Mexico, Trump And The Holocaust

Mexico, Trump And The Holocaust

By

R.E. Prindle

 

John Bussey wrote a WSJ column (6/17/16) ‘The Nazi-Era Papers My ‘Mexican’ Mother Kept.’  It’s meant to tug at our heartstrings and show what beasts we are if we don’t go along with John.  Being the WSJ it is an anti-Trump article.  The Journal misses no chance to defame Trump.   The article condemns Trump’s questioning of Judge Curiel’s qualifications to try the Trump U case.

Bussey, as with all of the Left, condemns Trump as an unreasonable racist and bigot for doing so.  Me smelteth  hypocrisy.  Just as a point of reference I know I know a retired Federal judge.  His opinion is that a judge does not belong to an organization such as La Raza or the KKK and that on that basis Curiel ought to have refused the assignment, born in Indiana as an anchor baby or not.  On the bench it would be something like Eichmann being tried by the Jews. 

Trump, myself and all concerned citizens should demand that Curiel remove himself from the suit.  Obviously he was appointed to be a Mexican version of  Judge Roy Bean.

To compound his error, Mr. Bussey somehow associates Trump with Hitler.  Bussey himself is an anchor baby, his mother having slipped over the border behind her limping father in 1939.  Hence Bussey associates her with Mexicans doing the same.  Bussey compares Mexicans fleeing the tyranny of Mexico with his mother fleeing Nazi Germany.  Hitler and Trump are compared in Bussey’s line:  But even an enlightened society, one ruled by law, can quickly cut across tribal lines, as we see  again (my italics) in the dust-up over Judge Curiel and more broadly in this presidential campaign.

I would like to point out to Mr. Bussey that Germany was a very law abiding country; Hitler was law abiding and broke no laws which is something that can’t be said about our current president Barry ‘Executive Order’ Obama.  Further the civil war in Germany was between Tribal Jews and Tribal Germans.  Think, Mr. Bussey, think.

Nor need I mention that the atrocities committed against the native population of Palestine have all been committed under Jewish laws.  The law can be used for good or evil depending on the human legislators, Mr. Bussey.

And then, Mr. Bussey wheels out the tear jerker about his mother speaking English with a heavy German accent nevertheless fighting her way through high school and then courageously attacking the college curriculum ending her life uttering her last words in five different languages.

In clearing her safe deposit box among the few items saved was her old German passport stamped with a big yellow J, we all know what that means, in fact, the story is getting stale.  The facts are that neither she nor her parents suffered in any concentration camps.  They lived well and comfortably in the US while not only Jews were being killed but White American men were being slaughtered in Africa, Europe and the whole Pacific and the US was consuming all its resources.

While Mr. Bussey will not acknowledge it there is a whole school of scholarship that attributes both WWI and WWII to the machinations of Jewish schemers.  Roosevelt, handled by Jews,  maneuvered the US into the Pacific war to draw the US into the European or Jewish War.  The latter was the ‘Good War’, you know.

But, what does all this have to do with Judge Curiel and Mexico?  I don’t really know.  You’ll have to write Mr. Bussey at the WSJ to find out.  Or, perhaps, there is a Part 2.

Vote Trump

The Toplofty Judiciary Vs. Donald Trump

The Toplofty Judiciary

VS.

Donald Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Mukasey, Michael:  Trump, The Judiciary And Identity Politics, WSJ, 6/10/16

 

Trump well justifiably fears that the mistaken trial of Trump University is being used as a criminal means to eliminate his candidacy as represented here by the Federal judge Michael B. Mukasey.  Judge Mukasey attempts to defend the integrity of the presiding judge Gonzalo Curiel and the judiciary in general.

Quote:

(The) judges black robes are supposed to suggest that judges are all the same, that it doesn’t matter -or shouldn’t- whose head is popping up from beneath the crepe.  It matters, of course, but the symbolism, inherent in the robe works at least as aspiration.

Donald Trump’s claims may be the dirty underside of what we get when we abandon that aspiration, but they are by no means the whole of it.

Unquote.

The above quote is difficult to understand but as I interpret it judges aspire to objectivity but seldom achieve it.  Trumps ‘dirty’ accusations are what you get when you do abandon it.  That seems to be an admission that Judge Gonzalo Curiel has traduced his position soiling the crepe out of which his head pops.

At the beginning of the article Judge Mukasey says that:  Mr. Trump’s claim against Judge Curiel is both baseless and squalid, however he carefully avoids presenting any evidence that this is so.  It is also true that Judge Mukasey is a Jew as he indicates.  Apropos of what I don’t know.  If anyone reads popular Jewish websites such as Tablet Magazine and the Jewish Daily Forward he will find hysterical article after hysterical article denouncing Trump for one reason or another finally ending in anti-Semite, Nazi and Hitler.  Far less than objectivity in my book.

We are not clear then how far Judge Mukasey excludes this endemic Jewish fear and loathing, even hatred, from his own Judaic psyche or not.  After all his article is really a hit piece discrediting Trump and approving his colleague Judge Curiel.; not that I think judges might stick together. because if one is discredited all are.  This raises the interesting question of the thousands of apparently misjudged cases that our great Constitutional scholar and accomplished attorney Barack Obama is overturning.  Is Obama pointing his middle finger at the entire judiciary including judges Coriel and Mukasey?  I ask you.

After all, possible Supreme Court Judge Obama might easily be appointed in Justice Scalia’s stead if his endorsed choice Hillary Clinton becomes president in January.  He would be the second case of a former president being made a Supreme Court Justice following in the footsteps of William Howard Taft.  What would be more fitting than that this great president should become a great jurist for the next forty years?  I ask you.

As a legal scholar and attorney is Mr. Obama mistaken in overturning thousands of legal decisions made by, one presumes, White or Jewish judges who to reference the wise Latina Sotomayor had no racial empathy for the misprisoned men who are all black.  With a little more empathy on the part of their judges perhaps these thousands might never have had to spend a night in jail.

While not a lawyer, remember the Black mayor of Baltimore who empathized with the Black rioters so well that she said:  Nay, stop them not.  Let those that need to riot riot.  And so they did.  None of those rioters were arrested.  Others who had the need to destroy and loot did so with the same approval from the mayor.  That’s empathy for you.

Let us ask then, how much empathy for a White Donald Trump can a wise Latino like Judge Curiel have?  Not much.  So if there is no racial empathy such as Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor deems necessary perhaps Judge Curiel should recuse himself and allow another judge with more empathy for Donald Trump judge his case.  Trump should have his own man as judge to ensure justice.

To quote from Judge Mukasey again:

Whether or not Judge Curiel would use the “r” word -racist- it would certainly simmer just below the surface.  After all, suggesting that a judge would allow his ethnic ancestry to govern his rulings is simply unacceptable in America.

Maybe in America but how about in Mexico to which Judge Curiel certainly owes some allegiance.  After all Judge Mukasey implies that racial prejudice is ‘simmering’ just under the surface in Judge Curiel’s mind so why shouldn’t it boil over acceptable in America or not?

While Judge Mukasey may be a great jurist I think he has failed to make his point in this more philosophical issue here.  Even after his defense of Curiel it still looks like a kangaroo court or star chamber proceeding to this disinterested observer.

 

Disclaimer:  While White I’m right.

The Wall Street Journal On Race And Trump

The Wall Street Journal

On Race And Trump

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Trump is much given to cryptic remarks.  He condenses two paragraphs to about eight words.  This leads to much misunderstanding. 

The case in point is his criticism of Judge Curiel as not capable of objectivity because he is a Mexican although a probable anchor baby born in Indiana.  It is true that Curiel is a Mexican born in Indiana but that is not the whole of the story.

Curiel was selected to be a hanging Judge thereby getting the racial last laugh on Trump by a committee committed to punishing Trump for daring to disagree with their sacred conclusions.  Why wouldn’t they select a Mexican as Mexicans have a grievance against Trump which they express illegally  by blockading his rallies and criminally assaulting his attendees.  Now, really, how American is that?  Don’t these Mexicans, many of which were probably born on the Magic Soil of Magic America, and who carefully identify their true allegiance by carrying Mexican flags realize that?  Apparently not as they are flying Mexican flags and shouting Fuck America.

Our good friend Ye Editor of the WSJ on 6/6/16 has weighed in on what he considers Trump’s crime:  What elevates Mr. Trump’s remarks to the reprehensible is his equation of ethnicity with bias.

Good L-rd, Ye Editor, don’t you know that this whole Magic Country, this Oz amongst the Nations, equates ethnicity with bias?  Why single out Trump?

Witness our jolly Prez. Obama who is setting aside convictions of his Negroes by the score.  His reasoning?  They were convicted not for their crimes but by all White juries who, he believes, begin foaming at the mouth when they have a Negro in the dock.  By its very ethnicity the White jury is incapable of rendering an objective verdict of innocent.

Oh, oh, you say:  Good G-d, this man was born in Indiana.  He is wholly a holy American.

 What kind of hypocrite are you Ye Editor?

Don’t you realize those bigoted twelve White jurors may very well have been born in flyover Indiana too?  If being born in Indiana makes Judge Curiel a full blooded American incapable of a biased decision why wouldn’t it these White jurors?  You do realize this full blooded Mexican Judge Curiel belongs to La Raza don’t you.  Oh well, dual citizenship is OK when you’re a Mexican born in Indiana but then why can’t the Whites claim to be Mexicans born in Indiana if they want.  Maybe on any particular day they feel like Mexicans.  They may feel like a Mexican woman and want to take a leak in the Ladies room.  Hey, Ye Editor, this is a very fluid society.

When our great magisterial president Barry Obama equates ethnicity with bias how is that different from presidential candidate Trump doing the same?

Shame, SHAME, on you Ye Editor, ye shameless hypocrite.  I can see why you prefer to remain anonymous. Somebody should out you.  Trump should refuse to have you as his ‘journalistic’ adjudicator on the basis of ethnic bias.

Ye Editor shamelessly continues:  That truly is an attack on the independence of the judiciary because it means that a judge can be disqualified from a case merely for his personal background, rather than for any material conflict of interest.

Race is a material conflict of interest Ye Idiot