday, the Ink Spots and Mills Brothers of the earlier generation and the great Platters, Fats Domino and Johnny Mathis of the next generation but the real Negro music was unmistakable.

Thus Jewish songwriters such as Leiber-Stoller, Doc Pomus, Mort Shuman and others adopted Negro personas and wrote most of the Rhythm and Blues performed by Negroes. It was this Negro music geared to Aryans by Jewish song writers with a foot in each camp that made the inroads leading up to Berry Gordy’s Motown Sound where you had a new generation of Negroes packaged exclusively for Aryans singing songs largely written by Negroes and, of course, from there it melded into the more racial Soul Music of the sixties.

So, in 1954 Rock and Roll began to develop. First was Bill Haley, the former leader of a Country band who picked up on some Negro/Jewish shouts like Shake, Rattle And Roll and moved them over to the White side of the tracks. And then came acceptable cuddly Negroes like Fats Domino and the respectable Bill Doggett with his great Honky Tonk Pts. I & II. I don’t know how Little Richard squeezed between Fats and The Platters but he did. Of course he wasn’t even of this planet and there was no discrimination toward extra-terrestrials.

Acts like James Brown And His Famous Flames were rejected out of hand. There were no crossover possibilities there. The greatest hit he ever made was his beloved televised funeral. That was something else.

The Chess artists that the Brits idolized made absolutely no impression at all with the exception of Chuck Berry. After Maybelline Chuck had tough sledding although he has fared reasonable well in the aftermath. Memphis, Tennessee, a true classic.

The Commies Were Everywhere

The Law Of Unintended Consequences

When the Fundamentalist ministers objected to Rock and Roll as a Communist plot I’m sure they were ignorant of the actual evolution of Rock so I am not clear on what their antennae were picking up. They may have been watching something that isn’t so obvious now.

The world of Folk Music was clearly Communist run with a very strong Jewish influence. While other people knew of the Red influence in the arch Commie group The Weavers, it was not at all obvious to kids like myself. The Weavers’ great hit On Top Of Old Smoky betrayed nothing that could be considered Communist. However the idea of Folk Music which I have always interpreted as Appalachian style music, essentially real oldtime hillbilly, was slowly expanded into a political notion of poor people’s music, the music of the ‘oppressed.’ Now, let me tell you, I come from this social group but have never considered myself ‘oppressed.’ That attitude comes from some very well situated people who have never been at the bottom. Seeger and his Almanac singers brought Depression songs into the mix so that ‘real’ people went around saying things like ‘I knowed it wan’t no good.’ Poor people with the folkies were always illiterates who ‘knowed’ things.

Seeger and the Weavers had a hit with the Israeli song Tzena, Tzena, Tzena that was a sprightly song but hardly folk. Apparently not realizing the song was a success because of its tune not its Jewishness the Weavers followed that song with some propaganda called The Song Of The Sabra, some kind of Israeli kibbutz song.

At that time the TV Hit Parade show was big and practically the only source of hit songs so Seeger got his song on as an extra because no one bought the record. It may have been the first Israel as the fifty-first state attempt. If so the reaction was completely negative. Shortly after, Seeger and The Weavers were investigated as Reds and disappeared.

Seeger became an anti-commercial purist but a major guru of the heavily Communist and Jewish New York folk scene of the late fifties and early sixties from whence the young Bob Dylan became a stellar performer. So, between the Negro race music and the Aryan Hillbilly race music along with the Folk music that became a part of the meld, Rock and Roll was sort of the unintended consequence of the effort to force Negro music on Aryans and the Red influence of Folk.

When Fred Hallerman of the Weavers became a consultant for the Kingston Trio in the late fifties revival of the Weaver ethic, the Kingstons did follow a Communist musical agenda that most folkies adopted. Once again, you had to have a score card to know the players and follow the game.

In England beginning around 1960 a funny thing happened on the way to the recording studio that the Judaeo-Communists could not have anticipated. The second generation of rockers worshipped Negroes and Negro American music especially the urban electric bluesmen of the fifties that White Americans had already rejected. It is true that the small coterie of American White Negroes were fanatical about Negro artists like Muddy Waters, John Lee Hooker, Chuck Berry, Bo Diddley and a few others but the mass market would have nothing to do with them either in the fifties or after thirty years of ballyhoo. The fanaticism was not contagious. Indeed a really nice picker like Mississippi John Hurt is unknown. You can count the number of records sold by the Blues hero Robert Johnson on one hand.

Yet the English rockers born from 1940 to 1944 literally worshipped these Negro guys, listening to their records until they had them note for note, even attempting to be Negro, chasing Negro women. Of course the music had to be adapted to the mass taste to succeed and in the adaptation a new, or at least different, style of music was created. As strange as it may seem both the Communist Jagger and Richards of the Rolling Stones had an attraction to American Country and Western while being reared on the Englishman, Scots actually, Lonnie Donegan’s big beat folk rock.

What came out of the Stones then was a strange Negro-Country and Western sound performed by White Negroes.

Thus Negro slave music despondent and defeated was successfully laid as the basis for the Folkways of a generation or two of Whites. Musically the revolutionary program was on course as the sixties dawned developing rapidly. The Fundamentalist ministers as it turns out were right about Rock and Roll being a Communist plot or turning into one.

Organizing The Future

Procol Harum In Full Sixties Gear

She wandered through the garden fence

And said I’ve brought at great expense

A potion guaranteed to bring

Relief from all your suffering.

And though I said: You don’t exist

She grasped me firmly by the wrist

And threw me down upon my back

And strapped me to her torture rack

And without further argument

I found my mind was all so bent

Upon a course so devious

It only made my torment worse.

--Procol Harum

The Communist strategy was to break up prevailing mores and replace them with its own. Thus the so-called concept of Critical Theory, which was Jewish, was used. Critical Theory is mostly taking a superior moral attitude as though one knew best and then carping at the existing society as though only fools had devised it and they could do better if they only had the chance. This attitude applies to all established standards and customs.

Key to our argument here is the assault on artistic standards. The Semitic religions of Judaism and Moslemism reject the representation of living life forms especially that the human relying on abstract designs instead. Thus Aryan representational art is anathema to them. More or less as the twentieth century began, coeval with the rise of Freudian psychology, the assault on representational art began.

In the US the assault began with the New York Armory show of 1913. The most sensational work of this seminal deconstructive exhibit was the Marcel DuChamp picture of The Nude Descending A Staircase, he, himself was a Communist agent. The process continued led by Jewish artists who formed a blobs and dabs ethic leading into Abstract Expressionism and finally completed by the anti-art of Andy Warhol in the early sixties.

In 1959 thirty-two short years after the American hero Charles Lindbergh flew his single engine prop airplane across the Atlantic over a period of days a four engine Jet 707 lifted from the runway of Idlewilde airport in New York City to cross the Atlantic non-stop to London in a few hours. This inaugurated the Jet Era while creating a new phenomenon, the Jet Set. Logistics had been made incomparably quicker and easier. Revolution could be co-ordinated as never before.

One imagines that David Bailey watching this first flight recognized its momentousness. I like to think his breath was taken away by this miracle of science and that he rushed down to get a ticket for the return flight to New York. Who was David Bailey? He was a young fashion photographer for British Vogue. Antonioni’s film Blow Up was based on his career in what would be known as Swinging London in a few years. Dave in his early twenties would catch the wave at its inception and ride the wave all the way up and all the way down. As I write he’s still out there.

As a result of the 707 Fashion itself was made identical on both sides of the Atlantic. New York and London became one huge metropolis for lucky Jet Setters. While Dave Bailey was in New York either this time or another time he met fellow revolutionary Andy Warhol. Andy was a fashion illustrator of shoes during the fifties so it is not improbable that someone at American Vogue called Andy to Dave’s attention. Or, perhaps as Dave was a switch hitter he wandered into the Serendipity where Andy was a fixture and formed an acquaintance there.

In any event in 1963 Dave Bailey took Mick Jagger on a 707 jet flight to New York. Mick, as we all know, was a revolutionary who at that time was attending the Communist London School of Economics while singing with the nascent Rolling Stones. Dave took Mick to call on Andy and the three became fast friends, mates as Dave would say. Mick revered Andy. Andy himself playing the fey fool for security became a very important figure in revolutionary circles until his death in 1987. Andy himself revered Marcel DuChamp while considering himself DuChamp’s disciple.

Just as Yoko Ono realized the potential of the Happenings for bending society to her will so did Andy. Having put the finishing touches to art, pop art would be followed by graffiti artists like Keith Haring and Basquiat, Andy turned to film. His atelier known as The Factory became a very long Happening from ‘64 to’67 when Andy was turned out of his quarters. After a hiatus of a decade the torch was picked up by the nightclub Studio 54 which in many ways was a continuation of The Factory as a social scene. Andy was no less a fixture at Studio 54 than he had been at his own Factory.

The Union of Jagger and Warhol was fortuitous as with Andy’s blessing the Stones became practically the Village house band. The Village was a stronghold for the Stones. Perhaps inspired by the success of the Stones as well as Bob Dylan Andy made a foray into music when he adopted the Velvet Underground as the Factory house band launching their very short career and the much longer one of Lou Reed.

The stage on which the ‘60s revolutionaries played out their gig was gradually falling into place as the unintended consequence of the foisting of Negro music on White youth by the Jews. As it turns out it was a Communist plot.

The Communist strategy was to break up prevailing mores and replace them with its own. This is an age old technique. No surprises here but to the uninformed. To mention only one example common to all religions, when a new religion is seeking to replace an old religion the simplest thing is to build new shrines on old sites. Thus a Christian church replaces a pagan shrine, then a Moslem mosque replaces the Christian church. The ‘Holy’ site remains the same but faith replaces faith.

Thus, the Communists made their assault on popular culture. Several very potent technologies had been developed by the ‘Capitalists’ that would never have come into existence under Communism, movies, TV, radio, records and print as well as the art world. They have used them all effectively. In authoritarian societies such as the USSR content could be strictly controlled and any deviants punished unlike the West with a long habit of freedom of expression. As the sixties progressed any attempt to control such things as pornography, nudity and actual sexual perversity were removed. By the end of the decade the cherished Holy Grail of the revolutionaries of being able to say ‘fuck’ in movies or on TV had been realized. The Warhol movies of Paul Morrissey, Blood For Dracula and Flesh For Frankenstein, carried the portrayal of Sado-Masochism to lengths that would have delighted De Sade and Sacher-Masoch themselves.

In an extreme pornographic Happening in 1971 Mick Jagger before an audience of millions would have a huge inflatable penis unroll from the back of the stage, which he mounted. If there was any community objection it was hooted down in the name of freedom of expression. Truly a cultural revolution of some sort had been achieved by a small minority.

Sussing Out The Ghouls

The key to the psychology of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries is Sigmund Freud and where he fits into the culture. Unfortunately he was not on the side of the angels. In the struggle between Reason and Un-reason Freud was the champion of un-reason, the Lord of Misrule. He aligned himself with ancient traditions, none of them Jewish as when they were formed there were no Jews, at the dawn of human history.

Freud discussed these ancient attitudes, in one guise or another, in his 1930 complaint Civilization And Its Discontents. To mention merely one strain, that of sex. While we cannot hope to recreate the mind of early man let us assume that early man took a cop from the nearest available woman where he found her. Rape was not yet a concept so for our purpose here, like Freud we’ll assume that forced sex was common and men, at least, suffered from no sexual repression. This is the very core of Freudian psychology.

Thus in the good old days a man in the mood who came across a woman drawing water at the spring simply grabbed the woman copped and strolled away without so much as a thank you. Nine months late the woman said a god appeared to her and the baby was his. Easy. But as populations evolved civilized new rules were introduced and men, at least, began to suffer the horrors of repressing their sexual appetites. This was very nearly original sin in Freud’s mind. Restrictions were placed on uninhibited copulation. However the memories of the good old days lived on and men subjected to the new discipline complained of their loss of rights.

At that point society thought something had to be done to satisfy these reactionaries. One possible solution was sacred prostitution. Thus young girls were taken down to the temple precincts and couldn’t leave until they offered themselves to the first taker.

In other instances girls stayed until they earned their dowries. In any event the illusion was created that any man could have any woman when he wanted her- if he had a shekel. If not then back to laboring in the vineyards of the Lord until he earned one.

Presumably this system worked reasonably well until the mores of the Matriarchy were replaced by the mores of the Patriarchy and women became private property with the woman secluded out sight of leering male eyes. This system had its problems, one being that some guys were so greedy for women that they collected hundreds in what they called a harem and said that these women were exclusively theirs. A neat turnaround of temple prostitution. Well, all systems have inherent flaws.

Middle Easterners then carried it so far that to prevent impertinent glances from passing fellow men they clothed their women cap-a-pie and then put a screen in front of their faces. Wow! That’s thorough.

As odd as it may seem those memories persisted for thousands of years perpetuated by cults and secret societies. In reaction to Catholic discipline societies such as the Free Spirits, the Anabaptists and such rebelled against the church in an attempt to re-establish that golden age of yore when it was supposed that men, at least, were unrepressed and could do as they pleased with any woman. As Rabelais phrased it: Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Law and Civilization go together so to get rid of one you have to get rid of the other. Freud wasn’t dumb.

Then the Enlightenment evolved and the Free Spirits morphed into the Libertines and the Libertines morphed into the Bohemians and Organized Crime and, et voila! Here we are. Today! Or at least New York City today. We’re getting closer to Andy and Mick’s paradise.

And then we have the problem of good and evil or, in other words, God and Satan. A lively division was carried on in ancient times that gradually evolved into Christian Orthodoxy and Gnostic heterodoxy. These went through additions and subtractions, mutation and changes until there gradually emerged a clarification of the Godly Church and the Satanic occult. The Church was able to successfully manage Satanism until the Enlightenment when with their power broken Satanism, Bohemianism and Organized Crime were able to surface and operate in the open.

Many were the advocates and cults. The central figure of Satanism was the Frenchman Eliphas Levy (French not Jewish, Levy was an assumed name). Levy organized modern Satanism. The novels of J.K. Huysmans give a good insight into this period as well as being good reading. Important to the US was the Golden Dawn of Aleister Crowley who managed to leave England and live and die in Los Angeles. His publishing house still survives in the desert town of Barstow.

Thus Satanism grew in significance into the twentieth century when it aligned itself with Warhol and popular music. When opportunity presents itself, snatch it.

Today, many self-styled adepts and magi have made their appearance over the decades usually with some sort of sex therapy that involves total indulgence or submersion in sexual congress. Thus the link between Satanism and Freudianism is strengthened. Freud himself has an appearance of a magus. He was steeped in the Jewish occult, Frankism, the Zohar, Kaballah and so forth. His answer to mental health was also unlimited sexual intercourse. He believed that the more ejaculations per day the better a man would be. Thus, once again, we have New York City of toady in which women are expected to indulge men in the most casual of sexual encounters. It will be remembered that the Jewish psycho-analysts fleeing the Third Reich mainly settled in New York thus once again strengthening the Freudian connection.

Thus the anger of ancient sexual reactionaries has been made the ‘sexual liberation’ of today. Sexual revolution? What sexual revolution? Just a return to the most primitive sexual indulgence.

As Freud was himself a homosexual it is no accident that he quietly promoted homosexuality or, at least, the end of sexual repression leading to…what appeared to be sexual liberation in his imagination.

Now, Mick Jagger first appeared in New York in 1963 with David Bailey as his cicerone just when all this fustian was about to ignite. A later fellow revolutionary future associate, Bob Fraser was working in New York, learning his craft, at the time so it is possible the Dave and Mick met him at that time. We don’t know as yet what all Bailey introduced Mick to. Kenneth Anger, the homosexual filmmaker and self styled magus and Black Magician from California was very influential not only in New York but in London as well. He would associate himself with the leading revolutionists such as Warhol, Jagger, Bailey, Lennon-Ono and the English art dealer Robert Fraser. Fraser spent the first few years of the sixties in New York learning the art trade while he mingled with Warhol and the NY pop artists. He was then to introduce their work to London.

Kenneth Anger made ‘experimental’ films such as the influential ‘Scorpio Rising’ the movie had a great influence on Andy when he turned to films in 1963. Scorpio Rising is a homosexual film about a gay primping to go out catting on his motorcycle in some Brando ‘Wild Ones’ setting. It is a silent film except for the girl group soundtrack of a dozen or so songs.

Anger would then insinuate himself into Jagger’s entourage as he tried to bring Jagger into his Satanic circle. Mick was supposed to write the sound track for an Anger film but didn’t produce causing Anger in revenge to claim the soundtrack was by Jagger then using some horrid static as a soundtrack. Anger would also con Jagger’s then girl friend, Marianne Faithfull, into appearing in what he considered his magnum opus Lucifer Rising. That movie was pretty much a waste which considering Anger’s other efforts is saying a great deal.

Nevertheless Anger influenced Jagger bringing Mick into the orbit of Satanic religion at least through the sixties. Satanic tropes also began to be marketed to the general public in the mid-sixties with dozens of Satanic movies released over the next decade. In much more than a symbolic way the birth of Satan, Lucifer rising, was for the modern age portrayed in the 1968 movie Rosemary’s Baby directed by the Jewish Roman Polansky based on the 1967 novel of the same name by the Jewish Ira Levin.

The movie purported to be filmed in New York’s legendary Dakota Apartment building, now condos. The movie would make the Dakota a Mecca for Satanists in the upcoming years. John Lennon and Yoko Ono would acquire three apartments in the Dakota in the seventies including two on the seventh floor on which Rosemary’s Baby took place.

Ono herself was a devotee of the Black Arts (black doesn’t mean Negro in this context nor in the term Black Magic) so that her move into the apartment building may have had deep meaning to her.

The previous year, 1967, the Stones had released their record Their Satanic Majesties Request in which Mick introduces himself as Satan. The disc was released on the eighth of December just before the birth of the baby Jesus. This might have been coincidental or it might have been a Jewish joke. At any rate the heavily Fundamentalist US audience of ‘kids’ took it literally thus identifying the ‘bad boy’ Stones as Satanists. The record also set a tone for the next few years.

According to sources such as Marianne Faithfull Mick was not seriously into Satanism however his movie Performance of 1968 goes a long way in reinforcing the impression that he was. So, within several months the Stones released their record, Jagger released his movie and Rosemary’s Baby appeared. These were dark years and growing darker and when ‘Satan’ appeared at Altamont the result was a foregone conclusion. It didn’t help subsequently when Mick mounted his giant inflated penis.

Nineteen sixty-eight and nine were tumultuous years in the record business as the industry moved from an entertainment backwater into a major billion dollar player. It was then that Mick and his fellow Stones realized that although their group was earning tens of millions of dollars very little of that money was coming their way. It could hardly escape them that while their ‘managers’ Eric Easton and Andrew Oldham showed evidence of big money they were still living hand to mouth. They sacked Oldham and Easton only to be tossed into the mouth of Leviathan, Allen Klein, by the departing Oldham.

Klein himself would manage to snag several major British groups including the two biggest, the Stones and the Beatles, any ogre’s dream. One imagines that he and his heirs have made hundreds of millions if not billions as a result of their thefts albeit conducted through legal methods.

It was not too long after the departure of Oldham and Easton that Jagger realized the monstrous trap that was Klein that Oldham had led the Stones into.

Actually the relationship of the goyish artists and their Jewish managers and record corporation execs is an interesting sociological and psychological study. I, of course, follow Freudian group theory from a Critical Theory perspective hence cannot be accused of anti-Semitism as Freud approached psychology from a scientific rather than a religious perspective himself being an atheist or so he said.

In Jewish thought they believe themselves to be Chosen of God hence occupying a position halfway between the godhead and humanity. As such they consider themselves as owners of the goyim or, in other words, human cattle. As the very Jewish Bob Dylan was to sing- Give me some milk or go home. Thus the Jewish personnel in the record industry consider the artists as something to be milked.

As with any cattle there are certain maintenance expenses that are unavoidable. It isn’t all profit. Thus of the billions milked from the British artists alone it is doubtful that the artists were allowed a penny on the dollar in compensation if that. The ‘milk’ obtained from the most fabulously successful act, the Beatles, is almost unbelievable. Both the Stones and the Beatles only amassed fortunes after they had freed themselves from their Jewish owners. Which is to say they buy their way out trailing mega dollars.

When Jagger realized the enormity of the criminality of Allen Klein he was desperate to escape his clutches. Interestingly he turned to another Jew, Prince Rupert Loewenstein, to free his group from the clutches of the other Jew, Klein.

When Klein took over the Stones from Oldham they were successful but not the icons they were fast becoming as the seventies neared. After freeing themselves from Klein the Stones went on to actually earn billions. Their concerts alone grossed over a billion dollars from 1971 to the present with another supposedly on the horizon that could possibly take in a quarter billion or more.

Now, it is nearly impossible for an artist to manage money period but money in the billions can only be managed by a competent financial staff. Rupert serves that function. Whether he is trustworthy remains to be seen; it’s not over until the fat lady sings. I do note that when Jerry Hall was divorcing Mick she thought it prudent to check with Rupert to see if her money was still there. Apparently she was aware of the financial shenanigans of money managers. Historically they can’t be trusted. One never knows whether the money is there until one asks for the check.

However whether Klein or Loewenstein, the management, the control, virtually the possession of those billions is in the hands of Jews while the Stones remain cattle to be milked. Give them some milk or go home.

One can only imagine the fear, the panic, that gripped Mick’s mind when he realized that all his and the Stones efforts of ten years had changed hands without any compensation. One can only imagine the horror with which he received the news that he and his fellows were penniless. One probably cannot imagine Mick’s reaction as Allen Klein told him- tough shit, so sue me.

Sue him the Stones did but operators like Klein know how to stonewall court orders while using accounting methods to conceal tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. The Stones sued for a mere seventeen million dollars while settling for bankruptcy returns of ten cents on the dollar. A little joke of Klein’s as he laughed merrily on the way to the bank. How much the Stones got of the settlement and how much their lawyers took has yet to be revealed.

Certainly Mick must have entered an extreme darkness of mind as he passed through the years from ‘67 to ‘71. Psychologically he had been emasculated by Easton, Oldham and Klein. One way to interpret his riding the inflatable penis could be as an attempt to regain the illusion of his manhood. One could also interpret his extreme effeminacy of this period as a result of his emasculation. Psychologically Klein had stolen his manhood along with his money. Not that Mick wasn’t always on the ambiguous side.

Mick’s association with Satanism then may have been prompted by his realization of just how evil life could be. Indeed in Manichean terms the flesh and world belong to Satan while God, the higher powers, deal in spirituality which is the rejection of Satan and his works I.e. money. Depending on what Mick was reading other than The Master And Margarita his mind may have been led to the conclusion that he was Rosemary’s Baby, that he was the Prince of Darkness. Certainly he seems to have realized the ambitions of Their Satanic Majesties Request and become a man of wealth and taste. Interestingly he seems able to move from the exquisite to clownish with the maximum of ease.

I hope the money’s there when he asks for the check rather than finding all those little milk bottles lined up on Rupert’s doorstep.