Peggy Noonan And Alabama Women

Peggy Noonan And Alabama Women

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Peggy Noonan came up with an interesting essay in the Wall Street Journal of 11/18-19/17 concerning the sexual issue, specifically concerning Alabama’s Roy Moore, who, as far as I can tell, committed no crimes .

Ever sensitive about Republican sexual peccadilloes the Democratic perverts are forcing Moore to undergo a second confirmatory election to give the Democrats another shot at defeating him.  Good god, how they wish they could have forced Trump into a second confirmatory to give Hilary a second chance of winning and how they would have been driven committable had he won.  Not as bad thing actually as we would have been relieved of the whole miserable lot.

I don’t know that Doug Jones, chosen to run against Moore, has been sexually vetted to insure he is clean, but in any event Peg approvingly quotes Jones:  I’m not in favor of anything that is going to infringe on a woman’s right and freedom to choose.

This is a live issue with certain women: they insist that they choose what they do with their body.  Yes, indeed, but this has societal and legal ramifications with real consequences.

The first issue is when is a woman a woman?  At the time Jerry Lee Lewis was pushed down in the mire for marrying his 13 year old cousin it was legal in his home State; he was completely within the law and his and his wife’s rights.  She should have been free to do with her body as she wished.  Nevertheless Jerry Lee was literally crucified.

Recent laws have pushed statutory rape to the age of eighteen.  Any male who has sexual relations with a sub-eighteen, even by a day, sub-eighteen himself or not is guilty of statutory rape.

At the same time in girls’ or women’s terms any girl still a virgin past sixteen is a retard.  There’s a conflict there isn’t there?  Who is going to deflower the women and yet with few exceptions every girl of sixteen has been deflowered?  Still, women say that it is every woman’s right to do with her body as she wishes.

Let us assume then that a girl becomes a woman at fourteen when her womanly attributes become obvious and she knows it and struts her stuff.  So, the law forbids a woman to function as a woman for four long years when her hormones are driving her crazy.

And this raises the question of prostitution.  If a woman can dispose of her body as she wishes then she has the right to sell her favors.  In this day and age that would be for several thousand dollars a night.  Obviously, the laws as now written prevent women from becoming easy millionaires by forbidding her to use her body as she wishes.  Technically this is unjust.

Even more unjust is arresting some poor John who has done no wrong in purchasing a woman’s product of which she is free to dispose.

Of course, the law forbids a woman from exercising this privilege or right.  Like marijuana advocates say when the product is made legal crime will cease.

This then poses a problem for candidate Doug Jones.  Regardless of whether he favored young women Moore will have been perfectly within his rights, in the above considerations,  in pursuing the women as long as didn’t use force.  Rape, of course, violates the woman’s right.  That they may have acquiesced to the importunatations of Moore doesn’t mean Moore is liable for any censure.  The women have no complaint.  Certainly a firm no or I’ll call the police would have sufficed to dissuade anyone but a rapist.

So, the whole sexual brou ha ha appears to based on outmoded laws or behavior of women if women are to truly have control of their body.  If they err in judgment that is their own concern.  If they want to terminate a pregnancy the day before birth or even murder the new born it is the product of their own body and no concern to society.  Right?

Trump, Clinton And Deep Politics

Trump, Clinton And Deep Politics

by

R.E. Prindle

 

 

Much noise has been created about possible Russian involvement in the recent presidential election.  Conflicting reports have the Russians favoring either now Pres. Trump or, on the other hand, Clinton.  It has been considered especially reprehensible that Pres. Trump was ‘elected’ by the Russians.  And if this defies common sense whatever influence Russia may have had it could not possibly equal the US media hate blitz unremittingly directed at Trump for well over a year leading up to the election.  One wonders how Trump survived it.  Yet this supposed invisible Russian influence overrode the US media hate fest.

However, in a situation nearly totally obscured by the US MSM both Trump and the Clintons were involved with the Jewish/Russian Mafiya.  This is not to say they were willingly but as the Jewish mob was extremely powerful, especially in NYC, coercion was involved.

The Jewish Russian criminals arrived en masse on our shores after the downfall of the Soviet Union in the nineties.  They came in the thousands destroying Brooklyn’s Brighton Beach suburb.  Extortion was a key racket so it is probable that both Trump and the Clintons were forced to pay for protection.

I will deal with Pres. Trump in another article but first I wish to give an indication of the Clintons’ involvement.  This is a quote from Robert I. Friedman’s book Red Mafiya:  How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America.  This Mafiya is always referred to as Russian but in fact they are all Jews from Russia.  P. 267-68.

Grigor Loutchansky, a Latvian born convicted felon and president of the Austrian-based NORDEX, a multinational trading company, had been implicated in everything from major money laundering to smuggling nuclear components.  House speaker Newt Gingrich once said the US government officials believed Loutchansky had shipped Scud missile warheads to Iraq from North Korea.  The ubiquitous Loutchansky was also a former business associate of both Chernomyrden and Semion Mogelevitch, according to CIA and other Western intelligence officials.  Yet somehow this enormously wealthy underworld rogue was invited to a private Democratic National Fund-raising dinner for Clinton in 1993.  During coffee, Clinton turned to the mobster to ask a favor:  would he pass along to the Ukrainian government requesting it to reduce its nuclear stockpile?  Clinton then posed for a photograph with the grinning hood, which Loutchansky later liberally passed out among his cronies, greatly enhancing his stature among corrupt government officials and the criminal underworld.  When the photo of the men shaking hands was eventually published in a Russian newspaper, the CIA analyzed it to see if it was fake.  When they discovered it was genuine, agency officials were aghast.  “Loutchansky had one thing in mind:  legitimization,” a congressional investigator probing Russian organized crime explained.  “He wanted US citizenship and he wanted to buy a US bank.”

 

This criminal Mafiya organization that as Friedman explains had seriously corrupted US society and politics has been almost completely ignored by the MSM.  The Clintons were involved as early as 1993 and judging from contributions to their charity fund it has continued until today.  According to Friedman the US CIA and FBI were well aware of the Jewish mob and yet did little about it.  One imagines that this Mafiya’s influence on US politics was much more effective than any of the Russian government.

Is There An Anti-Democratic Movement In The US

Is There An Anti-Democratic

Movement In The US?

by

R.E. Prindle

https://newrepublic.com/article/138019/right-giving-democracy

 

My attention was drawn to the above linked article by a Facebook colleague, Michael Sellers.  Michael is a Liberal and viewed the article differently than myself who am a historical researcher and hence have no interest in political labels as such.  I try to rise above current disputes to put them into a larger or macro historical context.  As President Obama says of himself:  when they go low I go high.

Thus the article of 10/24/16 by one Jeet Heer entitled The Right Is Giving Up On Democracy seemed to me to be analyzable in a macro context; that is Global rather than parochial.  That involves the current problem of the transfers of populations from one area of the globe to another.  This usually means from outside Euroamerica to European and North American countries.

As Euroamerica is the gold standard for advanced cultures the migrants come from less developed countries and often from medieval or even primitive cultures centuries behind in modern knowledges.  While these migrants appear to adapt to the advanced culture of Euroamerica it is but doubtful they can understand it.

Such is the case with Jeet Heer who wrote the article under consideration.  While biographical information is difficult to obtain about Mr. Heer he came from Southern India.  He now resides in the Canadian Province of Manitoba, Canada.  Whether Mr. Heet was born in Canada or arrived in North America as a young child isn’t clear.  At any rate his parents are native to India.  Why they chose to leave that beautiful warm country for cold and desolate Canada seems inscrutable but apparently they were dissatisfied with that ancient and lovely culture.  Perhaps India wasn’t diverse enough, so they chose to live in the multi-cultural West.

As any trans-national migrant knows, or should know, the transition from being an Indian to an English speaking Canadian would be difficult.  However as India was tutored by England over a period of centuries that has melded to some extent Indian and English mores and customs perhaps the Heer family foresaw fewer problems than they experienced.  In any event as Mr. Heet says they brought the whole extended Heer family after them.

As the Americas were settled by peoples from outside the continent a certain attitude developed toward immigrants that favors new migrants over older migrants; that is new migrants are allowed to dispossess older migrants in much the same way that the exogenous peoples originally dispossessed the indigenous peoples.

It is no surprise then that Mr. Heer was been made senior editor of the US Communist magazine The New Republic while older migrants perhaps more qualified were passed over.  While, from reading Mr. Heer’s work, I am sure there must be more qualified people from an earlier wave of migrants who understand that strange beast, the American psyche, better.  I must believe that Mr. Heer is unqualified for the position he enjoys, I don’t see the necessary acumen.

Mr. Heer titles his article:  The Right Is Giving Up On Democracy.  He does this without realizing the Left’s definition of democracy.  He apparently thinks theirs is the only definition while there are many others.  In mid-twentieth century US democracy was understood to mean that class distinctions  had a minimal effect on any and individual’s right to achieve whatever his abilities permitted.  At the three quarter point of the century the Liberal reinterpretation of democracy began to replace the traditional idea.

Democracy since that point has been interpreted to mean that collectives have rights to extort whatever they can to dominate society disregarding individual rights.  Each collective is supposed to have a right to a proportional representation regardless of individual ability that displaces merit.  Thus the lesser able or qualified displace the meritorious.  For instance, since women constitute roughly 50% of the population it is thought right that 50% of all, say, executives must be women regardless of merit if they are not then democracy is being violated.   Racially it is thought that executives must ‘look like’ the population.  That is the colored should displace whites regardless of merit.  No tests of ability are permitted because that might be discriminatory.   Thus the best will be shunted aside to satisfy ideology.  That seems to be how Mr. Heet got his job.

So, he says the right is giving up on democracy, but the Left abandoned democracy long ago.  Apparently Mr. Heer cannot recognize that the Leftist president, Barack Obama created an authoritarian dictatorship eight years ago.  Obama has rigged the system.  He assumes the roles of the executive, legislative and judicial in himself.  He was in the process of appointing stooges to the Supreme Court who wouldn’t challenge his preemption of Congress by issuing executive orders because the ‘emergency’ of the moment required it.  The Left calls this democracy.

It is no wonder then that the Right realizing that democracy had been aborted began searching for an alternative.  Catching this sets Mr. Heer off on his rant.  He follows the Leftist rhetoric.  Naturally he builds his case on a rejection of his scapegoat Trump.  Because in the Third Debate in a provocative question from the Jewish moderator, Chris Wallace, who demanded irrelevantly of Trump whether, as I understood it, Trump would contest the count if it went against him.  Trump’s answer was a reasonable, we’ll wait and see.  Mr. Heer interpreted the question and answer to mean Trump would lead an armed uprising, hence giving up on democracy.

It was of course a set up question as Hillary answered decidedly Yes.  But, of course, if your party were rigging the election in your favor who wouldn’t.

Trump’s answer then prompted Mr. Heer to come to the startling conclusion:  ‘As always with Trump the temptation is to interpret this apostasy through the lens of individual psychology.’  [By ‘apostasy’ I presume Mr. Heer means from democracy as though democracy were a religion.]

Heet continues:  This diagnosis is easy enough:  By discounting the election results beforehand, Trump was preemptively assuming the role of a sore loser, exhibiting an irresponsible peevishness all too characteristic of his runaway narcissism and his sexism….

Whew!  He’s got the words but not the rhythm.  Sexism?  What’s that?  Aren’t homosexuals and lesbians sexist by their very nature?  Isn’t feminism sexist for the same reason?  Aren’t those groups aggressive in their sexism?  Are not they narcissistic by definition?  You see how Mr. Heer undermines his own argument.

And then…Mr. Heer slams half the country, dividing it into two camps …’and bringing the yahoos of the Republican base along with him.’  The left has a lot of defamatory names for those who disagree with them.  Defamation is their mode of argument.  Obama called us Domestic Terrorists among many others, racists.  Knuckle draggers, that is, I presume, gorillas (gorilla is a racist word in the US, ape, monkey) but the Left don’t pay no mind unless it is used against them.

Then comes another unwarranted assumption:  ‘Yet such a personalized account of Trump’s behavior has the effect of letting his political  party and supporters off the hook.  Not just for supporting him but for sharing his grim view of American democracy.’

Can Mr. Heer support such inflammatory opinions, for that is all they are. I don’t think he has accurately represented me in his blanket condemnation of Trump supporters.  But Mr. Heer is just getting started.  I’m just hitting the high spots now.  Nearly every sentence is wildly wide of the mark.

After excoriating Trump in his first couple pages or four or five hundred words Mr. Heer then turns to the matter of his article’s title, that of the right giving up on democracy.  Which of many versions of democracy he doesn’t say but one presumes all democracy but more especially the ‘our’ democracy of the Left.

He does however provide a reason for the Right’s giving up on democracy, he says:  ‘Beyond this election, beyond even the fate of the Republican Party, there is a significant minority of Americans who are giving up on democracy because it doesn’t serve their purpose of upholding a white Christian patriarchy.’

If one dissects this sentence one quickly discerns that what we have here is a religious fear.  Mr. Heer isolates the religious fear of democracy as a White Christian matter.  This begs the question of the fear of democracy of other religions.  How exclusive is this fear to Christianity?  Certainly the Semitic religions are consumed by fear of democracy they being in essence authoritarian in nature.  Does Mr. Heer think that Moslemism is democratic in its beliefs?  Surely, he jests.  There is no more authoritarian patriarchal religion and government than Moslemism.  Has Mr. Heer never heard of ISIS?  Need I say more?  Nor is the Judaic religion any more democratic than Moslemism.  Judaism is the father of Moslemism.

We have no way of knowing whether Mr. Heer is Moslem or Hindu but need I remind Mr. Heer that Hinduism is a caste society where neither equality or democracy has been known for millennia.  Mr. Heer must know all this so that isolating Christianity as paternalistic and undemocratic is sheer and total bigotry.  Therefore we are right to treat Mr. Heer himself as an unbalanced bigot.

How then ae we to treat Mr. Heer’s ridiculous statement: ‘Trump’s anti-democratic rhetoric- and the eagerness of so many good white patriotic Americans to cheer it and believe it- as a symptom of the larger trend on the political right toward doubting the legitimacy of the American system.  The question that we need to be asking isn’t, “Why is Trump being such a jerk?”  It’s why is the American Right giving up on democracy?’

Why indeed?  Could it be that anti-democratic forces such as the Moslems, the Jews and Negroes have very nearly subverted democracy itself making its maintenance impossible in a multi-cultural environment in which so many of those cultures have no tradition of democracy, don’t understand it and see no reason to maintain it.

While fashionably inveighing against authoritarian government that is the very form of government they wish to impose making themselves the supreme law giving culture.  Thus we have the Moslem wish to impose Sharia law in the West, the Jewish wish to impose Jewish law, the Negro wish to impose African supremacy and so on.  The chorus of all is that Whites have to submit to their particular mores, laws and culture.  Whites simply cannot exist.

Mr. Heer must know this and our Mike Sellers ought to know this.  Please abandon the hypocrisy.  Democracy is over, murdered by the very people appearing to laud it.  Today it is culture against culture, all against one and one against all.

Whites should bloc vote for Trump; it is every culture for itself. 
 



Vote Trump or get on your knees.

 

The Plot Against America: Character Assassination And Politics

The Plot Against America:

Character Assassination And Politics

By

R.E. Prindle

 

More dangerous is that a Trump administration would give respectability and power to the gutter voices of American politics.

--Bret Stephens

They meet in secret.  Men of immense wealth; a woman of limitless ambition.  Their passports are American but their loyalties are not.  Through their control of international banks and the media they manipulate public opinion and finance political deceit.  Their aim is nothing else than the annihilation of American political independence, and they will stop at nothing- including rigging a presidential election- to achieve it.

Joseph McCarthy, c. 1950,

as quoted by Bret Stephens.

 

Mr. Stephens in his WSJ article of 9/18/16 titled The Plot Against America.  Sneaking up on the reader the McCarthy quote above was presented as Mr. Stephens own words.  Mr. Stephens says:  Astute readers will note the quotation of a speech, there was no indication that it was a quote,  delivered…by Joe McCarthy.  I suppose there are astute readers who immediately recognized the quote.  I wasn’t one of them.  One does note, however, how timely Gunner Joe’s speech is in relation to today.  The ‘conspiracy’ rolls merrily along.  Why is it a conspiracy and not just politics.  It is open for all to see.  Google The Committee For Public Relations.  Subscribe to their magazine:  Foreign Affairs.  Read H.G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy.  There isn’t any hidden conspiracy here, it is a political program. 

Mr. Stephens links the ‘gutter politics’ of McCarthy to the ‘gutter politics’ of Donald Trump,  ‘Donald Trump alights on the Compleat Conspiracy [he says].  Anti-Semites are thrilled.’  Oh, we see, the Fuehrer has returned.  Dum de dum dum.  As improbable as it may sound Trump is accused of starting the ovens up for a replay of the ‘never again’ holocaust.  Ah, if only Hitler and Trump had been strangled in their cradles the 40s and today’s replay wouldn’t be possible.

Forget McCarthy’s conspiracy, Mr. Stephens as apparent spokesperson for the Jews has concocted his own immense conspiracy.

Quote:

Pat Buchanan would be its intellectual godfather, Ann Coulter and Ms. Ingraham its high priestesses, Breitbart and the rest of the alt-right web its public trumpets.  American Jews shouldn’t have to live the 1930s in order to figure out that the ‘globalist cabal’ might mean them.

Unquote.

Ah so, number one son, I see, even though not of the alt-right or part of any conspiracy, large or small, I must be one of Trumps’ Trumpeteers.  In short, Mr. Stephens calls me the equivalent of a bastard.  I am unqualified to be a citizen of this Liberal ‘Democracy’ of his.  Obama’s vaunted inclusiveness excludes half the population of the United States. 

But Mr. Stephens is calling us all ‘anti-Semites.’  This alone means that the polls favoring Hillary Clinton must be frauds or they wouldn’t be wheeling out the heavy artillery of dreaded ‘anti-Semitism.’   So the election is expected to turn on how well we love our Jews who have done so much to selflessly make our lives mo’ bettah.

Mr. Stephens apparently believes with Mad Hillary that we are in fact Deplorables.  Mr. Stephens has titled his piece after the title of Philip Roth’s novel of the same name.  The Plot Against America.  See how neatly he turned around responsibility.  His group isn’t plotting.  Who are the plotters?  Why, the American people who can’t be trusted to see straight and do the right thing.  Whatever happened to the infallible Common Man?

Mr. Stephens lays out the horror he and his side daily live with:

Quote:

(Mr. Roth) imagines what might have been for America if Lindbergh had defeated Franklin Roosevelt for the presidency in 1940, signed neutrality acts with Germany and Japan and initiated a reeducation campaign for recalcitrant American Jews.  The novel draws its power from being a too-plausible alternative reality, from which we were spared less by the wisdom of the public than the vagaries of history.

Unquote.

Ah, you see, we the stupid public couldn’t be trusted but blind luck saved us.

I have studied this period and rather than finding Mr. Roth’s fantasies all too plausible alternate history only one of many equally or more plausible scenarios.

The bete noir of the Jews, Charles Lindbergh, was not a bad person, he was not a crypto-Nazi, and he was not an anti-Semite.  When he said that Roosevelt, the British and the Jews were inveigling the country into a war that was of no concern to the US he but spoke the truth.  Would matters have been any worse in a cold war with Germany and Hitler than a cold war with Stalin and the Soviet Union?  Not that I can see.

And what were the Jews themselves doing at this critical time?  The Jews had been at open war with Germany since the Communist Revolution in Russia.  The Jews declared actual war on Germany in 1933 with the active collaboration of the Roosevelt Administration.  It has been conclusively proven that the English, Jews and FDR worked to get the US into the war as early as 1938 and from my researches from 1933 on.  Even the then dean of American historians, Charles Beard wrote a tome demonstrating it was so which cost him his reputation, career and place in American letters.  Character assassination with a vengeance. 

What then else did the Jews do?  A stooge named Theodore Kaufmann, a neighbor of Roth in Newark, composed a short book titled Germany Must Die.  That is the Jews were plotting the genocide of the Germans before the Germans conceived the so-called holocaust.  In his book he calculated that if all the German males were castrated Germany would die out in a generation.  The book was enthusiastically received in the US, abhorred in Germany, sold fantastically especially after a glowing review in Time Magazine and several influential newspapers.  The notion lodged in FDR’s brain.  Late in the war he was heard muttering that castration might be the final solution.

While Kaufmann gloated and FDR agonized, the whole of the American right was imprisoned (that is put in concentration camps) while awaiting their fate in kangaroo courts.

While Roth’s fantasy is less than probable there are many many other scenarios that could be written.  I thought that since 9/11 we were beyond all that but here we have Mr. Stephens and the Wall Street Journal pulling these old chestnuts out of the fire to use again.  Trite, trite canards.

To quote Mr. Welch, made famous by McCarthy:  At long last, Gentlemen, have you no self-respect?

Vote Trump.

Trump And The Potential For Voter Fraud

Trump And The Potential

For Voter Fraud

By

R.E. Prindle

 

The Wall Street Journal (10/12/16) presents an article titled: Trump Warns Of  ‘Stolen’ Election by Reinhard and Hook.  Of course the CFR crowd snarks at the idea and that there isn’t a history or voter fraud in the US there is, ignore their claim.  However what about the CFR (Council For Foreign Relations) and their self-righteous attitude?

The CFR was formed in 1921 in the wake of Wilson’s defeat over the League of Nations and the Cox-FDR election defeat of 1920 in which the despised Republican Warren G. Harding took the presidency back by a landslide.  The Leaguers considered their defeat the triumph of the unwashed, in Obama’s term today, we knuckledraggers.  As the CFRs cannot believe there is a legitimate point of view different from their own they set about to make sure the vox populi was never heard again.

As the founders represented the wealth of the country while being prominent they were able to secretly vett the candidates from each party to make sure the one elected would further the CFR program.

They have succeeded in every election to the present.  But in the 1940 election in which any respectable Republican candidate opposed the CFR war program the CFR brushed the Republican candidates aside and appointed an actual Democrat, Wendell Willkie, to oppose FDR.  Willkie was a mere echo of Roosevelt and was defeated.  The CFR got safely through that troubled election.

Today we have a candidate running who opposes the CFR program, that is, Donald Trump.  So for the first time since 1920’s Warren Harding debacle the CFR program is threatened.

You can see them thrashing around trying to find a Willkie-like replacement for Trump.  In desperation they shout that Trump is going to drop out.  They are threatening to illegally and forcefully remove him from the ballot.  The ‘stupid knuckledraggers’, that is, you and me, may escape their control.  Do you imagine then that they would stop at stuffing the ballot boxes?  Don’t believe it for one second.  Trump as usual is right.  Hillary, who despises we deplorables and cellar dwellers must be rejected;  the CFR must be stopped.  This will not be easy.  If necessary bodies will disappear; some may have fatal accidents or health problems not unlike Warren G. Harding himself who mysteriously died of food poisoning two years into his term.

You can bet on election fraud at the very least.

Beware and Vote Trump.

Sex And The Presidential Election

by

R.E. Prindle

 

There is a certain irreality pervading this election.  It is being played out like a Hollywood porn flick.  The participants don’t seem to notice while the media in  playing it up also seems not to recognize the filthy porn element.  Imagine playing up some nude photos of Melania Trump with no feeling of shame at all.

The hypocrisy is hip deep with a strong fast current.  One is disgusted beyond belief.  In a startling turn Hillary is OK even though she was an enabler and procurer for Bill’s sexual escapades and then worked to destroy the women he seduced.  Bill used his ‘celebrity’ status as a political nabob to literally take women.  As Donald Trump points out in a recent tape of a decades old private conversation being a celebrity does something to women so that they have little power of resistance.

Sigmund Freud, the old lech, also realized that in the presence of doctors women enter the door semi-hypnotized and are easy prey for the medical profession.  One imagines that doctors really enjoy their work as I’m sure old Siggy must have.

Women fall over sports figures.  Back in the ancient 1960s the quarterback of the Oakland City College team made it a requirement to sleep with any woman he dated.  They did it too.  Ever notice that Negro jocks have no trouble getting those gorgeous blond White girls.  Women are attracted to power or the illusion of it.  This fact offends the Lesbos who hate men.  They’ve been inoculated…maybe.  Check Hillary who is thought to be a Lesbo and Bill’s relationship.  In order to maintain an appearance of normality she became his procurer.

So, ignoring the very basis of sexual psychology a huge fuss in being raised about Trump stating the obvious, confirming Sigmund Freud’s observation, while in real life boys and girls play the age old game.  The Lesbos say Trump’s great crime was not enjoying his position as a celebrity but, apparently revealing a simple truth: women are not as pure and chaste as they would like to appear.  Reality has erected its ugly head.  What an election.  Reality?  What does that have to do with our fantasies?

So, using the amazingly effective Democrat double standard Hillary and Bill, sexual villains for the last couple decades are given a clean bill of health passing the monkey to Trump and are found to be suitable presidential timber.  Trump becomes the naughty boy definitely too short of character to be president.  What was that I read about the Liberal hero, Jack Kennedy?  Naw, couldn’t be true; we all know he was presidential timber.

Obama?  The Clintons?

The Empire founders over sex.

Oh well, vote Trump anyway.

Present At The Creation: A World We Witnessed Being Made

Present At The Creation:

A World We Witnessed Being Made

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Peggy Noonan, columnist for the Wall St. Journal had an interesting article (10/1-2/16) she entitled The Politics Of The Shallows concerning the internet’s influence on the intellectual fiber of the modern world. Her remarks are accurate still the internet has its uses, at least one of unparalleled value, that is as an encyclopedia and dictionary.  The breadth and depth of its coverage is breathtaking while exceeding both encyclopedia and dictionary in its ease and speed of use.

Secondly, in its encyclopedic use as a provider of pictures and images it has no parallel.  It is several major libraries and museums in one.  If you wish to examine the art of almost of any conceivable artist of any time period it has a biography of the artist accompanied in Images with an extensive catalog of the artists’ works adjustable to a variety of sizes.

Images of anything are there including maps of all ages, any insect, any device, anything. It is an unparalleled medical compendium.  There has never been anything like the internet and it is free with your provider’s bill

If one depends on the internet for serious study, as Miss Noonan says, it will be superficial and difficult to use compared to books.  The older generations with their print education are better prepared but the younger generations raised on computers may find it more difficult to get in depth information or know how to distinguish the deeper meaning of the subject.

Another major shortcoming of the internet is its ‘our way or the highway’ format which conditions the user to accept contracts that can’t be modified.  One is conditioned to accept a complete lack of flexibility.  Thus the political situation Miss Noonan complains about where there is little nuance in political affiliation. 

However the internet has come along and contributed to a major change in consciousness.  Miss Noonan, like myself, is of an age that can remember, that is know, the antecedent non-electronic world.  In many ways that world is now a parallel universe, a former universe that up-do-date generations do not want to recognize.  The motivations of people of those times are completely foreign to young people’s consciousness and incomprehensible.

The books that we elders found so wonderful are actually written in a style and vocabulary that is so foreign that the great classics of the nineteenth century through 1950-60 might as well be as Middle English was to us.  You have to work real hard to understand it.

Thus the young, and this is important, have no intellectual resources from before say 1960 and for those born after 1996, the year the internet came into being, what happened before that date is ancient history.  As I am approaching eighty young people look at me in wonder as though I have returned from the grave.  I do a lot of walking and I can understand the reaction; I don’t see many eighty year olds on my journeys and young people don’t go into old folks’ haunts.  There are settlements, colonies, called retirement communities containing virtually no one under seventy so the oldsters have self-segregated becoming invisible.

Thus the effect of the internet is multiplied.  A world is being created that is not being understood, that adjustments to accommodate it are not even being attempted.  In the changing conditions in which the American and Western world is being submerged by the rise of the colored peoples it may be that even current conditions will be submerged in a tidal wave of colored influences.

The US and Europe except for an execrated few, the Deplorables as Hillary Clinton terms us, doesn’t even seem to see what is happening.  The quiet appropriation of Western culture by the Chinese occurs without mention, by which I mean the main stream media.  It is forbidden to open your eyes.  The Chinese are buying up Hollywood and other media, wresting it from the Jews, and thus gaining control of the creation of mores.  Shortly movies and TV will be more Sino-Western than Judaeo-Western.

The books that Miss Noonan and the oldsters revere so much will not only become unintelligible because of the internet but because the language will be hybridized into a sort of Sino-English while Chinese will become the lingua-franca, hence whole libraries will sit unused.

I visited UC Berkeley a couple years ago and was startled at the very low percentage of non-colored students and they were quite hostile in a quiet way to my White presence.  I received many disapproving stares and a comment or two behind my back.

Of course at UC one can’t get back in the library stacks unless a graduate student.  The main Bancroft library of which I speak is closed to the student body but there are many secondary libraries undergraduates can visit including an extensive Asiatic building of considerable size.  That library was fairly busy although all the libraries were being used as dormitories.

Interestingly, within the Bancroft building UC has created a little museum of a library with card catalogs and no electronics.  This was occupied by mostly sleeping White students.  The books on the shelves looked like a remake of the movie Zardoz.  I imagined that they couldn’t have been touched for years maybe decades.  Viz.  H.G. Wells The Time Machine.

Yes, Miss Noonan, it is a changing world, a world being recreated, but you must remember a person of your age is essentially a Time Traveler or from a parallel universe and this this universe may become parallel before too long.  Welcome to the creation of a Brave New World.

PS:  You Can’t Go Home Again.

God Bless America

God Bless America

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Now is the time for all good people to come to the aid of their party.

 

As Woody Guthrie wrote in his immortal song:  This land is your land, this land is my land…  , and by extension, this land is our land.  This land is our home.

This election year will prove whose land it really is, our land or the land of roving transients from the four corners of the earth.  Renegade, so-called Americans of the Liberal Party, wish to transform our land into a land of indeterminate form, people and culture. 

Our culture, our hopes, our dreams are to be discarded, subsumed into what they call multi-culturalism.  One doesn’t have to be a genius to see that multi-culturalism is a transient condition; it will slowly evolve into a uniform culture.  The Liberals wish to discard our long and worthy culture in favor of whatever may be. 

This election will prove whether we can maintain a strong position, imposing our culture of being stripped of it.  It is an either or situation.  The schools must be reclaimed for our culture.  Of course there will be melding, that is an inevitable consequence of mixing cultures but our mores, our culture, our traditions must remain supreme.

Of course the Liberals have an arsenal of names to denigrate us:  racists, anti-Semites, homophobes, Islamaphobes, Basket Of Retards, but a laugh and a wave of the hand dismisses those defamations.

We must seize the moment.  As Irving Berlin wrote in his immortal hymn of 1940 when our culture then seemed doomed: God bless America, land that I love, stand beside her and guide her…. Yes, stand up and stand beside your land, your hopes and dreams, and guide her to a safe harbor.

Now is the hour to take our stand.  The hour will pass and won’t come again.  Carpe Diem: Seize the moment.  Get a basket of your friends together make sure you vote in November.  Make sure you vote Trump.  The Trump Party is the only and last chance.  Don’t fail your children and grand-children, vote, and vote Trump.  The future depends on you.

The Insincerity Of Khizr Khan

The Insincerity

Of Khizr Khan

by

R.E. Prindle

 

I thought the Khizr Khan thing would have died a natural death but since it hasn’t let me say a few things that seem to have been passed over.  At the base of the issue the Khans are Human Traffickers in collusion with the Clintons and the King of the Saudi Arabians.  The association has been very profitable for the Clintons who have received many lesser amounts as well as a 25 million dollar contribution to their trust from the Saudis.  What does one do for someone that merits that much money?  Something they considered very valuable.  What was it?  No one has asked the Clintons because the explanation might not go down so well.

The Clintons have known Khizr Khan for some time having received checks from him through his law firm.  Khan himself facilitates or facilitated  selling green cards to wealthy Moslems for 500,000.  The green cards were good for the Moslem purchaser’s entire extended family.  Thus Khan was the middleman in moving humans from the Middle East to the US.  Their son, who I am sure was a patriotic deep dyed American, nevertheless joined the Army to get a free education after.  His very wealthy parents who could easily have put him through the most expensive US college from the profits of their Human Trafficking thus are themselves scamming the US in what I would consider a less than patriotic way.  Do the Khan’s have undivided loyalty to the US as they claimed?  Not very likely.

Now, the Clintons pretend not to have not known about the Khans and their son until a staffer allegedly heard about their story contacting them to speak against Trump at the convention.  What the basis of their request might have been isn’t clear.  Why would the Clintons wish to conceal their friendship with the Khans?  Obviously something is going on here but we are led to believe that the Khan’s hate Donald Trump for some unexplained reason and wished to take this opportunity to condemn him.  What was the reason for their asking:  Donald Trump have you ever read the Constitution?  It had nothing to do with their son’s death in action in Iraq.  Obviously it was because Trump threatened their Human Trafficking livelihood.  It is a money related issue.  Their Human Trafficking was threatened  by Trump’s intent to ban Moslem immigration.  Talk about coal miners losing their jobs, Khizn stood to lose a fortune.    How many green cards had he already sold?  Loyalty to the US, faugh! 

How many tens of thousands could he sell if not cut off?

Now, there is nothing in the Constitution that guarantees anyone a right to immigrate to the US.  There is nothing in the Constitution that denies the US the right to refuse immigrants for any reason or to suspend immigration altogether.  With a few exceptions the last has been done.

So, Mr. Khan, as the fine Constitutional scholar that you are can you point to the words that affirm anyone a right to immigrate into the US?  Can you point to the words that say members of a religious class cannot be selectively excluded?

Mr. Khan, if you’re out there, we are waiting for your answers.  Educate us, please. 

Vote Trump

Hillary Clinton: Mad Mama Merkel's Disciple

Hillary Clinton

Our Mad Mama Merkel

By

R.E. Prindle

 

The real bone of contention is this election is whether we will have an influx of a million Middle Eastern Moslems or not.  The democrats define their opponents as unfeeling bigots, knuckle dragging morons who flunked out at kindergarten for refusing to allow such a disintegrating element into this country.  There are many reasons to reject immigration of any kind none of which refers to religion and/or ethnicity but they do not concern us here.

The important thing here is that as the Moslems fifteen hundred years of history show they always come as conquerors.  They mean to change the nature of any country they enter exclusively to their own religion, law, mores and customs.  They are Judaism perfected.  This is not open to question.

Clinton and the Dems are willing to accept the consequences that they most clearly recognize.  Trump and his Party prefer the existing Western Culture of the US hence rejection of Moslem immigration.

There is no difference between the Moslem invasion of the US than the English invasion of post-Columbian North America.

In the English settlements in Virginia the Indian tribes on more than one occasion wiped them out.  Was that an act of xenophobia or an act self-preservation?  Unfortunately for the Indians English reserves were large and they kept coming.  The consequence was that the Indians were wiped out.

In the Massachusetts  colony the Wampanoags might easily have destroyed the English invaders but chose to aid them.  Whether ‘xenophobes’ pushed to exterminate the invaders or not the consequence of their benevolence was the same as in Virginia.  The Indians were overwhelmed.

Hillary, who must have misplaced any brain God gave her, refuses to learn from history so rather than refuse entry she sends planes to the Middle East to fly them here.  Inevitable result?  A repetition of the Indians with the English.

Do we have to look far to verify the consequences?  No.  Only across the Pond to the Germany of Mad Mama Merkel.  Mama… the derogatory term the Moslems give to that silly woman.

Mad Mama has not only let in but kicked down the doors and waved the Moslems on.  The result?  Endless and increasing acts of violence, murder, and rape.  Wholesale rapes in one day of thousands of German women in the city of Cologne.  Mad Mama obviously hates her own sex or she is brutally letting the Moslems fuck them.  Maybe Mad Mama is sexually repressed.

Does Hillary think the same won’t happen in the US.  Of course not, she hopes it will.  She’s going to encourage it just like Mad Mama.  It is part of the Liberal ideology.  Sarkozy of France wanted to pass a law requiring French women to fuck Africans.  It was the only way to break down racial barriers for the amalgamation of races he said.  Mad Mama belongs to the same ideology  but rather than pass a law requiring German girls to fuck Moslems she gives Moslems carte blanche to rape them.

Is this Hillary’s plan for the US?  She comes from the same ideological group as Mad Mama and Sarkozy so what else can be the plan?

So if you vote for the evil witch Hillary, disciple of Mad Mama Merkel, you are voting for the rape of American womanhood.  May you suffer the consequences personally if you do.

 

Vote Trump

Save Our Souls

Save Our Souls

by

R.E. Prindle

 

One is astonished at how thick Liberals are.  During this campaign they have offered a never ending stream of insults at Donald Trump, not to mention the rest of we knuckledraggers, gun huggers etc.  Trump has not only been insulted but the insults have been basely demeaning, did I use the word defamatory?  That’s what I meant.

To insult someone running against a useless piece of baggage like Hillary Clinton takes a lot of chutzpah.

In their assumed sense of superiority one would think they’re dealing with an idiot child.  Now, how does one react to truly hurtful reproaches by those who claim to be the most sensitive people on earth?  You can’t get angry and bury yourself which is what they’re aiming at.  Few people have given Trump credit for an amazing level of self-control.  Rather than lash back he reacted by jokes that are just too subtle for the Liberal intelligence.  They don’t get it.

Witness his sly parodies of the Levy Bread ads of the Sixties, while using a solid six point star just as others such as Disney have and being savaged by brutes who using their famous double standard of Good for us but Bad for you.  A six point star is not the so-called Star of David.  The so-called Star of David is actually an occult symbol indicating the Above and Below.  It was appropriated by the Jews as their special symbol sometime in the Middle Ages.  To make a fuss over Trump’s use of it only demonstrates how thick they really are.

If it were possible to believe the preposterous one would be the unbelievably insulting question put to Trump that if he is elected in November does he intend to assume the office?  I guess one can believe the preposterous.  It’s open season now.  Can anyone understand the depth and breadth  of such an insult?  Can anyone understand the hurt that the Trump had to swallow?  Can anyone understand the depth of his contempt when he refused a direct answer and laughingly replied:  You’ll have to wait and see.

In the Liberals contempt for Trump, they couldn’t even see that he was putting them on.

Only we can save ourselves from a perpetual servitude to these Liberal thugs.  The question really is, will they allow Trump to be sworn in, or will they reject the voice of Democracy?  All their blather about the rule of law is just that, bushwa.

Save Our Souls

Vote Trump