A Review: Foreign Affairs Jan.-Feb
Issue 1918
Article Two: From
Nazism To Never Again
How Germany Came To
Terms With Its Past
By Richard J. Evans.
Review by
R.E. Prindle
Foreign
Affairs having first, after a manner, dealt with America’s leading issue of
racial relations between Whites and Blacks, in this article attempts to tell us
how to think of Germany’s so-called guilt, which is to say the relations of
Germans and Jews. This section of the
magazine is titled The Undead Past: How
Nations Confront The Evils Of History.
So, once again, as in the first article of the magazine we are dealing
with supposed White Guilt that has become an historical fixture. This is a curious point of view of history in
which a phase passed through is a sinful period that has to be expiated. Is this an insane vision of
Judaeo-Christianity or what?
Once again I
am a dissenting voice, or, as I think, a voice of reason.
While Mr.
Evans concentrates on Germany’s supposed guilt the cause of the guilt, the
Jewish crocodile lurking the in weeds doesn’t come under examination and yet,
without Jews, no German guilt. A strange
quietness.
Here a few
words about Professor Richard Evans, sometime of Cambridge University. I will simply quote the Editors’ fluff page:
Quote:
When the
Holocaust denier David Irving sued an American academic for libel in 2000, the
historian Richard Evans served as expert witness, providing the key evidence
proving that Irving had distorted the record.
Evans, who was until 2014 a professor of history at Cambridge University
has written many books on modern German history, including a celebrated
three-volume history of the Third Reich.
In “From Nazism To Never Again…Evans described how successfully Germany
has come to terms with its past.
Unquote.
The unstated
object of Mr. Evans piece is how not only Germany but we hope also how we have come
to terms with our own implied guilt for Germany’s past. This is a much more complex issue than
America’s problem with Negro slavery.
The past must never die until Whites have been severely punished for all
the evil they have created in an otherwise peaceful, tranquil world. Thus the Editors emphasize that Mr. Evans
gave the crucial piece of evidence that destroyed David Irving’s, very likely,
justified defense.
For the
cognoscenti, Mr. Irving was at one time the most prominent expert investigator
of the Jewish holocaust. While he lost
the suit, which he should never have brought before a court that could not help
but be biased in favor of the Jews, to some extent Mr. Irving has gone a long
way towards winning the war. There has
been a lot of revision in the writing of that holocaust history since the
trial.
The Jews
have been forced to abandon many telling propaganda points. An example is that the notion that six
million were scientifically exterminated is no longer tenable. The Jews have adjusted their number much
lower. And while most people still believe that the six million met their fate
in Auschwitz gas chambers, the total number of Jews and others who died there
now is estimated at a little over a million.
Although it
is a crime in most of Europe to even question any aspect of the Jewish
holocaust or even to discuss the war, a revision of the whole camp system is in
progress so that a more accurate idea of what happened is on the horizon. In that sense Mr. Irving drove the Jews from
the high ground winning the war of words although he lost the battle of the
court room. For Mr. Evans and indeed for
the West it seems that the belief is that history begins with Adolf Hitler and
the Nazis and all history since stems from that momentary snapshot of the
past. Mr. Evans makes no attempt to put
the era into an historical perspective.
For him the past is not a flowing movie but merely a series of
snapshots. There is slight mention of
Jews except as victims of their holocaust.
At no time are they mentioned as one of the combatant nations of Europe,
while, in fact, the Jews of the world declared war on Hitler specifically from
the day he was elected. While the Jews and Nazis had been at war within Germany
from the end of the World War, guilt
should be distributed more evenly. True,
as a result of their declared war on Germany theJews lost that war and the
casualties of the holocaust must be attributed to that loss.
Nor did the
Jewish-German war begin in the twentieth century. Apart from being treated as an alien
intrusion within Europe for two thousand years the modern German-Jewish war was
shaped up in the eighteenth century under the aegis of a fellow called Jud
Suss. Suss was the most important of the
Jews of the modern period surpassing even the role of the Rothschilds, as he
was the originator. I have treated the
period at some length in my review of Lion Feuchtwanger’s novel Jud Suss and
the four movies that arose from it. Two
Jewish accusations and two German refutations.
This literary war covered the years 1926 through 1942. It is central to the armed conflict between
Germany and, actually, the world, more specifically the Soviet Union.
I will
briefly recapitulate some of my review mentioned above. Suss
Oppenheimer, was a Jewish adventurer who hit the jackpot when he met
Prince Karl Alexander of Wurttemberg.
Suss insinuated himself into Karl’s good graces much as the worm does to
the apple.
Over the
course of only a couple years Suss managed to change the whole nature of the
State of Wurttemberg. While Jews had
been forbidden residence in Wurttemberg Suss managed to get them entrance so
that long wagon trains of Jews are shown entering Stuttgart. That achieved Suss managed to obtain
monopolies on all commodities so that the Jews prospered while the Germans
became impoverished. Bear in mind I am
repeating the story as Feuchtwanger wanted it understood, I am adding
nothing.
Suss
increased the expenses of both the Prince and Wurttemberg inventing ever newer
taxes to fund them. He even managed to
get Karl to make roads toll roads so that the Germans had to pay to move around
their country.
To cap the
climax Suss, who was dishonoring German women at a prodigious rate, even
seduced Karl’s wife turning her against him.
Of course at Karl’s early death, when he was no long around to protect
Suss, an angry Wurttemberg arrested him while he claimed innocence of any wrong
doing claiming that he was only following orders. (He following orders; in what
context have we heard that used as a defense before?), was nevertheless found
guilty and sentenced to death thereby becoming a Jewish martyr.
After shouting anti-Semitism is an effort to shame the Wurttembergers, who
refused to be shamed, the Jewish defense was that Suss never died, did he. While the Germans put the dead Suss on
display in a gallows thirty feet high, Feuchtwanger said the Jews somehow
managed to substitute Suss’ body with someone else thus thwarting the goyim’
just resentment.
The lesson
Feuchtwanger is giving his fellow Jews is how easily the German’s or goyim (as
Roosevelt would be played by Morgenthau in the US a few years hence) could be
manipulated and have their States taken over without a real effort or
bloodshed. Indeed, Hitler’s greatest
sin was that he upset their takeover of Weimar Germany, more or less per
Feuchtwanger’s example, of which they were about to crown their achievement.
Thus, the
Rothchilds who began their rise on the back of Suss’ success, following his
example, insinuated themselves into the
government of Hesse-Cassell, using its capital of Frankfurt as their own to
direct their Europe wide activities. These
activities formed the content of the two Rothchild films. And from thence the Rothschilds achieved a
hegemony of Europe and became a major influence in the nascent United States.
Using
Communism as their springboard the Jews were seeking the opportunity to seize
Europe and they found their opportunity in Russia which was seized in 1917 by
the Communist Revolution. While the
Russian, or Jewish Revolution, actually, caught the Europeans by surprise,
there had been many portents including the Russo-Japanese war as well as the
failed Revolution in Russia of 1905. If
you were reading the US right during the Wilson administration of 1912-20 it
was as plain as day.
In keeping
with the growing threat of the Jewish led revolution Lion Feuchtwanger,
developing his vision of Jud Suss, wrote a play in 1916 on the career of Suss
before working up his novel on Suss published in 1926. The play was not well received, if it was
ever performed, but the book made quite an impression both in German and in
translation in England and the US. My copy
of an English cheap reprint is the 148th thousand. The movie Jud Suss, a propaganda film, was
released in 1933 almost in anticipation of the Hitler triumph in Germany and
the Jewish declaration of war against the country. Jud Suss was produced in England, and
distributed in the US under the title Power.
That title should be indicative of Feuchtwanger’s intent.
This
propaganda was then followed by the Jewish propaganda production of The
Rothschilds by Hollywood. The production
may have seemed wise in the conditions of the time but as the movie is
conspicuously missing today perhaps it is better for the Jewish cause that the
movie not be seen. In any event in 1942
the Nazis countered with their own magnificent production of The
Rothschilds. This movie is allowed to be
in release although it is a severe indictment of both the Rothschilds and the
Jews.
And so the
matter stood with the German defeat beginning in 1943. The above provides a German-Jewish background
to the Foreign Affairs article by Richard J. Evans.
-2-
While the
Germans lost the war- and how- the Jews lost the battle as between Germany and
the Soviet Union millions lost their lives upsetting for the time being their
conquest of Europe. But, like a starfish
when you cut it in two you have merely created two starfish. While two, possibly three million were killed
in Europe, five million or more lived on and they were in control of
Roosevelt’s administration. FDR’s
Director of the Treasury Department was a Jew by the name of Henry Morgenthau
Jr. Morgenthau boasted that he was
nearly a twin of Roosevelt considering himself as a co-president.
Significantly
Morgenthau’s very revealing three volume autobiography has disappeared from the
inter-net, no longer available in any form.
Even used copies are unavailable.
I was able to buy Vol. II before it disappeared, missing a Vol. I and
multi-hundred dollar Vol. III through ignorance of what the volumes
revealed. Had I known I probably would
have dished out for expensive Vol. III.
Perhaps some very carefully edited reprints may emerge.
Vol. III is
most important because it contains his Morgenthau Plan for the post-war
extermination of the German people. It
is gone.
Morgenthau’s
association with Roosevelt went way back to the time the two families lived a
short distance from each other in Dutchess County. HM Jr. had insinuated himself into the
Roosevelt family as he began his political career and could be found in
uninvited attendance at every social or political gathering. As he said to associates during his tenure at
Treasury, he didn’t relish the job but he was there on duty that he was also
serving Jewish interests for all those earlier years.
Unfortunately
for his and Jewish plans FDR began his third term as a very sick man, dying as
his fourth term began. The least he
could do for his country. Morgenthau’s
relations with his successor, Harry Truman, were non-existent. Truman disliked and distrusted him. When his post-war plans for Germany became
known horrifying Truman et al. the Pres. began thinking of terminating his
employment. Thus when Morgenthau
haughtily told Truman before the Potsdam Summit with Stalin that he was to be
taken along or he would resign the Pres. graciously and promptly accepted his
resignation. Direct Jewish control ended
there.
-3-
It is
important to remember that no surrender was possible for the Germans other than
unconditionally. That is that the
conquered is not allowed to stipulate any conditions such as the soldiers may
return to their homes, keep their guns etc.
Besides Germany as a country was piles of rubble having been carpet
bombed flat.
Total
destruction of the enemy was not new to US policy as during the Civil War and
Sherman’s march from Atlanta to the sea and back up through South Carolina was
total destruction with even food stores being destroyed in the hope that the
Secessionists would starve to death as part of their punishment for
seceding. And then General Grant
demanded unconditional surrender from Lee.
That meant that Lee surrendered all rights of the Southern Whites. The Whites of the South were virtually
enslaved while being put under the dominion of the Negroes so, with the
unconditional surrender of Germany, all the rules and ‘laws’ governing
treatment of the conquered were abrogated by General Eisenhower.
Thus,
Eisenhower, who was a devotee of the Jew Bernard Baruch sought, or what he did
was the same, to exterminate whole armies of German soldiers leaving them
exposed without shelter in a very cold winter while putting them on starvation
rations. This is what America, the light
of the world did.
Nor were the
Nazis solely responsible for the war.
The war was a war for survival.
In his Mein Kampf Hitler said that he knew that if his Volkists failed
against the Judaeo-Communists that German heads would roll in the sand. A grim prophecy that came true. His war did not begin in 1939, it began in
1914. The second world war was merely
the continuation of the first. The key
event of this period was the Communist Revolution in Russia of 1917 and the years
following. The war in the East did not end in 1918. The Armistice began a period of extreme
terror on the part of the Bolsheviks, that is to say, the Jews. The events of this horror have been
suppressed. They enter no history books. If you want to lose your academic position
even thinking about the atrocities will cost you your job.
The Civil
War began in Russia as the result of the Bolshevik takeover as Loyalists
attempted to oust the Reds was one of Jews killing Russians and Russians
retaliating against Jews. As just one
example, Bela Kun, the Hungarian Butcher, after being ousted from that country
moved to the Crimean Peninsula. At the
time the Jews were seeking a territory to form a nation State. Stalin had offered Birobidjan in Eastern Siberia
but they declined the offer.
They wanted
instead the Crimea. Of course there was
a Jewish colony in the Crimea but the majority was non-Jewish. Kun’s idea was to exterminate the non-Jewish
population. He began by weighing the
feet of these people and tossing them into the Black Sea, sort of a Russian
East River. Word quickly got back to
Moscow and Kun was recalled before he could complete his task. Stalin put Bela out of misery in 1936.
These
atrocities had not gone unnoticed by the rest of Europe. You may be sure Hitler was well
informed. So, the holocaust of Europeans
far outweighed the holocaust of the Jews.
But, who now remembers the Russian, Hungarian and Crimean
atrocities. They have been removed from
the history books. The Jews portray
themselves as innocent victims; only the goys are evil. Therefore, all blame was placed on the
Germans, even Russian atrocities were denied and covered up but when Stalin
died they were allowed to surface to discredit that fine gentleman.
And so
Richard J. Evans asks in his article, is it possible for the Germans to atone
for their crimes as though they were singular.
Neither Morgenthau nor Eisenhower succeeded in killing them so now the
Jews have to try to thoroughly emasculate them, stultify them beyond
recognition.
The question
becomes what is the historical narrative the CFR is creating and following and
who is the ultimate beneficiary. The
problem that the Liberal Coalition had to face in 1920 when the public failed
to embrace Woodrow Wilson’s post-war plans was how to correct the public’s
failure and make them see the CFR light.
Obviously since an authoritarian dictatorship couldn’t be immediately
established as in the then Soviet Union to compel people to accept it while
slaughtering those who wouldn’t follow
along. Another effective measure must be
found.
Now,
Wilson’s war years had been an authoritarian dictatorship that could have been
the envy of Lenin and Trotsky. Without
violence the US population had made a 180 degree turn from individualism to
collectivism. This attitude was to
survive the war in modified form in both parties but most especially among the
Democrats. A key in establishing
Wilson’s authoritarian system was the use of the propaganda agency under George
Creel called The Committee On Public Information- the CPI- the I should have
stood for indoctrination. The CPI was a
no holds barred move on a formerly independent American psyche. Creel bombarded the public with every known
means and then invented some. Of course,
Creel was a decent God fearing all-American boy but given the direction and
power he pragmatically became a force for the ultimate evil. He released every anti-social impulse known,
finks and informers abounded. By war’s
end the entire population was into a Democratic lockstep.
Creel’s
phenomenal success in capturing, as it were, the will of the entire country did
not go unnoticed. It was seen how easily
the psyche of individuals could be turned into permanent mob psychology
directed to a single purpose. Thus after
the 1920 election when the public rejected joining Wilson’s League of Nations,
a big belief of Wilsonites, it was determined to create an organization to
function on Creel’s principles to direct the nation’s psyche toward the desired
goal. This organization was the CFR-
Council On Foreign Relations.
At the same
time one of Creel’s staffers, the Jew Edward Bernays acting on the behest of
the AJC- American Jewish Committee- formed a campaign that in combination with
the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith took the same propagandistic
approach to control the American psyche in relation to its attitude toward the
Jewish people.
Bernays was
the nephew of Sigmund Freud through Freud’s wife. Freud joined the B’nai B’rith in 1895 as his
psycho-analytic career commenced. B’nai
B’rith, founded in the US in 1843, became a vast international
organization. Freud came to their Vienna
lodge which he attended religiously throughout his life in Vienna. Through the B’nai B’rith he became a prime
mover in Jewish affairs. It would seem inevitable
that his psychological experience would be put to use through the B’nai
B’rith. Bernays himself visited his
Uncle Sigmund in Vienna undoubtedly learning much at the feet of this supreme
Jewish guru. Freud entrusted him with
several works for translation into English.
Thus, Edward Bernays became one of the top public relations
propagandists in the twenties thirties and forties influencing many American
mores and habits.
In the
course of things both groups, the CFR and the Jewish organizations joined
forces combining efforts while making Jewish prerogatives their main objective
as in this article by Richard J. Evans.
Out of
office for the twelve years of the Republican Interregnum they were less
effective, slow to get moving, but after sabotaging Hoover’s four years in
office they were getting their man Franklin Delano Roosevelt into office along with a whole phalanx or two
of very effective Jewish operatives and goyish acolytes trained by the Harvard
law professor Felix Frankfurter. He was
rewarded with an appointment to the ‘Jewish seat’ of the Supreme Court when the
‘American Isaiah’ Justice Brandeis died.
FDR, of
course, had the most controversial presidency in American history but by the
end of his career in 1945 the CFR and Jews were firmly in control by
controlling the American psyche. By
1945, of course, they realized that you don’t have to put an issue up for
discussion, you could just present the public with a fait accompli and the
public would accept it. Hence, unlike
the debate over the League Of Nations that ended so disastrously for them the
country was presented by the fact that the United Nations was in existence.
Thus, the
narrative Mr. Evans, employed by the CFR, follows in his article concerning the
post-war German psyche is that of the CFR and the Jews with the Jews being the
ultimate beneficiary.
Mr. Evans
and the CFR confess as much in the closing words of Mr. Evans commissioned
article:
Quote:
The party
(AfD) has said that it wants to end Germany’s sense of responsibility for the
German past, but with so many solid and prominent memorials to the victims
(Jews only) of Nazism scattered across the land, from the Stolpersteine to the
concentration camp memorials, it is difficult to see how that would
happen. Such physical reminders of the
crimes of Hitler and the Nazis confront Germans every day; and while a small minority
may not like this, they have no choice but to put up with it. When it comes to accepting the sins of the
past there is, in the end, no alternative for Germany.
Unquote.
An
interesting passage, a singular narrative shared by the CFR and the Jews. Germany, that is, all Germans, must pay for
the past, a past which after all, Americans, Jews, Russians, yes, even the
English and French contributed their share of horrendous evils. Thus, the Germans are selected as scapegoats
to bear the sins and crimes of humanity.
Jesus on the Rhine. Now, as the
Jews point out about themselves, the crimes of a few Jews do not reflect on all
Jews. Their personal morality does not
apply to the Germans. The Third Reich
was not erected in an European vacuum.
Indeed, was it not erected in reaction to horrors perpetrated by Jews
and their Communist allies in Hungary, the Crimea and Russia itself? Were not Russians crucified on telegraph poles along hundreds
of miles of railroad tracks. It is said
that chemicals were applied to hands causing them to shrink, come loose and
flap in the wind at the wrists. Is that
not as or more insane than any concentration camp? Is that not a European holocaust to equal any
Jewish holocaust?
There is no
use in denying any of these horrendous crimes anymore than there is any use in
denying the Jewish holocaust. They are
all well documented but carefully suppressed except for the Jewish holocaust
which is endlessly accentuated. They are
well documented but carefully suppressed by the Jews in order to maintain their
innocent victimhood. This cauldron of
hatred and crime had been committed well before Hitler became Hitler and the
Nazis assumed power. Were not these
crimes as horrible that they had to be denied, had to be suppressed no less
than the meager crimes of the Nazis?
Are the
German people expected, like American Whites and Negroes, to accept full
responsibility for a world they never made but only came into? No.
Absolutely not. No living person
is responsible. Reject the notion out of
hand.
As Mr. Evans
article implies, are the Germans expected to pick up flails like the Medieval
flagellants and stumble (stolper) through the world flagellating their backs
while crying something like: Woe is me,
I didn’t put the Jews above me.
Something like the Wandering Jew of legend continually roaming the world
until the Second Coming? Are we jesting?
To quote Mr.
Evans: A small minority might not like
this, they have no choice but to put up with it.’ A small minority might not like this? A vast majority does not like this but only a
small minority has the courage to brave prison sentences by objecting.
They have no
choice? Ah, but they do have a choice;
they can put their stick in the spokes of an unjust ruling minority and bring
the evil machine to a stop. They can
demand an end to this nonsense; they can demand the equity of the rest of
Europe, that includes the Jews, who demand that they accept their emasculation
and become eunuchs, useless drones. And
who is the beneficiary of this crime against humanity? Self-righteous Whites and bumptious Jews. I get nothing out of this crime. Do you?
