Friday, July 31, 2015

The Crime Of The Jews


The Crime Of The Jews

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Thirty years ago the arch Jewish criminal Jonathan Pollard was sentenced to life imprisonment for selling out the US to his premier loyalty Israel.  Under cover of being a dual US citizen Pollard obtained employment with Naval Intelligence.  Like a modern Alfred Dreyfus he began selling reams of top secret information to his country of allegiance, Israel.

This information resulted in the deaths of scores of US informants inside the USSR.  Pollard thus murdered every one of those agents when the information sold to his home country was given to the USSR in exchange for the release of a few Jews posing as citizens of the USSR for aliyah to Israel.

Nor was that the full story of Pollard’s and the Jews’ treachery.  For the last several years Pollard has been languishing in one of the US’ country club retention centers.  Now, our fey president has given Pollard a pardon.

It is said by the Jews that Pollard has suffered enough for releasing the documents to what after all is the US’ number one ally.  Israel is no one’s ally. He has suffered enough for a crime committed only thirty years ago?

Consider the state of Jewish comparative ethics:  Tablet Ezine’s top writer the lame brained Rachel Shukert published one of her articles recently.  Her horrendous claim is that in 1933 a seven year old child was photographed giving the honorable Roman salute to the passing parade of Oswald Mosely’s British Nationalist Party.  Seven years old, eighty two years ago!  A young girl, an angel, a child.  Ms. Shukert wants us to denounce this child, now a ninety year old woman for giving a time honored salute!  Johnathan Pollard murdered dozens and is excused while the Jews want the resignation of a ninety year old woman who at seven gave a Roman salute?

Indeed, after Ms. Shukert cheers a mass murderer like Johnathan Pollard released from prison after only thirty years?  Really, what is wrong with Rachel Shukert and the Jews?

Yes, that little seven year old angel was none other than OUR believed queen, Elizabeth.

Perhaps Ms. Shukert and her demented Jews want the Queen to step down because they are ‘offended.’  Fired from her role as OUR beloved Queen by Jews?  Really!

Jonathan Pollard- Queen Elizabeth; Queen Elizabeth-Jonathan Pollard?  It is even obscene to couple their names; a mass murderer vs. the Queen of the Western World.  And the insane Rachel Shukert thinks we will give the choice to Jonathan Pollard?  Fie, fie, for shame; you disgust us.  Now you know why Wolf Hitler did what he had to do.

Saturday, July 25, 2015

SHAME, SHAME ON YOU, RACHEL SHUKERT


Shame, Shame On You, Rachel Shukert

by

R.E. Prindle


 

The shameless writer for the shameless Tablet Ezine has done it again.  For a people who run a vigilante bureau called The Anti-Defamation Society the Jews are quite shameless in defaming other people.

In this case Ms. Shukert has selected a blameless little seven year old angel to defame as a ‘Fascist’ eighty odd years ago.  Enough that the Jews seek out a ninety-four year old man and require he get a five year prison sentence for following army orders also eighty years ago as a mere teenager, but now this shameless cowardly act?

Does Ms. Shukert not realize that the war is over or is that Ms. Shukert’s and Tablet’s point- their war is not over.  The Jews are waging their war on Europeans as relentlessly as ever and perhaps even more damagingly than the carnage they unleased on Europe and the West from 1914 to 1945.

That poor little seven year old angel Ms. Shukert is defaming is none other than OUR Queen Elizabeth; herself now a sweet little old lady of ninety years.  How vicious can Ms. Shukert be?  Is no one too young or too old for Ms. Shukert to defame?  Perhaps she would like to imprison OUR Queen for five years along with the ninety-four year old German gentleman.

Shame, I say, shame on you Rachel, your viciousness is absolutely unforgiveable.  Do not, I repeat, do not apologize; your apology will not be accepted.  Suffer in hell forever you despicable bigot.

Signed:

All the respectable people in the world.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Warriors On An Invisible Front


Warriors On An Invisible Front

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Recently in Connecticut a fuehrer of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League complained about a garage sale that was selling Nazi and Confederate memorabilia.  While the vigilante official acknowledged that no law was being broken nevertheless in the crusader’s opinion the mere showing of these historical artefacts constitutes ‘hate.’ 

Well, it may be said as well that Jewish artefacts such as the Magen David is a hate emblem also.  While wearing or displaying the Magen David or waving an Israeli flag should be hate also.  Why shouldn’t anything that a particular group finds ‘hateful’ not be banned?  Let’s be fair and make a list.

In point of fact what Jews consider ‘the good war’, that is WWII, was the central historical fact of the twentieth century just as the Civil War was the central historical fact of the nineteenth century in the USA and CSA.  As artefacts from all combatants and this includes the Jews have a deep intrinsic interest to everyone why should the Jews be allowed to erase these significant memories from the history books.  I consider such an act evil or satanic.  I have a right to my history as the Jews have to theirs.   I am under no obligation to accept their interpretation of the past.  I can form my own.

Jews are not free from ‘hate.’  Even their reaction is evidence of hatred, their wars on Christmas and Easter are evidence of hatred.  Their current war on ‘Whiteness’ that they say there is no room for on Earth is genocidal hatred of the worst degree.

Yes, the Jews know how to hate and they know how to incite hatred.

We are warriors on an invisible front fighting with words and ideas.  Are our weapons inferior to those of the Jews.  We cannot tolerate Jewish visions of self-righteousness.  We should quietly tell them we will not tolerate their incivility or listen to their unjustified complaints and then turn our backs on them to show them their invisibility.

Ignore and isolate them as we go on our way.  Their opinions carry no weight with us.  We are tired of being reviled by the haters of haters.  Ignore them, put their opinions down.  Oh pshaw them.  They are not the conscience of our world.

Monday, July 20, 2015

Time Is Wasting Our Past


Time Is Wasting Our Past

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The great fear is that the Western World will lose its past.  Certainly the Western past as we have known it.  Many factors are militating this loss.  Not least of the reasons is the transition from the mechanical to the electronic age.  Technological developments are severing or already have severed the Millennials from the America that was.  9/11 is a good date to begin the severance.

The literature of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries has little relevance to those born after 1980.  The literature of the nineteenth century is rapidly becoming as incomprehensible to younger people as Shakespearean or even Middle English.  The mores, especially the sexual mores, make so little sense to Millennials as to make the novels unreadable.  I would even guess that there are even those who have never seen live horses or cows.

No generation takes pleasure in what their forefathers did except for the odd ball romantics or historians.  This is even more pronounced today after the clean break of 9/11.  At eighty myself, I find most of my references falling on uncomprehending but polite ears.  ‘No reason to offend the old guy.’,  I can see them thinking as they smile blandly.  References even to Cary Grant elicit blank stares.  Bogart, who knows?  Thousands of movies have been made since either was on the screen.  Why should the young know?  They have their own lives to live.

Not only is the past incomprehensible, it is so vast.  How could any new person be aware of the ephemera that makes up a mature person’s life?

This past so important to them whether they know it or not is becoming incomprehensible just as the open door immigration policy floods the country with unassimilated if not unassimilable people whose cultures are given preferential treatment, claimed to be better that those young natives’ own. 

Sports have been given over to the Africans, records to world music, book publishing concentrates on immigrant stories and the shaming of Whites.  Restaurants offer every national cuisine on earth while American cuisine is despised and European cuisines with the exception of Italian demonized.

Global ‘diversity, is emphasized to the disparagement of ‘dead White men’ and the culture they thought they had provided for their heirs. What is left for young Whites?

In point of undeniable fact genocidal plans are being laid for the elimination of ‘Whiteness’ from the earth without any resistance from the Whites.

So, what is gone, is gone.  It can’t be brought back or even revived for a moment. It’s gone, but the future lies ahead.  Rather than lament it is necessary to salvage the laws and mores, the customs, the thought that gave Aryans their supremacy over the less evolved.  The challenge of the future in this Darwinian struggle for survival is what race or species will emerge supreme on this overcrowded planet?  Make no mistake it is time for some few billions to go.

Will it be African Supremacy?  Semitic Supremacy, either Jewish or Arab?  Chinese Supremacy?  Or will Aryans realize finally the nature of this primeval struggle beyond morality and reassert White Supremacy.  Perhaps winning the battle is the highest morality.  I think so.

The choice is suicide, go under quietly, or Conquest, assuming our rightful place in the racial hierarchy.

This is serious:  Let those be offended who will be offended.  What is that to us?  Being offended never caused anyone any harm.  I’m offended by what I see and hear constantly as you should be too.  Don’t be offended; get to work and set things right.

Saturday, July 18, 2015

Part V: Mick Jagger, The Rolling Stones And The Yobbo Revolution


Mick Jagger The Rolling Stones

And The Yobbo Revolution

Part V

by

R.E. Prindle
Rolling Stones- Brian Up Front
 

…they’re just war babies with the bell bottom blues.

==Robert Christgau

Along about 1968 Jagger among the Stones, at least, became disenchanted with his and their new manager Allen B. Klein of notorious fame.

By 1968, counting 1963 as the beginning of their labors the Stones had been working hard.  Jagger and Richards had emerged as successful songwriters giving them a financial advantage over fellow stones, Jones, Wyman and Watts.  By that time the band was said to have earned millions  but had virtually nothing to show for it except for a heroin habit and several cases of VD.  When one says heroin habit one reduces disposable income considerably.

The Stones last effort Their Satanic Majesties Request seemed to indicate a loss of direction.  Their initial impetus had been expended.  The impetus that began in 1963 had then played out.  The good part of the Sixties was over and the bad part had begun with the ’66 release of the Doors first album containing the appropriately named song The End.  The Rock scene had turned dark while turning the volume up.

The Stones knew dark so they quickly reinvented themselves as a Dark band turning out Beggar’s Banquet in 1968.  Out there on the buying end of rock and roll I groaned.  The new Stones were born as the Hounds of Hell emerging from a drug fueled Freudian unconscious.  Just what the world didn’t need.
Rolling Stones- Brian Odd Man Out
 

While Jagger and Richards engaged the world with their follies the other three members had to suffer enduring the ignominy in silence.  Richards would go on to astound the world with his drug offenses.  While Jagger himself descended into darkness as a Satanist carrying his inamorata Marianne Faithfull along with him.

While both deny other than a titillating passing interest in Satanism the facts imply a more serious involvement.

These years that should have been bright were the beginning of dark times, darker than the Communo-Nazi era for the world.  Deny it if he can, Jagger was a leader on the downward path.

Undeniably the Fifties and Sixties were a trying period but which decade of the century hadn’t been?  Fear of both Communism and the A-Bomb, not to mention the Neutron Bomb, kept people tense.  There was a disturbing lack of balance in which TV, newspapers, and magazines presented developments.  Nevertheless the beginning of the post-war period was one of astounding advances in knowledge both in Science and the Liberal Arts.  Huge layers of ignorance were sheared away.  For instance the knowledge of geological tectonic plates that demonstrated how the planet evolved was, shall I say, earth shaking.

In 1950 the highest an object had been was measured in feet; the atmosphere hadn’t been penetrated.  Seven years later the Soviets put the Sputnik in orbit.  Telstar went up in July 1962 to tremendous astonishment and acclaim opening the way to the future and the fabulous prosperity of the late Sixties and the Seventies.

Medicine cured syphilis and all venereal diseases, killing and disabling diseases were gone and even TB and polio were ended.  At the beginning of the Fifties a child had to ponder being debilitated by both as a probable occurrence.  The diet was improved immensely and made more varied.  But, as life improved the psyche grew darker, dissatisfaction with virtual perfection was endemic.  Murder and crime increased dramatically.  Charlie Whiteman in his UT tower, Richard Speck’s ritual murder of the Chicago nurses.  While the good genie let many good things out the bottle at the same time a cloud of darkness followed.  The country chose to embrace the darkness rather than the light.

During the Sixties Satanism was on the rise.  We all know there is no existing entity called Satan but Satanism is a fact of the psyche.  First truly released by Freud in 1900 Satanism had been emerging as a social force.  A 1966 cover of Time Magazine asked the question Is God Dead?  This sparked a fair controversy at the time.  That same year, less conspicuously and metaphorically saw the birth of the Son of Satan, Andy, in the book Rosemary’s Baby by the Jew Ira Levin followed by the movie of the same name directed by the Jew Roman Polanski.  Rosemary’s Baby was followed by a spate of Satanic novels and movies.  The shift from God’s Son, Jesus, to Andy was quite noticeable but we were slow to comprehend.
Andrew- Two Fingers, Middle Finger and Lifted Eye Brow?
 

The Satanic movement had been building since the middle of the nineteenth century when the Frenchman, Eliphas Levy, reorganized the occult along modern lines.  The Golden Dawn brought Satanism into prominence in the English speaking world.  The Golden Dawn was captured by the pervert Aleister Crowley who guided Satanism through the first half of the century.  He died in 1946.  A druggie and sex fiend, his sex magic in the Sixties was joined by that of the Jewish sex madman, Wilhelm Reich, also a notable Freudian.  Reich had even had his books burned by the US government but like a phoenix his sexual ideas rose from the flames during the Sixties.  ( See the movie WR, The Mysteries Of The Organism, read organism as Orgasm.  This movie is not for the weak of mind.)

The magical crowd had coalesced in the beginning of the Sixties.  In England it was led by the Satanic Process Church that emigrated to the US, LA based, and back to England.  In the US the chief Satanist was the San Francisco based Anton Lavey with his acolyte in Los Angeles, Kenneth Anger.  It is to be noted that the sex magician Charles Manson was associated with all these people in one form or another.

Jagger and his consort Marianne Faithfull were drawn into the flames through their friend in London, Groovy Bob Fraser who seemed to be the clearing house for all strange in London.  He introduced Mick and Marianne to Kenneth Anger while they found their own way to the Process Church. Mick was recruited by the Crowleyian Satanist and filmmaker Donald Cammell.  Cammell’s father had been a Crowleyian having writing a biography of him.  Cammell’s mind thus had been corrupted from childhood.

Cammell starred Jagger and Keith’s girlfriend Anita Pallenberg in his ’68 movie Performance.  Pallenberg was a long gone cutie deeper into Satanism than probably anyone in the crew. 

Mick had become acquainted with the fashion photographer David Bailey in late ’62 or early ’63.  Anthony Burgess published his Satanic novel A Clockwork Orang in 1962.

In ’62 and ’63 Jagger was a nobody, a student at the London School of Economics while doubling as frontman for the unknown Rolling Stones, or Rollin’ for the purists.  The two apparently bonded on sight as the two bought the movie rights to A Clockwork Orange.  This strange situation has never been explored.  As far as we know Mick had no money or anything really to recommend him to Bailey who was a very successful photographer and the model for Fellini’s movie Blowup.  Yet while a student and singer for a grungy R&B band Bailey took him under his wing, or perhaps Andrew Loog Oldham that inveterate man about town introduced himself to Bailey, then introduced Bailey to Mick with whom he was palling.  It would seem that Andrew first discovered A Clockwork Orange in mid-62 talking it up with Bailey and Mick.  Andrew and Bailey saw Mick as the hero of the book, Alex, leader of his band called The Droogs.  The idea of the Droogs exerted a fascination over the minds of Andrew, Bailey and Mick and through Bailey and Mick the Warhol crowd of NYC.  As a photog for English Vogue Bailey would have had an intro to New York and the American Vogue.

For those who aren’t aware, Vogue Magazine is a huge global presence.  There are many ‘local’ editions of the magazine published for Germany, France, Russia, Italy and even Japan.  It is really extraordinary.  I subscribe to the English edition and buy Italian, Parisian, German and the occasional Japanese copy from a news dealer in my own city.  Globalism takes on a real meaning.

In reading Stone’s histories there is no mention of Jagger being absent from London in 1963 but Bailey scooped him up and took him to New York, presumably at his own expense or perhaps that of Vogue to shop for a movie maker for their book.   Bailey who was very up on things may have thought that Andy Warhol would be interested; in fact Warhol did make a movie that purports to be based on Clockwork Orange but you couldn’t prove it by me.  But, in 1963 Warhol was not yet that famous or his vacuous movies.  Bailey must have had his nose to the ground with the sensitivity of a bloodhound.  Where Mick got the money for his share of the rights and trip to what is now known as The Big Bagel isn’t clear.

In New York Mick met the Dark, if not Satanist, Andy Warhol with whom he banded as quickly and tightly as he had Bailey.  Because of this the Stones would always be big in the Village.

Interestingly Mick’s girlfriend during this period was Bailey’s top model Jean  Shrimpton’s sister, Chrissie Shrimpton.

Things fell out, Mick gravitated to the adultress, Marianne Faithfull.  The two were arrested at the famous drug bust at Keith’s Redlands in 1967.

Apparently Mick et al. thought they were immune to the laws and mores of the time concerning drugs so that Mick took the arrest and subsequent conviction as a grievous insult.  It confirmed and hardened his devotion to Satan while solidifying his revolutionary aims.  He thought the ‘kids’ would be able to bring down the State.

Thus in 1967 they recorded and released the record album titled Their Satanic Majesties Request.  Smarting horribly- for all practical purposes Marianne’s life was ruined.  In combination with a succession of injurious events that would follow, Marianne’s psyche would never recover.  She had been holding the burning match to see how close to her fingers it got before she was burned, she now knew. 

Still in reaction to the arrest, following Satanic Majesties, Mick decided to make a film.  This became the long lost Rock And Roll Circus.  The movie only has historical significance as it was never released at the time.  Rights were held by Allen Klein so after his death in 2009, under his son Jody’s direction ABKCO released it for the first time.  Psychologically it places where Mick was in 1968.

The American Satanist Kenneth Anger had a huge shoulder to shoulder tattoo of the name L-U-C-I-F-E-R on his chest to show his dedication to the Commander In Chief.  At the end of Rock And Roll Circus as the band plays Sympathy For The Devil we see Mick groveling on the stage as though to the Master.  He wiggles out of his shirt rising to his knees to display a Lucifer tattoo on his bare chest.  Whether real or a transfer isn’t clear.  I hope the latter.

In 1968, at least, Jagger had dedicated himself to Satan.  While Marianne has since repudiated Satanism claiming the fascination was a passing fancy it seems clearly to have been more than that.

That aside, to be borne in mind as we move along.  Mick, who is no dummy, had been quickly learning the ropes of the record business since his introduction in 1963.  As he wasn’t getting enough money to indulge his fantasies, finances became his chief concern.

The Stones were first managed and promoted by the nineteen year old Andrew Loog Oldham.  Oldham was the right man to put the Stones on the road.  Unfortunately for himself Andrew was at the flighty if not to say flaky stage of life so that he found it expedient to sign the Stones to the American desperado or operator, Allen Klein.  Klein was the big talking type so endemic to the industry who promised the moon while actually being able to pry money from the labels not that much ever got back to the artists.  While first being pleased with Klein’s services getting money out of him was a problem so that Jagger quickly became disaffected with him.  In 1968 he began the search for a money man who would work in the Stones’ interests.

This was a critical period for Jagger and the band.  Their first rush of creativity ended about 1966 as the songwriters went dry and the band quit touring.  The transition from the sixties to the seventies actively took place between ’66 and ’67.  In fact that was the Sixties, the rest of the decade was a long slow fade. The artists most identified with the sixties didn’t make the transition to the seventies and beyond.  The Stones before ’68’s Beggar’s Banquet were a quintessential 60s’ band.  Beggar’s Banquet eased them toward the seventies.

So at this transitional period that must have been cause for great anxiety the band had little to show for their sixties output other than a certain notoriety that was however global and second only to the Beatles.

In his search for a money man Jagger asked his friend Chrissie Gibbs for his help.  Gibbs was a central figure in the Groovy Bob Fraser circle.  Fraser’s place was a central gathering place for the crowd including the American Satanist Kenneth Anger and the Warhol crowd.

Fraser himself was an art dealer who associated himself with the upcoming Pop Art Movement.  Thus he was the center of all that was hip and modern.

Gibbs knew of an investment banker by the name of Prince Rupert Loewenstein.  Rupert was an actual hereditary Prince who prefaced his name with that title.  According to Rupert’s memoirs, A Prince Among Stones, Rupert knew Gibbs in only the most casual manner, Gibbs was not exactly a member of the aristocracy as he is presented.

Rupert is a bit of an enigma.  He says, in his memoir, that he had never heard of the Stones when Gibbs mentioned them.  In the context of the times the Stones were rock musicians who are as a class not welcome in polite society and even some not so polite society, yet Rupert said to this very casual acquaintance that he would look into it.  Then, as he tells it, he learned who or what the Rolling Stones were and that all three principals of the group had been arrested on drug charges a year earlier along with Robert Fraser the art dealer and a true member of the aristocracy although now declasse.  Rupert even says that he agreed wholeheartedly with the judge.

Just as a point of reference, when I opened my record shop in 1967 the insurance agents would not even sell me insurance while the AAA agent cancelled my auto insurance.  I could obtain no amenities and only grudgingly services.  So, it is extremely strange that Rupert knowing the actual unsavory history of the Stones jeopardized his standing in respectable circles in the City and society to associate himself with them.  And I mean associate, he actually toured with the band.  If he didn’t know the kind of people he was with he certainly learned then.

Now, no one associated with rock and roll had any social standing especially the Stones as the bad boys of rock.  Then all the creeps and drug dealers who being around the record scene especially attached themselves to the Stones and believe me that crowd was well beyond unsavory.  Robert Greenfield’s book S.T.P. will give you some examples but the flavor of these people doesn’t come through in print.

As I read Rupert’s autobiography, he died a year or so ago, I find a distaste for Stones from beginning to end.  Even the title of his memoir, A Prince Among Stones, is a put down of the Stones.  Rupert obviously disdained the Stones.  So, one asks why he would choose to represent them?  And that’s only the beginning of the mystery.

Having accepted the assignment as they used to say on Mission Impossible he had to familiarize himself with bushels of documents and assorted records.  Before he could even confront Klein he had to spend a year trying to understand the documentation.  Klein was a tough cookie who didn’t play by any rules.  You grappled with him.  I’m not sure that the Stones to this day know what Rupert did for them.

Here’s the point:  The Stones are said to have no money with which to pay him, we are told that they were stone broke.  Didn’t mean that they didn’t have a great stash but, you know, they were broke.  This was a serious time for the band.  Get this:  Rupert worked three years gratis with no guarantee of ever making a dime.  That any of us should have luck of that kind.  Further he learned that there was no way the Stones were going to get any money out of Klein without very expensive litigation.  But, there were exceptions as we shall see.  The Stones entire career from 1963 to the end of the contract in 1971 that Andrew had saddled them with belonged to Klein.  Never fire your manager when he holds your life in his hands.

Any career they would have to make money would begin in 1971.  The intellectual properties Jagger and Richards’ had created would provide them with an income apart from the band although the publishing was sold to Klein by Andrew.  But the full intellectual properties would begin only with Exile On Main Street.    And of course by then the big boom in record sales was underway.  Even at the end of the sixties the record business was small potatoes.  The stadium era was on the horizon.

From Rupert’s point of view the only real potential for money for him would come from the Stones’ touring.  The Stones would do some non-stop touring beginning in 1971.  The ’69 US tour was Rupert’s introductory tour during which he learned how inefficient and criminal touring was..

Until Rupert reorganized touring, the road had not been profitable for the Stones.  No money at all.   So Rupert began his management career on the off chance that the Stones would stay together, actually a fairly long shot, and he could mount some extravaganzas and monitor expense to make the road profitable.  Little he knew that he was catching the really big one.

If you sit and think about this a little it will blow your mind the chances that Rupert was taking especially with a heroin addict of the status as Keith.  I mean we’re talking the Master of Flake with Keith- no offense intended.  The man blew millions that Rupert was setting up in recording contracts when Keith was arrested with a jug of heroin in Toronto.  Keith was not in this alone, there were three other Stones plus Mick as well as Rupert who had bet his life on the Stones.  Can you imagine how crushed Rupert was when he had to call all the bidders and advise them of Keith’s gaffe.  Keith cost Rupert a couple million too.

This is amazing, the pre-’68 money had been so badly managed that the Stones owed more tax money that it appeared that the band could ever pay off; especially when every new dollar would be taxed at ninety percent.  What were the Brits thinking?  As I understand it the Stones have never paid the debt off, or tried.  So Rupert compelled them to leave England for a more tax friendly climate.  As we are repeatedly told they were broke one wonders how they expected to finance their life in France.  Mick and Keith were OK because as Robert Greenfield tells us in his book Ain’t It Time We Said Goodbye: The Rolling Stones On The Road To Exile just before the Stones left England Klein sent Mick and Keith each a check for 800 and some odd thousand dollars.  That is nearly a million each.  I don’t know whether BMI paid royalties quarterly or half yearly but Mick and Keith should have gotten a check of comparable size quarterly, semi-annually or annually.  For the next decade or two probably double that.  No sympathy here.

Wyman and Watts both bought handsome residences on the Riviera so one wonders where that money came from while Exile was being recorded.  They settled on the Riviera where they spent a fortune recording Exile On Main Street.  Over half a million dollars.  And while Exile sold well still only over seven hundred and some thousand copies on its first release; not enough copies to surpass recording costs so they received nothing for the LP initially.  Still Rupert hung in there, drug stories or no.

As the only hope for the Stones to make money, apart from intellectual right for Mick and Keith, was touring and thereby justify Rupert’s decision to throw in his lot with them Rupert set about to make touring as profitable as possible.  He was in for some surprises as he had to come into contact with the Underworld, Mafia to you and me.  I don’t see how he or they ever thought that there would be the truly big money of the last tours especially in North America but luck and the times were with him and them.

The Stones, about whom hung an air of vulgarity, were never a top selling recording band, mediocre at best but Jagger was a top performance artist while Keith was and is revered as a guitarist and personality.  The nature of the tour also evolved so that under the guidance of Rupert major companies such as Chrysler sponsored tours contributing up front money while toward the end promoters  ponied up a couple hundred million to manage the tours.  The expense of putting on the show was the Stones but the mechanics of lining up venues and retailing the tickets was off their hands.

If you can stay together the intellectual property or ‘brand’ can become extremely valuable providing a payoff as time goes on.  The Stones may be unique in the size of the payoff but many performers have been on the road for decades and are still out there, viz. Bob Dylan.

Still given all the imponderables, one is astonished that a respectable investment banker would take such a huge risk on his future.  Not only had the principals been arrested and convicted, actually sent to jail, on a drug charge but they were involved with the revolutionary movement, indeed, other revolutionaries considered them one of them.  Jagger wrote revolutionary and agitprop songs.  As the seventies were characterized by revolutionary upheavals throughout the Western world including European outfits like the Baader-Meinhoff Gang and the Italian Red Guards and the infamous Carlos as well as the criminal and destructive American group, The Weathermen it would have been desirable to have some inconspicuous means of communication.  Historically a means has been itinerants who had a reason to travel about such as the entertainers like the Stones and Bob Dylan.  Cultural exchanges in governmental usage.

I think it quite possible, although I have no hard evidence that when Rupert was investigating the Stones at Chrissie Gibbs request he may have contacted the security agencies of England who seeing an opportunity to put an operative above suspicion in the Stones organization recruited Rupert.

As an intelligence agent in the Stones’ organization Rupert could maintain contact through his Europe wide aristocratic friends while dealing through the Stones with the revolutionaries who, at the very least, hung around the Stones.  I suspect that Mick and Keith were more than sympathetic to them.

Eric Burdon of The Animals as a solo artist was arrested by the German police on suspicion of aiding the revolutionaries.  Eric pleads innocence of course but the rock crowd as a group was sympathetic to the revolutionaries while the lyrics themselves were frequently openly revolutionary.  Police suspicion would not have been misplaced.

In Eugene Oregon where I had my record store at the time, revolutionary zanies functioned quite openly, at least as far as I was concerned, infesting the foothills of the Cascades where they had built bunkers to store weapons, ammunition and food against the Day which was thought imminent. As a record store owner they assumed that naturally I too was a revolutionary.  The Black Panthers for instance extorted money from me.  I was caught in the middle as the authorities assumed naturally that I was too.  It was tricky as I was then walking a tightrope between two hostile sides.

Thus Rupert otherwise inexplicably declassed himself while undertaking to represent a bankrupt band that was hopelessly in debt to the Inland Revenue.  A debt he knew could never be paid off and never has been.  In fact his first act regarding the ones was to advise them to leave England for more tax friendly shores.

When Rupert moved the band from England they ceased being a specifically English band becoming a band without a country or a true global band.  As a global band it is probable that Allen Klein even though Jewish was strictly of a US geographic mentality whereas Rupert being Europe based with friends in each country was better able to deal with different tax laws, mores, etc.  As a businessman he was better prepared to set up the business organization that the Stones needed.

It must be borne in mind that when the band left England on the cusp of the big boom of the seventies they became a multi-million dollar corporations with rather intricate financial problems.  Klein had the reputation of a buccaneer; he could squeeze the pips but he couldn’t command respect, Rupert could.

So, the success of the Stones after ’68 depended in a great part on the superb financial management of Rupert, as well as his ability to deal with a lunatic like Keith.  Rupert had no sooner got the band established in France than Keith got them thrown out of the country for, let’s not put a gloss on it, criminal behavior.  Keith was handling large amounts of heroin while providing, as it were a safe haven for the Marseilles criminal drug element.  Finally Keith and Anita turned a young girl, possible with violence, which resulted in the Stones having to flee France.  That made two countries they could no longer perform in, at least for a while, France and England.

I’m sure Rupert smacked his forehead, wrung his hands and asked the universe, what the hell is going on?  Keith and Mick must have been born under good signs as Rupert stayed on.

Having established a basis for prosperity Rupert then set about dealing with the first key problem, Allen Klein. Although broke the Stones initiated an expensive , read multi-million lawsuit against the wily Klein.  Americans operate on the principle that possession is nine tenths of the law so getting anything out of Klein would be a small miracle.  Without numbers to go on any accurate notion of what happened is impossible but as both sides were into the lawsuit for millions over eighteen years it would seem the results when they finally signed off were profitable for each.

So, having serendipitously acquired a supremely competent money man in Prince Rupert Loewenstein the financial future of the Stones was secured.  They would become perhaps the richest band in history.

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Donald Trump Shows His Resolve


Donald Trump Shows His Resolve

By

R.E. Prindle

 

As a website has appeared Trump must be serious.  I do have come criticisms of the site I hope will be helpful.  Trump is up against some solid internet professionals so the site is going to have develop rapidly.  Like most executives and politicians, I’m thinking of Romney, Trump is used to commanding, being above his workers.  Obama works as one of the fellows, a fellow soldier in the righteous battle.  The political war is one of ideals, Trump will have to develop an ideal in order to do battle.

First I would get some professional to redesign the site for maximum eye appeal.  A little more on the warm and fuzzy and not so sterile.

Secondly I would change the motto from Making America Great Again to something like Putting Our Country Back On The Right Track.

The country is great although tarnished by the antics of a self-interested bigot following his own personal agenda to the detriment of half the citizens.  Trump will put the country back on track for the benefit of all citizens.  Let’s hope.

Thirdly:  His bio reads like a job application for a CEO rather than the ‘leader of the free world.’  There is no statement of intent.  I don’t care whether Trump went to Wharton or not and neither does 99% of the voting population; a whole bunch of people might resent it.  I know enough of his history to know that he is capable of running a giant corporation employing and managing a diverse work force seeking only the most competent and meritorious people.  Hopefully he will do the same as President of the United States.  Business classic:  Art Of The Deal?  Who cares.  As a great negotiator can he successfully deal on a global political scope?  That’s what the electorate wants to know.  What can Trump do for the country?  We already know what Obama can do for himself.  Several million dollar vacations indeed.  Hit where it hurts.

What is important is will Trump be a President of all the people showing, racial, religious and sexual favor to none?  There is no place in America for hate laws or second class citizens, yet the laws favored by the Obama administration place civil disabilities on some and enact exclusionary laws favoring others.  What is Trump going to do to make all citizens equal with civil disabilities for none?

While bashing the Mexicans gets their attention establishing the fact that the country will no longer be intimidated by anyone as Obama has been intimidated by all, discriminatory civil disabilities is a bigger vote getter than any other issue.  No more Obama divisive racial and sexual politics.

Trump the Statesman must emerge and Trump the landlord fade and vanish.  Stop talking about yourself and address the concerns of the people.  Trump needs forward thinking associates.  The past is behind us; the future lies ahead.

Sunday, July 12, 2015


You Have To Be Jewish

by

R.E. Prindle
 
 
 

I’m not White; I’m Jewish.

Current Jewish anthem.

 

Noel Ignatiev, the Jewish Harvard professor, a couple decades or so ago lectured us all that Whiteness must die, disappear from the face of the earth.  Today’s Jews are moving the plan along by divorcing themselves from Whites.  The current anthem they all sing along to is ‘I’m not White, I’m Jewish.  Let’s hear it again:  I’m not White; I’m Jewish.’

Reet petite, that’s alright with me.  Let’s hear it again; it clarifies the 1914-45 turmoil a bit while getting Wolf Hitler off the hook.  It appears he knew what he was doing even if he wasn’t able to do it.  Now that the Jews have left the building to become just another race along with the Negroes, Chinese etc. we don’t have to take them seriously.  Anti-Semitism- where is thy sting?

Anent, our good friends at the Jewish Daily Forward have published a piece titled Nazi Museum Documents Munich’s Ignominious Past- And Puts Hitler In His Place.  While we weren’t watching, at least I wasn’t, German cities began building National Socialist museums.  Gavriel Rosenfeld’s article celebrates the opening of Munich’s.

One wonders why Gabe thinks Munich’s past is ignominious.  I guess you’d have to be Jewish to think so.  True, the Nazi Movement began in Munich but that was a combination of accidental circumstances not foresight.  Munich certainly didn’t plan it.  Besides what does Munich have to apologize for?  Now that the Jews have officially separated themselves from Europeans, Aryans, Whites, whatever, that is, declared the autonomy they have clearly always believed they were we’re relieved of any obligations to them, if we had any.  It also clarifies WWII.

The Jews were clearly functioning in their own interests, inimical to those of Aryans.  In fomenting the two world wars calling in the US and USSR in WWII to exterminate the Germans for them was genocide; they created a hellstorm that lasted thirty-five years in which the lives of hundreds of millions of Aryans were snuffed or made miserable beyond belief.    And then they whine that they too suffered collateral damage.  Like, who cares?  It’s undeniable as far as I’m concerned.  Merited.

In the US they pout and point fingers screaming their war cry of J’accuse because Roosevelt didn’t stop the war he was fighting for them and remove the five million Jews from the combat zone to safety in the US.  Boy, do we White boys fighting their war feel bad because the thoughtless FDR who had already put us in jeopardy to fight the Jewish war, the one they call the ‘good war,’  didn’t stop the war for their benefit.  Fuck that, as Lenny Bruce would say.  There wasn’t anything good about it.  Too bad a few Jews died along with the hundred million Whites.  What are the Jewish deaths to us; we mourn our own.  The Jews aren’t White anyway.   What’s are they to us? If they dislike us so much they don’t want to be thought of as White I’m not hurt.  OK, you’re not White, you’re Jewish.  Perfect a vanishing act; we’ve had enough of you.  I’m not Jewish; I’m White.

Thursday, July 9, 2015


The Supreme Court v. History, The Law and Homosexuality

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Posted on Medium is an essay by Zach Herz discussing law, history and Justice Alito.  Zach says (my interpolations):

On April 28, Supreme Court watchers got an impromptu lesson in Greek history from none other than Samuel Alito.  While hearing arguments on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans in Obergefell v. Hodges, Justice Alito decided what we really needed to be talking about was Plato:


Justice Alito:  But there have been cultures that did not frown on homosexuality.

Prindle:  Name one.

Justice Alito:  That is not a universal opinion throughout history and across all cultures.

Prindle:  Name an exception.

Justice Alito:  Ancient Greece is an example.

Prindle:  Do you have any evidence to prove that?

Justice Alito:  It was well accepted within certain bounds.

Prindle:  Certain bounds?  That is not universal but exceptional.  You disprove your own point.

Justice Alito:  Well, they had marriage didn’t they?

Prindle:  Where are you going with that?

Justice Alito:  …they had same-sex relations did they not?

Prindle:  That’s why they were despised across all times and cultures.

Judge Alito:  So thus limiting marriage to couples of the opposite sex was not based against gay people, was it?

Prindle:  The period of which Justice Alito speaks was the triumph of the Patriarchy over the Matriarchy.  Men had discovered their part in the reproductive process.  They had learned, as they expressed it, that the female warehoused the foetus during incubation, the male being the true progenitor or inseminator.  Therefore the wife was sequestered within the home, not allowed to come in contact with any man not her husband who might impregnate with his genes rather than the husband’s.  Viz. current Moslem customs.

There was no need for debate about gay marriage since all gay unions were sterile.  Marriage between gays was and is a farce.  Even so, no one cares whether gays marry but there is no need or requirement for the State to recognize it.  The marriage is meaningless.  Let them go through a ceremony, something like a Black Mass that mocks the Holy Mass.  Who cares?  What’s the fuss?  Why is the Supreme Court even listening to such nonsense?

-2-

In my reading I have found no society that didn’t despise homosexuality.  The Araucanian Indians of Chile for instance made ‘gays’ wear their clothes inside out and walk backwards.  All the Indian tribes of America despised ‘squaw men.’  All societies imposed civil disabilities of some sort on them.

In Greece homosexuality was not universally accepted.  In the Theban army Homos were segregated into a unit called the ‘Sacred band.’  In this case Sacred means untouchable.

There are no obvious homosexuals in Homer’s Iliad which means either that there were no Homos in the Greek army or they were unmentionable.

Juvenal, the Roman poet, speaking of homosexuals in his Second Satire says:

You’re castigating vice, you the most notable dyke among all our Socratic fairies?
 

Juvenal clearly designates homosexuality as a vice while castigating the sin as one of Socrates and his followers, not specifically Plato or anything universal , as Justice Alito alleges.

Whether homosexuality was a matter for marriage or acceptance is beside the point.  There is nothing in the Constitution dealing with sexual matters.  Nothing in the Constitution gives Supreme Court Justice Alito who is totally ignorant of history or the nature of vicious homosexuality authority to legislate about it in any manner.

It is always a treat to hear the Justices’ opinion on whatever but they should keep their drawers up and zipped.  Sexual mores and customs are beyond their competence.  If the Court can tell me who or what to fuck this is expressly denied by the Constitution.  They call it slavery.  A real no-no in that there amendment.  Fuck the Court decision.  Nice to have their opinion.  Now they should get straight.