Henry Ford And The Aaron Sapiro Case

1: Henry Ford And The Aaron Sapiro Case

By

R.E. Prindle

Hooray For Honkety Hank

After nearly a century, one hundred years, the war between the Jews and Henry Ford is still waxing hot. The Jews can’t or won’t let go. If anything the internet has given them a new pulpit to rage away. Even Ford’s The International Jew is readily available on the net. At the bottom of the Sapiro Case lie the articles from Ford’s national newspaper The Dearborn Independent collected into the four small volumes that comprise The International Jew.

First let me say that Ford did not include all Jews in the title as is commonly believed. Ford meant only those Jews administering and coordinating the international activities of the Jewish world community. There can be no denying, no doubt, that such a governing body did and does exist.

Secondly: Any criticism of the Jews for any reason is construed by them as anti-Semitism. Ford’s goal was to put an end to anti-Semitism, that is solve the Jewish problem, as well as Semitism. He believed that the Jewish Problem would vanish if put into the light of reason. The end result of that would have been the loss of specialness inherent in the Jewish psychology. Anything that challenges that feeling of specialness is anti-Semitism in the Jewish mind creating a psychotic reaction on their part per the group psychology taught by Sigmund Freud.
In the last few decades the Jews have been successful in creating a semi-legal status for what they call ‘hate speech.’ The concept is very ill defined and largely rests in the minds of paranoids. Hence per the ADL ( http://archive.adl.org/special_reports/ij/ ) the true impact of the Sapiro Case was an attempt to establish the legal notion of ‘hate speech’ by which all criticism of the Jews could be punished.


While it seems difficult to conceive of a punishment for a legitimate criticism it apparently can’t be too draconian for the Jews. In France today where the Jews have established a law, saying anything a Jew does not like may result in a very heavy fine and a prison term. The recent case of the couturier John Galliano is a point.

For those not familiar with the flap Galliano was taunted by Jews in a Paris restaurant. Goaded into retaliatory remarks this portion of the encounter was filmed and then the filming was filmed by someone behind the first cameraman. An obvious setup. The Jewish participants were carefully excluded from camera range.

Galliano’s remarks were not delivered in a rancorous tone, merely a riposte to his tormentors remarks.

Charges were then brought against Galliano for anti-Semitism. As a result of the mere charges Galliano was fired from posts worth at least ten million a year and then taken to court where he might have been fined a huge amount and given a prison term. Then, perhaps someone just wanted his lucrative job as it was taken over by a Jew. Coincidental perhaps but then…ten million a year! Who wouldn’t?

Galliano’s loss of status was complete as he was shunned by all former acquaintances. Taken to court he was convicted of a crime commensurate with a felony. He escaped punishment on condition of making amends by crawling on his belly for the Jews. At last count he had been so emasculated that he was considering converting to Judaism.

A hundred years earlier per Abe Foxman at ADL the Jews were attempting to establish laws in the US comparable to the French while making an example of the richest man in the US as they actually did recently of John Galliano.

As Galliano was provoked so was Ford. We will get into that in future posts.

The Jews vs. John Galliano

The Jews vs. John Galliano

by

R.E. Prindle

The great European Affaire Galliano has not yet ended. A little over a hundred years ago the great Affaire Dreyfus raged through France setting the country at loggerheads. In the great Jewish war against Europe the Dreyfus Affaire established the Jews as a semi-autonomous culture within France. One wonders what the Galliano Affaire is meant to achieve. Perhaps only redressing Dreyfus by inflicting a humiliation on a Franco-English hairdress… uh, I mean Fashionista.

The Jews have already forced through a French law making it a criminal offense to utter a single word of criticism about themselves. Perhaps the Galliano Affaire was provoked to show that no star is bright enough to escape retribution for the least, the very least, of utterances spoken in obscurity, almost one might say, a dream, while the persecuted is so draconically punished out of all proportion to the imagined offense that anyone with even a shred of ‘anti-Semitism’ in their heart will be cowed into submission.

Thus, while Galliano escaped any punishment at the hands of the French court save being criminalized, the Affaire is being reopened on the issue of whether Galliano can be allowed to be rehabilitated to the rank of a mere human being. He has been excommunicated if not outlawed. One would consider this as subject for the opera buffe, a comic opera, if it weren’t so serious for Galliano and actually the future of France as an independent country and not a satrapy of Israel.


Thus the July 2013 issue of Vanity Fair features what must be a 10K word article supposedly pleading for Galliano’s readmission to the human race and possible reinstatement to gainful employ. The article is written by one Ingrid Sischy, an assimilationist Jew. Naturally a Jew would be selected to reintroduce Galliano to humanity. I don’t know what Vanity Fair pays for very long articles, possibly 10 to 25K or even more, but the Jews continue to profit from the Affaire to the exclusion of Aryans. Twenty-five thousand might be pocket change in those circles but still, it does fill the tank.

Apparently the enormity of a drugged out, drunken Galliano’s response to harassment as a poofter by a Jewish woman in a Paris street bar is such that two years after the verdict the wound is still fresh in the hides of Jews that even the Chief Rabbi of France, Gilles Bernheim, another assimilationist Jew going by his first name, is still smoldering. P. 121:

Quote:

Not everyone has believed it to be appropriate to have Galliano in their midst. Gilles Bernheim, the chief rabbi of France, rejected requests to meet with him.

Unquote.

But, to be fair and balanced, same page:

Quote:

On the other hand, Rabbi Barry Marcus, [another assimilator] of Central Synagogue, one of London’s oldest Orthodox synagogues, has begun a dialogue with Galliano. The designer attended a service one Saturday morning…wearing a tallith and kipa.

Unquote:

So, just as Dreyfus returned from Devil’s Island, Galliano is being drawn back from limbo. Apparently a tit for tat. Marcus is holding out a warming hand to the sinner to raise him from his degraded depths:

Quote:

As a Jew and a rabbi, if anybody makes a mistake- and we all make mistakes- built into Judaism is the concept of giving a person another chance, or forgiving. So much of who we are and how we operate as human beings is built on that very principle.

Unquote.

Well, gosh, yes. Magnanimity is just so Jewish. One can’t be more holy than the Jews. Such magnanimity is seldom seen on the planet other than in Judaism. But let’s look at Galliano’s so-called crime and its circumstances. Miss Sischy begins her article with this dramatic paragraph:

Quote:

May as well face the worst of it right away, so here it is: The transcript of a cell phone video of an encounter at La Perle, a bar in Paris’ Marais district, which stunned the fashion world, and millions of people outside that world, with its mix of inexcusable anti-Semitism, childish bile, and outrageous obscenity. The video was first posted on the Web site of the British tabloid The Sun on February 28, 2011, and immediately went viral:

Is This Blonde Enough For You?

Woman: “Are you blond?”

Man: “No, but I love Hitler. People like you would be dead today. Your mothers, your forefathers, would be fucking gassed, and fucking dead.”

Woman: “Oh my god! Do you have a problem?”

Man: “With you? You’re ugly.”

Woman: “With all people. You don’t want peace? You don’t want peace in the world?”

Man: “Not with people that are ugly.”

Woman: “Where are you from?”

Man: “Your asshole.”

Unquote.

If the above is accurate there is no mention of Jews whatever. Apparently the subject of world peace as a non-sequitur is uppermost in the woman’s mind not Judaism. For the people who gave us Lenny Bruce to complain about obscenity is obscenity itself. The Jews who were responsible for breaking down the barriers of bad language now complain because someone follows their example. There is no mention of Jews so there can be no anti-Semitism in the above quote.

As to the woman asking ‘Are you blond?’ that would imply that the first part of the conversation has been omitted. We are at a loss as to who first initiated the exchange or how provocative it may have been. ‘Are you blond?’ is either a taunt or a sexual invitation.

There is also a question as to how Galliano would have known the woman was Jewish. It is true that the Mastermind of All Time, Albert Einstein said that he could tell a Jew at sight from a mile away but few Aryans can. Since the woman wouldn’t have appeared to Jewish to a besotted, drugged out poofter like Galliano then I have to assume that she announced that she was Jewish.

While Galliano may be highly regarded as a fashion designer by Fashionistas, I see him a comic costumier and in the video I saw he was amusingly at his best. An obvious poofter even to the untrained eye. Was the woman mocking his sexuality. I’m afraid we may never know now as that evidence has been deleted. As this incident was an obvious set up, and I do know set ups, I suspect the Jews themselves were the obvious culprit creating a faux ‘anti-Semitic incident as is their wont.

How outraged did they really think those millions were? And if millions were outraged, which is questionable, how many other millions, myself included, merely laughed and said: ‘Here they go again?’ I mean, this isn’t the first time the trick has been tried, or the second, or third, or….

The court itself didn’t take the accusation seriously. Their own investigation undoubtedly revealed that there was a great deal of provocation and misrepresentation. Of course, the idiotic self-serving law is on the book. Galliano wasn’t even adequately represented which is suspicious in itself. But, as a law had been ‘violated’ I suppose the court was obligated to adjudicate it.

While it was possible to give Galliano jail time as well as a mega fine the court chose to impose no sentence while fining him only minimally and then suspending it. I’m sure there is Freudian significance to the number but not being French it is beyond my ken. This may be interpreted as a slap in the face to both this particular law and the Jews. Both are absurd and somebody other than Galliano should be ashamed and shamed.

One is forced to believe the incident was merely a publicity stunt a la the Dreyfus Affaire to obtain not only a semi-autonomous status but a full autonomy above and superior to the French state and people- in effect a coup, a seizure of government so to speak.

While it isn’t possible for the Jews in the US to recreate their French position they have at least grouped themselves with all sub-cultures in the US against the dominant culture with their Anti-Aryan Hate Laws. The US Constitution makes their progress a trifle more complicated but as part of their global plan they are only a step or two from autonomy above the US government.

It is time for a big anti-Semitic plot to be discovered in the US now. From where it will come, who the designated villain will be is unknown. John Rocker? He’s already been used up. Who then? Where? When?

　



                                                               Oy vey!  What Next?