Monday, September 26, 2016


Attn:  Literature Fans

The Vampyres Of New York Vol. I

by

R.E. Prindle

 

I’m posting here the first volume of my novel Vampyres Of New York.  This is a slightly futuristic story.  It takes place in New York in 2018-19 after Obama snatched the presidency from the duly elected candidate, Donald Trump.  The story has a, I think, uniquely different love story between the protagonist Partly Wright and the lawyer, Angeline Gower. 

The eighty year old Partly Wright leaves home for New York City somewhat after the manner of the bunny rabbit gentlemen Uncle Wiggly who, it appears, is my major literary influence.  Strange, what?  First heard about him in kindergarten.

Read and enjoy.  Comments are welcome but try to make them editorial suggestions for me to consider.

I am beginning work on Volume 2, Across The Great Divide and if I live long enough the final volume of the trilogy, The Gotterdamerung will follow.

 




 


 



 


 


 


 

Sunday, September 25, 2016


A Beatles Fantasia:

John Lennon In Leather

By

R. E. Prindle

 


Dizzy Dez, a fellow Beatles researcher and internet friend, recently wrote a piece (  https://thenumbernineblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/22/taking-the-world-by-hurricane/     ) about the strange story of Rory Storm and the Hurricanes.  Rory Storm led the most popular Liverpool band of the period.  He was more important in Liverpool and Frankfurt than the Beatles.  Yet, as Diz points out, when all the shouting was over and the dust had settled, the Beatles went unto worldwide fame pulling the best of the Liverpool bands after them, Rory Storm was left out in the cold.  He never knew other than Liverpool success.

Just an inconsequential odd fact (except to Rory) that I found interesting but also significant.  It was good of Diz to dig this story up, but then, Diz left me with a thought:  What if the Beatles’ success had nothing to do with their talent; what if the only reason they found success was a fact that had nothing to do with their musical skills; what if their success depended on a queer’s fascination with one John Lennon?

Consider that Liverpool was an English backwater, a tough , gritty town with little sophistication and small hopes.  If you have ever been in the Liverpool/Bristol area you really know what depression is.  I was never so happy to leave an area since.  I had become acquainted with a bottom surpassing Philadelphia and that is saying a lot.

So, in 1960-62 what you had was a city full of louts, what the English call Yobboes, desperately trying to find some distinction for their lives by playing in rock bands.  In 1960 that was a desperate hope indeed.  The hope was so desperate that the bands ended up playing before a bunch of rowdies and prostitutes, the underbelly of civilization, in Hamburg’s red light district on the Reeperbahn.  Not the place for refined cultured manners.  More like changing you from a lout or Yobbo into a super Yobbo.  The indications are that the Beatles became very rough.   What the homosexuals call ‘rough trade.’

In any event the Beatles went to Hamburg where they refined their rock n’ roll skills coming back to Liverpool to take their place in the hierarchy of Liverpool bands where they were a sensation although lower in the hierarchy than Rory Storm and his Hurricanes.  Still in their locality and in their age and social set they were prominent.

Now, the local record store, NEMS, was managed for the family firm by a young homosexual Jew, Brian Epstein.  At the time it was a punishable offence to public morals to be a homosexual so Brian Epstein was quite repressed.  Raised on all the Jewish holocaust nonsense he felt like a powerless oppressed Jew.  Therefore as a homosexual Jew he favored the rough trade.

Probably having heard the Beatles talked about along their outrageous leader John Lennon, dressed all in black leather, Brian made it down to the local rock emporium, the Cavern, to have a look.

What he saw made his dick throb.  There on stage was God’s own Yobbo, John Lennon resplendent in his leather while projecting confidence and totally outrageous.  Rough trade on a stick.  Gimme dat ding.  So, totally smitten Brian has to figure out a way to realize his dream.

It is clear that Brian wasn’t on the make to find a band to promote; for Christ’s sake he had a city full of rock bands to choose from including Liverpool’s number one, Rory Storm and the Hurricanes and he made no effort to sign any.  But, suppose he heard of Lennon’s desire to be the toppermost of the poppermost.  Perhaps, Brian thought, I’m in the record business, I know execs at the London labels, perhaps if I gave John what he wants he would let me make him mine.  Sounded good.

Now, let’s be clear, when Brian approached the London labels there was no interest in the Beatles or any other Liverpool band.  There was no reason for any exec to ever even visit Liverpool and perhaps none ever had.  Regardless of any talent, that had not yet been demonstrated, the Beatles were not going anywhere.  The execs even considered the name stupid; what in the hell does beatle mean?  Can’t even spell it right.  Brian persisted and if he hadn’t the Beatles would never have had a shot at the bigtime.  They would have disappeared the way they came in, unnoticed.  The Beatles were going nowhere.

But, and this is the important fact here, Brian had a hard on for John.  Bear this in mind, Brian had a tin ear, he could have cared less about the Beatles as a band; he had a hard on for John. And hopefully by making John the toppermost of the poppermost, and this meant only the small market of England, it was inconceivable that any band, let alone an English band, could become a worldwide phenomenon.  Whatever happened next was totally serendipitous.  Who could have dreamed of worldwide fame and hundreds of millions of dollars.

So Brian signed his Boys, as they say in the managerial parlance, and left for London to put them in a recording contract.  Of course NEMS was a major account in the retail record world so Brian got a polite hearing but no real enthusiasm.  Probably to get rid of a pest who wouldn’t quit he was allowed an audition.  But this was only after making the rounds.

The Beatle’s ended up at EMI’s sub-label Parlophone and had George Martin assigned to them as a producer.  While the Beatles had been all the rage on the  Reeperbahn of ill fame and the backwater burg of Liverpool, what set the four aflame in those two locations was not so evident in the London recording studio.  It was like someone from Poughkeepsie showing up on the Great White Way.  George Martin found their musicianship flimsy but something apparently appealed to him about them.  Everything about them was off, they still had the aroma of the Reeperbahn,  but, the story goes, George was a technical wizard, so somewhat in the way David Seville created Alvin and the Chipmunks George’s wizardry created the Beatles.  This is the legend.

The label thought they were hopeless so perhaps as a joke they allowed the Beatles to make ‘I Want To Hold Your Hand’ as a first record.  And as with Alvin and the Chipmunks they probably viewed the disc as a novelty record; something along the lines of Mrs. Miller the off key virtuoso.

They were surprised when the record took off.  No less surprised than I was when the record was a success in the US.  Why the hell does anyone like that I wondered.  But I and we were witnessing several seemingly unrelated things:  First the song was the first true teenybopper, bubble gum song that soon inspired groups like the Ohio Express and the Lemon Pipers.  ‘Yummy, yummy, yummy, I’ve got love in my tummy.’  Remember that inspired tune?  A step up from, I Want To Hold Your Hand.

The social conditions were right for the Beatles innocent, probably tongue in cheek, song.  The Fifties had been tense what with the Cold War and the Bomb and things were getting more tense.  Nerves were frayed.  Perhaps a return to innocent pleasures of the young were in order.  At any rate after becoming the rage in England Brian had actually jockeyed the Beatles and John into the toppermost of the poppermost in that small sceptered island but after a terrific promo campaign in the US when their plane landed, they hit exactly the right insouciant note at the exact right psychological moment in time.  You can’t plan this.  Nobody, nobody, could have forecast that.  Brian and the Beatle’s ship had come in.

John Lennon had realized his dream in a Spade Royal Flush.  The Beatles, words fail me, were on top of the world.  The planet’s first globally successful band.  They were bigger than Jesus.  Oops, when John said that all hell broke loose.  Abashed, John announced they would tour no more.  When it came to business sense John was lacking but he and the band were only musicians, a ‘hot little band’ as McCartney recently characterized them.

But what about Brian?’  What about Brians’s reward.  He had little business sense too and hadn’t been working for the success that came or was prepared for it.  Of course John and the rest knew Brian was a poof.  Who didn’t except for those who chose not to see.  Brian had always been attentive to John in that peculiar way, certainly that hadn’t escaped he leader of the band.  He joked about how Brian and the whole record industry was Jewish and queer.

According to Peter Brown in his ‘The Love You Make:  An Insider’s Story Of The Beatles’, Brian did get his reward.  Brown says that Brian invited John on a holiday in Spain and there John gave him the reward he wanted.

What if the story of the Beatles success had nothing to do with their musicianship, their songwriting, their personalities or anything else but Brian Epstein getting a hard on  for a bit of rough trade:  John Lennon in leather.

Wouldn’t that make a fabulous movie?  Wouldn’t that be as ironical as all get out?  It might not be literally true but it can’t be too far from the truth.  Forget about poor old Rory Storm and the Hurricanes, history’s forgotten band.  Once again, what a movie.

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

George Soros Puts His Money Where His Mouth Is


George Soros

Puts His Money

Where His Mouth Is

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Check out the 9/20/16 Wall Street Journal for a great self-aggrandizing blurb by George Soros that George grandiloquently  titles:  Why I’m Investing $500 million dollars In migrants.  George apparently thinks this is such a charitable act that he doesn’t need any candles lit for his grand entrance into heaven. 

The WSJ highlights Georges bit with this quote:  I will invest in startups, established companies, social-impact initiatives, and businesses founded by migrants and refugees.

Not that he is donating, this is not a charitable gesture, he’s going to invest expecting one might think to at least double his money.  Heck, imagine if he found another Microsoft.  That would turn his money green.

So, put simply, without grandiosity, it’s nice to know that George has 500 million to invest.  Of course, who wouldn’t have half a billion to invest after looting the British treasury of billions.

Remember, one of George’s ‘social impact initiatives’ was the burning of Ferguson, the defamation of the police, and not a few deaths.  Now, that’s social impact.

There are other bigger social impact initiatives George is interested in such as what he calls ‘forced migration.’  As we all know George is Jewish and that Israel, the home of the Jews, is largely responsible for the war in Iraq that created this ‘forced migration’ and that migration is now directed and encouraged by Israeli agents to move ‘migrants’ out of the area especially to Europe.  Mama Merkel is believed to have taken a large bribe to allow a million edging toward two into Germany almost overnight.  Perhaps that is a social-impact initiative George is funding.

Gosh, you know, George is part of the supposed most intelligent race on earth with an awesome average IQ North of 110.  That’s brainy and I’ll bet George has a 160-200 IQ to help bring that average up.  That’s super smart.  Although it is only those Jews who have been in contact with Europeans for thousands of years who supposedly have that 110>,  Jews in contact with areas out of Europe only sport an 85 but they’re catching up fast, I’ll bet.

So, while George is spending all this money to raft sub-Saharan Africans across the Mediterranean one wonders why he doesn’t think to plunk that 500 million down in Lagos and organize a bunch of startups on those ‘forced migrants’ home turf where the people have their roots, memories and traditions.

As George says, (I) will seek investments in a variety of sectors, among them emerging digital technologies which seem especially promising as a way to provide solutions to the particular problems that dislocated people often face.

Nigeria?  Perfect for your more or less charitable efforts George.  Nigeria has it all.  Oil and tech and computer skills.  Gosh, they’ve made tens of millions soliciting people in the West by computer to help them get hundreds of millions of petro dollars out of Nigeria for investment in the West.

A little kick start like 500 million and we’ll have the Silicon River, opening jobs to tens of millions of Africans allowing them to stay home.  No more forced migration.  Why, a lot of African migrants to Europe and the US might even drift back to Africa in ‘unforced migration.’

Think about it George, you might not be looking at the problem from the right perspective.  Why force these people looking for a better life to move George when you can create a better life for them right there at home.  Tech and oil:  Think George.  Use that massive IQ.

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Moslems: Should We Use Our Head Or Should We Use Our Heart?


Moslems:

Should We Use Our Head

Or Should We Use Our Heart?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Ye Editor at the Wall Street Journal (9/17-18/16)  babbles on.  I have never considered the Journal a Conservative paper and now Ye Editor drops the façade and goes full buttoned up Liberal.

Ye Editor:  Thanks to the Obama Administration and Congressional Republicans, the GOP candidate now has a chance to show common sense on the matter of Muslims.

I suppose that’s code for saying a back door has been found to let in Moslems.  Sure enough.  Trump according to Ye Editor has ‘a chance to prove his policy is not anti-Muslim but anti-jihad.’  Ah, then we wrong to think all jihadists are Muslims.  I suppose then that as all jihadists are Moslems they wear identifying badges, because if they don’t….  Or one imagines that a Moslem who for a number of years hasn’t been a jihadist may one day wake up and say it is time he came out of the closet.  Perhaps Ye Editor thinks that jihadists are born that way.  Just another Moslem sect.

Oh, and sects.  There are a number of Moslem sects.  The Wahabis are supposed to be the most militant of all.  The Saudi WTC boys may well have been Wahabis as they were Saudis.  Would Ye Editor agree that Wahabis have the most potential to come out of the closet, supposing they are in the closet, and that therefore Wahabis should definitely be banned by Trump or, perhaps, even by Obama, that great and wise leader.

Does Ye Editor even know whether Obama has considered that problem?

And regional.  Do most jihadists come from certain regions?  Sunnis, Shiites?  Perhaps the US should be selective as to sect and region?  But, then, what if a Moslem lies about his sect or region?  Bigoted to think a Moslem might lie?  Well, the Koran, the Moslem guide book and holy script says it’s perfectly A-OK to lie to the Nasranis.  US personnel are most likely to be Nasranis so putting the question would be useless.

I’m sure common sense comes in here somewhere.  Maybe, just maybe, Trump is exhibiting common sense when he says he will ban all Moslems.   I think he is.  Common sense is good but it is not the ultimate test.  Don’t education and intelligence work in there too?  I sure hope so.  Perhaps thought I’m all head and no heart while Ye Editor is the latter and not the former.  Well, Ye Editor, it is common sense to not screw yourself.  Letting in Moslems is screwing yourself but then, I guess you’re comfortable with that.

 

Trump:  Do not let these geeks back you off from your original stand concerning Moslems.  When you’re right you’re right.

Monday, September 12, 2016

God Bless America


God Bless America

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Now is the time for all good people to come to the aid of their party.

 

As Woody Guthrie wrote in his immortal song:  This land is your land, this land is my land…  , and by extension, this land is our land.  This land is our home.

This election year will prove whose land it really is, our land or the land of roving transients from the four corners of the earth.  Renegade, so-called Americans of the Liberal Party, wish to transform our land into a land of indeterminate form, people and culture. 

Our culture, our hopes, our dreams are to be discarded, subsumed into what they call multi-culturalism.  One doesn’t have to be a genius to see that multi-culturalism is a transient condition; it will slowly evolve into a uniform culture.  The Liberals wish to discard our long and worthy culture in favor of whatever may be. 

This election will prove whether we can maintain a strong position, imposing our culture of being stripped of it.  It is an either or situation.  The schools must be reclaimed for our culture.  Of course there will be melding, that is an inevitable consequence of mixing cultures but our mores, our culture, our traditions must remain supreme.

Of course the Liberals have an arsenal of names to denigrate us:  racists, anti-Semites, homophobes, Islamaphobes, Basket Of Retards, but a laugh and a wave of the hand dismisses those defamations.

We must seize the moment.  As Irving Berlin wrote in his immortal hymn of 1940 when our culture then seemed doomed: God bless America, land that I love, stand beside her and guide her…. Yes, stand up and stand beside your land, your hopes and dreams, and guide her to a safe harbor.

Now is the hour to take our stand.  The hour will pass and won’t come again.  Carpe Diem: Seize the moment.  Get a basket of your friends together make sure you vote in November.  Make sure you vote Trump.  The Trump Party is the only and last chance.  Don’t fail your children and grand-children, vote, and vote Trump.  The future depends on you.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Obama Defends Kaepernick


Obama Defends Kaepernick’s Protest

By

R.E. Prindle

 


 

President Obama said Monday that NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick was “exercising his constitutional right: to bring attention to racial injustice by not taking part in the national anthem…

 

…Obama said he did not doubt Kaepernick’s sincerity to highlighting social issues and noted the player was the latest in a long line of professional sports figures to do so.  The president also acknowledged that Kaepernick’s  silent protest was a “tough thing” for many members of the military to accept.

 

“When it comes to the flag and the national anthem and the meaning that holds for our men and women in uniform and those who fought for us—that is a tough thing for them to get past.”  Obama said.  “but I don’t doubt his sincerity.  I think he cares about some real, legitimate issues that have to be talked about.  If nothing else, he’s generated more conversation about issues that have to be talked about.”

 

Our great Constitutional scholar has spoken.  He says that there is a Constitutional right to bring attention to a racial matter.  I don’t know what Barry was smoking or snorting but it’s not clear to me where he read there is a right to bring attention to any problem.  In fact I don’t see a Constitutional question involved at all.  Barry has invoked a right too far.

What we do have is the broader question of respect for others  (frequently invoked as ‘offensive’) and following established mores.  People don’t talk much about mores anymore but what is occurring now is an assault on mores to exchange established mores for more race based mores.  Kaepernick launched an all out attack for Negro Supremacy by discarding mores followed by American citizens for a replacement of those mores by new Negro mores.  Mores govern how a society functions.

For those with an ear to the ground, finger on the pulse and an eye for flashing changes being imposed on Americans by this traitorous president what is being attempted is clear.  The Negro is rejecting White mores and the unpleasant past of slavery.  Negro Revolutionaries form an entirely different set that displaces American mores.  Thus disrespecting the flag that represents slavery and Jim Crow to them.  Photos of revolutionaries of any color standing on the Flag or burning it is not so much disrespect for the Flag as a rejection of what Negroes think it stands for.  There is no more outstanding image of the move to replace what some call ‘the historic American nation’.  That nation, weird old America, and what they call White Supremacy is anathema to them. 

If you’re really listening to the rhetoric, following the photo images this should require no explanation.  What more do you need to see this clearly than the hate law that the coloreds and their ally passed making White heterosexual males second class citizens?  I am amazed that there is no outcry against this.  My voice is a solo coming from the wilderness.

Boy Obama himself shares this disrespect and hatred of White Americans.  Just listen to the precedence he gives to the grumbling of this privileged multi-millionaire athlete over ‘those who fought for us.’

When it comes to the flag and the national anthem and the meaning it holds for our men and women in uniform and those who fought for it—that is a tough thing for them to get past, but I don’t doubt (Kaepernick’s) sincerity.
Do you see the arrogance, hear the sneer of this nit picked off the streets of New York City, given a law degree from Harvard and pushed into the White House without a single qualification?  He says to the returned vets of Viet Nam, that dirty little war, not all returned, tens of thousand of their spirits haunt Nam, says to them and their surviving brothers: Fuck y’all.  Get over it.  Why?  Because he doesn’t doubt Kaepernick’s sincerity.  He doesn’t doubt his sincerity!

And this arrogant buffoon, Barry Obama, places a football player’s sincerity over the sacrifice of a million or more men who put their bodies and sanity into the jungles and swamps of an ungrateful Viet Nam.

If you voted for him, shame on you.  If you voted for him twice (two different elections) you should bury your head in the sand and leave it there.  If you intend to vote for his surrogate, Hitler Clinton this time around you will have to do penance.

If anything Obama has shown how easy it is to change the mores of a whole nation, however such rapid change makes them more fluid and even easier to direct the flow.  For us it is to reject Obama’s mores and direct the flow into a better and more reasonable channel.  Our Lives Matter.  To do so requires the rejection of Liberal and Negro influence and their marginalization.  As unpleasant as that task may be to our mores it must be taken up.  Contempt for Obama is rising; it must be amplified.

As Obama himself says: ‘I’d rather have…people who are engaged in the argument and trying to think through how they can be part of our democratic process than people who are just sitting on the sidelines not paying attention at all.’   President Obama, you have found us.

Heil Obama!  We are paying attention.  Take up our arms, we’re marching again. Our democracy will be established with liberty and justice for all not just the Liberal few.  Re-enfranchise the White heterosexual male – down with hate laws. 

Vote Trump

Sunday, September 4, 2016

Opening A Case For The Reexamination Of The History Of The Twenties And Thirties


Opening A Case For The Reexamination

Of The History Of The Twenties And Thirties

by

R.E. Prindle

 

No period of US history, or world history for that matter, is more misunderstood than the nineteen twenties and thirties.  Some reevaluation is beginning to appear but much remains to be done.

In the following two essays I attempt a more accurate understanding of the squabble between the Jews and Henry Ford. You may be shocked, yes, shocked to find that Ford was not in the wrong nor was he an anti-Semitic demon.  This is really interesting stuff.

 


 


 


 


 


 

 


 


 

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Listen To Donald Trump; Your Life Depends On It


Listen To Donald Trump: Your Life Depends On It

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Since Trump began being briefed for the presidency, no matter how badly, the tenor of his speeches has changed dramatically.  Perhaps the FBI has disclosed their private information on the machinations of Obama that they were unable to disclose under Obama’s thumb.

When Trump now announced that Obama has strategically placed one hundred thousand Mexican paramilitaries (Trump doesn’t use this term) he, Trump, says that he will as his first move arrest the whole lot.  My impression is that this accusation is very, very serious.  As Trump says, you, we, are not bigots, we are good people and as such have every right to protect our lives, our loved ones lives and our children’s lives.

You may be sure that many Moslem communities as well have been strategically placed so that on the signal all will rise as one.  Knowing the danger of predicting the event it is in all likelihood very close, perhaps on the eve of the election or alternatively the eve of Trump’s inauguration.  Remember that Obama has categorically said that Trump will not be president; take him at his word.

It behooves you to listen to what Trump is saying; he is telling you something, as much as he dares.

Despite what you may have been led to believe Trump is an honest candidate.  He cares for the United States and its survival.  Put your prejudice behind you, discard all the slander of the MSM, Hillary and the administration.  You have been taken.  Put your support behind Trump now.  He is putting his life on the line for you and for our country.  Make no mistake the next four three months will be the most critical the country has ever experienced.

Evil times await you if you don’t support Trump.  The abyss yawns.

Saturday, August 20, 2016

The Birth Of Two Nations


The Birth Of Two Nations

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In 1915 D.W. Griffith and Thomas Dixon Jr. released what is perhaps the most famous movie, silent or talkie, ever made.  The movie that depicts the aftermath of the Civil War, that is Reconstruction, was the biggest spectacle ever produced to that time, and also the highest grosser. 

The movie was addressed to the North.  For the North the Civil War was a war of extermination intended to kill all the White Southerners.  That they didn’t succeed is a mere accident of history.  For instance, read War Crimes Against Southern Civilians by Walter Brian Cisco.  After a hundred and fifty years later Southerners finally feel free to tell the truth.  The book will help you understand Griffith’s Birth of a Nation. 

Thus the nation Griffith and Dixon referred to was the unity of the Aryan Nation.  The Birth was its hoped for reunification after the horrors of the Civil War.  The plea was never to kill each other again; especially avoiding the genocidal horrors of Generals William Tecumseh Sherman and Phil Sheridan among many other Northern commanders.

Naturally the movie was seen as racial and racist and a great hue and cry was raised by Negroes and Jews but not by the men who fought the war either North or South.  While the movie in many cases was viewed by participants and survivors of that great conflict, and thought to accurately represent the situation a barrage of defamation was directed at D.W. Griffith, the director, and Thomas Dixon, the writer.

Dixon who was a best selling author of talent and a good story teller was gradually turned into a racist monster having no place in American literature or culture.  Both he and Griffith’s careers began a precipitous decline following the movie and both died penniless and in obscurity.

Now, a hundred years later in an effort to co-opt history a new film also titled Birth of a Nation has been written, directed and acted by Nate Parker.  Nate is a Negro.  His film deals with a slave uprising led by Nat Turner in Southhampton County, Virginia in 1831.  The rebellion was a murderous, bloody, rapefest that ended as it must have once the surprise was over and the Whites organized.  But, what is meant by Nate Parker’s filming the movie?  Is it merely to mock Griffith and Dixon or is he calling for a unification of the present Negroes to exterminate present Whites?   In other words, a serious call for the birth of a Negro United States or Nation?  The film certainly excites the Negro people to do battle with the White Demons.  And that at a time when the Negroes are already working themselves into a lather finding excuses to kill, burn and loot.

The very people who denounce Griffith and Dixon now applaud Parker as the auteur of a fantastic picture.  They little know that they are the projected victims of the film. 

However Nate Parker has complicated the matter by having been tried for raping a White girl in college, sort of following Griffith and Dixon’s script that was denounced as defamatory.    The White girl is described as being unconscious, thus one imagines drugged, hence unable to give consent as Parker claims while having gratified his hatred of Whites on the girl’s body.  Having gratified his hatred Parker invited his Black roommate into the room to have some too. So we have a gang rape.

So the Griffith film in which a Negro gratifies his lust on a White girl seems to have been reenacted by Parker even though the scene in Griffith’s film was called inaccurate and racist.

Parker, of course, represenst his rape of the girl as a mere youthful indiscretion and he’s put all that behind him; convenient for him although his victim subsequently committed suicide at the age of thirty.  Collateral damage.   So let’s forget about the mistake and concentrate on Parker’s movie that calls for lots more murder and rape.

Let’s try to place Parker and his movie into a historical continuum.  The Nat Turner uprising occurred in South Hampton County, Virginia in 1831 as noted.  The uprising was not too far distant in time from the 1804 revolt of Toussaint L’Ouverture in Haiti which established the independence of Haiti from the French.  Haiti was a major event in the consciousness of nineteenth century history.  While Toussaint did not in any sense defeat Napoleon as some historians claim he did defeat troops of the Empire.  The reaction among Whites was stupendous.  Some feared an uprising in the US like that of Nat Turner other lauded Toussaint as the greatest military figure of all time surpassing Washington, Napoleon, Caesar and whoever.  Just the greatest and that because he was a Negro.  Matthew Clavin in his fine book Toussaint L’Ouverture and the American Civil War details the reaction to Toussaint’s victory.  All the White men were massacred while the White women were given the choice of a horrible death or marriage to Negroes, but a real marriage not a mockery of one.  Most women chose to submit to the Negroes.

The Whites not murdered during the Haitian Revolution fled to the nascent United States.  While France had sold Louisiana to the US in 1803 New Orleans was still considered a French colony to which many of the slave owners repaired bringing their slaves with them.  Many of the slave owners were mulattoes and Negroes thus New Orleans had a large corps of Negro slave owners at the time of the Civil War.

Others landed along the Gulf Coast so news of Haiti was general in the South among both slave owners and slaves.  This Haitian rebellion then both incited Nat Turner and terrified the Whites.  So, the result was murder, theft and rapine what it would seem Nate Parker is inciting with his movie.  As far as rape goes he knows what he’s talking about.

Efforts are being made to prevent the theater release in October, not only by Whites but by Negroes also.  This would seem wise.  In the event of a Negro uprising that could occur before election time or at least inauguration that might seem to justify martial law and the continuation of Obama rule.  Some worry about this and their worries may be justified.  We’ll see.  I fear that the US is now two nations and not one.

Vote Trump anyway.

Thursday, August 18, 2016

Does Trump Miss The Point On Tech Visas?


Does Trump Miss The Point

On Tech Visas?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

There are apparently many jobs Americans won’t do.  One is obviously the very high paying job of CEO of IT companies which seem to be headed by Hindus.  While Americans were quite capable of inventing computers, the internet and all the IT accoutrements they are incapable of managing that which they have invented.  At least until recently.  The personnel of talent now come from outside the US which is incapable of producing anything other than dummies, at least of the male variety.  Sometime in the recent past White males lost the ability to function but fortunately women and people of color are here to pick up the slack.

The country of choice for choosing the CEOs seems to be India.  The Hindu mind that produced virtually nothing for the last three thousand years or so seems to be ideally suited to the computer sciences.  So much so that Americans adequately performing tech jobs are now being fired, one presumes for incompetence to be replaced by Hindus or others who have surpassed White people in intelligence while in many cases according to Jason Riley are even paid more than the American morons they replace thus actually raising costs to their companies.  One marvels that such super intellects have been hiding in India unused lo these many millennia.  It took American genius to discover them in their lairs, give them a shave and new suit of clothes and get them on the job.

Mr. Riley writing in the venerable Wall Street Journal (8/17/16) gives us his thoughts in a piece he titles:  Trump Misses the Point on Tech Visas.  Obviously the President of the United States may be one of those jobs Americans won’t do along with picking grapes and basic construction.  Indeed, our current Negro president was chosen because his skin isn’t White.  While most Americans believe he has done a poor job, his signature legislation Obamacare is heading toward bankruptcy,  the people in charge are convinced he has been the greatest president ever.  Perspective is obviously involved.

Mr. Riley who is a senior fellow at something called Manhattan Institute is also a WSJ contributor.  Those should be stellar credentials but Mr. Riley, perhaps a little too senior, is difficult to follow.

In yesterday’s times these H1B immigrants would have been called wage busters or scabs.  While there are several instances of importing these workers to displace an already existing work force Mr. Riley chose for his illustration the Disney Co. of Orlando.  Disney World is appropriately a fantasy world. 

Choosing his words carefully Mr. Riley says that 250 American Disney tech workers were ‘furloughed’ to be replaced by 250 H1B workers while Mr. Riley doesn’t say from where a good guess would be that they are Hindus from India.  Now, the word furlough means a leave of absence, applied especially to the military.  Those 250 American workers were not furloughed, they were fired.  They aren’t coming back while they were compelled to train their replacements.  Mr. Riley glosses over this truth to avoid the obvious.  The ability to do this is why he works for a ‘think tank.’

He explains further making even less sense:  Something called the National Foundation for American Policy released a study, by whom and of what quality isn’t mentioned, but according to the study “Companies are not replacing long time employees with new workers doing the exact same jobs but rather replacing the employees with new systems in an attempt to perform the function in a more efficient way.’  In other words, these Hindus are far superior workers than the Americans.

Let us hope for Disney’s sake the attempt is successful.  We are not informed who devised the new more efficient systems, one would be surprised they could have been inefficient Americans, whether from domestic or ‘outsourced’ sources but what is clear is that 250 Hindus replaced 250 American workers who apparently were too stupid to be retrained to the new more efficient system.

What is interesting here is that Disney accepted 250 employees sight unseen.  They did not vett them themselves.  Mr. Riley explains:

In reality [interesting word to use in the Disney fantasyland] hiring a contractor is often done through a competitive bidding process and the company doesn’t know beforehand whether or to what extent the winning bid will use H1B visa holders.


Competitive bidding?  Mr. Riley doesn’t say on what basis the competition was defined but in business it is usually for the lowest possible price.  The only reasonable conclusion is that in the bidding by various agencies it is to provide 250 qualified workers who will accept the lowest possible wage.  But no, Mr. Riley say this is an unreasonable assumption.

US employers turn to high-skill immigrants for the same reason they turn to low skill immigrants… [that is the lowest possible wage] out of necessity.  Foreign nationals who tend [they tend?] to be either more skilled or less skilled than the typical US worker.


So essentially Disney is getting a pig in a poke; 250 workers who may be more skilled or less skilled than the workers they are replacing, hence no gain in efficiency under any system, new or old.  But they are replacing ‘typical’ American workers.  (Perhaps at this point one can see Donald Trump scratching his head because he probably doesn’t understand.)  ‘Typical’ seems confusing in any case.  Obviously American universities have found Americans too stupid to teach because more than 70% of full time graduate students in electrical engineering and computer sciences of American universities are international students says Mr. Riley.  Over the past three decades, college-degree holders outside the US have more than doubled while the US share of those with college degrees has declined by 30%.  Has anyone asked why American college degree holders have declined?  It would seem something to look into, don’t you think?    It would seem that something is going on.  Discrimination?

I have trouble making any sense of Mr. Riley’s article and I’m not sure Mr. Riley is able to either.  Certainly while Mr. Riley claims that Trump misses the point on tech visas nowhere in his article does he show reasons of Trump’s ignorance.  After reading this article I doubt if Mr. Trump is any more enlightened.

The Wall Street Journal should be ashamed to print such incompetent articles as Mr. Riley’s.  Of course Mr. Riley is an inefficient American brain worker who should, perhaps be replaced by a foreign worker using a new more efficient system.

I’m still voting Trump who, by my standards, has a better grasp on the nature of the problem’s facing us.