A Review:  The National Enquirer

3/13/17

President Trump: The Secret Psych

Evaluation.

by

R.E. Prindle

 

‘The only publication with the guts to tell it like it is,’ in the 3/13/17 issue published an article titled: Trump’s Shocking Psyche File.  Deconstructing the hyperbole the National Enquirer story gives an accurate idea of the mind of the President.

Always bear in mind that governments prepare psychological profiles of prominent actors of other countries.  You may be sure that the Russians have profiled Trump the President carefully noting how he reacts in various situations.  Hopefully the President is aware of this and tries to out maneuver his profilers by not reacting as they expect.  You may be sure that the US also has a psychological profile on Putin and leading members of his government.

More appropriately the article answers the long time criticisms describing the President’s mentality as unfit for the job.  The article begins

• Natural born leader Donald Trump is a highly focused, driven and charismatic genius who thinks outside the box- almost too smart for his own good….  While critics have suggested America’s commander in chief has displayed “grave mental instability” mental health experts told the National Enquirer President Trump is more than capable of handling the rigors of the Oval Office.

I’m sure the President has been waiting some time to hear something like that.  Anent the claim that the President is an unbalanced narcissist a Beverly Hills psychiatrist, Dr. Carole Lieberman told the NE:

“President Trump has narcissistic personality traits”- but that’s not a bad thing.  She explained:  “In order to think yourself capable of holding the most important office in the world, one has to have some degree of narcissism,” which shrinks define as being self-centered, craving admiration and trumpeting personal talents.

According to the NE the Presidents IQ of 163 makes him the second smartest president following JQ Adams at 169.

Explaining the President’s handshake:

Gartner insisted Trump “takes a friendly gesture and makes it an opportunity to dominate another person,” while Lieberman analyzed  the President’s handshake and concluded; “It consists of two movements.  First, he draws the person to him, signaling that he wants to be closer.  Secondly, he pats the hand, in a comforting gesture, to reassure them of his good will.”

That’s fine as far as it goes but his violent handshake with Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch might be interpreted as a threat as in ‘You better not let me down.’  I hope Gorsuch got it.

I don’t know what the psychiatric evaluators of Clinton, Bush and Obama revealed but I doubt if any of them appeared as or more qualified for the role than President Trump.  Hopefully the NE article will set a new trend toward a more balanced positive approach to the President.  He is doing what he said he would do.

If you remember he claimed that he would have China take a more active approach to controlling Korea’s Kim Sung On.  You will notice that after Kim’s latest missile rattling trick the Chinese did step up tell him to cool it.

Whether the President phoned the Chinese or they just decided it might be an appropriate gesture I can’t say but they have never done it before, so once again the President is delivering on a campaign promise.

Step back and give him room to do his thing; you might be surprised and pleased.  Remember his campaign song of the Rolling Stones:  You can’t always get what you want; but if you try sometime you might find what you need. 

Mick missed his chance.

Time Must Have A Stop

by

R.E. Prindle

 

President Trump is really changing our lives.  I’m doing all kinds of things I haven’t done for years.  I bought a copy of the National Review with a cover story about President Trump and that sour grape Obama.  Now, after forty years on I actually bought a copy of Time Magazine because the cover story promotes a revolution against the President.  ‘The Resistance Rises (in pink, indicating a female resistance).  How  A March Becomes A Movement.  The picture portrays the pink bonnet of the revolting ladies.  A symbol of the vulva makes the front cover of Time.  Pornography in disguise.  The whole issue of only 60 pages drums up a revolution. 

Sixty pages, and Time calls that a magazine.  I remember when they were thick, a hundred twenty pages or more,  maybe two hundred, with a hundred pages of prime advertising.  This pitiful thing has ads from Kelloggs and Chevy and a bunch of medical stuff, White guy with hepatitis.

Time-Life used to be the life blood of intellectual America then they were merged with Warner Bros. of Hollywood and it was all downhill from there.  The mag was founded about 1923  by Henry Luce and others and quickly became a success, then they bought the Life name for mega bucks from its publisher.  The first Life was a humor magazine of the early century that fell on hard times when the country lost its sense of humor, hasn’t found it yet.

Founded in New York City, Time posed as a conservative mag.  But as NYC was 25% Jewish and another 25% Communist or left leaning the staff reflected the demographics of the city which meant it was boring from within staffed mainly with Reds.  Henry Luce married Clare Booth which made her the famous Clare Booth Luce.  She had been an NYC party girl of liberated morals.  At one time the mistress of the notorious Bernard Baruch, the advisor of presidents.  She never lost her attachment after marrying Henry.  She even bought a house next door to Bernie, presumably so she wouldn’t have to walk too far. 

That was in the early forties at the same time Whittaker Chambers began his rise to editorship of the mag.  While hiring a notorious Communist like Chambers may have seemed a folly to more balanced minds, Chambers claimed he had renounced Communism a few months before assuming the job.

Possibly, but isn’t that a Communist ploy to insinuate operatives inside the Capitalist horse so they can bore from within?  Sometime later infamous Red, Max Eastman, who also supposedly saw the light, rose to prominence at Reader’s Digest.  After having thought and lived as Communists for decades did they suddenly learn to think like seasoned Capitalists?  Does anyone believe that?  Send 9.99 and a stamped return envelope  and I’ll return a deed to the Brooklyn Bridge.  I said ‘a’ deed not ‘the’ deed.  Read the fine print.

Whittaker Chambers made big money at Time through the forties until he suddenly quit his lucrative job for a non-lucrative job exposing Communists in government.  Exposing Communists is OK but proving it is another thing.  How many dedicated conservatives made themselves look like fools chasing Reds?  Is it possible that Whittaker was maybe a lure to destroy the Right?  If Alger Hiss hadn’t lied Nixon would never have redeemed his name, and to this day there are people to defend Hiss even though subsequent information has proven that he not only lied but was a Communist agent of the deepest dye.  My thought is that while Chambers may have turned in his card did he ever sever his loyalty to the Party?

So, with all of the Time-Life publications there was a Red tinge to them.  Kind of like when you feel like throwing up but never do.

We all read Time, I began shortly after graduation from high school after I joined the Navy.  At home the closest we got to intellectual matters was a subscription to the National Geographic.  I was a fairly avid reader then from 1957 to 1965 when I realized that the mag was not only pink underneath but totally dishonest.  Many of their news stories, maybe all for what anyone knows,  were total fiction.  What spurred me to leave was Time’s reporting of Howard Hughes departure from Las Vegas. The guy, or woman, who wrote the ‘eye witness’ report wasn’t even there and it didn’t happen as it was reported.

During the period I was reading the magazine though, Time-Life was instrumental in creating the culture of the early Sixties.  The two magazines made the art scene of New York.  That’s where they published.  While billed as a national magazine it was essentially New York in its outlook not much different from the New Yorker in that respect.   Andy Warhol might have lived and died a cypher without the fabulous exposure, or advertising if you will, of Time-Life.  Life even put Ed Sanders of the Fugs on their cover.  How’s that for diving deep into the barrel?  Life even gave a photo essay to Edie Sedgwick, one of Warhol’s drama queens.  Unknown beyond the Hudson but making the scene in New York City.

And Now, Vol. 189 #4, 2017 this pitiful relic fighting for its life attempts to make an exhibition of snit a movement.  Given that the mag was fiction in 1965 what is its coverage of the President likely to be?

I’ll let you know as soon as I read a couple articles.  I’ve already looked over the Chevy and Kellogg’s ads.  Never bought either and now I never will. Boycott everything that smells of the other half.  A pity though that after a hundred years it is a small distance from now until Time must have a stop.

The Greatest Scam: A Conspiracy Theory

The Greatest Scam:

A Conspiracy Theory

By

R.E. Prindle

 

There has always been an element troubling me about the Trump candidacy.  There seems a smack of insincerity, of calculation.  A hidden agenda.

Often overlooked in considering political entities is the Money Trust.  The Trust operates above all other entities.  What the old theorists referred to as the Invisible Hand.   It has been active in the US since at least the Civil War.  Its primary, indeed, only, concern is to make money by any possible means whether in creating value or destroying it then recreating it, destroying it ad infinitum.

Thus, in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries the railroads were a fertile field for looting, rebuilding and relooting.

Since the second half of the twentieth century major looting have taken place not only in companies but whole industries, to mention only the largest, the Savings and Loan industry and then the housing bubble of the early twenty-first century.  Less noticed was the successful effort to empty the accrued value in mortgages by encouraging home owners to ‘free up’ that value by borrowing against equity for frivolous reasons such as vacations.

When the housing bubble burst, by then the wealth of the country had been transferred to the banks.  The banks had cleverly divested themselves of the worthless mortgages by packaging them as a security and selling the securities to suckers who we all know never deserve an even break.

When the bubble burst this still left a deficit to be covered so carrying the looting even further the banks demanded and got two trillion dollars from the government in two installments called bail-outs.  This virtually bankrupted the US leaving little else to steal or seemingly so.  The ingenuity of the bankers was not so easily exhausted.

Now they turned the country upside down emptying its pockets by sending the US economy overseas to China or South to Mexico and environs.  Like the railroads of the nineteenth century the US had been destroyed.  Now the money was to be made in rebuilding.

Now we come to the truly incredible part, very chancy.  The tools used to destroy the country Clinton, Bush (both Bushes, keys to the story) and Obama were not suitable for rebuilding.  A different type was needed.  The transition would not be easy as the redirection from destruction to construction would be needed.  As is well known the financial destiny of the world, not just the US, is in the hands of the people of Goldman-Sachs.  GS was prominent in all the administrations, most especially as guides for the non-entity called Barack Obama.

Goldman-Sachs had built up a titan of the construction industry, Donald J. Trump.  Billing himself as the King of Debt Trump was financed by Goldman-Sachs and other Jewish financiers.  Trump was and is surrounded by Jews.  He owes his existence to them.  He had to be the tool for the transition from destruction to construction as the money was now to be had by rebuilding the US economy.

Getting Trump elected was very chancy but with probably a certain amount of acumen the Jewish financiers had sharpened the right tool.  A New York Liberal all his life, not unlike the 1940 Republican candidate Wendell Willkie, Trump switched to championing the disenfranchised, expounding positions quite foreign to a New York Liberal.  Trump declared himself independent of Wall Street money so that the financiers had to be appearing to be backing their openly Liberal candidate Hillary Clinton.  This was a tough balancing act but one seemingly successfully negotiated.

Trump, while appearing a clown, ran a brilliant campaign based not on capturing the popular vote but using the electoral college.  Thus while Clinton appears to have won the popular vote (there are serious questions as to the eligibility of millions of voters) Clinton was soundly defeated in the electoral college.

While Trump was reviled, criminally defamed, during the campaign one expected that there would be some revelation just before the election defaming him further.  Strangely the reverse happened.  There seemed to be a letting up of slander against Trump while a barrage of heavy negatives was unloaded against Clinton instead making her campaign stagger.  It would appear that the Clinton dynasty was being discarded as, indeed, it was.  She was no longer useful.

Trump himself is committed to reversing the destructive policies of the Liberals and as there are more trillions to be made in reconstructing the country thus enriching the bankers further it is impossible that Trump won’t do what he has pledged.

In the process, it will be necessary to recreate prosperity for the greatest number.  Thus the greed of the few will likely create a decade or so of great prosperity which in turn will create the possibility for further looting.  I think the country has that to look forward to.

The kids will be able to move out from mom and dad’s.

How’s that for a probable scenario?  God bless we conspiracy theorists.

Mindless Condemnation Of Donald Trump

Mindless Condemnation

Of Donald Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

I’m getting rather tired of this mindless condemnation of Donald Trump.  On 6/6/16 the Editorial Board of the New York Times wrote an item titled Donald Trump’s Contempt For The Rule Of Law.  This is pure defamation.  Where is the ADL when you need them?

The Board (Boards write editorials?) is referring to Trump’s fears that he will be railroaded by a Mexican judge in the ridiculous Trump University suit.  He is going to be railroaded no matter what race or ethnicity the judge is.  So just as a base or foundation let us assume that Trump is going to be railroaded (as the Board knows full well) and will undoubtedly be hit with a humongous fine that, like Texaco, he will have to bankrupt himself to avoid the injustice.  We may expect the verdict along about October 28^th of this year just before the election.

Justice is not the issue here: the issue is Get Trump!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Board quotes a Face The Nation talking head named John Dickerson as remind(ing) Mr. Trump that this country has a tradition of not judging people based on their heritage…  Give me a break.  The Negroes have been complaining for decades that they can’t get justice from White judges and juries.  Our president Barry insists that thousands of Negroes have been wrongly incarcerating and is freeing them daily.  That’s a lot of injustice based on heritage Board of Editors.  Maybe Trump should be concerned.

The Moslems insist on Sharia law not trusting White law.  The Jews get their notion of justice, according to them, directly from their G-d who is an authority superseding the Constitution of the United States.

George Lincoln Rockwell the former American Feuhrer of the American Nazi Party could expect consideration from no judge.  Oh, that’s right, he was a Nazi and therefore had no human rights.  He looked like one but, you know, appearances can be deceiving.  Say, haven’t the Mexicans been comparing Trump to Hitler?

Let’s just say it’s the tradition is an ideal and like all ideals is observed only in the breach.  I myself have seen a hostile judge charge a jury with the words:  You cannot find for this defendant.   I have read of other instances also.  I have seen chicanery on the bench.

I don’t know who the morons are on this editorial board but catch a ferry to this universe from whichever parallel universe you’re inhabiting now.

Mr. Trump is not bigoted toward Mexicans.  He can be expected to be objective toward them as much as Curiel can be expected to be objective toward him whether he was born in Indiana or not. Maybe you people are the bigots, Board, did you ever think of that?

So all people born in Indiana have the same opinions, experience and ideals no matter what their backgrounds?  I don’t think so. I was born in Michigan, just North of Indiana, and like any other American I had to deal with people from diverse backgrounds.  Many diverse backgrounds.  We didn’t all think alike and I wouldn’t trust any of them to be my judge.

The specific concern of Trump is that Curiel who is a professional Mexican, leader of La Raza and all that, will railroad him because as an undiluted American Trump demands that Mexicans follow US immigration laws and apply for a visa.  The Boards’ opinion is that they ‘don’t need no steenking visas.’

Trying to funny before people with no sense of humor at the risk, (risk? certainty) of being misunderstood, the Mexicans act like banditos, poor ones, as their own people exploit them leading them in long strings across burning deserts where many fall by the wayside leaving their bones to bleach under the burning sun.

Hell, I would call Trump a great humanitarian for trying to stop this senseless waste of human life.   Wouldn’t you?

I…I…Oh hell, I could co on but the Board so disgusts me, they are so impervious to understanding, so bigoted in their beliefs that it just seems useless.

For the good of their own souls, they should stop these mean spirited rants against Trump the Humanitarian.  He’s a better person than they will ever be.

Love's Not The Question, Love's Not The Answer

Love’s Not The Question, Love’s Not The Answer

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Super Tuesday has come and gone.  Immigration remains the big question:  Are we going to take in a million or two of Middle Eastern Moslems or not?  The motivation of those who want that aren’t clear and are surely inexplicable.  Hillary in her speech without referring directly to the invaders put the question for invasion to one of love, being a loving all embracing people.  All we need is love she said in so many words.  By love she meant our attitude toward immigrants not their attitude towards us.  The immigrants hate us and with darn good reason.  So no,  love is not the question, love is not the answer.  We have to be a little more hard headed.

Bret Stephens who writes his Global View column for the Wall Street Journal 3/1/16 has the title of his article: Staring At The Conservative Gutter and says, and I regretfully quote:  The candidacy of Donald Trump is the open sewer of American conservatives.  The Super Tuesday polls show a plurality of GOP voters stand to dive right in it.

May I respectfully say that Bret is light headed without a clue of what the global situation is. Cognitive disconnect; he is incapable of analyzing the situation and should shut up.  Obviously love is not the question to this colleague of the unctuous Hillary Clinton.  He is hate filled.  Disagree with him and he’ll settle the argument by pulling out his big .45 and shooting you dead.  He is so hate filled that he snarls vitriol at the plurality of Republicans voters he considers ignorantly misled.  Me included.  Bret and I have a major disagreement on that score.  I know Stephens’ type and he has highly overrated his virtue.  He is the kind that used to spit on the poor kid who had no shoes to wear to school.  Love.  Hillary you people have no love and it doesn’t take a village to see it.

For eight long years you and your boss, Boy Obama, have snarlingly defamed democracy by designating honest and lawful opposition as ‘domestic terrorists,’ ‘home grown lone wolf terrorists.’  Tell me, Hillary, do you consider that ‘unifying.’

For nearly a decade you and Boy Obama have sown hatred and dissension, need I mention Ferguson, in the US and maximum discord throughout the world, need I mention Syria.  And now you clutch your heart and say love is the answer.  Psychologists call that cognitive disconnect, Hillary.

Vitriol, I like that word.  Where do you think I learned it Hillary?  In the early days of your boss’s presidency he used it against people like me to describe the opposition to the horrors of your crimes in Tucson.  Count the murders and mass murders that have occurred during your reign of love Hillary.  Count the bombings.  You think you and Boy Obama are unifiers?  Think again.

And then your team releases not only the detestable spy Jonathan Pollard but the criminal Weatherman murderers of the Brinks guards they were robbing.  Instead of releasing them you should have put Bomber Billy Ayers in prison with them.  Are you twisted or what?

You don’t think Donald Trump is qualified to run a country a country composed of your kind of people?  Think again.  He’s got some answers.

Boy Obama is Bomber Billy Ayers disciple, why wouldn’t he release the Weatherman criminals?  And you’re going to continue his policies?  Hopefully not in this lifetime.  Dohrn and Ayers are thoroughly detestable people who stole millions and murdered many.  Obama is their disciple.  By releasing the Weathermen you and Boy Obama have endorsed their crimes.  Tell me how many people has David Duke murdered?  How many millions has he robbed?  His crime is interpreting reality differently from you.  You want me to hate him for that?  You want me to disavow Trump because he received an unsolicited endorsement from a respectable man?

Your minds are twisted Hillary.  Take some good advice and drop out of the race.  Love is obviously not the question here; love is equally obviously not the answer.